Inbreeding in Islam

In times past I have covered the psychological impairment of a culture which allows the marriage of its first cousins. But it bears repeating since most people don't consider the issue of Muslim inbreeding. An excellent analysis by a Danish psychologist of Islamic inbreeding and its resulting deficiencies can be found here. 'Fetching', or bringing over first and second cousins for marriage and the establishment of polygamous marriages is endemic within Muslim communities in the West. Such 'families' also access our welfare, education and hospital systems, leading directly to systemic abuse and budget mis-allocations. We need to arrest this development immediately. One of the issues around the failed culture of Islam -- and make no mistake Islam is a complete and utter failure – is the genetic mutations and idiocy caused by mixing alleles and genes from related bloodlines. This is a fact that the 'Islam is peace and love' cult refuses even to countenance. But ignoring the travesty of inter-familial marriages in Islam, which corrupts DNA and manifests itself in irrationality, ignorance and base stupidity does not make it any less real or pertinent. Islam preys on the psychologically unfit. This is simply stating the obvious.

A person who understands genetics, Ann Barnhardt writes:

“But there is one culture, one faux "religion," that expressly condones and encourages consanguineous marriage and breeding. That system is Islam, and the document that explicitly ratifies incest is the Koran, specifically Sura 4 verse 23:

“Prohibited for you (in marriage) are your mothers, your daughters, your sisters, the sisters of your fathers, the sisters of your mothers, the daughters of your brother, the daughters of your sister, your nursing mothers, the girls who nursed from the same woman as you, the mothers of your wives, the daughters of your wives with whom you have consummated the marriage -- if the marriage has not been consummated, you may marry the daughter. Also prohibited for you are the women who were married to your genetic sons. Also, you shall not be married to two sisters at the same time -- but do not break up existing marriages.”

Sounds like an exhaustive list -- but it is not.  It is the most lax incest prohibition in all of human culture.  There is a massive omission: cousins only once removed.  In the Muslim culture, marriage and breeding between first cousins has existed since day one.  Mohammed himself married Zaynab, who was his father's sister's daughter.  Mohammed and Zaynab were direct first cousins. 

First cousin marriage for just one generation is extremely risky in and of itself.  This is why virtually every other culture on earth prohibits it, and treats it as a cultural taboo.  When two people come together who carry so many similar genetic alleles, the chance of an undesirable recessive trait expressing itself in their offspring soars.  Now, understanding that single-generational risk, understand that Muslims have been marrying their first cousins over and over again for 1,400 years.  Sit in stillness for a moment with the full, terrifying gravity of this. 

The Reproductive Health Journal reports the following rates on consanguinity in Muslim countries.  Where a statistical range has been recorded, I have used the lower parameter:

Algeria: 22.6%
Bahrain: 39.4%
Egypt (North):  20.9%
Egypt (Nubia-South): 60.5%
Iraq: 47.0%
Jordan:  28.5%
Kuwait: 22.5%
Lebanon: 12.8%
Libya: 48.4%
Mauritania: 47.2%
Morocco: 19.9%
Oman: 56.3%
Palestine: 17.5%
Qatar: 54.0%
Saudi Arabia: 42.1%
Sudan: 44.2%
Syria: 30.3%
Tunisia: 20.1%
United Arab Emirates: 40.0%
Yemen: 40.0%

Muslim men are never, ever allowed to be around, see, converse with or otherwise interact with any females outside of their families.  However, they are permitted to act as chaperones for their female first cousins.  If your first cousin is the only person of the opposite sex you ever get to interact with, is it any surprise that Muslims are marrying their first cousins more as the rule than as the exception?

According to the BBC, 55% of Pakistani-Britons are married to a first cousin, and as a corollary to that produce "just under a third" of all children in the UK with genetic illnesses, despite being only 3% of the total births.” [bold is mine]

Inbreeding has huge and quite deleterious consequences. The existence of inbreeding and the inter-genetic mutations is to my mind, a hallmark of a cult. This is an obvious statement but not many will utter it. Advanced cultures outlaw intra-family sex for good reasons. Disease, deformity, recessive gene expressions, and base stupidity are the results of mixing the same bloodlines:

“The high amount of mentally retarded and handicapped royalties throughout European history shows the unhealthy consequences of this practice. Luckily, the royal families have now allowed themselves to marry for love and not just for status.

The Muslim culture still practices inbreeding and has been doing so for longer than any Egyptian dynasty. This practice also predates the world's oldest monarchy (the Danish) by 300 years.

A rough estimate shows that close to half of all Muslims in the world are inbred: In Pakistan, 70 percent of all marriages are between first cousins (so-called "consanguinity") and in Turkey the amount is between 25-30 percent (Jyllands-Posten, 27/2 2009 More stillbirths among immigrants)"

An essential element in Islam's totalitarian failure is inbreeding. Such a practice denotes a pagan pre-modern cult which is utterly ignorant of science, genes, and desirable social outcomes from monogamous, not polygamous, marriages. It also produces a culture that 'sells' young first cousin females to older male cousins or relatives. It denies 'courting', the easy mixing of sexes, the inter-gender discourse that Western children experience from a very young age, which produces a healthy and quite active awareness not only of sexual differences, but also of the need for inter-gender respect, tolerance and emotional management. Thus the culture in the West between and amongst the sexes is entirely different than one will view within the Islamic world. None of these Western attributes can be found in Islamic culture. Women are boarded up like old houses, clothed in bed sheets, kept separate from men, and routinely raped, beaten and kept illiterate by their male family members, including often-times, the first cousin husband. This is barbarism. This says nothing about the savagery of dis-honor killings, mutilations, stonings and other Islamic cultural relics of the stone age, which still inform Muslim society.

It is clear that the entire edifice of Islamic culture is built around the subjugation and humiliation of the female; the servile status of women which leads to illiteracy and a lack of opportunity, and the degrading spectacle of sex between bloodlines. In short women are chattel and blood lines trump all. Interbreeding simply highlights and indeed exacerbates the social chaos and neolithic paganism which is the ethos of Arabia's moon cult. In this vein, anyone who bellows that importing more such members into the West, or extolling their failure as a a' religion' is an idiot – akin to what 50% of the Muslim world is producing through same-bloodline sex and has been for 1400 years.