French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  

Recent Articles

Muhammad and Hitler. Pagan Fascism. The similarities of the programs are remarkable.

Muslim Fascism. Never discussed by the big brains.

Bookmark and Share






 

Hitler declared many times that Linz Austria must become the new Mecca. A place of cult pilgrimage where Nazi pagan monuments and rituals would overawe the true believer. It was not a mistake that Hitler chose Islam and Mecca as his model. For he and Mohammed and the cults they created, were quite similar.

 

If you read the history of Mohammed and the formation of his cult, two obvious observations come to mind. First Islam is based on a moon cult, suffused with some Judaic notions of monotheism. Second, the racism, supremacism, violence, calls to war, the innumerable campaigns, the pilfering and rape of caravans and towns, and the code of obedience, all foreshadow Nazism and the modern pagan cults embodied in the leaderships of Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin and Stalin.

 

Since no-one in the Lower educational or Fake media establishments bothers to read about Mohammed, these uncomfortable truths – the war, the hate, the bile, the carnage, the injunction to conquer the world – are quietly untold. But that is the real historical Mohammed. He was not a great man, as Time Magazine ejaculated when assigning status to the most important individuals in history. Mohammed was a monster, a man who created a cult, which as Churchill remarked, inculcated in its votaries a primitive, and ruthless passion – the scourge of civilisation

 

Only a modern liberal-Marxist would possibly assert that Mohammed was anything other than a pagan-fascist leader of the bloodiest order.

 

What is a fascist anyways?

 

The word gets thrown around a lot – usually by ignorant liberals and Marxists as they try to shut down inquiry, debate or rationality. Any opposition to the insipid liberal-Marxist view of the world including: the Covid cult, globaloney warming; anti-capitalism; anti-Semitism; pro-Arabism; pro-huge Government; and cheap anti-Americanism; is immediately met with howls of 'Hitler' and 'Fascist'. How stupid. Yet for a cult and its leader, who are and were fascistic there is a gaping, dumb silence.

 

There are variations in fascism of course. But essentially the main ideas of a fascism are the following. In the book ‘Fascism and Paganism’, modern fascism uses the guise of spirituality in the form of paganism, to unify its followers, around an ideal of controlling society and indeed the world. As the expert Paxton states in page 40 of his book 'Fascism'; 'Fascism seeks out in each national culture those themes that are best capable of mobilising a mass movement of regeneration, unification, and purity, directed against liberal individualism and constitutionalism...The themes that appeal to fascists in one cultural tradition may seem simply silly to another.'

 

Indeed. A fascist is then a person who follows the demands of pagan cult – unyieldingly. The oft-cited complaint, '...come on Hitler and Mohammed had nothing in common, and the programs each led, were different....' is only partially true. Certainly, to unify a backwards, 7th century illiterate mob of Bedouins, into a military-political force requires much different stratagems, than doing the same with reasonably well educated; cultured; and Europeanized 20th century Germans. The details of the programs and leadership styles do not have to match. Just the objectives and aspects of what the programs want to achieve. In that regard Hitler and Mohammed are remarkably similar.

 

Mohammed's life is hardly discussed today.

 

Every aspect of Christianity and Christ has been picked over, accepted, rejected, ridiculed, debated and calibrated within archaeological science and philosophy.

 

Not so with Mohammed and Islam. We are just supposed to bow our heads and accept the fact that Mohammed was a 'prophet'. Maybe he was – of death. If you read Robert Spencer's fine book, 'The Truth about Mohammed', or information about what he actually did in his, you will very quickly get a different view of the man.

 

In short Mohammed was a precursor of Hitler.

 

His career and his program carried through on the 10 main principles we can see when observing a pagan-fascism – be it Marxist-Communism; Hitlerism or Mohammedanism. Keep in mind the medieval Christians were a lot smarter than the moderns who exist in our post-modern utopia today. They called the cult of Mohammed, Mohammedanism, i.e. the cult of its leader. They did not ascribe the word submission or Islam to the cult. Rather interesting.

 

The key underlying elements of any pagan cult and associated intolerant fascism – as given by Paxton and many others – is the following:

 

1.Leader and elite control.

2.Ideology as propaganda not reality

3.Cult pretending to be divinely inspired.

4.Terror and control.

5.Racism/Supremacism/Universalism.

6.Cross-Class appeal.

7.Economic Autarchy.

8.Hatred of individualism and liberalism.

9.Jihadic War and domination.

10.Rigidity and inevitable collapse.

 

Fascisms are always doomed to failure. The crass ignorance and rejection of reality, its hatred of anything to do with modernity, and the stupefying ritualisation, propaganda, terrorist methods, and brute force, all kills the juridical and moral person in its followers. When that occurs the paganism, if confronted by military force, will evaporate. A lesson that most of the Marxist-liberal establishment and the plump, well-fed denizens of happy Europe, Canada and elsewhere, fail to understand.

 

So, what did Mohammed do in his eventful life, which so changed the world and has led us, with wailing Marxists and internationalists in tow, into a war with the fascistic elements of Mohammedanism? Like Hitler he created a political-military machine, unified by a pagan cult, supposedly divinely inspired.

 

Hitler, an Atheist who hated Christians and the Church (Christ and Paul were Jews, Christianity destroyed the maculine Teutonic culture etc), chattered that God had sent him to preserve Europe against the Jewish Bolshevist revolutionaries. Indeed, in his propaganda appeal to Britons, Hitler constantly used this theme to try to win a British alliance. Mohammed was less nuanced. He took Judaism, the ideals of monotheism and fastened them onto the reigning cult of the moon at Mecca – al-ilah or Allah – pronouncing it the successor to all previous religions. Since Jews and Christians were prevalent in Arabia at this time, it is obvious he was trying to unify the illiterate Bedouins to confront and then eject the Jewish-Christian competitors and steal their riches. Monotheism in the eyes of the political Mohammed seemed a very powerful tool indeed.

 

Seeing disarray and foreign control of trade and riches, Mohammed cleverly devised a competing program and a compelling commentary to unite the various Arab tribes under his leadership. Like Hitler's Nazis Mohammed would use force; the promise of economic bounty; and spirituality, to achieve his aims. Since all of Arabia worshipped some form of al-ilah or the Moon deity, and all Arabs prayed to rocks; the use of Allah would be an inspired and intelligent means to appeal across classes, tribes and regions to obtain spiritual support for his program.

 

Inspired by his divine dreams and religious spirit, Mohammad through peaceful means had converted about 70 people in Mecca by 622 AD to his concept of Islam [submission to Allah]. He was however driven out of Mecca by those who saw his new theology as a threat to the city’s current paganism. After fleeing to Medina Mohammad rejected peaceful methods and turned to violence. Al Dashti, an Iranian Muslim and scholar of Islam states, ‘After the move to Medina….he became a relentless warrior, intent on spreading his religion by the sword, and a scheming founder of a state.’

 

For Mohammad war was the means to build his own powerful state. Islam is not a religion but a state construct using paganism fused with monotheism as its unifying culture. Using the Medinians and their men, Mohammad made war upon Mecca finally defeating the Meccans in 624 AD at the battle of Badr. This battle was not an overwhelming victory of course.  Only 300 Muslims fought 800 Meccans, and less than 100 men were killed or injured.  The importance of the battle for Muslims was that they were not defeated, and that Mohammed's claim that Al-Allah intervened with forces of angels to disperse the Meccans, might be a plausible explanation as to why a force 2.5 times smaller than its foe, was able to stand its ground and fend off what should have been a defeat.  Badr confirmed Mohammed, his mission and his faith in the Meccan moon deity, Al-Allah, which was conveniently, his family's personal deity, and one that his relations took care of in the Kabaa shrine - the economic and spiritual center of pagan, celestial-worshipping, Arabia.

 

At this crucial battle in which Mohammad gained control of local Meccan and Medina area tribes he, ‘took a handful of gravel when the battle was extremely heated [and] threw it at the faces of the pagans saying 'May Your faces be disfigured.'  He also fought in the battle - he would have had to, all leaders in the pre-modern world, led their men from the front. If a leader did not show personal valour, strength, or courage, he would lose all credibility with his troops.  This battle and Mohammad’s violence during laid the foundation of the Islamic State and made the Muslims a terrifying force of gangsters and opportunists. Islam was built in the fires and blood of war – not in peace and charity. Its ethos is imbued with this martial spirit. After winning the battle of Badr Mohammad and his men spent 3 days killing the prisoners. Then with the Meccan and Medinian tribes under his control he ordered the spread of Islam and its empire by sword, as well as the eradication of his former Jewish allies in Medina and beyond.

 

Ironically some Jews originally supported Mohammed. But this did not prevent the virulent anti-semiticism which imbues Islamic thought from forming. Indeed, Mohammed and his followers beheaded 700 Jewish men of the Khuraysh tribe after conquering its stronghold as a reprisal for endeavouring to aid a Meccan army, which failed to conquer Medina.  The women were taken as sex slaves, and Jewish assets, money and property was divided between the followers of the moon cult - with Mohammed taking the fairest of the women, and the largest share of the booty.  Hating the Jew is of course one of the great unifying themes of the Koran, Islamic history and Muslim imperialism.  The mothers and daughters were taken as sex slaves or sold off.

 

From these early military victories, the Mohammedans, swept across Arabia and beyond, fuelled by their absolute paganism [one word, one Allah, one Mohammad, in imitation of Hitler`s one people, one state, one leader], which created an esprit de corps and ruthlessness that other tribes and cities could not withstand.

 

University of Chicago professor Fred Donner, in his book ‘The Early Islamic Conquests’, theorizes that there may be something intrinsic to Islam that spurs a conquering attitude: "[T]here is the possibility that the ideological message of Islam itself filled some or all of the ruling elite with the notion that they had an essentially religious duty to expand the political domain of the Islamic state as far as practically possible; that is, the elite may have organized the Islamic conquest movement because they saw it as their divinely ordained mission to do so."

 

Mohammed was a fascist in the true sense of the word. A fascistic mind is one which desires to destroy the individual and place the person, inside a communal cult, where his life is ritualized and managed, for the benefit of the cult and its leadership. Fascist personalities thus neuter the moral, juridical, spiritual, and rational mind of their followers.  They create fantasies to justify their deeds [like the Koran].  They isolate and demonize an 'enemy' [the Jew, the infidel, the Hindu etc.].

 

They establish strict and severe laws which must be followed or the person will be subjected to punishment or perhaps death.  Police systems are created to ensure compliance [Gestaop, NKVD, KGB, 'Religious' Police].  The fascistic mind and his cult engages in murder, deceit, theft and destruction of any centers of opposition - and justifies it with myths and 'divine' liturgy, approval, or some magical 'dialecticism', which can be seen only by the leaders of the cult, who have god-given inspirational powers of intellect and understanding.

 

The fascist mind manufactures a system which needs to expand to keep the various competing parties and sects unified. War is thus the natural expression of a fascism - unending war be it for lebensraum; a class-less 'world' society; or to spread the Umma to all parts of the globe. The fascistic mind and its created cult demands submission of everyone to its paganism, and its ruthless regime.  All of this aptly sums up Islam and Mohammed.

 

Mohammed was an anti-Semite who killed with his own hands. He raped a 9-year-old girl. He led 80 odd military expeditions. He raided, warred, and stole gold, land, women, slaves and property.  He was violent, lecherous, spiteful, adulterous, and conniving. He was also like Hitler, and to a lesser extent Stalin, probably quite mad. Much of the Koran is simply an embarrassment of jabbering stupidity.

 

Mohammad had revelations which can be read in the gibberish that makes up the Koran including: sanctioning highway robbery; raiding and killing during Ramadan the pagan Arab month in which all war was suspended in lieu of farming, trade and prayer; favoring war against unbelievers [until there was no religion other than Allah’s]; promising paradise and 72 nubile virgins in return for those killed in jihad; Allah’s approval of his taking 20 % of all booty captured in war, [100 % in peace]; Allah consenting to his having sex with a 9 year old girl; Allah’s support in practicing adultery and polygamy [even with married women]; Allah’s agreement in destroying Jewish and Christian villages and trade caravans; Allah’s permission to engage in slave trading. Many more malicious revelations could be listed but the above are some examples of ‘divine’ revelations that Allah [Arabic word meaning the moon], gave unto Mohammad.

 

Isn't the above directly derived from a mentality which is distorted, and which wants to pervert and invert the real world of the 5 senses?  Is this not the great exemplar of fascism?

 

As one would expect when dealing with a deranged politician, revelations would miraculously occur when Mohammad wanted something or needed to distance himself from crimes past or current. Any sane person listening to such nonsense would declare the speaker insane. Hitler and Lenin were obviously mad men. We can add Mohammed to that group.

 

Modern day apologists and mainstream-media and political ‘experts’ really do need to perform some primary research on Mohammad before pronouncing that Islam is holy and peaceful. For my part I put much more faith in minds such as that possessed by Alexis de Tocqueville, the 19th century American interpreter and political scientist par excellence, then in modern day liberal media personalities; “I studied the Koran a great deal…..few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. As far as I can see, it is the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world, and though less absurd than the polytheism of old, its social and political tendencies are in my opinion infinitely more to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a form of decadence rather than a form of progress in relation to paganism itself.”

 

No doubt about it.

 

But don`t worry no one today will say it. For the multi-cult losers, Mohammed and his fascist moon cult are simply peace, brotherhood, fun-times and grinning 'moderation'.

 

 

The myth of the Moderate Muslim

Rewrite the Koran, reform Islamic theology, separate church from state.....

Bookmark and Share

 

Keeping up with Muslim New-speak is very difficult. Muslims are masters at propaganda – with the Saudi's the master black magicians of the art of deception.  Iranian propaganda money also saturates Western institutions.  Every event or conflict involving the followers of the male Meccan moon deity and Mohammedanism is recast by the Muslims as a struggle between 'faith' and bigotry, [Islam and Western civilization]; 'enlightenment' and ignorance; or cultural freedom and oppression [Muslims vs. The Rest]. In Western society the ability of Muslims to use New-speak is astounding. What is insane is the acceptance of such nonsense by academia, politicians and the fake news media.

 

Muslim newspeak in North America and Europe is controlled by various Muslim groups who purport to speak for millions of Muslims resident in the West.  Examples are CAIR, ISNA or the MSA.  These groups are largely funded by the Saudis, Iranians or terror organisations. FBI and other investigations reveal that the linkages between 'moderate' Muslim groups and Islamo-fascist and radical organisations are legion and deep.

 

Western domiciled Muslims constantly whine about being 'targets' of 'white' 'racism.  The Muhammadan cult is of course, not a ‘race’ so racism cannot be the issue when discussing the cult itself, composed as it is of Arabs, Indians, Blacks, Whites and Asians. Islam as a movement, is a clearly a political-ideology of power and control. Any cursory reading of Islamic history and the Koran would dispel the notion that Islam is a faith.

 

Typical Moslem justifications for any act of Islamic terror would include the following Newspeak dupes:

 

-Not all Muslims are terrorists

-Islam is 'reacting' against Western aggression

-Muslims are largely peaceful and charitable

-Most Muslims are 'moderate'

-This was due to mental illness or misunderstanding Mein Koran

-Drugs and alcohol were involved

-‘Racism’ prompted this violent action

-This is an 'isolated' case

-'They' are not real Muslims

-The welfare state is insufficiently generous and solicitous of Muslims and this creates aggravation and resentment

 

The same list could have been used to justify Hitlerism; Stalinism; and Chinese Maoist fascism, and dozens of other fascisms so coveted and caressed by leftists and multi-culturalists. Not all Shinto Japanese in 1941 were anti-Western or as extremist as the military junta. Nazis were comprised of peaceful teachers, scientists, soccer players, actors and businessmen who were not as 'extreme' as Goering or Hitler. Russian grandmothers in 1970 had little inclination to world domination or the overthrow of American democracy. Chinese entrepreneurs today, are probably uninterested in invading Taiwan, overturning US elections, or working with the US deep state to embed socialist-communism in the USA.  Ergo I would expect that most Muslims living in the West are not 'the same' as the 'radicals', evident and so active over 1400 years of Islamic imperialism and Jihad.

 

So what. It is the theology of the cult which matters. Not the individual. This is especially true if the individual does nothing to reform the cult, its documents, its rituals, and its expectations. Thus the singular 'moderate' Muslim who tells you what you want to hear, and appears pious, plays the piano, dresses well and appears civilized, is hardly important in the grand scheme of his cult. If he is not determined to rewrite the Koran, reform the Hadiths, open up Islam to inquiry and even ridicule, then he too is part of the problem.

 

Since 9-11 there have been 40.000 Muslim attacks across the world. Slavery still goes on, even within the West, in the sex trading for marriage of young girls. I know because I have met some of these victims.  Moslems, Arabs and Blacks own, today, right now, some 5-10 million Black slaves in Africa.  Hindu girls in their thousands in East India have disappeared, taken as prisoners by Muslim Bangladeshis, raped, and forced to join Islam [to produce male Ghazi or Muslim warriors]. Attacks and racism against Jews and Christians are weekly events across the world. Yet not one single Muslim demonstration by these vaunted moderates has taken place anywhere in the Western world since 9-11. Not a single one.

 

Yet we are assured, 'all' Muslims are 'moderates'. Muslims are establishing radicalized schools all across the Western world teaching pure Islamic doctrine, which is by itself anti-Western, racist and supremacist. The media and politicians describe these schools as 'moderate'. In Europe every large city has more than a dozen of them, many funded by both Saudi-Wahabbi money, and state money. Many have deep connections to various Islamic-fascist groups overseas. In fact, the number of Muslim organisations and schools with connections to 'radical' Islam within the West are now are almost too many to count. Thirty years ago, there was only a handful. Yes, there is a Moslem tide, an invasion, a takeover of Western urban areas.  London UK currently has 500 mosques, implying a total Muslim population of 2.5 million, in a city of 10 million.  30 years ago, the Muslim presence in London was minimal. 

 

There is no proof that 'moderate' Muslim groups exist and if they do, they are poor, under-funded, under-manned, and largely silenced. Blasphemy rules apply in Islam.  You cannot criticise Muhammad, Mein Koran or Islamic theology.  The penalty is death. 

 

Moderate Islam might be what the 'mass' of Muslims desire, but there is precious little proof that this 'mainstream' Islam wants anything else other than more power, more state funding; more mosques; more adherents and widespread Koranic practice embedded in Sharia Law. Nothing is more obviously a threat to Western civilisation than the imposition of a totalitarian creed premised on pre-7th century codes which are not even laws in the modern sense; designed to meld together, church and state. Nothing is moderate about such a construction.

 

The only moderate Muslim is one who will agree to rewrite the Koran, the Hadiths and open up Islam to inquiry, ridicule and reformation and separate the church from the state. That is the only definition of a moderate Muslim. Period.

 

 

The Totalitarian DNA of the Muslim cult. Sura 30 as an example.

Christophobic, Infidelophobic. The unHoly Trinity of Muhammad's cult.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

Most of the Fake Experts, Fake News commentators, the Fake-tolerant Muslims on the Fake News, the Fake-academics (quacks), the Fake Google Phds (Muhammad’s cult is peace, don’t be a racist) and the fecal-littering glitterati of me-social-media (imitating Hussein Obama’s collection of tomes entitled, ‘Me’); have not read the Koran (Mein Koran), nor bothered to understand 1400 years of Muslim Jihad, which is on full display in the modern world, every week. 

 

All of the ‘larger’ Suras are 40-50% hate speech, preaching violence against the Infidel.  The ‘smaller’ Suras (starting after Sura 31), are likewise as violent and intolerant, though different in that they were coined (and in some cases plagiarised) before the Meccan moon cult was uber alles.  Once Muhammad’s cult was militarily supreme, Suras 2 to 30 make their appearance, and call for either the conversion of the Infidel or their liquidation. 

 

In Sura 30, which most people have not read, we are confronted by a text, which taken just as it is written, is bitterly Christophobic and anti-Semitic.  Remember that Al Lah means the Lord of Mecca.  It does not – does not – denote the Christian Godhead.  Al Lah was Baal or Hubaal the moon deity.  The shrine of Baal was caretaken by Muhammad’s family.  This is well known to any scholars of Arab history and archaeology.  For Muhammad however, the Baal cult must be uber alles so he smashes all the idols in the Kabaa shrine when his army takes over Mecca in 630 AD and relegates all other cults subservient to his cult. 

 

As one would expect Sura 30 reviewed previously here, has nothing good to say about the Infidel, concerned as it is with the fall of the 'Roman' empire.  Close to 30 % of this Sura threatens non-Moslems with destruction in this life or in the next. It is hard to make the claim that Islam is a 'religion' when 1/4 or more of every single Koranic chapter is imbued with violence against those outside of the cult.

 

Muhammad demands that all cults, religions and beliefs serve Baal.  The English translation of ‘God’ in the verse below, threatening Christians with hell, is not what the original Arabic states which is Lord or Al Lah.  The two ideals are vastly different. 

 

030:009
* 
URL

Do they [Unbelievers] not travel through the earth, and see what was the end of those before them? They were superior to them in strength: they tilled the soil and populated it in greater numbers than these have done: there came to them their apostles with Clear (Signs). (Which they rejected, to their own destruction): It was not God Who wronged them, but they wronged their own souls

 

The 'signs' which include all-natural phenomena are detailed in verses 19-25. Just being alive is for example, a clear 'sign' that Allah rules. This is called a fallacious tautology.

 

Sura 30 rejoices over the 'prophecy' real or actual, that the Al Lah moon deity would allow Moslems to defeat 'Rome'.  The Eastern Romans or Byzantines saw much of their territory reduced by Muhammad's cult in the decade from 636 to 645 AD. The Levant, Egypt, Libya and Tunisia were all conquered, including Jerusalem or city of 'peace'.  Attempts in the 9th, 10th, 16th and 17th centuries were also made to conquer Rome itself. 

 

The Roman Empire has been defeated” [30:2].

 

This colossal failure – military and economic – of the Greeks' inability to defeat the marauding Arabs at the Yarmuk river in 636 AD fuelled the Arab self-concept that Islam was destined to rule not only Constantinople, but Rome and the entire world. History would be much different, and a lot better, if the Byzantines had been ably led, not devastated by a century of wars with the Persian Sassanids and better informed about their Arab adversaries in 636 A.D. An Arab defeat in 636 A.D. would have confined Islam's cult of death to the beggarly and backwards Arab peninsula.

 

The Koranic scribblers, authors of little talent and education, attributed the success of Muslim arms to of course, the moon deity, Allah. “With the help of Allah. Never does Allah depart from His promise: but most men do not understand.” [30:6]. The 'promise' is that the world will become unified under one ideology – that of Islam: “Those who reject Faith will suffer from that rejection: and those who work righteousness will spread their couch (of repose) for themselves (in heaven).” [30:44]

 

Faith for Muslims means Islam. Anyone who is outside of Islam is damned, “Travel through the earth and see what was the End of those before (you): most of them worshipped others besides Allah.” [30:42]

 

Sura 30 also identifies that Islamic faith simply means a faith in Muhammad, the Allah-thing, and the Koran.  This is the Muslim (un)Holy Trinity.  That is all.  Criticising any aspect of the (un)Holy Trinity is a blasphemy punishable by death. 

 

In reality what does this mean besides intolerance, conformity, mind-less submission and a hatred of the Infidel?

 

The (un)Holy Trinity of Muhammadism means that your ‘salvation’ is not based on good works, a faith in humanity and free-will, or a faith in tolerance to those outside the cult, nor a faith in the Golden Rule, nor a faith in rationality and the promise of faith through reason.  Moslem faith simply means the blind obedience of fanaticism to whatever Muhammad or Allah [they are one and the same] said, did, demanded and wrote down in the Koran. Moslem faith by logical deduction is the opposite of Christianity.  ‘Righteous deeds’ in Muslim liturgy refers only to deeds which support, venerate and expand the Muhammadan cult.  ‘Righteous deeds’ do not apply to non-Muslims.  Most Westerners simply do not understand that simple fact.

 

The above ineluctably means that the Muslim cult will be a violent, ignorant, stupid, irrational and fatalistic grouping.  Islam will rule because Muhammad and Allah said so.  This is called a tautology.  The highest aspiration for a Moslem is to follow the peculiarity and rigours of the Koran.  This is the method of a cult, and not that of a religious inspiration.  The cult will rule the world because the Allah thing has promised his 'slaves' earthly power as well as an afterlife of pleasure – at least for Moslem males. The Koran makes no mention of what Moslem women will get in the next world, [030:060 URL] “So patiently persevere: for verily the promise of God is true: nor let those shake thy firmness, who have (themselves) no certainty of faith.

 

Time is on the Moslem side. Allah or Muhammad said so. They, it, him or 'we' referencing the Moslem plural also said the following violent phrases against the hated Infidel in Sura 30.  This includes Christians – Eastern Romans for example – who dared to 'associate partners' with Allah such as the Christian Trinity or the very existence of Christ. Christians are doomed. They have 'rejected' the unicity of Allah and his signs. The only ‘Faith’ is that of serving the Al Lah and his only apostle Muhammad. Polytheists are 'Zalimun' or criminals in Koranic theology, called ‘wrong-doers’ (30:29) as well.  They are Trinitarians. Christians are derided as polytheists.  Their fate is eternal damnation and torture.

 

030:010
* 
URL

In the long run evil in the extreme will be the End of those who do evil; for that they rejected the Signs of God, and held them up to ridicule.

030:011
* 
URL

It is God Who begins (the process of) creation; then repeats it; then shall ye be brought back to Him.

030:012
* 
URL

On the Day that the Hour will be established, the guilty will be struck dumb with despair.

030:013
* 
URL

No intercessor will they have among their "Partners" and they will (themselves) reject their "Partners".

030:015
* 
URL

Then those who have believed and worked righteous deeds, shall be made happy in a Mead of Delight.

030:016
* 
URL

And those who have rejected Faith and falsely denied our Signs and the meeting of the Hereafter, - such shall be brought forth to Punishment.

030:029
* 
URL

Nay, the wrong-doers (merely) follow their own lusts, being devoid of knowledge. But who will guide those whom God leaves astray? To them there will be no helpers.

030:042
* 
URL

Say: "Travel through the earth and see what was the end of those before (you): Most of them worshipped others besides God."

030:043
* 
URL

But set thou thy face to the right Religion before there come from God the Day which there is no chance of averting: on that Day shall men be divided (in two).

030:044
* 
URL

Those who reject Faith will suffer from that rejection: and those who work righteousness will spread their couch (of repose) for themselves (in heaven):

030:045
* 
URL

That He may reward those who believe and work righteous deeds, out of his Bounty. For He loves not those who reject Faith.

030:051
* 
URL

And if We (but) send a Wind from which they see (their tilth) turn yellow, - behold, they become, thereafter, Ungrateful (Unbelievers)!

030:052
* 
URL

So verily thou canst not make the dead to hear, nor canst thou make the deaf to hear the call, when they show their backs and turn away.

030:053
* 
URL

Nor canst thou lead back the blind from their straying: only those wilt thou make to hear, who believe in Our signs and submit (their wills in Islam).

030:055
* 
URL

On the Day that the Hour (of Reckoning) will be established, the transgressors will swear that they tarried not but an hour: thus were they used to being deluded!

 

The Muhammadan cult is particularly focused on the Day of Judgement.  Submit your will to the Al-Lah.  Allah will weigh the worth of each human.  The good Moslems will be rewarded. Everyone else is damned. The Christians in this Sura are blind, dumb, deaf, ignorant, and ungrateful rejecters of Muhammad's formula for 'faith'.  For their errors they will be 'punished', 'ridiculed', and sent to 'destruction'. There is no tolerance, peace and love for those outside of this cult. To say so is to embark on the most ludicrous journeys of opacity and dissimulation.

 

The Light Ages: A Medieval Journey of Discovery, by Seb Falk. Science and sphericity.

No, no one in the Medieval era believed that the Earth was Flat. Don't be ignorant.

Bookmark and Share

 

Secularists and Atheists, under the rubrics of various absurd philosophical categories such as ‘rationalism’, ‘humanism’, or ‘post-modernism’, words which mean nothing, engage in the most lurid examples of calumny when attempting to discredit Medieval Christianity.  They portray the era from 500 A.D. when their beloved pagan, slave-society, war-ridden, static, technology-deficient, artless, plutocratic, largely illiterate empire of Rome, ‘fell’ to Germanic occupation and the light of world civilisation flickered off until magically in 1500 A.D. the ‘Renaissance’ and the ‘Reformation’ popped up, out of nowhere, and ushered in the age of science, with such scientific luminosities as abiogenesis, witch-burnings, and revisionist history where such wondrous constructions as 12th century cathedrals are disparaged as ‘Gothic’ i.e. post Roman barbarities.  This is the basis of ‘Enlightenment’ propaganda.

 

Back in the real world, what was life really like in the Medieval period?  In reality, science, technology, mechanical clocks, polyphony, the violin and string instrumentation, art, book making (and printing), book translations, accounting, blast furnaces, flying buttresses, eye glasses, naturalism, international trade, banking, agricultural revolutions, windmills, watermills, metal saws, water pumps, exotic jewelling, military armaments, all whilst fighting Muslims, Magyars, Mongols, Avars, Vikings and heretical movements, probably indicates a pretty advanced, intelligent, confident, society, one based across Europe on Christian ideals and civilisation.

 

As Falk points out, science was built in the Medieval era.  Flying machines:

At Malmesbury Abbey, forty miles south and around eighty years earlier (ca 1250), a young monk named Eilmer had carried out an experimental flight. Inspired by the myth of Daedalus, he fastened wings to his hands and feet and leapt from a tall tower. According to the abbey chronicle, he flew more than two hundred metres, before a gust of wind caused him to fall and break his legs. He was lame for the rest of his life but survived well into old age.

So if we can believe the somewhat disapproving chronicler – who was one of the most reliable historians of his age – Eilmer piloted an experimental glider, not wholly without success, almost five hundred years before Leonardo da Vinci sketched a similar flying machine.

 

Computations and proper Calendaring:

And develop they did. Far from the stereotype of a stagnant scientific environment which did no more than preserve the ideas of the ancients, computists in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries continued to refine their astronomical models, with ever more accurate estimates of the solar and lunar cycles. Scholars became more outspoken in their criticism of the increasingly unrealistic ecclesiastical calendar. In the 1260s the Franciscan friar and proponent of empirical science Roger Bacon wrote, at the Pope’s request, a series of wide-ranging tracts on educational reform. In the third of these he condemned ‘the corruption of the calendar’. It was, he thundered, ‘intolerable to any wise person, horrible to any astronomer, and ridiculous to any computist’. Bacon accepted that only the Pope could change the centralised calendar but urged him to take action on this score. For Bacon, reform of the sciences was an essential part of defending Christendom against existential internal and external threats.

 

Monastic sciences:

the cloister itself was decorated to reflect the breadth of monastic learning, with windows depicting leading figures of the liberal arts. The windows included classical philosophers and poets, of course, but also medical thinkers, mathematicians like Pythagoras and Boethius, and Guido of Arezzo, the monk thought to have designed the hand mnemonic for musical theory. Geometry and astronomy were represented by the totemic Greek masters Euclid and Ptolemy, … symbolising the agriculture so important to the life of the monastery. Significant recent thinkers in law and theology – Jewish as well as Christian theology – had their own windows, showing that the monks could appreciate both new ideas and the achievements of non-Christians.

 

Universities first developed in Europe in the 11th century:

The universities did not appear out of nowhere but evolved after centuries of gradual development in monastic and cathedral schools, catalysed by the flood of translations … philosophical and scientific works in the twelfth century. We have already stepped into the monastic schools through the work of Bede, Hermann and others. The monks in those schools studied the seven liberal arts.

 

rhetoric and logic; and the quadrivium of mathematical sciences: arithmetic, geometry, music and astronomy. They were further popularised in the following century by Isidore, the long-serving bishop of Seville. Isidore gave a summary of the by-then-standard liberal arts at the opening of his encyclopaedia, The Etymologies. An ambitious attempt to summarise all human knowledge, The Etymologies was probably the most popular and influential book after the Bible throughout the Middle Ages.

 

Bologna, we have just seen, was a centre for law, while Padua and Montpellier rapidly acquired a reputation for medical training, especially as the pioneering school of Salerno declined in importance. Paris, true to its outgrowth from the cathedral schools, specialised in the third and greatest of the higher subjects: theology. Oxford, too, focused on theology, but there the lower faculty of liberal arts was more influential than in other universities. That helped it to attract leading masters of the trivium and, especially, the mathematical quadrivium.

 

No one believed the Earth was flat.

In a beautifully simple text, whose four chapters together are about the length of one chapter of this book, Sacrobosco set out the basics of medieval knowledge of the universe. He drew on a range of sources…but also quoted classical poets like Ovid and Virgil. He began with Euclid’s geometry, defining what a sphere is, and then described the spheres of the heavens and Earth. A consummate teacher, he built up layer on layer of complexity, explaining the varied motions of the stars and planets, the ways that day-lengths and stellar visibility depended on your location and the season, and how eclipses work.

All a myth:

We shall focus on Sacrobosco’s explanation that the Earth is round. Today it is widely assumed that medieval scholars thought the world was flat, but that is a myth largely invented in the nineteenth century. It was popularised in a work by Washington Irving that can be charitably called ‘imaginative history’, The Life and Voyages of Christopher Columbus, published in 1828. Irving pictured his hero, inspired by ‘natural genius’, arguing that it was possible to sail westward to the Indies, against fierce objections from ignorant churchmen at the Spanish court. Irving’s story was picked up by anti-religious writers and used as an emblem of a general conflict that they imagined was being waged between science and religion, in which a few brave individuals struggled against the suffocating power of the Church.  No such simplistic conflict existed. In fact, Columbus’ geographical assumptions were based on the work of a contemporary of John Westwyk, the Paris master and later cardinal Pierre d’Ailly, who himself drew heavily on Sacrobosco’s Sphere.

 

Evidence for sphericity:

As evidence for the earth’s roundness, Sacrobosco pointed out that the stars rise and eclipses occur at different times as you travel east or west. And as you travel north or south, he added, you see different stars altogether. If the earth was flat, he explained, the same stars would rise at the same time for all observers. It only seems flat, he said, ‘because of its great size’. Yet compared to the firmament, it must be infinitesimally small, since exactly half of the sky and stars are always above the horizon. The seas, like the earth, must also be round, since a lookout stationed at the top of a ship’s mast can see further than someone standing on deck. Also, Sacrobosco suggested logically, just as water droplets form beads on leaves, so the seas ‘naturally seek a round shape’. Aristotle had one more argument, which Sacrobosco did not use: whenever we watch a lunar eclipse, the Earth’s shadow on the Moon is always round

 

Based on sphericity one can measure circumference.

When Sacrobosco described, with his characteristic pithy clarity, how any student could carry out the calculation on a clear starry night, he cited Eratosthenes as an authority for his own estimate: 252,000 stades. Those 252,000 stades are extremely close to the correct value. Where did they come from? Not from precise measurement, but by a chain of educated guesses – that was all the Greek astronomers wanted.

 

There was plenty of intellectual activity in the middle ages, leading to the modern conceptions of education, astronomy, computations, geography, art, music, mechanics, and much, much more.  Denigrating the past because you hate Catholicism, or cannot stand Christianity, or truly believe rather mindless and baseless propaganda, is a sure way to deracinate the present from the past and extinguish your current civilisation.  Ignorance is just ignorance. 

 

Medieval Medicine and science. No, Moslems did not invent medicine. Christians did.

From Hospitals to Surgery.

Bookmark and Share

 

Without the Catholic and Christian ‘Middle Ages’, there would be no modern world.  Science, mathematics, naturalism, modern botany and medicine are all derived, directly, from medieval knowledge, practicality and technology.  Newton a devout Christian, stood on the shoulders of previous giants.  Pope Benedict XVI, ousted in a Vatican coup to install the insipid globalist Pope Francis, once state that to be a Christian, was to be someone who understood real history.  Sadly too many Christians and Catholics are ignorant about the past and allow Atheists and non-Christians to establish revisionist and erroneous themes.  Hospitals for example are a 2nd century Christian innovation.  By the 4th century Nestorian medical training centres are famous.  Few know this. 

 

Medicine is one area where the Christian legacy is disregarded or worse, degraded. Catholic historian Dave Armstrong summarises some aspects of Medieval medicine that would lead directly to its modern variant.  Some edits have been added.

 

…”(genesis of which is the) remarkable knowledge of the biblical writers regarding germ theory, which was basically only understood in science in the 19th century.

 

But did the hospitals in the Middle Ages actually have any effective treatments? Yes! Monks intensely studied and experimented medicinal properties of plants. This scenario — let’s not forget — produced Gregor Mendel, who discovered genetics in the 19th century, by studying peas. Healing herbs were widely available. Books of such herbal remedies were written by monks.

 

Translation of texts and curiosity to improve

In the 12th century, many medical texts from ancient Greece and Islamic medicine were translated into Latin, and the practices and treatments described therein began to be implemented. In the late 13th century, surgery — however primitive — greatly advanced and began to be practiced much more than formerly.

 

The practice of medicine in the early Middle Ages was empirical and pragmatic. It focused mainly on curing disease rather than discovering the cause of diseases. Often it was believed the cause of disease was supernatural. Nevertheless, secular approaches to curing diseases existed.

 

Evidence of pagan influence on emerging Christian medical practice was provided by many prominent early Christian thinkers, such as Origen, Clement of Alexandria, and Augustine, who studied natural philosophy and held important aspects of secular Greek philosophy that were in line with Christian thought.

 

Using natural medicine and extending trade routes

In exchanging the herbal texts among monasteries, monks became aware of herbs that could be very useful but were not found in the surrounding area. The monastic clergy traded with one another or used commercial means to obtain the foreign herbs. Inside most of the monastery grounds there had been a separate garden designated for the plants that were needed for the treatment of the sick. A serving plan of St. Gall depicts a separate garden to be developed for strictly medical herbals.

 

Monks and nuns also devoted a large amount of their time in the cultivation of the herbs they felt were necessary in the care of the sick. Some plants were not native to the local area and needed special care to be kept alive. The monks used a form of science, what we would today consider botany, to cultivate these plants. Foreign herbs and plants determined to be highly valuable were grown in gardens in close proximity to the monastery in order for the monastic clergy to hastily have access to the natural remedies.

 

Libraries, accretion of knowledge

The Middle Ages contributed a great deal to medical knowledge. This period contained progress in surgery, medical chemistry, dissection, and practical medicine. The Middle Ages laid the groundwork for later, more significant discoveries. There was a slow but constant progression in the way that medicine was studied and practiced. It went from apprenticeships to universities and from oral traditions to documenting texts. The most well-known preservers of texts, not only medical, would be the monasteries. The monks were able to copy and revise any medical texts that they were able to obtain.

 

Urban growth, Universities

Western Europe also experienced economic, population and urban growth in the 12th and 13th centuries leading to the ascent of medieval medical universities. The University of Salerno was considered to be a renowned provenance of medical practitioners in the 9th and 10th centuries, but was not recognized as an official medical university until 1231. . . . the Universities of Paris (1150), Bologna (1158), Oxford (1167), Montpelier (1181) and Padua (1222), extended the initial work of Salerno across Europe, and by the 13th century, medical leadership had passed to these newer institutions.

 

Moreover, Christians who were experimenting in (primitive but notable and relatively sophisticated) scientific techniques throughout the medieval period, were responsible for a host of new medical innovations. I cite a small representative sampling:

 

Paul of Aegina (c. 625 - c. 690) was perhaps the greatest Byzantine surgeon, and developed many novel surgical techniques and authored the medical encyclopedia Medical Compendium in Seven Books. The book on surgery in particular was a definitive treatise for hundreds of years.

 

Hunayn ibn Ishaq (809-873) [Nestorian]. His monumental developments on the eye are found in his innovative book, Ten Treatises on Ophthalmology — the first systematic book in this field. He explained in minute details, eye diseases and their symptoms and treatments. He accurately described cysts and tumors and wrote about how to treat various corneal ulcers through surgery; also about how to repair cataracts.

 

St. Hildegard von Bingen (1098-1179; Doctor of the Church) wrote botanical and medicinal texts.

 

Theodoric Borgognoni (1205-1298; bishop) He developed an antiseptic approach, with wounds being cleaned and sutured to promote healing. Bandages were pre-soaked in wine as a form of disinfectant. He promoted the use of anesthetics in surgery. A sponge soaked in a dissolved solution of opium, mandrake, hemlock, mulberry juice, ivy and other substances was held beneath the patient’s nose to induce unconsciousness.

 

The myths that atheists spread about medieval Christianity and science (including) are wild charges and simply unsubstantiated. It’s the same old tired saw of “Christianity — especially when it was the dominant cultural force — was supposedly anti-science, anti-intellectual, and opposed to the impulse and “curiosity” of investigative science or any other sort of learning.”

 

In addition to being a slander of historic Christianity (Catholicism and Orthodoxy), this is also an indefensible and reprehensible slander of the entire period of the Middle Ages. The inquiring, investigative, proto-scientific spirit of this innovative period is rarely examined in any depth or seriousness. Many atheists would rather caricature and broad-brush from a distance.

The Light Ages: A Medieval Journey of Discovery, by Seb Falk

St. Albans Monastery and the creation of the Mechanical Clock.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

 

 

The ‘Dark Ages’ as a term was first concocted by Plutarch in the 14th century.  The poorly named ‘humanists’, or ‘renaissance’ societies of Italy and elsewhere, looked past the medieval era, back to the Roman, to ‘rediscover’ ‘civilisation’.  This is about as intelligent as looking past Charles Babbage or the IBM ENIAC when discussing modern computing and dismissing both as ‘dark’, ‘uninformed’, and ‘superstitious’.  As with the modern era, the current ego and self-inflated importance of someone living off of other’s travails from past epochs is astounding.  If Plutarch’s forebears had not fought and often defeated the Muslims for example in various campaigns including the Crusades, would Plutarch have existed? 

 

Plutarch’s utopia was anything but.  The Roman empire was built on white-slavery (Do White Lives Matter?), 90% of the population would have been illiterate, close to poverty and without basic rights and freedoms; and most men would have been poor tradesmen, or employed in the army.  Outside of some engineering practices, technological advance was minimal, art and writing basic and simple most of it premised on existing Grecian forms.  It was a military fascism and over time corrupt, nepotistic, deranged and confused.  The Roman empire was not the idyll of sophistication portrayed by ‘humanist’ sympathisers.  It was a brutal iron-age empire, highly centralised, and only humanised by its general conversion to Christianity in 315 AD under Constantine.  Plutarch, the Enlightenment, the ‘sophisticated’ view of Rome is and was romanticised and fairly ignorant, not based on facts, but fancy. 

 

Back to the reality of the post-Roman world.  Times change and Europe was much better off without the dead weight of the Roman empire and military to carry.  Innovation proceeded aplenty, even as the Europeans fought endless wars against the Muslims, the Avars and Magyars, the Vikings and Mongols.  The ‘humanists’ and ‘enlightened’ thinkers wrongly and simplistically stated that a belief in God, meant a disavowal in progress, technology or invention.  This ignorant claim is rather shocking, especially from people who work to a clock or wear eye-glasses or used common household tools.

 

Naturalist science was created in the Medieval era, well developed by the time of the first universities (12 century):

But belief in God never prevented people from seeking to understand the world around them. Loyalty to texts and traditions never meant the rejection of new ideas. Channelling money and creative energies into religious art and architecture never restricted the range of medieval people’s interests. The relationship between faith and the study of nature was – and remains – a complex one…

 

For medieval people, study of the world – that is, the whole created cosmos – was a route to moral and spiritual wisdom. As Isaac Newton – hardly himself medieval, but standing on the shoulders of several medieval giants – wrote in an afterword to his monumental Principia mathematica, ‘thus much concerning God; to discourse of whom from the appearances of things, does certainly belong to Natural Philosophy’.

 

One of the greatest Christian medieval inventions amongst the hundreds that can be listed is the mechanical clock.  The clock is the foundation of modern work, the regulator of time and labour, the basis of productivity and production.  Only in Christian Europe is the mechanical clock invented and disseminated.  It is a key – but never mentioned reason – why European civilisation begins to dominate the world by 1500.  The clock allows time, effort and productive usage of both day and night to be implemented, measured, agreed upon in different locations and countries and is directly tied to naturalism, astronomy and mathematics. 

 

St. Albans’ 14th century masterpiece:

…world’s most advanced astronomical clock, set on a raised platform in the abbey church of St Albans...its inventor, Richard of Wallingford to be elected abbot in 1327, though its spiralling costs meant that it was still incomplete at his death – from leprosy – in 1336.

 

The mechanical clock was surely the most significant invention of the Middle Ages. Imagine our lives today without timekeeping.

 

…..(pre-dating St. Albans) a clock at Norwich Cathedral priory, surely mechanical, and records survive from the following decade of clocks in Dunstable, Exeter, London, Westminster and Oxford. Of all these clocks, not a single fragment survives. Again, and again we will see the irresistible medieval drive to tinker, to redesign, to incrementally improve or upgrade technology. When that happened, the attraction of reusing or recycling components – and the limitations of storage space – left little material evidence. Historians are dependent on descriptions, drawings and financial records.

 

Instead, what defines the mechanical clock – and excludes most of the water-based devices which had been used worldwide and developed over millennia – is its reliable, self-regulating driving mechanism. (I say ‘most’ because water-based clockwork mechanisms had been used to power astronomical devices in China for over three hundred years).

 

The genius of the clock at St. Albans would have been lost except:

North (English historian 1930s-1950s) dedicated much of his career to studying and publicising Wallingford’s work. The result of North’s research is that Wallingford … has been recognised as the greatest English astronomer of the later Middle Ages (though he is still hardly the household name he should be). Wallingford’s achievements signal the important role of monks in the story of science and remind us how religion and science went hand in hand. They also help explain why St Albans was such a centre for scientific study in the decades following his death…..

 

Such hour-striking is so familiar to us – albeit only from one to twelve – that it may seem trivial, but it required a clever piece of technology, which Wallingford invented: a barrel with pegs that released the striking mechanism and stopped it after the correct number of strokes.  The same principles of hour-striking, as well as a strob-type escapement, were used in designs sketched out 150 years later by Leonardo da Vinci, so it seems Wallingford’s ideas spread widely.

 

Could Plutarch or Gibbon invent a hour-striking mechanical clock?  Of course not.  Fat, insolent, self-absorbed, they invented nothing of note.  But the monks by the late 12th century in England did invent a masterpiece of engineering – something the mythologised Romans never bothered to attempt.  Slave societies don’t need clocks.  Societies which innovate, which have energy, which are creative, do.  And the monks of England were at the forefront of engineering science.  All modern sneers aside.

 

The corrupt Moslem-loving Communist party of America and its vote fraud machine

Dumb Joe Biden will simply accelerate the destruction of America

Bookmark and Share

 

 

(if legal-only votes are counted)

 

The unDemocratic Party and its Communist-Muslim agenda, is one of the most corrupt and immoral forces at work in the world today.  This party led by what can only be described as a 77-year-old criminal-mafia dumb-wit, is now stealing an election for the Presidency.  The vote-fraud is so obvious and so transparent, the intentions so clear and the malice and criminality so astonishing, that even the Fake News and the usual array of sneering leftist half-wits must have trouble not believing their lying eyes.  One would expect such an election in Venezuela not the USA.  It is still highly likely that Biden and his Moslem-open borders-Communist enterprise will still lose.  Riots, BLM, anti-fa destruction, violence, murder and mayhem will surely follow as the unDemocratic party sends its brownshirts into the streets.

 

The Fake News, the Communist Coup and assorted ‘big brains’ want the little peasant to believe that:

 

1-Hillary Clinton 2016: Won 65 million total votes with 8 million as fraud - her actual vote total was 57 million (2018 recount, she lost to Trump 70 million to 57 million).

 

2-Hussein Obama the first Moslem President 2008: 66 million votes at least 5 million fraudulent (a recount was not commissioned by the Dear Leader’s royal court).

 

3-Dumb, criminal, child-predator Biden who did not run a campaign:  70 million??

 

We can assume that 15 million votes for Biden are fraudulent.

 

Joe Biden did not fill a living room with supporters, Trump rallies numbered in the 50.000’s.  Yet we are to believe that Biden received more votes than Clinton or Obama, crushing both?  In what fantasy world does this play out?  Does the Communist party of America (the unDemocrats) really believe that people are this stupid?  Does its Deep State proxy and its Fake News propaganda outlets?  Are people really this inert and insipid?

 

Biden’s Communist Party has committed itself to opening the doors to Muslims.  It is already saturated with Muslim activists, some even though they are criminals elected to Congress (Omar), many in positions of power at the state and local levels.  This imitates what is going in Canada which under its Empress Trudeau, has declared an intention (during the period of Covid fascism) to import 400.000 more Muslims and Africans each year into a country of 35 million, to erase what the elite derisively call ‘old Canadian stock’.  Biden’s criminal party has opined the same.  Currently about 5 million Muslims reside in the USA (millions more illegally).  This will double under Biden to about 10 million (after 4 years of immigration and family reunifications).  This number will in turn double 5 years after that to about 20 million or double the current number of Muslims living in the UK.  In 40 years, Muslims will be 20% of the US population and will rip apart the fabric of the US as they do in every country they squat in. 

 

If Biden and the Communist Party win the Presidency, the decline of the USA, the acceleration of its Muslimification, and maybe its break-up is assured. 

 

Mein Koran. The origins of the Muslim fascism. This is why they hate and war.

Western half-wits if they are able to read, might want to read Sura 8 in Mein Koran.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

 

 

Western half-wits including most of the Catholic Church, are often puzzled by Muslim violence within and outside of the EUtopia.  They usually blame the victims.  So when Muslims riot in France and kill people, some half-wit ‘intellectual’ will blame the Crusades, even though Muslims had invaded Christian territory which was advanced, civilised and rich (Byzantium, North Africa, Visigoth Spain, Southern France), raping, slaughtering, killing and degrading civilised society, 400 years before the Crusades.  Or, they will opine that the actions of the French or Americans or insert country here in recent times made the Muslim Jihad in the Eutopia and Western World inevitable and justifiable which does not explain the Muslim destruction of Black Christians in Nigeria, the Sudan, East Africa, Iraq or Syria, or the Muslim slave ownership of Blacks and Hindus, nor the current Muslim war against Christian Armenia. 

 

Western half-wits have never read Mein Koran, or if they do, they rewrite it to fit their dogma and world-wide view which is anti-Catholic, anti-Western and increasingly racist against Whites and their civilisation.  For below-average IQs, Muslims squatting on richer territories or using the science, medicine and technology of the advanced societies they conquered is somehow a ‘golden age’.  In this vein, the half-wits argue that the current pandemic of Muslim hate, rage, violence and war is somehow the fault of the victims.  The French teacher Paty, who dared to show a cartoon about Muhammad in Paris, lost his head to an enraged, probably in-bred Muslim Ghazi and for many in the Fake News media, it was Paty and not the Muslim who was at fault. 

 

Maybe the half-wits should read Mein Koran and accept it at face value.  An example is Sura 8 – a very bloodthirsty chapter in Muhammad’s handbook of hate. 

 

Sura 8 or ‘The Spoils of War’, justifies the Moslem war on the Infidel including the rape of its women, the destruction of its property, the pillaging of its assets, and the taking of the 'spoils of war'.  This would include any assets in Western society that the Western squatting Muslim deems fit to be Jizya, or the tax which the Infidel must pay to the superior Muslim.

The attitude and muscular intolerance of this chapter, in which Moslems are commanded to denude the Infidel of their 'spoils' and wealth is nicely summarized by the moon-deity Hub'Allah's order: He wants his share. So does Muhammad.

 

8:41: And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allahand to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad SAW)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masakin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allah and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad SAW) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) - And Allah is Able to do all things.

 

Pretty clear. At the battle of Badr in 624 AD the smaller Moslem force was victorious against the Meccans. They took to looting the baggage train of the defeated forces. This 'revelation' conveniently justifies this post-battle plundering. Yet we are told constantly by the media and political elite that Islam is love and inter-faith understanding. Sura 8 is never quoted by these same big-brains, nor by Moslems themselves.

 

Out of 75 verses in Chapter 8, there are only 33 which could be classified as hate speech under existing hate speech laws in Western countries. A favourite is surely this catchy phrase 8:39:

And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily Allah sees all that they do.

 

Verse 8:17 states that even though Muslims will kill the Infidel (a duty of Jihad); that it is really the moon deity Baal or the Al-Lah who is doing the killing.  This means that the Muslim should not feel guilty or bad.  He is simply a tool of the Al Lah and the moon deity is very happy killing Christians, Jews and non-Muslims.  So Muslims go on and kill at will.

 

The Al-Lah moon deity gives Moslems full rights to kill and slaughter the Infidel.  It is an obligation.  Sura 8 states that Moslems must fight on until the House of War (the Infidels) is subdued. This is what is meant by 'no more tumult or oppression'. The existence of Infidels and deniers of the Allah cult is simply insufferable to the pious Moslem. The Allah-thing's commandment is clear – every human must be in bondage and submission to the moon deity, or to the cult of Muhammad.

 

The bubbling, boiling, raging hatred against those who do not follow the Hub'Al[lah] cult of Mecca finds a crescendo within Sura 8. The 33 which demand violence against the Infidel loser are as follows:

 

008:001
* 
URL

They ask you (O Muhammad SAW) about the spoils of war. Say: "The spoils are for Allah and the Messenger." So fear Allah and adjust all matters of difference among you, and obey Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad SAW), if you are believers.

008:006
* 
URL

Disputing with you concerning the truth after it was made manifest, as if they were being driven to death, while they were looking (at it).

008:007
* 
URL

And (remember) when Allah promised you (Muslims) one of the two parties (of the enemy i.e. either the army or the caravan) that it should be yours, you wished that the one not armed (the caravan) should be yours, but Allah willed to justify the truth by His Words and to cut off the roots of the disbelievers (i.e. in the battle of Badr).

008:012
* 
URL

(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."

008:013
* 
URL

This is because they defied and disobeyed Allah and His Messenger. And whoever defies and disobeys Allah and His Messenger, then verily, Allah is Severe in punishment.

008:014
* 
URL

This is the torment, so taste it, and surely for the disbelievers is the torment of the Fire.

008:015
* 
URL

O you who believe! When you meet those who disbelieve, in a battle-field, never turn your backs to them.

008:016
* 
URL

And whoever turns his back to them on such a day - unless it be a stratagem of war, or to retreat to a troop (of his own), - he indeed has drawn upon himself wrath from Allah. And his abode is Hell, and worst indeed is that destination!

008:017
* 
URL

You killed them not, but Allah killed them. And you (Muhammad SAW) threw not when you did throw but Allah threw, that He might test the believers by a fair trial from Him. Verily, Allah is All-Hearer, All-Knower.

008:019
* 
URL

(O disbelievers) if you ask for a judgement, now has the judgement come unto you and if you cease (to do wrong), it will be better for you, and if you return (to the attack), so shall We return, and your forces will be of no avail to you, however numerous it be, and verily, Allah is with the believers.

008:022
* 
URL

Verily! The worst of (moving) living creatures with Allah are the deaf and the dumb, those who understand not (i.e. the disbelievers).

008:030
* 
URL

And (remember) when the disbelievers plotted against you (O Muhammad SAW) to imprison you, or to kill you, or to get you out (from your home, i.e. Makkah); they were plotting and Allah too was planning, and Allah is the Best of the planners.

008:033
* 
URL

And Allah would not punish them while you (Muhammad SAW) are amongst them, nor will He punish them while they seek (Allah's) Forgiveness.

008:036
* 
URL

Verily, those who disbelieve spend their wealth to hinder (men) from the Path of Allah, and so will they continue to spend it; but in the end it will become an anguish for them. Then they will be overcomed. And those who disbelieve will be gathered unto Hell.

008:037
* 
URL

In order that Allah may distinguish the wicked (disbelievers, polytheists and doers of evil deeds) from the good (believers of Islamic Monotheism and doers of righteous deeds), and put the wicked (disbelievers, polytheists and doers of evil deeds) one on another, heap them together and cast them into Hell. Those! it is they who are the losers.

008:038
* 
URL

Say to those who have disbelieved, if they cease (from disbelief) their past will be forgiven. But if they return (thereto), then the examples of those (punished) before them have already preceded (as a warning).

008:039
* 
URL

And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do.

008:048
* 
URL

And (remember) when Shaitan (Satan) made their (evil) deeds seem fair to them and said, "No one of mankind can overcome you this Day (of the battle of Badr) and verily, I am your neighbour (for each and every help)." But when the two forces came in sight of each other, he ran away and said "Verily, I have nothing to do with you. Verily! I see what you see not. Verily! I fear Allah for Allah is Severe in punishment."

008:050
* 
URL

And if you could see when the angels take away the souls of those who disbelieve (at death), they smite their faces and their backs, (saying): "Taste the punishment of the blazing Fire."

008:052
* 
URL

Similar to the behaviour of the people of Fir'aun (Pharaoh), and of those before them; they rejected the Ayat (proofs, verses, etc.) of Allah, so Allah punished them for their sins. Verily, Allah is All-Strong, Severe in punishment.

008:054
* 
URL

Similar to the behaviour of the people of Fir'aun (Pharaoh), and those before them. They belied the Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.), of their Lord, so We destroyed them for their sins, and We drowned the people of Fir'aun (Pharaoh) for they were all Zalimun (polytheists and wrong-doers, etc.).

008:055
* 
URL

Verily, The worst of moving (living) creatures before Allah are those who disbelieve - so they shall not believe.

008:057
* 
URL

So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.

008:059
* 
URL

And let not those who disbelieve think that they can outstrip (escape from the punishment). Verily, they will never be able to save themselves (from Allah's Punishment).

008:060
* 
URL

And make ready against them all you can of power, including steeds of war to threaten the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and others besides whom, you may not know but whom Allah does know. And whatever you shall spend in the Cause of Allah shall be repaid unto you, and you shall not be treated unjustly.

008:065
* 
URL

O Prophet (Muhammad SAW)! Urge the believers to fight. If there are twenty steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do not understand.

008:066
* 
URL

Now Allah has lightened your (task), for He knows that there is weakness in you. So if there are of you a hundred steadfast persons, they shall overcome two hundred, and if there are a thousand of you, they shall overcome two thousand with the Leave of Allah. And Allah is with As-Sabirin (the patient ones, etc.).

008:069
* 
URL

So enjoy what you have gotten of booty in war, lawful and good, and be afraid of Allah. Certainly, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful.

008:070
* 
URL

O Prophet! Say to the captives that are in your hands: "If Allah knows any good in your hearts, He will give you something better than what has been taken from you, and He will forgive you, and Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful."

008:071
* 
URL

But if they intend to betray you (O Muhammad SAW), they have already betrayed Allah before. So He gave (you) power over them. And Allah is All-Knower, All-Wise.

008:072
* 
URL

Verily, those who believed, and emigrated and strove hard and fought with their property and their lives in the Cause of Allah as well as those who gave (them) asylum and help, - these are (all) allies to one another. And as to those who believed but did not emigrate (to you O Muhammad SAW), you owe no duty of protection to them until they emigrate but if they seek your help in religion, it is your duty to help them except against a people with whom you have a treaty of mutual alliance, and Allah is the All-Seer of what you do.

008:073
* 
URL

And those who disbelieve are allies to one another, (and) if you (Muslims of the whole world collectively) do not do so (i.e. become allies, as one united block with one Khalifah - chief Muslim ruler for the whole Muslim world to make victorious Allah's Religion of Islamic Monotheism), there will be Fitnah (wars, battles, polytheism, etc.) and oppression on earth, and a great mischief and corruption (appearance of polytheism).

008:074
* 
URL

And those who believed, and emigrated and strove hard in the Cause of Allah (Al-Jihad), as well as those who gave (them) asylum and aid; - these are the believers in truth, for them is forgiveness and Rizqun Karim (a generous provision i.e. Paradise).

008:075
* 
URL

And those who believed afterwards, and emigrated and strove hard along with you, (in the Cause of Allah) they are of you. But kindred by blood are nearer to one another regarding inheritance in the decree ordained by Allah. Verily, Allah is the All-Knower of everything.

 

Very Manichean and violent indeed. Non-Moslems are to be fought against. If they repent and convert then the Allah-thing might forgive them [for he is all-knowing and merciful]. If non-Moslems help Moslems in battle with their enemies they might also be 'saved' by the Allah. The whole thrust is this: our cult is superior and will be victorious. If you do not believe in our cult and its idol the Hub'Allah we Moslems have every right, as we did after the battle of Badr, to take our just 'spoils' of war including money, property and women. Allah wants us to do this for he is all-powerful, all-wise....

 

Charlie Hebdo and Muslim Fascism

Importing Bronze Age savages into Western States has led to Civil War.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

 (Erdogan imitating the Totalitarian and Sex addicted Muhammad)

 

A French Teacher is slaughtered, beheaded, by a Muslim fanatic in Paris, who took exceptional umbrage with the Teacher showing a Charlie Hebdo cartoon mocking the ‘Prophet’ of Islam – a man who raped a 9 year old, had 20 odd sex slaves (his favourite was the White Coptic Mary), slaughtered, killed, murdered and waged Jihad to establish his power.  A profiteer and brigand not a prophet.  If Muhammad was a saintly prophet so too were Stalin, Mao and Hitler, all of whom created equally savage, atavistic and primitive cults of power and totalitarian control.  Yet most of the Western world will not learn from yet another Muslim Jihad attack, why the Teacher’s head was removed (Sura 47:4), nor why the Muslim fanaticism and will-to-rule finds violent expression every week in Western states in Jihad, rape gangs, crime and gang violence.

 

The French to their credit did respond, closing down the Mosque which advocated the killing of the Teacher, and rooting out ‘extremist’ ‘Islamists’ and their organisations.  Predictably, post this latest attack and valid French response, many Moslem states want to take action against France, some Imams calling for an armed Jihad invasion of the country, with the more limp-wristed moaning about limiting free speech which criticises the moon cult of Muhammad (the aptly named Egyptian Muslim President Sisi is an example of such effeminate moaning).  This is always the reaction of Muslims.  The problem is that the EUtopia now contains some 50 million of them, (10% of the population), 10 million squat in France, a similar amount to what litters the UK some 7-10 million (legal and illegal, in a population of 70 million), in North America we find all over the vast Continent some 10 million and in Australia and New Zealand a further 2 million.  All of these populations will double in the next 10 years, assuming that the Covid-fascism does not implode Western society first into a dystopian Covid-totalitarianism which may render the welfare cheques that 70% of Muslims live on, parlous and inadequate leading to self-deportation (which should be a key strategy in removing Muslims from Western states ie turn off the welfare to the vast Muslim unemployed). 

 

Islam has been at war with the Western civilised world for 1400 years.  It seeks the complete eradication of Christianity, Western culture and non-Moslem artifacts and thought.  It demands submission to itself and its profiteer Muhammad, hence the name Islam or Submission.  Al Lah is not God but the Lord of Mecca who was Baal and Muhammad’s family were Baal’s caretakers. 

 

Within Muslim jurisprudence, formed by Sharia which is not a law but a set of totalitarian principles on how to obey the Muslim state the following are truisms:

 

1.     There is no free speech in Islam

2.     There is no criticism of anything to do with Islam.

3. One cannot even mildly demur against Muhammad (remindful of Solzhenitsyn being sent to the gulag for joking about Stalin during WW2).

4.     There is no equality of the female in Islam.  The woman is a chattel of the man.

5.     A man can have up to 4 wives and unlimited sex slaves (Infidels) in Muhammad’s cult.

6.     Rational enquiry is entirely discouraged.

7.     There can be no amendments to Mein Koran.

8.     No other book, or conceptual philosophy or theology, can be offered to replace or amend Mein Koran.

9.  Mein Koran contains all the Truth, laws, and societal obligations necessary for all people.

10. Islam by its Jihadic core, is a supremacist and universalist fascism, never accommodating, only destroying any rival philosophy or social construct.

 

The problem the West now has, beyond the Covid-totalitarianism, is that the great ‘replacement’ of largely secular, egotistical, and indifferent Western populations by Muslims and Africans has proceeded to such a level, that most Western governments will appease Muslims and Muslim states, in order to forego and pre-empt local and national Muslim intifadas.  By importing the Muslim Bronze-age and its totalitarian creed, our own civilisation has chosen suicide.

 

 

 

An Iraqi Archbishop states the obvious about the cultural suicide of the EUtopia

Destroy your heritage and culture and watch your civilisation disappear.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

The Iraqi Archbishop fully understands the European suicide, its willing submission to the racist-totalitarian-supremacist cult of Muhammad.  His remarks are below, apposite and will be ignored, especially by European churches, who will do everything to defend the onslaught of the Muslim Jihad and the eradication of their own Christian culture, in favour of the Muhammadan non-culture.  To say that the Christian Churches in Europe are largely effete and useless is just to point out the obvious. 

In any European urban area, you will find 70% of adult Muslims who are unemployed.  There is now record crime across Europe, record rapes, Jihad attacks, public violence, Churches including Notre Dame arsoned, defaced, or vandalised.  The Muslims in Europe – some 50 million of them – now constitute almost 10% of the population.  This will double in 15 years.  The civil war or intifada will simply accelerate.  Muslim violence, hate, and the war against the ‘Infidel’ is on plain view for anyone in Europe to see.  You just need an IQ above 80 to comprehend what is going on by looking at the world of the 5 senses.

The Low IQs will of course blame Muslim rapes, crime, violence, beheadings of Infidels, Church-attacks and anti-Jewish racism and anti-Christian Christophobia, on ‘racism’, though Muhammadanism is not a race but a cult, and Muhammad was a white man who owned Black male slaves and Black Female chattel in his harem.  These facts are disregarded by the ignorant.  Muslims rape white women, they target White women, they openly proclaim that White women are ‘easy meat’, this in itself is an act of racism.  Muslims are not raping Blacks, or Asians en masse, just Whites.

 

Iraqi Archbishop Moussa says the obvious:

“My first lesson is that of faith. Islamism fills a void, an emptiness. In the East, we often look at Europe with envious eyes. But we have retained natural values: the defense and promotion of the family, living faith, pride in our identities and our roots. All things that I see slowly disappearing in Europe. I said it in the European Parliament: “I am more afraid for Europe than I am for Iraq”. Here, in some ways, we have lost everything; here, you neglect the importance of your treasures, your cultures, your civilization. And you sometimes give way to fundamentalist or Salafist movements that gradually impose their ideologies on those around them, to become bearers of hatred and disrespect for the countries that welcome them.

This approach must be the first. Secondly, one would have to be short-sighted not to see that Europe is naive in the face of terrorism and uncontrolled and unattended immigration. As a human and Christian, I believe in the primordial place of the neighbor and to immerse it. They will always find in me the heart of a brother who loves them. I am also in love with European cultures: they will always find in me a friend who advises them. Not all these people come to love you, or to serve the countries that welcome them. If you do not control and fight the outlaws, and those who refuse the values of your country and human rights, and impose their own laws, you will lose your way of life, your culture, your peace. For Catholics, naivety is not charity, prudence is. It is indispensable to have an eye for love, and an eye for prudence, this is how you are invited to look at migration.

As for terrorism, if you do not make it disappear by law and firmness, it is you and your children who are exposed to the danger of kneeling….”

 

Stop the Muslim invasion of Europe.

Close all Mosques preaching hate and Jihad.

Deport Muslims who are unemployed.

Stop ‘family’ reunification.

Turn off the welfare system to Muslims and invaders.

Rebuild Europe, to be European again.

 

 

Muslims slaughtering Black Christians in Nigeria in a 200 year old Jihad.

Black Christian Lives do matter.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

 

Raymond Ibrahim’s September update on the Muslim Jihad and murder of Christians.  I don’t recall Muslims kneeling asking for forgiveness, or BLM burning, looting and murdering over the 5.000 Black Christians in Nigeria, killed on average every year for the past 20 years, by Black Muslims. 

 

“Among the dozens of other Christians killed by Muslim Fulani herdsmen in September were two young Christian girls and a 6-year-old boy (September 28); a 64-year-old Christian community leader and seven other Christians (September 21); a Christian woman and her son, working on their farm (September 23); and five other Christians (September 24).

Discussing the plight of Nigerian Christians in a September 16 statement, the Catholic bishops of Kaduna Province said that "dark clouds of violence have enveloped our land. Our country is in the firm grip of the grim reaper." For over a decade, Nigeria's main challenge was the Islamic terrorist group Boko Haram, the statement said, though the military had largely degraded two years ago..

Fr. Sam Ebute, who serves one of the persecuted communities, gave a more personalized take:

"For four years, since I became a priest in 2016, I have been burying my parishioners. In 2017, I had to bury a woman who had been killed along with her four children at night, in Tachira. In 2018, in Tsonje, the parish had to also bury four people who were killed. In 2019, in Zunruk, seven youths were killed in broad day light while playing soccer."

More recently, in late July of this year, Fr. Sam buried 21 other Christians from his flock, most of them young girls:

"So, for the past seven weeks, we have been burying our parishioners with no end in sight. These last attacks have left us all in fear and especially the fear of the unknown because we do not know when the next round of attacks will happen and what will trigger it.”

 

There is no reporting on this whatsoever, none, from the Western Fake News media.  If a report does appear, it identifies ‘sectarian conflict’ between tribes.  Anything to excuse, justify, or ignore the Muslim Jihad.  For the Fake News and ‘Experts’, the anti-Christian bigots, the mentally-deranged Leftists, Black Christian Lives do not matter.  The Christocide does not matter.  The eradication of civilisation by Muhammad’s Bronze Age cult does not matter.  BLM, anti-fa and their supporters are illiterate and hypocritical Marxists, who don’t have a clue about the real world.

 

 

The Age of Plunder, by W. G. Hoskins

Henry VIII and the Destruction of the English Catholic Church

Bookmark and Share

 

 

 

 

English history has largely been revised, rewritten and terribly distorted by Protestants and Atheists.  In this reforming of facts, Henry VIII is often portrayed in the opposite vein of his real persona: a ‘manly’ King, a true leader, a personality which did not damage his country but immensely improved it.  This myopic and dishonest assessment is taken apart by Hoskins.  Henry VIII at some point (mid-20s) became mentally imbalanced; he killed tens of thousands of Catholics in the largest transfer of resources in history, rightly called by Hoskins as the great Plunder (until 1991 and the end of Soviet Communism, when the new Communists in Russia appropriated all of the natural resources).  His daughter killed at least 10.000 Catholics, her half-sister Queen Mary who preceded her, burnt 300 Protestants who were mainly charged with treason and plotting civil war.  Mary is of course the ‘Bloody’ one in history because she was Catholic.  Henry and his daughter Elizabeth, the golden children of the ‘golden age’ because they were Protesters and Tyrants, not bloody at all apparently but angelic and ‘progressive’.

 

Hoskins quotes Thomas More who appropriately sums up the Plundering tyranny of Henry VIII during the 1520s and 1530s:

THERE is a pregnant sentence in More’s Utopia, written when he was a mature and widely experienced man of thirty-eight, which sums up his judgment of the realities that lay behind the facade of government and public attitudes: ‘When I consider and weigh in my mind all these commonwealths which nowadays anywhere do flourish, so God help me, I can perceive nothing but a certain conspiracy of rich men procuring their own commodities under the name and title of the commonwealth.’ This profound truth remains undiluted in twentieth-century Britain, and is equally well disguised from public debate.

 

The mental derangement of the tyrant King Henry VIII (murdered wives and all that):

While Henry lived, men rightly feared his ferocity. His arbitrary executions, his ‘state trials’, remind one inevitably of Stalin’s Russia: he was indeed the Stalin of Tudor England.  But until his second daughter, Elizabeth, died, and with her the last of the Tudors, men dared not speak freely about his loathsome character. It was left to Sir Walter Raleigh, himself under sentence of death in the Tower under James I, to sum him up….

 

Henry VIII was an economic disaster for England:

To put it simply, Henry VIII inherited a healthy trading position from his father, besides an immense personal fortune, and squandered all his inheritance in foreign wars and madly extravagant building at home. He was, apart from all else, an economic disaster for his country.

 

The small population base made a general plundering of the masses considerably difficult:

For England and Wales together we may estimate a total of about 2,600,000 people. This tiny population still reflected by and large the distribution of medieval times. If we take the absolute totals of the listed men — archers, billmen, and those able to supply harness — and after all this is what the government was interested in, and not in refinements such as the numbers of able-bodied men per square mile, the outstanding fact is that the three eastern counties of Norfolk, Suffolk and Essex were as a whole the most densely peopled part of England.

 

Henry VIII’s megalomaniacal spending and warring, bankrupted England:

 

Perhaps it is best to sum it up by saying that Dietz reckons that the total cost of the wars with France and Scotland between 1511 and 1547 amounted to £2,134,784, Scotland alone costing some £350,000. And still nothing was solved by this egomaniac. Even his so-called ‘victories’ proved to be nonsense: the capture of Boulogne in 1544 cost nearly £600,000 and hanging on to it afterwards another £400,000 odd — a million pounds expended on one useless military endeavour. Wars were now costing far more than in the recent past, due not only to a slight monetary inflation but also to their growing scale. When another war loomed up, that of 1542-46, Cromwell knew beforehand that it would surpass all previous wars in costs: and so it did.

 

But Henry VIII still massively taxed his largely agrarian, low-density population base to fund his wars:

The massive taxation of the 1520s had been soon wasted. Still more revenue was needed despite the rising popular discontent, brought to a climax by the official repudiation in 1529 of the Loan of 1522.

 

The great mass of people owned little or no land, and possessed but a tiny fraction of the goods of the kingdom. Whether land was more unequally distributed than goods is impossible to determine, or whether this gross inequality in the distribution of wealth was more marked by the end of the sixteenth century than at the beginning. One thing, however, is certain: the century was a golden age for the Shearers, not to be paralleled until the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries (by shearers, Hoskins is referring to the plunderers, shearing the peasants as one would a sheep).

 

When the peasants could no longer be squeezed dry, the Church loomed as the most obvious target of plunder.

The Church owned 27.3 per cent of the temporal freehold income, the peerage 8.6 per cent, the Crown 9 per cent, and the gentry 55 per cent. We have no direct information about freeholders other than the gentry, except at a slightly later date and from a somewhat dubious source — the lay subsidy assessments of 1546.

 

Church owned just about one-fifth of the wealth of England at the time. From the Crown’s point of view the county totals are the figures that mattered, so let us accept them for the moment at their face value. Kent was by far the richest county in England, even more so if we could reckon in the Cinque Ports. Once again the eastern counties proper stand very high, Norfolk in second place, Essex third, and Suffolk sixth. Wiltshire emerges as the fourth richest, Devon as fifth. The ranking of 1524-25 is somewhat different because the tax figures take in the multitude of people assessed at less than £2 in worldly goods and there we find Devon ranking second to Kent, with Norfolk, Essex and Suffolk next in order.

 

London then as now, the parasite eating the hosts found in the hinterland, the court in London viewing the extremities of the kingdom as little more than food, in an economy that was 90% national, not internationally based:

 

This metropolitan illusion persists strongly to this day; yet even in the late twentieth century the provinces remain the industrial and agricultural strength of Britain, and London largely a grey and inflated parasite on them. It is probable that the coastal and inland trades were worth at least ten times as much as all the overseas trades put together, and very likely considerably more in the first half of the sixteenth century. We have no statistical evidence in this field before Gregory King’s analysis of the English economy in the late seventeenth century, when he estimated the total national product at £50.8 million and exports at £4.3 million, or about 8.5 per cent of total production. In other words, only one-twelfth of the total production of the country entered into foreign trade even at this date.

 

During the 1530s and 1540s over 70% of Church lands were transferred to the Court of Henry VIII.  The court worthies helped themselves to the plunder.  Usually the takeover was done under the disguise of a ‘lawful court of augmentations’, where the appropriated land was ‘sold’ to the court worthy at a low cost.  This worthy might then re-sell it to another to make a profit, or use the land and its associated rents and economy to build his own fortune.  Of course, the more powerful of the court members would help themselves to more than 1 estate.  Monasteries were torn down (at least 1000 were destroyed), art, libraries, books and treasure either stolen, resold, burnt or abandoned.  Thousands of religious forced to flee or exit the Church altogether.

 

Court of Augmentations already skilled in manipulating monastic property in their own interests. The next step followed quickly: a demand from the King that the lands so leased be exchanged for some ex-monastic property. The King then handed over the lands to some officer like Sir Edward North, treasurer of the Court of Augmentations (later promoted chancellor) who promptly resold at a high profit to another predator. It was a shameless land-racket in which, as Cranmer wrote in 1546, it was not even the King who gained but the people who surrounded him.

 

Was the real point to annul his marriage to Catherine of Aragon so he could marry the demonic harlot Ann Boleyn?  Or was it simply to pay for wars, spending, and combine Church and State to his own authority?  Or was it also just to enrich himself, as an older, fat, demented, confused ogre?

Henry’s total income from land was well over £40,000 towards the end of his reign. Out of this he accumulated the largest fortune ever known in England, which he left to his profligate and disastrous son.

 

Don’t expect to find much criticism in the current revisionist historical literature on Henry VIII or his daughter. 

 

 

Michael Wood's 'In Search of The Dark Ages'. Plenty of light, the basis of civilisation

Without the Catholic Church there is no civilisation.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

 

Michael Wood’s ‘In Search of the Dark Ages’, focuses on England.  According to Atheist and Protestant propaganda, all was dark, miserable, deformed and ugly in the Christian West, when the White-slave-built Roman empire rightly and finally perished, until the magical explosion of ‘science’, ‘art’ and ‘medicine’ in 1520, generated from the ‘Reformation’. 

 

This benighted and illiterate view of reality in turn gives rise to the myth of the Moslem golden age – a cult whose empire much impressed the Protestants, later Atheists and the Romantic and ‘Humanist’ movements.  This inimical, ridiculous and dangerous rewriting of history has now led to a society who firmly believes that the Church which funded invention, technology, art, science, mathematics and naturalism, was the enemy of progress.  The Muslim cult which did not invent anything including algebra and the astrolabe; the progenitors of the modern world along with Protestants.  Without the Catholic Church there is no civilisation.  Paganism in any form – Roman, Greek, Muslim, Nazi, does not lead to ‘progress’ but to stasis, slavery and self-destruction.

 

In Michael Wood’s very good book on the ‘Dark Ages’ in England he dismisses the claim that they were dark, with ‘dark’, usually viewed in the modern lens as dense, stupid, uncivilised, barbaric, without culture, refinement, art, education, ‘science’ and society.  Sutton Hoo archaeology reveals the 6th century to be one of great wealth, trade, art and rebuilding, not just of war and invasion.  The golden court of Athelstan in the early 10th century rivalled that of another great Christian court in the 9th century that of Charlemagne in France.  Sundry inventions led to the ‘agricultural revolution’ of the 9th century, regarded as important in human development as the Industrial Revolution of the 18th century which was also formed, built and invented by Christians. 

 

The Church in England was gifted with land from the Normans and before them the Anglo-Saxon King Alfred and his successors Edward and Athelstan who was the first true King of England.  The land became studded with impressive structures many of which housed public schools, hospices, hospitals, clinics and of course scriptoriums which kept alive the ancient teachings and knowledge and associated libraries – many burnt by pagans such as the Vikings, and later on Protestants and Atheists.  A fact you won’t hear much of in academia today.  The first universities were developed around monastic institutions.  It is rather curious that modern eyeglass wearing academics are so dismissive of the medieval Church.  Eyeglasses were invented by Catholics in the 11th century.  Universities in the 12th.  I suppose they don’t understand irony.

 

Politically, the entire modern conception of democracy, ‘rights’ and responsibilities, division of powers, Parliament, freedom, private property ownership, and the use of law over violence to resolve grievances, emanates from the Medieval period.  There is no disputing this.  In England, this is clearly stated as far back as 1086 in the Norman’s ‘Domesday book’, or a record of every asset in England:

 

“…in Domesday Book. In fact the survey of 1086 was in the Old English and Carolingian traditions, and the mechanisms which made it possible were in existence by 940. Recent work on Domesday Book has shown that the Conqueror’s surveyors relied not only on the sworn testimony of the local juries but on written material, ‘ancient rolls in the royal treasury still preserved with the [Domesday] survey of all England’ as a twelfth-century historian put it. These ‘Winchester rolls’ may have gone back as far as Athelstan’s day.”

 

In other words, the well-built Anglo-Saxon state had the attributes of a modern state, making a collection of assets and wealth possible.  In no other country in Europe was this attempted.  The Normans were able to assemble the Domesday book because the country was so well organised, socially and politically.  It was not ‘dark’ and uneducated or moronic.  But highly logical, social, developed and advanced.

 

“Politically, it has been said, the Normans were masters of their world. But the foundations of their England were Anglo-Saxon. Just as Domesday Book can be seen as a product of the Old English system of local government and the Old English royal administration, so the England it portrays is Anglo-Saxon England, the society built up on the ruins of Rome over 500 years and decisively shaped by Offa, Alfred, Athelstan and the others. It was, for its time, a remarkably unified country (at least south of the Humber) with a vernacular literature unmatched in Europe, a standardised form of Old English, and sophisticated machinery of government, chancery, coinage and law.”

 

The end result of the Medieval ages is the creation of the Modern.  Without the Catholic Church there is no modern world.  None.  Greece, Rome, Islam – all slave empires which did not produce the quota of inventions, ideas and structures which led from the ancient to the Modern. 

 

“It had created, too, under royal patronage, a great Christian Latin culture whose artists included the anonymous masters of the wonderful books from eighth-century Northumbria or late tenth-century Winchester and Ramsey. In Bede it not only produced the greatest historian of the Middle Ages, but the thinker who perhaps more than any other gave form to the identity of the English people, the gens Anglorum. This idea we can trace through Alfred’s preface to the Pastoral Care, Althelstan’s laws, and the Anglo-Saxon chronicler of Ethelred’s day with his identification with the English people as a whole, eall Angel cynn.”

 

In today’s un-Enlightened world, truth is a thought crime.  The pagan empires including Islam and to a lesser extent Rome, retarded and corrupted civilisation.  Only the Church, in the most difficult eras imaginable, beset by social collapse (Rome failing); the invasions of the Huns, Magyars, Moslems and Vikings; stood fast and strong against the tide of uncivilised barbarism, creating magnificence that astounds the modern tourist today.  It is not an accident that the Blast Furnace was invented in Christian Europe in the 11th and 12th centuries.  No other civilisation provided the belief, the certainty, the rationality, the confidence to develop such technology.  Tearing that culture down, depreciating it, mocking it, ignoring it, flailing it, will mean the end of Western Civilisation. 

 

 

Medieval Medicine and science. No, Moslems did not invent medicine.

Catholic Christianity invented everything from Hospitals to Tooth fillings.

Bookmark and Share

Many myths abound about the Medieval period. The lies spread by Atheists, and pro-Moslems are not only in the main quite ludicrous, but also extraordinarily ignorant. When you hear them, you wonder if the speaker possesses any sentience whatsoever. One persistent myth is that there was no 'medicine', or that it was 'imported' from those fantastically capable and alert Moslems, an often-stated mendacity, that titillates the Church haters. Moslems in the atheist-Marxist worldview are the supposed progenitors of all that is civilized. This is why the Moslem world today is such a paradise of plurality and prosperity of course. 

 

In fact medieval medicine as found in Christendom was almost entirely a local-regional phenomenon based on what today is termed 'homeopathy', and on natural 'holistic' principles, now in vogue, but standard practice from 800-1500 AD. It was decidedly superior to Moslem methods, which relied almost exclusively on failed Greek ideals, perpetuated by Galen, who unfortunately still had a lot of followers in Medieval Europe as well. Few real Moslem creations in medicine were unique, or of much use. And those which were, always emanated from converts.

 

Christendom invented hospitals, and medical research. This is a simple fact. These institutions date back to the 3rd century AD, or some 300 years before the madness of Muhammad's cult and Jihad began. The Nestorian hospital complexes, which were the largest in the world by the time of the Moslem Jihad, were centres of learning and research as well as care for the ill. But these centres were resident all across Europe by 700 AD. Monasteries and priories across the width and breadth of Europe, during the non-existent 'dark age' [a reference to modern cults perhaps], were active and free, sustained by Church tithes and the donations of the rich.

 

Starting from the 3rd century, medicine advanced in leaps and bounds over Greco-Roman illiteracy. Christian doctors and healers were the first to advocate complete cleanliness of the body and of course of specific wounds and ailments. Pagan superstitions about 'bad air' [a Roman preoccupation], or 'the gods make you ill' [a Greek-Germanic ideal], were replaced by observation. The use of cautery in treating wounds was first developed by Christians in the 4th century; and by the 9th century Christian hospitals were the first to develop anesthesia using a mix of henbane and opium, for surgical procedures.  Common surgery included amputations, removal of brain and bodily tumors, removal of foreign objects such as metal, and bone repair. Nuns by 650 AD had formed the first order of nurses, and from England to Sicily, nuns and Christian healers worked side by side to treat the sick. Almost all Christian hospitals were free of charge.

 

Most of the infirmary wards were sited in areas which provided natural herbs and remedies. In many places even today, one can visit these sites and behold the 200-300 different varieties of plants nearby which were the hospital's pharmacopoeia. I doubt today that anyone visiting these sites could identify 3 plants correctly. There was no Moslem influence here, but local knowledge and experimentation. Indeed the Christian hospital had dedicated monks, who delved in experimentation of recipes and concoctions, in the attempt to resolve specific ailments and complaints. In fact many herbal remedies were superior to what we have today. It is doubtful that our modern society so stuffed on pills filled with poison have improved in-toto, our intake of medicine. Abortion as well seems to be rather pagan and murderous does it not ? In some ways modernity is a regression.

 

Converted Moslems, or Jews, Persians and Christians with Moslem names, did contribute some knowledge about smallpox, meningitis and other infectious diseases. This information was enthusiastically added to the catalogue of Christian knowledge. Dedicated university faculties of medicine at Bologna and elsewhere, were only too eager to adopt whatever worked, from wherever it came. Not so the Moslem world. The transfer of information was uni-directional. Though Christian medicine, and its institutions were far in advanced of the Moslem, then as now, the Moslems guided by their moon deity, believed they had nothing to learn from the infidel ape and pig. A lie much cherished by Marxist, Atheists, and the big-brains of the world. Christian medicine in the medieval period was not 'dark'. Our ignorance is what is truly dark.  

 

A short list of Medieval inventions can be found here https://www.medievalists.net/2015/11/top-10-medical-advances-from-the-middle-ages/  and include:  Medical schools, Anatomy, Eyeglasses, Advanced Surgery, Pharmacies, Hospitals, Dental Amalgams, Quarantining.

 

 

The Illegal Muslim invasion of the UK accelerates

Moslems are already quite likely; 10 % of the UK population and that will double in 10-15 years

Bookmark and Share

 

The Muslim invasion of the UK continues unabated.  Most Fake News articles do mention the illegal Muslim boat invasion.  Often the Churches and Fake News refer to these illegals as ‘asylum seekers’ and emphasise (with mendacity) that they are children; or fleeing war and famine (in France apparently).  Under the EU (4th Reich laws), Muslim invaders cannot be deported between member states.  It has been 4 years and 4 months after sanity prevailed and the UK decided to Brexit.  Yet the UK is tied to EU laws until January 1 2021.  Because of this, the globalist-left wing governance of Boris Johnson’s administration will do nothing to stop the illegal invasion. 

 

Most of the invaders are given 4 star hotel accommodation, halal food, wi-fi and money.  Yet, not a Fake News story about who they really are, what they will do here (do they speak English, will they work, how much welfare will they consume, how much crime emanates from these illegals, what about local labour now potentially priced out of lower paying jobs?).  Many legal immigrants to the UK pay £20.000 on average for Family visas. 

 

Apparently, a proper visa is a requirement to live and work in this country.  However, an illegal, can hop across the channel, is never deported and can access welfare benefits.  After a few years he will be able to vote in elections, within a country, on institutions and policies, he knows nothing about.  Collective IQs must be very low indeed to not only suffer this illegality, but defend it, and ask for more ‘asylum seekers’ to invade an already over-crowded island.

 

UK Population Official Estimate based on 2011 data:  67 million

UK Population Unofficial Estimate based on Housing:  75 million

UK Moslem population, based on 2011 census data:  3.4 million

UK Moslem population, based on mosques, and illegals:  7.5 million

 

The UK is probably 10% Moslem at this point.  This will double within 15 years to 15 million.  Entire cities will be Moslem managed.  Ministries, including immigration, will become Muslim dominated.  The entire invasion will simply accelerate until many northern UK cities and London are majority Muslim by 2040 to 2050.

 

The boat invasion of Muslim illegals proceeds apace.  The useless administration of Boris Johnson, handcuffed by European diktats, does nothing.

 

“So far in 2020, nearly 7,000 third world migrants have illegally crossed the English Channel from France into British territory on small boats. September 2nd saw the highest daily arrivals, with 416 illegals landing.

 

While reports vary as to whether last year saw 1,800 or 1,823 people arrive, The Telegraph reported on Wednesday that for September 2020 alone there had been at least 1,880, with days still to go before the end of the month. According to government figures, 2018 only saw a combined 297 interceptions in British waters and landings on English beaches.”