Early Christian influencers of Natural Philosophy and Science

No Catholic Church. No Universities and Science.

Sunday, February 16, 2025 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

Christianity is the only worldview and only religion in history to propound and expand natural philosophy into the sciences.  Christianity is the only true religion of course, and so it is no surprise that early Christians wanted to uncover the secret of God’s created world.  The perfect design they found in nature and their own bodies, compelled investigations. 

The Christian worldview was premised as much on reason as faith.  Saint Augustine of Hippo in the 4^th century advocated interpreting scripture with reality as he synthesised Platonic philosophy with Catholic teaching.  In the 13^th century Saint Thomas Acquinas aligned Aristotle’s philosophy and Greek science with Catholic beliefs, using physics, scientific concepts and reason, to support the existence of the Christian God.  In between Augustine and Acquinas, stretching some 800 years, the objective historian can see the great progress made from paganism and mystical beliefs to concrete experimentation and investigation. 

Boethius (480 to 525 AD)

Romano-Christian aristocrat who wrote ‘The Consolation of Philosophy’, which discusses aspects of Christian-stoicism and why free will is necessary.  Composed texts on music and mathematics which were used for almost a millennia in schools.  Completed some translations of Aristotle from Greek into Latin.  Boethius’ works were copied and translated by Alfred the Great in England during the middle to late 9^th century. 

Saint Augustine (354-430 AD)

Bishop of Hippo, synthesised Platonic and neo-Platonic philosophy with Catholic teaching.  Accepted pagan science as true even if it seemed to contradict scripture.  Did not believe in a literal reading of every book in the Bible if it contradicted reason, common sense or observations.  Ambivalent about free will.

Gerbert of Aurillac (940 to 1003 AD)

Born in the lower class, rose to become Pope and a significant contributor to science and mathematics.  Wrote an instruction manual for astrolabes which the Byzantine Christians had been using since the 5^th century.  Built spherical models of the Earth and universe.  Promoted both astronomy and mathematics to describe natural phenomena. 

As with most people of his time, did not believe that the Earth had to be in the centre of the universe, and that if it was immobile (telescopes were long in the future), it should be raised up to the stars (exalted), not found ‘lower down’.

Saint Anselm of Canterbury (1033-1109)

Italian born, a student of Lanfranc, Anselm became Bishop of Canterbury and used reason to support the existence of God.  In the Proslogion, Anselm utilises pure logic, or ‘ontology’, to prove that God must exist.  This work was to provide logical support for those who believed in God.  His arguments use aspects of Aristotle’s philosophy.  He marks a departure within European philosopher and metaphysics, from Plato to Aristotle.  Anselm felt the best way to know God was through prayer, meditation and fasting.

Peter Abelard (1079-1142 AD)

Catholic intellectual who criticised scripture and texts which seem to contradict each other.  His commentaries Sic ou Non (Yes or No), were mandatory reading for medieval students at the University of Paris and beyond.  Abelard believed in logical rationalism in all spheres of life including faith.  All Catholic dogma, including the Trinity, should be analysed and scrutinised for logical, rational or factual errors or misrepresentations. 

William of Conches (1085-1154)

Educated at the Cathedral school of Chartres, Conches attempted to align Platonic philosophy found in Timaeus, one of the first and for a time, only translated work of Greek philosophy, with the creation account in Genesis.  It was a difficult if impossible task, given that Plato who believed in a creator, had God using existing material and was a passive God, more of Newton’s divine clock maker, than the interactive God of Christianity.  Conches developed ideas about the first mover (God) and secondary movers (events, or processes after God’s activity), and natural laws emanating from God’s creation. 

Adelard of Bath (1080-1160)

After extensive travel to Syria and beyond, Adelard translated the Greek copies of Euclid’s Elements, into Latin.  Euclid’s work (~300 BC) was the basis of advanced mathematics.  Adelard’s work is an exhaustive study of geometry based on Euclid’s textbook. 

Translators

From at least the 12^th century onwards Catholics were eager translators of ancient, pagan and even Muhammadan texts.  Gerard of Cremona (1114-87) translated Ptolemy’s Almagest, or compendium of astronomical and geocentric observations and calculations.  Gerard also translated Arab works by Avicenna on medicine and Averroes on Aristotle’s philosophies.  Gerard and other translators were able to produce copies of Aristotle’s enormous (if usually uncompleted) output.  This had a profound impact on medieval ‘scholasticism’ in natural philosophy, and theology.

Universities

Universities began to form as educational corporations, with their own charters and laws, funded by the Catholic Church in the 12^th century.  The first universities in Bologna (medicine), Paris (theology), Chartres (physics, natural philosophy), were exemplary illustrations of how innovative and forward thinking the medieval mind could be.  These environments provided an opportunity to educate, debate and investigate theology, nature, physics and pagan philosophies including Platonism and Aristotelianism.  This Catholic obsession with education and knowledge has no other parallel from any other worldview in history.

Sources:

James Hannam, God’s Philosophers, 2017.

The miracle of Western Europe - how did it survive?

Pagan assaults from Muslims, Avars, Magyars, Vikings, Saxons...yet Christendom fought, won, survived, thrived.

Monday, February 10, 2025 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

Context

The medieval era from roughly 500 AD to 1550 AD, was a millennia of great change and progress.  The attacks on this epoch which in effect built the modern world, are provided by various groups opposed to the Catholic Church:  Protestants, ‘Humanists’ or Atheists, 17^th century self-promoters, Enlighteners, and 19^th century philosophers posing as scientists (Darwin, Marx etc). 

Medieval history is rarely taught, and even rarer is to find someone who understands how medieval philosophers and natural scientists built the foundations for mathematics, physics, astronomy, cosmology chemistry, engineering and even the comprehension of electricity.  As if the telescope just popped into existence by itself, or the university built itself, or the enormous complexity of Magellan’s circumnavigation, was without a long pedigree of innovations.

Constraints

The constraints against any civilisation developing at all were significant.  It is a miracle that Western Europe survived in any form.  It is incredible that any civilisation of any value was created in what had to be the most difficult if not impossible of circumstances.  Consider the following.

Rome:

The end of the Roman military empire over a 200-year period, and its white-slavery premised economy, stopped the financing of public works across Europe and the mediterranean.  Without the military-economy and its wars, plunder and white slavery, the economic basis for much of this region was destroyed.  This economic fracture had to be replaced and improved.  This takes time. 

90% of the population of Rome, or roughly 90 million out of 100 million people were poor, mostly peasantry, and largely illiterate.  This is hardly a promising starting point when the empire inevitably collapses. 

Governance in Rome was controlled by the military and aristocratic elite.  When local government was replaced by Germanic leaders, there were few who could read, write, comprehend the laws, or attract public confidence.  In the main, it was the Church who provided the foundations for law-and-order post 500 A.D.  One of their great challenges was to improve the literacy of society and to instil peace and legal procedures over force and violence.  This transition period would necessarily take time – in fact generations.

In 500 A.D. the legacy of Rome was not what the books and movies describe.  It was an empire largely built on white slaving and war.  Literacy was low, the currency devalued, terms of trade short, the Roman numerals inured to advanced mathematics, Latin was fragmenting into vernaculars, no social or welfare system existed, there was no public education, and the economy ran on slavery which prevented innovation and technology being developed. 

Yet we are constantly told that somehow, such a civilisation, which exalted the barbarity of gladiatorial contests, slavery and violence, was the apogee of mankind’s civilisation, because the slaves and military could construct roads, some coliseums, or public baths.  What a bloody nonsense.  The point to be made is that by 500 A.D. Europe and the western Mediterranean were in a deep depression, bankrupted financially and morally, and even the rather limited public infrastructure was in the context of some 800 years of empire building, remarkable thin and scant.  The Romans created no innovations in art, literature or even basic social services. 

Byzantium:

Constantine quite rightly moved the focus and locus of the Roman empire, away from the corrupt barbarism of Rome to the East to Constantinople.  He established Christianity as the state religion in about 315 A.D.  The pagan barbarism of Rome with its culture of war and slaving was reduced.  Christianity flourished in the East and the Byzantine empire was one of history’s greatest and most splendid creations.  It is never taught because it was profoundly Christian and Greek.  It upsets the settled narrative that Christianity post Rome led to nothing but ‘darkness’. 

The Byzantines invented a wide variety of innovations in architecture, engineering, military technology, mathematics, astronomy and science, including the astrolabe, Greek fire, the translation of ancient Greek philosophers, and the creation of massive libraries and schools.  Algebra for example, is an Arab word for maths which already existed in the 2^nd century AD and can be found within Byzantine universities.  The use of Hindu numerals was known to the Byzantines before the Muslims conquered, slaughtered and enslaved some 50 million Hindus and Buddhists starting in the 9^th century.  The narrative can’t handle this, so any Christian-Byzantine flowering in any domain must be allotted to a non-Christian group.

The main point here is that there was an early split between the ‘West’ and Latin, and the ‘East’ and Greek.  This is rarely remarked upon.  The ancient sources including early Bibles, were found in Greek.  The language gap precluded an easy translation into Latin.  This issue was compounded by the internal challenges faced by the ‘Western Roman empire’ after 500 AD.  Much in the way of science and learning did not make its way into the West because of the language barrier.  This was remediated in part, when Byzantine Christians fled the Muslim Jihad in the mid-15^th century and brought back copies of Greek manuscripts and books.  This helped stimulate the so-called Renaissance or rebirth, which was just an extension of what already existed – medieval civilisation, premised on Byzantium’s 1000 year history of learning. 

Invasions:

The Muslim invasions destroyed Christianity.  Staring in 632 AD the eastern, southern and Spanish western mediterranean basin, was conquered by the moon cult of Mecca and Christianity was pulled asunder.  Trade routes, cultural exchanges, travel and information sharing in the once Christian empire was destroyed.  Spain was largely conquered, except for Don Pelayo and the Asturias, by 720 A.D.  France was invaded by huge Muslim armies (40 to 80.000 men) now called ‘raids’ by revisionist Christophobic historians and almost succumbed to the Muslim Jihad. 

War is bad for just about everything.  The Muslim desecration and destruction of Christianity was evidenced everywhere from the killing of its men and the rapes of its women, to the plunder and effacing of its cities, towns, libraries, aqueducts, irrigation systems, schools and ecclesiastical buildings which provided welfare and social support.  Building ‘civilisation’ when it is being destroyed is rather difficult.

As written above, by 500 A.D. the Western rump of the Roman empire was in dire straits to begin with.  The Musulman incursions against an unprepared population further retarded civilisation’s development.  There is no factual basis to any of the claims for Muslim ‘civilisation’.  The Muslim empires invented nothing of note.  Any so called discoveries already existed, or in the case of their meagre philosophical and astronomical outputs, were rendered by non-Muslims with Muslimified names. 

Having said that, based on Musulman sources, Visigothic Spain and indeed North Africa amazed the Muslims with its wealth, sophistication, glittering cities, libraries, learning and welfare.  From the low point of 500 A.D. the Romano-Christian culture of Spain and North Africa had gone to great lengths to repair and expand civilisation. 

This was eradicated by Muslims who took over these rich areas, which were later declared by Christophobic ‘intellectuals’ to have been built by Moslems.  Absurd to say the least.  In fact North Africa, once the granary of the Roman empire became a desert.  Its irrigation systems annihilated by Muslims, the world’s biggest library in Alexandria set to fire by the Muslims.  Wheeled carts once plentiful on the roads of North Africa largely disappeared for 300 years replaced by donkeys. 

The Muslim irruption was just one.  Huns or Avars had been plundering central and Western Europe  since the 5^th century (Attila the Hun for example).  Magyars (Huns) fell upon Europe in waves starting in the 9^th century.  The Saxons, pagans before their forcible conversion by Charlemagne in the 9^th century, emanated from Germany and plundered areas of Francia, Frisia and England.  The Anglo-Saxon-Jute takeover of England was followed by the Viking plundering of the island, France, Ireland and other North Sea targets starting in the late 8^th century and lasting until the reign of Canute in the early 11^th century.  We have here endless war  stretching from the Musulman invasion of 710 AD (Spain) to William the Conqueror (1066).  Almost every region in Western Europe was enveloped in war and subject to the dislocations caused by war, invasion, disease and social unrest.

Summary

A normal person, with a normal intellect, understands that ‘science’ or ‘mathematics’ in such a context would not be a priority.  Creating a telescope (optics begin in the 12^th century), is not really a priority when your land is ravaged, and your family threatened with death.  It is only after the defeat of the Muslims in Spain, which becomes evident in 1200 AD, the end of the Viking invasions (roughly 1000 AD), and the defeat of the Magyars in central Europe (early 11^th century); that Western Europe even has a chance at rebuilding the civilisation that was in repair and proceeding to greatly surpass that of Rome, in 700 A.D.  

One of the greatest miracles in history is simply this:  How did the Romano-German-Christian civilisations of Western Europe survive from 500 to 1000 AD? If there is a logical proof for God's existence, it is surely the fact that Western Europe somehow survived the pagan assaults of Muslims, Huns, Avars, Magyars, Saxons and Vikings from 500 AD to 1000 AD. 

Yes, Muhammad Abdullah existed. A follower of Satan. A man who created the Satanic Jihad.

Yes the Musulman cult is a Satanic enterprise.

Friday, January 31, 2025 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

The founder and war leader of the Meccan moon-cult, or ‘Islam’ meaning submission to Al Lah (The Lord of Mecca or moon deity) and his ‘only messenger’ Muhammad, was born, lived, died and was real.  The sex-slaving, brigand and corrupt was first mentioned by name in a Christian-Syriac fragment, written around 634.  

This Syriac document references a Muhammadan raid on peaceful villages and farms.  The year of the raid is uncertain.  But this was the modus operandi of a cult of cut throats and thieves: “many villages [in Homs] were ravaged by the killing [of the followers] of Muhammad and many people were slain and [taken] prisoner from Galilee to Beth,” and “some ten thousand” other Christians were slaughtered in “the vicinity of Damascus.”

Another Christian monk and historian, Thomas the Presbyter, confirms the depradations of the cult formed by Muhammad.  Writing circa 640, he states that “there was a battle [probably Ajnadayn] between the Romans and the Arabs of Muhammad in Palestine twelve miles east of Gaza. The Romans fled. . . . Some 4,000 poor villagers of Palestine were killed there. . . . The Arabs ravaged the whole region.” They even “climbed the mountain of Mardin and killed many monks there in the monasteries of Qedar and Bnata.”  By Romans, Thomas means the Byzantine Christians or ‘Eastern Romans’. 

The Christian Egyptian Copts also recorded the Muhammadan irruptions.  A Coptic homily, dating from around the 640s, associate the Musulmans with a heretical and false piety.  This homily advises Coptic Christians to fast, but not “like the Saracens who are oppressors, who give themselves up to prostitution, massacre and lead into captivity the sons of men, saying, ‘we both fast and pray.’”  The activities of Muhammad’s followers were the exact opposite of Christian piety. 

John of Nikiu, writing in 650 or thereabouts, said that the Musulman invaders and by then, conquerors of Egypt, were “enemies of God” and adherents of “the detestable doctrine of the beast, that is, Mohammed.”  The Musulmans were justly described as Satanic.  Any cursory reading of the Muslims handbook of hate, Mein Koran, makes this claim obvious and justifiable.

Saint John of Damascus (b. 676) performed a thorough analysis of Muhammad and his cult ‘Submission’.  Taking Mein Koran at face value he concluded that the only “miracle” Muhammad performed was to invade, slaughter, and enslave those who refused to submit to him — a “miracle that even common robbers and highway bandits can perform.”   

Saint John remarked that this Arab ‘prophet’ (profiteer is fitter) inserted into his own vapid mouth whatever words from his Al-Lah that served him best, “simulating revelation in order to justify his own sexual indulgence”.  Saint John remarked that by equating himself with his ‘god’, the moon idol (Al Lah) of Mecca, Muhammad made his religion appealing and justified his own behaviour by easing the sexual and moral codes of the Arabs and fusing the notion of obedience to God with war to aggrandize oneself with booty and slaves.

In the eighth century, Nicetas Byzantinos, who studied the Koran, presented it as the “most pitiful and most inept little book of the Arab Muhammad … full of blasphemies against the Most High, with all its ugly and vulgar filth,” particularly its claim that heaven amounted to a “sexual brothel.”  In his entry for the years 629–630, Theophanes the Confessor (b. 758) wrote:

“He [Muhammad] taught his subjects that he who kills an enemy or is killed by an enemy goes to Paradise [Koran 9:111]; and he said that this paradise was one of carnal eating and drinking and intercourse with women, and had a river of wine, honey and milk, and that the women were not like the ones down here, but different ones, and that the intercourse was long-lasting and the pleasure continuous; and other things full of profligacy and stupidity.”

Allah was denounced as an impostor deity, namely Satan: “I anathematize the God of Muhammad,” read one Eastern Roman canonical rite.

Regarding Christianity, Muhammad viewed it as his arch enemy.  He and his cult deny the Trinity, reduce Christ to a prophet of Islam (some 600 years before Muhammad formed his cult) and regarded all Christian practices and idols including the cross, as blasphemy and sacrilegious.  All of this certainly proves that Muhammad was Satanic.  Thus, “the false prophet,” “the hypocrite,” “the liar,” “the adulterer,” “the forerunner of Antichrist,” and “the Beast” became mainstream epithets for Muhammad among Christians for centuries.

These names need to be restored to his cult and all its members.

Sources

Muhammad and the 'genesis' of his cult of violence and Jihad

Nothing religious whatsoever about the origins of the Meccan moon deity cult.

Monday, January 27, 2025 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

“I have been commanded to wage war against the mankind until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah….If they do so, their blood and property are protected.”  Muhammad bin Abdullah, ‘Prophet of Islam’

The conflict between the cult of Muhammad and the rest of the world, and with its most detested enemy namely Christianity (Mein Koran is more Christophobic, than anti-Semitic), is based on the ‘principles’ of its founder.  As quoted above Muhammad the slave of Allah (Abdullah) was a warrior chieftain.  He was no prophet of peace, but a profiteer of war, brigandage, sex slavery, destruction and violence.  His mission, given to him apparently by the archangel Gabriel, was to spread the cult of Allah, or the worship of the moon deity of Mecca, around the globe with the sword and scimitar.

The message delivered to the mentally unstable Muhammad in his meditation cave in 610 A.D when he was 40 by the archangel Gabriel was simple – make sure all humans ‘submit’ to this Allah deity.  Muhammad a former caravan leader for his wealthy older wife spent 12 years trying to spread this message in his hometown of Mecca, winning fewer than 100 converts.  The Meccans allowed Muhammad to freely preach in the polytheistic, celestial worshipping city. 

When Muhammad became more brazen and preached against the existing idols worshipped by the Meccans, including the Sun and Venus, he became a threat to the pilgrimage trade.  This centred around the Kabah shrine which housed a black asteroid and 360 idols.  Many surrounding tribes journeyed to the shrine as a votive of cult duty which brought economic benefits to Mecca.  Muhammad’s ramblings about submission only to the Al-Lah or main deity of Mecca, and his demand that all other idols and cults be disbanded, was bad for business.

Muhammad and his small band were forced to flee to Medina.  With his gang of ruffians, he inserted himself into Medinan politics, became an arbiter in disputes between city factions and eventually a sort of prince of Medina.  With many men at his disposal, he began his career of violence, launching raids against other cities, villages and caravans.

Muhammad’s principle of ‘religiosity’ can be summed up in one of his earliest commands given to his men in Medina, “Fight them (non-Muslims) until they testify that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger; if they do so, then their blood (lives) and possessions are denied you.”  Notice the conflation between the Arab celestial idol or Al Lah, meaning the Lord who was the moon, and Muhammad.  Only Muhammad is the mediator between the moon deity and mankind.  Only Muhammad can wield absolute power because only Muhammad has access and insight to the desires of the moon deity.

To convert to Muhammad’s cult and partake of the spoils of raiding and small-scale warfare, all one had to do was confirm that there is only one god named Al Lah, and that Muhammad is his only messenger.  This is called the sha-ha-da and is the first pillar of the Muslim cult.  The name Islam simply means submission to Al Lah and most importantly, to his only messenger, Muhammad.

The primary impetus to join Muhammad’s gang in Medina was the spoils of war and raiding.  Arabs were famous even in the days of the Roman empire, for being raiders and thieves.  It was a part of the culture.  Now Muhammad was offering criminals, brigands, rapists, cut-throats, the violent and the mentally unstable, divine sanction, absolution, redemption and upon death in battle or after conversion to the cult, a paradise of virgins, wine, food and entertainment.  It was a winning stratagem.  As Edward Gibbon no friend of Christianity drily wrote, “(Muhammad) employ(ed) even the vices of mankind as the instruments of their salvation.”

On average Muhammad led 9 military expeditions each year between 622 and 630 A.D.  The success of pilfering, sex slaving and wanton destruction had attracted some 10.000 men into a resolute and violent army.  As Muslim historians of a later date admitted (such as Ibn Khaldun in the 14^th century), these Arab tribesmen following Muhammad were illiterate, savage, brutal and atavistic.  This was no religiously inspired crowd of devotionals and penitents.  These were cruel and barbaric men, plundering, raping, stealing, murdering and converting people at the point of the sword.  So it came to pass that in 630 A.D. Muhammad with 10.000 men attacked Mecca where he was previously rejected and forced the Meccans to submit to the Al Lah cult.

Sources:https://western-civilisation.com/article/5889/39/A_must_read_book_Raymond_Ibrahims_Sword_and_Scimitar/Books_Reviewed

Baldwin the Leper King and the miracle at Mont Gisard

Overwhelming odds, a miracle, Saladin destroyed.

Monday, January 20, 2025 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

The Battle and the Miracle of Mont Gisard.

On November 11, 1177, Frankish King Baldwin IV, known as the "Leper King," faced the Musulman Jihadist Saladin, who marched with 26,000 Muslim soldiers to crush the Christian kingdom of Jerusalem. Baldwin, though severely ill and outnumbered, led a much smaller Christian force of 500 Christian knights and infantry.

At the Battle of Montgisard, Baldwin’s army carried the True Cross, a symbol of Christ’s victory. The Crusaders launched a daring ambush, routing Saladin’s forces and securing a miraculous triumph. Saladin barely escaped with his life, retreating to Egypt.

This incredible victory shows Baldwin's faith, courage, and reliance on God. 

 "If God be for us, who can be against us?" (Romans 8:31, KJV)

Clash of Civilisations - the never ending Musulman Jihad

The intent is to eradicate Christianity

Saturday, January 18, 2025 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

The Clash of Civilisations, namely that between the Muhammadan and the Christian was the defining feature of international affairs from 632 AD to 1900 AD.  For almost 1300 years, the Musulman Jihad attacked what it perceived as its arch enemy – Christendom.  In turn, Western states, riven by various political and regional tensions and self-interests viewed Christianity as the main if not the only unifying philosophical framework to defend itself against the Jihad.  No Christianity, no modern Europe.

Oddly with resounding bathos, Musulmans were always better protected in Christian states, than Christians within the Musulman.  This is reflected today in the immoral, illogical and disastrous policies of the ‘multicult’ and the ‘relativism’ of ‘modern culture’, where all ‘faiths’ are equal, except that the Islamic is superior, especially to the Christian.  This gives rise to the rape-state, where Musulmans can rape with impunity, 1 million white English girls and the police, the state, useless parasites called ‘politicians’, the endless agencies concerned with ‘child welfare’ not only do nothing, but actively aid the sex Jihad. 

Not so if you are a Christian within a Musulman state.  You will be taxed, raped, accorded second class status, prevented from publicly practicing your faith, denied the ability to engage in certain professions, obstructed from marrying a Musulman female, and in extremis, attacked and killed.  No multi-culti professions of love and tolerance.  Christianity is the most persecuted religion on the planet.  In Nigeria alone, every single year, Black Musulmans murder some 5.000 Black Christians.  No one cares.  But imagine if the opposite were true.

Bernard Lewis, “We tend nowadays to forget that for approximately a thousand years, from the advent of Islam in the seventh century until the second siege of Vienna in 1683, Christian Europe was under constant threat from Islam, the double threat of conquest and conversion.  Most of the new Muslim domains were wrested from Christendom.  Syria, Palestine, Egypt, and North Africa were all Christian countries, no less, indeed rather more, than Spain and Sicily.  All this left a deep sense of loss and a deep fear.”

Despite the Musulman invasions, destructions, slaughter, rapine, plunder and wanton evisceration of Western-Christian culture, we have today, the mentally ill ‘liberals’ who view world history, as one endless story of Western ‘aggression’.  The Musulmans slave traded for sex, labour and military conscription no less than 25 million White Christians ranging from Russia to Iceland.  A further 50 million Hindus and Buddhists were killed in the Jihad in the subcontinent, and millions more enslaved.  Some 40 million Black Africans were captured as slave chattel, shipped north to Arab-Muslim states, many dying en-route, the rest worked to death, or sexed to produce Musulman Jihadis. 

The rapist-paedophile profiteer Muhammad deflowered a 9-year-old girl; possessed ‘with his right hand’, some 24 sex slaves, his favourite being Mary the white Copic Christian.  Yet we are told by idiots in quackademia, the media and research institutions, that this brigand-totalitarian, was a seer and religious prophet.  Muhammad led 80 odd military excursions, initiating wholesale slaughters of Jewish and Christian tribes resident in Arabia – who were far more advanced and educated than the pagan Arabs. 

No miracles, no universal principles, no New Testament expostulations on tolerance and forgiveness by the mad Muhammad.  His career and his book ‘Recital’ are interested in war, power, spoils and the domination and sex slavery of women.  War to exterminate all non-Musulmans or convert them to the moon deity of Mecca cult.  Complete supremacy over women to please men and produce ghazis and Jihadis for the cult.

Any cursory reading of Musulman history and its endless Jihad reveals the truth, namely that modern ‘fundamentalist Muslims’ are simply following the example of Mein Koran and der Fuehrer Muhammad.  Anyone who can still read, and who has investigated the 1300 years of Musulman Jihad against Christianity, will be pleasantly surprised (if their IQs are sufficiently elevated enough), to read that the combatants in this struggle were frank and clear about the philosophical and religious reasons which were the foundations of the various conflicts.  No ‘relativity’ or ‘subjectivist’ philosophical diseases distorted the reality.  The Musulmans wanted to eradicate Christianity, and subject Christians to Koran-Totalitarian rule and force them to convert to the moon cult of Mecca or die.  It was as simple as that.

Muhammad’s moon cult and Christianity are mortal enemies.  Only one survives.  The totalitarian view of Muhammad’s cult is similar to that of Communism and Fascism.  Islam uber alles.  This means that the Islamic theocracy controls every aspect of your life.  Surely a wet dream for the many liberal half wits who populate Western states.  Maybe such a theocracy can be merged with the next ‘plandemic’, where a Medical Nazism can lead the way to a Musulman Nazism.

The Muslim Jihad and the roots of the Muhammadan cult.

The 'West' is simply the rump of a far larger and destroyed Christian empire.

Sunday, January 5, 2025 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

“I have been commanded to wage war against mankind until they testify there is no god by Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah….If they do so, their blood and property are protected.”

“I have been made victorious with terror.”

The Muslim Jihad against civilisation and the world at large begins with Muhammad the founder of the Meccan cult.  In 610 Anno Domini this deranged and bloody personality began informing his illiterate Bedouin tribesmen that the arch-angel Gabriel had selected him to be this Allah’s messenger.  Historically the Al-lah or Lord of Mecca was Baal the moon deity and Muhammad’s family were its caretakers.  Over time this Al Lah becomes conflated with an immanent ‘God’ and seeks to replace the Christian ideal of the Holy Trinity.  Muhammad’s message was simple, the cult was called ‘Submission’ or Islam.  Submit to his Al Lah whatever it might be, and most importantly to its only messenger Muhammad himself.

Forced out of Mecca, fleeing to Medina, Muhammad becomes the dictator of the city-state, forms an army and begins raiding everywhere.  His followers increased as brigandage, and larceny brought back plunder and women.  To join the cult, all one had to do was recite the Shahada, the first pillar of Islam, literally a sentence fragment, ‘There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger’, which confirms loyalty to the Allah thing and Muhammad.  You didn’t need to believe, do much in the way of rituals or oblations, except pray a few times and often in the early years of Muhammad’s cult that was not required. 

As Edward Gibbon catalogued, from 622 to 632 AD, Muhammad led or supported an average of 9 raiding expeditions every year.  By 632 AD the entire peninsula of Arabia was in the control of his cult.  By comparison he had a few dozen mostly familial followers after 12 years of ‘preaching’ in Mecca.  War apparently, pays big dividends.  Gibbon, ‘(Muhammad) employed even the vices of mankind as the instruments of their salvation, and the use of fraud and perfidy, of cruelty and injustice, were often subservient to the propagation of the faith.’

By 630 AD Muhammad could assemble 10.000 men and march on Mecca.  Abu Sufyan, the leader of the Meccans, and once an inveterate opponent of Muhammad, submitted to the Al Lah cult and said the Shahada.  He would later become a fanatical Jihadist and murderer of Christians and pagans.  The allure of booty, loot, women and power was built into the Jihad from its very beginnings.

The real appeal of Muhammad’s simple message was the compatibility with the uncivilised pagan-tribal nature of Arabian society.  In 7^th century Arabia one’s loyalty lay with the tribe, mandating a deep-seated enmity of other tribes and groups.  Raids between tribes were endless and most tribes such as Muhammad’s were organised within familial lines.  Muhammad’s tribe the Quraysh, who ran Mecca, were composed from the same extended familial lines.  This pagan-tribal appeal of Submission, in which raiding, brigandage, rape and sexual enslavement were divinely sanctioned explains much of its appeal. The Muslim philosopher Ibn Khaldun (d.1406) described Arab Muslims as the ‘most savage human beings that exist. Compared with sedentary people they are on a level with wild, untamable animals and dumb beasts of prey.  Such people are the Arabs’.  Hardly a strong endorsement of civilised, religious bearing.

Other uncivilised and pagan tribes were also attracted to Muhammad’s cult.  The illiterate, savage Berbers in North Africa became fanatical Muslims invading Spain in the 8^th century and again in the 11^th and laying waste to much of civilisation in Spain and southern France.  The Turks and Mongols likewise embraced the tribal dictates of Muhammad’s primitive cult, with both being uncivilised nomadic, animistic tribes, without any pretence of higher culture.  The tribal elements and fiduciary benefits of joining the Jihad were too much to resist.  Needless to say, both Turks and Mongols laid waste great swathes of Christian civilisation and territory. 

The concept of tribe became the Umma or brotherhood of all Muslims.  Muhammad declared in 630 AD after conquering Mecca that ‘a believer shall not slay a believer for the sake of an unbeliever, not shall he aid an unbeliever against a believer’ (example is Koran 4-89, 4-144).  The world of the Umma was a stark dichotomy -the supra-tribe of Muhammad against everyone else.  Muslims were to become friends with each other to the exclusion of the unbeliever (Ibn Ishaq, 1997, p. 232).  The creation of a supra-tribe, supremacist, ‘pure’ and ‘divinely’ sanctioned and supported, gave great energy and confidence to the Muslim Jihad, regenerating itself in violence and blood, as the primitive and savage tribes of the Berbers, Turks and Mongols joined the cult of Muhammad. 

Numerous Koranic verses portray the Jihad as the noblest duty of a Muslim.  Muhammad stated that ‘Lining up for battle in the path of Allah is worthier than 60 years of worship’.  There is a reason why the cult of Islam or Submission does not have monks, monasteries, nuns or convents.  The expectation was war, Jihad, and fighting, not praying, prostration and meditation.  Muhammad’s Jihad offered not only the Spoils of War (Sura 8 in the Koran), but also an after life of riches and spoils, replete with virgins, young boys, wine and unlimited comforts.  It was a win-win for the Jihadi.  Die in battle and go to the Muslim-male heaven (nothing similar exists for the Muslim female) to be tantalised by buxom virgins, young boys, food and wine.  Or survive and win the battle and satiate your temporal lusts with sex slaves, money, land and loot. 

What if a Muslim refused to fight?  The Al Lah had a darker and more sinister view of such a person.  In Sura 8-15, the Al Lah says that those who don’t fight for the cult will be ‘be tortured like no other sinful human’.  If you could not physically fight, you were expected to ‘strive’ or give a greater Jihad, to support the ‘lesser’ or physical-warring Jihad.  Money, your property, food, weapons, camels or horses, were expected from those who could not physically saddle up and ride in the Jihad.  To further tempt males into joining the cults’ endless, and yearly raiding and warring, the Al Lah promised to commute and expunge all sins and wrong-doings.  This was true if you fought and survived, or even more so, if you went on Jihad and perished.  For the martyred Jihadi he is, according to Muhammad, precious to the Al Lah, ‘He is forgiven from the first drop of blood (he sheds).  He sees his throne in paradise….Fixed atop his head will be a crown of honour, a ruby that is greater than the world and all it contains.  And he will copulate with 72 Houris.’  The Houris are supernatural, celestial big breasted nymphs, with ‘wide eyes’, created by the Al Lah as presents and rewards for his deceased Jihadis.  That ‘heaven’ for the cult of Muhammad is depicted as a brothel with unlimited food and wine service, and this is unsurprising given the uncivilised and atavistic culture it represents.

Importantly, the Jihadis intentions or Muslimification was unimportant.  The only point at issue, was to engage in and support the Jihad.  If you didn’t really believe in the Al Lah moon deity or ‘god’, or in Muhammad and kept it to yourself that was fine.  Sura 2 depicts Jihad as a business, as a ‘fine loan to Al Lah’ and ‘rejoice in the bargain you have struck for that is the supreme triumph’ (Koran 9-111).  For the average tribal male this ‘bargain’ was simply a win-win.  If he and the Jihad succeed, he has every chance at becoming wealthy and satisfying carnal lusts with sex slaves.  If he dies, he goes to the Muslim brothel in heaven, well-provisioned with targets of lust, food and wine.  His piety was unimportant, participating in war was what the Al Lah demanded and rewarded.

Jihad is baked into the Koran and Muhammad’s cult from its inception.  Submission or Islam was formed by war and raiding.  Its irruption in 632 AD into the Greek-Roman-Christian empire in the ‘East’, created the ‘West’ by destroying 2/3 of Christendom.  Christianity in the guise of the Byzantine empire, controlled the Middle East and North Africa, with the Christian Visigoths established in Spain.  Within 1 century the Muslims had completely effaced this Christian unity, subjugating most of the Middle East, North African and Spain.  The ‘West’ so-called is simply the rump of what had been an extensive Christian empire from Britain to Armenia.  Christian groups, churches, buildings, monasteries, libraries, agriculture, industry, hospitals, ports and trade routes were destroyed, taken over, converted or re-directed by Muslims for their own benefit, in their endless Jihad.  How many people today know that the term ‘West’ comes from the Middle Ages and means the remaining 1/3 rump of what was once an advanced and vibrant Mediterranean based Christian empire?

Without Christianity there is no modern world

A simple fact that cannot be contradicted.

Wednesday, December 25, 2024 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

The modern world was formed from European Christianity. There were no 'dark ages', only our present dark and feeble minds cannot peer into the dim past and discern the energy, innovation, trials and errors of the 'Middle Ages', from 500 AD to 1500 AD. As if our own 'modern era' is one bereft of cult superstition or stupidity. Cults of secular materialism named 'science', better called quackery, including evolution, which forwards the remarkably ignorant claim that magic produced 2 million genes per chromosomal pair, or globaloneywarming in which a trace chemical 95% emitted by Gaia, causes 'weather', makes a lie out of that assertion. In the age of rampant, accessible technology, our own fettered minds are rather dark indeed.

There is no modern world without Christianity. Period.

Unlike the fascistic death and sex cult of Islam, Christianity formed every single basis of modernity including science, social mores, human rights, a legal code, art, architecture, and even social civility. Democracy itself, now prone to mob rule and control by a corrupt plutocratic elite comes out of Christianity and its untold number of activists, who tore down the world of the Lord and Baron and granted the average person respect and some share of the power and spoils. Christianity is the only faith in history which provides a moral and rational argument for the protection of basic human rights, granted to each unique individual human by a power beyond our ken.

In the ancient world the idea of the individual did not exist. In all states and empires, it was the communal which was important, not the individual. The Roman symbol of the Fasces, the root of word Fascist, was a bundle of sticks [the individual], wrapped around an axe [the state]. All modern conceptions of individual rights and freedoms are only found in Christianity. It was the Christian worldview of the sanctity of life, free-will and freedom which fought against tyranny, lawlessness and centralized power and arbitrary force. The ancient world had no idea about free-will, individual or natural law rights and a legal code applicable across society regardless of rank.

Individual rights and the creation of a justice system, based on natural law rights [God-granted rights]; equally applied to all members of society regardless of rank and power; emanated from Christianity and only Christianity. In the early 13^th century, a Catholic and royal judge Henry de Bracton (d. 1268) wrote a massive tome on the principles of law and justice which formed the basis of Common Law and all of it was premised on Christian rationality and argumentation germinating from natural law rights. Bracton wrote that jurisprudence or an applied legal code was ‘the science of the just and unjust’. In this worldview even kings, despots, and usurpers of power reside under God and the law, ‘because the law makes the king. For there is no king where will rules rather than the law.’

Broader notions about human rights and science of course came only from Christianity, not the materialistic Enlightenment. One only has to read Christ's teachings to understand that the poor, the dispossessed, the forsaken, the sick, the wounded, and the diseased are only protected by Christian theology. Evolution views the weak as fodder which should be killed. Secular Marxism has nothing to say about morality, laws, charity, or rights. Slavery was abolished only by Christians, not materialists or Moslems. The ‘Enlightenment’ a supposed age of 'reason' produced witch-burnings, the French Revolution with its ‘reign of terror’ and the 20th century bloodbath of Atheist-Marxism. The dialectical fascisms of Islam, Evolution and Marxism are in essence cults of death.

Science as well, is of course premised on Christian rationalism and faith. True scientists are not the quacks of today who scream that trace chemicals cause weather [then torture the data and lie to support their positions]; or that 48 feet of library bookshelf code named DNA was formed by 'chance' and that the mouse became Mozart. Real scientists follow methods and procedures set forth by the innovators of the Middle Ages. All of the founders of modern science, including but certainly not limited to Newton, Faraday, Pascal, even Galileo et al., used faith to aid their science. Since Christianity developed science, there has never been, and is not today a 'conflict' between the two. [See here a link for the world's top scientists, past and present, who were Christian.]

There is precious little which is positive in the cult fascisms of Islam, Evolution, Secularism, or Marxism. Yet the 'elite', the media, the 'scientists', the 'secular thinkers', all pronounce these cults as 'superior', with the formation of the iPad world a direct derivative of their 'incredible achievements'. In today's world lies are science, fraud is fact, and up is down. At some point the pendulum will swing back again from the current age of darkness to something hopefully more intelligent and apposite.

Sura 9 and Jihadic Hate speech

Koranic Hate Crimes

Monday, December 16, 2024 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

Sura 9 is an important Sura in that it is the last or second last 'revelation' of phrases given by the moon deity Hub'Allah to Muhammad through the arch-angel Gabriel or when Muhammad was angry, sad, distraught, worried, or needed something immediately - directly. Sura 9 along with Sura 5 are the last two chapters which according to Moslem theologians, abrogate the rest. They happen to be the most violent, racist, supremacist and intolerant of the Koran Suras, which is a difficult job in and of itself considering that the Koran is one long exercise in a totalitarian scream.

If anyone wants to know what the cult of Submission's objectives, culture and creed are then read these two Suras. They are basically the only ones you will need to read. Their essence has found its way into Sharia Law and the Hadiths which further explain the Koran, do a masterful job at expostulating the key doctrines of Jihad, domination, racism, supremacy over all other ideologies and peoples, and the universality of Allah's will to power to dominate the world via Muhammad and the Arabs.

Key passages in Sura 9 include the following. There is no mis-translation or 'taken out of context'. Only Phd students in the liberal arts, or the media and craven politicians are so inclined to ignore words and their meanings. 21 lurid phrases are below:

Break Treaties with the Kufar.

Qur’an 9:3 “And an announcement from Allah and His Messenger to the people on the day of the Pilgrimage is that Allah and His Messenger dissolve treaty obligations with the Pagans.”

 Qur’an 9:7 “How can there be a covenant between Allah and His Messenger and the disbelievers with whom you made a treaty near the sacred Mosque?”

Qur’an 9:8 “How (can there be such a treaty), seeing that they get an advantage, the upper hand over you? They do not pay you respect, or honor you or the ties of kinship or covenant. With (good words from) their mouths they entice you (to negotiate), but their hearts are averse to you.”

Infidels are dirty.

Qur’an 9.28 O you who believe! the idolaters are nothing but unclean, so they shall not approach the Sacred Mosque (Mecca) after this year; and if you fear poverty then Allah will enrich you out of His grace if He please; surely Allah is Knowing Wise.

Kill the Infidel.

Qur’an 9:5 “When the sacred forbidden months for fighting are past, fight and kill the disbelievers wherever you find them, take them captive, torture them, and lie in wait and ambush them using every stratagem of war.”

Qur’an 9.29 Fight those who do not believe in Allah, nor in the latter day, nor do they prohibit what Allah and His Apostle have prohibited, nor follow the religion of truth, out of those who have been given the Book, until they pay the tax in acknowledgment of superiority and they are in a state of subjection.

Qur’an 9.30 And the Jews say: Uzair (Ezra) is the son of Allah; and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah; these are the words of their mouths; they imitate the saying of those who disbelieved before; may Allah destroy them; how they are turned away!

Qur'an 9:111 Verily, Allah has purchased of the believers their lives and their properties; for the price that theirs shall be the Paradise. They fight in Allah's Cause, so they kill (others) and are killed. It is a promise in truth which is binding on Him in the Taurat (Torah) and the Injeel (Gospel) and the Qur'an. And who is truer to his covenant than Allah? Then rejoice in the bargain which you have concluded. That is the supreme success.

Infidels are cursed.

Qur’an 9:31 They have taken their doctors of law and their monks for lords besides Allah, and (also) the Messiah son of Marium and they were enjoined that they should serve one God only, there is no god but He; far from His glory be what they set up (with Him).

Qur’an 9:32 They desire to put out the light of Allah with their mouths, and Allah will not consent save to perfect His light, though the unbelievers are averse.

Qur’an 9:97 “The Arabs of the desert are the worst in unbelief and hypocrisy, and most fitted to be in ignorance of the command which Allah hath sent down to His Messenger. Some of the Bedouins look upon their payments (for Allah’s Cause) as a fine and wish disasters to fall on you (so that they might not have to pay). Yet on them be the disaster of evil.”

Kill Apostates.

Qur’an 9:12 “If they violate their oaths and break treaties, taunting you for your Religion, then fight these specimens of faithlessness.”

[Qur’an 9:11-12 and the canonized Hadith: “Any person, i.e. Muslim, who has changed his religion, kill him” (Al-Bukhari, Vol. 9, p. 45).]

Moslems must fight in the Jihad.

Qur’an 9:38 “Believers, what is the matter with you, that when you are asked to march forth in the Cause of Allah (i.e., Jihad) you cling to the earth? Do you prefer the life of this world to the Hereafter? Unless you march, He will afflict and punish you with a painful torture, and put others in your place. But you cannot harm Him in the least.”

Qur’an 9:45 “Only those ask for exemption (from Jihad) who believe not in Allah and whose hearts are in doubt, so that they are tossed to and fro. If they had intended to march out to fight, they would certainly have made some preparation and readied their equipment; but Allah was averse to their being sent forth; so He made them lag behind. ‘Sit you among those who sit.’ If they had marched with you, they would not have added to your (strength) but only (made for) discord, spying and sowing sedition. There would have been some in your midst who would have listened to them. But Allah knows well those (peace-loving Muslims) who do wrong and are wicked.”

Qur’an 9:48 “They had plotted sedition before, and upset matters for you until the Decree of Allah (to fight) became manifest, much to their disgust. Among them are many who say: ‘Grant me exemption to stay back at home (exempted from Jihad). And do not tempt me (with promises of booty).’ Have they not fallen into temptation already? Indeed, Hell surrounds them.”

Qur’an 9:75 “Some of you made a deal with Allah, saying, ‘If You give us booty we shall pay You the tax.’ But when He gave them booty, they became greedy and refused to pay. As a consequence of breaking their promises, Allah filled their hearts with hypocrisy which will last forever.”

Qur’an 9:77 “He punished them by putting hypocrisy in their hearts until the Day whereon they shall meet Him, because they lied to Allah and failed to perform as promised. Allah knows their secrets. Those who slander and taunt the believers who pay the zakat (for Allah’s Cause) voluntarily and throw ridicule on them, scoffing, Allah will throw back their taunts, and they shall have a painful doom. Whether you ask for their forgiveness or not, (their sin is unforgivable). If you ask seventy times for their forgiveness Allah will not forgive them.”

Qur’an 9:81 “Those who stayed behind rejoiced in their inaction behind the back of the Messenger. They hated to strive and fight with their goods and lives in the Cause of Allah. They said, ‘Go not forth in the heat.’ Say, ‘The fire of Hell is fiercer in heat.’ If only they could understand! So let them laugh a little, for they will weep much as a reward for what they did. If Allah brings you back (from the campaign) to a party of the hypocrites and they ask to go out to fight, say: ‘You shall never go out to fight with me against a foe. You were content sitting inactive on the first occasion. So sit with the useless men who lag behind.’ Do not pray for any of them (Muhammad) that die, nor stand at his grave. They rejected Allah and disbelieved His Messenger. They died in a state of perverse rebellion.”

Qur’an 9:85 “And let not their wealth or (following in) sons dazzle you or excite your admiration. Allah’s plan is to punish them with these things in this world, and to make sure their souls perish while they are unbelievers. When a surah comes down enjoining them to believe in Allah and to strive hard and fight along with His Messenger, those with wealth and influence among them ask you for exemption from Jihad. They prefer to be with (their women), who remain behind (at home). Their hearts are sealed and so they understand not.”

Qur’an 9:93 “The (complaint) is against those who claim exemption (from fighting) while they are rich. They prefer to stay with the (women) who remain behind (at home). Allah has sealed their hearts. They are content to be useless. Say: ‘Present no excuses: we shall not believe you.’ It is your actions that Allah and His Messenger will observe. They will swear to you by Allah, when you return hoping that you might leave them alone. So turn away from them, for they are unclean, an abomination, and Hell is their dwelling-place, a fitting recompense for them.”

Islam Uber Alles.

Qur’an 9.33 He it is Who sent His Apostle with guidance and the religion of truth, that He might cause it to prevail over all religions.

Not much love and tolerance in the above. About 1/3 or more of this Sura is a long rant from Muhammad against those Arabs who did not fight in the 'cause of Allah'. These inactive Moslem cult members are cursed in this Sura. It is clear that Muhammad or Allah [both are the same], expected that Moslems must fight to further the interests of the cult. Jihad means war, it does not, and never has meant 'internal striving'. Jihad is a 6^th pillar of Islam, a commandment by Muhammad Allah to destroy the enemies of the cult with the sword. Sura 9 leaves little doubt about this truism.

More importantly given the aforementioned verses and their import in Islamic theology why is Islam a religion and not a Manichean, dichotomous and rather absurd pagan-bronze-age cult? Are supremacism’s now religions?

Syria and the Christocide

Assad falls to whom? ISIS?

Sunday, December 8, 2024 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

Syria was Christian under the Byzantines.  Well into the Musulman occupation almost half of its population was Christian.  Over time that was reduced to about 10% by 2010.  Now less than 5% of the population is Christian.  ISIS, Jihad Groups and Muslim 'militants' have targeted Christianity for eradication.  Assad and his family-tribal empire has fallen.  Now what?  More death and persecution of Christians will be one reality.  

Targeting Christians

Jihadist groups that are dominant in the Syrian opposition have been specifically targeting Christians nationwide — beginning with the abduction of Bishop Yohanna Ibrahim, head of the Syrian Orthodox Church in Aleppo, and Bishop Boulos Yaziji, head of the Greek Orthodox Church in Syria, who were kidnapped during a humanitarian trip in April 2013.

“No one knows who abducted them, but suspicion fell on the Jabhat al-Nusra Front — who are now HTS — the group [that] just seized large parts of Aleppo,” Parsons, a former aid worker to Afghanistan and an expert on Islamic theology, noted.

“Both Islamic State and other jihadist groups massacred and abducted large numbers of Christians. Churches were systematically destroyed in an attempt to religiously cleanse whole areas of Syria of its non-Muslim population,” he told The Stream.

“Islamic State also reimplemented aspects of shari’a allowing the enslavement of non-Muslims — and produced a slave prince list with different values for different age Yazidi and Christian women.”

Tenth Anniversary of ISIS Genocide

In August, the U.S. State Department released a statement marking the “10th Anniversary of ISIS’s Genocide Against Yezidis, Christians, and Shia Muslims.”

While the U.S. government estimates that 10% of the Syrian population is Christian, of the 2.2 million Christians who lived in the country prior to the civil war, Open Doors USA estimates that only approximately 579,000 remain (2.8 % of the population).

Most Christians belong to Orthodox churches, like the Syriac Orthodox Church, Eastern Catholic churches such as the Maronite Church, or the Assyrian Church of the East and other Nestorian churches.

There is an ongoing Christocide in Aleppo, one of Christianity's oldest communities. 

“Many of the Christians in Aleppo are descendants of the victims of the Armenian and Assyrian genocides (1915-23) when up to three million Christians are estimated to have been killed,” the Lindisfarne Centre explained.

“During that time the Ottoman government forced Christians living in what is now Turkey on a ‘death march’ into the Syrian desert during which vast numbers died of starvation, murder, or rape at the hands of Kurdish militias,” it added.

The Koran: So what percentage is 'good' to non-Muslims ?

Islam is not a religion – its unholy book makes that clear.

Monday, December 2, 2024 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

The elite and media-academic communities always claim – without offering proof - that Islam is peace and that all Muslims are of course sophisticated moderates. Few of these people making such claims knows much of anything of Islamic imperialism, expansion, its 1400 year jihad, nor have many of them read the 3 foundational works of the Meccan moon cult – the Sira or biography of the illiterate adventurer Mohammed, the Hadiths the supposed sayings of Mohammed scribbled down years after his death, or the Koran a supposed holy book.

Take a look at the Koran for example. Read it. Analyse it. Study it. What will you find ? What per-cent of this so-called 'holy book' is actually preaching a code of ethics, the derivatives of the Golden Rule, and the embracing of tolerance, compassion, gratitude, morality and love ? Almost none of it. In fact as I will illustrate below it is less than 2 % of all the words written.

In my own experience in reading the Koran over a number of years a few times, I can testify that the actual contact made with anything that might resemble the Book of Matthew is so scarce, that it stands out in stark juxtaposition and shocks the reader. In my mind the Book of Matthew is the seminal document in the New Testament, the one book that everyone should read. Its ethical program based on the teachings of a itinerant Jew carpenter and preacher from Galilee is the mainspring of civilized social interaction. It also the cultural basis for much of the attitudes which have helped create the modern world.

It is also a distinctly Jewish ideal, built up over a 2000 year period of Hebrew history, philosophy, debates and Old Testament learning. The Book of Matthew has many similarities to Zen Buddhism and Hindu cultural attitudes and there is little doubt that at its core Christianity is a religion in the sense and purpose of what a religion should offer. The natural outcome of Christian preaching and idolization of faith is the following: equality; emancipation of the female; charity; welfare systems; hospitals and of course pacifism. Gibbon was wrong when he blamed the Fall of Rome on the pacific and un-military nature of Christianity – but the description of the Christians being against war is valid. It was always thus, until the Muslim attacks from 650 AD to 1000 AD by necessity turned the Christian state into a more militant entity. Survival changes everything.

So in reading the Koran one must look for the Book of Matthew and the ethical program of the Sermon on the Mount. None of it of course exists. Mohammed was an illiterate – unlike Christ. He was a politician and warrior. He led 80 odd expeditions, murdered people, took and sold slaves, had sex with whomever he wanted, kept a score of sex slaves or concubines, enriched himself with booty, and was a dictator, who hated Jews and Christians. These are facts. He was most likely, like Hitler, rather insane. Why would one expect to find a gospel of religious compassion from such a founder ?

In the only scientific analysis of the Koran that I am aware of, scientist and theologian Bill Warner attempted to determine how much of the Koran was good to humanity as a whole. Most of the Koran is good to Muslims – especially male and Arab Muslims of course. But what about non-Muslims, what about people, what about the average person who is just a human living on earth ? As Warner relates:

“There are 4,108 words in the verses that seem to offer goodness to all of humanity (there are 153,207 words in the Koran, this varies upon which translation). Of course, this goodness is denied later in the chapter, but even at that, we have only 2.6% of the Koran that speaks well of humanity initially......

Even the 2.6% vanishes under the threatened violence if kaffirs don't accept Islam's offer of goodness. Violence and suffering are promised to 100% of those who do not believe in Mohammed...” (www.politicalislam.com/blog/the-good-in-the-koran/)

Warner's key point cannot be overstated. Even if the Koran says something nice about the non-Muslim it is usually conditional. Almost always a follow up sentence will contain, '..for Allah will bring them to account...' What the Koran is saying is two things. First, if you the Muslim are in an inferior position of power [for instance a minority in a Jew-Christian area], you can be nice to Jews and Christians since Allah will torture them in hell anyways, even though the infidels don't know it. But even these verses are quite few and far between. Second, and more often, you will read a verse in which the Muslim is instructed to be nice to the kaffir, only in the context of lying or deceiving the infidel to further the aims of Islam. This is called 'taqqiya' and deception to improve the position of Islam versus its enemies – which are all non-Muslims – is a fundamental doctrine of both Islam and Arab culture.

So Warner's appraisal that less than 3% of the Koran is kind to non-Muslims is optimistic. If one was to exclude Taqqiya, and the belief that when in a position of weakness you should show some considerations to the infidels since Allah will punish them anyways, it is valid to state that almost none of the Koran is kind to non-Muslims. This is in direct contrast to the Book of Matthew. No where in this book or in the New Testament can anyone find the same language, call to jihad, racism, supremacism or outright intolerance, one finds strewn on every page in the Koran.

This of course begs another question, never answered by the elite, the academics or the media drones. If the foundational text of Islam is irreligious and the opposite of what Christ taught, why then is Islam considered to be a religion ? Because people scream and yell that it is ? What rational intelligence accepts such a claim when the evidence of words, deeds and history spells out the opposite ? Isn't Islam just an Arabian political project, one designed to conquer the secular world in the name of the family moon cult deity of Mohammed, disguised as a 'faith'?

It is pretty clear from the Koran that Islam is not a theology of religion but an ideology of political power and control. That at least is what any sentient person reading the Koran and studying it would decide. Which is why one might suppose that the elitists in the educational systems, politics and media tell you the opposite. For these deniers of reality, Islam is part of the victimized non-Western world, and part of the travesty of Western imperialist history and slaughter. Therefore Islam is good because it is not Western. The ignorance of such a view is extreme in its absurdity, but sadly it is passed off as a cutlural fact embedded in the worship of the multi-cultural and relativist state.

Christian scientists and thinkers in the Middle Ages

Make me a similar list of Moslems.....

Sunday, November 17, 2024 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

Sura 3 and the demand for unending Jihad against non-Muslims

Mein Koran is Mein Koran. There is no 'Islamism'.

Monday, November 11, 2024 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

3-102: O you who believe! Fear Allah as He should be feared, and do not die except in a state of Islam.

3-100: You are the best of Peoples, evolved for mankind...If only the People of the Book had faith...but most of them are perverted transgressors.

Sura 3 is a ‘moderate’ Islamic chapter full of piety and hope, or so the Infidel will be told. 53 verses or 27% of the text is openly hostile and violent to Unbelievers. Like many long Koranic chapters, it is actually a 4 part themed rant:

1) Obey Muhammad who is always conflated with the Allah thing or Hub'Allah,

2) Destroy, humiliate and fight Unbelievers,

3) Those Moslem males who obey the moon deity will be rewarded with power in this life [over Unbelievers]; and an afterlife in paradise [the Koran never mentions what happens to the female, depicted by Muhammad as stupid and consigned by him and Allah to Hell], and

4) Moslems who apostatize or even doubt the Koran, Muhammad or the will of Allah will perish in hellfire, punished by the all-knowing, all-seeing Meccan moon deity.

3-7: It is He Who has sent down to you (Muhammad SAW) the Book (this Qur'an). In it are Verses that are entirely clear, they are the foundations of the Book [and those are the Verses of Al-Ahkam (commandments, etc.), Al-Fara'id (obligatory duties) and Al-Hudud (legal laws for the punishment of thieves, adulterers, etc.)]; and others not entirely clear. So as for those in whose hearts there is a deviation (from the truth) they follow that which is not entirely clear thereof, seeking Al-Fitnah (polytheism and trials, etc.), and seeking for its hidden meanings, but none knows its hidden meanings save Allah. And those who are firmly grounded in knowledge say:

"We believe in it; the whole of it (clear and unclear Verses) are from our Lord." And none receive admonition except men of understanding. (Tafsir At-Tabari).

The above is a clear expression of cultism. Obey, shut up and follow. Those who don't follow the program are doomed in this life and the next.

Sura 3 spends a lot of time justifying Jihad and going through the early battles between the Medinan based Moslem bandits and forces of Jews and of Mecca. Needless to say, Allah makes it clear that Moslems are blessed and guaranteed victory over the Unbelievers. Violence in the name of the Allah cult, including an array of angels given by Allah to Moslems in the battle of Badr [622 AD, 3:123], is mandatory and expected. This chapter thus extends the violence and hate found in Sura 2. Unbelievers are simply demonized.

Sura 3 is one of the later revelations given by the moon deity to the greatest man in history.  Though this chapter is not as important as the last 2 which are Suras 9 and 5; nor as important as Sura 2, it is certainly one of the vital parts of Koranic theology, given to Muhammad near the end of his tyranny by his protector the Lord Hubal or Allah.

What does Sura 3 say about non-Moslems? A lot of violence. And we mean a lot. By violence we can use its true definition as a noun, which includes both material and other-worldly force as well as overt supremacist rantings.

The key to the Koran is this: it is dichotomous. Obey the moon deity and be 'saved'. Disobey and be killed, crucified, executed, or humiliated in both this life and the next [5:33].

Violence and Manichean supremacism in Sura 3 can be found in the following verses:

4, 7, 10, 11, 13, 19, 21, 24, 26, 28, 55, 56, 57, 60, 75, 77, 82, 85, 87, 88, 100, 102, 105, 106, 110, 111, 112, 116, 117, 118, 119, 125, 127, 128, 131, 149, 151, 152, 156, 162, 167, 169, 175, 176, 177, 178, 180, 181, 182, 185, 192, 196, 197

Some of the more colourful calls to violence include:

3-10 Verily, those who disbelieve, neither their properties nor their offspring will avail them whatsoever against Allah; and it is they who will be fuel of the Fire.

3-12 Say (O Muhammad SAW) to those who disbelieve: "You will be defeated and gathered together to Hell, and worst indeed is that place to rest."

3-28 Let not the believers take the disbelievers as Auliya (supporters, helpers, etc.) instead of the believers, and whoever does that will never be helped by Allah in any way, except if you indeed fear a danger from them. And Allah warns you against Himself (His Punishment) and to Allah is the final return.

3-56 "As to those who disbelieve, I will punish them with a severe torment in this world and in the Hereafter, and they will have no helpers."

3-106 On the Day (i.e. the Day of Resurrection) when some faces will become white and some faces will become black; as for those whose faces will become black (to them will be said): "Did you reject Faith after accepting it? Then taste the torment (in Hell) for rejecting Faith."

3-116 Surely, those who reject Faith (disbelieve in Muhammad SAW as being Allah's Prophet and in all that which he has brought from Allah), neither their properties, nor their offspring will avail them aught against Allah. They are the dwellers of the Fire, therein they will abide. (Tafsir AtTabari, Vol. 4, Page 58).

3-131 And fear the Fire, which is prepared for the disbelievers.

3-192 "Our Lord! Verily, whom You admit to the Fire, indeed, You have disgraced him, and never will the Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers) find any helpers.

3-196, 197 Let not the free disposal (and affluence) of the disbelievers throughout the land deceive you. A brief enjoyment; then, their ultimate abode is Hell; and worst indeed is that place for rest.

The above is pretty clear to any except Western Marxists, most academics, the media and the political elite. Islam is not Islamism, it is simply Islam. The world is cleanly divided into two parts. The house of War is the domain of the Infidel and must be warred against by pious Muhammandans.  Sura 3 contains many verses which mandate aggressive war against the Unbeliever on behalf of Allah [see 120-128, 149-160] for example.

Allah is the only free-will force in the Universe and he or it, will of course grant victory to those of 'faith', with 'faith', and 'believing' simply denoting pious Moslems and those who follow the Koran and Muhammad. But you must 'strive' against the Infidel and be rest assured of victory [3:123], as was achieved at Badr, and be content in knowing that Moslems will be granted paradise and the Infidel will find his abode in hellfire. 

No charity, no forgiveness, no love, no tolerance is expressed for non-Muslims in Sura 3, or any other Sura.  Only declarations of war and hate.  Sura 3 is a good read for those who wish to understand the Jihadic culture of Muhammad’s cult. 

There are no mistranslations of Mein Koran. Mein Koran is simply Mein Koran.

Even Yousef Ali's contrived translation cannot hide the violence against non-Muslims.

Saturday, November 9, 2024 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

Well over a century ago, in a debate over budget items, Churchill famously backtracked by calling the issue at hand, and its rather obvious mistake; a 'terminological inexactitude'. The last word is not even a word, but it denotes the obfuscation of the issue at hand. The premise of so much modern political bafflegab: 'I don't know what a woman is, I am not a womanologist....'   Lawyers are good with such verbiage, as are politicians desperate to keep their family business and guaranteed fortunes alive.

-Rodwell 1861

-Palmer 1880

-Wherry 1882

-Khan, Moslem translation into English, 1905

-Hairat, Moslem translation into English, 1919

-Pickthal a converted English Moslem, 1930

-Yusuf Ali, Moslem translation into English, 1934

-Arberry 1955

-Mercier, 1956

-Dawood, 1974

Islamophobia does not exist. Islamo Fascism does exist.

1400 years of Jihad. Maybe the idiots of the world will wake up.

Monday, October 28, 2024 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

Muslims want to:

• Kill the Infidel
• Rape the Infidel
• Conquer the Infidel and rule the planet
• Forcibly convert the Infidel 
• 'Kill, execute, crucify and humiliate' Christians (Sura 5:33)
  
• Kill apostates 

Yet if you object to 1400 years of Jihad, destruction, annihilation of Christianity and other non-Muslims systems and religions, you are the problem.  You are phobic.  You have a mental problem.  When 5000 Black Christian Nigerians are raped and slaughtered this year by Black Nigerian Muslims, it is the fault of the Black Christian Nigerians.  After all, the climate made the Muslims burn down their churches with priests inside, rape their women and take over their lands.  Or if not the climate, than 'tribal warfare' and 'inter-tribal conflicts'.  

 Historian Efraim Karsh summarises just how stupid 'Islamophobia' as a term is:

Styling himself the “Seal of the Prophets”, sent by God to pass his ultimate message to humankind, Muhammad expanded Islam from a purely Arab creed to a universal religion that knew no territorial or national boundaries. He also established the community of believers, or the umma, as the political framework for the practice of this religion in all territories it conquered; and he devised the concept of jihad, “exertion in the path of Allah”, as he called his god, as the primary vehicle for the spread of Islam. Muhammad introduced this concept shortly after his migration to Medina as a means to entice his local followers into raiding the Meccan caravans, developing and amplifying it with the expansion of his political ambitions until it became a rallying call for world domination. As he told his followers in his farewell address: “I was ordered to fight all men until they say, ‘There is no god but Allah.’”

In doing so, Muhammad at once tapped into the Middle East’s millenarian legacy and ensured its perpetuation for many centuries to come. From the first Arab-Islamic empire of the mid-seventh century to the Ottomans, the last great Muslim empire, the story of Islam has been the story of the rise and fall of universal empires and, no less important, of imperialist dreams. Politics during this lengthy period was characterised by a constant struggle for regional, if not world mastery in which the dominant power sought to subdue, and preferably eliminate, all potential challengers. …

It is true that this pattern of historical development is not uniquely Middle Eastern or Islamic. Other parts of the world, Europe in particular, have had their share of imperial powers and imperialist expansion, while Christianity’s universal vision is no less sweeping than that of Islam. The worlds of Christianity and Islam, however, have developed differently in one fundamental respect. The Christian faith won over an existing empire in an extremely slow and painful process, and its universalism was originally conceived in purely spiritual terms that made a clear distinction between God and Caesar. By the time it was embraced by the Byzantine emperors as a tool for buttressing their imperial claims, three centuries after its foundation, Christianity had in place a countervailing ecclesiastical institution with an abiding authority over the wills and actions of all believers.

The birth of Islam, by contrast, was inextricably linked with the creation of a world empire and its universalism was inherently imperialist. It did not distinguish between temporal and religious powers, which were combined in the person of Muhammad, who derived his authority directly from Allah and acted at one and the same time as head of the state and head of the church. This allowed the prophet to cloak his political ambitions with a religious aura and to channel Islam’s energies into its instrument of aggressive expansion, there being no internal organism of equal force to counterbalance it.

Whereas Jesus spoke of the Kingdom of God, Muhammad used God’s name to build an earthly kingdom. He spent the last 10 years of his life fighting to unify Arabia under his reign. Had it not been for his sudden death on June 8th 632, he would have most probably expanded his rule well beyond the peninsula. Even so, within a decade of Muhammad’s death, a vast empire, stretching from Iran to Egypt and from Yemen to northern Syria, had come into being under the banner of Islam in one of the most remarkable examples of empire-building in world history. Long after the fall of the Ottoman Empire and the abolition of the Caliphate in the wake of World War I, the link between religion, politics and society remains very much alive in the Muslim and Arab worlds.

If Christendom was slower than Islam in marrying religious universalism with political imperialism, it was faster in shedding both notions. By the 18th century, the West had lost its religious messianism. Apart from in the Third Reich, it had lost its imperial ambitions by the mid-20th century. Islam has retained its imperialist ambition to this day.

Imperialist.  Militarist.  Totalitarian.  Pagan.  Quite Fascist.  This is the cult of Muhammad.  It has no alignment, whatsoever, with a modern society.