Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was superior to anything Islam had developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions. Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'. Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.
Muslims want to:
Yet if you object to 1400 years of Jihad, destruction, annihilation of Christianity and other non-Muslims systems and religions, you are the problem. You are phobic. You have a mental problem. When 5000 Black Christian Nigerians are raped and slaughtered this year by Black Nigerian Muslims, it is the fault of the Black Christian Nigerians. After all, the climate made the Muslims burn down their churches with priests inside, rape their women and take over their lands. Or if not the climate, than 'tribal warfare' and 'inter-tribal conflicts'.
Historian Efraim Karsh summarises just how stupid 'Islamophobia' as a term is:
Styling himself the “Seal of the Prophets”, sent by God to pass his ultimate message to humankind, Muhammad expanded Islam from a purely Arab creed to a universal religion that knew no territorial or national boundaries. He also established the community of believers, or the umma, as the political framework for the practice of this religion in all territories it conquered; and he devised the concept of jihad, “exertion in the path of Allah”, as he called his god, as the primary vehicle for the spread of Islam. Muhammad introduced this concept shortly after his migration to Medina as a means to entice his local followers into raiding the Meccan caravans, developing and amplifying it with the expansion of his political ambitions until it became a rallying call for world domination. As he told his followers in his farewell address: “I was ordered to fight all men until they say, ‘There is no god but Allah.’”
In doing so, Muhammad at once tapped into the Middle East’s millenarian legacy and ensured its perpetuation for many centuries to come. From the first Arab-Islamic empire of the mid-seventh century to the Ottomans, the last great Muslim empire, the story of Islam has been the story of the rise and fall of universal empires and, no less important, of imperialist dreams. Politics during this lengthy period was characterised by a constant struggle for regional, if not world mastery in which the dominant power sought to subdue, and preferably eliminate, all potential challengers. …
It is true that this pattern of historical development is not uniquely Middle Eastern or Islamic. Other parts of the world, Europe in particular, have had their share of imperial powers and imperialist expansion, while Christianity’s universal vision is no less sweeping than that of Islam. The worlds of Christianity and Islam, however, have developed differently in one fundamental respect. The Christian faith won over an existing empire in an extremely slow and painful process, and its universalism was originally conceived in purely spiritual terms that made a clear distinction between God and Caesar. By the time it was embraced by the Byzantine emperors as a tool for buttressing their imperial claims, three centuries after its foundation, Christianity had in place a countervailing ecclesiastical institution with an abiding authority over the wills and actions of all believers.
The birth of Islam, by contrast, was inextricably linked with the creation of a world empire and its universalism was inherently imperialist. It did not distinguish between temporal and religious powers, which were combined in the person of Muhammad, who derived his authority directly from Allah and acted at one and the same time as head of the state and head of the church. This allowed the prophet to cloak his political ambitions with a religious aura and to channel Islam’s energies into its instrument of aggressive expansion, there being no internal organism of equal force to counterbalance it.
Whereas Jesus spoke of the Kingdom of God, Muhammad used God’s name to build an earthly kingdom. He spent the last 10 years of his life fighting to unify Arabia under his reign. Had it not been for his sudden death on June 8th 632, he would have most probably expanded his rule well beyond the peninsula. Even so, within a decade of Muhammad’s death, a vast empire, stretching from Iran to Egypt and from Yemen to northern Syria, had come into being under the banner of Islam in one of the most remarkable examples of empire-building in world history. Long after the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the abolition of the Caliphate in the wake of World War I, the link between religion, politics and society remains very much alive in the Muslim and Arab worlds.
If Christendom was slower than Islam in marrying religious universalism with political imperialism, it was faster in shedding both notions. By the 18th century, the West had lost its religious messianism. Apart from in the Third Reich, it had lost its imperial ambitions by the mid-20th century. Islam has retained its imperialist ambition to this day.
Imperialist. Militarist. Totalitarian. Pagan. Quite Fascist. This is the cult of Muhammad. It has no alignment, whatsoever, with a modern society.
...a uniform civilization developed throughout the centuries by all non-Muslim indigenous people, who were vanquished by jihad-war and governed by shari'a law. It is this civilization which is called dhimmitude. It is characterized by the different strategies developed by each dhimmi group to survive as non-Muslim entity in their Islamized countries. Dhimmitude is not exclusively concerned with Muslim history and civilization. Rather it investigates the history of those non-Muslim peoples conquered and colonized by jihad. [See Baat Yeor].
Coronatude:
...a uniform civilization developed throughout the past 6 decades in all G20 countries, who were vanquished by government propaganda, oppression, criminal pharmaceutical firms and endless drugs posing as ‘vaccines’… leading to ‘vaccine law’. It is this civilization which is called Coronatude. It is characterized by the different strategies developed by each conquered group within the G20, to survive as non-vaxxed entity in their Vaccinated countries. Coronatude is not exclusively concerned with vaccine history and civilization. Rather it investigates the history of those non-vaxxed peoples conquered and colonized by government and pharma. [See myself].
From Dhimmitude to Coronatude. For many it is simply a straight line, an extension, another stamp on their card of ‘political acceptance’ or ‘science’. They see nothing wrong with the Muslim or Pharma-Government Jihad. Both are perfectly sensible in their opinion. Both are justified by ‘science’ and the ‘crimes’ of Christians or the unjabbed. Both are necessary to correct historical ‘wrongs’. Both are valid to ‘improve civilisation’, ‘health’, ‘diversity’, and amend our own ‘bias’.
The cults usually parading around with banners declaring ‘science’, who support Corona Fascism (death rate of 0.1% which negates the idea of a pandemic), evolution (the magic of multi-cellular functionality inside billions-soon trillions of years), warming from a rounding error trace chemical 95% emitted by Gaia; are usually the same groups who support the ‘religion’ of Muhammadanism and open-borders. Not always. But more often than not, this is true. These groups have overlapping memberships and personnel and are often found ‘co-existing’ within major ‘political’ parties as part of their standard platforms and pablum. Few if any of the media, corporate leaders or politicians are not from these same groups.
The reason these fellow travellers flock together under the same set of standards is straightforward. None of these groups and their acolytes possess critical thinking skills, nor do most live in the world of the 5 senses. They are ignorant of history, data, real science and basic biology. They hypocritically hate white-Christian premised civilisation and want to tear it down (warming, ‘green energy’, ‘open borders’, anti-Christian, anti-white racism) while enjoying its benefices. They are the modern communist revolutionary, demanding a ‘great reset’, of what exactly, why, and to the benefit of whom, they can’t say. Most of these quasi-literates classify themselves as ‘liberals’ which is a word without meaning, only edified when one analyses their programmes which are quite fascistic in political orientation. All their programmes centre on government control, mass compliance and hypnosis and endless drugging and terrorising. There is nothing ‘liberal’, ‘intelligent’, or ‘progressive’ in the demented minds of these modern Robespierres, Lenins or Nazis. They are the same age-old detritus who are attracted to cults of oppression and totalitarianism including Corona, Green movements and Muhammadanism.
In 1400 years of Muslim Jihad there are at least 25 million Christian Whites taken as slaves by Muslim Jihad, ranging from the Mongolian, to the Turkish, Arab and North African. The Spanish Jihad from 710 AD to 1492 AD, history’s longest war, was composed of Arabs, Berbers and Blacks. It is hard to calculate the cost in slavery and destruction during these 800 years. Modern ‘historians’, ‘commentators’ and ‘experts’, only genuflect to the ‘great influence’ Muslims had on Spain. They ignore the rape, the war, the slaughter and the destruction of countless buildings and art. Over 800 years no fewer than 5.000 Christians per annum, would be enslaved in the yearly ‘razzias’ from Muslim occupied Hispania into Christian enclaves. This is a low estimate. We therefore have just in Spain, some 4 million Christians over 800 years taken as slaves.
In Spain alone, over 800 years, some 4 million White Christians were enslaved by Black, Arab, and Berbers (Romano-indigenous mix).
No knee bending by Blacks, Arabs or Muslims to White Christians. In fact, the opposite. A complete disavowal of this slavery. A complaint that it was the fault of the enslaved, with the rapacious, ‘anti-science’ Roman Catholic Church, being in the way of the great, ‘intellectual’, ‘achievements’, of illiterate Arabs and Bedouin, who were stupefied by the wealth, the art, the buildings and the cities of 8th century Spain. In this revisionism, the vast economic and social wealth of Spain was not due to Romano-Visigothic civilisation, but amazingly imported on the swords of Muhammadanism.
No one discusses the Muslim Jihad, rape and slaughter. In such a dystopian fantasy, it is therefore to be expected, that open borders, more ‘Muslims’, more ‘diversity’, are the only ‘accepted science’, even as Muslim rape, crime, welfare payments and the destruction of Churches including Notre Dame across Western states, continues to set records and only increases in quantity and volume. To promote any other policy is to be a ‘racist’, a ‘phobe’, an ‘ultra right nationalist’, and probably a ‘Nazi’.
The same litany of ignorance is displayed by the same people in their slavish obeisance to a fake pandemic. The people who accept the Corona narrative, ignore the dead and wounded from Pharma-poisons, who imbibe with religious fervour the anti-science of Fake News and totalitarian governments, and who openly wish for their own imprisonment, are hardly the sort of people who built civilisation. Quite the opposite. They are the same people advocating for the Muslimification of the West and the imposition of Medical Nazism. These people are as far removed from being intelligent, as Muhammadanism is from peace.
Keeping up with Muslim New-speak is very difficult. Muslims are masters at propaganda – with the Saudi's the master black magicians of the art of deception. Iranian propaganda money also saturates Western institutions. Every event or conflict involving the followers of the male Meccan moon deity and Mohammedanism is recast by the Muslims as a struggle between 'faith' and bigotry, [Islam and Western civilization]; 'enlightenment' and ignorance; or cultural freedom and oppression [Muslims vs. The Rest]. In Western society the ability of Muslims to use New-speak is astounding. What is insane is the acceptance of such nonsense by academia, politicians and the fake news media.
Muslim newspeak in North America and Europe is controlled by various Muslim groups who purport to speak for millions of Muslims resident in the West. Examples are CAIR, ISNA or the MSA. These groups are largely funded by the Saudis, Iranians or terror organisations. FBI and other investigations reveal that the linkages between 'moderate' Muslim groups and Islamo-fascist and radical organisations are legion and deep.
Western domiciled Muslims constantly whine about being 'targets' of 'white' 'racism. The Muhammadan cult is of course, not a ‘race’ so racism cannot be the issue when discussing the cult itself, composed as it is of Arabs, Indians, Blacks, Whites and Asians. Islam as a movement, is a clearly a political-ideology of power and control. Any cursory reading of Islamic history and the Koran would dispel the notion that Islam is a faith.
Typical Moslem justifications for any act of Islamic terror would include the following Newspeak dupes:
-Not all Muslims are terrorists
-Islam is 'reacting' against Western aggression
-Muslims are largely peaceful and charitable
-Most Muslims are 'moderate'
-This was due to mental illness or misunderstanding Mein Koran
-Drugs and alcohol were involved
-‘Racism’ prompted this violent action
-This is an 'isolated' case
-'They' are not real Muslims
-The welfare state is insufficiently generous and solicitous of Muslims and this creates aggravation and resentment
The same list could have been used to justify Hitlerism; Stalinism; and Chinese Maoist fascism, and dozens of other fascisms so coveted and caressed by leftists and multi-culturalists. Not all Shinto Japanese in 1941 were anti-Western or as extremist as the military junta. Nazis were comprised of peaceful teachers, scientists, soccer players, actors and businessmen who were not as 'extreme' as Goering or Hitler. Russian grandmothers in 1970 had little inclination to world domination or the overthrow of American democracy. Chinese entrepreneurs today, are probably uninterested in invading Taiwan, overturning US elections, or working with the US deep state to embed socialist-communism in the USA. Ergo I would expect that most Muslims living in the West are not 'the same' as the 'radicals', evident and so active over 1400 years of Islamic imperialism and Jihad.
So what. It is the theology of the cult which matters. Not the individual. This is especially true if the individual does nothing to reform the cult, its documents, its rituals, and its expectations. Thus the singular 'moderate' Muslim who tells you what you want to hear, and appears pious, plays the piano, dresses well and appears civilized, is hardly important in the grand scheme of his cult. If he is not determined to rewrite the Koran, reform the Hadiths, open up Islam to inquiry and even ridicule, then he too is part of the problem.
Since 9-11 there have been 40.000 Muslim attacks across the world. Slavery still goes on, even within the West, in the sex trading for marriage of young girls. I know because I have met some of these victims. Moslems, Arabs and Blacks own, today, right now, some 5-10 million Black slaves in Africa. Hindu girls in their thousands in East India have disappeared, taken as prisoners by Muslim Bangladeshis, raped, and forced to join Islam [to produce male Ghazi or Muslim warriors]. Attacks and racism against Jews and Christians are weekly events across the world. Yet not one single Muslim demonstration by these vaunted moderates has taken place anywhere in the Western world since 9-11. Not a single one.
Yet we are assured, 'all' Muslims are 'moderates'. Muslims are establishing radicalized schools all across the Western world teaching pure Islamic doctrine, which is by itself anti-Western, racist and supremacist. The media and politicians describe these schools as 'moderate'. In Europe every large city has more than a dozen of them, many funded by both Saudi-Wahabbi money, and state money. Many have deep connections to various Islamic-fascist groups overseas. In fact, the number of Muslim organisations and schools with connections to 'radical' Islam within the West are now are almost too many to count. Thirty years ago, there was only a handful. Yes, there is a Moslem tide, an invasion, a takeover of Western urban areas. London UK currently has 500 mosques, implying a total Muslim population of 2.5 million, in a city of 10 million. 30 years ago, the Muslim presence in London was minimal.
There is no proof that 'moderate' Muslim groups exist and if they do, they are poor, under-funded, under-manned, and largely silenced. Blasphemy rules apply in Islam. You cannot criticise Muhammad, Mein Koran or Islamic theology. The penalty is death.
Moderate Islam might be what the 'mass' of Muslims desire, but there is precious little proof that this 'mainstream' Islam wants anything else other than more power, more state funding; more mosques; more adherents and widespread Koranic practice embedded in Sharia Law. Nothing is more obviously a threat to Western civilisation than the imposition of a totalitarian creed premised on pre-7th century codes which are not even laws in the modern sense; designed to meld together, church and state. Nothing is moderate about such a construction.
The only moderate Muslim is one who will agree to rewrite the Koran, the Hadiths and open up Islam to inquiry, ridicule and reformation and separate the church from the state. That is the only definition of a moderate Muslim. Period.