A casus belli for Rome in its struggle with the Baal cult of Carthage was child sacrifice. The Carthaginians worshipped Baal, an exemplar of the Babylonian Sin, or moon deity. Baal cults dominated the Bronze and Iron ages in the Near East, as did mystical beliefs in Evolution and naturalism. The Carthaginians slaughtered their young boys and girls in homage to Baal, soaking their blood into the North African soil in a barbarous gesture of appeasement and supplication. Baal cults were known to thirst for blood, both in war and peace. Draining the blood from young girls and boys was a covenant with the celestial deity, an embrace of pagan puritanism and atavistic license. The Carthaginians were originally Phoenician or Greek-Semitic mix from what is now Lebanon. They took Baal with them to North Africa. The slaughter of innocent children was immense and ran into the hundreds of thousands.

Islam also follows the cult of Baal. Al Lah means The Lord, and The Lord of Mecca at the time of mad Muhammad Abdullah [slave of Al Lah], was Baal, who was Muhammad's family deity. The red carnate statue of Baal dominated the Meccan Kabaa or cube, a collection of 360 idols and gods worshipped by the Arabs and which was a centre of pilgrimage making Mecca wealthy.

As with the Carthaginians, Moslems and Islam in-toto, shed, drain, and pour blood in oblations to Baal. The Moslem daughter-slaughter consumes some 20.000 girls each year within Moslem states – about 4 x the number of children murdered as sacrifices annually by the Carthaginians. The very clever people call these murders 'honour killings'. 2000 Moslem 'terror' attacks irrupt each year with Moslems killing apostates [less than pious Moslems], or the hated Jew, Christian and Infidel. The very clever people call these terror atrocities outbreak of mental illness.

Rape and public attacks are rife now in the Eutopia, a super state devoured by socialist and morally-relativist theologies. Up is the new down in the Eutopia. Moslems could rape the entire 60.000 Eutopian super-state staff, cut off their heads, blow up their buildings and the peasants would be regaled with 'nothing to do with Islam' stories from the useless lame brain media. Terror was a foundation of Moslem cult belief, and Mein Koran is riddled with 1600 verses of hate speech and terror against non Moslems. The Eutopia now uses 'hate speech' to terrorise its own compliant morally-relativist citizen knaves into compliance with the Islam-is-peace cult. How ironic.

Like all Baal cults, the draining of blood and the invocation of pain is central in Islam. Witness FGM. The clitoris is carved off with an unsterilized knife, or piece of glass. Because the clitoris is located so close to the urinary opening, that area becomes infected. This mutilation is sewn up, oftentimes incompetently or too quickly, usually with a dirty needle. A crude hole, much smaller than the normal opening, is excavated so that urine and blood many pass out.

This carnage induces shock, and sometimes the young girl – maybe as young as 7 – might die from it. If they survive, the chances are good that she becomes septic, or contracts septicemia. Then she will die in agony after 3 or 4 days of intense pain. With septicemia, the body and specifically the internal organs, shut down one by one, until the entire corpus is rendered dead. If the young girl survives and does not contract septicemia, she will suffer her entire life from urinary tract infections. The small, barbaric hole, which allows the emission of urine, does not contain meatus, or the mucous membranes which protects the interior of the tract from infection. The bacillus will naturally rise from the opening all the way up to the kidneys which sit at the apex of the urinary tract. The pain is insufferable and prolonged. The kidneys might well shut down and fail. She could die.

If the girl does survive into adulthood, or within Islam, at least until the age of 9, sexual intercourse becomes a litany of agony. The vagina is created to allow a penis to enter, as well as a baby to exit. It is a marvellous design, an organ of brilliant innovation. However, the Moslem FGM procedure has completely destroyed the functioning of the vagina. The man-made hole is too small and the pain centres inflamed due to the mutilation. There is no mucous at the opening, and no lubrication beyond the opening to receive an erect penis. This is because the clitoris, which generates the salve to reduce the pain of entry is gone. Excruciating agony is stimulated when there is an entry. The women must feel as if someone took a knife and jabbed it upwards through the imprecise hole. Intense pain would sweep up and consume the women who would enjoy only torment. Instead of a joyful union of man with wife; you have the barbaric painful imposition of man's pleasure with a slave.

FGM is something one would expect from a bronze-age inspired cult of Baal. It dehumanizes the woman. It sacrifices her for the man. It reminds the woman that with each entry, the man is Lord, supreme and can do what he wants. It is sick, psychotic, bloody, and should be outlawed everywhere there is civilisation. When Moslems profess their 'faith', ask them about FGM and what their views on it are. Ask them if they agree that mutilation, which can lead to death through shock, is 'religious', or if indeed it is just another instantiation of the Carthanginian-Baal cult and its lust for blood and pain. FGM is a poignant symbol of Islam's Bronze Age inspired Barbarism.

Brilliant and precise article on the base fact that Islam plunders, squats, pillages, and destroys. It does not assimilate, enliven, or empower. Bronze age celestial inspired pagan cults like Islam, are by nature, forces of death and destruction. This Al Lah is Baal and for the globalist-cultural Marxist elite, resplendent in their ignorance, they need to read about the death cult of Baal, embedded in corrupt paganism within the Canaanites, Hittites and other Near Eastern regimes and tribes. One of the reasons for the attraction of Hebraism was the sheer savagery, brutality, and lusts of the Baal cults.

'Prof. Abdessamad Belhaj also detailed how globalists are using Muslim migrants to turn Western countries into socially divided societies of easily-controlled consumers.

….Belhaj, who has authored four books and had more than fifty studies published in international publications, cautioned that as a result of the globalist system, “sustained poverty … is going to be the fate of a considerable portion of people in the West'

And

'The scholar of Islam and social sciences warned that large numbers of migrants are “calamitous” for the European people, and that neoliberal elites see Islamic terrorism, and state bankruptcy and collapse as collateral damage in their pursuit of endless wealth.'

Also,

'The Moroccan academic, who works in countries across Europe, stated that Muslim migrants view “all property as ‘given’ and not ‘acquired’ by work”. Professor Belhaj revealed that Muslims, therefore, believe that by taking Europe’s land, Muslims will be granted wealth.'

'He contended: “In Islamic discourses, migration is seen as a beginning of the Islamisation of Europe, the rich land that will change the fate of Islam, from a religion of the poor to a religion of the rich.'

Islam conquers. It does not assimilate. It also denudes and eats. It does not add, or enrich. It will feed off the Eutopian project. Welfare rates amongst Moslems are well over 50%, probably closer to 80%. In Moslemified urban areas, rapes, crime, social incohesion, cultural destruction abound. The importation of a failed cult, with failed adherents, who in many cases refuse to assimilate and demand Sharia Law and special 'rights', is either going to result in civil conflict and/or societal implosion.

Consider this fact - In Turkey the age of sexual consent is 9. The Euro elite is obsessed with admitting Turkey into its bankrupted Eutopian socialist kleptocracy. 80 million Moslems will be able to pass into the EUTopia. They will simply swamp Europe with Moslems, all part of the hijra or migration, which is always a part of imperialist Submission [Islam]. Do the Euro elite and their dimwitted Islamophiliac allies really approve of child sex under the rubric 'cultural enrichment'? Do they really support the sex slavery of women, FGM and the murders of 10.000 Moslem girls each year ? There is nothing enlightened or 'progressive' about a Bronze age inspired celestial cult, whose Al Lah is Baal the moon deity of Mecca.

In today's Orwellian world, Moslem-female sex slavery is now 'freedom'. Wearing bed-sheets which hide your personality and shape is 'liberating'. Females who are worth half of a man, enjoy 'equality and rights'. Sex slavery condoned in the Koran and still practiced in Islam, is now a 'cultural difference', akin to the daughter slaughter of innocent Moslem girls – itself written off by really clever people as a mere expression of domestic violence.

This Sura simply confirms the sexual license and obsession of Muhammad:

“O Prophet! Why do you hold to be forbidden that which Allah has made lawful to you? You seek to please your consorts. But Allah is oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” [66:1]

Islam is in part of course a sex cult. Sex cults are not usually associated with religious observances. Further, this Sura has the usual rants against Unbelievers. The main import of the Koran, and its key message is that any who do not follow the Al-Lah deity, or Muhammad [both sound the same in the Koran]; will face 'torment' and certain 'hellfire'. How religious. How tolerant.

In this Sura of 12 verses only 5 preach hate speech against non-Moslems. The hate speech verses are:

Muhammad and all good Moslems who simply obey Allah [66:6] must 'strive hard against the disbelievers and be severe against them.' The disbeliever's abode is hell, their examples the disbelieving wives of Noah and Lot. They will provide the fuel for Hell and certainly slip on Hell's slippery bridge into the Fire on the Day of Judgement. How comforting, and how loving.

It is impossible to reconcile the 2 themes of this Sura with what constitutes a religion. First, Muhammad is to gratify his sexual lusts with 'gifts' of women from his alter-ego, the Al-Lah thing. Second, Muhammad commands himself and his followers to fight the Unbelievers, warning that those who do not follow his moon deity cult are doomed to be the fuel of hell-fire. Neither theme expresses anything other than grotesque intolerance and the opposite of what might be termed religious observance. 

Manage the female. Within Mein Koran, women are tools, objects and procreation devices. Men rule, women obey. That is a main theme of the pagan Meccan cult, which worships Baal [the iLah], and Muhammad [the totalitarian Jihadist, rapist, murderer, war leader etc. who today would be called 'radical'].

Nowhere in the Koran is there a pretext or legal code of 'female rights'. The best that can be said, is that a man who divorces one of his many wives, must ensure that she is taken care of, or given sustenance. This does not hold true if she has blasphemed or committed adultery.

“The Koran, and Islam in general is obviously and decidedly a misogynistic tool. There is little in the Koran which elevates women. It is quite clear that hierarchy exists within the Muslim world, with Arab males at the top and female slaves near the bottom. This Sura outlines the 'laws' regarding divorce and its first seven verses are the only verses in the Koran which one can consider to be 'nice' to women. For in these verses there are commands given by the impersonal force and thing Allah, on how men should approach a divorce – but as usual with the Koran, the text is so badly written and garbled that any number of interpretations can be collected from its reading:

.....There is no law here, just a general code of conduct. So don't divorce your women – plural – unless they have misbehaved. Notice that Islam allows men polygamy, but not females. It takes for granted the inferior status of women. In Suras 4, 9, 60 for instance which are written after this Sura, and elsewhere in the Koran, it is pretty clear that women do not have the same rights as men [they are half the value of a man]; and that a man can simply divorce a woman by saying 'I divorce you' three times. Thus the fallacy of quoting Sura 65 as an example of glowing female 'rights' within Islam is that the entire notion of female equality within the Koranic cult is false, and this Sura is anyways superseded by later Suras which in Islamic theology are far more important than earlier Suras.”

The first 7 verses are 'laws' or admonitions which are entirely at the discretion of the man who runs the household as a patriarchal monarch. He can determine what is 'lewd' or improper. There is no objective set of definitions as to what constitutes improper conduct on the part of the female.

Besides 'female management' there is the all important theme of violence against the UnBelievers. This is the 'good stuff' of Koranic theology. In this Sura of 12 verses only 4 preach hate speech against those who are either not Moslem, or dare to defy the thunderous strictures of the Al-Lah moon diety. How moderate.

Verse 11 lays out a fantastic hereafter for the pious Moslem and by contrast and default, an eternity of hellfire and doom for those who reject Allah's messenger. Severe torment awaits the Unbeliever [65:10], who is linked to evil in his disbelief [65:9]; and who will follow those in times past who 'revolted' against the 'commands' of the moon deity of Mecca. Toleration indeed.

Only those who submit and lose their individuality, free-will and rationality to the Al-Lah idol will prosper. The rest will simply be eradicated. This is a cult of intense intolerance merged with a rapturous and diabolical obsession about the Day of Judgement. It is fair to say that besides misogyny the Koran and the cult of Muhammad are fascistically and fatalistically entranced with the destruction of those who reject his prophet-hood. In that vein Islam does not differ that much from other pagan cults of communalism.