Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.
The cultural differences between the systems of thought, induced by the ideologies of Islam and those which comprise Western society are worlds apart. Islam has little if anything in
common with Christian ideals, Western culture, or modern, Christian and even
secular rationalism – irrational and obtuse as much secular ‘logic’ is today
(cosmology, globaloneywarming, tulips to teachers etc, which are philosophies
not science). Contrary to revisionist literature and pathetic Muslim apologia
Western scientific, artistic, religious, societal and historically development
has little connection with and imported scant material from Islam. Islam is a
complete system of 'being' and this cultural fact – mass communalism and
subservience to an abstract and never explained moon deity from Mecca called
'Allah' or ‘The Lord’ (Baal of course); makes conflict at every level
domestically, and internationally, inevitable.
When
cultures collide, conflict erupts. When modernity runs into pagan pre-modern
cultures, modernity will triumph provided that it does not compromise its own
culture. Our current post modern Marxist obsession with relativity and the
dismantling of Western ideals is an obvious display of suicide premised on
ignorance. Once you destroy what you are and who you are, there is little left
to defend, and little energy remaining to improve. Islam does not suffer from
post-modern communal loathing.
Islam is
not a religion in the Christian sense. The book of Matthew which houses the
sermon on the mount; the golden rule; and the basic ethos of Jewish-Christian
and indeed near eastern ideals on life, family, society, responsibility and
spiritual health; has no equal or counterpart in the Koran. Christian thought
is not replicated in Muslim-Quranic thought.
Christianity
is concerned with seeking truth, the obvious existence of the immaterial, mental
and spiritual health; the consequences of actions; the need to reflect,
tolerate, learn, embrace and be hospitable to strangers; as well as aid the
poor and sick and build a better world for all. Islamic doctrine supplied by
the Koran, the Hadiths and Sharia Law do not share these concerns. The Koran splits the world into two, Moslems
against the Rest; with lurid, violent calls to dominate, convert, war, commit jihad,
and to rule. Islam is a cult in which the few – male Muslims – dominate the
rest.
Islam has
never been based on reason, the interstation of faith and logic or universal
morality. Christianity is suffused with all of these. By its very nature, the faith of Christ is
open to inquiry, socio-economic and technological change, invention, and
fluidity. It is malleable yet concrete,
and this is the reason it was able to dominate the world. Even the poorly named Christian reformation did
in some sense aid in a liberation of spirit, economy and self-confidence which
inspired European world domination. This ‘reformation’ was in many ways a deformation,
calling for sola scriptura, the putting aside of good works with salvation through
faith alone; and of course the violent destruction of hundreds of thousands of
lives; art, treasure, irreplaceable artefacts and architecture. The ‘reformation’ of the 16th
century in Europe was more about power and absolutism than anything else. Having said the obvious, it is also clear
that the egregious conduct at times of the Church, had necessitated a
response. There are no corollaries
within the Arab cult named Submission.
Christian
spiritual reformation has always been on-going.
Bishop and ascetic Chrysostom in the 4th century ridiculed
the hypocrisy of contemporary Christians and especially the plutocratic elite;
a series of charges which would be quite appropriate today. Every era saw reformers of various bents and
hues advocating change and usually a return to the simplicity of Christ’s
doctrine. In many areas of Christendom
by the 15th century, taken over by secular and monied interests, the
Christian church had grown rotted and fat, greased with money, wealth,
corruption and venality. It was as far removed from the book of Matthew as Islamic
doctrine is removed from reason. The Christian church by the 16th century was
no longer a spiritual force, but just another kingdom on earth with popes
playing the role of emperor, the church elders engaged in legal issues and
lawsuits, to expand their money, power and make states subservient to Rome, and
tax money often flowing to a centralised and unaccountable church bureaucracy
and city. Yet, despite this,
science, medicine, art, trade and capitalism, funded, supported and developed
by the Church flourished.
Contrary
to modern propaganda, the medieval Christian church had many positives. The
monkish orders were the main providers of capital, agricultural technology and
farming improvements. The church housed the most literate and learned of men.
Roger Bacon one of the earliest exponents of the scientific method and other
rationalists were monks and supported by church money to improve technology and
daily life. Hundreds of inventions
including optics, eye glasses, modern math and astronomy, issued from the Church
and its endeavours. The Church was the
only stable benefactor in a world of shifting kingdoms, neglect of the poor,
denigration of women, and the persecution of the weak.
It was the
Church which saved civilization both from Rome, and post-Rome. The Christian message of true spirituality
released society from the burdens and regulations of dogma, superstition and
irrational rule making. These were all prevalent in the violent Roman-pagan
era, in which 90% of the population was poor, enslaved, illiterate and without
hope. Christianity refocused society on
the true meanings of liberation, namely equality, faith and hope. It generated
energy, dynamism and ideas. The Church made the call to individual freedom and
the striking down of an unaccountable cultish mentality which had rotted pagan
society into obsolescence.
By
contrast Islam has never a comparable base for its development, nor alignment
with reason and faith. It is
totalitarian. Islam though riven by
sects and different interpretations is monolithic in the sense that the Koran
rules and that subservience to the Koranic-Mohammed ideal the most important
element in a Muslim's life. It is thus the communal over the individual. This
ethos of communal universalism negates what the Christian Church has always
taught. Invention, progress, self-reliance, democratic governance, rational
scientism, these and other derivatives of Western greatness have no corollary
in Islamic history.
Islam was
a squatter's empire. It has self-generated very little to aid human kind. Its
purpose is communal domination. Its expansion was propelled by war, lust, gold,
women and slaves. This is not to say that Western expansionism was benign or
morally correct. But it is obvious that Western settled and developed areas are
far better off than those which are not.
The West
is not some utopia of moral perfection but its original culture of
individuality and Christian ethos regardless of what the chattering Marxists or
Muslims say today, was and is far superior to anything that Islam has or can
offer. Without a Muslim reinvention, a conflict at all levels between the pagan
cult of Islam and the modern world is inevitable. It is a conflict that Islam
will of course lose – as long as the West decides that it should win.
Consider this hate speech and vitriol against Jews and
Christians who are called Abu Jahl (disbelievers) and Al Mushrikun (criminals),
in Mein Koran:
Those who disbelieve from
among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) and among
Al-Mushrikun, were not going to leave (their disbelief) until there came to
them clear evidence. |
|
And the people of the
Scripture (Jews and Christians) differed not until after there came to them
clear evidence. (i.e. Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and whatever was
revealed to him). |
|
And they were commanded
not, but that they should worship Allah, and worship none but Him Alone
(abstaining from ascribing partners to Him), and perform As-Salat
(Iqamat-as-Salat) and give Zakat: and that is the right religion. |
|
Verily, those who
disbelieve (in the religion of Islam, the Qur'an and Prophet Muhammad (Peace
be upon him)) from among the people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)
and Al-Mushrikun will abide in the Fire of Hell. They are the worst of
creatures. |
These themes saturate and inform Muhammad’s cult
document. Jews and Christians are
satanic enemies, who must be destroyed and who will in any event, be tormented
by Baal the moon deity, who is the Al Lah (Lord) of Mecca.
It is well
known that the smaller Suras, compiled during the early phase of Muhammad's
cult, were culled and plagiarized from the Kabaa shrine.
These verses are later re-assembled and infused with the usual litany of
Koranic-Muhammadan intolerance towards non-Moslems. It is worthwhile to note
two obvious facts.
First, Muhammad's attempt at gang organization in Mecca,
disguised as social 'reform' and concern for the 'poor', was a remarkable
failure. He was deemed to be a social agitator, hungry for power, illiterate,
quite stupid and probably insane. The Meccan elite had little patience for a
man who was condemning Arab pagan theology, and distorting if not obstructing
trade and money which flowed to the Meccan shrines from pilgrims and the pagan
faithful. Instead of killing him for generating social turbulence the Meccans
exiled him to Yathrib or Medina. A fateful mistake of course.
Second, Muhammad's lack of education, erudition and even
innovative ideas is reflected by his plagiarism of both pagan Arab poems and
ideas; and of Judeo-Christian tenets which he had picked up as a simple caravan
trader in Syria. Nothing Muhammad said or uttered was new or ethical. Most saw
through his thin veneer of 'social concern' to discern a brigand, a thug and a
political-military adventurer, one who would lead armies, butcher men with his
own hands, slaughter Jews, Christians and pagans, and engage in lurid sex
trafficking and the establishment of a personal harem – all the while bathing
in stolen gold and luxuries, and taxes for his Meccan cult centred around
Hub'Al, the Lord, or the Al-Lah.
The moon idol, Al-Lah did not create the Koran. Muhammad and
later generations of Arabs and Moslems did, each with a self-interested
purpose. The Hadiths for example were largely compiled by the Abbasids during a
civil war in the 9th century, some 200 years after the founder of
Submission had been murdered by his own men.
Of particular import to Moslem and Arab culture is the
random violence against non-cult members. The Koran is a merger of pagan Arab
mores with Muhammad's intolerance. In the last 21 smaller
verses of the cult document, there are 388 verses. Only
109 verses or 28%preach hate speech against the Infidel. Only
a cult document would contain such lurid hatred against Unbelievers. Examples
of hate speech verses from Sura 83 to 114 are:
Woe, that Day, to those who
deny [(Allah, His Angels, His Books, His Messengers, the Day of Resurrection,
and Al-Qadar (Divine Preordainments)]. |
|
And none can deny it except
every transgressor beyond bounds, (in disbelief, oppression and disobedience
of Allah, the sinner!) |
|
And shall enter a blazing
Fire, and made to taste its burning. |
|
Some faces, that Day, will
be humiliated (in the Hell-fire, i.e. the faces of all disbelievers, Jews and
Christians, etc.). |
|
Labouring (hard in the
worldly life by worshipping others
besides Allah), weary (in the Hereafter with humility and disgrace). |
|
They will enter in the hot
blazing Fire, |
|
They will be given to drink
from a boiling spring, |
|
No food will there be for
them but a poisonous thorny plant, |
|
Which will neither nourish
nor avail against hunger. |
|
But those who disbelieved
in Our Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.),
they are those on the Left Hand (the dwellers of Hell). |
|
The Fire will be shut over
them (i.e. they will be enveloped by the Fire without any opening or window
or outlet. |
|
Tell me if he (the
disbeliever, Abu Jahl) denies (the truth, i.e. this Qur'an), and turns away? |
|
Nay! If he (Abu Jahl)
ceases not, We will catch him by the forelock, |
|
A lying, sinful forelock! |
|
Then, let him call upon his
council (of helpers), |
|
We will call the guards of
Hell (to deal with him)! |
|
He will have his home in
Hawiyah (pit, i.e. Hell). |
|
In pillars stretched forth
(i.e. they will be punished in the Fire with pillars, etc.). |
|
Have you (O Muhammad (Peace
be upon him)) not seen how your Lord dealt with the Owners of the Elephant?
[The elephant army which came from Yemen under the command of Abrahah
Al-Ashram intending to destroy the Ka'bah at Makkah]. (note this was largely a Black-Christian
Ethiopian army) |
|
Say (O Muhammad (Peace be
upon him)to these Mushrikun and Kafirun): "O Al-Kafirun (disbelievers in
Allah, in His Oneness, in His Angels, in His Books, in His Messengers, in the
Day of Resurrection, and in Al-Qadar, etc.)! |
The themes are simple-minded, fantastic, cultish and quite
repetitive:
2 ) Muhammad must be obeyed since the Al-Lah idol has designated Muhammad to be the most important human ever. Not to follow in-toto, Muhammad's diktat is a 'sin' perpetrated by 'criminals.
3 ) Al-Lah is the only free-will force in the entire universe. Humans only have the 'free will' to follow what he wants them to follow.
4) All Infidels including those importunate enough even to question Al-Lah [aka Muhammad] will be tortured in Hell-fire on Judgement Day.
5 ) Islam is superior to any other cult, religion or social organization [Sura 9-102:6, you keep your 'religion' and don't taint Islam with your dogma].
These themes are that of a cult, not a religion. Perhaps Moslems might first want to read the Koran to associate themselves with the pagan-fascist [communalism which eradicates the individual, rationality and free-will], cult of a man who was most likely quite insane.
Muslim brutality and Islam's primitive nature is represented by its devotion to slavery. From 622 A.D. until now, the Muslims have harvested, shipped, and enslaved somewhere between 11 to 30 million Blacks and Caucasians. Until the 20th century at least 11-15 million Blacks were taken out of Africa and shipped into the Arab heartland. A similar number of Whites and Caucasians from Eastern Europe and the Black Sea regions were likewise transhipped into Muslim empires until the 19th century.
A far greater number of Hindus, Central Asians and Buddhists were similarly enslaved in the Arab empire and its successor states in the Subcontinent and beyond. It is a sordid record never discussed. No one knows for sure, but it is not an exaggeration to suppose that 40 million non-Muslims were directly enslaved by Mohammedans. This is four times greater than the number of Blacks sent across to the Atlantic – 4 million of whom ended up in Brazil, and 2 milion of whom ended up in the United States.
But don't worry no-one will discuss the history of Arab and Muslim slave trading. This after all is a White-only crime.
Arab and later Muslim empires were of course built on plunder, squatting and slavery. The Arabs and Muslims did not invent, nor create, anything new. They simply took over the existing and far superior civilisations of the Jews, the Christians, the Persians, the Hindus and the Greeks. Medicine, mathematics, philosophy, writing, literature, plumbing, hospitals, sewers, architecture, cement, agricultural techniques, irrigation – any and all sundry accroutements of civilisation were built by the Greeks, the Romans, the Jews, the Persians, the Mesopotamians, or the Hindus. The Arabs contributed nothing.
Except the slave trade that is.
The Arabs were superb at trading human flesh. Better even than Blacks who had enslaved each other for millenia, long before the White man arrived on the African scene. The Arab's empire depended on slavery – for profit, for building, for tending to mines and industry, and even for military drafts. Without the trade in Black and White slaves, the Arab and Muslim empires would have collapsed.
According to Bernard Lewis, author of 'Race and Slavery in the Middle East': "Black slaves were brought into the Islamic world by a number of routes - from West Africa across the Sahara to Morocco and Tunisia, from Chad across the desert to Libya, from East Africa down the Nile to Egypt, and across the Red Sea and Indian Ocean to Arabia and the Persian Gulf. Turkish slaves from the steppe-lands were marketed in Samarkand and other Muslim Central Asian cities and from there exported to Iran, the Fertile Crescent, and beyond. Caucasians, of increasing importance in the later centuries, were brought from the land bridge between the Black Sea and the Caspian and were marketed mainly in Aleppo and Mosul." The trade was vital for the Arab economy.
One can make a very good argument that Islam and the Koran are inherently racist and anti-Black, if not anti-White. Kaffir is a derogatory Arab word first used to denote Blacks as inferior sub-humans, which was later expanded to include all non-Muslims. Slavery of Blacks and other non-Muslims is expressly accepted and encouraged in the Koran. Though the mad fascist Muslim founder Mohammed, states that freeing slaves gains merit, he certainly never made any prohibitions against acquiring slaves. In fact Mohammed encouraged by his own actions and various 'revelations' extensive slave-owning. Sura 33, verse 50 states for example: "Prophet, we have made lawful for you.... the slave-girls whom God has given you as booty."
Mohammed not only owned and traded slaves himself – he also quite enjoyed female slaves as sex toys. Women captured in war or bought as slaves on the market could be raped at will by Muslims. The Koran encouraged this. Suras 23:1 and 70:22 state that it is lawful to have sex with slave girls. The Hadiths are filled with references to slaves owned by Mohammed and his associates. In one Hadith Mohammed intervened to reverse one man's emancipation of six slaves. By casting lots, Mohammed denied freedom to four of them. Charitable he was not.
One does not recall the figure of Christ using women as sex chattel.
With such a poor example set by the founder of Islam, it is no wonder that Muslim countries were slow to forbid slavery. Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807 and the institution in 1837. Over 500.000 White males died eradicating in part if not instantly in whole, the insidious and barbaric Southern US slave society. Yet no such corollary exists in the non-Western world.
The Ottoman Empire abolished slavery in stages, beginning in 1847, when trading in slaves was banned in the Persian Gulf – under threat of British military action. Women slaves were still sold in the Ottoman Empire as late as 1908. Slavery continued after the Ottoman Empire was crushed in 1924. Qatar did not abolish slavery until 1952. Yemen and Saudi Arabia abolished slavery in 1962, and Mauritania did not officially abolish slavery until 1980. And of course slavery still exists in parts of Africa, Brazil, Pakistan, the Sudan and other parts of the Islamic world including the forced marriages of young Muslim girls, usually premised on sex, to older men in exchange for money. Compassionate this trade is not.
Muslims appear to be obsessed with slavery. This would make sense. Slavery has often been declared by Muslim clerics and 'thinkers' as a fundamental part of Islamic culture and doctrine. Many Muslim leaders refuse to countenance the destruction of the slave institution. It is not hard to see why. Muslim slavery of others simply highlights their superiority and Allah's admonition via Mohammed, that Islam must conquer the globe. If male Muslims rule, than de facto the rest are slaves or at best, second-class dhimmi citizens, prey to whatever rules Muslims devise.
Sharia law, Muslim demands in the West to reorder social and cultural life, and radical extremist arrogance in viewing the world as a pre-determined domain of Allah or the moon cult, all stem from the Muslim obsession with domination. Dominating others through jihad, terror, and slavery is a fundamental aspect of Islamic intolerance.
This is not to say that all Muslims are voracious slave traders and sex chattel operators. But there is something remarkably pagan and primitive, if not outlandishly savage, about an ideology in the 21rst century which still protects and participates in the most de-humanizing of activities. The natural law rights of men, such an important part of Western civilisational development, is completely alien to Islam.
It is no wonder that the history of Islam is in some sense, a history of the slave trade. From West Africa to the islands of Indonesia, the Arabs and Muslims have been history's most ruthless slavers and flesh traders. This ties in nicely with Islamic ideology and its commands.
But don't worry – no one will discuss it. After all according to the multi-cult piety, Islam is holy and good, even one supposes, its extensive history of slavery.
Sura 109 is held up in
awe by the one-world wonders as an example of Islam's endless love and
tolerance. It ranks up there with 2:256 in the pantheon of cultural Marxist
worship, in which the reader is informed that Infidels will be fought, overcome
and dominated by those who follow Allah [read the entire passage from 2:256 to 2:275]. Sura 109 is a short Sura,
orally transcribed by Muhammad when his cult was weak, with few followers and
harassed by Meccan authorities, who were tired of listening to Muhammad's
gibberish that the Arab pagan pantheon was 'evil', and that the Hub'Allah
demanded a stricter, totalitarian, and more ritualistic method of worship –
with himself as the prime actor in the cult.
Here is Sura 109 translated
by Hilali-Khan:
“Al-Kafirun In the
Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful.
Say (O Muhammad (Peace be upon him)to these Mushrikun and Kafirun): "O
Al-Kafirun (disbelievers in Allah, in His Oneness, in His Angels, in His Books,
in His Messengers, in the Day of Resurrection, and in Al-Qadar, etc.)!
"I worship not
that which you worship,
"Nor will you
worship that which I worship. "And I shall not worship that which you are
worshipping.
"Nor will you
worship that which I worship.
“To you be your
religion, and to me my religion (Islamic Monotheism)."
Cultural Marxists and self-loathing Western idiots can't get enough of this Sura. You worship your Gods, I will worship mine. Oh wow, that is so tolerant. It proves Islam's superiority! But not really. There are three aspects to this verse that the one-world wonders miss.
1 ) Before Muhammad
started Jihad, war, extermination, overt racism, and brigandage his small band
of family members and cult devotees never numbered more than a handful. So of
course someone who is being persecuted by the authorities is going to whine,
'please leave me alone, worship your 'Gods', and I will worship mine.'
2 ) More importantly,
and rarely mentioned, is the fact that Muhammad is talking about Allah or
Hub'Allah, being the main 'god' amongst many. In other words the import of this
Sura is that it references Arab polytheism. What Muhammad is saying is that the
Arabs can worship their many Gods, but he will worship only one – Hubal or
'ilah – namely the 'one Lord'.
3 )This Sura references
a contract stemming from the above 2 points, forwarded by Muhammad to the
Quraish elite.
Now some other
translators have a different set of words for the 5th sentence,
and all of them make it clear that Muhammad is denying polytheism and elevating
his idea of that Allah is the main 'God' amongst all the Gods:
Nor will ye worship that which I worship.
Pickthall and Ali
Nor will you
be the worshipper of what I worship. Daryabadi and Dawood
Nor will ye serve what
I serve;- Palmer
Nor will you ever
worship what I worship. Khalifa
And neither will you
[ever] worship that which I worship. Asad etc.
Sura 109 is not a
celebration of multi-cultural harmony. It is Muhammad stating the obvious. You
pagan Arabs will continue to worship your Gods [as long as your state and
society are strong]; and our small cult will worship our one 'God'. So let's
agree to disagree is what he is asking.
But notice the contradiction in this Sura. The Koran demands that you believe that Allah or
Hub'Allah is the 'one'. Only he can be worshipped. Yet Sura 109 is clear – other gods
were being worshipped including Allah. Allah is not unique, not
connected to Judaism, and has no reference in Judeo-Christian theology.
Allah was being worshipped by the pagan Arabs [in the form of Hub'Al] along
with 359 other deities. Muhammad is thus confirming the paganism of this Allah.
Lastly, the Sura
is a proposed contract from Muhammad to the Quraish elite. We know this
from Moslem sources. Maududi the early twentieth century Moslem
fanatic and supporter of unfettered Jihad states that Sura 109 refers to a
proposed peace initiative from Muhammad to the Quraish elite. When you
take this into account the Sura does not declaim for tolerance, but simply
rejects the Meccan belief system. This fact eventually drove Muhammad from
Mecca – at the threat of being killed by the Quraish. Tolerance does not exist
in Islam, nor in Muhammadan theology. As Maududi confirms:
“....[this Sura] was revealed in order to
exonerate the Muslims from the disbelievers religion, their rites of worship,
and their gods, and to express their total disgust and unconcern with them and
to tell them that Islam and kufr (unbelief) had nothing in common and there
was no possibility of their being combined and mixed into one entity. Although
it was addressed in the beginning to the disbelieving Quraish in response to
their proposals of compromise, yet it is not confined to them only, but having
made it a part of the Quran, Allah gave the Muslims the eternal teaching that
they should exonerate themselves by word and deed from the creed of kufr
wherever and in whatever form it be, and should declare without any reservation
that they cannot make any compromise with the disbelievers in the matter of
Faith.”
So much for one-world,
inter-faith tolerance. Sura 109 has nothing to do with love and hope. It is a
clear statement of supremacism, and the innate Moslem belief of their own
superiority.
3 Moslems were arrested for attempting to blow up the Rialto Bridge in Venice. Another week in the EUtopia; and another Moslem Jihadist attack or plot. Quel Surpris. This event won’t be reported by the Fake News MSM. Nor will it be picked up by the usual poseurs and really clever people.
“With all the unbelievers there are in Venice, you put a bomb under the Rialto and you go straight to heaven,” one of the alleged jihadist plotters said in a wiretapped conversation, said Adelchi d’Ippolito, the Venice prosecutor in charge of the case.
Of course, plotting to kill ‘unbelievers’ means that this has Nothing To Do With Islam – NTDWI.
If such events are mentioned the Left/Communist/Cultural Marxist talking points come out. Pre-emptively one can summarize the usual response from the big brains:
Pope Frank: ‘These are migrants, who like Jesus, are searching for love and hope.’
Fake News MSM: ‘They are Christian, and are Italian citizens with deep tans, named Luigi, Alfredo, Giuseppe’.
Politicians: ‘Islamophobia caused this’.
NGOs backed by Soros money: ‘Racism is the root cause of this provoked plot’.
Green Tards: ‘This proves Globaloneywarming causes Jihad’.
Empress Hussein Obama: ‘Islam is peace and therefore Moslems cannot be involved’.
Psych Professor: ‘They suffered from mental illness’.
University students; ‘Don’t fall into the right wing trap and blame the great ‘religion’ of Islam’.
That covers most of the talking points.....
"Pakistan, with approximately 2.1 million slaves, has the third highest
number of slaves in the world. Amongst this number are over 250,000
Christians. Included in these figures are many cases of rape against
wives and daughters of slave families, many of which we have documented.
Slave families usually all work with many very young children exploited.
Christians are subject to even more persecution under their slave owners. They
are denied Sunday worship, or even time off to celebrate Christmas and Easter.
None of the accommodation for the families at the kiln is there any inside
plumbing. The whole family has to relieve themselves in the fields.
Indentured servitude is illegal, even in Pakistan, but because of
corruption and political cronyism, slave owners have free reign to take
advantage of the extreme poverty-stricken people.
A family sells themselves into slavery, usually because of the illness
of a family member for which savings are exhausted for medical care, or for a
daughter’s compulsory dowry. Once they get trapped into slavery it is
impossible to get out of slavery because the interest rates are 300-400 per
cent or more; the principal not only does not go down no matter how hard they
work, but it actually goes up, so that the slave owner owns them for the rest
of their lives. The family is even more vulnerable, as none of them can
read or write.
Freeing all the Christian slaves is a very achievable goal. The
cost of freeing one family, which includes providing them with a new job and a
new place to live, some food and basic essentials, is only $587.00. The average
size family is 7 people, which translates to a cost of only $83.85 per slave
saved. If you wish to sponsor an entire family, we will send you a
message from the family you sponsor, and if you sponsor more than one, we will
send you a personal message from each of those, too.
Rescue Christians has freed more slaves in the last two years than any
other organization in the world. We have freed over 10,000 people since
we started doing the slave program in 2012, most of these in the last two
years. The organization “Free the Slaves” has freed 12,000 people since
2000 – not a bad feat – but this was over a 16-year period. We
believe, with your support, we can free all 250,000 Christian slaves over the
next 5-10 years. The cost of doing this is about $20 million, which is about 2
to 4 million dollars to be raised per year. If you would like to sponsor
one or more families, please click here. If you donate $587 or more we will
send you a video from the family you sponsor. They will thank you (sub-titled
in English) in a personal video, which we will email to you within 6 weeks of
your donation being made.
Our programs are not just about freeing people, but reclaiming the lives
of families by providing a proper living wage in a new job or micro business,
new places to live that have running water, inside plumbing for proper
bathrooms and electricity. We provide these opportunities through the
generous donations of our readers and supporters. In a 24-hour period, a
family goes from abject poverty, back-breaking work, with no hope, children who
have no schooling, to a miracle transformation, with hope, opportunity and
children who now will learn to read and write which will hopefully break the
line of poverty for their family forever. For $20 million dollars
we can change the lives of about 38,000 families or 250,000 people who have
been enslaved."
Website: http://rescuechristians.org/free-christian-slaves/
The
Middle Ages were not ‘dark’. Today’s
culture is rather dark indeed with the various cults people belong to. Panspermia; Dark Matter; Pregnant Black
Holes; Globaloneywarming; Plant-food-is-evil; ‘Science’ [fiction]; Islam is
Peace; Open Borders; Historical Revisionism; Abortion….the list is quite
endless. Regarding the hysterical modern
cult of ‘Islam is Peace’ the philosophers of the Middle Ages [called ‘scientists’
today]; were under no illusions about Muhammadism, which is what Islam or
Submission needs to be called.
Muhammadism is the cult of Muhammad and a cult it is.
One
Middle Age scientist [or philosopher] was St. Thomas Aquinas, one of the
brightest men that Western Civilisation has developed. Living in the 13th century, and
through the last phases of the Crusades, Acquinas offered a biting critique of
Islam based in large part on the questionable character and methods of its founder,
Mohammed.
Aquinas and indeed anyone who has bothered to study Muhammadism,
will know that this cult appealed to ignorant, brutish, carnal men and it was spread
not by the power of its arguments or divine grace but only by blood and the
power of the sword. Muhammadism, like
Nazism or Communism, is a coercive cult; one that must propitiate the Baal idol
[or Al Lah, the Lord of Mecca], with blood offerings. This propitiation with blood to appease the
moon deity long precedes Muhammadism of course and was a central pillar of the
Baal cults of the Near East, of which the Meccan was just one. Muhammad’s family were of course the
caretakers of the Baal or Al Lah shrine.
Aquinas knew this. Being a
keen observer of the human condition, he was also familiar with the chief works
of the Muslim philosophers of his day including Avicenna, Algazel, and
Averroes–and engaged them in his writings.
He found them wanting. Unlike the
claims by the modern cult of Islamophilia, Moslem ‘science’ produced very
little. Most ‘inventions’ ascribed to
Moslems were converts or those living in Moslem domains. Most of the creations pre-date Moslem
conquests. Acquinas knew this and was
able to quite easily dissect Muhammadism both theologically and practically.
In his voluminous Summa contra gentiles, or Summary against non
Christians, which Aquinas wrote between 1258 and 1264 AD, the genius argued for
the truth of Christianity against other belief systems, including Muhammadism. Looking at the poverty of Muhammad’s cult,
this claim is not difficult to make.
Aquinas for example contrasted the spread of Christianity with
that of Islam, arguing that much of Christianity’s early success stemmed from
widespread belief in the miracles of Jesus, whereas the spread of Islam was
worked through the promise of sensual pleasures and the violence of the sword. Muhammadism appealed to the deranged, venal,
lying, bloody, material, violent and sexual.
Christianity to their opposites.
Mohammad, Aquinas wrote, “seduced the people by
promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us.
His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises,
and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure.”
Such an offer, Aquinas contended, appealed to a certain type of
person of limited virtue and wisdom.
“In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men,”
he wrote. “As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only
such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest
wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with
doctrines of the greatest falsity.”
Because of the weakness of Muhammadism’s contentions, Aquinas
argued, “no wise men, men trained in
things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning.” Instead,
those who believed in him “were brutal men and desert wanderers,
utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Muhammad forced
others to become his followers by the violence of his arms.”
Muhammadism’s violent methods of propagation were especially
unconvincing to Aquinas, since he found that the use of such force does not
prove the truth of one’s claims, and are the means typically used by evil men.
“Mohammad
said that he was sent in the power of his arms,” Aquinas wrote, “which are
signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants.”
At the time Aquinas was writing, Islam was generally considered a
Christian heresy, since it drew so heavily on Christian texts and beliefs. Aquinas wrote that Mohammed “perverts
almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them into
fabrications of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law.”
According to the noted historian Hilaire Belloc, Muhammadism,
“began as a heresy, not as a new religion. It was not a pagan contrast with the
Church; it was not an alien enemy. It was a perversion of Christian doctrine.
Its vitality and endurance soon gave it the appearance of a new religion, but
those who were contemporary with its rise saw it for what it was—not a denial,
but an adaptation and a misuse, of the Christian thing.”
In his Summa contra gentiles, Aquinas ends his argument by stating
the obvious that Muhammed, had to keep
his followers ignorant in order for them to remain faithful. It was,
Aquinas wrote, “a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read
the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity.”
“It is thus clear that those who place any faith in his words
believe foolishly,” he wrote.
Aquinas is of course correct. Muhammad himself was largely ignorant, a
war lord, a man who had 24 sex slaves and wives, who had sex with a 9-year-old,
who murdered started wars and brutalized populations. For clever people, this makes him a ‘prophet’
of peace.
For the brain dead, the Muhammadan
cult is peace, love and tolerance. When
Moslems engage in their weekly Jihadic activity somewhere in the West, the MSM,
elite and politicians studiously ignore it, terming it ‘Islamist’, or the
outbreak of mental illness and actions from the lone-wolf union
membership. Moslems become ‘Asians’,
youth, ‘migrants’, or ‘immigrants’.
Their actions are never associated with the moon cult of Mecca [Baal is
AL Lah, and Muhammad’s family were the caretakers of the Baal shrine].
The paedophile Muhammad, who had
sex with a 9-year-old [to consummate an alliance with his most important
general Abu Bakr, through his daughter Aisha]; and a man who slaughtered Arab
pagans, Jews, and Christians; and who plundered these communities to enrich
himself; is portrayed as a ‘prophet’ of peace, liberating women, enfranchising
the poor, instituting moral standards and revivifying faith. A ‘great man’ of a ‘great faith’, say Pope
Frank, Prime Minister May, ex-Communist propaganda minister for youth and now
Chancellor Merkel; and the other huge brains of the political scene. Ascribing to this fuehrer figure such deeds
goes beyond absurd – it is psychotic, mentally deranged, psychosomatically
ill. If such a man created a cult – why
is it religious and why would it devotees behave any better ?
According to really smart people,
only ‘fundamentalist’ [ie. ‘fascist’] Jews and Christians oppose the Muhammdan
moon cult. This is of course, a
lie. Socialists, Atheists and other
worthies have also recognized the totalitarian barbarism of Muhammadan
fascism. One of the more famous recently
is Oriana Fallaci, Italy’s best known socialist journalist and author. Communism would probably describe rather
succinctly, her ideas of the political-economy.
But unlike Merkel et al, she views Islam for what it is:
‘She
vividly describes how Muslim migrants would urinate and defecate on
artistic treasures in Florence, including the celebrated bronze doors at the
Baptistery – the “Gates of Heaven” by Lorenzo Ghiberti. Right after 9/11,
Fallaci wrote a furious article about the behavior of Muslims in the West; it
took up four full pages in the Corriere della Sera; she then turned it
into a book, The Rage and the Pride, a full-bore attack on Islam and
Muslims that does not mince words, and that has sold millions of copies.’
Moslems urinating, defecating and
defacing Christian symbols is nothing new.
It is demanded in Mein Koran. All
idols – pace Muhammad who smashed 359 idols of the Kabbah shrine, save that of
Baal – must be destroyed. Failing that a
pious Moslem must desecrate them.
Fallaci of course criticized Islam for its sex slavery, misogyny, its
hypocrisy, its wanton violence, its inimitable barbarism. For that she was sued by ‘human rights
courts’ in Europe and her life threatened by Moslems.
Atheists
such as David Hume, in an age when clarity was not an issue also detested
Islam. Hume read Mein Koran and was
instantly repelled – as any person with a brain would be:
Let us attend to
his narration; and we shall soon find, that he bestows praise on such instances of treachery, inhumanity, cruelty, revenge,
bigotry, as are utterly incompatible with civilized society. No steady rule of
right seems there to be attended to; and every action is blamed or praised, so
far only as it is beneficial or hurtful to the true believers.
Mark Twain was an Atheist,
anti-Christian and a man who would now be termed a left-liberal. He had no
illusions about Mein Koran:
When I, a
thoughtful and unblessed Presbyterian, examine the Koran, I know that beyond
any question every Mohammedan is insane;
not in all things, but in religious matters.
George
Bernard Shaw another Communist-Atheist, who apologized for the fascism
of Stalin, found Islam the most disturbing ‘faith’ imaginable. At least he understood it has nothing to do
with Christianity:
Islam is very different [from
Christianity], being ferociously intolerant. ..When the Arabs had run this sort
of idolatry to such extremes [that] they did this without black dolls and
worshipped any stone that looked funny, Mahomet rose up at the risk of his life
and insulted the stones shockingly, declaring that there is only one God,
Allah, the glorious, the great… And
there was to be no nonsense about toleration.
And then there is the atheist
Bertrand Russell who wrote comparing the Fascism of Communism quite favourably
with Islam:
Among religions,
Bolshevism is to be reckoned with
Mohammedanism rather than with Christianity and Buddhism. Christianity and
Buddhism are primarily personal religions, with mystical doctrines and a love
of contemplation. Mohammedanism and
Bolshevism are practical, social, unspiritual, concerned to win the empire of
the world.
Immediately
after his [Muhammed’s] death the conquests began, and they proceeded with
rapidity… Westward expansion (except in Sicily and Southern Italy) was brought
to a standstill by the defeat of the Mohammedans at the battle of Tours in 732,
just one hundred years after the death of the Prophet… It was the duty of
the faithful to conquer as much of the world as possible for Islam… The first conquests of the Arabs began as
mere raids for plunder, and only turned into permanent occupation after
experience has shown the weakness of the enemy… The Arabs, although they
conquered a great part of the world in the name of a new religion were not a
very religious race; the motive of their conquests was plunder and wealth
rather than religion.
None of Russell’s analysis can be
gainsaid or debated. Islam is a
totalitarian construct which destroys. It
does not civilize. It adds no
value. It is a cult of sex slavery, violence,
death and war.
Muhammadism demands the elimination of Jews,
Christians and non-Moslems. Witness some
of the juicier bits of Suras 5 and 8 below.
Keep in mind that ‘waging war’ in the Muhammadan book ‘Recital’,
includes not obeying the Koran, and not believing in Muhammad. Other translations use ‘making mischief in
the land’, which is applicable to anyone who does not support and conform to
Sharia – Europe’s future.
Sura 5:
The recompense of those who wage
war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that
they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on
the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in
this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter. |
The most relevant summary of the entire Koran in
one verse. |
|
O you who
believe! Do your duty to Allah and
fear Him. Seek the means of approach to Him, and strive hard in His Cause
as much as you can. So that you may be successful. |
Strive is
Lesser Jihad and includes war, giving money for Jihad and not befriending
Jews or Christians. |
|
Verily, you will find the strongest among men in
enmity to the believers (Muslims) the Jews and those who are Al-Mushrikun
(see V.2:105), and you will find the nearest in love to the believers
(Muslims) those who say: "We are Christians." That is because
amongst them are priests and monks, and they are not proud. |
Jews are
the harshest enemies, Christian monks and the religious are the closest to
the Moslems [Muhammad admired monks but slaughtered and killed Christians]. |
When Muhammadans wage war, spoils, sex slavery,
chattel and plunder is expected and demanded.
Muhammad of course was the great beneficiary of Baal or Al Lah’s revelation
that 1/5 of the treasure including slave women were reserved exclusively for
Moh. The benefits of being a Fascist
Fuehrer.
Sura 8:
They ask you (O Muhammad SAW) about
the spoils of war. Say: "The spoils are for Allah and the
Messenger." So fear Allah and adjust all matters of difference among
you, and obey Allah and His Messenger (Muhammad SAW), if you are believers. |
War is
mandatory see 2:216 |
|
As your
Lord caused you (O Muhammad SAW) to go out from your home with the truth, and
verily, a party among the believers disliked it; |
Moslems
who don’t fight in Jihad are ‘hypocrites’ and can be killed |
|
And
(remember) when Allah promised you (Muslims) one of the two parties (of the
enemy i.e. either the army or the caravan) that it should be yours, you wished that the one not armed (the
caravan) should be yours, but Allah willed to justify the truth by His Words
and to cut off the roots of the disbelievers (i.e. in the battle of Badr). |
Moslems
assaulted a caravan at Badr in 624. Revisionist ‘historians’ try to claim it
was in self-defence – a lie. |
|
Allah
made it only as glad tidings, and that your hearts be at rest therewith. And
there is no victory except from Allah. Verily, Allah is All-Mighty, All-Wise. |
Only Baal
[Al Lah] mgranted the Moslems victory at Badr and in other battles. |
|
O you who
believe! When you meet those who
disbelieve, in a battle-field, never turn your backs to them. |
Fighting
the Infidel is a 6th pillar of Islam |
|
And whoever turns his back to them on
such a day - unless it be a stratagem of war, or to retreat to a troop (of
his own), - he indeed has drawn upon himself wrath from Allah. And his abode is Hell, and worst
indeed is that destination! |
Flee and
you are damned |
|
You killed them not, but Allah killed them. And you
(Muhammad SAW) threw not when you did throw but Allah threw, that He might
test the believers by a fair trial from Him. Verily, Allah is All-Hearer,
All-Knower. |
If you
kill don’t feel bad, Baal did it for you |
|
And fight them until there is no
more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah)
and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone [in the whole of the world]. But if they cease (worshipping others
besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do. |
The 2nd most relevant summary of the
entire Koran in one verse. |
|
And know that whatever of war-booty that you may
gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allah, and to the
Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad SAW)], (and
also) the orphans, Al-Masakin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have
believed in Allah and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad SAW)
on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two
forces met (the battle of Badr) - And Allah is Able to do all things. |
How
convenient. Muhammad’s family idol
Baal or Al Lah gives to Muhammad 1/5 of the spoils |
|
(And remember) when you (the Muslim army) were on
the near side of the valley, and they on the farther side, and the caravan on
the ground lower than you. Even if you had made a mutual appointment to meet, you would certainly have failed in the
appointment, but (you met) that Allah might accomplish a matter already
ordained (in His Knowledge); so that those who were to be destroyed (for their rejecting the
Faith) might be destroyed after a clear evidence, and those who were to live
(i.e. believers) might live after a clear evidence. And surely,
Allah is All-Hearer, All-Knower. |
Allah or
Baal justifies the slaughter of innocents because they had rejected
Muhammadism – a common theme in Mein Koran |
|
And let not those who disbelieve think that they
can outstrip (escape from the punishment). Verily, they
will never be able to save themselves (from Allah's Punishment). |
Jews and
Christians will be pursued until they all die |
|
And make ready against them all you can of power,
including steeds of war to threaten the enemy of Allah and your enemy, and
others besides whom, you may not know but whom Allah does know. And whatever
you shall spend in the Cause of Allah shall be repaid unto you, and you shall
not be treated unjustly. |
War, war
and more war |
|
O Prophet
(Muhammad SAW)! Urge the believers to fight. If there are
twenty steadfast persons amongst you, they will overcome two hundred, and if
there be a hundred steadfast persons they will overcome a thousand of those
who disbelieve, because they (the disbelievers) are people who do not
understand. |
Main duty
of Moslems is to kill Infidels |
|
Now Allah
has lightened your (task), for He knows that there is weakness in you. So if there are of you a hundred
steadfast persons, they shall overcome two hundred, and if there are a
thousand of you, they shall overcome two thousand with the Leave of Allah.
And Allah is with As-Sabirin (the patient ones, etc.). |
Be patient,
Allah always helps Moslems even when they are in the minority |
|
It is not for a
Prophet that he should have prisoners of war (and free them with ransom)
until he had made a great slaughter (among his enemies) in the
land. You desire the good of this world (i.e. the money of ransom for freeing
the captives), but Allah desires (for you) the Hereafter. And Allah is
All-Mighty, All-Wise. |
Slaughter
your enemies before taking prisoners….. |
Sura 5 and 8 are mostly hate speech. There is nothing ‘religious’ in either
chapter. They are simply demands for
war, plunder and domination.
Sura 3 is a good illustration as to why the cult of
Muhammadism is the following:
§
Intolerant
§
Violent against Jews and Christians
§
Tautological [Muhammad’s family deity says Muhammad is the most
important messenger in history]
§
Dictatorial [you must follow Al Lah and Muhammad]
Islam forbids the worship of Judaism and
Christianity [3-104]. If worship of ‘false
gods’ and the Trinity is outlawed with Muhammadism, it logically follows that
there will be intolerance and violence against these 2 religions.
Jews and
Christians are liars |
O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians): "Why
do you mix truth with falsehood and conceal the truth while you
know?" |
|
Jews and
Christians cannot be trusted |
And a
party of the people of the Scripture say: "Believe in the morning in
that which is revealed to the believers (Muslims), and reject it at the end
of the day, so that they may turn back. |
|
Islam is selected
and predetermined to rule |
He
selects for His Mercy (Islam and the Qur'an with Prophethood) whom He wills
and Allah is the Owner of Great Bounty. |
|
Jews and
Christians are liars and untrustworthy |
Among the
people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians) is he who, if
entrusted with a Cantar (a great amount of wealth, etc.), will readily pay it
back; and among them there is he who, if entrusted with a single silver coin,
will not repay it unless you constantly stand demanding, because they say: "There is no blame on us to betray
and take the properties of the illiterates (Arabs)." But they tell a lie
against Allah while they know it. |
|
Submit to Allah
fulfil your pledges including Jihad [2:216] |
Yes,
whoever fulfils his pledge and fears Allah much; verily, then Allah loves
those who are Al-Muttaqun (the pious - see V.2:2). |
|
Unless you are
Moslem you will have a painful existence and death |
Verily,
those who purchase a small gain at the cost of Allah's Covenant and their
oaths, they shall have no portion in the Hereafter (Paradise). Neither will
Allah speak to them, nor look at them on the Day of Resurrection, nor will He
purify them, and they shall have a
painful torment. |
|
Jews and
Christians must submit to Muhammadism since Yahweh and God are really Baal
the moon deity of Mecca [Al Lah] |
Say (O
Muhammad SAW): "We believe in Allah and in what has been sent down to
us, and what was sent down to Ibrahim (Abraham), Isma'il (Ishmael), Ishaque
(Isaac), Ya'qub (Jacob) and Al-Asbat [the twelve sons of Ya'qub (Jacob)] and what was given to Musa (Moses), 'Iesa
(Jesus) and the Prophets from their Lord. We make no distinction between one
another among them and to Him (Allah) we have submitted (in Islam)." |
|
Save yourself by
converting to Muhammadism |
Except
for those who repent after that and do
righteous deeds. Verily, Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful. |
|
Your conversion
has to be total [Submission] |
Verily, those who disbelieved after their Belief
and then went on increasing in their disbelief (i.e. disbelief in the Qur'an
and in Prophet Muhammad SAW) - never
will their repentance be accepted [because they repent only by their tongues
and not from their hearts]. And they are those who are astray. |
|
You go to hell if
you are not a Moslem |
Verily, those who disbelieved, and died while
they were disbelievers, the (whole) earth full of gold will not be
accepted from anyone of them even if they offered it as a ransom. For them is a painful torment and
they will have no helpers. |
|
Jewws and
Christians are destined for torment |
Then
after that, whosoever shall invent a
lie against Allah, ... such shall indeed be the Zalimun (disbelievers). |
|
Judaism is superseded
by Muhammadism |
Say (O
Muhammad SAW): "Allah has spoken the truth; follow the religion of
Ibrahim (Abraham) Hanifa (Islamic Monotheism, i.e. he used to worship Allah
Alone), and he was not of Al-Mushrikun." (See V.2:105) |
|
Jews and
Christians pervert the ‘truth’ of Muhammadism |
O you who
believe! If you obey a group of those
who were given the Scripture (Jews and Christians), they would (indeed)
render you disbelievers after you have believed! |
|
Muhammadans must
hold firm to Koran worship |
And how
would you disbelieve, while unto you are recited the Verses of Allah, and
among you is His Messenger (Muhammad SAW)? And whoever holds firmly to Allah,
(i.e. follows Islam Allah's Religion, and obeys all that Allah has ordered,
practically), then he is indeed guided to a Right Path. |
|
Obey Allah [or
Muhammad] |
O you who
believe! Fear Allah (by doing all that He has ordered and by abstaining from
all that He has forbidden) as He should be feared. [Obey Him, be thankful to
Him, and remember Him always], and die
not except in a state of Islam (as Muslims) with complete submission to
Allah. |
|
Moslems cannot be
divided |
And hold
fast, all of you together, to the Rope of Allah (i.e. this Qur'an), and be
not divided among yourselves and remember Allah's Favour on you, for you were
enemies one to another but He joined your hearts together, so that, by His
Grace, you became brethren (in Islamic Faith), and you were on the brink of a
pit of Fire, and He saved you from it. Thus Allah makes His Ayat (proofs,
evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.,) clear to you, that you
may be guided. |
|
Judaism and
Christianity are forbidden |
Let there
arise out of you a group of people inviting to all that is good (Islam),
enjoining Al-Ma'ruf (i.e. Islamic Monotheism and all that Islam orders one to
do) and forbidding Al-Munkar
(polytheism and disbelief and all that Islam has forbidden). And it is they
who are the successful. |
|
Even if Muhammad
dies you must still worship Baal and the Koran |
Muhammad
(SAW) is no more than a Messenger, and indeed (many) Messengers have passed
away before him. If he dies or is killed, will you then turn back on your
heels (as disbelievers)? And he who
turns back on his heels, not the least harm will he do to Allah, and Allah
will give reward to those who are grateful. |
Sura
3 has plenty of violence and hate in it (27% of the text is hate speech). The above is just a sample.
Big brains wonder why the cult of Muhammad hates,
destroys, kills, attacks, crucifies and sex slaves the Infidel. They are too clever to read Mein Koran and
understand.
Jihad and war is mandatory within Mein Muhammadism
or Islam (Submission to Baal, or Muhammad). 2:216 makes this clear (as does
3:142):
2:216: Jihad (holy fighting in
Allah's Cause) is ordained for you (Muslims) though you dislike it, and it
may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and that you like a thing
which is bad for you. Allah knows but you do not know.
Sura 3 recounts the early battles of Muhammad. Badr in 624
should have been a defeat but improbable luck and some courage allowed the
Muhammadans to prevail. ‘Remember Badr’
is still a Moslem war-cry to this day. Contrary
to Moslem lies, Badr was not a defensive battle, but a Moslem attack on a rich
caravan. Today ‘historians’ twist themselves
into various shapes in their lies that Badr was somehow a battle Muhammad did
not want. Badr lies far way from the Moslem
base at Medina on the rich caravan routes.
The Moslems as always, were plundering.
“The
account goes on to say that some of the Muslims were reluctant to
participate in the attack because they did not want to go to war.
Muhammad later refers to these peaceful Muslims as ‘Hypocrites’ in the Qur’an,
where he also condemns them to Hell and demands that true Muslims deal with
them harshly (66:9).
After Muhammad sent his men to attack the caravan, Abu Sufyan (his
Meccan adversary) learned of his plans:
When he got near to the Hijaz, Abu Sufyan was seeking news and
questioning every rider in his anxiety, until he got news from some riders that
Muahmmad had called out his companions against him and his caravan. (Ibn
Ishaq/Hisham 428)
Muhammad himself declared that the Meccans were simply trying to protect
their property: The Quraysh have come to protect their horsemen. (Tabari,
Volume V11, p.31)”
In revenge for this unprovoked attacked the Meccans
sent out a strong force to take Medina. Uhud
a few miles from Medina saw the Meccans in 625 attack the Moslems but were
unable to decisively defeat them.
Muhammad’s totalitarian control of Medinah remained absolute.
Sura 3 remembers these battles including the ‘angels
of Allah’ who fought at the side of the Moslems at Badr (3:124). 3:152-156 discusses the flight of the Meccans
at both Badr [some fled] as well as at Uhud, with Allah commenting that the
Moslems loved ‘booty’ too much; and that fleeing in the face of the Meccans was
a ‘test’ from Allah, induced by Shaitun or Satan; and was thus dismissed as a
problem. Uhud was at best a draw, and
more likely a Moslem defeat. But Allah
all-knowing, all-wise, used Uhud as a ‘test’ of the faith of the Moslems,
blaming their ‘evil deeds’ for the poor performance of the Moslem army (3:165).
And
(remember) when you (Muhammad SAW) left your household in the morning to post the believers at their stations for
the battle (of Uhud). And Allah is All-Hearer, All-Knower. |
|
And Allah has already made you victorious at
Badr, when you were a weak little force. So fear Allah much [abstain from
all kinds of sins and evil deeds which He has forbidden and love Allah much,
perform all kinds of good deeds which He has ordained] that you may be
grateful. |
|
(Remember)
when you (Muhammad SAW) said to the believers, "Is it not enough for you that your Lord (Allah) should help
you with three thousand angels; sent down?" |
|
"Yes,
if you hold on to patience and piety,
and the enemy comes rushing at you; your Lord will help you with five
thousand angels having marks (of distinction)." |
|
Allah
made it not but as a message of good news for you and as an assurance to your
hearts. And there is no victory except
from Allah, the All-Mighty, the All-Wise. |
|
If a
wound (and killing) has touched you, be sure a similar wound (and killing)
has touched the others. And so are the days (good and not so good), We give
to men by turns, that Allah may test those who believe, and that He
may take martyrs from among you. And Allah likes not the Zalimun (polytheists
and wrongdoers). |
|
And that Allah may test (or purify) the
believers (from sins) and destroy the
disbelievers. |
|
Do you think that you will enter Paradise before
Allah tests those of you who fought (in His Cause) and
(also) tests those who are As-Sabirin (the patient ones, etc.)? |
|
You did
indeed wish for death (AshShahadah - martyrdom) before you met it. Now you
have seen it openly with your own eyes. |
|
And many
a Prophet (i.e. many from amongst the Prophets) fought (in Allah's Cause) and along with him (fought) large bands of
religious learned men. But they never lost heart for that which did
befall them in Allah's Way, nor did they weaken nor degrade themselves. And
Allah loves As-Sabirin (the patient ones, etc.). |
|
And Allah did indeed fulfil His Promise to
you when you were killing them (your enemy) with His Permission; until (the moment) you lost your courage and
fell to disputing about the order, and
disobeyed after He showed you (of the booty) which you love. Among you
are some that desire this world and some that desire the Hereafter. Then He made you flee from them (your enemy),
that He might test you. But surely, He forgave you, and Allah is Most
Gracious to the believers. |
|
(And remember) when you ran away (dreadfully)
without even casting a side glance at anyone, and the Messenger (Muhammad
SAW) was in your rear calling you back. There did Allah give you one
distress after another by way of requital
to teach you not to grieve for that which had escaped you, nor for that
which had befallen you. And Allah is Well Aware of all that you do. |
|
Then
after the distress, He sent down security for you. Slumber overtook a party
of you, while another party was thinking about themselves (as how to save
their ownselves, ignoring the others and the Prophet SAW) and thought wrongly
of Allah - the thought of ignorance. They said, "Have we any part in the
affair?" Say you (O Muhammad SAW): "Indeed the affair belongs
wholly to Allah." They hide within themselves what they dare not reveal
to you, saying: "If we had anything to do with the affair, none of us
would have been killed here." Say: "Even if you had remained in
your homes, those for whom death was decreed would certainly have gone forth
to the place of their death," but that Allah might test what is in your
breasts; and to Mahis that which was in your hearts (sins), and Allah is
AllKnower of what is in (your) breasts. |
|
Those of you who turned back on the day the two
hosts met (i.e. the battle of Uhud), it was Shaitan (Satan) who
caused them to backslide (run away from the battlefield) because of some
(sins) they had earned. But Allah, indeed, has forgiven them. Surely, Allah
is OftForgiving, Most Forbearing. |
|
O you who
believe! Be not like those who
disbelieve (hypocrites) and who say to their brethren when they travel
through the earth or go out to fight: "If they had stayed with us,
they would not have died or been killed," so that Allah may make it a
cause of regret in their hearts. It is Allah that gives life and causes
death. And Allah is AllSeer of what you do. |
|
And if you are killed or die in the Way of
Allah, forgiveness and mercy from Allah are far better than all that they
amass (of worldly wealths, etc.). |
|
And
whether you die, or are killed, verily, unto Allah you shall be gathered. |
|
(What is
the matter with you?) When a single
disaster smites you, although you smote (your enemies) with one twice as
great, you say: "From where does this come to us?" Say (to them),
"It is from yourselves (because of your evil deeds)." And Allah
has power over all things. |
|
And what
you suffered (of the disaster) on the day (of the battle of Uhud when) the
two armies met, was by the leave of
Allah, in order that He might test the believers. |
|
And that He might test the hypocrites, it was
said to them: "Come, fight in the
Way of Allah or (at least) defend yourselves." They said: "Had
we known that fighting will take place, we would certainly have followed
you." They were that day, nearer to disbelief than to Faith, saying with
their mouths what was not in their hearts. And Allah has full knowledge of
what they conceal. |
|
Think not
of those who are killed in the Way of Allah as dead. Nay, they are alive,
with their Lord, and they have provision. |
|
Those who answered (the Call of) Allah and the
Messenger (Muhammad SAW) after being wounded; for
those of them who did good deeds and feared Allah, there is a great reward. |
|
Those
(i.e. believers) unto whom the people (hypocrites) said, "Verily, the
people (pagans) have gathered against you (a great army), therefore, fear
them." But it (only) increased them in Faith, and they said: "Allah
(Alone) is Sufficient for us, and He is the Best Disposer of affairs (for
us)." |
It is a lie when Moslems say that there is no ‘Jihad’
as committed by ISIS, Boko Harem, or any number of Moslem organisations around
the world; who slaughter in the name of Baal the Meccan moon deity [Al Lah or
the Lord].
Consider this fact.
Lesser Jihad, or the Jihad of war, is mandatory within the cult of Islam
or Submission. It is a duty to wage
Jihad against the Unbelievers, see 2:216.
This demand runs rife and riot within Mein Koran. Witness Sura 2 below, which contains 2:256
which begs the Meccan elite that there ‘is no compulsion in religion’. But read the text below. There is plenty of compulsion with Muhammad’s
cult. Compulsion to the point of death,
if you deny Muhammadism’s supremacy. Moslems lie when they claim they don’t
compulse. Only a witless fool believes
that.
Sura 2:
And fight in the Way of Allah those who fight you, but
transgress not the limits. Truly, Allah likes not the transgressors. [This
Verse is the first one that was revealed in connection with Jihad, but it was
supplemented by another (V.9:36)]. |
|
And kill them wherever you find them, and
turn them out from where they have turned you out. And Al-Fitnah is worse
than killing. And fight not with them at Al-Masjid-al-Haram (the sanctuary at
Makkah), unless they (first) fight you there. But if they attack you, then
kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers. |
|
And fight them until there is no more Fitnah
(disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah) and (all and every
kind of) worship is for Allah (Alone). But if they cease, let there be no
transgression except against Az-Zalimun (the polytheists, and wrong-doers,
etc.) |
|
Jihad (holy fighting in Allah's Cause) is
ordained for you (Muslims) though you
dislike it, and it may be that you dislike a thing which is good for you and
that you like a thing which is bad for you. Allah knows but you do not know. |
|
They ask you concerning fighting in the Sacred
Months (i.e. 1st, 7th, 11th and 12th months of the Islamic calendar). Say,
"Fighting therein is a great (transgression) but a greater
(transgression) with Allah is to prevent mankind from following the Way of
Allah, to disbelieve in Him, to prevent access to Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at
Makkah), and to drive out its inhabitants, and Al-Fitnah is worse than
killing. And they will never cease fighting you until they turn you back from
your religion (Islamic Monotheism) if they can. And whosoever of you turns
back from his religion and dies as a disbeliever, then his deeds will be lost
in this life and in the Hereafter, and they will be the dwellers of the Fire.
They will abide therein forever." |
|
And fight in the Way of Allah and know
that Allah is All-Hearer, All-Knower. |
About 1/3 of the Koran is violent hate speech.
Consider the Koran or ‘Recital’ and its lack of tolerance.
There are no universal ‘laws’ about toleration of
non-Moslems. None. Be nice to Moslems and kill or dominate the
rest. This is the theme of Mein
Koran. The only sentence fragment that can
be considered conciliatory is 2:256 when Muhammad begs the Meccans to leave his
newly formed and quite obnoxious cult alone.
But, if you read before 2:256 and after, you will notice that half the
chapter is hate speech against non-Moslems.
The entreaty that there is no compulsion in religion, is followed by a
page of why Islam will conquer and that if an unbeliever had intelligence, he
would join the cult [or else].
Take the word Jihad.
There are 2 forms of Jihad in Muhammad’s cult. The Greater Jihad is to purify oneself and
follow Muhammadan edicts embedded in Mein Koran. The Lesser Jihad, is to kill and slaughter
non-Moslems, and bring the non-Moslem world under Moslem domination.
Jihad as a word only appears 4 times in the Koran. But
in the first half of the book roughly from Sura 2 to 25, the idea of Jihad
appears no less than 153 times. There are 2925 verses in the first 25
chapters of Muhammad's totalitarian template, named Recital. 153 verses makes 5%. It is impossible for Moslems and Moslemophiles to make the claim that the
cult of Submission is about peace. Fully 5% of the most important chapters in
the Koran discuss Jihad and wiping out, destroying, eradicating, fighting and
killing Unbelievers – ALL Unbelievers. No other cult document or one purporting
to religious aspiration, even comes close to this level of outright intolerance. A
further 21 % openly avow violence against the Unbeliever. Each chapter is
consistently violent.
The Jihadic verses can be found here, feel free to
read them in Mein Koran:
|
|
# in Sura |
Aggregate
# |
002 |
178-179,
190-191, 193-194, 216-218, 244 |
10 |
10 |
003 |
121-126,
140-143, 146, 152-158, 165-167, 169, 172-173, 195 |
25 |
35 |
004 |
14, 30, 31, 37, 38, 42, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 50, 51, 52, 53, 55, 56, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 84, 88, 89, 93, 95, 104, 115, 117, 121, 137, 138, 139, 140, 141, 142, 144, 145, 151, 155, 157, 161, 167, 168, 169, 170 | 47 | 82 |
005 |
033, 035,
082 |
3 |
85 |
008 |
001, 005,
007, 009-010, 012, 015-017, 039-048, 057-060, 065-075 |
34 |
119 |
009 |
005,
012-014, 016, 019-020, 024-026, 029, 036, 038-039, 041, 044, 052, 073, 081,
083, 086, 088, 092, 111, 120, 122-123 |
27 |
146 |
016 |
110 |
1 |
147 |
022 |
039, 058,
078 |
3 |
150 |
024 |
053, 055 |
2 |
152 |
025 |
052 |
1 |
153 |
Where did the Koran come from?
Which humans made it? What are the historical antecedents for the writing of
the Koran? Why is it littered with so many mistakes, nonsense, racism,
surpemacism and violence? Why do Moslems believe that a moon deity Hub'Allah made
it? Why don't they study it as a historical document? Why do Western
ignoramuses accept the claim that the ilah [the one] created it?
Moslems worship the Koran with a devotion that
borders on the irrational and mystical. As one author described it, the Koran
"....is the holy of holies. It
must never rest beneath other books, but always on top of them, one must never
drink or smoke when it is being read aloud, and it must be listened to in
silence. It is a talisman against disease and disaster." For
Moslems the Koran is simply the most important set of injunctions ever written
down – some 1400 years ago.......
In times past the Koran was ridiculed within the
Western world and anyone who has read the Koran would know why. Today of course
a moon deity premised and pre-modern ritualized cult is recast as a religion.
Gibbon the arch anti-religious and cult zealot described Muhammad's project and
manual as an “incoherent rhapsody of fable.” 'Great Man' theorist Thomas
Carlyle found the Koran an “insupportable stupidity”. Scholar Reinach wrote:
“From the literary point of view, the Koran has little merit. Declamation,
repetition, puerility, a lack of logic and coherence strike the unprepared
reader at every turn. It is humiliating to the human intellect to think that
this mediocre literature has been the subject of innumerable commentaries, and
that millions of men are still wasting time absorbing it.”
All
true. The Koran is adolescent, irreligious cult dogma. It is a violent
anti-humanist rant, which finds its corollary in Mein Kampf.
The Koran was created to form a
cult of rabid devotion to Muhammad through the worship of an ilah or El-Lah, namely
the one. In reading the Koran, both Allah and Muhammad seem interchangeable.
This makes sense since Muhammad was the ilah's only spokesmen and whatever
Muhammad wanted, the ilah also supported and vice-versa. It is certainly fair
to state that Allah is another name for Muhammad.
When the 'great man' Muhammad
died, four of his companions succeeded him as leaders of the Islamic cult. The
last of these four was bizarrely both his cousin and his son in law. He was
murdered by a rival named Muawiya in 661 A.D. and Muawiya became the first of
the Ummayad caliphs an empire which lasted until 750 A.D. The Umayyads were
deposed by the ‘Abbasids, who lasted in Iraq and Baghdad until the thirteenth
century.
The Ummayads were termed 'godless'
and had little inclination to Islamic totalitarianism. The Abbasids were
'purer' and regarded themselves as religious [or more accurately in the case of
Islam cult] fanatics. It was the Abbasids who invented the Hadiths or the
sayings of the great man Muhammad. The most 'legitimate' of the Abbasid writers
of the Hadiths was of course Bukhari who lived during the 8th century
– at the time of the Abbasid revolt. As one historian pithily reported:
“The ruling power [the Ummayads]
itself was not idle. If it wished an opinion to be generally recognized and the
opposition of pious circles silenced [the Abbasids]; it too had to know how to
discover a hadith to suit its purpose. They had to do what their opponents did:
invent and have invented, hadiths in their turn. And that is in effect what
they did."
In other words once the Abbasids
got the story telling rolling, the Ummayads responded in a like-minded manner.
Both sides had story-tellers who made a good living inventing 'what the Prophet
said and did....' Like medieval chansons de gestes, the Moslem troubadours
regaled their audiences with the most minute facts about everything Muhammad
said, did, wanted and alluded to. The most intricate details of his toiletry
and defecation are even recorded. Rituals, prayers, positions, prostrations and
mumblings all to support the pious school [Abbasids] or the ruling temporal
powers [Ummayads] issued forth. Seen in this light Bukhari's works are
political pieces of propaganda and are merely one of some 200 such sets of
'traditions', all of whom were invented some 200 years after Muhammad had
expired.
The perspicacious Islamicist,
Joseph Schacht, whose works on Islamic law are considered classics in the field
of Islamic studies and are a must read, stated the following [my summary only]:
1. The
'isnads' [the chain of transmitters] going all the way back to Muhammad only
began to be developed during the Abbasid revolt —i.e., the mid-8th century;
2. That
ironically, the more elaborate and formally correct an isnad appeared to be,
the more likely it was to be spurious.
3. “No
existing hadith could be reliably ascribed to the prophet, though some of them
might ultimately be rooted in his teaching.” [quote from Schacht]
4. The
great majority of traditions from the Muhammadan era are documents which date
not from Muhammad's life time but from much later stages in the development of
the totalitarian doctrines which made up Islamic 'law' in succeeding centuries.
The Koran and the Hadiths are very
much man-created. The Hadiths purport to explain the Koran, but they were
created some 200 years after Muhammad died. How accurate can they be, based as
they are on testimony and investigation during a time of 8th century
civil war? How accurate do you think the oral tradition lasting some 200 years
was by 750 AD? What implications do the above facts have for Islam, Muhammadan
law, and the concept of modern Sharia and Islamic liturgy?
10 million whites were enslaved by Moslems. Black slavery is still practised in the wonderful moon cult of Mecca's conquered and plundered territories in Africa and parts of Asia. Some 25 million Blacks – some estimates are at 200 million - have disappeared in the peaceful, tolerant, nirvana of Muhammadist society. Slavery is sanctioned in Mein Koran, with Moslems owning non Moslems with their 'right hand'. Sex slavery of Infidels by Moslems abounds in Western states, with girls as young as 8 years old being traded and sold for sex in places like the UK. No worries, Moslems are always relabelled in the UK and other states as 'Asian' or 'disaffected youth'.
The media – those pious practitioners of truth – and the politicians – those earnest beacons of love and light; along with the 'quackademics' – those practitioners of 'science' and enlightenment – would never utter a word against their favorite fascism. But the average person is now becoming aware of the extent of Moslem rapacity, the Moslem cult's addiction to sex slavery, its hatred of the Infidel, its blood lust to exterminate all who do not raise buttocks in the air to Baal-Muhammad, the moon deity and Fuehrer of a pagan bronze-age inspired cult.
An academic who is not a quack and who has produced illuminating work on the massive extent of Moslem slavery – sexual as well as skin based – is Robert Davis of Ohio University. One of his books is reviewed here 'Christian Slaves, Moslem Masters'.
'The jihadic aspect of the slave trade is quite apparent in the brutality of the Muslim incursions along the European coasts. Whole towns, regions and coastal areas were denuded. Much of littoral Italy was left seriously under- or even de-populated as people moved to the highlands and into walled cities. Raids taking whole villages and thousands of slaves at one time were almost annual events. The Muslim raiders also used terror along the coasts, destroying shrines, churches, monasteries and any imagery or structures that had a religious importance. Booty, gold, art and any worthwhile artifact which might help pay for the expedition was also taken. [p. 41]
The Muslim obsession with White slavery was also fuelled by the need to have slaves man their galleys.'
Davis estimates that 2-3 million whites were taken as slaves by Moslems just in North Africa and Ottoman Turkey alone, between 1500-1780. If we add in pre-1500, and include Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Europe, then calculate in the modern era, the sex slaving of white women by Moslems; than the total of white slaves taken by Moslems is at least 10 million over 1400 years. The culling of Blacks is significantly greater, but that won't stop American Blacks converting to Islam, like their hero the racist Muhammad Ali who belonged, to the Nation of Islam, a racist – Black Moslem group whose objective is to turn America into a Black Caliphate and eliminate all whites.
His new book focuses on the enslavement within North Africa and the Ottoman 'empire' [Moslems squatting on other people's land]; as a case of Infidelophobia, or the culling of non Moslems as sex slaves, galley slaves, or labor for mines. This means of course that Islam is peace and love and what about Dances with Wolves and the American treatment of Indians ?
Of course one should never expect a quackademic, or politician, or one of the many 'experts' wearing bags over their heads to comment on Moslem enslavement of non-Moslems, or Muhammadism's racism and supremacism; nor on Black Moslem racism against whites. Doing so means you are not a 'scientist' and are intolerant.