Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.
10 million whites were enslaved by Moslems. Black slavery is still practised in the wonderful moon cult of Mecca's conquered and plundered territories in Africa and parts of Asia. Some 25 million Blacks – some estimates are at 200 million - have disappeared in the peaceful, tolerant, nirvana of Muhammadist society. Slavery is sanctioned in Mein Koran, with Moslems owning non Moslems with their 'right hand'. Sex slavery of Infidels by Moslems abounds in Western states, with girls as young as 8 years old being traded and sold for sex in places like the UK. No worries, Moslems are always relabelled in the UK and other states as 'Asian' or 'disaffected youth'.
The media – those pious practitioners of truth – and the politicians – those earnest beacons of love and light; along with the 'quackademics' – those practitioners of 'science' and enlightenment – would never utter a word against their favorite fascism. But the average person is now becoming aware of the extent of Moslem rapacity, the Moslem cult's addiction to sex slavery, its hatred of the Infidel, its blood lust to exterminate all who do not raise buttocks in the air to Baal-Muhammad, the moon deity and Fuehrer of a pagan bronze-age inspired cult.
An academic who is not a quack and who has produced illuminating work on the massive extent of Moslem slavery – sexual as well as skin based – is Robert Davis of Ohio University. One of his books is reviewed here 'Christian Slaves, Moslem Masters'.
'The jihadic aspect of the slave trade is quite apparent in the brutality of the Muslim incursions along the European coasts. Whole towns, regions and coastal areas were denuded. Much of littoral Italy was left seriously under- or even de-populated as people moved to the highlands and into walled cities. Raids taking whole villages and thousands of slaves at one time were almost annual events. The Muslim raiders also used terror along the coasts, destroying shrines, churches, monasteries and any imagery or structures that had a religious importance. Booty, gold, art and any worthwhile artifact which might help pay for the expedition was also taken. [p. 41]
The Muslim obsession with White slavery was also fuelled by the need to have slaves man their galleys.'
Davis estimates that 2-3 million whites were taken as slaves by Moslems just in North Africa and Ottoman Turkey alone, between 1500-1780. If we add in pre-1500, and include Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Europe, then calculate in the modern era, the sex slaving of white women by Moslems; than the total of white slaves taken by Moslems is at least 10 million over 1400 years. The culling of Blacks is significantly greater, but that won't stop American Blacks converting to Islam, like their hero the racist Muhammad Ali who belonged, to the Nation of Islam, a racist – Black Moslem group whose objective is to turn America into a Black Caliphate and eliminate all whites.
His new book focuses on the enslavement within North Africa and the Ottoman 'empire' [Moslems squatting on other people's land]; as a case of Infidelophobia, or the culling of non Moslems as sex slaves, galley slaves, or labor for mines. This means of course that Islam is peace and love and what about Dances with Wolves and the American treatment of Indians ?
Of course one should never expect a quackademic, or politician, or one of the many 'experts' wearing bags over their heads to comment on Moslem enslavement of non-Moslems, or Muhammadism's racism and supremacism; nor on Black Moslem racism against whites. Doing so means you are not a 'scientist' and are intolerant.
The Crusades were one of the most important events in our history – and one of the most glorious. They saved civilisation. There is little doubt about this. Islam or Mohammedanism as it should be called [or the cult of Mohammed], is a militant barbarous paganism. Why wouldn't you fight it?
In the great wide world of Western 'intelligentsia' and popular-culture, the Crusades to the Holy Land are portrayed as the expressions of a 'Dark Age' society, full of Christ-loving rabble, malcontents, thieves, morons, and hair-shirt wearing tonsured hypocrites. Only an illiterate, barbarous society would launch attacks against the lands of Christ and engage in the violent racial extermination of peaceful, non-White and entirely sophisticated and nuanced Moslems. Or so we are told. The reality is of course the opposite. The Crusades from 1099 to roughly 1291, were actions which saved Europe and civilisation. There can be little serious doubt about that. The Moslems brought the idea of intolerant Holy War or Jihad, into the heart of Europe enslaving and killing literally millions of people in Italy, Spain, Southern France conquering even the southern cantons of Switzerland in their lust for booty, women, land and power.
Cleansing the spiritual and material world in the name of the thing Allah, meant the fusing of church and state and the development of a robust intolerance and program of racist-supremacism which was already firmly embedded in Islamic theology. Europe was richer, more educated and more sophisticated in all matters of the political-economy when the Moslems attacked it in the early 8th century. We know this from Arab sources and from the obvious fact that marauders don't plunder poverty stricken areas. Vikings plundered England for its wealth. Moslems pillaged Europe for its treasures, its women and its civilisation.
When true barbarians – the Moslems –attack what should you do? Turn the other cheek? Sell your possessions and imitate St. Francis? Hide? Organize an international conference and create 'legal' statutes of international approval for either self-defense or projected-warring? Or do you simply get on with the business of defending yourself, training your military, fortifying your towns, educating your populace about the need to fight back; and making war on the enemy, 'until they have had enough' to quote Churchill? Only a demented self-loathing personality would accept any but the last option. Yet many in our society will reject the obvious – even those Christians who if they knew any history whatsoever, should know better.
“However, history bears me out. Not a single significant voice was raised against the Byzantines when they fought Islamic conquests. There are no records of Christian pacifists in Egypt or Syria urging a Gandhi-style non-violent response to the advances of Muslim armies. The new, pre-emptive dhimmitude being urged on us by certain clerics is not the fruit of Christian orthodoxy but contemporary liberalism, which acts as a kind of civilizational AIDS, finding excuses to undermine and render impossible every healthy measure of self-defense. Just as a retro-virus infiltrates and corrupts the existing DNA of human cells, so liberalism twists the tenets of Christian humanism, the Western insistence on tolerance and equality, our decent instinct of respect for other's cultures and beliefs, and turns them into toxic heresies by negating the countervailing values that made these values viable.”
Christianity is not by its theological nature naturally pacific. Neither is it defeatist.
The Crusades in the end did fail of course. There was never enough money, unity, leadership skill, men or to use the in-vogue Marxism, 'neo colonial' purpose, to make them permanent. Their eventual failure makes the claim of 'colonialism' a lie. There were no population transfers from Europe to the East. Most Crusaders left immediately after their tour of duty was over. Few Europeans even considered leaving the relatively prosperity of 'Dark Age' Europe [a myth] to settle in a dusty, barren, hot place beset by Moslems. Of the 7 main Crusades outlined by most historians [though there were really 3 phases to the 'First' Crusade]; only 2 were military victories. The first under the Knights of France; and the Third 100 years later under Richard the Lionheart [portrayed by Hollywood in yet another pathetically bad movie 'Robin Hood', starring Russell Crowe, as a raving mad dog who did nothing else other than murder innocent Muslims and bankrupt his state].
This is factual nonsense to anyone who has studied the Crusades. Also an idiocy is the idea that Richard's foe Saladin – a man Richard defeated in battle many times, never losing – was a Victorian gentleman. Saladin like any Muslim medieval leader murdered and butchered his way to power, annihilated cities and villages, killed the innocent and killed prisoners. The only reason he did not eradicate the inhabitants of Jerusalem in 1188 when he took the city, was because the Christians remaining in the city send an envoy to Saladin and plainly stated that all the Muslims remaining in Jerusalem would be killed unless Saladin guaranteed the Christians and Jews their freedom through ransom. The deal was made – and so was a lot of money for Saladin. Many thousands who could not be ransomed were shackled into slavery to work on Moslem projects including fortification building and agriculture. So much for the Hollywood myth that this man was the idealized saint. He was brutal self-interested murdering narcissist as any real history will show.
In any event the charges against the Crusades, perpetuated by the media and the base stupidity that is pop-culture, maintains that they were assaults by illiterate idiots, hungry, dirty and thirsting for land and gold is the precise opposite of what occurred. The Crusades were ruinously expensive, largely French and family-based in the supply of leaders and men, drawn almost exclusively from the elite with some exceptions; and extremely pious in their objective that the Holy Land was Christian land, and that the Moslem slaughter of Christians, pilgrims and the destruction of Christian holy places had to be avenged. Add to this the virulent Moslem destruction of Spain, the Moslem occupation of once Christian territory in Sicily and Spain; and the endless slave trading of Christians including their alliance with the Vikings in this regard; and the pillaging of the European littoral by Muslims, and the only surprise is the fact that it took 400 years for France and Catholic Europe to organize themselves and meet this threat.
The Crusades could only have emanated from a rich, confident and realistic culture, one which understood the existential threat posed by Mohammedanism and once which had first defeated the Moslem attempt to take all of Europe in 732 and 737 AD in France. The Christian King Charles Martel, victor against the Moslem infidel was as much of a true Crusader as Richard, Bohemond, or Phillip Augustus.
We should give thanks that these men existed. Men whose type cannot be found in today's Western world.
The insanity of Mein Koran:
More Infidelophobia from Mein Koran.
It is well known that the smaller Suras, compiled during the early phase of Muhammad's cult, were culled and plagiarized from the Kabaa shrine. These verses are later re-assembled and infused with the usual litany of Koranic-Muhammadan intolerance towards non-Moslems. It is worthwhile to note two obvious facts. First, Muhammad's attempt at gang organization in Mecca, disguised as social 'reform' and concern for the 'poor', was a remarkable failure. He was deemed to be a social agitator, hungry for power, illiterate, quite stupid and probably insane. The Meccan elite had little patience for a man who was condemning Arab pagan theology, and distorting if not obstructing trade and money which flowed to the Meccan shrines from pilgrims and the pagan faithful. Instead of killing him for generating social turbulence the Meccans exiled him to Yathrib or Medina. A fateful mistake of course.
Second, Muhammad's lack of education, erudition and even innovative ideas is reflected by his plagiarism of both pagan Arab poems and ideas; and of Judeo-Christian tenets which he had picked up as a simple caravan trader in Syria. Nothing Muhammad said or uttered was new or ethical. Most saw through his thin veneer of 'social concern' to discern a brigand, a thug and a political-military adventurer, one who would lead armies, butcher men with his own hands, slaughter Jews, Christians and pagans, and engage in lurid sex trafficking and the establishment of a personal harem – all the while bathing in stolen gold and luxuries, and taxes for his Meccan cult centred around Hub'Al, the Lord, or the Al-Lah.
The moon idol, Al-Lah did not create the Koran. Muhammad and later generations of Arabs and Moslems did, each with a self-interested purpose. The Hadiths for example were largely compiled by the Abbasids during a civil war in the 9th century, some 200 years after the founder of Submission had been murdered by his own men.
Of particular import to Moslem and Arab culture is the random violence against non-cult members. The Koran is a merger of pagan Arab mores with Muhammad's intolerance. In the last 21 smaller verses of the cult document, there are 388 verses. Only 109 verses or 28%preach hate speech against the Infidel. Only a cult document would contain such lurid hatred against Unbelievers.
If you read these smaller poems and Suras you will notice some obvious themes, which are reflected throughout Mein Koran. It is thus a lie to say that the early Meccan verses are 'peaceful' and the later Medina verses violent. The violence and stupidity of Muhammad's cult runs in torrents from start to finish, and is refracted and redounded throughout his fascistic leadership and life:
Infidels are evil, greedy, stupid, ignorant and linked with Satan. They can be killed. Many verses above reference individuals that Muhammad murdered, justifying their deaths by the tautological claim that they were Unbelievers, or that they mocked or criticized Muhammad.
Muhammad must be obeyed since the Al-Lah idol has designated Muhammad to be the most important human ever. Not to follow in-toto, Muhammad's diktat is a 'sin' perpetrated by 'criminals'.
Al-Lah is the only free-will force in the entire universe. Humans only have the 'free will' to follow what he wants them to follow.
All Infidels including those importunate enough even to question Al-Lah [aka Muhammad] will be tortured in Hell-fire on Judgement Day.
Islam is superior to any other cult, religion or social organization [Sura 9-102:6, you keep your 'religion' and don't taint Islam with your dogma].
These themes are that of a cult, not a religion. Perhaps Moslems might first want to read the Koran to associate themselves with the pagan-fascist [communalism which eradicates the individual, rationality and free-will], cult of a man who was most likely quite insane.
More Infidelophobia from Mein Koran. Cleaving Asunder – the heads from Infidel bodies as they cascade down to hellfire, condemned by Al Lah, the Meccan moon god and Muhammad's family idol:
Sura 82 adds nothing to mankind's collective intelligence. No metaphysics make an appearance. Depressing, violent and stupid, with the same repetitive theology: submit, prostrate, punish the Infidel, and obey Mohammed [or Allah since both are the same].
“O man! What has seduced you from your Lord Most Beneficent? Him Who created you. Fashioned you in due proportion, and gave you a just bias; In whatever form he wills, He puts you together. Nay! But you do reject Right and Judgment!” [82:6-9]
Mein Koran is clear that there is no free-will. This is the opposite of Catholicism. Without free-will there is no civilization. Nothing. Not having free-will denies freedom, free speech, and makes work, effort, innovation, and suffering to achieve goals, utterly pointless. The El-Lah, or Al-Lah moon deity is the only 'thing' or dialectical force which commands and uses 'will'.
The Allah thing determines all, and manages every single action in the universe, including your Judgement day. All Infidels and non-Muslims will be punished, because the Al-Lah deity has denied you the 'wisdom' to embrace Islam and has instead prepared a 'grievous penalty'. The wicked are of course Jews, Christians and pagans who refuse to embrace and submit to Moslem fascism:
“And what will explain to you what the Day of Judgement is? Again what will explain to you what the Day of Judgement is? (It will be) the Day when no soul shall have power (to do) anything for another: for the Command, that Day, will be (wholly) with Allah.” [82:16-19]
“And the wicked – they will be in the Hell, Which they will enter on the Day of Judgment, And they will not be able to keep away therefrom.” [82:14-15]
The Infidel non Moslem ape and pig will know that this recompense is justified because they are Fujjar disbelievers who are by default, sinners, wicked and criminal. Such people are only fit for Hell-fire. So spaketh der Fuehrer Muhammad.
During the past 3 yeas, in 'moderate', 'civilized' central Nigeria, an increasingly Moslem-political stronghold; over 1600 Christians have been killed or wounded; 21.000 displaced, 1200 churches destroyed; and entire farming areas laid waste. and smashed and not a single lamebrain MSM mention was uttered. If there were press coverings on this barbarism, they would replace Moslem with 'rebels', or 'extremists' and Christians with 'tribes', or 'sectarian groups'.
'In the period January 2013–May 2016, 826 Christians were killed and 878 injured. There were 102 churches destroyed or damaged. Beside these, 787 houses were destroyed, as well as nine shops, and 32 motorised vehicles. Many families were completely deprived of their livelihoods. Around 21,000 Christians were reported as Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) in different camps inside and outside Nasarawa. Due to the difficult security situation, the authors of the in-depth fact-finding report are convinced that they were only able to report part of what really happened.'
This is of course Moslem cleansing of Christians. It is abetted and funded by the Nigerian governments in the region. Moslems hold political power in a tenuous balance between Moslem and Christian parties and interests. The government is actively marginalizing and killing off Christians, beholden to Moslem poly-cratic theology. This is not new. When Moslems buy the political system the eradication of non Moslems swiftly follows.
'The targeting of Christians appears to be carried out by the Hausa-Fulani herdsmen and by deliberate government policies to marginalise Christians and Christian communities. This is evident in political power-sharing and domination through traditional rulership. Islamic identity tends to give Muslims undue advantage over the affairs of the state.'
According to Western pea-brains, Islamophobia is the big concern. Moslems erasing Christians and Christianity are simply reactions to Christian intolerance, Christian hate and Christian ignorance. So believeth the brain dead.
In Pakistan, 50 Christians who were enslaved by Moslems were rescued and taken out of slavery. This will never be discussed in the MSM lame brain media, nor by politicians or 'experts who know'
‘Fifty Christians in Pakistan were enslaved by Muslims, being forced to remain imprisoned making bricks. Within these very brick kilns, Christians have been forced to endure all sorts of inhumanities and atrocities, such as rape and other sadistic tortures. While this violation of human rights goes on, our organization, Rescue Christians, has been working on the ground to liberate these slaves from their bondage and torment.
These fifty Christians were finally rescued by our organization, Rescue Christians. We were determined to save these victims but due to security issues and the government connections of the kiln owner it took us over a year to execute any plan to save these people. The plan was finally executed last week. Our team bought the slaves out, and after their liberation they were driven safely away by truck. During the journey, some of the Christians began to sing Psalm 24 ( in Punjabi language), crying out’
Moslems enslaving, killing, raping and eradicating Christians and Christianity through their dedicated hatred and Christianophobia, never make the news. With the MSM and politicians, the Meccan moon cult is godly, religious, just and superior. When reality intercedes and declares the opposite and reveals the fascistic immorality that is the Meccan-Muhammadan cult, that reality is simply ignored.
Muhammad's contemporaries were quite convinced of his madness. The entire cult of Islam and the entire history of Muhammad's military-political career make it apparent that he was indeed quite mad. What 'balanced' mind engages in murder, endless war, brigandage, 'revelations' from his family's idol, sex slavery, concubinage, and bizarre posturing and rituals?
Sura 81, or 'The Folding Up' [of reason, logic and ethics one assumes] is a defence of Muhammad's sanity. This is telling. Muhammad was long thought by his contemporaries to be insane, and
“...you will discover that the prophet's "ministry" in Mecca was filled with troubling episodes. Following his first Qur'anic revelation, Muhammad claimed to have been demon possessed. By his own admission, he tried to commit suicide. Those who knew him best, his family and neighbors, said that he had gone mad. "He is a demon-possessed sorcerer fabricating scripture," they said, accusing him of plagiarism and of having purely selfish motives. They mocked his prophetic claims, ridiculed his Qur'an, and said that his preposterous notion of turning many pagan idols into the one God was insane. As a result of this verbal abuse, all chronicled in the Qur'an, Muhammad pledged to slaughter his kin.”
Muhammad 'pledged' to wipe out the Meccans for mocking his ministry of fantasy, gibberish and confused revelatory liturgy. No miracles or supernatural events can be attributed to the mad brigand as well. Why would anyone follow someone who knew little, yet spouted so much inanity ?
The only recourse for Muhammad was war. When he crowned himself Prince of Mecca in 630 AD at the head of a 10.000 man army, he had waged 8 years of war and plunder from his base in Medina. Mein Koran during these 8 years undergoes a radical transformation, from confused pleadings to follow Baal, to strident hate and demands to eviscerate non Moslems. The totalitarian nature of his poli-theocratic program is evinced in his endless quest to form slaves out of the Arabs – slaves to himself, his interests and represented by Islam or submission to his family's idol Hub'Al, or 'the one'. The Koran is from a 'god' not from Satan.....
And it (the Qur'an) is not the word of the outcast Shaitan (Satan).
Then where are you going?
Verily, this (the Qur'an) is no less than a Reminder to (all) the 'Alamin (mankind and jinns).
To whomsoever among you who wills to walk straight,
And you will not, unless (it be) that Allah wills, the Lord of the 'Alamin (mankind, jinns and all that exists).
Your only duty as a worthless human is to obey this Allah thing and follow Muhammad. Such a creed finds its expression in over 10% of the Koran, in which slavery is demanded and expected. This is typical of cults whose ethos emanate from the Bronze and early Iron age. Islam is by definition and depiction a very old cult indeed – at least in its demands and organization. It is not a religion and certainly not a cult that has any productive or moral part to play in the modern world.
The frowning Muhammad. Mein Koran and the development of the Muhammadan cult make it clear that Muhammad, had no interest in the preachings and teachings of non-Moslems. Only he possessed the divine answer, embedded in the Koran and the sanction of his alter-ego personality the Al-Lah idol, or male moon deity [the Lord] of Mecca. An infidel interrupting and importuning Muhammad is simply not to be countenanced. Hence the name of this chapter:
The corroded, infected and sinful Infidel, dared to approach the busy Muhammad while he was preaching. A frowning event indeed. Muhammad and his cult followers have nothing to learn from Infidels. The opposite of course does not apply. The Infidel rejecting the 'admonition' and 'profit' brought to the world by the 'prophet' of Submission, will be damned.
If the Infidel for example dares to frown, full of pride and disbelieving criminality, at the teachings of Muhammad they will be sentenced on the Day of Judgement. In the Koran, which seems rather obsessed with the end of time, Judgement Day is the penultimate assignment of rewards and punishments. The pious Muslim, not the good, the moral, the gracious, the dignified, the Golden-Rule practising Muslim [none of these attributes exist in the Koran], but simply the pious, prostrated, irrational believer of the Allah cult will be rewarded.
Muhammad's 'prophecy' is that all Infidels will be 'covered in 'Blackness'. They will also be punished, humiliated, and tortured for eternity. Isn't this Infidelophobia?
Out of 40 verses in this Sura only 10 preach hate speech against the Infidel.
The Kafarah, the Fajarah, means the wicked criminals and reference Infidels. The disbelieving man is simply cursed [80:17]. His doom inevitable. There is no linkage here of paradise with a set of ethical and religious commandments. The injunction is far simpler and sinister. Obey Muhammad, and the Koran, fear Allah, and then perhaps you might be saved on Judgement Day. If you resist Islam you are damned. Such a theme informs a poli-theocratic cult, not a religion.
'Those who tear out' references the ripping out of infidel souls by pious and superior Muslim angels on the day of judgement. It could also support the Moslem supremacist belief that they should rip apart and tear out the hearts of the hated Infidel in this life. In Moslem liturgy the ripping out of the Infidel soul is a sordid and foul practice; a punishment befitting those who did not follow Muhammad [aka Al Lah, or the Lord of Mecca].
“By the (angels) who tear out (the souls of the wicked) with violence:” [79:1]
“And Hell-Fire shall be placed in full view for (all) to see, - Then, for such as had transgressed all bounds, ..The abode will be Hell-Fire.” [79:36-38]
In the Moslem fascisctocracy, to transgress 'bounds' is to reject Muhammad, Mein Koran, or any of the 'laws' set out by the Fuehrer. This Sura reiterates Moslem intolerance of the Infidel Jew and Christian and demands their destruction. It is a clarion call to Infidelophobia.
This Sura again uses the story of Ramses II and Moses. Apparently Moses, some 2000-2200 years before the Muhammad cult, was an apostle of the Lord of Mecca. Ramses II defied the Hebrew God Yahweh, which is now conflated in fevered Moslem lying, with Baal or Al Lah. Ramses lost his son, his slaves, most of his army, and his country suffered greatly for his arrogance and rejection of Yahweh, or in the Moslem fairy tale, Baal.
In this vein, since the hated Infidels reject Muhamamed they must be punished, tormented, killed and consigned to Hell-fire. Out of 46 verses in this Sura, only 20 are hate speech verses. The hate speech or Infidelophobia includes:
Rather clear. The Unbeliever [criminal, transgressor, polytheist which includes all Christians] is going to Hellfire. The key to the Sura is the story of Moses and 79:26 'Verily, in this is an instructive admonition for whosoever fears Allah'. Fear the Al-Lah deity and Meccan moon idol. Don't try to understand him – only Al-Lah has free-will and knowledge, you don't. Don't deny the supremacy of the Koran, supposedly his or its creation. Don't reject Muhammad, his chosen human mouth piece. Simply shut up, follow the Koranic programme, obey Muhammad and fear the wrath of Al-Lah. If not you are doomed:
That nicely sums up the Koran's Infidelophobia. Reject any aspect of the Moslem cult and its Fuehrer, and you are doomed in this life and the next.
This Sura, which was written as Muslim power was growing in Medina during the 620s AD, is a warning to Arab Jews, Christians, and pagans, that Islam will never tolerate anyone who is not a moon-cult member:
“Verily, We have warned you of a Penalty near, - the Day when man will see (the Deeds) which his hands have sent forth, and the Unbeliever will say, 'Woe onto me! Would that I were (mere) dust!'” [78:40]
The day of the penalty for all non-Muslims will be when the moon idol Al-lah, 'assembles' all of the worthless humans [created from sperm and meaningless material, see Suras 76 and 77]; and pronounces his judgement. How rational. Of course the Allah thing is the only 'creature' which can talk. Never talk to, or with, the Allah. Never dare to argue or question him or it, or whatever it is. No free-will and no rationality is tolerated within Islam. None. The crime for even thinking of querying the Allah object is Hellfire and torture.
“(Allah) Most Gracious: none shall have power to argue with Him. The Day that the Spirit and the angels will stand forth in ranks, none shall speak except any who is permitted by (Allah) Most Gracious, and he will say that is right.” 
Shut up and obey. If you are pious you will receive the benefices of heaven including 'full breasted maidens' [78:33]. Obviously heaven is a male Moslem refuge. The earnest female Moslem is not rewarded and as Muhammad said 99% of Hell's inhabitants are female. If however, you reject the cult of Muhammad you are to be destroyed. Out of 40 verses in this chapter, only 11 preach hate speech. They are:
Christians and non Moslems are doomed to drinking boiling water and licking pus and 'dirty discharges' [78:25] from their wounds for eternity. Islam is named Submission for a good reason. You simply submit your worthless self to Muhammad's cult document named 'Recital' and if the Al-Lah thing is pleased enough with your piety to Koranic theology, he might reward you if you are a male. Or he might not. Only the moon idol knows, because only the moon idol has free-will.
Moslems fear Allah. They fear his hatred, wrath and bloody vengeance. They don't want to be like Jews and Christians in hell, drinking molten metal and tortured for eternity. To say that the Allah-thing is the opposite of the Christian ideal of God is just to state the obvious. The Allah idol comes directly out of the Sumerian-Babylonian Bronze Age polytheistic cults. These were both animistic and celestial, brutal, unforgiving, capricious, opaque and disinterested in humanistic ideals and mores. These 'gods' were enormously powerful dialectical forces, unknowable to humans, and full of hate and blood, not love and charity.
In Sura 77 or 'Those sent Forth' [to conquer the world for Muhammad], only half of the verses are hate-speech against the Infidel pig and criminal. Western PhDs and 'experts' declare that this is proof Islam is peace and harmony.
Those who oppose Islam, Muhammad, the Koran, or any aspect of the cult of Al-Lah [the Lord], will be destroyed. There is no mis-translation, 'nuance', or hidden message of abiding love and toleration. With Islam it is all or nothing. Either you are in the cult of Muhammad or, you are dead. There is no halfway house of earnest debate, understanding and odes of theology, desirous to convert your soul and heart. Within the context of such a world-view, there is no need to preach to non-Moslems, to reason with them, to use peaceful means to convert them to the Islamic point of view. Charity, tolerance and the golden rule do not exist, nor are they necessary within Moslem liturgy and eschatology.
The cult of Muhammad long ago dispensed with reason, ethics and tolerating non Moslems, believing instead that the 'obvious truth' of Baal, and of Moslem superiority is so clearly in evidence in the world, that merely to question any premise of the cult, should invite punishment. People who deny the 'truth' cannot be tolerated since they put the cult in-toto and its supremacist theology, at risk. The Infidel and those why deny Muhammad's 'message' must simply be erased from existence:
Woe indeed to all those who oppose the cult of Muhammad. The last sentence is repeated 10 times, in this Sura of 50 verses. At least the authors of the Koran were direct and clear in their writing. They want Moslems to abandon free-will and rational responsibility and mores; and simply follow the cult of Muhammad.
'Time, time, time, see what has become of me.....' Growing old, leaves are brown, the sky is a hazy shade of winter....Unless you live in Islam. Time within Muhammad's cult does not exist. There is no winter of your life, just mindless obedience to Muhammadan diktat. The world's only important human died in 632 AD. His handbook of hate set down for all time the mode of living for all humans. No improvements, no interpretations, no debate is allowed. Mein Koran is the 'uncreated' work of Baal, handed to Muhammad, who was tasked to distributing bronze-age ideals to the witless [in the Moslem view, criminal, polytheist, satanic, corrupt], Jews, Christians and Pagans. Time stands still in the cult of Submission.
So does the hate.
In this Sura of 31 verses, there are only 6 verses of hate speech against the Infidel. Moderately centrist the PC cult would say. The hate speech includes:
Al-Lah, or Baal, has willed that the Jews and Christians be blasphemous Zalimun, doomed to punishment in this life and the next. It is a bizarre instantiation of pre-destination. It certainly highlights your lack of free-will which does not exist in Islam, in any form.
Jews, Christians and Pagans will be destroyed because they rejected the prophecy of Muhammad and his Qur'an, supposedly the uncreated work of a divine force, represented by the male moon deity of Mecca Al-Lah. The Koran is simple. Moslems who support the Muhammadan cult by fighting, 'striving', giving alms to poor Moslems, and helping the Moslem community while being piously prostrated to Al-Lah, win. The rest of humanity is doomed. This seems to be a very strange definition of a 'religion'. Intolerance, irrationality, slavery, ignorance and no free-will are usually hallmarks of cults.
Moslems rule, the rest are slaves. This is the main theme of Mein Koran oder Recital. The anti-Infidel component of Muhammad's handbook is inter-alia, one of its most revolting themes. Non Moslems in-toto are regularly denounced in the Koran, and degraded. Since the Al-Lah controls 'everything' including the creation of reality every second [Mein Koran claims that the moon deity fashions every second for every person], the human per-force means nothing, represents nothing and is worth nothing. This makes it much easier to kill those who dare not to follow the cult of Muhammad:
“Does man think that We cannot assemble his bones: Nay, We are able to put together in perfect order the very tips of his fingers...He questions 'When is the Day of Resurrection?'....Before your Lord (alone) that Day will be he place of rest. That Day Man will be told (all) that he put forward, and all that he put back. Nay, man will be evidence against himself.” [75:3-14]”
Your own existence is proof of your criminality according to 75:14. Maybe the Moslems should join forces with the cult of Gaia.
The perpetual rage of this Al-Lah idol is boundless. In this Sura of 40 verses only 12 preach hate speech against the Infidel ape and pig. 'Infidelophobia'. On the Day of Judgement, the Islamic moon deity will punish those with the sad faces who know they are doomed, because they rejected Muhammad's cult. The hate speech verses are 24-29, and 31-36. Examples include:
Obligatory duties, meaning rituals and acts of prostration and prayer to the unknowable Al-Lah, or Baal the Lord of Mecca, must be followed. Baal is course equated by Muhammad with himself. It is difficult to see where Baal ends and Muhammad begins in Mein Koran. The important dictum is that anyone who does not follow Muhammad is doomed, 'admiring himself' too much, full of pride, ignorant of his impending doom, but concerned, gloomy and frightened when confronted by the Day of Judgement. On that date he will receive his just punishment and his 'woe' for rejecting the 'truth' of Muhammad's 'warning'.
Again, no ethical statements, nothing about free-will, gratitude, immanent tolerance or the Golden Rule and certainly no expressions about the necessity of rationality and intelligence. Just blind obedience. Those who are this Al-Lah's slaves are rewarded. Those who reject Muhammad's totalitarianism are crushed in torment.
Atheistic Nazism and Atheistic Communism also made the same demands and had similar expectations and results as Mein Koran.
Only 33 out of 56 verses in Sura 74, are hate speech against non-Moslems. This obviously proves Islam is peace and love. Pope Frank or Stupidus I would approve of this chapter no doubt. To disagree with the import of this Sura, and not to accept Moslem supremacism, is to be a racist. The magnificent 19 for instance of 9-11 fame, were men who obviously had nothing to do with Islam. Witness the following, 74-31:
19 angels will guard the Fires of Hell, reserved for Jews and Christians who deny Muhammad. Moslem groups in their zeal to kill Infidels, often-times hunt, plan and perpetrate in packs of 19. The Christian and Jewish 'criminals' 'in whose hearts is a disease', will be burnt and will be used as a 'warning' to the 'remainder' of mankind. How charitable. Surely in today's cultural Marxist PC Fascist world, these utterances actually mean that Moslems deeply love and embrace their non-Moslem 'brothers'?
Sura 74 mentions the iLah of Mecca or Hub'Al, which was of course the male moon diety of the Kabaa shrine and its chief Lord or ilah; guarded and mainained by Muhammad's family. How convenient.
“'What symbol does Allah intend by this?'....Nay, verily by the Moon, and by the Night as it retreats, And by the Dawn as it shines forth, - This is but one of the mighty (portents), A warning to mankind, -”[74:31-36]
Allah shows his power through the moon, simply because he is the moon deity. This is what the above verse means. Moon worship was common throughout the Near East, with the moon heralding cooler temperatures, the morning dew, and at certain times of the year, perhaps rain or celestial recharge. In all Near Eastern cults the moon deity would be yoked to the sun deity. In the case of Hub'Al, Allat was his consort, though some scholars argue that Hub'Al is the feminine and Allat the masculine. It matters not. What is important is the pagan-celestial theme of Islamic belief.
Allah is the worship of idols, named 'Henotheism' which Muhammad transformed into monotheism, a theology he stole from more prosperous and cultivated Jews and Christians. Yet few comment on this.
Arab paganism enshrined both human slavery, and slavish devotion to idols including the restriction of human free-will, in the face of unlimited will to power of the idol in question. A good Moslem is nothing but a good slave of the Allah-thing, which in the mind and intent of Muhammad, is akin to himself.
Slavery is a major theme in Islamic liturgy. This identifies Islam as the opposite of a religion. Cults suppress individuality. Witness the absurdity of these verses:
If you reject Allah you are a wild ass. Dumb, dirty, unclean, worthless. Better to be a slave of Allah, and to follow everything he demands:
Pious believers in Muhammad's cult win temporal and heavenly delights. Everyone else is a criminal destined for hell. What is the implication of this nonsense ? You must unwittingly follow whatever the cult of Muhammad and Allah says you should follow. This denies rationality, free-will and even ethics, since over 1/3 of the Koran is supremacist, violent, racist and misogynist.
The hatred of Allah, Arabs and Moslems, for others cannot be explained away by PC fascism. Cult hatred never can be rationalized. The problem in today's world, is that too many people demand that Islam is a religion. It is not. Any cursory reading of Islamic liturgy and theology makes that obvious.
Every Moslem must fight in Baal's [The Al Lah or Lord of Mecca] and his cause:
Pray and fight for Muhammad or Baal, to spread Islam. That is the cause of Islam. Jihad to spread Muhammadism or Allah-ism. Is there anywhere, within Mein Koran, the Hadith, or Islam, a discussion about: free will, rationality, humanism, the Golden Rule, the law of immanent tolerance, or gratitude? Of course not. Just 73:20 repeated in different ways some 1500 times within Mein Koran. No tolerance is expressed by any of the Moslem foundation documents for the Unbelieve. Moslems must fight them in Allah's Cause after all. Logically why would there be the Golden rule or immanent toleration ?
Moslems believe that Mein Koran is the uncreated word of the Lord of Mecca. In this vein, the adjuration to kill Infidels and fight in his cause, is a legal and mandatory obligation. The Sura 'Folded Garments' is yet another demand that the Koran be 'handled' with 'loving care' and venerated as the last theological 'word' in history, commanded by the Meccan moon deity, conflated with 'God' in the feverish minds of Moslems and Islamophiles alike. So when you read that you must fight the Infidel and wipe them out, what then do you expect Moslems to do ?
In this Sura out of 20 verses, only 10 preach hate speech against the Infidel ape and pig. How moderate. The hate speech verses are lurid and include:
Moslem supremacism. So now Muhammad is equated with Moses yet again, the man who led the Exodus out of Egypt. Ramses then pursued the Hebrews shortly after, attempting to re-enslave them. In Koranic fairy tales, Ramses was humbled by the Meccan moon deity, Baal. The important point is 73:19 which says that this story is an 'admonition', in other words, any state, empire, emperor, King, or Liege Lord, who does not become a Moslem believer, will be destroyed like Ramses. Hence Muhammad's call that 'Rum' or Eastern Rome would fall, and Suleiman II's boast, that St. Peter's in Rome would be the stable of Moslem cavalry.
Sadly, there is not one single word in this chapter which is 'nice' to Infidels. Why should there be? A document steeped in will to power and violence has no need nor interest in the Unbeliever – except in his utter destruction and eternal torture.