French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  

Recent Articles

The Cult of Muhammad, slavery and war. White slavery is apparently unimportant.

Muslims enslaving and killing Whites. The big brains don't care.

Bookmark and Share


When 400.000 Blacks were trans-shipped to the southern United States, from 1650-1800, some 1-2 million Whites were enslaved in North Africa by Muslims, held along the ‘Barbary’ coast, during this same period.  Most died or disappeared into the Ottoman empire, or Arab Muslim states, worked to death in galley’s or mines, employed in harems or brothels (which is what a harem is) and discarded, or conscripted into Muslim forces and fed as fodder in battle.  No knee bending by Muslims or Arabs today when they encounter Whites.  No overpaid, dim-witted, ignorant professional athletes protesting the enslavement of the White man and woman. 


In fact, over 1400 years, Muslims have enslaved 25 million Whites, from Russia to Iceland, many as part of the sex Jihad.  This equates into 18.000 Christian slaves every year on average – probably a low estimate.  In Anatolia and the Balkans alone, some 3 million Christian boys, or roughly 7.000 per annum, were enslaved from 1363 to 1800 and forced to become ‘Janissaries’, the Muslim SS.  This is likewise a low estimate. 


White enslavement by Muslims is apparently a non-issue.  Not a whimper to be heard in quackademia or elsewhere.  White slavery apparently does not exist for the big brains.  Just the enslavement of Blacks is important not Whites.  Sadly for the Muslimophiles their favourite fascist cult accounted for some 50 million Black slaves from sub-Saharan Africa, and Muhammandans still own today, 5 million in East Africa.  Not a mention is made of either fact.


Why is the Muhammandan cult so obsessed with slavery, the sex Jihad and the use of Infidels as slaves for domestic, industrial and military usage?  The answer is that one of the ‘pillars’ of the Koran is slavery.  Every chapter of any length and importance discusses ‘what the right hand possesses’, or what has been taken in war, including sex slaves.  The Muslim Jihad is a war of domination, and the enslavement of the Infidel a mainspring for war and violence.


If we take Sura 8, named 'The Spoils of War', a long chapter but not analysed or discussed that often in comparison to Suras 2, 5, or 9, we can see that about 42 % of verses are hate speech against non-Moslems.  This hate speech openly incites slavery.  There are 75 verses in Sura 8 and 33 which could be classified as hate speech (inciting violence against another definable group, in this case, Jews and Christians).  The apogee of Sura 8 is verse 39 which advocates military Jihad.


And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily Allah sees all that they do.


Which echoes in 8-57:

So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.


Moslems must fight on until the House of War (the Infidel, non Muslim) is subdued. This is what is meant by 'no more tumult or oppression'. The existence of Infidels and ‘deniers’ of the Allah cult is simply insufferable to the pious Moslem. The Allah-thing's commandment is clear – every human must be in bondage and submission to the moon deity, or to the cult of Muhammad.


Verse 12 is also quite explicit in that terror, including Jihad, slavery, psychological and physical assaults, are part of the Jihad:  (Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."


Muhammad, or the leader of the Jihad enjoys 20% of the spoils of war.  This was a convenient revelation given to Muhammad by the moon deity Al-Lah, the Lord of Mecca in verse 41, just before the battle of Badr, a key early Muslim victory over the Meccans (622 A.D.): And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allah, and to the MessengerWe sent down to Our slave (Muhammad SAW) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) - And Allah is Able to do all things.


The messenger, who does little fighting, seems to reap the greatest single reward from war.  Sex slaves (Muhammad had over 20), gold, booty, rich luxurious products, all went to the ‘messenger’.  This is an obvious impetus to Jihad and expansion. 


A curious feature of Mein Koran is that the Al-Lah thing, when speaking to Muhammad refers to the messenger and all Muslims as ‘slaves’. Slaves of the Al-Lah.  Slaves to the Koran.  Cults need slaves and Muhammandanism, is a slave cult.  Do not think but obey.  Do not question but simply do.  This was the cultural ethos and ‘pillar’ Muhammad needed to create.  He was a slave to the Al-Lah, but all Muslims were slaves both to himself and the Al-Lah.  It is a necessary pre-requisite to establish a military cult.  And when you obey, Al-Lah is happy: 08-51, "This is because of that which your hands had forwarded. And verily, Allah is not unjust to His slaves."


Al-Lah is very kind to his slaves; and Al-Lah's slaves must punish and humiliate the Infidels, as stated in 8-59: And let not those who disbelieve think that they can outstrip (escape from the punishment). Verily, they will never be able to save themselves (from Allah's Punishment).  The Infidels can't hide from temporal Moslem wrath and war, nor from an after-life of 'grievous punishment'. By extension the Al-Lah, and Muhammad cult will only tolerate good 'slaves of Allah', who cause no 'tumult' or 'oppression' of Moslems and their beliefs. These good slaves must fight to purge the planet of non-Moslem belief. This theology of Infidelophobia, only takes up 42% of Sura 8. Surely a civilized amount.


Sura 8 makes a Global-Caliphate, only achieved through War, a necessity.  Verse 73 demands that, ‘..those who disbelieve are allies to one another, (and) if you (Muslims of the whole world collectively) do not do so (i.e. become allies, as one united block with one Khalifah- chief Muslim ruler for the whole Muslim world to make victorious Allah's Religion of Islamic Monotheism), there will be Fitnah (wars, battles, polytheism, etc.) and oppression on earth, and a great mischief and corruption (appearance of polytheism).’


Verse 8-72 is rather clear.  Muslims have a duty to impose a Global Caliphate for the Umma, using war and the attributes of war including terror, slavery, slaughter, deceit and violence in all its form to achieve that objective.  War is the 2nd most important pillar in Islam.  Slavery is a subcomponent of War.  Muslims must either kill, or enslave, the Infidel. 


Bukhari, the Hadith (which explain Mein Koran), Jihad, War and Muhammad

Jihad and terror the real 'pillars' of Muhammad's cult.

Bookmark and Share



Just like a Corona variant, the Islamic ‘variant’, suddenly appears out of nowhere, fully formed from long years of planning.  When Muslims commit Jihad, the mutant variant is immediately blamed.  The ‘100% safe and effective’ vaccine of Muhammandan orthodoxy could not protect against the corrupt mutation of the Muslim virus, which has of course, nothing to do with the real ‘strain’ of Muhammad’s cult.  This anti-reality philosophy demands that 'Islam' mutates by random chance into 'Extremism', 'Islamism', or 'Terrorism'.  Propaganda claims that events ranging from 9-11, to the mass murder of Christians in Nigeria, to the burning down of Notre Dame and 40.000 Jihad attacks since 9-11, and stacks of dead and wounded worldwide is unrelated to the Meccan cult.


In actual fact, Mein Koran and the Hadith are very clear.  Islam or Muhammadanism is terror.  Terror is used to forward the war aims of the cult, namely the subjugation of the Infidel ape and pig. 


Shut up and obey the Allah no matter what.  This means that Moslems, wherever they live, are Moslems first and foremost.  Muhammadanism is a complete system, encompassing and controlling all facets of existence and society, the political, spiritual, even the economic.  Muslims are the Umma or community within this complete system, who must deify Muhammad and submit themselves to his moon-God the Al Lah or Baal of Mecca, where Al Lah in Arabic means the Lord.  Baal was the Lord of Mecca and Muhammad’s family were Baal’s caretakers in Mecca. 


These phrases are from Bukhari’s Hadith, which are commentaries to clarify the incomprehensible nonsense that is most of the Koran (the comprehensible parts detail war, jihad, the enslavement of women, and submission to Muhammad).  Read the following and inform me where the tolerance is:


Bukhari: 4-203

Narrated Ibn 'Umar:

The 'Prophet said, "It is obligatory for one to listen to and obey (the ruler's orders) unless these orders involve one disobedience (to Allah); but if an act of disobedience (to Allah) is imposed, he should not listen to or obey it."


Obey Muhammad and you shall obey Allah. Maybe the 2 are the same? The Imam represents Muhammad and the Jihad.



Narrated Abu Huraira:

That heard Allah's Apostle saying, "We are the last but will be the foremost to enter Paradise)." The Prophet added, "He who obeys me, obeys Allah, and he who disobeys me, disobeys Allah. He who obeys the chief, obeys me, and he who disobeys the chief, disobeys me. The Imam is like a shelter for whose safety the Muslims should fight and where they should seek protection. If the Imam orders people with righteousness and rules justly, then he will be rewarded for that, and if he does the opposite, he will be responsible for that."


Note: This is obviously a bastardized version of Christ's famous parable of the last will be the first, and the first to last [to enter heaven]. Muhammad supersedes Christ and is put ahead of the Allah-thing.


Obey the call to Jihad. All the time.



Narrated Anas:

On the day (of the battle) of the Trench, the Ansar were saying, "We are those who have sworn allegiance to Muhammad for Jihad (for ever) as long as we live." The Prophet replied to them, "O Allah! There is no life except the life of the Hereafter. So honour the Ansar and emigrants with Your Generosity." ...."For what will you take the pledge of allegiance from us then?" He said, "I will take (the pledge) for Islam and Jihad."


The Moslem heaven resides in the shade covered by the swords of Jihad......see below.




Narrated Salim Abu An-Nadr:

The freed slave of 'Umar bin 'Ubaidullah who was 'Umar's clerk: 'Abdullah bin Abi Aufa wrote him (i.e. 'Umar) a letter that contained the following:--"Once Allah's Apostle (during a holy battle), waited till the sun had declined and then he got up among the people and said,"O people! Do not wish to face the enemy (in a battle) and ask Allah to save you (from calamities) but if you should face the enemy, then be patient and let it be known to you that Paradise is under the shades of swords." He then said,, "O Allah! The Revealer of the (Holy) Book, the Mover of the clouds, and Defeater of Al-Ahzab (i.e. the clans of infidels), defeat them infidels and bestow victory upon us."


There is no ‘scariant’ variant of Muhammadanism, which mutates into war, Jihad and terror.  Those are precisely the core characteristics of Muhammad’s cult.  

Peter Hammond: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam. Exposing the moon cult and Jihad

War and Jihad are the 2nd most important 'pillar' of Muhammad's cult.

Bookmark and Share


Jihad is the most vital pillar for the never-ending expansion of Muhammad’s cult:


“Allah’s apostle was asked, ‘What is the best deed?’  He replied, ‘To believe in Allah and his Apostle.’  The questioner then asked, ‘What is the next (in goodness)?’ He replied, ‘To participate in Jihad (religious fighting) in Allah’s cause’.


The Hadith, Al Bukhari, Volume 1, No. 25. (in Peter Hammond: Slavery, Terrorism and Islam, p. 69).


Those who deny the pillar of Jihad and its centrality for the Muslim cult are deluded ignoramuses. 


Peter Hammond’s excellent book ‘Slavery, Terrorism, and Islam’ will not be taught in ‘schools’ which en-masse present a Marxist-beatified, mendacious and illiterate view of Muhammadanism – the rightful name of the Muhammadan cult. Jihad or war is the central feature of Muhammad’s cult, its genesis originating in Muhammad’s leadership of 80 or so military campaigns over a mere 12 or so years. Every 2 months on average, Muhammad was leading a group to war.


As Hammond relates, slavery was not only accepted by Muhammadans, but it was also a central galvanising imperative which propelled Muslim war, conquests and Jihad across Asia, Africa and Europe.  This is especially true in Europe stretching from the Urals to Iceland, where especially in Eastern Europe, Central Europe and the Balkans, sex slavery or the sex-Jihad consumed millions of women.  The core element of Islam is of course Jihad and within this doctrine, slavery, a practice that Muhammad actively pursued with 20 odd sex slaves in his harem and various other slaves in his retinue, was a key driving force in the Jihad.


Of course we are told by sundry ‘fact-checkers’, ‘professors’, ‘experts’, ‘scholars’ and the self-proclaimed clever people, that Muhammad’s cult named submission, which demanded the submission of others to Baal or the Al-Lah of Mecca (the main idol of Muhammad’s Mecca was Baal, whose shrine was maintained by his family); and most importantly, submission to the only prophet and spokesman for Baal, conveniently being Muhammad himself, is peaceful and even ‘liberating’.


However, as Hammond notes, the core tenets of Muhammadanism, along with its 1400 years of endless slavery, blood, Jihad, and terror, are plainly at odds with the Mohammadophiliacs who declare the Baal-Muhammad cult to be a ‘religion’.  Hammond summarises the core tenets or ‘Pillars’ of Islam. No wisdom here. Just Bronze and Iron age savagery.


1-Daily confession of the Supremacist Shahada, which affirms that only Allah and Muhammad rule (see below). This is deemed the most important pillar because the supplicant confirms his submission to Muhammad and reiterates the intolerance of the Muslim cult and affirms that it will be victorious over non-Muslims. It is in effect a declaration of supremacism and war.


2. War and Jihad. This is the second most important pillar (according to Muhammad). The most vital aspect of Muhammadanism is the submission of everyone to Muhammad and the confirmation that non-Muslims will be either converted or destroyed. War and Jihad flow from the Shahada and Mein Koran with its 1600 verses of hate speech. The Shahada is found in Qu’ran 3:18.


3-Five daily prayers of the Salah to Muhammad and Baal reinforcing the Shahada and submission to Baal and Muhammad.


4-Keeping of the fast-during Ramadan in which Muslims are only allowed to eat or drink between sunset and sunrise (a practice emanating from the Bronze age long pre-dating Muhammad and imitating the Catholic lent).


5-The giving of alms (zakat) to Muslims and only Muslims.  Islamophiliacs and self-proclaimed clever people, apparently cannot name a single Muslim charity which helps non-Muslims.


6-Pilgrimage or Hajj to Mecca performed at least once during the Muslim’s lifetime (this obviously indicates Muslim imperialism, where the conquered Muslim must go and pray at the Arab-Muslim shrine the Kabaa, which long predated Muhammadanism).  Considerable wealth and booty have accrued to the Arabs by this commandment.


The pagan origins of Muhammadanism’s 6 pillars are rather obvious.


The Shahada – A Supremacist statement

This statement of Muslim supremacism is almost directly expressed in Qu’ran 3:18. A good critique of the intolerant nature of this Shahada, and its implications is found here.


“I bear witness that there is no deity but Al Lah, and I bear witness that Muhammad is the messenger of Al Lah.”


Do not believe Wikipedia and other corrupt sources and Muslim apologists. They replace ‘Al Lah’ with God.  The two concepts have nothing in common. Baal the Meccan moon deity is not God. These sites are duplicitous in their content, erasing for example all mention of the pillar of Jihad and war. Muhammad was very clear that Jihad was the second most important pillar (see quote above at the top).


The implications of the Shahada are obvious.  There is Al Lah and only Al Lah. There is Muhammad and only Muhammad.  Muhammad states that you must follow the Qu’ran and follow his instructions.  There is no other organising principle in life.  This manifest supremacism leads to a cult which by its design will be intolerant and atavistic.


As Hammond writes, there are 5 fundamental practices that Muslims must follow, based on the 6 pillars.


1-Muslims must believe only in the Al-Lah (though they are ignorant as to what Al Lah actually is), and Muhammad. You must never question either, with such doubts constituting a mortal offence. 


2-Muslims must believe in angels who will help only Muslims.  This is probably purloined from Catholic doctrine.


3-Muslims must believe in the ‘revealed’ books namely; the Taurat which includes the 5 books of Moses, and some of the Old Testament), the Psalms, the New Testament, and the Qu’ran. Given that the Qu’ran is violent declaring war and Jihad on the Infidel, it stands to reason that Jihad is not only a pillar of Islam, but its most important defining feature.


4-Muslims must believe in the Prophets send by Al Lah which number about 124.000 with the last and most important being Muhammad.  Given this ‘fact’ it is blasphemous, punishable by death to question or criticise Muhammad.


5-Life after Death based on pre-destination, in which pious and submissive (to Muhammad and Al Lah) Muslims are rewarded and non-Muslims, or Muslims who are insufficiently submissive and pious, regardless of how they lived, condemned with ‘Black Faces’ to Hell. This reinforces the blind obedience to Muhammad and his dictatorial demands one finds in the Qu’ran and Hadiths.


Given that one of the greatest existential threats to civilisation is the cult of Muhammad, it is terrifying that most people in the Western world are completely oblivious of its foundations, motivations and pillars, including the second most important pillar and imperative of Jihad.

Mein Koran, a summary.

Fascism is not a religion. It is a cult.

Bookmark and Share

Summary of Mein Koran:


  1. Moslems must fight in the name of Allah and Muhammad, and use all of their assets, money and even their lives to spread the Moon cult of Mecca.

  2. In exchange for 'striving' in the name of the Allah or Lord of Mecca, Baal the moon deity or Allah, might grant you an eternity in paradise [only males go to paradise and only those who are Koranic enough].

  3. Moslems cannot be friends with Jews or Christians, nor marry their women.

  4. Women must obey Moslem men.

  5. Moslem men may own sex slaves, a harem, 4 wives, and are superior to Jews and Christians.


The pagan cult of Islam is built on war, and its pagan documents, which have antecedents stretching back far into the Bronze-Age, adjures, encourages, nay demands, violence and war. In this vein Nazism and Islam are quite similar supremacist cults, both of which de-humanize their enemies [Jews, Christians, Slavs etc]; and sanctify war to exterminate these untermensch.


The following are typical Koranic verses of terror – a very partial list of 1600 such verses which academics, politicians and media talking heads know nothing about:


Kill the apes and pigs:

"kill the disbelievers wherever we find them" (2:191),


Fight against them until idolatry is no more and God’s religion reigns supreme.  But if they desist, fight none except the evil doers. (2:193)


Muhammad informs fighting Infidels is necessary because "it is good for us even if we dislike it" (2:216).


"And that God may test those who believe, and destroy the infidels." (3:141)


Jews and Christians will have their necks broken:

"O ye to whom the Scriptures have been given! believe in what we have sent down confirmatory of the Scripture which is in your hands, ere we efface your features, and twist your head round backward, or curse you as we cursed the sabbath-breakers: and the command of God was carried into effect." (4:47).


Jews and Christians are Satanic:

Those who believe, fight in the Cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Taghut (Satan, etc.).  So fight you against the friends of Shaitan (Satan); Ever feeble indeed is the plot of Shaitan (Satan)(4:76).


Jihad all the time:

"Relent not in pursuit of the enemy" (4:104)


"slay or crucify or cut the hands and feet of the unbelievers, that they be expelled from the land with disgrace and that they shall have a great punishment in world hereafter" (5:33-4)


"Strike terror (into the hearts of) the enemies of Allah and your enemies" (8:60)


"Fight (kill) them (non-Muslims), and Allah will punish (torment) them by your hands, cover them with shame" (9:14)


"I will instil terror into the hearts of the unbelievers, smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them It is not ye who slew them; it was Allah" (8:12, 17)


"And He orders us to fight them on until there is no more tumult and faith in Allah is practiced everywhere (8:39).


"fight and slay the Pagans, seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem" (9:5).


Jews and Christians must pay tribute:

"Make war upon such of those to whom the Scriptures have been given as believe not in God, or in the last day, and who forbid not that which God and His Apostle have forbidden, and who profess not the profession of the truth, until they pay tribute out of hand, and they be humbled." (9:29)


Jews and Christian neighbors need to be killed:

"Believers! Wage war against such infidels as are your neighbours, and let them find you rigorous" (9:124).


O Prophet!  Strive hard against the disbelieves and the hypocrites, and be harsh against them”  (9:73),


Unbelievers, even if a friend of a Moslem, need to die:

"God has bought from the faithful their selves and their belongings against the gift of paradise; they fight in the way of Allah; they kill and get killed; that is a promise binding on Allah... (9: 110).


O you who believe!  Fight those of the disbelievers who are close to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who are the Pious, (9:123).


"When ye encounter the infidels, strike off their heads till ye have made a great slaughter among them" (Sura 47:3).


"strike off the heads of the disbelievers....wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives" (47:4).


Say to those Arabs of the desert, who took not the field, ye shall be called forth against a people of mighty valour. Ye shall do battle with them, or [other translations have "until"] they shall profess Islam.”  (48:16).


Islam uber alles. One world, One Muhammad:

"He it is Who hath sent His messenger with the guidance and the religion of truth, that He may cause it to prevail over all religion. And Allah sufficeth as a Witness." (48:28)


"He has sent His messenger with the guidance and the true religion, and will make it dominate all religions, in spite of the idol worshipers" (61:9).


"O Prophet! Make war on the infidels and hypocrites, and deal rigorously with them" (66:9)


This constitutes a very partial list of some 1600 such verses which declaim against the Satanic, greedy, stupid, wayward, dishonest, untrustworthy Kufar ape and pig. Such declamations render Islam a cult of death and hate, not a religion.


Yet we see every week that the brain dead of the world are utterly astonished when Moslems kill, crucify, rape, slaughter, and destroy the lives, homes and assets of Christians and Jews. Maybe they should read Mein Koran.  

The Rise of Western Christendom: Triumph and Diversity, A.D. 200–1000. Peter Brown.

Fantastic book. A must read.

Bookmark and Share


Peter Brown is a Professor at Princeton and has produced one of the great classics outlining true history from the Germanic takeover of the husk called the Western Roman empire, to the rise of Christianity and the creation of the modern world via the syncretic development of the pagan with the Christian.  A religious group, which before 315 AD was persecuted, marginalised and comprised no more than 10% of the Roman population, Christianity post Constantine developed into an ideal and foundation for European culture and eventual global domination.  This established fact is derided by the usual array of post-modernists, Atheists and ‘Enlighteners’ who ignore the very pagan and barbaric aspects of ‘classical’ civilisation.  Without Christianity it is likely we would still be sacrificing humans to wood gods, and living in clans with very little technological advancement in any form discernible from 200 AD.  There is nary a claim to a ‘dark age’ since as Peter Brown records and details, none existed.  Turbulence, change, synthesis, and our own ignorance do not validate ‘darkness’. 


The book is large and covers an enormous geographical area from Iceland to Western China.  I remember watching a video and reading various blogs, with Atheists deriding medieval Christians believing in ‘Prester John’, a Christian King in China who would ally with the European Christians during the Crusades of the 13th century and help Christian Europe defeat the Muslim Jihad.  Just another example of superstitious Christian ignorance and stupidity, the self-congratulating geniuses will say.  Except there was a Christian Kingdom in Western China, artefacts date it to at least 800 A.D. if not earlier and it lasted many centuries.  This rich state was Nestorian Christian, a sect that deviated from the Orthodox-Chalcedonian Church in matters of Christ’s divinity (given post birth).  It was large and populous for the time, cited close to major trade routes that linked China with Eurasia.  Peter Brown mentions this to his credit.


It is one of the few books I have read covering Medieval history, in which there can be very little disagreement with the author’s treatment of the subject.  Some of the more important aspects of Brown’s engrossing and important work include the following.


Christianity was before 200 AD primarily a North African and Asian religion.  A fact easily lost with our Euro-centric view of history.  This means that the Euro-Christianity which developed owed much to these sources which shaped the particular brand of Christian-Catholicism which emerges by the 7th century as something rather different than the Eastern Christian sects.


The constant presence of the profane, pagan pre-Christian world and the interaction with Christianity is an unexplored theme.  There was a syncretic relation across Europe between the Roman and pagan, and Christianity.  Christianity did not supplant paganism in most areas, as much as merge with it.


Most of what we know about the pagan pre-Christian world comes from Christian writers who were mainly monks.  Without this library outlining pagan customs, sagas, rituals, beliefs and creation stories, and legends of how gods and demons worked in our material world, we would know very little about pre-Christian Europe and North Africa.


Education in Christianity, including obviously literacy, was highly prized and was developed early in the Church.  This created a class of highly educated, aware, and literate professions within the Church which allowed the development of more complex socio-economic organisations, complex trade, political organisation and governance.  Power and brute strength was post Rome, not enough.  Culture, ethos, morality, common laws, extended trade which benefitted the general masses, and ‘justice’ which was blind to rank, became just as important.  Christianity provided for and filled these needs.


The Muslim Jihad starting in the early 7th century disrupted and deranged a rich Christian civilisation which stretched from Spain to Western China with pockets of Christian domination existing even in Sassanid Persia.  Trade, the economy, money, materials and resources all were vastly diminished and created a great contraction in both the Eastern and Western Christian states, with the Muslims almost overrunning all of Europe, stopped finally by the Christian Franks at Poitiers near Tours in 732 (Brown says 733) A.D.  Without that victory Christian Europe was probably conquered.


The Roman empire was not a monolithic ‘great classical’ civilisation as expressed by anti-Christian enthusiasts and atheists.  By their own false account Rome ‘fell’, which logically indicates it was not that strong.  It was in effect taken over during a 150 year period, by German mercenaries and military.  When Rome ‘fell’ technological development was static and poor.  In a few centuries post 476 AD Europe was covered in windmills and watermills, heralding an age of mechanisation and improvement.  Greater productivity means greater wealth, and it this economic prowess which generated the funds for advanced military arts and tools, which allowed the Christians to reclaim Spain and for a while the Holy Land and drive the Muslim Jihad back to its core. 


‘Barbarians’ as given to us by Roman propaganda did not really exist, especially along the borders.  There was much contact along the Roman ‘limes’ with non-Roman states, tribes and clans.  Many were highly Romanised long before 476 AD.  It was a porous world and trade and culture were exchanged.  Rome did not own civilisation, any more than non-Romans owned barbarism.


Christianity is not static.  The Christian religion has changed by region, by year, by century since 200 AD.  It continues to do so today (albeit in the wrong and irreligious direction).  It was a dynamic, inclusive, and open religion.  The institutions of Christianity thus developed more slowly than we believe (baptism, the cemetery, rites and prayers).  The Church was not fully formed in any sense, even by the time of Augustine (~400 AD).  It took many more centuries.


The Church post Rome maintained not only Roman law, but also much of the existing pagan law.  Justinian the great Christian emperor of the Greek Romans (early to mid 6th century), codified Roman law in the Justinian code.  Using this, Christians throughout Europe, over many centuries amended Justinian’s codex to include local ‘pagan’ laws, with clear examples being the Franks, Visigoths and Saxons.



It is little known, that the 7th century was a watershed.  The Muslim Jihad erupted.  But thankfully for civilisation and our own development, the Christian world had become wealthy and educated.  Architecture was rich and varied.  Libraries at hundreds of monasteries were common.  Monks and writers outside the monastery had the time and patronage to fill volumes on history, religion and science.  Cities were re-energised as trade emerged post the Justinian induced civil war in North Africa and Italy.  Confidence and function were restored to urban centres and their hinterlands.  We see technology being applied using water and wind power, to generate great leaps in efficiency in farming and manufacturing.  The 7th century is often overlooked, but it sets the foundation for what follows.


There is much more which could be discussed.  But the book needs to be read by anyone interested in how or why Europe developed the way it did and how Christianity allowed Europe to not only survive the implosion of a pagan, brutal, slave centred and corrupted Roman empire, but surpass it in all areas, in all aspects, in everything that matters in the material and spiritual worlds.


The Message from Muhammad's cult to Christians, 'We will eliminate you'

Hate and intolerance.

Bookmark and Share


Raymond Ibrahim compiles the Muslim Jihad against the Christians during September 2021.  You could pick any month of any year, for the past 1400 years, and compile similar tragedies and intolerance.  Source


Anas Khalifa (the name says it all), who for 20 years was a renowned Salafist preacher, now renounces Salafism, calling it a cancer with a deranged world-view which is spreading rapidly among young Muslims worldwide.


As the Taliban consolidates its power, a genocide, or at least a general persecution of the few Christians who remain in Afghanistan is likely.


The Taliban are compiling lists of Christians and their communities, even going door to door to search for Bibles. 


In Afghanistan ISIS Muslims murdered 4 Christians – for simply being Christian.


Christians in Nigeria who welcomed Fulani-Muslim tribes to farm and be a part of their communities, are now being killed and persecuted by the same.


50 Christians were slaughtered in Nigeria in one week, in one state, by Muslim Fulani.  On September 24th a Sunday, another 44, in another state were murdered by the same.


Christians are on trial in Egypt for writing about their lives as Coptics in Muslim-Sharia Law Egypt.


In Israel a Muslim man murdered his mother for converting to Christianity.


In Uganda, Muslims attack 5 young converts from Muhammadanism to Christianity, killing one boy.


Churches, prayer halls and directories, attacked and demolished (during September) in Nigeria, Egypt, Iran, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Pakistan.


As Raymond Ibrahim states, the basic message from those who take the Koran and Muhammad seriously to Christians is one of hate and intolerance.

Muhammad, the example of Christianity and the allure of Empire

His life as a merchant would have shaped his world-view.

Bookmark and Share


Was 7th century Muhammadan Arabia a ‘desert backwater’?  The Arab states by 620 A.D. had long been in contact with the Roman Empire (since the time of Constantine in the early to mid-4th century) and the Persian or Sassanid empire in the Mesopotamian basin.  The Arabs were significant long-distance merchants, and their camel convoys were an important logistical supply train within the Near East.  The ‘frontier’ tribes would have been well acquainted with both Rome and Persia and by default, these tribes would have been acculturated to the accoutrements of higher civilisations.  It is not entirely accurate to state therefore, that the Muslim Arabs erupting into the area of Syria and Mesopotamia in 636 A.D., were completely savage or ‘barbarian’.


Many Arab tribes were Christian as well as Jewish.  No one knows the demographic or religious breakdown in 7th century Arabia, but it is understood that the richest settlements were Christian and Jewish and populated the entire peninsula, including Yemen.  Given the long-distance trade routes and the active Christian and Jewish communities along these routes, it can again be surmised that not all of Arabia was a barbarian land.  It was the very presence of numerous and wealthy Christian and Jewish settlements which lead to the formation of Muhammadanism, itself a melange of pagan beliefs, misunderstood stories from the Old Testament and fragments from the New.  It was not a heretical Christian sect as wrongly perceived by the Byzantines (Chalcedonian-Orthodox) and Syriac Christians (Nestorians), when the Muslim armies swept into the Eastern Roman and Sassanid empires. 


Muhammad himself was a merchant, first working for, and then marrying a wealthy merchant widow Khadija, who was much older.  He would have been a long-distance carrier of goods and merchandise, heading across the Roman and Persian borders to entrepots and trading centres.  Undoubtedly, he encountered the richer Christian and Zoroastrian cultures, and would have seen the wealth of both empires.  Both states had a unifying culture centred on religion.  He would have seen the power of a centralising and unifying aegis of belief.


In Byzantium the heartland down to the coast of Judea and Egypt was Orthodox-Chalcedon, agreeing that Christ was both man and divinity, and that the man died on the cross and rose again to show he was divine.  For the orthodox the nature of Christ as both God and man and was indivisible and occurred in the womb through the immaculate conception.  In this view, Christ was of two natures but a singular God-man, God died with the man on the cross and both rose again on the 3rd day after the Crucifixion.  In Syria and spreading across Persia into Western China were the Nestorian Christians who viewed Christ born to Mary as a human, that the divine nature of Christ did not exist in the womb.  Mary was thus, not the mother of God.  Nestorians believed that the divinity of Christ was given outside the womb.  


There were many complications and divisions within Eastern Christianity and much fierce debating and theological theorising and design.  The Arab Christians would have been involved in such disputes which were at the core of Christianity.  Who was Christ?  How can a man be a God?  Why would God choose Mary to birth the Christ?  Is the Trinity indivisible?  Or is the God-Man who is the word, divisible?  What is the nature of the Trinity?  These are complex issues and not easily understood nor resolved.  Muhammad and the pagan Arabs were likely aware of them and of the great energy and passion that went into such debates within Christian communities.


Importantly, Muhammad would have seen first-hand, just how ruptured and horribly crippled both Persia and Eastern Rome were by their endless, vicious wars, which included widespread raiding, slave-trading, and wanton destruction of farmland and city.  By 630 both empires were exhausted, depleted, financially unstable and the entire Near East, desirous of peace.  This depletion of imperial power and deprecation of manpower and wealth, would have been obvious to the traveling, alert merchant.  This must have made an impression on Muhammad and is probably why before he died (632), he wrote arrogant, imperious letters to both the Roman and Sassanid courts demanding they submit to Arab-Muslim rule.  His appreciation of their weaknesses was not without great merit.


It is not an exaggeration to state that Muhammad’s experience as a merchant, his interaction with wealthy, urbanised and sophisticated Christian communities, his observation that a unifying religious belief could weld a single population into a potent force, shaped his ambition to change Arabia from a peripheral land, with disparate, disunited tribes, into an unified empire which would spread and dominate the Near East. 


The Fall of Rome and the Invasions of the Musulmans

Some key reasons why Muslims were able to conquer half of Christendom

Bookmark and Share



One of the most remarkable myths about the Roman Empire, is the image of an implacably dominant Rome, whose society was an apogee of progress and stability, whose colossal presence throughout its Western empire was perceived as immanent and immutable.  While there is much to commend Roman engineering, building, urban development and planning, and the management of water, the truth is that Rome was an economic chimera, built around the military, premised on economically restrictive massive taxation, extraordinary tolling of trade and income, and a huge bureaucracy. 


It was a slave empire.  Innovation and technology were largely eschewed for slave labour.  It was also a latifundia empire.  A small cadre of families ran the empire post Julius Caesar, with civil wars the inevitable result.  It was a mercenary army post 250 A.D.  Germans ran and populated the military.  This guaranteed conflict and civil wars between generals and their followers who depended on the rapine and plunder of war for their wages and riches.  Rome was economically frail, the long trade links around the Mediterranean and beyond notwithstanding.  This must be true given that post 410 A.D. in Britain for example, when the legions left and after 476 A.D. in Italy, when Odoacer the Goth removed and pensioned off Romulus to a comfortable villa near Naples, there was felt in many parts of the former empire, an economic and social decline.  The centralised state and its tentacles had been removed.  It was not a ‘fall’ but a contraction as the Roman military, the central focal point of the economy, was basically shut down and replaced by localised German run kingdoms. 


However, no profound changes outside of Britain can be detected.  As Pirenne writes, ‘Considering matters as they actually, were, we see that the great novelty of the epoch was a political fact: in the Occident a plurality of States had replaced the unity of the Roman State.  And this, of course, was a very considerable novelty….There was no profound transformation except in Britain.’  Outside of the British isles, the Mediterranean world still dominated, now centred upon Constantinople, not Rome.  There would have been economic and social dislocation, and contractions due to the obvious changes in local and regional governance, power and even localised legal charters.  But the essential Roman character and the southern foci of Western Europe remained in place.  In many areas there was little to no changes, in some, incessant brigandage and small-scale conflicts.  In others, trade reorientation and dislocation.  In some areas urban centres declined, in others they remained the same.  In some locales the local Roman infrastructure of roads, bridges, baths and public buildings were abandoned, in others they were repaired and improved.  There was no ‘fall’ across the great diversity and distance of Western Europe. 


The greatest disruption until the triad of attacks from the Musulmans, Vikings and Avars (Huns), came from the Byzantines and Justinian’s invasions of North Africa and Italy, creating a savage war that marred the land for 40 years in the mid-6th century.  Socio-economic life in most of those areas must have been deranged.  But in France and elsewhere, life began to improve.  Recent evidence proves Pirenne wrong about the Merovingian dynasty which preceded the Carolingian.  Pirenne believed that the Merovingian empire decayed and was taken over by the successors to Charles Martel.  In this reading, the Merovingians are corrupt, distant, ineffective rulers, who dissipated the great wealth of their Frankish kingdom.  In actual fact it is now rather clear that the renaissance of Charlemagne was founded upon the wealth and riches of the Merovingians.


In any event, the most important point raised by Pirenne is the fact that Western Europe suffered a reversal and decline with the coming of the Musulman invasions in the 640s in which they conquered the southern and Christian half of the Mediterranean Roman empire, including taking the merchant navies and trading entrepots of Syria, the granaries and food depots of North Africa, the magnificent and rich urban areas of Spain and southern France, and the important islands in the Western Mediterranean.  The former Roman and Christian unity around the Mare Nostrum was shattered, trade linkages were ended, raw materials and supplies were now directed toward Baghdad, and urban plantations and ports along the Tyrrhenian and Adriatic seas were diminished and, in some cases, completely effaced.


The glaring truths are that the Roman empire was never as economically vibrant or as solid as historians and ‘experts’ maintain, and that the various ‘dark ages’, were economic and social contractions arising from war, invasion and plague.  The worst event was the Musulman invasion of the 7th century, which succeeded because in the 6th century, Eastern and Western Christianity had engaged in a colossally bloody and pointless civil war which exterminated 2 generations of men, from which the militaries of the combatants never fully recovered.  Added to this was the endless Byzantine war with Sassanid Persia, further depleting men, treasure and economic vitality.  Superimposed on these wars was a real pandemic plague in the 6th century which probably killed 30% of the population.  These are important and signal reasons why the Musulmans were able to conquer half of the Christian Roman empire in little more than 70 years. 



Communism's war on the Church in 1930s Spain, is a dark echo of what is happening today

Fully supported by a corrupt, criminal cabal in the Vatican.

Bookmark and Share


Communist regimes were and are Atheistic.  They don’t tolerate centres of opposition including Churches, associations not aligned to the State, political organisations with meaningful support, broadcast media who do not support the ruling cult, and corporations who are not under State control.  Local associations, youth clubs, and agencies outside the State are not usually tolerated.  Nazi Germany had the same programme, initiated by an Atheist cult much opposed to Christianity and as the Nuremberg documents revealed, was planning for the complete abolition of the Churches and the creation of a ‘Reich Kirche’.  The Nazis murdered some 5 million Christians using bullets and gas.  Not many books, not a single movie about this holocaust, named by Jewish historian Max Dimon as the ‘unknown holocaust’.


One obvious objective of the Corona Reset and New World Order is the utter obliteration of Christianity, with the half-wit fools in the Vatican and national Churches being willing accomplices.  Lockdown policies targeted Churches, closing them down, locking their doors, arresting Priests who did not comply, levying fines against the recalcitrant, and forcing the faithful to be terrified of any group larger than a handful and the spread of the ‘scariants’.  Abortion clinics, places to buy alcohol, ‘entertainment’ venues, were open.  But not the Churches.  Grafted with tax money, every Church has complied with the Corona totalitarianism, with very few dissenters and those who do dissent are vilified by their own Churches, often punished and removed.


The Great Reset purports to demolish Western Christianity and erect a new Church, perhaps the Church of ‘Reason’ (akin to what the French Atheists tried to establish but failing following 1789), or the Church of the Free-Masons and Lucifer worship, or the Church of the Science melding religious belief with a technocracy who uses Science (fraud, data torture, propaganda) to assemble and manage the clueless mass.


Once the Corona Fascists remove the Churches, what organisation will be safe from their predations?  Spain suffered a civil war, with the Fake News, and Fake historians almost in unison taking the ‘side’ of the Spanish Communists against the hated and ‘Fascist’ Franco.  Franco defended the Church and historical state of Spain against a philosophy of Lenin and Mao, one dedicated to destroying the Church.  Yet, I would imagine that a majority of ‘learned’ certainly the Vatican and Pope Frank the Insipid, would bellow a full throated defence of the Spanish Communist destruction of the Catholic Church with a full depreciation of Franco. 


What can happen in an Atheist-Communist (or Humanist as they sometimes call themselves) state, can happen in the Age of Medical Corona Nazism.  The Communists gained power in Madrid and other areas in 1931.  It did not take long for them to enact a modern ‘Reign of Terror’.  This terror initiated the civil war of 1936-39.  An example of fascistic intolerance of the Church by the Communists in Spain includes inter-alia, the following.


·       Madrid, November 6, 1936, the Communists simultaneously executed about 2,400 political prisoners (including more than 200 priests, nuns and seminarians). Republican movements (anarchists, communists and socialists).


·       In Barcelona at least 58 churches were burned down from 1931-1936.  Only the cathedral has survived. 10 thousand volumes from the richest collection of the cathedral library in Cuenca were savagely burned.


·       Across Madrid and Barcelona there were public burnings of icons, Catholic statues and liturgical books. Official sources noted that in the period from February to July 1936 alone, 170 churches were burned to ashes across the country. 


·       The impunity for these anti-religious acts of violence was one of the reasons for the outbreak of the bloody civil war in Spain (1936-1939).


·       A total of 7,937 clergymen died from executions and torture, incl. 11 bishops, 5255 priests, 2775 monks and nuns.


Happening again today all over the world. Atheist-Humanist-Communism attacking churches all over the West, burning 50-odd in Canada alone, desecrating hundreds in Europe and USA. Rona diktats targeted the Churches and will do so again shortly. The premise is to wipe out Christianity and install Luciferian-Free Masonry or the 'Church of Reason' in its place.  Not much has changed since the Communist generated civil war in Spain, except this time the Vatican is fully supporting its own destruction. 

Bergoglio is a Criminal not a Pope

He is effacing the Catholic Church and demanding a New World Order

Bookmark and Share


Pope Francis is part of a criminal cabal intent on reshaping Global Economics and Politics and effacing the old Western traditions and installing the New World Order.  There is no doubt that the Argentinian Pope is actively trying to destroy both the Church and European Christian cultural foundations.  The Vatican and Churches in every country have almost without exception, accepted, promoted and distributed the false and pre-planned Corona pandemic narrative.  Any Priest or Bishop who has not complied has been threatened with both re-education and defrocking.


We can conclude that Bergoglio is not really a Catholic or he is a Catholic who hates most of Catholic history and the institution of the Church as it was constructed just a short while ago under Benedict and John Paul II.  But it is not just the support of the Corona Fascism which troubles and deranges.  Bergoglio is a disaster on every subject including supporting non-existent climate change, the unfettered Muslim-African invasions of Europe, doing nothing to combat the Muslim Jihad against Christians raging in parts of Africa and Asia, appeasing the Chinese Communist Party by sacrificing Catholics and their rights and freedoms in China, reframing Catholic truths as options, stating that the Catholic Church is only one way to God and maybe not even the truest, emasculating the Catholic mass and getting rid of any who oppose his radicalisation.  In short Bergoglio is an anti-Catholic, anti-civilisational Pope. 


Bergoglio might well support Free Masonry, itself a bizarre anti-Christian Luciferian cult dedicated to ending nation states and Christianity.  Whatever the real dynamics emanating from the Vatican, the facts are that the Catholic Church is criminally responsible for being a large and supportive partner in the Corona fascism and its attendant death, injury and destruction.  It is likely that 20 million are now injured from just 2 rounds of the poison injections and some 1-2 million dead from the same. 


Bergoglio and the Vatican are rotted with homosexuality and evil.  We are witnessing with Bergoglio the end of the Catholic Church as a moral force in the world.  God is done and God is now denied.  Bergoglio and the Corona cabal want a return to the age of Baal (moon deity, evil), or Luciferianism (sun worship, free masonry). An age of Darkness.


The ’Enlightenment’ which informs Bergoglio’s beliefs and materialism leading to ‘humanism’ (or communistic theologies) led us here.  The ‘Enlightenment’ demanded only ‘one truth’, ‘one way’, ‘one system’, it screams ‘follow the science’ never asking what does that mean?  It rejects free will, free speech, inquiry and reason.  In this vein it sets up people to reject truth and reality and view ourselves as Gods. No natural law, no God given rights, no moral purpose, no repercussions.  A Godless age is a Rona age.  Murdering means saving, stabbing poisons into people against an IFR of 0.15% means health, data fraud is truth, individuality is immoral, freedom is selfish, intolerance is compassion and a ‘pass’ is about health and safety.


Bergoglio has desecrated the Catholic Church and sided with evil.  He goes without God and rejects God and his Church.  He demands we submit to a New World Order premised on flu Fascism and intolerance and evil.  This makes him and the Vatican criminal murderers and usurpers. 


“When people stop believing in God, they don’t believe in nothing – they believe in anything.” – G.K. Chesterton


Genesis 6:5: “And God saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually.”


Jeremiah 7:24: “But they hearkened not, nor inclined their ear, but walked in the counsels and in the imagination of their evil heart, and went backward, and not forward.”


Ecclesiastes 1:2: "Vanities of vanities, all is vanity."


Nothing has changed over 2500 years.


And the vanity of being your own God leads to the chaos and evil of this age.


Sura 4 and Jihad. Kill Christians who are allied with Satan.

Not much love, no sign of the Golden Rule.

Bookmark and Share


Sura 4 is a very important ‘chapter’ within the book Recital (Koran) inciting war, Jihad and Christianophobia.  33% or more of this chapter is Christophobic and Infidelophobic.  In Sura 4 or 'The Women', just in the first 90 verses along, one finds 30 Christophobic statements. Quite a large amount from a cult supposedly dedicated to world happiness and inventing everything.


Sura 4 is often referenced by more ‘pure’ Muhammadan organisations such as ISIS, Hamas, Hizbollah, Boko Harem, Palestinian Jihad, Al Qaeda or the 100 other Muslim Jihad groups to justify their slaughters, attacks, and slavery of non-Musulmans.  You would know none of this if you source of information were universities, the ‘news’, or ‘social media’, in which Twitter and Facebook actively purge and erase any posts even mildly critical of Muhammad’s cult.  Most of their offshore staff are Musulman.

Most of this Sura is a recitation of early Iron Age 'Laws', something one would expect from a backwards Bedouin society of pilfering nomads. Most of the statutes are banal, obtuse and emanate from an uncultured impoverished manner of living. Consider the following 'law', passed on by the 'great' Muhammad on behalf of the moon deity Hub'Al:


Beyond the usual Koranic absurdity, we have 3 main themes in Sura 4.

1) Christians: Not believing in Islam means you believe in Satan.

2) Christians: You must believe only in Muhammad as well as 'Allah' to be saved, or you go to Hell. [In other words forget the Trinity].

3) Jihad is mandatory against the Trinity-worshipping, hence pagan, Christians.


1. Christians: Not believing in Islam means you believe in Satan


Musulmans view Christians as pagans who worship 3 Gods – the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.  In this vein, Christ is not divine, he is not the Son of the Father, but merely an inferior prophet, who could perform some magic (no miracles are ascribed to Muhammad), who did not rise from the dead, and who predicted the coming of Muhammad, a superior prophet to himself and the last of the word-givers of God (or in the case of Muhammadanism, Al Lah, the Lord of Mecca, which was Baal not the Christian God).



Worship Allah and join none with Him in worship, and do good to parents, kinsfolk, orphans, Al-Masakin (the poor), the neighbour who is near of kin, the neighbour who is a stranger, the companion by your side, the wayfarer (you meet), and those (slaves) whom your right hands possess. Verily, Allah does not like such as are proud and boastful;


Christians cannot believe in the Trinity. That is polytheism under Koranic law. Punishable by death.



Verily, Allah forgives not that partners should be set up with him in worship, but He forgives except that (anything else) to whom He pleases, and whoever sets up partners with Allah in worship, he has indeed invented a tremendous sin.



Look, how they [Jews and Christians] invent a lie against Allah, and enough is that as a manifest sin.

[the above phrase references the Trinity]



And (also) those who spend of their substance to be seen of men, and believe not in Allah and the Last Day [they are the friends of Shaitan (Satan)], and whoever takes Shaitan (Satan) as an intimate; then what a dreadful intimate he has!



Surely! Those who disbelieved in Our Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) We shall burn them in Fire. As often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for other skins that they may taste the punishment. Truly, Allah is Ever Most Powerful, All Wise.



Have you seen those (hyprocrites) (Christians, Jews, Non-Muslims) who claim that they believe in that which has been sent down to you, and that which was sent down before you, and they wish to go for judgement (in their disputes) to the Taghut (false judges, etc.) while they have been ordered to reject them. But Shaitan (Satan) wishes to lead them far astray.


Christians are of course criminal hypocrites, joined to Satan and they have rejected the proof of Muhammad’s prophethood, his divine insights and the power of the Al-Lah.  Worse they have set Christ up above the Al-Lah to be venerated and followed.


2. Christians: You must believe only in Muhammad as well as 'Allah' to be saved, or you go to Hell.


Christians and Jews very loudly rejected Muhammad (along with most of the pagan Arab tribes).  Muhammad received a ‘revelation’ that such disobedience would be rewarded with punishment and hell. 



And whosoever disobeys Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad SAW), and transgresses His limits, He will cast him into the Fire, to abide therein; and he shall have a disgraceful torment.



On that day those who disbelieved and disobeyed the Messenger (Muhammad SAW) will wish that they were buried in the earth, but they will never be able to hide a single fact from Allah.


Christians were given the ‘scripture’ which in Muhammadan theology came from the Al-Lah and was perfected in voice and words by Muhammad.  Christ and his disciple broke ‘Sabbath rules’, by for instance, healing people on a Saturday or eating with ‘unclean’ hands.  This is anathema to the cult of Muhammad.  The Muhammadan book Recital is the final word of Al-Lah, it supersedes and nullifies the Christian scripture and demonises those who break the rules of the Sabbath. 



O you who have been given the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Believe in what We have revealed (to Muhammad SAW) confirming what is (already) with you, before We efface faces (by making them like the back of necks; without nose, mouth, eyes, etc.) and turn them hindwards, or curse them as We cursed the Sabbath breakers. And the Commandment of Allah is always executed.


Given their stubborn sinfulness and rejection of Muhammad, Christians are 'cursed', and destined by the Al-Lah, for Hellfire.  The Christian scripture is only a ‘part’ of the revelation of Al-Lah and not the most important part.  It is superseded by Muhammad’s commands.



Have you not seen those who were given a portion of the Scripture? They believe in Jibt and Taghut and say to the disbelievers that they are better guided as regards the way than the believers (Muslims).


They are those whom Allah has cursed, and he whom Allah curses, you will not find for him (any) helper,



Of them were (some) who believed in him (Muhammad SAW), and of them were (some) who averted their faces from him (Muhammad SAW); and enough is Hell for burning (them).



They (hypocrites) are those of whom Allah knows what is in their hearts; so turn aside from them (do not punish them) but admonish them, and speak to them an effective word (i.e. to believe in Allah, worship Him, obey Him, and be afraid of Him) to reach their innerselves.


[see also 59, 61-62, 64-68]


What the above means as a teleological liturgy is Jihad. The objective of Koranic theology is to conquer the world for Muhammad. Once Jews and Christians are demonized, associated with Satan, and declared to be a dangerous force, it is far easier to kill them.


3) Jihad against Christians is mandatory.



O you who believe! Take your precautions, and either go forth (on an expedition) in parties, or go forth all together.



But if a bounty (victory and booty) comes to you from Allah, he would surely say - as if there had never been ties of affection between you and him - "Oh! I wish I had been with them; then I would have achieved a great success (a good share of booty)."


Let those (believers) who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter fight in the Cause of Allah, and whoso fights in the Cause of Allah, and is killed or gets victory, We shall bestow on him a great reward.


Christians are regarded in the Koran as 'oppressing' the Moslems, and Arab-Moslem freedom can only be realized when these Christians are overthrown by military force.  This is an oft-stated claim of Muhammadans and their many apologists.  The Musulmans are oppressed and they must fight Christians who are allied with Satan, until Allah-Muhammad is victorious and kill them, even if they hide in strong fortresses:



And what is wrong with you that you fight not in the Cause of Allah, and for those weak, illtreated and oppressed among men, women, and children, whose cry is: "Our Lord! Rescue us from this town whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from You one who will protect, and raise for us from You one who will help."


Those who believe, fight in the Cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve, fight in the cause of Taghut (Satan, etc.). So fight you against the friends of Shaitan (Satan); Ever feeble indeed is the plot of Shaitan (Satan).


Have you not seen those who were told to hold back their hands (from fighting) and perform As-Salat (IqamatasSalat), and give Zakat, but when the fighting was ordained for them, behold! a section of them fear men as they fear Allah or even more. They say: "Our Lord! Why have you ordained for us fighting? Would that you had granted us respite for a short period?" Say: "Short is the enjoyment of this world. The Hereafter is (far) better for him who fears Allah, and you shall not be dealt with unjustly even equal to the Fatila (a scalish thread in the long slit of a datestone).


"Wheresoever you may be, death will overtake you even if you are in fortresses built up strong and high!" And if some good reaches them, they say, "This is from Allah," but if some evil befalls them, they say, "This is from you (O Muhammad SAW)." Say: "All things are from Allah,"so what is wrong with these people that they fail to understand any word?


Muhammad will lead the Jihad, guided and sanctified by Baal (the moon deity of Mecca) or Al-Lah:


Then fight (O Muhammad SAW) in the Cause of Allah, you are not tasked (held responsible) except for yourself, and incite the believers (to fight along with you), it may be that Allah will restrain the evil might of the disbelievers. And Allah is Stronger in Might and Stronger in punishing.


The death of Christians results not just from enacting the Jihad. If Jews or Christians convince a Moslem to leave the cult of Muhammad, kill the apostate [and those who did the converting to the polytheistic criminality]. Or, if Jews and Christians embrace Islam and then leave, kill them as well:



They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected (Faith), and thus that you all become equal (like one another). So take not Auliya' (protectors or friends) from them, till they emigrate in the Way of Allah (to Muhammad SAW). But if they turn back (from Islam), take (hold) of them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither Auliya' (protectors or friends) nor helpers from them.


The first part of Sura 4 outlines why Christians [and non-Moslems in general] are inferior; why they will go to hell; and why Moslems must perform Jihad against non-Moslems. Further, apostates or anyone rejecting the Allah-Muhammad cult must be killed. This is not one single phrase in the first part of Sura 4, about immanent and universal ethical and moral principles, natural law rights, human dignity, tolerance, gratitude or the Golden Rule. Cults are not religions and Islam is most certainly a Bronze-Iron-age inspired cult.

Henri Pirenne: Mohammed and Charlemagne

Intellectual Life did not descend into 'darkness' post 476, but developed and flourished.

Bookmark and Share


 First part here.

Second here.


For anti-Christian, anti-reality bigots, the world ended on a dark day in 476 A.D. when the pagan, slave-owning, militaristic despotism steeped in blood and bondage called the Western Roman Empire ‘fell’ to Germanic ‘Barbarians’, barely clothed, toothless, fouling themselves, champing and chimping like African apes over the great ‘classical world’ of the Romans.  Nothing was left, all was ruin, and darkness reigned. This standard-Atheist-Humanist view is the complete opposite of reality in many ways.  The contraction in Western European society occurred with the Musulman invasions of the 7th and 8th centuries.  Not only is this common-sense, but empirically and archaeologically proven.  But it runs counter to the Atheist-Humanist love of Muhammadanism, in which rainbows vie with unicorns who tussle with magical pots of gold for attention and relevancy. 


The deranged violence, war, slavery and destruction of the Musulman Jihad, obvious and present in the modern world as well as the medieval, is ascribed to be the fault of Christians, lascivious monks and illiterate Catholic peasants, too stupid to invent the thousand of items which propelled Catholic Europe to world-wide domination by the 15th century.  The Jihad was to their benefit the Atheist-Humanists chant, it brought civilisation, they intone.  The intellectual barrenness of the modern age can be summed up in the non-existent criticism of the Muhammadan cult and the fantastical illiteracy about its cultural-civilisational destruction, which is now resurrected as the opposite, proving the general uselessness of education and university systems in the modern world.


Pirenne devotes many pages outlining the intellectual life of 6th century post-Roman Western Europe.  Not much had changed from the 4th century, except improvement and greater erudition.  ‘Intellectual’ life did not descend into darkness, writing, poetry, art all flourished post 476 A.D.  The Germanic states which took over the Western empire, did not change anything and invested in cultural refinements including schools and libraries.  Monasteries were busy with scribing and copying, and the urban populations educated their children in the same manner as before the ‘fall’. 


“We learn through him (Pasiphae a rhetorician) that the schools of rhetoric in Rome were as busy as ever.  He wrote his panegyric of Theodoric between 504 and 508, in the inflated and pretentious style as that which marks his biography of Anthony, the monk of Lerins.  He also wrote of grammar, of rhetoric which ‘commands the universe’ and of the bases of the Christian’s education.”


Education, literacy and artistic output in many genres only accelerated post Rome 476.  Pirenne lists a few examples:


Boethius, a Roman Christian born in 480, made a consul in 510, be become a minister in the Ostrogothic government and reformed the monetary system.  He translated Aristotle, Isagogue the Porphyry, and various works of Greek musicians and mathematicians.  He wrote the important work which influenced medieval thought, ‘Consolation of Philosophy’, merging Stoic and Christian ideals.  He was executed for treason, plotting with the Byzantines who tried, and succeeded for a time, in reconquering Italy.


Cassiodorus was born in 477, and was the principal minister in the Ostrogothic government.  He withdrew to the religious life in 540 and established a monastery.  He set his monks the task of compiling all the ancient works of classic antiquity.  The medieval compilation of literally tonnes of pagan books and their translation, restoration and cataloguing can be traced to this era.


Pirenne mentions many different Romano-Christian actors in the realm of writing, poetry and education; including Fortunatus, Arator, Caribert, Duke Lupus, Andarchius, Gogo, Barthenius, Dracontius, Felicianus, Florentinus, Felix, Luxorius, Mavortius, Coronatus, Calbulus, Parthenius, Fulgentius, Sidonius and King Chilperic, amongst many others.  As Pirenne concludes:  “In short the invasions did not modify the character of the intellectual life in the basin of the Mediterranean….the old tradition survived.  Since there were still writers, there must still have been a public to read them, and even a comparatively scholarly public….This intellectual life which preserved the traditions of antiquity must have continued into the 7th century, since Pope Gregory the Great reproached Didier, Bishop of Vienne, with giving all his time to grammar, and in Spain there were historians of some merit up to the time of the Arab conquest.”


In the 7th century Christian scholars continued the ‘old traditions’ building libraries, encyclopaedias and manifests of technologies, inventions and tools.  Isidore of Seville is one example, “…..tried to make the science of the ages accessible to his contemporaries.  Not a trace of the classic spirit survived in his writings.  They related facts, and contained useful recipes.  He was the Encyclopaedia of the Middle Ages.”


In the 6th and 7th centuries Western Romano-Christian civilisation was engaged in endless building projects.  Churches, water systems, canals, windmills, watermills and road building were common.  Many of the structures were aesthetically adorned with new advances in sculpture and art.  The pagan world was being merged in the Christian and medieval world.  A dynamism developed, longer terms of trade, credit, and cultural confidence, must of it influenced by the great Christian city and empire of Constantinople, the largest urban complex in the world and a hive of manufacturing and technological output. 


The world did not crash into darkness in 476 A.D.  Quite the opposite.  The fetters of Roman pagan militarism were lifted, the crushing weight of a corrupt state pushed away, and the Christian ethos of freedom enshrined.  Light not darkness flowed post Rome. 



Henri Pirenne: Mohammed and Charlemagne. Rome never 'Fell'. It was replaced.

No 'Dark Ages' until the Musulman invasions.

Bookmark and Share



First part here.


The ‘Enlightenment’ darkened history.  One aspect of the violence done to Europe’s past, its culture and heritage, is the lie, repeated everywhere, ad-nauseum, based on men wearing wigs who did no primary research and who viewed themselves as the insufferably highest of ‘evolved’ beings; is that ‘Rome fell’.  It crashed on a dark day in 476 A.D.  A resounding clap and storm of thunder and disagreement from the civilisation Gods redounded across Western Europe as rain and hail fell.  Immediately a dark veil of superstition, ignorance and palaeolithic beliefs was pulled across Europe, expressed by the Catholic Church, a target of hate and opprobrium for the Enlighteners, who in their ignorance and bigotry failed to recognise that their own rather easy lives were built on the civilisation created by the Church and Christianity.  In this historical revisionism, Rome collapsed in 476, and the Continent pulled by the dead weight of the anti-rational Church, fell into an abyss.  Nothing remotely like this occurred. But truth was never the objective of the endarkening religion of ‘rationalism’, itself irrationally proposing extreme opposites from reality. 


The Roman empire carried on after 476, and very little was altered, until the time of the Muhammadan invasions and destruction of the Mediterranean Christian civilisation starting in 637 AD.  The unified Christian cultural achievement centred around the Mare Nostrum was not shattered by the German takeover of the Western part of the Roman empire.  It was sundered by the Muslim Jihad which separated Syria, North Africa, Spain, southern France (until the mid-9th century) and parts of Italy and the Western Mediterranean isles, from Christian Byzantium and the world’s largest city, manufacturing entrepot and port, Constantinople.  Trade, culture, money, paper and consumer goods were deranged, the ports shrank, the merchant fleets were abandoned, the massive increase in White slavery (with links to the Vikings), Jihad, piracy, raids, and slaughter of Christians along European coasts, reduced the once urbanised areas of Western Europe to penury and ruin.  Europe turned from the Mediterranean to the north, and went from a trading empire, to a land-based empire, assaulted on three fronts by the Musulmans, the Vikings and the Avars/Huns from the early 8th century to the 10th centuries. 


Before the Muslim Jihad the Western European economy was still Mediterranean-centric, prosperous and along the coasts and trade routes, urbanised.  No collapse can be discerned and the evidence in Visigothic Spain and elsewhere, points to a profoundly rich civilisation.  Sutton Hoo in England, at the fringes of the former Roman state, has revealed an enormously rich 6th century Saxon burial chamber indicating a society with extreme surplus of income and wealth, and trade routes stretching into Asia.  This site is 100 years after the ‘fall of Rome’ and puts a lie to the myth of an age of darkness and ignorance.


Pirenne relates how the absolutism of the Roman Empire and its wealth, once transmogrified into German-dominated states, found expression in the new merger of Church and State, in which secular powers used the Church, its organisation, literacy, influence and prestige, to administer, admonish and acquire societal order and control.


“Nothing could be less Germanic than the royalty of these military leaders.  It was simply personal power; exactly what we find in the Empire.


In all these Kingdoms the absolutism of the king is explained by his financial power.  Everywhere, as the successor of the Emperor, he disposed of the fisc and the taxes.  Now the wealth of the fisc was enormous.  It included the Imperial domain, the forests, the waste lands, the mines, the ports, and the highways, and there were also the taxes and the mint.  Thus the king was a landed proprietor of enormous wealth, and he also possessed a formidable treasury of minted gold.  No prince in the West, before the 13th century, can have been so rich in money as these kings.  The description of their treasuries calls up the image of a river of gold.  Above all, this wealth enabled the king to pay his functionaries…..the retention of the Roman impost and the market-toll were the essential sources of their power….”


The above describes a wealthy, energetic, urban, trading society.  Schools, literacy, poets, writers and artists were legion.  Pagan classics were still copied and learnt.  Iconography and religious art were created and appreciated.  Windmills, watermills, pumps, textiles, medicines and monasteries were built, manufactured, founded and expanded.  The lengthening lines of commerce illustrate a large sub-stratum of literate professionals, engaged in contracts, pricing, transactions, credit, interest bearing loans and detailed record keeping.  This was no backwater, isolated, enclosed and autarchic civilisation. 


Cities existed and expanded.  Bathing never disappeared given that the aqueducts, infrastructure, plumbing and movement of water was not destroyed in the urban areas.  Trade in spices, oil (for lamps, replaced by wax candles post the Musulman invasions), paper, jewels, manufactured consumer goods from the East, food, wine and other products not available locally accelerated until the Musulman closing of sea traffic which started with the conquest of Spain in 720 A.D.  The Western Mediterranean was severed from Byzantium and the reduction in trade and interchange was profound and obvious by the time of Charlemagne’s rule circa 770 A.D.


Like so much ‘common knowledge’ in the ‘age of science’ the idea that Rome ‘fell’ is a myth which serves a purpose.  It was proposed by those who hated the Church and Christianity.  It is promoted today by the same like-minded bigots who wish to devalue their own culture and heritage and who wish the destruction of the Church. 


Henri Pirenne: Mohammed and Charlemagne

An opus to be read and thoroughly understood

Bookmark and Share


Pirenne was a well-known expert on medieval history before the first World War. Whilst interned in a German prisoner of war camp he started and completed several completed books.  Mohammed and Charlemagne describe the impact on Western Europe from the Mohammedan incursions and Jihad starting in the 640s in North Africa and in particular, the eradication of trade, coin, materials and urban life which was pronounced by the mid 8th century.  Hence the atheist appellation ‘Dark Ages’.  But like the modern, well-paid philosopher-‘scientist’ they don’t tell you why Europe may have been darker than it would have been, if allowed its normal development and trajectory.  ‘Dark Ages’ as a term has no historical validity, and the dislocation caused by the Muslim Jihad is barely admitted.


‘Romania’ before the Germans

Rome did not ‘fall’ in 476 A.D.  This is anti-history.  As Pirenne depicts, the Roman empire had long been managed by Germans and various tribes.  476 was simply a more formal deposition to recognise the reality of German power within the empire, an ascendancy of fact dating from 410 A.D.  Rome was a Mediterranean empire.  The Germans were not of the Mediterranean.  Post 476, very little changed.


“…the most striking, and also the most essential, was its Mediterranean character.  Although in the East it was Greek, and in the West, Latin, its Mediterranean character gave it a unity which impressed itself upon the provinces as a whole.  The inland sea, in the full sense of the term Mare nostrum, was the vehicle of ideas, and religious, and merchandise… one travelled away from it civilisation became more rarefied.  The last great city of the North was Lyons.”


Rome was a consumer city.  Constantinople in the 5th century AD  was the world’s largest city and a manufacturing centre and a maritime, trading entrepot.  Rome was not.  The Orient or East was far more active, urban and richer than the West.  Rome and the West of the empire utterly depended on Constantinople for trade, specie and goods production.  A similar relationship exists today in many areas where China and eastern lands ship manufactured products of all sizes and varieties to de-industrialising, de-manufacturing, Western states.


The Syrians and the Jews controlled the maritime traffic moving from East to West and back again.  Jews and Syrians were found all over Western lands, in some citieds like Marseilles constituting a majority along its harbour area.   They brought papyrus, spices, ivory, wines, silk, fabrics, art and manufactured product to the West.  The entire Roman empire used the gold solidus, a common legal framework and Christian ethos and religiousity dominated the culture and minds of the population.


The German tribes starting in the 4th century entered the Roman empire and accepted all they encountered.  They converted to Christianity, become Romanised, learnt Latin and supported existing Roman institutions.  They added nothing.  Before the 5th century most of the Roman army was already fully Germanised under the guise of the word ‘Roman’.  The Vandals, Goths, Suevians and others achieved notoriety as skilled soldiers and generals.


The Huns and other Asiatic tribes ‘pushed’ large groups of Germans into the Roman empire starting in the 4th century.  Entire peoples migrated across Roman frontiers along the Danube or Rhine.  The upheavals in both Roman East and West were many, but the salient point made by Pirenne is that by 439, after defeating the Romans twice, the Visigoths were masters of much of Gaul and at the same time the Vandals took the important and food producing province of Africa.  It was the Vandal takeover of Africa which presaged the complete collapse of the old Roman order.


With the Vandal subjugation of Africa, Rome was largely without food.  Its army could not be resupplied, its million population now at risk of starvation.  In 441 the Romans attacked the Vandals in North Africa but were defeated.  The richest parts of the empire were now German including Carthage the second largest Mediterranean port after Constantinople, Byzacium and Numidia.  


At the same time the Huns ravaged and murdered in a great swathe along the plains from Thrace to Gaul.  By 451 Attila and the Huns were laying waste to the Roman civilisation along the Loire valley.  The Roman general Aetius, with his Burgundian, Visigothic, and Frankish allies soundly defeated Attila in 453 near Troyes.  The Vandals in 455, after the murder of the Roman emperor refused to recognise his successor and sacked Rome.  The Visigoths also proclaimed themselves independent from Rome in Gaul.  The depositions of Romulus as Roman emperor in 476 was a formality, not a crash or a fall.  The German tribes in various regions took over the Roman empire, its structure, institutions and civilisation.


And this is Pirenne’s important thesis.  Nothing changed post 476.  The empire under new masters continued along as before.  Trade was still robust, the solidus and specie still used and minted, the East-West flow of materials unaltered, the African production of food and its dissemination still essential and continuing, the use of papyrus for writing and administration flowing from Egypt into the Roman urban areas undiminished in flow and quantity.  The ports were still full, the urban economies still operated under Roman law and Christian influence, the art, textiles and manufactured items used in daily life, still produced and consumed.  No shuddering crash, no thunderous implosion, the sun still rose in the East and set in the West.  The Roman empire never crashed – until the Muslim Jihad arrived in 637 A.D. and destroyed the unity, coherence and cultural singularity of the Roman Christian Mediterranean-based empire.


20 years after 9-11. What have we learned?

Some people have woken up. But the elite are as ignorant and treachorous as ever.

Bookmark and Share



This follows on from a blog 10 years ago, on 9-11 which asked ‘what did we learn 10 years after that fateful declaration of war on ‘liberal’ democratic societies’, which thanks to the Corona fascism are now illiberal, undemocratic and probably not as free as some areas under Taliban control.  Twenty years after 9-11, the USA is run by a despotic Communist dictatorship, in the persona of a man who has been stupid and criminally corrupt his whole life.  Who would have thought that 20 years post 9-11, the Muslims or ‘terrorists’ would have seen the US morph into a totalitarian repression?


20 years on and what exactly have we remembered and learned from the unprovoked Muslim attack, coordinated by Al Qaeda or the base, and which heralded a 20 year war in Afghanistan and Iraq ?


According to the Muslimified Prime Minister of Canada, the real concern is the impact 9-11 had on Muslims.  He starkly and darkly chides Canadians for Islamophobia, or wrong think.  His Immigration Minister – a female Muslim who criminally lied on her refugee status and reason to emigrate to Canada which should have resulted in her deportation– calls the Taliban ‘brothers’.  Muslims who dominate many national legislatures evoke the same philosophies and biases.  These two expressions of solidarity with the ‘minority Muslim’ are hardly novel, and they are in fact for most Western governments and those useless creatures called politicians and civil servants, standard beliefs and policies. 


20 years after 9-11 and the Muslim diaspora has accelerated.  15 million or more entered the EU and UK from 2011-2021.  In the UK alone some 400.000 Muslims arrive every year to settle.  The large northern English cities of Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and Bradford are in many locales, Muslim dominated.  Imams openly preach that they the Muslim umma, will conquer north England.  They can add Londonistan to the list.  East London is largely Muslim and Indian.  It is about as English as Lahore.  From London the Muslim diaspora, arriving in waves every year, spreads itself out to the hinterland.  There is not one English community of any size, within a 2-hour drive of London, that does not have a noticeable Muslim presence.  And more illegal Muslims and Africans arrive on the coasts of Sussex and Kent, eagerly welcomed as ‘refugees’ by the media, the Church and the anti-English self-loathing racists who deplore Christians and Whites.  50.000 will make landfall this year and bring over 200.000 of their families and friends, since not one has been deported during the tenure of the Corona King Boris and his Hindu-Ugandan born Home Secretary responsible for such matters.


The UK is not unique in its love of Muslim immigrants.  TV adverts the world over depict Blacks and Muslims as the superiors of the hated Whites, hair flowing, white teeth, athletic, or studious and severe behind eye glasses whilst discovering something in a lab, or programming some code into their iMac, with their White girlfriend close to hand.  The EU has allowed more than 10 million Muslims to enter unvetted since 2011 with hundreds of Jihad attacks ranging from the enormous to the small.  Notre Dame was no accident.  Now millions from Afghanistan will enter the EU, to be dispersed to the provinces of Greater Germany, with governments demanding that the ‘racist, phobic’ locals, do their utmost to welcome in the ‘refugees’ who will enrich them by not working, committing rapes and crime and calling for Sharia barbarism.  90% of Muslim immigrants are unemployed in Sweden.  The same numbers can be found all over Europe.  If the Muslims don’t physically conquer Europe, they will certainly bankrupt it.


20 years after 9-11 and what have we learned?


The media still won’t discuss the real ‘root cause’ of 9-11.  Islam has 1400 years of barbaric war with ‘bloody borders’ and its keystone document is more Christophobic than Judeophobic.  Western civilisation and certainly what is left of the liberal-doddering Churches is the enemy and always has been.  Devout Moslems truly believe that the Babylonian moon deity Hub'Allah, or the Al-Lah, has chosen them to rule the earth in his or its name, through the 'great man' Muhammad, the most important law-giver in human history. At times fictional insanity cannot match factual reality.


20 years later on and what have we learned?

According to the media and most academics it is just 'Islamists' were are fighting, as if one group of backwards vicious Moslems got the whole idea of Muhammad's enterprise wrong. Sometimes the Islamists are called militants, terrorists, or disaffected youth. They are never connected to Moslem theology. 10.000 dead a year world-wide from Moslem attacks and over 40.000 attacks since 9-11, and yet the big brains cannot connect Islam with Moslems with violent death-loving Jihad.


20 years later on and what have we learned?

Few know that the cult of Muhammad is both racist and supremacist.  The Koran calls for the eradication of Jews, Christians and non-Muslims.  Not many know this. Blacks are regarded as inferior and to be enslaved, unless they convert to the moon cult.  Today in Africa Muslims own an estimated 5 million Black slaves, but no one is asking them to bend knees at sport matches.  In Nigeria Muslims slaughter 5.000 Christians a year.  No one is asking them to bend knees to Christians and ask forgiveness.  The cult of Muhammad is just another expression of totalitarianism, but few know this.  It is portrayed by Western fake news and hacks as a minority, under duress and repressed.  There are more Muslims in the world now than Catholics. 


20 years later on and what have we learned?

The poverty of Arab and Moslem states is blamed on the West, 'capitalism' [which is non-existent in its pure form], trade and globalisation. The Jews in tiny Israel, surrounded by 300 million hostile Moslems are singled out as the 'root cause' of massive Moslem terror, jihad and societal poverty. Arabs squatting in former Jewish territory [see 980 BC] are now called Palestinians and survive on both international welfare and Jewish aid. Their stated goal is another holocaust. Hamas and Hizbollah are feted as freedom-fighting organizations, deeply devoted to harmony and multi-culturalism.


20 years later on and what have we learned?

As with the Rona Fascism, we have learned that people will believe anything if told by ‘experts’ and the Fake News.  20 years later on and it seems we have not learned that much about Islam, the Koran, the history of Muhammad, the imperialist spread of jihadic Muhammadanism, the 300 million dead over 1400 years, and the 10.000 killed annually in the new century by oil-funded Moslem depredation. Moslems in Turkey and elsewhere openly proclaim the intention of a new Caliphate. Moslems in India brag about wiping out the Hindus – after raping and converting their women. Jews are targeted for another holocaust. Iran readies a nuclear weapon. 5th column groups are busy in the US and Europe, usually with taxpayer money, in devising various means to bring down their host governments. There has not been one single Moslem demonstration anywhere in the Western world, ever, against Moslem racism, supremacism, Jew-hate, female mutilation, dis-honor killings, jihad attacks, and intolerance. Not one. And that includes the days following 9-11.


20 years later on and what have we learned?

In our culture, in our cities, in our immigration systems, in our schools, in our politics - not a hell of a lot.