Running totals from Sura 2 to 20:
Total number of verses from Sura 2 to 20: 2476
Total number of verses in 2-20, which preach violence against non-Moslems: 526
Violent verses as a % of total from Sura 2 to 20: 21.2%
Sura 2 to 20 as a % of the Koran in pages: 49%
Sura 2 to 20 as a % of the 6346 verses in the Koran: 39%
[meaning still lots more violence to go....]
Sura 20 is yet another [big yawn], screed against the Jews, and an exposition as to why Muhammad and his Meccan cult is superior to Judaism. A consistent repetition of intolerance is rather irreligious. The 3 main themes are: 1) All Jewish and Christian prophets were Moslem, 2) Satan corrupted mankind and especially the Jews and Christians leading them 'astray' and forming an alliance with them against Moslems [20:114-130] and 3) the Koran and following Muhammad is 'proof' of Allah [21:113] and that all Moslems who follow unquestioningly the commands of this book will be 'saved'. In other words nothing new is to be discovered in this chapter. Certainly no religious or ethical ideal will be uncovered.
Sura 20 reviewed previously can be summarized below:
“Ta ha ha and Ti hee hee. Mystical giggles as the writers of the Arab universalist manifesto unite in gibberish. The Koran is apparently the mystical set of letters and yes as one would have guessed, the Torah and Christian Bible are really just Allah's mystical letters arranged incorrectly. That big joker Allah saved the right orientation of the mystical script for the Koran and as logic would dictate, he gave it to an illiterate 7th century madman named Mohammed. Ta ha ha indeed. Therefore the mystical Koran is uber alles."
Moslem dialecticism. Moslem myth maintains that everyone is born a Moslem. Therefore if you reject the Allah cult you are doomed. This in itself is fatalistic and circular reasoning. How can I be born into a moon/Allah/Muhammad cult when I and my general society have no idea what Islam is for example ? Islam is a human political-social construct. Not a natural law. The creation of this mythical Moslem 'law' that all humans are really Moslems, is no more than a 'rationale' for the supremacism and expansionist ideas within the Moslem cult. In this vein Moses some 2000-2900 years before Muhammad founded his cult of Submission [lots of dispute as to when he actually lived]; and Jesus some 610 years before Muhammad initiated his intolerant group; are rewritten to be born into the Allah cult and thus raised by the moon deity to be exponents of a theology which has about as much in common with Judeo-Christianity as say Chinghis Khan's Sky God theology, or the pagan fantasies of Nazism; or the dialectical inanity and insanity of Russian National Socialism. The teachings of both Moses and Christ are the exact polar opposite of those of the mad totalitarian Muhammad. Islam is truly the anti-Christ theology.
This is clear to anyone who bothers to read the Koran or about Islamic history. In this chapter of Taha, Teehee, HoHoHo we don't find many laughs or any expressions of religious doctrine. We do however discover about 20 verses which target non Moslems for violence - some of them even uttered by Moses. Moses is now rewritten to be the defender and aggressive imperialist for Allah. He chides and scolds the Pharaoh, the Hebrews and the pagans for not following Allah – or Hubal the moon deity of Mecca. If this sounds deranged it is because it most assuredly is.
Moses angry at those not following the moon deity of Mecca:
Other verses preaching violence against the Infidel:
The above is clear. Islam is the dialectical successor to Judaism and Christianity. Moses was not a Hebrew prophet leading enslaved or partially free Hebrew workers, farmers and engineers out of Ramses' empire into Canaan. The Hebrews had likely been a Canaanite lower caste at some point in history. He was instead a moon deity devotee, imbued with Koranic knowledge some 2900 to 2000 years before the Koran was invented by Muhammad and his acolytes in Arabic. Thus the Judaism of the Torah is corrupted and false and the Koranic theology holy and good.
Yet we are told that this is a religious and not a political document. Why ? None of the attributes of a religion make their presence known in this chapter.