Should Moslems be banned from the USA pace Trump ? Or for that matter the UK, Canada, Australia,
France, Russia and any serious nation state ?
Of course. Islam and Moslems do
not assimilate, they conquer. 1400 years
of history, and the lurid, insane and violent supremacism of Mein Koran, make
that rather obvious. The EU[rinal] has
lost swathes of its urban core to Muhammadism, surrendered from ignorance,
illiteracy, cowardice and apathy. Its culture
is being eradicated. Western Moslems for
instance, overwhelmingly support
Sharia Barbarism according to a recent Pew study.
But what of the favorite Cultural Marxist term, ‘nuance’? Everything is ‘nuanced’ according to these ‘political
scientists’. Consider the ‘nuance’ of a
vast cult system named Submission, comprising 1.6 billion acolytes and deluded
devotees of various stripes and hues. Surely
there must be a moderate Islam in that complex accumulation ?
In short, there can never be a ‘nuanced’ version of Muhammadism. Islam is Mein Koran and Mein Koran is
Islam. Muhammad is Islam, and Islam is
Muhammad. There might be mild variations
on these themes, some differences in cult emphasis, or in the pure
understanding of Mein Koran; but Islam is in-toto, simply Islam. As Turkey’s PM Erdogan has often stated, ‘There
is no moderate Islam’. A belief held by
most Sunnis. But what of non Sunnis ?
Timothy Furnish Phd in ‘Sects,
Lies and the Caliphate’, makes the following rather clear-headed
explanations as to why Islam is the issue, not just the Sunni brand of
Muhammadism. He does however, propose
that Trump’s ban should not be imposed on non Sunnis. This seems rather ridiculous, since Mein Koran
and Muhammad-worship are the key problems within Islam.
‘….a literalist reading and application of the
Qur’an and the Hadiths (the alleged sayings and practices of Islam’s founder,
Muhammad). This means that canonical Islamic endorsement of beheading, stoning,
and violent jihad, inter
alia, must apply across space and time; they are not
subject to, say, allegorical interpretation or chronological consignment to the
7th century AD.’
‘There are minority sects of Islam which
do not take the Qur’an 100% literally and are thereby not yoked to slavish
imitation of the texts, with all their problematic repercussions: the Ahmadis
of South Asia; the Isma’ilis, the second-largest Shi`a sect; the syncretistic
Alawis and Druze of Syria and Lebanon; many Sufi, or Islamic mystical, orders
(which are actually not sects so much as, in a sense, charismatic Muslims);
and, believe it or not, the Twelvers—the Shi`is of Iran, Iraq, Bahrain, Lebanon
and Azerbaijan—who unlike the Sunnis never abandoned ta`wil,
or “(allegorical) interpretation” of the Islamic texts.’
More discussion and points from Furnish here.
The Moslem groups mentioned by Furnish, are persecuted, even
within Western Europe, by Sunnis.
However, Shia violence, and general Moslem violence against non-Moslems,
is of course not confined only to Sunnis.
Consider Iran, a Shia state which will try to obliterate Israel and has
exterminated Christians within Iran and would have little problem in committing
faithocide against a Christian population elsewhere. Or Lebanon, where Shias supported by Iran
have destroyed Christianity and the once-largely Christian culture of that
state.
The problem with Islam is Muhammad-worship, Mein Koran and
Moslem culture. Whether the cultural
contagion is virulent, or less than virulent matters not. Culture is indeed King, and when you allow a
Bronze Age fascist-supremacism, which should be called Muhammadism, into your
culture, you are allowing a bacillus to be poured into your blood. The end result will be the same as the
Germans smuggling Lenin into the failed Tsarist state in 1917.
The hatred of the Infidel runs throughout the entire width and
breadth of Muhammadism. There is no ‘moderate’
Islam.
