French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was  superior to anything Islam had developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions.  Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'.  Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.   

Back     Printer Friendly Version  

Thursday, July 17, 2014

Bookmark and Share

The real cause of the Crusades was Islam of course. The moon cult's Jihad.

Islam is to blame for the long-overdue Christian response to its Jihad.

by Ferdinand III

Phds have compiled nonsensical, fantastical and factually irrelevant books on the Crusades. In one survey I performed, out of 40 'scholarly' Phd works, 80% were decidedly negative. These were not histories designed to inform or present a balanced view, but to slander, denigrate, calumny and falsify history. Most of these Phds – the value of which is certainly arguable – would not be writing in their vernacular, in the ease and comfort of a digitized modern-world order, without the Crusades. Their ignorance extends beyond Marxist rewriting and post-modern cant, to the support of a cult which has the expressed theological view of wiping out their entire world. Moronic. No wonder Phds are viewed as little more than expensive exercises in Marxist rubber-stamping.

Without the Moslem Jihad the Crusades, totalling 7-9 depending on who does the counting, are unnecessary. They would not exist. The Moslem Jihad or Crusade is still on-going, yet the Phds do not take this into account. One would assume that a cult embroiled in 1400 years of war is to be held responsible for not only its own irrational, non-spiritual violence, but the reaction of its enemies. Would you please be passive whilst I kill you says the ever-benign Jihadist to his victim. The Marxist Phd would reply, 'surely, all in the name of tolerance'.

Here are the causes of the Crusades:

-Christian civilization wiped out between Syria and southern France from 634 AD to 737 AD.

-Between 10-15 million Christians were enslaved by the moon cult, including including young girls for sex harems during the 1400 year Moslem occupation of the same territory.

-Between 1550-1750 alone, over 1 million Christians were enslaved by Moslems just in North Africa [see Davies' book 'Christian Slaves, Moslem Masters'].

-We know that the population centres of places like Hungary declined by half over the same period thanks to Ottoman invasions and slave trading – 3 million disappeared from central Europe alone during this period.

-Moslems filled slave markets over 1400 years with captured Slavs, especially coveted for their beauty and the women for their sex-slavery. At least 5 million Slavs over 1400 years or 3.000 per annum on average [ a very modest yearly take for the Moslems], were enslaved by the Moslems.

-An estimated 30.000 Churches were pulled down between Syria and France by the ever-tolerant Moslem between 634 and 720 AD, including the holiest of sites, the Holy Sepulchre in 1003-4.

-Moslems built mosques on top of churches – for Marxist Phds this is passed off as 'massive construction', not the supremacist act that it most certainly is.

-Under the Sharia Law and the pact of Umar, Christians were second-class knaves who paid a Jizya or poll-tax and were open to other taxes, Moslem predations and had to treat Moslems as their superiors.

-3.000 Christian pilgrims were slaughtered on their way to Jerusalem in 1064. They joined the thousands of other Christians who had been killed whilst on pilgrimmage to Jerusalem since 700 AD.

-The Turks obliterated the poorly-led Greek Orthodox army at Manzikert in 1071. The Byzantine empire was near death at this point. Calls for aid went to Rome and the West. The message was basically 'first us, then you'.

-The Mediterranean littoral was subject to unending Moslem attacks, slave-trading, campaigns of rape and destruction. Trade was cut off with Europe. As Pirenne and others have proven vital staples such as papyrus, gold and silver disappear from the European economy during this period, causing ruminations of a 'dark age'.

One can go on, the above list is incomplete. In any event we get the idea. The Jihad in all its evil, bloody, satanic gore, prompted a response. The Crusade slaughter of 3-4000 innocents in Jerusalem in 1099, after a year of endless travail, battles, near-death experiences including starvation and Moslem encirclement, was hardly a high point of Christian piety. But the streets did not run with blood. On the other hand one can create a very long list of Moslem slaughters of Christians 5-10 x in number of what occurred in Jerusalem. Antioch, Tyre, Edessa, Rhodes, Cyprus, Malta, Constantinople, and cities stretching from Edirna to the gates of Vienna.

The Moslem slaughter of Christians was far worse than anything the Crusades enacted. But you won't hear about it.

Article Comments:

Related Articles:


7/22/2023:  Seven Myths of the Crusades (Myths of History: A Hackett Series), Alfred J. Andrea and Andrew Holt

7/1/2023:  Skanderbeg, the unknown Christian Albanian warrior and hero

4/25/2023:  St. Ferdinand III. The greatest of the Crusaders.

4/6/2023:  Alfonso VI and the Christian war to save civilisation in Spain

4/3/2023:  Don Pelayo, Spain and the Muslim Jihad of the 8th century

11/20/2016:  The Crusades in Christian perspective

6/28/2016:  Atheist-Protestant lies about the Crusades - all to further the victimhood status of the Moon cult

5/1/2015:  Belloc and the glory of the Crusades and the liberation of Christians.

4/23/2015:  The Legend of Don Pelayo, by Marian Horvat, Phd.

4/13/2015:  Why the Crusades were necessary. No Islam, no Jihad, no necessity for the Crusades.

3/6/2015:  Witless Westerners, the 'sack of Jerusalem', and Moslem propaganda.

3/4/2015:  The Crusades, Jerusalem and the myth of 'rivers of blood'

2/27/2015:  'Glory of the Crusades', Steve Weidenkopf. Why did they go?

2/25/2015:  'Glory of the Crusades', Steve Weidenkopf Phd [appeal to authority!]

7/17/2014:  The real cause of the Crusades was Islam of course. The moon cult's Jihad.

6/9/2014:  Tyerman and Crusading, in 'The Medieval World' edited by Peter Linehan, Janet L. Nelson, 2013

7/1/2013:  Ernle Bradford: 'The Great Siege of Malta'.

6/5/2011:  The Monks of War, by Desmond Seward

5/6/2011:  Teutonic Knights: Desmond Seward's 'The Monks of War', 1972, Penguin books.

4/25/2011:  The Albigensian Crusade and Cultural Marxism

4/20/2011:  Thomas Madden, 'The New Concise History of the Crusades', and Sultan Baibars.

4/15/2011:  Thomas J. Madden's, The Concise History of the Crusades, 2005. Part One.

3/17/2011:  Book Review: 'The Crusades', by Michael Paine, Chartwell Books 2006, 137 pages.

1/13/2011:  January 13th 1128, the Pope recognizes the Knights Templar.

1/9/2011:  The Crusades - the necessity of fighting back.

1/8/2011:  Review: 'The Crusades' by Johnathan Riley-Smith 2nd edition.

1/2/2011:  Michael Haag: 'The Templars' - part 2.

12/29/2010:  'The Templars', by Michael Haag

12/4/2010:  Joseph Attard, 'The Knights of Malta'

11/24/2010:  Cavaliero's, the Knights of Malta or 'The Last of the Crusaders' – prosperity and benign governance.

11/23/2010:  Review: Roderick Cavaliero's 'The Last of the Crusaders and the Knights of St. John'

10/27/2010:  A first-hand account: “The [Great] Siege of Malta 1565”, by Francisco Balbi di Correggio

10/13/2010:  The Knights of Malta (1530-1798). Integral to Western development.

10/12/2010:  Hospitallers part 2: The Knights of Cyprus and Rhodes (1309-1522)

10/11/2010:  A brief history of the Hospitallers and the Knights of St. John.

10/10/2010:  David Nicolle, 'Knights of Jerusalem, the Crusading Order of Hospitallers 1100-1565.'

9/17/2010:  Nicholas Kristof and the Lame-Stream media hatred of the Crusades.

9/9/2010:  'Holy Warriors: A Modern History of The Crusades', by Johnathan Phillips

8/3/2010:  Review: 'Making War in the Name of God', Christopher Catherwood

7/29/2010:  1204 and the Crusader 'sack' of Constantinople. A necessity.

7/12/2010:  Roger Crowley: 'Constantinople, The Last Great Siege 1453'

7/3/2010:  Thomas Asbridge: 'The First Crusade'. Simply bloody awful.

6/19/2010:  The beautiful Crusades and saving civilization.

6/18/2010:  Christopher Tyerman, "God's War: A New History of the Crusades" - Read it.

6/17/2010:  Piers Paul Read: 'The Templars'. A great 'Read'.

6/16/2010:  Book Review: 'The Crusades', by Michael Paine, Chartwell Books 2006, 137 pages.

6/3/2010:  Medieval Italy; why did the Christian north succeed where the Orientalized south failed ?

5/11/2010:  Book Review: 'The Crusaders' by Regine Pernoud.

4/19/2010:  Book Review; Regine Pernoud, 'Those terrible Middle Ages'

4/11/2010:  Book Review: “The Templars” by Regine Pernoud, English edition 2009.

4/4/2010:  July 15 1099 – one of the great days in history. Jerusalem retaken.

4/3/2010:  Book Review: Empires of the Sea, by Roger Crowley. [The Final Battle for the Mediterranean]

3/20/2010:  Review: Rodney Stark's 'God's Battalions – The Case for the Crusades'

3/16/2010:  Why the Crusades were a success.

4/24/2009:  Byzantium: The Decline and Fall by John Julius Norwich, 450 pgs, 1996.

3/17/2009:  Common myths about the Seven Crusades which occurred 1095 to 1299