Mein Koran is based on pagan Arab polytheism and what was existing in Mecca, at the time Muhammad started his cult of Jihad. Mein Koran is rife with this reality. Al-Lah for example means the Lord, [not God in the J-C sense], and the Lord of the polytheistic shrine in Mecca was of course Baal, who was the ilah, or Chief of the Deities. Baal, or Hu;Baal, was the Meccan moon deity. Conveniently Muhammad's family was the deity's caretaker. Muhammad's last name was slave of Allah or Abdullah.

Jinns are part of Mein Koran's pagan package and Arab pantheistic rites. Jinns were little devils, believed to be active in the affairs of the world, many were evil, some were benign.

“And we do not understand whether ill is intended to those on earth, or whether their Lord (really) intends to guide them [the Jinns] to right conduct.” [72:10]

Jinns are usually associated with mischief and magic, though it varies within Sharia fasicsm and the locality. Today in Mecca, as a part of the ritual Hajj or pilgrimage, the true believer must throw rocks at these little demons to ward off evil. Nothing could be a more direct link to the late bronze-age and iron ages, than tossing rocks at pagan devils.

Unlike the Jinn, Jews and Christians are always evil. In this Sura of 28 verses only 9 preach hate against non-Moslems. Surely a moderate amount. The hate speech verses are:

Pagan Arabs, non Moslems, Jews and Christians must submit their worthless selves to the Allah-Muhammad cult, or face hell-fire, 72:14-15 is very clearly stated and bears repeating: “Amongst us are some that submit their wills (to Allah), and some that swerve from justice. Now those who submit their wills – they have sought out (the path) of right conduct: But those who swerve, - they are (but) fuel for Hell-fire'” [72:14,15]

As with every Koranic Sura, there is no higher ethical statement in these verses. It is just a cacophony of violence, rage and demands. This culture of intolerance, so obvious to any objective reader of the Koran, must inform Moslem society. It is impossible to reject the clear linkage between Koranic supremacism and Moslem intolerance and violence evinced and propounded on a daily basis in the real world.  It is also ignorant to evade the obvious bronze and iron age pagan rituals, rites, beliefs and stories, which suffuse Mein Koran, and which predate Muhammad, as in the case of 'Jinns', by thousands of years in some cases. 

It sounds like a 'discovery' from modern, secular 'science'. Mein Koran claims that Noah was a Moslem some 4600 years before Muhammadan fascism was fashioned in Mecca, in obeisance to Baal, Muhammad's family idol. Noah was a Muslim? Must be the science.

“Noah said: 'O my Lord! They have disobeyed me, but they follow (men) whose wealth and children give them no increase but only loss.” [71:21]

In fact the followers of Noah are pagans prostrating themselves before Gods, including celestial deities such as Baal, and atavistic, primitive cults, that only a Bedouin of the 7th century might recognize:

“And they have said (to each other), 'Do not abandon your gods: abandon neither Wadd no Suwa, neither Yaguth nor Ya'ug, nor Nasr';” [71:23]

I doubt that Noah and friends were worshipping Nasr since that Arabicized God form would not have been known to them. But the important point is of course that polytheism in any form, is punished by death in the Koran. This is why the great flood occurred which is narrated in the Torah and New Testament. Noah and the polytheists were being punished by the Allah-thing in Mein Koran:

“Because of their sins they were drowned (in the flood), and were made to enter the Fire (of punishment): and they found in lieu of Allah – none to help them. And Noah said; 'O my Lord! Do not leave of the Unbelievers, a single one on earth!” [71:26-7]

In that vein, Islam must be better than Christianity, a claim certainly made with great vehemence in the Koran. In Islamic theology the Jews and Christians are infidel sub-humans because they corrupted the supposedly uncreated work of the thing Allah, which Mohammed cleverly or through chance ignorance conflated with the Judeo-Christian ideas of divinity. Allah, or Hubal, has of course nothing whatsoever to do with J-C theology or with the Christian ideal of what truly is a 'God'.

In the plagiarization which marks out much of the Koran we find therefore that all the main players in the Torah-New Testament saga are of course 'Muslim'. Moses, Christ and Noah are now Muslims, as Muhammadism seeks in its supremacist lunacy, to surpass Judeo-Christianity. How can any sane person read the below passage without disbelief and even anger at the supremacist and ahistorical posturing so redolent of Koranic versing ?

“We sent Noah to his People (with the Command): 'Warn your people before there comes to them a grievous Penalty.' He said 'O my People! I am to you a Warner, clear and open: 'That you should worship Allah, fear Him, and obey me:...What is the matter with you that you do not place your hope for kindness and long-suffering in Allah, - “ [71:1,2,3,13]

According to Moslem propaganda, every human from Noah on downwards is a 'Muslim', or should be. This is why the great flood was enacted. The impure – the Infidel - had to be cleaned. This 'fact' also justifies modern Moslem terror. Why not kill, execute, humiliate, crucify and blow up non Moslems? After all, Noah's flood was enacted to erase non Moslems from the earth. Why can't Submission cleanse the earth of non-Moslems today ?

In Mein Koran, the Jews and Christians are evil people, exampled by the followers of Noah, who lost the right path and must be set right either by converting back to Islam, or through the divine punishment of the Allah thing. This illiteracy is also called supremacism. Further, to suggest that all of the great actors of Judeo-Christian scripture, such as Noah, were Muslims is just more proof that the cult of Islam is not associated with anything to do with reality, nor with any of the traditions and attributions of Western culture.

A casus belli for Rome in its struggle with the Baal cult of Carthage was child sacrifice. The Carthaginians worshipped Baal, an exemplar of the Babylonian Sin, or moon deity. Baal cults dominated the Bronze and Iron ages in the Near East, as did mystical beliefs in Evolution and naturalism. The Carthaginians slaughtered their young boys and girls in homage to Baal, soaking their blood into the North African soil in a barbarous gesture of appeasement and supplication. Baal cults were known to thirst for blood, both in war and peace. Draining the blood from young girls and boys was a covenant with the celestial deity, an embrace of pagan puritanism and atavistic license. The Carthaginians were originally Phoenician or Greek-Semitic mix from what is now Lebanon. They took Baal with them to North Africa. The slaughter of innocent children was immense and ran into the hundreds of thousands.

Islam also follows the cult of Baal. Al Lah means The Lord, and The Lord of Mecca at the time of mad Muhammad Abdullah [slave of Al Lah], was Baal, who was Muhammad's family deity. The red carnate statue of Baal dominated the Meccan Kabaa or cube, a collection of 360 idols and gods worshipped by the Arabs and which was a centre of pilgrimage making Mecca wealthy.

As with the Carthaginians, Moslems and Islam in-toto, shed, drain, and pour blood in oblations to Baal. The Moslem daughter-slaughter consumes some 20.000 girls each year within Moslem states – about 4 x the number of children murdered as sacrifices annually by the Carthaginians. The very clever people call these murders 'honour killings'. 2000 Moslem 'terror' attacks irrupt each year with Moslems killing apostates [less than pious Moslems], or the hated Jew, Christian and Infidel. The very clever people call these terror atrocities outbreak of mental illness.

Rape and public attacks are rife now in the Eutopia, a super state devoured by socialist and morally-relativist theologies. Up is the new down in the Eutopia. Moslems could rape the entire 60.000 Eutopian super-state staff, cut off their heads, blow up their buildings and the peasants would be regaled with 'nothing to do with Islam' stories from the useless lame brain media. Terror was a foundation of Moslem cult belief, and Mein Koran is riddled with 1600 verses of hate speech and terror against non Moslems. The Eutopia now uses 'hate speech' to terrorise its own compliant morally-relativist citizen knaves into compliance with the Islam-is-peace cult. How ironic.

Like all Baal cults, the draining of blood and the invocation of pain is central in Islam. Witness FGM. The clitoris is carved off with an unsterilized knife, or piece of glass. Because the clitoris is located so close to the urinary opening, that area becomes infected. This mutilation is sewn up, oftentimes incompetently or too quickly, usually with a dirty needle. A crude hole, much smaller than the normal opening, is excavated so that urine and blood many pass out.

This carnage induces shock, and sometimes the young girl – maybe as young as 7 – might die from it. If they survive, the chances are good that she becomes septic, or contracts septicemia. Then she will die in agony after 3 or 4 days of intense pain. With septicemia, the body and specifically the internal organs, shut down one by one, until the entire corpus is rendered dead. If the young girl survives and does not contract septicemia, she will suffer her entire life from urinary tract infections. The small, barbaric hole, which allows the emission of urine, does not contain meatus, or the mucous membranes which protects the interior of the tract from infection. The bacillus will naturally rise from the opening all the way up to the kidneys which sit at the apex of the urinary tract. The pain is insufferable and prolonged. The kidneys might well shut down and fail. She could die.

If the girl does survive into adulthood, or within Islam, at least until the age of 9, sexual intercourse becomes a litany of agony. The vagina is created to allow a penis to enter, as well as a baby to exit. It is a marvellous design, an organ of brilliant innovation. However, the Moslem FGM procedure has completely destroyed the functioning of the vagina. The man-made hole is too small and the pain centres inflamed due to the mutilation. There is no mucous at the opening, and no lubrication beyond the opening to receive an erect penis. This is because the clitoris, which generates the salve to reduce the pain of entry is gone. Excruciating agony is stimulated when there is an entry. The women must feel as if someone took a knife and jabbed it upwards through the imprecise hole. Intense pain would sweep up and consume the women who would enjoy only torment. Instead of a joyful union of man with wife; you have the barbaric painful imposition of man's pleasure with a slave.

FGM is something one would expect from a bronze-age inspired cult of Baal. It dehumanizes the woman. It sacrifices her for the man. It reminds the woman that with each entry, the man is Lord, supreme and can do what he wants. It is sick, psychotic, bloody, and should be outlawed everywhere there is civilisation. When Moslems profess their 'faith', ask them about FGM and what their views on it are. Ask them if they agree that mutilation, which can lead to death through shock, is 'religious', or if indeed it is just another instantiation of the Carthanginian-Baal cult and its lust for blood and pain. FGM is a poignant symbol of Islam's Bronze Age inspired Barbarism.

Brilliant and precise article on the base fact that Islam plunders, squats, pillages, and destroys. It does not assimilate, enliven, or empower. Bronze age celestial inspired pagan cults like Islam, are by nature, forces of death and destruction. This Al Lah is Baal and for the globalist-cultural Marxist elite, resplendent in their ignorance, they need to read about the death cult of Baal, embedded in corrupt paganism within the Canaanites, Hittites and other Near Eastern regimes and tribes. One of the reasons for the attraction of Hebraism was the sheer savagery, brutality, and lusts of the Baal cults.

'Prof. Abdessamad Belhaj also detailed how globalists are using Muslim migrants to turn Western countries into socially divided societies of easily-controlled consumers.

….Belhaj, who has authored four books and had more than fifty studies published in international publications, cautioned that as a result of the globalist system, “sustained poverty … is going to be the fate of a considerable portion of people in the West'

And

'The scholar of Islam and social sciences warned that large numbers of migrants are “calamitous” for the European people, and that neoliberal elites see Islamic terrorism, and state bankruptcy and collapse as collateral damage in their pursuit of endless wealth.'

Also,

'The Moroccan academic, who works in countries across Europe, stated that Muslim migrants view “all property as ‘given’ and not ‘acquired’ by work”. Professor Belhaj revealed that Muslims, therefore, believe that by taking Europe’s land, Muslims will be granted wealth.'

'He contended: “In Islamic discourses, migration is seen as a beginning of the Islamisation of Europe, the rich land that will change the fate of Islam, from a religion of the poor to a religion of the rich.'

Islam conquers. It does not assimilate. It also denudes and eats. It does not add, or enrich. It will feed off the Eutopian project. Welfare rates amongst Moslems are well over 50%, probably closer to 80%. In Moslemified urban areas, rapes, crime, social incohesion, cultural destruction abound. The importation of a failed cult, with failed adherents, who in many cases refuse to assimilate and demand Sharia Law and special 'rights', is either going to result in civil conflict and/or societal implosion.

Consider this fact - In Turkey the age of sexual consent is 9. The Euro elite is obsessed with admitting Turkey into its bankrupted Eutopian socialist kleptocracy. 80 million Moslems will be able to pass into the EUTopia. They will simply swamp Europe with Moslems, all part of the hijra or migration, which is always a part of imperialist Submission [Islam]. Do the Euro elite and their dimwitted Islamophiliac allies really approve of child sex under the rubric 'cultural enrichment'? Do they really support the sex slavery of women, FGM and the murders of 10.000 Moslem girls each year ? There is nothing enlightened or 'progressive' about a Bronze age inspired celestial cult, whose Al Lah is Baal the moon deity of Mecca.

In today's Orwellian world, Moslem-female sex slavery is now 'freedom'. Wearing bed-sheets which hide your personality and shape is 'liberating'. Females who are worth half of a man, enjoy 'equality and rights'. Sex slavery condoned in the Koran and still practiced in Islam, is now a 'cultural difference', akin to the daughter slaughter of innocent Moslem girls – itself written off by really clever people as a mere expression of domestic violence.

This Sura simply confirms the sexual license and obsession of Muhammad:

“O Prophet! Why do you hold to be forbidden that which Allah has made lawful to you? You seek to please your consorts. But Allah is oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.” [66:1]

Islam is in part of course a sex cult. Sex cults are not usually associated with religious observances. Further, this Sura has the usual rants against Unbelievers. The main import of the Koran, and its key message is that any who do not follow the Al-Lah deity, or Muhammad [both sound the same in the Koran]; will face 'torment' and certain 'hellfire'. How religious. How tolerant.

In this Sura of 12 verses only 5 preach hate speech against non-Moslems. The hate speech verses are:

Muhammad and all good Moslems who simply obey Allah [66:6] must 'strive hard against the disbelievers and be severe against them.' The disbeliever's abode is hell, their examples the disbelieving wives of Noah and Lot. They will provide the fuel for Hell and certainly slip on Hell's slippery bridge into the Fire on the Day of Judgement. How comforting, and how loving.

It is impossible to reconcile the 2 themes of this Sura with what constitutes a religion. First, Muhammad is to gratify his sexual lusts with 'gifts' of women from his alter-ego, the Al-Lah thing. Second, Muhammad commands himself and his followers to fight the Unbelievers, warning that those who do not follow his moon deity cult are doomed to be the fuel of hell-fire. Neither theme expresses anything other than grotesque intolerance and the opposite of what might be termed religious observance. 

Manage the female. Within Mein Koran, women are tools, objects and procreation devices. Men rule, women obey. That is a main theme of the pagan Meccan cult, which worships Baal [the iLah], and Muhammad [the totalitarian Jihadist, rapist, murderer, war leader etc. who today would be called 'radical'].

Nowhere in the Koran is there a pretext or legal code of 'female rights'. The best that can be said, is that a man who divorces one of his many wives, must ensure that she is taken care of, or given sustenance. This does not hold true if she has blasphemed or committed adultery.

“The Koran, and Islam in general is obviously and decidedly a misogynistic tool. There is little in the Koran which elevates women. It is quite clear that hierarchy exists within the Muslim world, with Arab males at the top and female slaves near the bottom. This Sura outlines the 'laws' regarding divorce and its first seven verses are the only verses in the Koran which one can consider to be 'nice' to women. For in these verses there are commands given by the impersonal force and thing Allah, on how men should approach a divorce – but as usual with the Koran, the text is so badly written and garbled that any number of interpretations can be collected from its reading:

.....There is no law here, just a general code of conduct. So don't divorce your women – plural – unless they have misbehaved. Notice that Islam allows men polygamy, but not females. It takes for granted the inferior status of women. In Suras 4, 9, 60 for instance which are written after this Sura, and elsewhere in the Koran, it is pretty clear that women do not have the same rights as men [they are half the value of a man]; and that a man can simply divorce a woman by saying 'I divorce you' three times. Thus the fallacy of quoting Sura 65 as an example of glowing female 'rights' within Islam is that the entire notion of female equality within the Koranic cult is false, and this Sura is anyways superseded by later Suras which in Islamic theology are far more important than earlier Suras.”

The first 7 verses are 'laws' or admonitions which are entirely at the discretion of the man who runs the household as a patriarchal monarch. He can determine what is 'lewd' or improper. There is no objective set of definitions as to what constitutes improper conduct on the part of the female.

Besides 'female management' there is the all important theme of violence against the UnBelievers. This is the 'good stuff' of Koranic theology. In this Sura of 12 verses only 4 preach hate speech against those who are either not Moslem, or dare to defy the thunderous strictures of the Al-Lah moon diety. How moderate.

Verse 11 lays out a fantastic hereafter for the pious Moslem and by contrast and default, an eternity of hellfire and doom for those who reject Allah's messenger. Severe torment awaits the Unbeliever [65:10], who is linked to evil in his disbelief [65:9]; and who will follow those in times past who 'revolted' against the 'commands' of the moon deity of Mecca. Toleration indeed.

Only those who submit and lose their individuality, free-will and rationality to the Al-Lah idol will prosper. The rest will simply be eradicated. This is a cult of intense intolerance merged with a rapturous and diabolical obsession about the Day of Judgement. It is fair to say that besides misogyny the Koran and the cult of Muhammad are fascistically and fatalistically entranced with the destruction of those who reject his prophet-hood. In that vein Islam does not differ that much from other pagan cults of communalism.  

Sura 64 weaves together the two main threads one finds in the Koran. Blind submission to the predestination power of Allah is absolutely mandatory. Violence and open hatred against those who reject the Allah cult encouraged and sanctioned by the deity. Reasonable people find very little religiosity within either theme.  Regard the verses below:

For some reason Baal the moon idol of Mecca, or 'The Lord' of Mecca [Allah] preordains some to be the winners in this life and the next and the rest to be loses, subjected to misery, hate and violence by Moslems. Unbelievers in Muhammad-Baal will be punished in this life by Moslems and face hellfire for eternity. Within this context by definition Islam denies free-will, rationality, and the Golden rule. Islam is a cult of predestination. It is the exact opposite of Christianity, in which free will leads to both reason and faith.

Muhammad aka Allah, the narrator in the Koran, also warns Moslem men that their wives [emphasize the plural] and their children might be evil and their enemies if they try to stop the man from submitting to Muhammad [aka Allah]:

In this vein violence against your wives or children is sanctioned – if they 'stray' from Islam or try to obstruct a man's duty in submitting his worthless self to Muhammad.

Muhammad and Baal are uber alles. Thus we read:

“Whatever is in the heavens and on earth, declares the Praises and Glory of Allah: to Him belongs Dominion, and to Him belongs Praise: and He has power over all things.” (64:1)

As with many Bronze age cults, and bronze age celestial totalities, Baal the moon deity owns everything. All people, assets, ideas, movements, thoughts, transactions, dreams, hopes; all are the property of the thing Allah. No need for free will, thinking, rationality or individual accountability. Just submit to this idol's rules and you will prosper:

“No kind of calamity can occur, except by the leave of Allah: and if any one believes in Allah, (Allah) guides his heart (aright): for Allah knows all things.” (64:11)

The key to the good life on earth and in the hereafter is complete obeisance to the Allah. This denotes a cult, not a rational approach to spirituality. Muslims cannot deny this. This phrase or some variation thereof is repeated on every single page in the Koran without exception.

What then constitutes a good Muslim? Prostration to the Allah idol, and following the dictums of his creator and spokesman, Mohammed:

“So obey Allah, and obey His Messenger: but if you turn back, the duty of Our Messenger is but to proclaim (the Message) clearly and openly.” (64:12) and

“Allah! There is no god but He: and on Allah, therefore, let the Believers put their trust.” (64:13)

Muhammad uber alles. That is the main theme of Mein Koran. 

An old priest – 86 years of age – defenseless and pioius, has his head cut off by Moslem Fascists in Rouen France. The MSM swing into the 'nothing to do with Islam' song. The Catholic Church headed by a cultural Marxist appeaser, Pope Frank, is rife and riven with socialist aka liberalist theologians, who promote, abet and condone Moslem fascism and terror. These men, including Pope Frank have the blood of this aged, unthreatening, peaceful man on their hands. The blood of the Moslem Jihad, the blood of European innocents is the fault of the Church, the secular elite, the MSM and the usual cadre of ignorant politicians and quackademics, who insist that 1400 years of Moslem Jihad be ignored, and that Europe become Islamified.

In France we have the great, peerless examples of Catholic courage and might; Clovis, Martel, Charlemagne, Pope Sylvester, Jean de la Vallet and others. Now we witness a church which sells land in a Jizya tax, to Moslems, who build their mosque right next to a Catholic Church, on land given to them by the Church, and whose parishioners must witness at a morning mass, the beheading of their priest by one of the Jihadist fascists, who makes his hate speech home at said Mosque.

The Catholic Church is finished unless its leaders grow a pair.

'On Tuesday morning, two terrorists associated with the Islamic State entered the parish church of Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray while 86-year-old Father Jacques Hamel was saying Mass. The assailants seized Father Hamel, made him kneel down and slit his throat on camera before taking the other members of the congregation as hostages. Both attackers were subsequently killed by police.

A block away, the Yahia mosque of Saint-Etienne-du-Rouvray was inaugurated in 2000, constructed on a plot of land donated by the Catholic parish where Tuesday’s attack took place.

Reports from France declare that the small Norman town is “known to be an anchor of the Jihadist network,” and the local “Salafist” mosque has been the spiritual home to several known Islamist radicals.'

A chapter schooling the Moslem faithful on the Hypocrites. The Hypocrites are of course those nasty Jews and Christians, and pagan Arabs, who inhabited Medina and who rejected Islam and who thought Muhammad just another madman [for good reasons]. Medina was Muhammad's principality where he ruled as sovereign for some 8 years, before leading an army to attack and reduce Mecca in 630 AD. Don't you see the parallels with the life of Christ, and the Muhammadan 'prophet' ?

Medina was where Mohammed fled with his small band in 620, ostensibly invited to help quell internal political and social disputes. Muhammad took refuge in Medina and abused the good offices of the Jews and Christians, living there. It was a coup. Medina was a wealthy trading center and once Muhammad and his brigands controlled the city, they had the money and power to begin their war against Mecca. All of this makes Islam a 'religion' of peace of course.

“They (the hypocrites) are the ones who say, 'Spend nothing on those who are with Allah's Messenger, to the end that they may disperse (and quit Medina).'” [63:7]

It did not take that long before Jews and Christians began to realize that Mohammed wanted to replace Judaism and Christianity, including the prophets of both, with Islam and himself. In following Mein Koran, Moslems in Medina began to demand that non-Muslims convert to the new cult of Mohammed and his Baal idol, one that the Canaanites, Hittites and other groups in the Old Testament had worshipped, and which was rife with immorality, sacrifice, whoring, enslavement and debauchery.

This Sura has 11 verses and the entire chapter is an exposition against the Pagan Arabs, Jews and Christians of Medina. Jews and Christians are dammed by Allah as liars, evil and doomed to hell-fire. They are portrayed as greedy, stupid and duplicitous. Allah has claim to all the riches on the earth. Verse 4 calls them 'the enemies'.

These attributes make it easier for the Moslems to kill them. The hate speech verses are as follows:

Allah owns you the human and all your assets including your children [63:9]. All the treasures, pleasures and 'signs' of existence are the property of Allah [63:7]. Humans must venerate only Allah, perform the Hajj or pilgrimage to Mecca, and donate money to the Moslem Umma to keep it strong [63:9-10]. Not doing so will result in your punishment by Allah [63:6]. Unbelievers are denigrated as evil, ignorant and untrustworthy. Death comes to those at the appointed hour [63:11] namely the Day of Judgement. The Al-Lah deity or the 'Lord Hubal of Mecca' knows all. Any actions against the Muhammadan cult will be repaid with vengeance.

This Sura makes it clear that humans must simply submit to the will of Koranic theology and the will to power liturgy of Muhammad aka Allah. Such a theme denotes a cult, not a religion. It would be a good exercise for Moslems to actually read the Koran and see the barren nature of this most cultish of documents.  

Submit yourself to Baal and Muhammad in the Friday prayer ritual. This is the purpose of the prayer. There is no inquiry, tolerance, or faith needed. Just submission to the Meccan deity Baal who is conflated with God and who seems to become confused with Muhammad in the Koran.

Baal decides who will follow him to power and paradise:

“Such is the bounty of Allah, which he bestows on whom He will: and Allah is the Lord of the highest bounty.” [62:4] [emphasis mine]

Remember Allah above all else:

“O you who believe! When the call is proclaimed to prayer on Friday (the Day of Assembly), hasten earnestly to the Remembrance of Allah, and leave off business (and traffic): That is best for you if you but knew!” [62:9]

“And when the Prayer is finished, then you may disperse through the land, and seek of the Bounty of Allah: and celebrate the Praises of Allah often (and without stint): that you may prosper.” [62:10]”

When you are done with your Friday ritual of mindless prostration and memorized 'recitals', then go forth and celebrate the Allah so that you might prosper. However benign this may sound to the multi-culti, there is always violence in Mein Koran. Injunctions to hate, demonize and 'strive' against the Unbeliever do of course make an appearance. Out of 11 verses in this Sura, only 4 advocate intolerance and violence against the Unbeliever. The hate speech verses are: 5, 6, 7, and 8. They warn the Jews, who are likened to donkeys, of their doom:

Jews and Christians who reject Allah, are little better than donkeys, fleeing from their deaths, to a certain doom ordained and orchestrated by the Allah deity. They are liars and hypocrites, some of them even pretending to befriend the superior and exalted Moslems. Deceivers. Allah knows they are criminals who only pretend to accept Moslems as equals, and he mocks the Jews asking them if they 'long for death' to prove how pure and truthful they are.

It is clear that such a locus of racism and Jew hate places Islam squarely within the realm of a cult. There is no harmony of the Golden mean, nor of the Golden Rule. The Koran including this chapter, exudes fanatical extremism which has to inform Moslem culture and attitudes.