Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.
Christian persecution comprises 340 million or more Christians under attack around the world for their faith. It is the largest persecuted group on the planet. Thousands are killed every year for their faith and many thousands of Church buildings are attacked, burnt, defaced or assaulted in some manner. In Nigeria alone, every year, Muslims murder some 5.000 Christians, rape countless women and attack, in many cases burning down, over 80 churches. That is just one country. The fake media deem this to be a ‘tribal conflict’ with the Muslim Fulani tribesmen described as ‘militants’ who by accident target Christians and their churches. This is just one country. The Philippines has seen Muslim violence against Christians since the 16th century and it shows no sign of abating. Quite the opposite. But not many know this either.
Muslims in the Philippines
The Philippines is comprised of over 7,000 islands, making governance a challenge. The Filipino people hail from hundreds of different tribes, each with unique languages, customs, and religions. The peoples are divided and collectively known as Christians, Muslims, or Lumads (indigenous tribes with their own religions).
Historical records show that Islam entered the lower islands during the 13th century. These areas were self-governed as sultanates, with Islamic ideals and indigenous statecraft being well established.(1) Spain, seeking riches in the wealthy epicentre of the southeast spice trade, took control of the islands as a colony in the 16th century. They took not only governmental control but also religious control. They converted the population to Roman Catholicism, as they had in Latin America. However, the sultanates were well established with wealth and weaponry and fiercely opposed the Spanish military forces for the entirety of the Spanish colonization period of 300 years.
When the United States acquired the country from Spain in 1898 under the Treaty of Paris. The sultanates opposed were included in the treaty as they viewed themselves as autonomous governments. Fighting ensued. In 1913, the U.S. succeeded in bringing Mindanao and Sulu in as part of the American-Philippine colony. The American government created a homestead policy that encouraged northern Christian land tenants and sharecroppers to move south to Mindanao. This, they hoped, would solve two problems: 1) make the southern country more diverse and 2) curb the communist insurgency that the poverty of the north was fuelling. The policy failed because the Muslim southerners reacted with violence against both the government and their Christian neighbours. It also failed to halt the communist insurgency.
Disgruntled Muslim residents formed the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF). In the 1960s, they rebelled against the American government. The fighting continued after the end of American colonization. Thousands of Christians were displaced and murdered in the rebellion. Like many rebellions, the MNLF sought equality. They cited grievances of inequality between Muslims and Christians, with Christians being favoured. They wanted more access and control over economic development and resources on the island and the return of lands from those moving from the north.
When innocent lives are taken, it is the government’s job to protect the people. President Marcos met the rebels with a heavy-handed military response. This inadvertently strengthened the MNLF’s membership numbers and resolve. The pervasive belief of both politicians and scholars was that the Muslim rebels only wished to reclaim their autonomy and ancestral lands. With these, they thought, the violence would end.
In 1976, Libya intervened, and the Tripoli Agreement between the Philippine Government and the MNLF was established. It gave political autonomy to four provinces of the southern region. However, these new governments were weak. Many Muslim rebels did not agree with the terms of the new agreement. They rejected the original MNLF and created factions. The newly established Moro Islamic Liberation Front and the MNLF Reformists began to target their former members. For the first time, the violence was not only against non-Muslim residents and the government but now included Muslim-on-Muslim violence. Again, the Tripoli Agreement failed to meet its objectives, and the violence continued.
In 1986, seeing that the Tripoli Agreement was not enough to end the violence, the country adopted a new Constitution recognizing the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao. The four included provinces established weak and ill-founded governments which were no match for the violence. In 1992 and 1996, new agreements under President Ramos were reached to establish zones of peace and development. It allowed MNLF fighters to join the Philippine Army and police or receive provisions for socio-economic, cultural, and educational assistance. The national government helped to establish a functioning government with a legislative assembly and administration to oversee the provinces. It allowed for Sharia law and representation in the national government. Muslim schools were established in accordance with Islamic tradition. Politicians and scholars hailed this agreement as being a champion of culture and inclusion. Everyone agreed that, finally, the violence would end. Then the long-standing leader of the MNLF attacked the national army after he failed to be re-elected. The fighting resumed once again.
With each subsequent President, new treaties, agreements, and concessions were given to the southern provinces, and still, the violence ensued. In 2014, a “final” peace agreement was reached, which was supposed to end the violence once and for all. As recent events show, violence still rages on the island today, and Christians are often the targets.
The Islamic State entered the Philippines in 2014, and now these Muslim Filipino terrorists are connected to ISIS, ISIL, and the Abu Shayyaf Group. These international terror networks provide funding and training. The Philippines has been called a terrorist breeding ground by the National Security Agency because of the enormous numbers of “home-grown” terrorists it has produced. They attack not only the Philippines but surrounding Southeast Asian countries as well. The government has an ongoing struggle to maintain order against terrorist groups. “The Philippines is not a safe haven of terrorists. We do not breed terrorists. Rather we protect our citizens from them in order for our citizens to live in a peaceful and orderly society,” said armed forces spokesman Colonel Medel Aguilar in a recent interview.”(2)
Filipinos are not the only ones at risk. Anyone visiting the Philippines, including Americans, is at risk for kidnapping, rape, forced conversion, and even death, as seen in the 2000 kidnappings at Dos Palmas. Terrorists seized Marawi city in 2017. The siege took five months for the Philippine army to put down. This one event displaced 400,000 people.(3)
The centuries-long struggle against colonial rule has morphed into terrorism. The initial reasons for resistance are barely recognizable in today’s Mindanao. The struggle is no longer about ancestral lands and cultural identity but as a means for extremists to terrorize peaceful people.
Lisa Navarrette has studied at both Roosevelt and Harvard Universities and is currently pursuing her Doctorate in Law & Policy at Liberty University. She writes for several human rights organizations and hopes her writing will have an impact on securing justice and human rights for all people.
[1] https://www.niu.edu/clas/cseas/_pdf/lesson-plans/topical-overviews/mindanao-peace.pdf
[2] https://www.ucanews.com/news/hundreds-flee-as-philippine-army-fights-communists/99023
[3] https://www.acaps.org/country/philippines/crisis/mindanao-conflict
(Jan Brueghel the Elder, Village with a Windmill)
Today, Priests and Monks are vilified en-masse by the anti-Christian media and tech platforms. Criticism and exaggeration of real and quite criminal child sexual assaults and abuse abound. There is no end of print or investigative reports on the issue. Yet child abuse in public schools has been confirmed to run at 100x the level of that of the Priestly abuse of children. There is no media or platform noise about this because such a fact does not sell copies or act as edible and enticing click bait.
In spite of the modern stigmatisation of monks and priests it is fair to say as many historians have detailed, that the monks saved civilisation. How many ‘secular’ self-proclaimed ‘critical thinkers’ know this? At the very least the obvious reality is that the monks in total, were indispensable to the forward march of Western civilisational development. How many today feel any gratitude for the great works, past and present of the monks and priests? Very few even know about the inheritors of Saint Paul of Thebes and Saint Anthony of Egypt (mid third century A.D), whose asceticism inspired the creation of monasteries, or groups of celibate men seeking the kingdom of Christ and developing the innovations which propelled Western Europe to an apex of achievement.
Cenobitic monasticism, or communal monasticism, was a reaction in part to the solitary existence of hermits, with a commitment to develop a community of faithful, educated and labouring men. Eastern Christian monasticism developed earlier than the Western version, with Saint Benedict in the 6th century establishing 12 small communities of monk at Subiaco about 38 miles from Rome, before creating Monte Cassino, on the road between Rome and Naples around 529 A.D. The famous rule of St. Benedict which informed all later monastic orders, and their behaviour was instituted first at Monte Cassino.
St Benedict’s rule was moderate, common sensical, and structured, providing a template which was reused throughout Europe. Monks were to receive adequate sleep and food, with a material existence not far from that of a typical peasant. Education and work were expected to be undertaken in addition to prayers and religious obligations. All men were treated equally regardless of status or wealth. Monte Cassino itself was a miracle, sacked by pagan Lombards in 589, the Muslims in 884, the French in 1799, the shelling of World War II, it was always rebuilt and improved.
The Benedictine order, from its founding in about 520 A.D, over the 900 years during the medieval era, provided 24 Popes, 200 cardinals, 7,000 archbishops, 15,000 bishops, and 1,500 canonised saints. At its apogee of power, there were 37,000 monasteries. The order attracted some 20 emperors, 10 empresses, forty-seven kings, and fifty queens. The spiritual and humble life of the penitent monk thus enticed many of the elite within Europe.
Many know of the monk’s key role in preserving literature and texts within the monastical scriptoria. Less known, is the practical arts pursued by monks which changed civilisation. Agriculture is one example. The agricultural restoration of Europe from end to end, was a monkish endeavour.
Inter-alia the monastic orders converted unusable land into agriculture, drained marshes and created farms, pumped out water along the coast line using advanced wind mill technology and built dikes, engaged in advanced breeding of cattle and other livestock, replaced the ox with the horse, developed three and four field crop rotation, built an illimitable number of water mills for grinding and various manufacturing processes, brewed beer, discovered distilleries, improved viniculture, invented fish farming, redirected water flows to feed into cities and villages, taught the peasantry about irrigation and soil management, and developed any number of tools and machines for the farm. The entire county of Yorkshire England owes its medieval prosperity to the Cistercian monks (order established in 1098), who utterly transformed the land there and brought a once moribund and devastated area into the monk-inspired extended trade routes and prosperity of the Middle Ages (the Normans slaughtered some 100.000 people in the 1070s and 80s and it took a century or more to recover). This is but one example within the width and breadth of Europe that could be pointed out.
The monks-built watermills which transformed local industry. Waterpower was used for crushing wheat, sieving flour, fulling cloth and tanning. Jean Gimpel, always a great read on medieval history, reports that the 742 Cistercian abbeys throughout Europe, all possessed advanced technology. The same level of technological sophistication within this network would have been prevalent across the various sites. 742 is a dense network of ‘factories’ which is what a medieval monastery became. The increase in farming, industry and trade, naturally attracted villages, and necessitated the building of roads, bridges and social infrastructure. This mass industrialisation was not seen in the ancient, pagan world. This fact is curiously omitted by the deep admirers of ‘classical history’. They seem to believe that they would be the toga-wearing elite, discussing stoicism, when in fact, 90% of the population led rudimentary, poor lives, untouched by mechanised appliances as developed during the medieval era.
Jean Gimpel writes in the ‘The Medieval Machine’ about the heavy pestles, the fullers’ great hammers, the spares, the plugs, the winches, the ropes, and the replacement by mechanisation of expensive horse labour. The shafts spun by wheels, the use of automation to tan and make shoes and clothes, the grinding of grain, the endless usages of the machines to cook, sieve, turn, or wash. It was a symphony of complex technology that is often disregarded by those who worship the ‘classical era’.
The Cistercians and other monkish orders were also famous for their metallurgy. Every monastery had a factory where waterpower drove the creation of complex agricultural implements. Iron ore deposits were used for forge iron tools. Blast furnaces were first developed by Christian monks. For over 400 years, from the 14th to 18th centuries, the Cistercians were the leading iron manufacturers in Europe. They even used the slag from the furnaces as fertiliser for their fields due to the concentration of phosphates. The mining of salt, lead, alum and gypsum were all enhanced and lead by monasteries. This metallurgical skill extended to cutlery, glass works, and metal plating.
The monks experimented with flying, with a monk in the early 1000’s attempting a glider flight which lasted more than 600 feet. A Jesuit priest, Father Lana-Terzi was the first to discuss the geometry and physics of a flying machine in his 1670 book, Prodomo alla Arte Maestra. Clock making was a renowned skill of the monks, including the first clock built in 996 AD or so by the future Pope Sylvester for Madgeburg. In the 1300s a 14th century monk at Glastonbury built a mechanical clock which now sits in the London Science Museum. Richard of Wallingford, an abbot at a Benedictine monastery, built a mechanical tower clock at Saint Albans in the 14th century as well.
The technological innovations of the monks are simply astounding. Yet that is only a part of the story. The monasteries provided hospitals, hospices and inns for travellers, built and sustain local parish churches, gave great quantities of food, aid and money to the poor, built lighthouses to protect sailors, copied enormous quantities of pagan and Christian literature, established schools and constructed the first universities based on a combination of pagan learning, mathematics, rhetoric, natural science, logic and theology. There survive extant copies of school exercises in which students are challenged to understand Cicero, Horace, Juvenal, Persius, Seneca, Terence and others.
The contribution of the monks to civilisation is without parallel or imitation in history. Across every aspect of life, the material, the spiritual, the practical, the intellectual, the monks dominated European civilisation. Saint Benedict is rightly viewed as the ‘Father of Europe’. Without the monks, it is quite likely that civilisation would have failed, and a true Dark Age, imitating that of the ancient Greek Dark Ages, would have emerged.
The ‘dark ages’ as a faux description were once applied to the entire millennium from 500 AD to 1500 AD. The term is used as an attack on the Catholic Church and opprobrium directed at Faith. The ‘dark ages’ separated the ‘rich, classical’ slave based and largely poor-agrarian societies of antiquity with that of the Renaissance, the supposedly recreation of a glorious-pagan past. This vilification has largely been erased and now the ‘dark ages’ comprise perhaps the 5th to 8th centuries which would offend the great advances made in Gaul, Visigothic Spain before the Muslim invasion, or even Anglo-Saxon England. What is dark, is the fact that we have lost much of the material from that era in the form of lost manuscripts, rolls and whole libraries, many burnt by Vikings, Muslims, Magyars and Huns, or simply lost to accidents, fires, or lack of care in storage.
The era from 500-700 AD in Western Europe was indeed brutal and given the paucity of real information, seems rather dark. Will Durant, an agnostic historian, located the blame for a general decline in society not on the Church, which he viewed as the only civilising factor in Western Europe, but on the endless ‘barbarian invasions’, including migrations which dislocated much of post-Roman Europe. The Church was the only institution trying to hold society together.
‘The basic cause of cultural regression’, he writes, ‘was not Christianity but barbarism, not religion but war. The human inundations ruined or impoverished cities, monasteries, libraries, schools, and made impossible the life of the scholar or the scientist. Perhaps the destruction would have been worse if the Church had not maintained some measure of order in a crumbling world.’
It would have been a colossal disaster for civilisation if the Church had not existed and had not arrested the rapid decline with the implosion of the massive Roman state, itself based on slave labour, military power and uber-taxation. Various Germanic tribes had migrated into the Roman empire staring in the 2nd century AD if not before. Hired as mercenaries they began to take over the Roman military and even civil administration long before 476 AD. Alaric the Goth sacked Athens in 390 AD and Rome in 410 AD and toured both cities as a tourist. The end of the empire was clearly in sight no later than the early 5th century. The Germans however, brought nothing of their own to add to the Roman empire. Literature, technology, engineering, legal codes, culture were barren within the Goths who took over Rome. They were attracted solely by the lifestyle and wealth of what Rome could offer. They were nomadic peoples, very pagan, with primitive ideas around cult worship of nature and the variegated objects of creation.
One aspect of Germanic ‘barbarism’ was the legal code. In Rome, there was some attempt at justice, notwithstanding how corrupt and unequal the system would have been, with the rich able to buy their own judgements and the poor being denied justice or even a hearing. For Germanic tribes a person accused of a crime might be subjected to a trial by ordeal with hot water, in which the person must reach into scalding hot water and retrieve a stone. If within 3 days the wounds were scabbing he was declared innocent. Or he might be tossed into a cold river, bound up, and if he floated was declared guilty. These are hardly edifying principles of a legal system.
The task for the Church in the face of the Germanic takeover of Rome was complicated and massive. As Christopher Dawson says, ‘The Church had to undertake the task of introducing the law of the Gospel and the ethics of the Sermon on the Mount among peoples who regarded homicide as the most honourable occupation and vengeance as synonymous with justice.’ In 410 Saint Jerome lamented the loss of Rome to the Goths under Alaric, noting the brutality and uncivilised nature of the sack, and the end of his classical world. To deflect criticism away from the Church which had no role in the slow-moving implosion of the Roman state, Saint Augustine penned the ‘City of God’, showing the stark differences between the vanities of man’s projects and society; and that of God’s. Christianity had nothing to do with the rot of the slave-based empire of the Romans. Endless civil wars, over-taxation, the brutality of existence, the lack of technological progress, cultural and moral degradation, and the inability to manage its own army led to its inevitable demise.
The most significant German tribe was the Franks and the marriage of Clovis to the beautiful and Christian Catholic Clotilda, and his conversion to Catholicism around 496 A.D., was a turning point in history. Within 400 years all the former ‘barbarian’ tribes of Western Europe would be converted. It would take another 300 years to Christianise the Nordic and eastern European states and peoples. An important element in converting tribes was to convert the King and court, given the relationship and dependency of people upon their ruler. On-going guidance and education were often more difficult than the conversion process. Saint Gregory of Tour’s ‘History of the Franks’, and Venerable Bede’s ‘Ecclesiastical History of the English-Speaking People’, make this apparent. Saint Boniface the great Anglo-Saxon evangeliser in Saxon Germany, both converted and established the infrastructure of the Church in Germany in the 740s, a herculean task rarely equalled in any history.
As with all man-made creations, by the end of the 7th century, much rot had set in the Church, including immorality, depravity, and corruption. The poor moral and intellectual condition of the priesthood by the end of the Merovingian period (the era of Boniface) was infamous. It was under the Irish and Anglo-Saxon missionaries that the Continental Church would be reformed during the 8th and 9th centuries. By the mid-8th-century the Papacy in Rome, in the face of an Islamic Jihad, pagan incursions into Italy and the weakening of Byzantium by the Persians and Muslims turned to the Franks for protection. Charles Martel’s colossal defeat of the Muslims at Tours in 732 A.D. saved most of Europe from Muslim domination (regardless of what revisionists now propose). The Church aided the transition of power from the corrupt Merovingians to the Carolingians or the family of Martel. A recrudescence of civilisation shone with the ascension and power of Charlemagne, must of it premised on the reign of his father Pepin. A central figure was the Anglo-Saxon monk from York, Alcuin, who build and created a school system for Charlemagne’s expanding empire, the collection and copying of ancient texts and the push for literacy across society. As art historian Kenneth Clark once wrote, ‘People don’t always realise that only three or four manuscripts of the Latin authors are still in existence: our whole knowledge of ancient literature is due to the collecting and copying that began under Charlemagne, and almost any classical text that survived the eighth century has survived until today’.
One of the most remarkable features of the Medieval period is the salvation of ancient learning, all of it by monks in monasteries, painfully copying by hand onto parchment, ancient artifacts. The Roman education system was thus preserved and improved by the likes of Alcuin. Astronomy, music, arithmetic, geometry, logic, grammar and rhetoric were carefully conserved and elaborated upon. Writing was vastly simplified and innovated with the introduction of the Carolingian script, which used upper and lower cases, along with punctuation. The impact of this should not be under-estimated. The use of Carolingian miniscule as historians call it, was crucial to the development of civilisation.
This Carolingian renaissance in law, culture, art, writing, education, and Church reform, was assaulted by the Muslims, Vikings, Magyars, and Huns in an endless parade of invasions and assaults commencing in the early 8th century. It is a miracle that anything survived of the Catholic-Frankish civilisation. The unfailing and redoubtable strength of the Church, in spiritual, material and military affairs allowed Europe to survive and post the 9th century begin to thrive. This second wave of Barbarism from the Muslims to the Vikings and Avars, threatened to engulf and extinguish Europe. It was only the Church that kept civilisation alive, and in the monasteries, one finds the islands of intellectual life which kept alive learning, education, ancient texts and legal codes.
The end result of Catholic power and greatness can be seen in the rise of Pope Sylvester in 999-1003 AD. Sylvester was a polymath and the most learned man in Europe. He was fluent in maths, astronomy, Latin, Greek, philosophy, music, literature and technological innovation. He was responsible for sundry inventions in theology, science and astronomy. A man who practiced faith and the use of reason. Pope Sylvester is the icon who refutes and condemns the calumny of a dark age.
Jihad is an Arabic word which means ‘to wage war’. It does not mean ‘to strive’ in contemplation on the immaterial and spiritual. It is a physical, material and direct invocation to violence. ‘Jihad’ is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, which means in Arabic to wage war to establish dominance. There are two wars for the pious Muslim, one is against the carnal material self. The most important is against those who oppose the cult of Muhammad. This is a pillar of Muhammadanism, and after veneration of Muhammad and his Al Lah moon or celestial idol, the second most important.
mujāhadah, (Arabic: “striving”), in Sufism, struggle with the carnal self; the word is related to jihad (struggle), which is often understood as “holy war.” The Sufis refer to mujāhadah as al-jihād al-akbar (the greater war) in contrast to al-jihād al-aṣghar (the minor war), which is waged against unbelievers. It is one of the major duties that a Sufi must perform throughout his mystical journey toward union with God.
Mujahedin, or soldiers of the mujahada, are 'warriors of Jihad'. Jihad as 'war' is declaimed by Moslems, including their war mongering founder, to be the 'lesser' Jihad. The 'greater' Jihad is considered as a form of spiritual warfare against the lower self, (nafs). Muhammad supposedly said as he was returning from Jihad, “We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad”. When the usual apologists whine that Jihad means a spiritual struggle, they are only partially correct and ignorant of the totality of its meaning. Jihad is 2 parts – internal and external. The entire Koran and Hadiths are calls to Jihad, most of these are of course obligations to wage war against non-Moslems.
There are about 1600 verses of violence in the Koran which identify and command Muslims to perform external or violent Jihad in one way or another. Demanding Jihad as a 'duty' from Moslem cult members can be found in Koranic verses such as:
1) Fighting is prescribed for you (2:216)
2) Slay them wherever you find them (4:89)
3) Fight the idolaters utterly (9:36)
Jihad and Muslim ‘holy’ war is the '6th pillar' of Islam and is an obligation incumbent upon all Moslems. Bukhari's Hadiths, or commentary on Muhammad's life, make Jihad even more pronounced as a duty. In fact Jihad, or warring against Unbelievers, is deemed to be in the top 2 or 3 duties of a Moslem [see for eg.
Book 1 of Bukhari, here and here]. Bukhari writes:
“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah''; and the Hadith reported by Muslim which finds many echoes in Bukhari,
“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.''
Muhammad's entire 'career' was one of Jihad, plunder, murder, killing, war, sex-slaving and enriching himself. He was murdered by his own men [not a Jewess doctor], tired of 'revelations' from a fat man covered in gold and silver, ensconced with a harem. He fought in some 29 battles and ordered nearly 60 more expeditions of pillage and Jihad. Calling the leader of this Moslem Jihadi cult a 'prophet' is about as intelligent as calling Herr Hitler a spiritual counsellor. Stating that Jihad is some form of spiritual struggle whilst ignoring its real meaning as an obligation to wage war, is simply insufferable ignorance.
“And the importance of these centuries of which I have been writing is not to be found in the external order they created or attempted to create, but in the internal change they brought about in the soul of Western man – a change which can never be entirely undone except by the total negation or destruction of Western man himself.”
Dawson' book is a valuable learning vehicles for anyone interested in the development of Western Civilisation. In fact all of his books are worthwhile to read. His main idea – civilisation does not last when it is unmoored from its roots, or in the case of Europe and North America from its Judeo-Christian-Greco-Romano heritage. This book performs two services by providing proof that; 1) the world of the middle ages was complex, innovative in many ways, brutal surely, but not dark and 2) the development of Christianity fused with Roman-Greco ideals and technology was a long process and one that occurred differently in various parts of Europe but which was absolutely essential to the rise of Europe to world domination. Historians have proven for example that the Roman legacy was strong in southern France, but quickly disappeared in 5th century England, leading England or the Angle-Saxon lands on a far different path of theological-Christian-political-economic development. The complexity and richness of the middle ages [500-1500 AD] which directly led to the Renaissance and our modern world should of interest to anyone who wonders how our society was developed, from where, and by whom.
Dawson's works can also be used to juxtapose Christian development with Islam. One needs to keep in mind that the Moslem invasions of the 7th and 8th centuries, which destroyed Mediterranean trade patterns, raw material sourcing [gold, papyrus, fruit, spices] and which resulted in endless slave-taking, military attacks and the wanton destruction of Christian targets and assets around the Mediterranean; was by the 9th century ossified in comparison to the chaotic and but at times dynamic Christian states of west, central and north-west Europe. Islam was very good at squatting and the Moslem empire which was not unified in any real sense throughout the Mediterranean basin, did bring about [as the Mongols were to do in the 13th century] a vast territory under the control of one culture which occasioned for that area an increase in trade, capital formation and thus prosperity.
Trade patterns were thus changed to benefit the Moslems, with Ummayad Cordoba and the Spanish littoral as prime examples. This forcible redirection of Mediterranean flows in the political-economy is however quite a bit different than saying that the Moselms created the wealth by themselves, or were engaged in 'learning' or inventing all emanating from 'their' theology. Moslems were for the first 4 centuries of their existence minorities in the countries they conquered and everything from hospitals to algebra was already in existence in the occupied territories of the Jews, Greeks, Christians, and Romano-Berbers. Mostly everything in that Islamic world from the 8th to 12th centuries emanated from Jews, Greeks, Christians and Moors who were Christian converts to Islam. A fact rarely mentioned by academics.
Some of Dawson's themes include:
Dynamism:
“The other great world cultures realized their own synthesis between religion and life and then maintained their sacred order unchanged for centuries and millennia. But Western civilization has been the great ferment of change in the world, because the changing of the world became an integral part of its cultural ideal. Centuries before the achievements of modern science and technology Western man had conceived the idea of a magna instauratio of the sciences which would open new ways for human understanding and change the fortunes of the human race.” p. 17
Orientalist Theology:
“Apart from this single exceptional case [Carolingian Empire], there has never been any unitary organization of Western culture apart from that of the Christian Church, which provided an effective principle of social unity. And even in the Middle Ages the religious unity imposed by the Church never constituted a true theocracy of the Oriental type, since it involved a dualism between the spiritual and the temporal powers, which produced an internal tension in Western society and was a fertile source of criticism and change.” p. 19
Urbanization:
“Nor was the medieval city a repetition of anything that had gone before. It was a new creation, unlike the cities of antiquity or those of modern times and differing also, though in a lesser degree, from the types of city which were to be found in the East at the same period.” p. 161
and
“Henri Pirenne wrote: 'The medieval urban economy is worthy of the Gothic architecture with which it is contemporary. It created in every detail, and one might say ex nihilo, a system of social legislation more complete than that of any other period of history, including our own.' It was this integration of corporate organization, economic function and civic freedom which makes the medieval city, as Troeltsch remarks, the most complete embodiment of the social ideas of the Middle Ages, as we see them in their most highly developed form in the writings of St. Thomas and his contemporaries.” p. 171
War, disorder, the Moslems, the Inquisition:
“The fourteenth century was an age of division and strife, the age of the Great Schism, which saw instead of the Crusades the invasion of Europe by the Turks and the devastation of France by England. And at the same time the intellectual resources of Western society which had been so much strengthened by the extension of the university movement no longer assisted the integration of Christian thought but were used negatively and critically to undo the work of the previous century and undermine the intellectual foundations of which the synthesis of the great thinkers of the previous age had been built.” [sounds like our modern age] p. 198
and
“It marked the reappearance [Catharism in southern France in the 13th c.] of an ancient oriental religion as far or farther removed from Christianity than the religion of Islam. Consequently the Papacy used the same methods as it had employed against the Moslems – the method of the Crusade, and of an appeal to Christian princes to use their power in defence of the faith...and finally by a code of repressive legislation which gave birth to the inquisition.” p. 209
The history of the Middle Ages as Dawson relates in such intricate and scholarly detail, are as diverse as the characters and Christians living in Europe during this epoch. It is a complex history with the tension between Church and State always present. Yet the importance of this period which spawned the Renaissance and our own modern world cannot be cheapened or discounted.
“And the importance of these centuries of which I have been writing is not to be found in the external order they created or attempted to create, but in the internal change they brought about in the soul of Western man – a change which can never be entirely undone except by the total negation or destruction of Western man himself.”
A process which is now in full train.
Anti-Catholicism is not only accepted in most institutions in the ‘Western’ world, it is usually assumed. Anti-White racism is not far behind. There is little to dispute this claim in reality. The very institution which created the modern world – the Catholic Church – is routinely defamed and rubbished. The small percentage of pedophile priests who abuse young boys, usually under the moniker ‘sex scandal’, while obviously criminally immoral and egregious is a small fraction of the sexual assaults which occur in the public school system, or public sports systems, in any year. But no one is interested in that. Lurid portrayals of lusty ribald monks, nuns and priests sell more copy. Not much has changed since the 14th century and Gargantua’s impious exaggeration of the Church’s sexual impropriety. No mention is made within the regulated mainstream of the Muslim sex Jihad, the child abuse by ‘Trans’ psychopaths, or the sex slavery within Europe’s ‘districts’ where women are sold as slabs of meat. The modern Sodom and Gomorrah is deemed ‘liberal civilisation’. Its depravity, stupidity and immorality is hardly new and reaches all the way back to the first development of towns and settled existence.
Oddly the most vociferously Cathophobic can be found in the very institutions which were created by Catholics. The Church inter-alia built and developed: universities, charities, international law, science, the maths, legal infrastructure, courts, transport, mechanised agriculture, long-distance trade, international banking, accounting, blast furnaces and industrial revolutions, advanced metallurgy, precursors to modern railroads, mining techniques, architectural revolutions, artistic advancements, libraries, bookbinding and distribution, hospitals, medical innovations, parliaments, assemblies, to name just a few. It is hard to reconcile Cathophobic irrationalism with the modern world.
Western civilisation, now ‘mutating’ into a totalitarianism, was built by the Catholic Church. The legacies of Greece and Rome were saved by the Church and infused into Catholic doctrine, synthesised, categorised, explained and defended by the greatest philosopher in history, St. Thomas Aquinas. Yet in the popular culture, advanced by atheists and ‘enlighteners’, the Church is given no credit for keeping Western Civilisation alive. Without the Church the gradual takeover of Rome by Germanic tribes, would have ended very differently and much to our detriment. The German tribes did not bring or offer anything new, they greedily consumed the legacy of Rome and turned to the Church for the cultivation and management of society.
Recent scholarship is decidedly turning in the favour of Catholics. It is clear that the Inquisition, which handed over to state powers some 3.000 heretics to be burnt, was not nearly as omnipresent or powerful as claimed. By contrast Muslims murder 5.000 Christians a year, just in Nigeria – but few know this. The Galileo affair was not over science but politics, with the Church the largest single supporter of astronomical science in world history, including today’s institutions which fund cosmological investigations. Galileo never offered proof for heliocentricity (offering tides), and was ignorant of the Christian Kepler’s math which provided the logic supporting the theory. The 17th century pagan mystic Bruno was not burnt at the stake for the sake of ‘science’ but because he stated that there were many universes, copies of the world and by extension the divinity of Christ and the authority of the Church were void and irrelevant. Many such myths when analysed implode very quickly.
We do know that Catholic priest Nicholas Steno began modern geological assessments. Father Kirchner is the progenitor of Egyptology. Priest Riccioli was the first person to measure rate of acceleration of a freely falling body (not Galileo). Priest Roger Boscovich designed modern atomic theory. Jesuits so dominated the study of earthquakes that seismology was known as the Jesuit science. We have 35 moon craters named after Jesuit scientists and mathematicians.
We do know that in all areas of life after the Germanic takeover of Rome, there is scarcely a single endeavour in which monks did not play the central role. Monks created networks of model factories for breeding livestock, centres of academe and scholarship, institutions of spiritual improvement and prayer, pharmacies, hospitals, hospices, libraries, roads, bridges, aqueducts, running water, books, optics and eye glasses, and trade. To name just a few areas. The Benedictines formed by St. Benedict in the mid 6th century really are the generators of civilisation. Their impact on the forward progress of man is the most fantastic story rarely told. The other monkish orders were not far behind in their importance and in many areas of Europe, the Cistercians (12th century) were fundament to the transformation and usage of land and soil.
We do know that Francisco de Vitoria, a Catholic professor was the first man to develop international codes of law, in relation to the mistreatment of Ameri-Indians by the Spanish. He speculated and expressed human and natural law rights and the rights of the natives to fair and legal treatment. This is simply following in the general pattern of Western law, a tradition based on Church law. The modern legal system is entirely based on the codes and accumulated and organised legal traditions of the Church which superseded the hodgepodge of local and contradictory legal statutes. Justinian’s codex from the 6th century is the foundation of all Western legal systems. The ‘rights of men’ do not emanate from Locke or Paine, but are found in the far distant past, elevated by St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13th century, but found in Catholic law dating back to Charlemagne.
We do know that modern economics and economic ‘thought’ was purloined from the medieval Scholastics. Concepts around pricing, free markets, regulation, economic distortions, taxation and other issues are found in Church theological implementations in the 14th to 16th centuries. The extended long-distance terms of trade, in existence since 1000 A.D. necessitated advanced ideas about commercial relationships, commercial laws, proper and moral rates of interest, the relationship between money and inflation, the debasement of coinage (which by itself could trigger a revolt) and how to regulate product quality and honesty in manufacture (an example is substituting flour with sawdust). Guilds and associations formed in part to not only protect access to occupations but to protect consumers from fraud and to guarantee quality and end price gouging and extreme profiteering.
There is much that the Cathophobes don’t know about history or civilisation. Their ignorance is not enlightened, nor scientific. Not every Pope, Bishop or Priest was worthy of praise. Not every action by the Church or its components was moral or good. Not every activity was right or just. Many crimes, follies, and desecrations suffuse Catholic history. But in the main, on balance, it saved civilisation many times, including rolling back and demolishing the Muslim Jihad. Today of course the Catholic Church is a far different and quite inferior imitation of its medieval self.
In G.K Chesterton’s biography of St. Thomas Aquinas, which I have just re-read, the claim is made that no philosophical system since the sixteenth century comports itself with what the ordinary person would call ‘common sense’. This is entirely true. Grossly inferior ‘Philosophers’ such as Hobbes, Kant, Hegel, Hume and the ‘moderns’ all premise their ‘scepticism’ on the belief that nothing real exists. They entirely suspend and ignore the reality of the world of the 5 senses. In this vein an egg is not an egg but a chicken, a cat is simply an abstract naming convention for an animal which may or may not exist, and there is no essence to an object and its very being is subject to denial. The cant of Kant et al is infinite in its sophistry and anti-reality. The greatest philosopher in history, greater even than Aristotle, was of course St. Thomas Aquinas, and as Chesterton relates, his vast genius is built upon the solid foundation of reality, logic and common sense. Not so the modern world.
Without the Catholic faith and religion there is no modern world. It is quite as simple as that. The heights of cultural and societal achievement was only conquered by Catholicism. Everything else is either an imitation, forgery, fraud or if positive, built entirely on the edifice of medieval energy and insight. The Catholic faith leads one initially to the truth of God and creation, a God who should be and who is beyond our crude and rough comprehension, limited as we are in both reason and understanding. Alongside God, the Catholic faith requires a belief and affirmation about human reason and the essence of Being. The Catholics preserved the knowledge of classical systems during the Germanic migrations and takeover of the Roman-Greek empire in the West during the 5th and 6th centuries. It was the faith which inspired Charlemagne to create a recrudescence across all of society and dream of a new and much improved Athens. This is the faith that generated modern science, astronomy, mathematics, schooling, universities and sundry inventions from eye-glasses to agriculture and armaments and everything else that built the basis for modernity.
The most remarkable feature ascertained by Chesterton and embedded in the Summa Theologica of St. Thomas Aquinas, is the obvious miracle where Christian revelation manifests an inherent superiority in the natural plane of existence, without neutering, or obstructing reason, and in fact, demands the union of faith and reason. In sum we can say that without faith there is precious little reason, but plenty of obscurantism, paganism, violence and oppression. Without reason, there is no faith, but blind obedience, dogma and ritual. When the two are married as in Catholicism, we have the capability to create, build, discover, invent and know. Our faith is the worthy counsellor, the guard-rail, the brake, the common-sense of our reason.
In the ‘modern’ world, poorly described as such, with its pagan attributes, atavistic impulses, its sacrifices of unborn children, its medical Nazism and disregard for natural immunity, natural law rights and natural freedoms, its drunken screeching about the benefices of totalitarian governance and the usurpation of national cultures; we see the 2000 year old, carefully constructed and beautifully made edifice of Western Civilisation under siege from within and without. Mechanical ‘science’, Benthamite libertinism, the crass and shallow individualism carried to extremes expressed in the ‘rights of men’, the post-modern relativism in which nothing matters or is even really known, are false, repressive, inane idols of pagan practices, hardly more developed in their barren theology than the worship of Baal the storm, fertility or moon God. The modern world denies reality, chromosomes, genders, natural climate processes and objective truth and reality.
What makes the onslaught worse, is that the modern Catholic Church, with a globalist-Pope and corrupt-craven Vatican, is part of the problem. The Church is unwilling to defend itself against the pagan-secularist invasion of our civilisation, it chooses instead to aid its own destruction. Orthodox Catholicism is being expunged at an alarming rate and the infantilisation and Anglicanisation of the Church is being implemented with due haste. The radical negativity of the Church towards its own history and doctrines is barely matched by the secular hatred of the same. The irrational dogmas of the ‘modern age’ divorce faith and reason and indeed, obliterate reason altogether. Freedom of speech, thought, activity and natural law rights to bodily and national autonomy are now the enemies of the globalist-Church hierarchy and its Pope. Pope Leo XIII taught that all laws are divinely premised, as manifested in canon law which connects reason with divine commands and obligations. The current Catholic Church does not believe this, ascribing all power to the secular state, and rejecting the independence and importance of the Catholic faith in people’s lives. If the government says ingest poisons, imprison yourself, stop going to church, and live in fear, the Catholic Church poses no opposition or even mild criticism.
Most recent ‘scholarship’ is restating the obvious that the Catholic Church was the one indispensable organisation in the creation of the modern world. Ironically, this very institution which bequeathed so much, does not believe it contributed anything and demands its faithful to obey the Church of State.
The idea of ‘righteousness’ in the cult of Muhammad is based on following Muhammad’s example, believing in and venerating the Al Lah deity (celestial, moon, fertility idol) of Mecca, never questioning Koranic dogma, and living Sharia piety. The summary of this complete system of living, is enshrined in the daily Shahada prayer which tells the Muhammandan faithful to follow Muhammad and Al Lah and which curses Christians. Being a good or ‘righteous’ Muslim is about obeying and following, not necessarily about displaying a life where actions and attitudes are ‘moral’, or ‘just’.
The Arabic word 'Birr' is roughly defined to indicate 'righteous'. Only Muslims can possess Birr. Non-Muslims are cursed and dispossessed of any claim to Birr. The Koran, the cult document par excellence and the most supremacist ranting in history makes this clear.
Birr appears some 989 times in Hilali-Khan's Koranic translation. Birr lays out 3 immutable laws around being ‘righteous’:
1. The Koran is uber alles and the only book to contain the truth.
2. To be righteous is to follow Muhammad's commands unquestioningly and unhesitatingly.
3. The Unbelievers are not righteous and will be killed.
The 989 verses around being 'righteous' fall into these 3 categories. These 3 themes exemplify and help to amplify a cult and its cultural system of irrationality and blind cultural obedience. Liberation of the mind, the spirit, the body and even of ethical concepts is not important to Islam, Muhammad and cannot be found in the Koran. It is simply a communal program, subsuming the individual into the cult and assuring that the cult remains uber alles. Birr is an example of this doctrine. Some examples include.
The Koran rules and you will obey
|
This is the Book; in it is guidance sure, without doubt, to those who fear God; |
|
|
And who turns away from the religion of Abraham but such as debase their souls with folly? Him We chose and rendered pure in this world: And he will be in the Hereafter in the ranks of the Righteous. |
Note; Jews converting to Islam are encouraged to do so to 'save' themselves.
|
So We have made this (the Qur'an) easy in your own tongue (O Muhammad SAW), only that you may give glad tidings to the Muttaqun (pious and righteous persons - See V.2:2), and warn with it the Ludda (most quarrelsome) people. |
The Koran is the main instrument to hold the cult together. And who is the 'owner' of the manual, none other than its very creator the political-military terrorist Muhammad. How convenient. Seen in this light one can surmise that the Allah-thing is really Muhammad.
Follow the Muhammad or else.....
|
|
They believe in Allah and the Last Day; they enjoin Al-Ma'ruf (Islamic Monotheism, and following Prophet Muhammad SAW) and forbid Al-Munkar (polytheism, disbelief and opposing Prophet Muhammad SAW); and they hasten in (all) good works; and they are among the righteous. |
|
|
Those who believe [in the Oneness of Allah (Monotheism) and in Messenger Muhammad SAW, and do not apostate because of the harm they receive from the polytheists], and do righteous good deeds, surely, We shall remit from them their evil deeds and shall reward them according to the best of that which they used to do. |
|
|
Muhammad (SAW) is the Messenger of Allah, and those who are with him are severe against disbelievers, and merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and falling down prostrate (in prayer), seeking Bounty from Allah and (His) Good Pleasure. The mark of them (i.e. of their Faith) is on their faces (foreheads) from the traces of (their) prostration (during prayers). This is their description in the Taurat (Torah). But their description in the Injeel (Gospel) is like a (sown) seed which sends forth its shoot, then makes it strong, it then becomes thick, and it stands straight on its stem, delighting the sowers that He may enrage the disbelievers with them. Allah has promised those among them who believe (i.e. all those who follow Islamic Monotheism, the religion of Prophet Muhammad SAW till the Day of Resurrection) and do righteous good deeds, forgiveness and a mighty reward (i.e. Paradise) |
|
|
Verily, those who believe [in the Oneness of Allah, and in His Messenger Muhammad (Peace be upon him)) including all obligations ordered by Islam] and do righteous good deeds, they are the best of creatures. |
Is the above obvious enough. Allah is usually joined to Muhammad in the Koran. The two are inextricably linked. Why would a moon deity or any divine presence take such an interest in a man who led 88 military campaigns, engaged in Jihad, murder, racism, sex slavery, slave trading and the morbid but cultural prevalent action of bedding a 9-year-old girl? Further, even if you do ‘good deeds’ but do not follow the Muhammad-Al Lah complex, your deeds of just righteousness will avail you nothing, since by definition you are not a pious enough Muslim and you will still be punished and tormented.
Unrighteous Unbelievers will die
|
|
Therein they will cry: "Our Lord! Bring us out, we shall do righteous good deeds, not (the evil deeds) that we used to do." (Allah will reply): "Did We not give you lives long enough, so that whosoever would receive admonition, - could receive it? And the warner came to you. So taste you (the evil of your deeds). For the Zalimun (polytheists and wrongdoers, etc.) there is no helper." |
|
|
(He has made it) Straight to give warning (to the disbelievers) of a severe punishment from Him, and to give glad tidings to the believers (in the Oneness of Allah Islamic Monotheism), who work righteous deeds, that they shall have a fair reward (i.e. Paradise). |
|
|
Those who disbelieve, theirs will be a severe torment; and those who believe (in the Oneness of Allah Islamic Monotheism) and do righteous good deeds, theirs will be forgiveness and a great reward (i.e. Paradise). |
You can't read the Koran and try to understand Islam unless you critically examine its underpinnings, beginnings, and later development as a cult. No religion would proclaim that Unbelievers who are performing deeds of goodness and morality will suffer a 'severe torment'. That is simply an irreligious ideal. The Catholic Church has never condemned people who act in good faith but are not Catholic. ‘As we forgive those who trespass against us….’. Such people are not denounced, vilified and identified for torture; they are in fact prayed for. No Moslem can defend nor explain away, what their cult doctrine is really saying about ‘righteousness’. Within Muhammad’s cult, being just and ‘righteous’ is a laudatory appellation only applied to the most ‘fundamentalist’ of Muhammandans.
Rome fell in 476 AD due to a combination of economic; political; military and social factors but predominant amongst these was the decline in intelligence and in standards. Political intelligence in ancient Rome fell and collapsed into arbitrary, authoritarian rule, where the political elite could not competently manage the military and social resources of the vast empire. Security was lax and along many of the borderlands of the Roman empire, non-existent. Political leadership was cowardly with long lines of incompetent leaders rendered incapable of implementing needed political and military reform to protect Roman civilization. Social intelligence declined as well. Though Christianity was strong in parts of the empire, and comprised about 50% of the popoulation by 450 A.D., the low pagan standards, the lack of morality and a decline of rationality was a harbinger of political and military decline. The two fed each other. The lack of civic intelligence was directly reflected in the mismanagement of the empire by imbecilic political leaders. The lack of leadership and reform, and the low levels of all standards of conduct, thinking, and morality led to the debauchery of the public intellect. Thus did Rome fall. It was as Gibbon said, ‘not worth defending’. Now the question is – is our own civilization worth defending?
Western civilization has been under attack from globalists, socialists, Marxists and the welfare state for 60 years or 2 generations. It takes only one generation to destroy an ideal and eradicate the vestiges of civilization. We are thus pretty far advanced in the dismemberment of internal standards that guarantee progress and civilization. The all-powerful-state model has led ineluctably to lowering of all standards in public and private life. This is not to glorify repressive Puritanism; abstract fundamentalist Christianity or god forbid, the superstitious and silly paganisms of Native Indians or Muslims. However the all-powerful-state is just as much of a danger to our society and civilization as pagan Hitlerism, godless Communism or cultist Islam.
The state-as-God-complex, epitomizes the internal decline and much like Roman self-immolation it rots the body politic from within, spreading like a cancer until the host gives up and submits to external challengers. In the modern world the most excitable fascism which waits like a jackal for its Western prey to fall to the ground is the evil paganism that informs the fascistic elements of Islam. Islam has its red eye focused on Europe – the ancient cradle of Western civilsation – but the hyena will not be satiated with the creation of only EurArabia. It desires the elimination of all forms of Western civilization. The all-powerful-state is unwittingly aiding Islam in this goal by destroying through the guises of a Corona or Climate fascism, the very foundations of once Christian Western heterodoxy and civilisation.
How does the all-powerful-state, or the state-as-God and the attendant left-liberal orthodoxy aid the enemy of culture and civilized progress?
The omnipotent-omnivorous-state destroys the following important ‘pillars’ of societal development and civilisational creation: individualism; morality; spirituality; capital formation and innovation; high culture; and rationality including the force of reason. Europe is the classic case example of the state’s inimical effect upon the body politic. The state-as-God ideal is based on four faulty premises all of which lead to instability, self-hatred, lethargy and confused morality:
1. Western civilization is loathsome and evil.
2. Only a technocratic elite can safely mange the progress of society to ensure fairness and equality.
3. Spirituality leads to conflict and is unnecessary.
4. There are no standards of right and wrong, good and bad, high and low culture. All is good, all is relative, all is golden.
These premises which govern the welfare state are idiotic. Western civilization and the medeival ideals of our forbears along with Judeo-Christian ethics are the core organizing principles of our civilization and indeed of any civilization worth calling itself one. The institution of the Church has nothing to do with the basic ideals of Christian ethics nor does it negate the spiritual, intellectual and economic advancements given to mankind by the medieval and early modern ears, which were the greatest set of innovations in the history of human development.
The omnipotent-state promulgates that the Catholic Church for instance or the other worldliness of some parts of Christian doctrine, mean that the ethos, the principles and the preachings of Christianity are somehow unworthy. This is dangerous and anti-rational. Christianity is many things but neither Christ nor his main followers wanted a clerical elite [witness the attack by Christ against the moneychangers at the temple who used profits to enrich the clerical elite]; instead they focused on freedom; the eradication of slavery; empowerment of women; and mercy for the poor and sick. Importantly Christianity and Western ethics revolve around rational individuality and the methods to succeed in life and as well as coming to a personal understanding with God and your own existence. Dangerously the state-as-God replaces a spiritual essence, which all humans need to survive, with a belief in a technocratic, all-knowing elite, who 'own the science'. Personal salvation and the individual understanding of spirituality is thus replaced by government dictats. This inevitably leads to lower standards.
When a society has no spiritual faith or higher belief it disintegrates into mysticism or apathy. Thus our Western civ is now a godless hypocritical, and cowardly collection of self-loathers, which allows Islam and pagan cults offering up sacrifices to viruses or climate, step by step to build their mosques and temples over our Churches and freedoms. Unsure of itself and feeling unworthy in the face of those who seem so confident, the West submits, funding mosques which now are the most prominent features of many large European cities including Rome, encouraging Islamic immigration, and funding Koranic schools which teach hysterical anti-Western propaganda. Debasing our energy system with non-Gaia friendly and useless turbines and solar panels, ensuring penury and scarcity. Implementing gender fascism enforced by a useless police corps. The Western self hatred is evident in its submission to Islam and these cults of irrational stupidity through ‘hate laws’ governing all speech that could be ‘hurtful’ to the wonderful paganism of Islam [anti-Jew or anti-Christian hate speech is of course to be applauded and protected], or the various pets of climate and gender fascisms. The state-as-God demands the unfettered arrival of endless Islamic immigrants, as well as funding polygamy and ‘fetching marriages’ to 2nd cousins from the home country. Opposing such policies makes you a racist, fascist and criminal.
Submission to Islam, the Climate cult and the gender fascists, follows a general pattern of decline in Western society as it builds an anti-Christian, anti-rational world. Unfettered Muslim and African invasions, Corona and Climate Change are the hallmarks of this pagan immorality. Clean burning carbon, gas and coal are toxic. Work is eschewed. Profits forsworn. Innovations deemed unimportant. Productivity is not a concern. Welfare, vacation time, and redistribution are the vital keys to living. The rhetoric, the multi-cult technocratic model, and the replacement of high culture with low standards are exalted in an orgy of anti-Westen and anti-Caucasion racism and slander. Genders don't exist. Intelligence and reason are replaced by a mystic belief in the all-powerful state and an acceptance of the crude fascism exemplified by Islam or the Corona-Climate Fascisms.
Rome conquered Europe and fell in a self-flagellation of loathing, low standards and non-existent morality. Freedom has responsibility. Part of freedom is based upon high standards, rationality and knowing right from wrong; good from bad; and having the will to defend the fruits of millennia of labor and experimentation. The 'West' has failed and is now engaged in a civil war of destruction. History repeats and bites.
Muslim attacks in the EU-topia are a daily occurrence. The fake news platforms rarely report them, and if they do, they wail about ‘Islamophobia’ as the real danger, not the cultural, social and institutional evisceration of Western Europe. The Muhammadans are always the victims, even when Jihading, killing or raping. The Muhammandan criminals are usually listed as ‘men’ or ‘citizens’, with the Muhammandan motive discretely hidden or distorted. Thus in the UK, the Muhammadan sex Jihad gangs, who have preyed on 1 million white girls, are deemed to be ‘Asian’, unlikely to flatter a Mongolian or Thai who would view such depraved predations as simply acts of criminality and mental illness.
“Six people attacked with a knife in Château-Thierry, a suspect arrested,” France Bleu, October 8, 2022 (thanks to Medforth):
Friday evening in Château-Thierry, a man wounded six people with a knife, his mother and his brother then four passers-by, before being overpowered by the police who used a firearm, indicated the prefecture and a source close to the file.
Hit in the leg, the defendant continued his run for 150 meters “before stopping to take a prayer mat and a Koran out of his bag,” then starting “to make incantations while kneeling, which allowed his arrest,” continued Julien Morino-Ros, the prosecutor of Soissons.
“All the victims have been taken care of and their lives are not in danger,” indicated the prefecture of Aisne on Twitter. The man, who was shot and wounded during his arrest, is also out of danger, a source familiar with the matter said.
Just another day of Muslim violence in France, to be added to the 2 or 3 Churches which were no doubt vandalised on October 08 as well (the daily average across France). This violence is however not the Muslim’s fault. And the majority view in most EU countries, including Germany, that the cult of Muhammad does not belong in Europe is of course, just a manifestation of outrageous racism.
“Anti-Muslim sentiments prevalent in Germany – study,” TRT World, October 6, 2022:
Germany has witnessed growing racism and Islamophobia in recent years, fueled by the propaganda of far-right groups and parties.
Anti-Muslim attitudes are widespread in Germany, according to a recent study conducted by the Expert Council on Integration and Migration (SVR).
Nearly 48 percent of respondents said they believe “Islam is not compatible with the German society,” while 29 percent suggested restricting practice of Islam in the country.
Nearly 44 percent of Germans surveyed argued that Muslim organizations should be monitored by the state’s security agencies, while only 16 percent opposed such a move.
So, despising a supremacist-racist cult which is engaged in a low civil war, and which publicly postulates the demise of Judaism, Christianity and the eventual scaffolding of a Sharia state is the issue. Not the cult itself. Government, globalist and elitist propaganda of the most sordid, fetid and ignorant kind.
The cult of Muhammad is akin to the European Union or the endless surfeit of ‘International Organisations’. One can enter, but never leave. The Hotel California ethos applied to social control and societal regulation. Apostasy or renouncing any aspect of the Muhammadan cult’s doctrine, is punishable by death, according to Sharia barbarism (called a ‘Law’ by the dis-informers). No such demand exists in Christianity where the faithful can leave and even re-enter the Church based on their own free-will choice and belief system.
In the Qu’ran, those who leave or are insufficiently pious, are labelled as Munafiqun. A Munafiqun identifies someone who does not believe, or does not follow the dictates of the cult with enough purity and piety. Another name the Qur’an uses for such people is 'hypocrite' and this word is also applied to Christians and Jews who object to the cult doctrines of Muhammad or criticise any aspect of Muhammadan teaching. Munafiqun as a pejorative, targets and isolates a Moslem who does not follow the totality of Muhammadan-Sharia fascism, or Bronze-age ideals and Muhammadan contract law, named by Western Dhimmis as a legal code.
The concept of being a ‘Hyprocrite’, or someone who was a danger to the purity of the Muhammadan project appears quite early in the Qu’ranic records. They are viewed as a ‘5th column’ or elements within a uniform Muhammadan society which pose a threat to unity and obedience. In early Islamic history the term Munafiqun is applied to a fairly specific group of cult followers in a place called Madna who nominally accepted the authority of Muhammad whilst working in various covert and overt ways to hinder his mission [see Joseph Lumbard, “Islam Fundamentalism and the Betrayal of Tradition”]. The ‘impure’ followers in Madna and elsewhere were of course crushed and destroyed.
The allusion to hypocrites and the need to kill them abounds in the Koran and the Hadith. They are as dangerous and satanic as the Jews or Christians. The Muhammadan cult cannot survive unless the Munafiqun are purged.
3:116 Surely, those who reject Faith (disbelieve in Muhammad SAW as being Allah's Prophet and in all that which he has brought from Allah), neither their properties, nor their offspring will avail them aught against Allah. They are the dwellers of the Fire, therein they will abide. (Tafsir AtTabari, Vol. 4, Page 58).
2:27 Those who break Allah's Covenant after ratifying it, and sever what Allah has ordered to be joined (as regards Allah's Religion of Islamic Monotheism, and to practise its legal laws on the earth and also as regards keeping good relations with kith and kin), and do mischief on earth, it is they who are the losers.
4:138 Give to the hypocrites the tidings that there is for them a painful torment.
66:9 O Prophet (Muhammad SAW)! Strive hard against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be severe against them, their abode will be Hell, and worst indeed is that destination.
Apostasy is punishable by death. Munafiqun is a form of apostasy. You pretend to follow Mein Muhammad, but in your private life you don't and are 'striving' against the cult, 'doing mischief'. Sura 5:33 is very clear that those who 'do mischief' can be killed, executed, humiliated and crucified.
This is why Moslems the world-over will kill anyone they believe is disobeying the Koran, including their own family members or other Muslim sects they deem to be unorthodox or who do not follow Koranic demands without modification or doubt.
26 verses in the Koran reference the Mushrikun who are Infidels including polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah. To be a Mushrikun is a criminal offence satisfied by a death sentence. Mushrikun refers exclusively of course to non-Muslims. The supremacist world of the Koran cleanly divides the world into two. Islamic theological categorization makes this apparent [see here for more information]. It is hard for most Westerners brought up in Christian ideals of some degree of tolerance, acceptance and forgiveness, though a majority loathe and hate Christians; to comprehend a cult and its dichotomous view of the world. Mushrikun is nothing unique within the Koran. It is simply an extension of the other main categories of Islamic supremacism – Zalimun, Mufsidun, Musrifun, Mujrimun, Fasiqun, Shirk – which tell Moslems that the 'Kufar' is simply an inferior and must be dominated, humiliated, defeated, or conquered. Cults present such simpleton ideals in the pursuit of power and to merge church and state into one totalitarian complex.
9:33 It is He Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islam), to make it superior over all religions even though the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah) hate (it). (At-Taubah, Chapter #9, Verse #33)
The Koranic verses on Mushrikun clearly identify the non-Believing Kufar as a threat to Islam and ones who need to be killed:
9:5 Then when the Sacred Months (the 1st, 7th, 11th, and 12th months of the Islamic calendar) have passed, then kill the Mushrikun (See V.2:105) wherever you find them, and capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush. But if they repent and perform As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), and give Zakat, then leave their way free. Verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful (At-Taubah, Chapter #9, Verse #5)
Will some pious Moslem wail that it is all a 'misinterpretation' of the holy word of the Koran, written over 4 centuries by men, who were concocting a cult document. There appear to be plenty of 'mistranslations' of the moon cult's primary source document.
Fight and Kill them
9:2 So travel freely (O Mushrikun - See V.2:105) for four months (as you will) throughout the land, but know that you cannot escape (from the punishment of) Allah; and Allah will disgrace the disbelievers. (At-Taubah, Chapter #9, Verse #2)
9:36 Verily, the number of months with Allah is twelve months (in a year), so was it ordained by Allah on the Day when He created the heavens and the earth; of them four are Sacred (i.e. the 1st, the 7th, the 11th and the 12th months of the Islamic calendar). That is the right religion, so wrong not yourselves therein, and fight against the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah) collectively as they fight against you collectively. But know that Allah is with those who are Al-Muttaqun (the pious - See V.2:2). (At-Taubah, Chapter #9, Verse #36)
61:9 He it is Who has sent His Messenger (Muhammad) with guidance and the religion of truth (Islamic Monotheism) to make it victorious over all (other) religions even though the Mushrikun (polytheists, pagans, idolaters, and disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah and in His Messenger Muhammad) hate (it). (As-Saff, Chapter #61, Verse #9)
Mushrikun as Devils:
6:121: Eat not (O believers) of that (meat) on which Allah's Name has not been pronounced (at the time of the slaughtering of the animal), for sure it is Fisq (a sin and disobedience of Allah). And certainly, the Shayatin (devils) do inspire their friends (from mankind) to dispute with you, and if you obey them [by making Al-Maitah (a dead animal) legal by eating it], then you would indeed be Mushrikun (polytheists); [because they (devils and their friends) made lawful to you to eat that which Allah has made unlawful to eat and you obeyed them by considering it lawful to eat, and by doing so you worshipped them; and to worship others besides Allah is polytheism]. (Al-Anaam, Chapter #6, Verse #121)
16:100: His power is only over those who obey and follow him (Satan), and those who join partners with Him (Allah i.e. those who are Mushrikun i.e. polytheists. See Verse 6:121). (An-Nahl, Chapter #16, Verse #100)
No contracts can bind Moslems to the Dirty Polytheists
9:5 And a declaration from Allah and His Messenger to mankind on the greatest day (the 10th of Dhul-Hijjah - the 12th month of Islamic calendar) that Allah is free from (all) obligations to the Mushrikun (See V.2:105) and so is His Messenger. So if you (Mushrikun) repent, it is better for you, but if you turn away, then know that you cannot escape (from the Punishment of) Allah. And give tidings (O Muhammad) of a painful torment to those who disbelieve. (At-Taubah, Chapter #9, Verse #3)
They are going to Hell
48:6 And that He may punish the Munafiqun (hypocrites), men and women, and also the Mushrikun men and women, who think evil thoughts about Allah: for them is a disgraceful torment. And the Anger of Allah is upon them, and He has cursed them and prepared Hell for them - and worst indeed is that destination. (Al-Fath, Chapter #48, Verse #6)
The 'Dirty' cannot manage anything which is Islamic
9:17 It is not for the Mushrikun (polytheists, idolaters, pagans, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah), to maintain the Mosques of Allah (i.e. to pray and worship Allah therein, to look after their cleanliness and their building,), while they witness against their ownselves of disbelief. The works of such are in vain and in Fire shall they abide. (At-Taubah, Chapter #9, Verse #17)
And on it goes.
The big brains of the world will intone without any proof, that these verses relate to 'spiritual' struggle and that the Dirty Polytheists could really be anyone who is not 'religious'. In reality the Koran is very clear. Mushrikun are to be fought, killed, ignored, not allowed to manage anything which is Islamic, and to be shunned as pawns of Satan. Perhaps Moslems in their infinite sophistication and civilised culture, can explain this and convince us that these tenets inform a religion? Or maybe we should just accept what they have written, what they say, and what they do and deduce from these actions, deeds and words that the cult of Islam is a Manichean expression of intolerant pagan-fascism. Such a depiction seems to accord itself with facts.
In analysing Muhammad’s handbook of hate (Recital or Koran), it is fair to say that its primary focus is on the ‘Infidel’ and impious or not-pious-enough followers. Both categories are to be punished according to Sharia Law and Moslem precedence. The Infidel and the insufficiently devout Muslim both fall into the category of blasphemer and those who are ‘rebellious’ or ‘cause mischief in the land’. The key tenet and main tenor of the Koran and Muslim theology is absolute obedience to Muhammad, his words, deeds, sayings and to the opaque, vague and unknowable Al Lah, or Lord of Mecca which was Baal the moon deity and the chief idol of Muhammad’s family and his Quraysh tribe.
In pagan-fascist constructs used to weld together tribes, clans or nascent empires, the individual is consumed into the communal. The Koran is quite clear that free-will, thinking, doubting or questioning the great profiteer Muhammad are sins punishable by death. The clear dichotomy between ‘us and them’, makes it much easier to not only kill those who don’t follow the cult or are sufficiently pious in their public and private demonstrations of loyalty; but to keep the cult unified and together through a mixture of hate, racism, supremacism and loathing of the 'Unbeliever' who is portrayed in the Koran as 'unclean', 'unjust', 'unworthy', 'evil', 'untrustworthy' and destined for Hell. In fact, it is fair to say that the Koran is actually about the Infidel and the inferiority and satanic nature of the Infidel, since so much of the vitriolic bile which makes up the text concerns itself with those who will simply not submit and prostrate themselves to the Allah moon, celestial or fertility cult, depending on your view of ancient Arabian pagan worship.
-Those (Christians) are they whom Allah hath cursed...
- O you (Jews) who have been given the Book! believe that which We have revealed, verifying what you have, before We alter faces then turn them on their backs, or curse them as We cursed the violaters of the Sabbath, and the command of Allah shall be executed.
Over 500 verses in the Koran discuss the Infidel burning in Hell. Fully 8-10 % of the Koran is about the hated Infidel Kufar burning in Hell or 1 verse out of 12! Of the 114 Suras or chapters [or 111 depending on the version]; only 27 chapters do not make a reference to Unbelievers or Kufars burning in Hell and these are mainly small Suras, mostly ancient poems purloined by the Muhammandan cult, which comprise only 5 % of the total text! This means that in 95 % of the Koranic chapters we read a depiction of Infidels roasting in Hell or being punished in eternal damnation. This is not only astonishing but immoral bordering on evil. It is evil because non-Moslems are illustrated in Moslem liturgy and in their un-holy book as little more than kindling for Allah's Hell. Thus it must be okay in the Moslem mind to murder and eradicate these worthless beings since, “Surely the vilest of animals in Allah's sight are those who disbelieve” Qur'an (8:55)
The call to destroy the Infidel pig exists in over 500 verses. A very small sampling gives us an idea of just how ruthlessly fascistic this cult is to those who reject the dialectical omnipotence and self-promoting Muhammadan creation named the Allah-thing:
-Those who disbelieve Our revelations, We shall expose them to the Fire. As often as their skins are consumed We shall exchange them for fresh skins that they may taste the torment Lo! Allah is ever Mighty, Wise
-O Prophet! strive hard against the unbelievers and the hypocrites and be unyielding to them; and their abode is hell, and evil is the destination
-And the Jews say: Ezra is the son of Allah, and the Christians say: The Messiah is the son of Allah... Allah (Himself) fighteth against them. How perverse are they!
-But as for those who disbelieve, garments of fire will be cut out for them; boiling fluid will be poured down on their heads; Whereby that which is in their bellies, and their skins too, will be melted; And for them are hooked rods of iron
-When the fetters and the chains shall be on their necks; they shall be dragged Into boiling water, then in the fire shall they be burned
-But if he is of the rejecters, the erring, then the welcome will be boiling water and roasting at hell-fire
-O Prophet! Strive against the disbelievers and the hypocrites, and be stern with them. Hell will be their home, a hapless journey's end.
There is no tolerance in roasting non-Moslems in Hell and torturing them for eternity for the 'crime' of rejecting a moon cult run by Muhammad and his brigands. Neither does one read anywhere in the Koran about Moslems tolerating, respecting and aiding the Infidel. In fact, the Koran says the opposite that if a Moslem befriends an Infidel he is Munafiq or close to apostasy and can and should be punished. Muhammad repeatedly warns the 'Munafiqun' that to engage Infidels as friends or counsellors is prohibited and close to apostasy, a ‘crime’ punishable by death. But then again Allah is all-knowing, all-Wise and in his wisdom pace the Koran he has led the Kufar or Infidel’s soul 'astray' so that they may be punished and wickedly destroyed in everlasting Hellfire [see 14:27 for example]. That is what Moslems who follow the Koran believe anyways. Infidels are 'predestined' for Hell and pain. What about free-will? What about good faith works? What about reason? None of these concepts exists anywhere in the moon cult's exegesis. It is quite clear that Islam or Submission is a pagan-fascist cult, not a religion.
The cult of Muhammad is Christophobic. The Koran, Hadith, and cult doctrines are anti-Christian and extremist in their desire to eliminate the Christian churches. Many common terms used by Muslims and their leaders including Al Fasad and Shirk (polytheism, disbelief), Fitnah (wars to end disbelief), or Fujjar (a common criminal who disbelieves) to demonise Christians. There is nothing positive about Christianity within Muslim theological texts or beliefs. It is entirely negative. Christians must either be converted, or conquered, forced to submit, or killed.
An example of Muslim intolerance is the concept of Al-Fasad which is a word referencing 'polytheist criminals'. Non-Muslims are by Islamic doctrinal definition pagans and polytheists. Christians are polytheists since Orthodox Christian-worship supports the 'Trinity'. Jews are polytheists since they have conflated other idols [Yahweh] with Allah.
98-6: Verily, those who [despite all evidence] are bent on denying the truth -[be they] from among the followers of earlier revelation or from among those who ascribe divinity to aught beside God - will find themselves in the fire of hell, therein to abide: they are the worst of all creatures. 98:6
Al-Fasad is a serious category of criminality within Islamic theology. It is the same as being a Fujjar or common criminal, or a Mujrimun, a disbelieving polytheist sinner.
11-116 If only there had been among the generations before you, persons having wisdom, prohibiting (others) from Al-Fasad (disbelief, polytheism, and all kinds of crimes and sins) in the earth, except a few of those whom We saved from among them. Those who did wrong pursued the enjoyment of good things of (this worldly) life, and were Mujrimun (criminals, disbelievers in Allah, polytheists, sinners, etc.). [Hilali-Khan]
The Koran is clear that militant Al-Fasad criminals must be killed. Polytheists who accept Islam can be tolerated since they are taxed and can work for the benefit of the Moslem state and its rulers. But Mujrimun and Al-Fasad who fight back are to be exterminated:
5-33 The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.
Sura 5-33 is preceded by the oft-quoted phrase that murder is illegal. But this is only true if a Moslem kills a Moslem. If you are an Al-Fasad you can certainly be murdered:
5-32 Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allah by committing the major sins) in the land!
Sura 5-33 thus qualifies 5-32. As a Muslim you may kill someone in retaliation for a murder [“..if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder..] and importantly if you spread mischief in the land you can be obviously be killed since you are a criminal polytheist. 5-32 portrays the rejection by the Jews [Al-Fasad and Mujrimun] of Allah's 'signs'. As such they can be killed since be default, they are spreading mischief.
2-27 Those who break Allah's Covenant after ratifying it, and sever what Allah has ordered to be joined (as regards Allah's Religion of Islamic Monotheism, and to practise its legal laws on the earth and also as regards keeping good relations with kith and kin), and do mischief on earth, it is they who are the losers.
The 'losers' will go to hell of course.
13-25 And those who break the Covenant of Allah, after its ratification, and sever that which Allah has commanded to be joined (i.e. they sever the bond of kinship and are not good to their relatives), and work mischief in the land, on them is the curse (i.e. they will be far away from Allah's Mercy); And for them is the unhappy (evil) home (i.e. Hell).
The entire point of identifying Al-Fasad and Mufsidun is to warn anyone, including wavering Moslems, of embracing pagan polytheism. If you are a polytheist you are going to either, be killed by the Allah-cult, or go to hell. The main theme is that Islam as a political-social project can only remain strong if polytheism is wiped out within Islamic lands and the pagans are made to feel inferior and hunted.
16-88 Those who disbelieved and hinder (men) from the Path of Allah, for them We will add torment over the torment; because they used to spread corruption [by disobeying Allah themselves, as well as ordering others (mankind) to do so].
The objective of the Mohammed cult is complete control over society and indeed the globe in the form of a unified church-state complex. Fitnah or unending wars against the polytheists is assured until this is accomplished:
8-73 And those who disbelieve are allies to one another, (and) if you (Muslims of the whole world collectively) do not do so (i.e. become allies, as one united block with one Khalifah - chief Muslim ruler for the whole Muslim world to make victorious Allah's Religion of Islamic Monotheism), there will be Fitnah (wars, battles, polytheism, etc.) and oppression on earth, and a great mischief and corruption (appearance of polytheism).
Al-Fasad and the criminal polytheists must be fought until a unified Caliphate is established across the globe. The Koran makes this clear and makes this an objective and imperative. The categorization of polytheists as criminals, does not offer much in the way of tolerance towards non-Muslims.
Many 'moderate' Muslims might be as pious as the Christian-itinerant who attends church once a year and looks no deeper into his faith than to celebrate its festivals and rituals. Faith tourists. The ‘moderate’ Muslim may know very little about their cult. The modern Catholic or Protestant may also be uninformed about their church, its history, catechism, miracles and civilisational duty. But this hardly excuses the doctrines espoused by the Muhammadan cult, which are at great variance, even oppositional, to those of orthodox, believing Christianity. When studied in detail we can see that the Muhammandan doctrine supports Muslim supremacism and dominance. An important aspect of this, which informs Muslim jurisprudence and is found throughout the Koran and Hadith, is the idea of ‘Zalimun’.
This is a term which can be spelled in different ways including Zalimeen, Zalimin, or Zalimoon [from Dhaalimoon], and it means the 'unjust'. Unjust in the Koran is not a matter of moral ethics. It is the division between the 'just' or Muslim, and the rest named the 'unjust'. It is a black and white bifurcation of the world. The non-Muslims or wrong doers must be punished or killed. Sura 9:29-33 makes it clear that all Jews and Christians must be yoked under Muslim tutelage. They are in essence Muslim slaves who simply will not submit to the Allah-thing.
“Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low.....He it is Who hath sent His messenger with the guidance and the Religion of Truth, that He may cause it to prevail over all religion, however much the idolaters may be averse. ”
Using Koranic theology, the Zalimun are The Wrong-doers and the unjust.
1.) Arabic Root zlm: original meaning: putting in a wrong place az-zâlimûn: the wrong-doers, evil-doers, those who transgress the proper limit (as in sura al baqara 2-229) and encroach upon the right of some other people.
The wrong doers are:
a.) Those who transgress Allah's limits (2-229)
b.) Those who invent a lie and attribute it to Allah (3-94)
c.) Those who are disbelievers (2-254)
d.) Those who take the disbelievers for friends (9-23)
e.) Those who judge by other than the law (sharî`ah) of Allah (5-45)
f.) Those who wrong themselves, their own souls (2-231)
What constitutes a 'wrong-doer' in Koranic and Islamic theology based on the above list? The following applies:
1-Christians who like the Jews have rejected the key tenets of the Muhammadan cult, especially to follow and believe only the Al Lah and his only messenger the Muhammad. We see this in all long chapters in the Koran and many smaller chapters as well [link to Christophobia in the Koran]
2-Jews. [Koran 2:140, 3:93-94, 11:18, 21:29, 59:17....]
3-All non-Muslims or Unbelievers. [2:254, 2:258, 3:57, 3:128...]
4-Polytheists or Mushrikun. [2:140, 3:151, 5:72, 6:20, 6:56, 10:106..]
5-'Moderate' or non-bellicose Muslims. [9:47, 24:50, 59:17..], Jihad is a central pillar of Islam (the 2nd most important after obeying the Al Lah and his only messenger the Muhammad)
6-All Muslim sinners including apostates. [43:74, 68:29, 9:23]
7-Blasphemers who desecrate by word or thought the Al Lah, thinking for example, that he might be a pre-Mohammedan male moon idol with 3 Goddesses as his wives, and daughters as well. [3:94, 6:21, 6:93, 6:144, 11:18...]
8-Blasphemers who doubt anything Muhammad said or did
9-Friends of the Zalimun. [6:129, 45:19]
This list of the unjust Zalimun who must be fought, subjugated, and dominated, if not killed outright, constitutes a rather impressive array of most if not all, non-Muslims. The Koran is openly Christophobic, and states in many places that the friends of Christians, who are also called polytheistic (The Trinity) must be fought and killed. At the very least as the Koran makes clear, you should never be friends with the Christian or polytheist, unless it benefits the Muhammadan cult in some way.
Along with Christians the Jews are the arch enemies of Muslims and are obvious candidates as Zalimun. Islam believes that all people are born Muslim, and that the Jewish patriarchs such as Moses were in fact Moslem prophets. The Jews rejected this true God or Allah, and it's prophets by engaging in Yahweh worship. For Muslims the Jewish worship of another Godhead is a major sin and could be described as a paganism. The same is true of Christians. Early Muslim leaders and theologians including Mohammed, described the Christians as pagans because they worshipped a Trinity of the son, the Father and the Holy spirit. Pagans are Zalimun of course as are Muslims who are not Jihadic, pious or firm enough with the enemies of Islam.
It is vital to note this about the Koran. It rewards Muslims and punishes or kills the rest. Thus, Muslims will lie [Taqqiya], and state that Zalimun are those who 'do wrong'. This is not true. The only objective test in Koranic theology that one must pass to be considered 'good', is whether or not you follow the Allah-thing, his or its mouthpiece Mohammed, and whether you base your life around Koranic canons and rituals and aid Muslims or do what makes the Muslim community stronger. This could and does include emigration to make non-Muslim areas, Muhammadan (called Hijra or the emigration imitating Muhammad’s move to Medina in 622 A.D.). Even Muslims must admit this.
Within Islam good works are simply those deeds which conform to Mohammed's and Allah's expectations written in the Koran, to be followed by laws based on the Koran. In Muhammadanism, the Koran is uber-alles. If you do something that is not within Koranic law it is considered bad, evil, or an action against the cult.
This important categorization of Zalimun versus the pious Muslim must have an impact on the way that many Muslims view the world. If they truly believe that this Allah-thing, this dialectical force which is never defined and which use to denote a male moon deity, operates through Mohammed and the Koran and demands that the entire world conform to its doctrine, than we have a vast, almost insoluble problem. Zalimun would animate racism, supremacism, violence and intolerance would it not? And isn't that what we see every day across and inside Islam's bloody borders? Jews, Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, impious Muslims, secular Muslims, pagans, animists....all being harassed, killed, marginalized, demonized, and attacked by those who believe in Zalimun as decreed by Mohammed.
