Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was superior to anything Islam had developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions. Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'. Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.
The Hadith are the collected stories, sayings and imparted warnings of Mohammed, the founder of the collectivist, totalitarian Meccan cult devoted to the Allah [contraction ilah], the 'Lord' of Mecca, who was of course the moon deity or Hu'Baal. Mohammed's full name was Abdullah, or slave of Allah. The pagan and quite celestial antecedents of Hu'Baal or the Meccan ilah are obvious to any who have taken the time to study Arab history. Mohammed was no more than a deranged brigand, a thug with an army, who raped, killed, plundered, sex-slaved and murdered, whilst becoming incredibly wealthy. Academics and sundry experts declaim the life of this warlord illustrates a prophet-hood, holding high the mantle of religiosity, waving a standard of peace.
The Hadiths of Bukhari are the 3rd most important liturgical source of inspiration for Moslems, after Mein Koran, and Mein Sira [a purported biography of Mohammed]. They are holy. Following the Koran they are also quite bloody and intolerant. The Hadiths were written in about 900 AD or some 270 years after Mohammed's death. They were culled from the oral traditions, scraps of writings and the general Moslem memory. The Hadiths show a cult that is deformed, violent and Jihadic.
Bukhari's work is of dubious authenticity. It is massive, ponderous, incoherent, poorly written and organized. It thus mimics the Koran. The messaging is clear however. Mohammed is the supreme representation of divine favour. Everything he said and did was therefore of inestimable importance. If you don't follow this divine 'messenger' you transgress against the divine law and are thus open for punishment.
The main theme of Bukhari's Hadiths is 4:52:196:
Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah 's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' and whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)" (Bukhari Hadith, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 196) Source
Saved through Mohammed ? This is a plagiarism from the Bible. The New Testament discusses the human being 'saved' through his belief in Christ whose mission was the exact opposites of Mohammed's. Islam is thereby the anti-Christ doctrine. Christ tells his apostles:
Mark 16:15-18, "And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover."
In
Bukhari's Hadith passage above it is only Mohammed who can save
humans and provide salvation. One intention of Mohammedansim is to
replace Christ with the founder of the monotheistic ilah cult. But
why would anyone believe that a man who murdered, sex-slaved, owned a
harem, waged war, cut off the heads of Jews and Christians and
tortured his enemies can now magically 'save them' ? From what
exactly ? People like Mohammed ?