When you criticize the state managed and financed cults; or the preferred Fascist theologies of the intellectuals; names aplenty are trebucheted in your direction. No one must dare criticize what the state deems to be the protected classes and groups; Gays, Muslims, Feminists, Green Nazis, the Abortionists, the Socialists; and those who hate Whites, Jews and Christians, are dearly coveted and coddled. The more 'victim' groups there are, the more power the state can demand, in order to facilitate their protection and erect caring, munificent programs to ensure equality and compassion.
It is a gigantic multi-cult scam. Wilders like most critics of the Meccan moon cult, desires in part, the liberation of Muslim people from their pagan-Fascist moon cult. 1.6 billion people are enslaved by the mindlessness of Islam. Imagine what these people could do once they liberated themselves and joined reality?
“Islam deprives Muslims of their freedom. That is a shame, because free people are capable of great things, as history has shown. The Arab, Turkish, Iranian, Indian, Indonesian peoples have tremendous potential. It they were not captives of Islam, if they could liberate themselves from the yoke of Islam, if they would cease to take Muhammad as a role model and if they got rid of the evil Koran, they would be able to achieve great things which would benefit not only them but the entire world.”
This is all true. Just think about how much better off the world would be without Islam. 1.6 billion freed from Jew-hate, supremacism, idiotic beliefs about the moon-cult ruling the planet, repetitive and mind-numbing ritualization and prayers. No more Muslim swagger, death threats, war with the infidel, terror, female mutilation and murder; and an end to Muslim illiteracy. The wealth and intelligence of the world would markedly increase over night, if Islam just simply disappeared from history right now.
Yet when a politician like Geert Wilders who believes in social health-care, open-trade, individual responsibility, Dutch and European culture, literacy, female equality, and free speech, denounces a theological monstrosity like the moon-cult from Mecca, he is called names such as Nazi, Fascist, Conservative, or 'Far Right'. Notice the absolute incoherency in the ad-hominem attacks. Wilders' philosophy is a mixture of agnosticism, socialism, responsible conservatism, individuality and pride in pan-European history. It is the opposite of Fascistic ideals. Fascism is of course a left-wing statist construct, similar to Communism, and derived from pagan Marxism. To call Wilders a 'Far Right' politician is only to show the ignorance of the writer and reporter involved. Wilders is anything but a statist which is what 'Far Right' actually denotes. He is the emblematic standard bearer of freedom and responsibility, not to mention Western civilizational exceptionalism. He needs to be supported not denigrated.
In a recent debate with Muslims about the moon cult Wilders made the clear distinction between the ideology and the individual. This is vital. But just as important is the clear reality that Islam is a pagan Fascism, in which its members are trapped in a cult, which is in the main, opposed to life, civilization, development, human freedom, Jews, the female and non-Muslims. The ideology is what matters. Not the individual. Why are there so few Muslims who know anything their own cult, the history of Islamic imperialism, or the racist rantings of the Koran? Is it because 50% of Muslims are illiterate? Is it because they do believe in world supremacy for Islam? Is it because they do tacitly support acts of Muslim war and terror? Is it because they did dance in the streets in places like Patterson NJ after 9-11?
“However, Muslim protests against Islamic inhumanity are rare. Most Muslims, even in Western countries, visit mosques and listen to shocking Koranic verses and to repulsive sermons without revolting against them.”
And surely that is the important point raised by Wilders. Non-Muslims can invent all the fantasies they want about 'moderates' within Islam, or write pedantic books about the 'struggle for the soul of Islam'. The problem with Islam is Islam. The problem with Islam is the Koran, the Hadiths, the Sira, the imperialist history, the cult of death, the worship of a moon object as 'God', and the complete irrationality of rituals, the Meccan pilgrimage, throwing rocks at little devils, and praying 5 times a day in a language most Muslims don't understand.
This is the truth and saying it does not mean that you hate Muslims. Quite the opposite. People enslaved are people to be pitied and if they deserve it, freed. Islam is a political system obsessed with control, racism, supremacism, and power. There is no spirituality whatsoever within Islamic culture. Muslims are knaves and slaves who need to be freed:
“There are people who say that I hate Muslims. I do not hate Muslims. It saddens me how Islam has robbed them of their dignity.What Islam does to Muslims is visible in the way they treat their daughters. On March 11, 2002, fifteen Saudi schoolgirls died as they attempted to flee from their school in the holy city of Mecca. A fire had set the building ablaze. The girls ran to the school gates but these were locked. The keys were in the possession of a male guard, who refused to open the gates because the girls were not wearing the correct Islamic dress imposed on women by Saudi law: face veils and overgarments.”
Wilders cites the important fact that the Muslim 'god', which is in fact the male moon deity of Mecca, is not even remotely close to the Judeo-Christian conception of the same. Muslims are worshipping a 5.000 year old celestial object. Al-Allah is a remote, unknowable thing – not an anthropomorphic divinity:
“I am an agnosticus myself. But Christians and Jews hold that God created man in His image. They believe that by observing themselves, as free and rational beings capable of love, they can come to know Him. They can even reason with Him, as the Jews have done throughout their history. The Koran, on the contrary, states that “Nothing can be compared with Allah” (sura 16:74, 42:11). He has absolutely nothing in common with us. It is preposterous to suppose that Allah created man in his image. The biblical concept that God is our father is not found in Islam. There is no personal relationship between man and Allah, either. The purpose of Islam is the total submission of oneself and others to the unknowable Allah, whom we must serve through total obedience to Muhammad as leader of the Islamic state (suras 3:31, 4:80, 24:62, 48:10, 57:28). And history has taught us that Muhammad was not at all a prophet of love and compassion, but a mass murderer, a tyrant and a pedophile. Muslims could not have a more deplorable role model.
Mohammed is the same of course as Hitler. The same designs, distortions, mental illnesses, lust for war, women and plunder inflicted and inflamed both men. Citing Mohammed as a Prophet, is to enumerate Hitler as one of history's great spiritual leaders. Wilders quotes Churchill's assessment of Islam after a career fighting the votaries of the Meccan moon cult in Africa and Asia. It is still valid today – Mohammed's birth and creation of Islam has been mankind's most lethal curse:
“In the late 1890s, Winston Churchill was a soldier and a war correspondent in British India (contemporary Pakistan) and the Sudan. Churchill was a perceptive young man, whose months in Pakistan and the Sudan allowed him to grasp with amazing clarity what the problem is with Islam and “the curses it lays on its votaries.”
“Besides the fanatical frenzy, …, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy,” he wrote. “The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist where the followers of the Prophet rule or live. … The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to a sole man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. … Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyzes the social development of those who follow it.” And Churchill concluded: “No stronger retrograde force exists in the world.”
Islam is regressive, perverted, retrograde and Fascist. There is no disputation of that, or what Churchill wrote. At least not for those who still live in the world of the 5 senses. Wilders is courageous in still being one of the very few politicians who desires to live in reality. The only point about Wilders' appreciation of Islam that I would disagree with is the last sentence in his debate with Muslims about the moon cult. Wilders' states, “Free yourselves. It is up to you.”
Muslims will never free themselves. They have too much to lose. Their esteem, their lust for power, their ability to sin, kill, be unethical, lie, cheat, and denigrate would be comprised. Allah deems that all actions to further Islam are acceptable. This gives the individual and the Muslim community enormous internal confidence which can be displayed as public power. There is no chance that they as a group, will give this up.
No, Wilders is wrong if he really believes that Muslims can or want to, free themselves. It is in any event an unimportant point what Muslims want. The important fact is that the West can't afford Islam – in any form. Muslims will only be freed when the West destroys Islam. And that necessary destruction will only occur through war.