Muhammad most certainly did exist and is the mainspring of Koranic irrationality. Only an animating and quite deranged mind could have produced the verses, the revelations, and the diabolic and quite demonic culture one finds in the Koran. You cannot divorce Hitler from Mein Kampf, nor Communist manifestos from Marx or Lenin. You cannot divorce Sura 66 from the pagan fascism which is the Koran in which the individual is neutered and communalized into the theological state.

Islam is in part a cult of sex. Sura 66 reconfirms the insatiable sexual appetite of Muhammad and by extension, anyone who is a pious follower of the cult of Submission. It is the fourth chapter devoted to the problem of the female. How to manage them, how to regulate them, how to enjoy them sexually, how many can you have, what happens if you tire of one of your wives and need a divorce ? Obsessing about the female and how to constrain her is a clear indication of a cult. Religions free the individual's mind, body, spirit and soul. Cults enslave.

Islam is composed of 2 major themes, the first is Jihad and violence against non-believers with about 30% of the Koran devoted to this imperative. The second is slavery, including the sex slavery of women. In the hierarchy of Moslem power, women rank at the bottom with the Jews. The cult of Submission is in large part a cult of sexual license for men. Moslem men can have up to 4 wives; are sanctioned to have an unlimited number of both believing and non-believing sex slaves; and are encouraged to rape and satisfy themselves with Infidel women.

The Allah-thing in Sura 66 attempts to warn Muhammad's women to follow his teachings, and gives them a clear indication of what will happen if they don't:

Obviously Muhammad's harem was in revolt. So a 'revelation' conveniently appears from the Allah-thing, who declares in 66:4 that he or it, is Muhammad's protector and will use the power of angels against the harem or anyone in it, who does not support what Muhammad 'likes'. Further, this Allah-thing will replace the rebellious women with better women – namely Moslem women, devoted to Muhammad and his alter-ego the Allah. Wouldn't we all like such a revelation from our personal 'Lord' to quiet a harem revolt ?

What should a good wife do ? Act like the wife of Pharoah Ramses II, a woman who was apparently in circa 1240 B.C., a pious Moslem, 1380 years before Islam was formalized by Muhammad. She rejected her husband's polytheism and calls to the Allah-thing for help:

'Allah' as Muhammad knew it, was of course Hub'Al, the male moon deity of Mecca, an idol whose antecedents lie in the Babylonian Sin or Lord of the Moon. Sumerian and Babylonian cult worship dominated the Near East for 3500 years. Hub'Al along with the Kabaa shrine and the polytheism of the Arabs simply reflected a long history of celestial worship. Every Arab tribe had their 'ilah'. Allah's consort the sun goddess Allah was also worshipped as were their 3 daughters. It is highly unlikely that Ramses II's wife, fell to her knees and begged a concept – Allah – about which she would have no idea about [the Egyptians worshipped a variety of idols, including the Sun, but did not worship the moon].

But of course let us not forget the violence. In this Sura of 12 verses only 5 preach hate speech against non-Moslems. Some clear examples of Muhammadan violence and supremacism include:

Obey the Allah-thing, or 'Lord'. Allah does not mean 'god', it means the 'One'. This thing's prophet, the great-man Muhammad, must 'strive' against the hypocrites in the name of the One, and this war and Jihad is justified because these polytheist criminals are going to hell anyways.

There is nothing interesting or arresting in this Sura. It is another depressing refrain – Moslem men dominate their women, and when they are sexually satisfied and certain that their females support what they do, they should fight and kill the Unbelievers. This is something you would expect from a Bronze-age inspired cult.