Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.
After the Muslim victory at Manzikert in 1071 A.D., the enslavement, slaughter and rape of Christians inside and near to the Muslim state reached biblical levels. A French priest wrote in the late 11th century, “Far and wide (Muslim Turks) ravaged cities and castles together with their settlements. Churches were razed down to the ground. Of the clergymen and monks whom they captured, some were slaughtered while others were with unspeakable wickedness given up….” The Muslim Turks had taken over the most fertile and important manpower areas of the Byzantine empire after Manzikert. Entire areas and populations were forced to accept the Muhammandan cult or face depredations, enslavement, rape or even death.
There was no tolerance and no golden age. Byzantium’s Emperor Alexios I Comnenos (1081-1118) lamented that, “The holy places are desecrated and destroyed…Noble matrons and their daughters….violated one after another like animals….even bishops are defiled with the sin of sodomy…” The Muslims sought out to not only destroy Christian Byzantium but to defile, mock, degrade and absolutely debase it and its adherents in the most demonic ways imaginable. No criticism of such savagery exists today of this sordid chapter in history. None will be tolerated.
The atrocities committed by Muslims post-Manzikert included the lands of Anatolia, Syria, Palestine, and Armenia. Christian pilgrims to Jerusalem, wrote Michael the Syrian, were easy prey for the Muslim Turks. Many female pilgrims were raped, some in the view of the pilgrimage group until the woman died from the repeated assaults. Other pilgrims were simply murdered, and their few possessions taken. Some others were tortured for sport. The Turks were simply following centuries of examples set by Muslim Arabs. It was nothing new. For example Caliph Hakim Allah (996-1021) ordered the destruction of 30.000 churches in Egypt and Syria including the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. A persecution that was one of an endless array enacted by Muslims against Christians. However, by the 1090s after Manzikert, the Christophobia enacted by Muslims seemed to reach a crescendo. The demonic assaults against Christians and their edifices and culture were so lurid and so evil that even the usually apathetic Western states and its Church took notice.
The Muslim Turk and their endemic, obsessive Christophobia is the context for Pope Urban II’s November 27 1095 call for a religious war, a Crusade to save the Church in the East. Pope Urban II said inter-alia, “They (Muslim Turks) have completely destroyed some of God’s churches and they havre converted others to the uses of their own cult. They ruin altars with filth and defilement….They are pleased to kill others by cutting open their bellies, extracting the ends of their intestines, and tying it to a stake….And what shall I say about the shocking rape of women? Rise up and remember the manly deeds of your ancestors…Deus le Veult” God wills it said Urban. God demands a Crusade to save Christianity and those afflicted by the demonic assaults of Muslims. Save Christian siblings demanded Urban II. Can you imagine anyone in the modern Catholic Church stating even a jot or iota of these sentiments today? The modern Church would blame the victims.
By 1095, the Western world had changed. The states and empires of the West, forged in the smithy of Christianity, were by this time advanced civilisations. They were wealthy, agriculturally ahead of the rest of the world, technology and invention abounded in all spheres of life, it was the age that would birth universities, eyeglasses, blast furnaces and the heavily armoured mounted knight, basically an impenetrably tailored muscular warrior on a protected steed, an early form of mobile tank.
Western civilisation had been at the mercy of the Muslim Jihad for centuries. Its coastal areas depopulated and raided. Most of Spain and southern France taken, occupied, and devastated. The once Romano-Christian areas of North Africa which before the Muslim Jihad were appendages of the Christian Roman empire and tied by trade and culture to the eternal city, were conquered, occupied, looted and destroyed by Muslims. The once rich societies and their economies eviscerated never to recover which is why North Africa is a mess and a wasteland in the modern era. By 1095 the feudal warrior states of Western Christianity had had enough of Muhammad’s cult and its endless frenzied and psychotic Jihad. As St Augustine stated, “It is the injustice of the opposing side, that lays on the wise man the duty to wage war.” Nicely stated and true. The only way to end the Muslim Jihad is to annihilate it in war.
The Seljuks were Turks who converted to the Muhammandan cult in the 10th century. They were not the first group within the Muhammadan cult(s) to use slave soldiers, enabling and implementing the idea of chattel-soldiery during the 10th and 11th centuries. Arab Muslims ruling in Syria and Anatolia had used slave soldiers to great effect as early as the 9th century (in for example, the complete destruction of Christian Amorium). Later during the 14th century and beyond the Ottomans became the most successful with the idea of using chattel as military, until their slaves became the masters, or the arbiters of power during the 17th century and beyond. Scanderbeg the great 15th century Albanian-Christian leader who resisted Ottoman depredations for 25 years, was formerly a ransomed child slave and forced lover of a depraved Ottoman Sultan who enjoyed young boys, along with the unlimited numbers of White Christian and other sex concubines categorised meekly and inoffensively as a ‘harem’. As if being a sex slave was enriching and a path to better things in life.
The Turks were used in the 9th century and perhaps earlier as slave soldiers for the Arab-Muslim rulers or Caliphs in the Near East. They were chosen for their bravery, loyalty and savagery in battle. As with other nomadic people, the cult of Muhammadan resonated with them, and the Turkic tribes converted en masse during the 9th century. Ibn Khaldun always referenced as a Muslim polymath and genius descried the Arabs as stupid and wild, and the Turks as ravenous wolves who loved Jihad and the destruction of Infidels. The allure of Jihad, the plunder, the rape, the women as sex slaves, the squatting on higher civilisations such as Christian Byzantium magnetised and obsessed the Muslim Turk. In the Turkish Book of Dede Korkut, the Turks combined their pagan practices with Muhammadanism including a particular love for Jihad, “I shall raid the bloody infidels’ land, I shall cut off heads and spill blood, I shall make the infidel vomit blood, I shall bring back slaves and slave-girls.” Not much nuance or misunderstanding here.
By the early 11th century, the Muslim Seljuk Turkish tribe was the key power in the Muslim Near East. The Seljuks seized power and the torch of Jihad. The 11th century was the era of Holy War, with the Muslim zeal for the complete destruction of Christianity at a zenith, matching that of the early 7th century Arab Muslim Jihad invasions of Christian territory. The bloodthirsty ‘beasts’ of Islam, the Turks, made their baleful, evil presence felt first in Christian Armenia. Byzantium had sent much of the wealth and manpower out of Armenia back to Constantinople. By 1049 the Seljuks were running amok in Armenia, putting the large Christian city of Arzden to the torch, slaughtering over a 100.000 and enslaving the remainder.
Over 800 churches were burnt down. Priests were burnt in churches and nuns raped on altars, a particular Muslim enjoyment. A camel train stretching to almost 1000 was needed to cart out the plunder. In 1065 the Muslim Turks laid siege to the Armenian capital of Ani. The earth apparently trembled with the usage of the Muslims huge siege weapons. Once inside the entire city was put to the sword or enslaved. These are just some examples of what transpired in Armenia during the 11th century and beyond. Hundreds of thousands of Christians killed, raped and hundreds of thousands more enslaved by the Muslim Turk, just in one area (Armenia and eastern Byzantium) and just within one generation. No need for Turks to bend knees to Christians today.
The apogee of Muslim rapine and carnage was actualised in 1071 at the battle of Manzikert. The Muslim Turks had tried unsuccessfully to invest the Anatolian city in 1054. Manzikert was a key stronghold in eastern Anatolia and nearby Armenia, an extremely large, prosperous and well-fortified city. Constantinople did little to help the eastern borders of their empire, the raids became deeper, more savage and destructive by the year. The peasant Anatolian farmer who supplied not only food, but much of the Byzantine army, was being killed, wounded, exiled or forced off his estate. The army and economy thus suffered terribly. In 1070 the new Byzantine emperor Romanus lead an assault to turn back the Jihad. He expelled the Muslims from Cappadocia, and near Lake Van in Armenia wiped out a Muslim army. Due to an internal revolt in the West, Romanus withdrew, and the Muslims took advantage finally conquering Manzikert just north of Lake Van. Romanus responded by assembling a mammoth mostly-mercenary army and marched forth from Constantinople to confront the Muslim Turks at Manzikert.
Romanus recaptured Manzikert and divided his considerable forces into 3 parts. One large force under the Norman leader Bailleul, was charged with taking Khilat to the south of Manzikert. A large Muslim army of some 40.000 calvary confronted Bailleul who withdrew not to Manzikert but to the north west and safety. The Muslim Turks then rode onto Manzikert. Romanus had begun marching to Khilat to link up with Bailleul when he was surrounded by the Muslim legions under their commander Muhammad. On August 26 1071 the two armies met near Manzikert. The Turkish horse used light calvary tactics of hit and run, shooting volumes of arrows at the Byzantine infantry and disappearing. The terrain was to the Muslim advantage. They could gallop forward, fire their arrows, and disappear, while the heavily armoured Byzantine infantry plodded forward. The Muslims had unlimited land to work with, there were no natural barriers to obstruct their tactics.
It was treachery that doomed the Byzantine Christians. Intrigues had formed groups opposed to Romanus. During the battle the general leading the rear of the army, fled the scene, apparently citing the reversed standards of Romanus as proof he had been killed, when in fact he was alive and fighting with the standards displayed as they should be during battle. Once the rear army fled, the remainder panicked. Romanus and his remaining loyal rump were surrounded and cut down by the Turks. The Byzantine emperor was taken prisoner and most of the soldiers who stood with him were put to the sword either during or after the battle.
The outcome of Manzikert was as decisive as that of Yarmuk for the Arabs in 636 A.D. The Turks conquered Anatolia, Asia minor, Nicaea not far from Constantinople and Ephesus. The Byzantine empire was near death. Hundreds of thousands if not more Christians were killed, enslaved, or forced to convert to Muhammadanism in once Christian lands. The Byzantines lost their most fertile and productive areas and their largest sources of manpower. It was a disaster that would take until 1453 to formally play itself out.
Christian Byzantium and Christian Constantinople were the wealthiest, most sophisticated, advanced, cultured and educated entities in the world in the 11th century. This ‘golden age’ far outshone anything offered by the Muslim slave empires, either current or past. A Turkish epic from this period, declared in reverential awe the splendours of Christian Byzantium and the need to destroy it for the sake of Jihad: ‘….of all the places I have seen, I never saw a place like the land of the Rum (Byzantium)…May they pull down its monasteries and set up mosques and madrassas in their places.’
The Arab domination of the Meccan moon cult empire fast waned after 750 AD with the collapse of the Umayyad Caliphate. It was replaced by the Persian Muslim bureaucracy, with the military, the most important tool for social order, mostly of non-Arab origins. Many of the soldiers were slaves. The slave armies were voracious and vicious. In 838 AD, Armorium a rich Christian city near Armenia was assaulted by 80.000 or more Muslim slave soldiers, the walls were breached, the citizens raped and slaughtered, the pillage and looting monumental and thousands of white Christians became Muslim slaves (Michael the Syrian). The Muslims wrote that the bodies were heaped everywhere. Many Christians were roasted alive in public. Of the 70.000 citizens of Armorium, half were murdered, and the other half fell into slavery. It must have been a golden age of enrichment for the Armorians.
The destruction of Armorium had a tremendous effect on the entire Byzantine empire. The emperor during that period, Theophilus I, was from Armorium. The Muslims had chosen Armorium to be destroyed specifically to terrorise the emperor. He died 3 years after the annihilation of his home city, aged 28. The Byzantine military under a General named Bardas, took the offensive in 866 AD attacking the Muslims in modern day Iraq and along the coasts of the Levant and Egypt. Cyprus was liberated and a Muslim army eviscerated in Mesopotamia. The rise of a Bulgar empire during the 10th century distracted Byzantium from the Muslim threat, and forced it into a long era of wars, raids, treaties and expenditure.
Emperor Nikephorus II Phokas, in the early to mid-10th century, resumed the Christian Crusade against the Muslims. He was described as a great general, a Herculean figure, a powerful man in body and mind, severe in piety and religion, austere and brutal. He was born along the Anatolian frontier, an area devastated by the Muslims. He well knew the consequences of ‘enrichment’. Nikephorus won a long list of battles against the Muslim Jihad, including the liberation of Crete and wide swathes of Anatolia and Syria. He ordered his men to burn any copies of the execrable Muslim handbook of Jihad – the Koran.
The incessant warring had led to high taxation, and the usual Byzantine court of intrigues, disloyalty and gamesmanship was evident. Nikeophorus’ downfall was his wife’s doing. Dissatisfied with her monkish husband, famed for his all-night vigils and fasting, she became the lover of his nephew one John Tzimikes, who with a group of his men, murdered Nikephorus aged 57, late one night in 969, cutting off his head. Tzimikes became emperor and continued the Christian onslaught, taking many cities including Nazareth in Palestine and Syria. He met the same end as his predecessor, succeeded by Basil II, one of the great Christian conquerors in history. Under Basil II the Byzantine empire reached its greatest apogee of power. Basil II was known as the Bulgar slayer, reducing the empire and power of the Bulgars, as well as that of the weakened Muslim caliphate to the south and east.
Before the rise of the Ottomans, who would prove along with Tamerlane and the Mongols, to be an apogee of Muslim fanaticism, cruelty, ruthlessness and Jihad, the Christian Byzantine empire had achieved a century of great success, rolling back the Muslims in Asia, the Levant and the western Mediterranean. But as usual in history, apathy, civil discord, court intrigues, murders, depositions, corruption and immorality became endemic, post an era of expansion, success and peace. After Basil II internal dislocations and power seeking, including overt and covert civil wars within the civil bureaucracy took precedence. The threat of the Muslim Jihad was ignored. The military and related investments suffered. The lack of societal rigour, belief and commitment to the survival of the Christian empire ensured complacency and naivety. The threat of the Muslim Turk and its slave army was ignored, and its potency underestimated.
Most people don’t understand that the ‘West’ simply refers to the rump and remnant which remained of what was once a vast Christian-based collection of states, empires and cultures around the Mediterranean. The battle of Tours in 732 and the subsequent campaigns in the 730s by Charles Martel and the Franks, ended the Muslim threat of complete domination of Europe. This signal fact, this great accomplishment is of course under attack by post-modern ‘academics’ who write, without looking at primary sources or understanding the nature of medieval warfare that an invasion of 2 armies composing some 80.000 men was a ‘raid’. Yet Claudius conquered Britain with a fraction of that total, with William of Normandy repeating it a 1.000 years later with 10.000 men. The objective of the Muslim invasion of Provence and Burgundy was the destruction of Christianity in Frankish Gaul.
The Frankish eradication of the Muslim threat at Tours used to be celebrated. Historian Godefroid Kurth in the early 20th century proclaimed Tours as, ‘one of the greatest events in the history of the world, as upon its issue depended whether Christian Civilisation should continue or Islam prevail throughout Europe.’ In 718 the Roman-Christian Byzantines defeated the Muslim hordes at Constantinople. This victory stopped the Muslim takeover of the Byzantine empire. Fourteen years at Tours, a similar event occurred. The Muslim Jihad was mortally wounded at Tours and the Reconquista of Spain and parts of the Mediterranean could now commence.
The two-pronged Jihad from the Muslim masses were thus arrested at both ends of Europe.
Yet both victories at Constantinople in 718 and at Tours in 732 are linked. Leo the Lion who led the Christian forces at Constantinople had to suffer a year of siege warfare, with the Muslims besieging his capital with a force comprising no fewer than 100.000 men. The Muslims suffered through one of the harshest winters in that period, the raids of the Bulgars paid by Leo to attack the Muslim supply lines and depots, disease, starvation, and constant sallies by the defenders of the nigh impregnable city. Only 20.000 or so Arab Jihadis survived the siege of Constantinople. By contrast the 80.000 or so Berber-Arab Jihadis at Tours fled, routed and ruined, after a single day of combat. Their losses were enormous probably half were killed or injured. But if the Muslim Jihad against Constantinople had succeeded very likely the Franks would have been engaged on two fronts, against 2 enormous Muslim hordes and the outcome may have been different.
Spain’s first Muslim dictator or emir, bin Nusayr, is recorded as stating that he wanted the Muslim Jihad to conquer all of Europe, and he would begin in the Pyrenees and end in Constantinople. This circuit though ambitious was certainly plausible given the disunited state of Christendom and the fact that most of Germany and large tracts of Central and Eastern Europe were pagan, not Christian, and unreliable in the extreme as allies against a Muslim Jihad. The Muslims had destroyed Christianity from Arabia to the Pyrenees, conquering the eastern and southern parts of Christendom, and Spain. Why not the rest of the ‘West’ and North and East of what remained? When the Muslims under Rahman invaded France and headed for Tours in 732 AD, they brought with them their many wives, children, pack animals, moving as it were, ‘lock stock and barrel’, to colonise a new land.
This gives lie to the current ‘academic’ fascination that an 80.000 man force, composed of 2 armies, was a ‘raid’. French medievalist Dufourcq stated that the patten of Jihad was always the same, first reconnaissance, raid for booty and slaves, assess the strength of the target land in question, than launch an all-out attack with a view to conquering and colonising. So it was with Syria, North Africa, Spain and France. It is quite obvious that had Rahman defeated Charles at Tours, the Arab and Berber Muslims would have plundered the wealthy abbey at Tours, settled, expanded and proceeded to conquer the rest of Frankish Gaul.
Modern ‘$cience’ and ‘reason’ states that the medieval period was an unbroken sea of Darkness, an age of the broken, the depraved, the hair shirted fanatic, the unreasonable mystic, the ‘denier’ of rationality, the mentally infirm and debauched, and illiterate toothless idiots who talked to non-existent ‘friends’. The reign of Charlemagne or Charles the Great is hard to align with such a belief system. The Carolingian renaissance of the 9th century has its antecedents dating back to Clovis and the early 6th century, informed by the transformation of the Roman Empire, now deceased, into separate units, with extending ties of trade, commerce and ideas, a Europe which was revitalised once the dead weight of the Roman military state was lifted. Windmills now so much in vogue, are hardly new. They proliferated along with water mills post the Roman implosion as one example and benefit amongst many, in the ending of a parasitical tyrannical system.
In the 8th century, the Muslims were still threatening from the south, the Magyar or Huns from the east, and the first Viking raids from the north were commencing late in the century, much of that propelled by the white slave trade with the Muslim caliphs around the Mediterranean. In this milieu on Christmas day in 800, Charlemagne was crowned by Pope Leo III as first Holy Roman Emperor. Modern history was thus initiated.
Charlemagne effectively unified the ‘West’ or the rump of Christendom that was still free of the Muslim yoke. He was the quintessential Christian warrior, a crusader, who also built churches, schools, hospitals, orphanages, roads, cities, aqueducts, and artistic works. He is also remembered for maintaining cordial relations with the new Abbasid caliph in Baghdad, one Harun al Rashid, who had just taken over from the Ummayad dynasty, disgraced by the massive failures to take Constantinople (718). Einhard the biographer of Charlemagne stated he did this largely to make life tolerable for Christian dhimmis living in Muslim occupied territory of what was once a vast Christian empire. This included sending money and supplies to the beleaguered Christian populations in Muslim lands. Charlemagne also made a pilgrimage to Jerusalem where he built a hostel for travelling Christians, along with a library and church.
Charlemagne did campaign against the Muslims in Spain building a buffer zone around the Pyrenees and down the coast to Barcelona. This allowed him and the Holy Roman Empire the space and time needed to conquer the Frisians and Saxons and continue the Christianisation of Germany. The Muslims in Spain and North Africa directed their efforts elsewhere, realising that the might of the Franks could not be assaulted. In 846 post Charlemagne’s death, a Muslim fleet landed at Rome’s port, Ostia, and attacked the city. Unable to break in, they sacked and pillaged the surrounding countryside including the holy basilicas of St Paul and St Peter where Charlemagne had been crowned. The tombs of Peter and Paul were scandalised and vandalised, the basilicas stripped of their treasures and gold. Thus began a decades long investment and raiding on the Italian Tyrrhenian coast, with white slaves and easy treasure being the main objectives. Italian cities and families began to move inland to hilltop and mountaintop villages, a migration forced by Saracen depredation. Exorbitant ransom was paid to eject the Muslims from the Italian coastal areas including Ostia, which only served to stimulate more attacks.
Deterred by the power of the Frankish empire, the Muslims vented the energies of Jihad in the Western Mediterranean and on Italy and Sicily. In the 9th century the Muslims conquered the Balearics, Corsica, Crete, Cyprus, Malta, Sicily and Sardinia. All were utterly annihilated with massive destruction and endless thousands of white Christian slaves taken. In Crete in 826 for example, Muslims forced all Christians to convert to Muhammadanism, or be enslaved. The capital city Candia was turned into a white slave market.
The imposition of jizya or enormous taxation and its economic and social destruction, was matched by the thousands of destroyed churches and Christian buildings. Not only were Muslims content and amused by the evisceration of Christian culture, they absolutely delighted in profaning the same. In Salerno Sicily, during the Muslim siege, a virgin Christian nun was raped every evening on the altar in a Christian cathedral. These depredations and depravity are rarely mentioned today.
By the early 10th century, the once Romano-Christian Mediterranean had become a Muslim ‘lake’, the hunting ground of slavers, brigands and Jihadis. Ibn Khaldun the celebrated Muslim historian boasted that the Christians could not float a plank, and could do nothing to resist the Muslim fleets. The nature of the Muslim Jihad changed with the rise of Charlemagne and the Frankish Holy Roman Empire. The ‘easy’ riches found in Spain, southern France and the costs of Italy and the Mediterranean islands had been thoroughly plundered and taken. White slaves, women for the sex harems, young boys as eunuchs and warriors, men as galley rowers or slaves for mines, were now preferred. Hence the Viking onslaught in the north, partnered with the Muslim Jihad in the south. The Vikings enslaved many tens of thousands of White Christians and sent them south to the Muslim caliphates. This is a little remarked upon fact, certainly not to be found in the endless documentaries now seeking to rebrand the Vikings from vicious pagan warring criminals, into peaceful, humble, shy farmers.
‘Modern’ science’ states that the Muslim evisceration of Spain was a beatific golden age. Rapes, raids, beheadings, economic devastation, and the destruction of any building including large Cathedrals, bearing a cross or any sign of being Christian, was a high-water mark in man’s ‘evolution’, perhaps even surpassing the pagan-slave civilisation of Rome. Nothing was built by the Muslims in Spain. Cordoba’s existing city wall extended. Churches turned into mosques. The Alhambra in Granada designed and built by Christian slaves is the only building that the Muslimophile can point out for architecture elegance, built entirely on the bodies of dead Christians and their confiscated lands and money. The ‘modern’ world’s remarkably ignorant view would have made little impression on those who lived in Spain from 710 to 1492 under the Muslim yoke, or prey to its Jihad and rapine. Visigothic Spain in the 7th century was one of the wealthiest areas on the planet. Muslims squatted, ate, drained and used that vast wealth, which by the 11th century ensured that Spain was falling into economic and social decline wherever the Muslims dominated. Muslim-dominated Spain was essentially a slave empire with ‘Dhimmitude’ or knave status for White Christians a norm, subject to sur-taxation, the enslavement of girls for the harem, or the abduction of young boys to serve in the Jihad.
Spain was just a steppingstone into the heart of Europe. The publicly declared intention of the Muslim Jihad was to extinguish Christianity in Europe and establish a moon-cult Caliphate. In 719, the Muslim governor of Spain al Khawlani, invaded southern France and took Narbonne sitting near the Mediterranean. He used it as a base to raid the areas of Provence and the Pyrenes, acquiring slaves, booty and spilling the blood of the local Franks. Late in 719 the Muslims attempted to take Toulouse, but were defeated in a significant encounter, which bought the Franks time and about a decade to build a reply to the Muslim Jihad. The Christian victory over the Muslim Arabs at Constantinople in 718, was matched in importance by the Christian victory at Toulouse, under Eudes or Odo the Great, the Duke of Acquitaine, and his Christian knights.
After this battle Aquitaine declared independence from the Frankish empire. Eudes made an alliance with a Muslim-Berber chieftain sited in the Pyrenes in order to protect his independence from Charles Martel and the Franks. Muslims are forbidden to make alliances with the Infidel. In 731, the new Muslim Arab governor, one Abdul Rahman, invaded the Berber’s lands. Rahman pointed his vast army to the land of the Franks. Eudes attempted a stand at Bordeaux, was defeated, and the city put to the sword, with its population raped, its women sent to harems in Damascus and its men enslaved. Eudes attempted another defence at the Garonne river, only to see his men slaughtered. He fled to Paris, to Charles Martel and his Franks, a man and empire he had recently seceded from.
After eviscerating the forces of Eudes, the Muslims under Rahman do what Muslims do best. They plundered the land of its riches. Gibbon refers to the ‘rich soil’ of the Churches and monasteries, their wealth and objects being stolen or set to fire. Some Bishops were burnt alive as a warning to others. By early 732 the Muslims controlled all the major towns and ports between the Pyrenes and the Rhone river. Rahman had a force of 80.000 men, and he divided them into 2 armies with the objective of taking Tours, the wealthiest Basilica in Western Christendom, containing illimitable riches. Between the coast and Tours, endless numbers of towns fell, slaves taken, women raped, many sent on to the harems in the Middle East, men made eunuchs or slaves, and gold and silver taken. For the big brains in the ‘modern’ world, 80.000 Muslim men destroying an entire region of Francia is ‘just a raid’, of no great import, and those happy, laughing endearing Muslims had no intention of ‘staying’ or controlling these Christian areas – which begs the question of what they were doing in Spain.
Exactly 100 years after the death of the mad brigand and false prophet Muhammad, an enormous Muslim force, laden with booty and slaves, was in the vicinity of St Martin Of Tours and one of the most important pilgrimage sites in Western Christianity. The Muslim force was largely composed of Berbers, non-White North Africans, who fought as light calvary. Moors or Arab Muslims fought mostly on horseback with scimitars and lances, trained to attack, and largely ignorant of defensive manoeuvrers. The Franks under their leader or Mayor of the Palace, Charles Martel, were largely a heavy infantry force. A typical infantry man under Martel would bear 70 pounds of iron. The Franks would be organised into deep phalanx formations, using shields, spears and bearing swords, axes, including the famous throwing axe the francisca and daggers.
Near Tours Martel chose the high ground flanked by dense woods, both for protection and to hide the numbers of his much smaller force. So burdened with booty that he was forced to start shipping much of it south, Rahman, with the autumn winter chills in the air, decided to attack on October 10 732. The Muslims frenetic charges were direct and head on. They were largely ineffective against the massed ranks of the heavy Frankish infantry situated on a hillside flanked by forests. The Franks would have had a wall of locked shields, punctuated by long spears which would seek out the underbellies of horses or the body of a lightly armoured Muslim rider. Charles the Frankish leader found himself surrounded but enacted such a great slaughter at the besieging Muslims, gaining his freedom, that he was nicknamed the Hammer. As night fell the Franks regrouped expecting another great clash on the morrow.
But during the night the Muslim hordes had fled. Their leader Rahman had been killed. No one knows how many Muslims died but probably no fewer than 20.000 against relatively few Frankish dead. The Berbers always wary of Arab Muslims and their duplicity, and usually treated by the same as badly as Infidels were treated, had decided that some booty and life were preferable over fighting Frankish heavy infantry. The Franks did not chase the Muslims, knowing that their victory was due to the heavy shield wall and ranks of armour. The Muslims devastated the land as they headed south, taking more slaves and plunder and setting villages, town and churches alight.
Martel had to fight more large battles to evict the Muslims from Francia. The most significant occurred in 737 near Narbonne where he destroyed the Muslim occupying forces, and in 739 not far away from Narbonne, where the last vestiges of Muslim overlordship were extinguished and the Jihadis were driven back across the Pyrenes. Indeed, until his death in 741 AD Martel was on a yearly campaign to denude Francia of the Muslim pestilence.
The carnage enacted by the Muslims on Francia, in just a decade is hard to calculate. Tens of thousands would have been killed, far more taken as slaves, with many women feeding the insatiable appetites of Muslim harems across North Africa and the Middle East. Untold scores of towns and villages were plundered and destroyed. Hundreds of churches and monastic buildings set to fire or pulled down, their riches stolen or melted down. The land foraged and ‘scorched’ to supply food and material for 80.000 or so Jihadis. The destruction would last generations and as with every other area subjected to the Muslim Jihad, social, economic and cultural degradation was immense. Yet for the ‘modern world’, these brave, resolute Christians, using advanced technology and armour, though outnumbered and often surprised by the alacrity of the Muslim light calvary, who were now in the 730s starting to fight back against the Jihad and in effect saving civilisation, are casually dismissed as ‘dark agers’, ‘superstitious people’ and ‘backwards’. The exact opposite descriptions in reality apply to these Christians. They mounted a considerable and ferocious defence of civilisation against the hordes and Orcs of Muhammad.
The Roman empire at the time of Christ had about 100 million people within its borders. It is estimated that 40% of the population of Rome which housed some 1.5 million people were slaves. That is roughly 600.000 White slaves just in the capital. Hence the bread and circuses to keep them fed and diverted. Across the Roman empire the usual estimates are that 10-20% were slave chattel, or some 10-20 million Whites. This is likely an understatement. The Roman empire was a slave empire, everything was built and managed by cheap slave labour. All industry, agriculture, warring and daily life depended on slaves. Quite likely 30-40% within the Roman empire were slaves.
The need for slaves meant that the empire must expand, necessitating endless wars, to find more slaves. A citizen of Rome could not normally be enslaved. The Romans needed non-Romans, Slavs from south-eastern Europe, Goths and Teutons from the north, Celts and Britons from the north-west. Very little trafficking in Black slaves occurred during Roman times, there was no need for it. Supplies of White slaves were plentiful and easily obtained. It was a ‘civilisation’ built on White slavery. This is apparently, for the ‘intellectual’, the high point of ‘classical civilisation’ and the apogee of ‘development’. An empire which existed on White slavery is applauded with happy nods, grins, and raised eyebrows, as the great example of man’s civilising mission.
None of this is taught today in ‘education’, but the barbarity of the Roman empire was a well-known fact in the Middle Ages, before the ‘Enlightenment’ endarkened reality and substituted Christianophobia with a biased anti-Christian theology into historical, sociological, and cultural discourse. Various Christian Medieval Kings, including Charlemagne, ridiculed the coarseness of Rome and Athens, their lack of progress in many areas, the unlimited enslavement, depravity and secular barbarity reflected in societies that operated without the Christian ideals of chivalry, equality, humility, forgiveness and charity. The ancient world for most was nasty, brutish and short.
Rome enslaved tens of millions of Whites. But do congratulate its greatness.
What about Arabs, Muslims, Black Muslims, Turkish Muslims, Mongol Muslims and White slavery? Didn’t the Muslims hug, kiss and tenderly develop the ‘dark age’ ‘ignorant’ Christians, teaching them Aristotle, showing them how to bathe, endeavouring them to read and write, patiently showing them farming and fishing? So, we are told. In reality, the far more advanced civilised, learned, technologically sophisticated and industrialised ‘dark age Europeans’ were raped and slaughtered en-masse over 1200 years by Muslims. Tens of millions of White Christians were taken by these Koran-inspired Jihadists over 1200 years from every geographical angle and direction. White Slavery only ended along the Barbary-Muslim coast in 1816 for example, with 1.5 million Whites enslaved over 250 years. Surely there is an academic and ‘expert’ somewhere who will define this enslavement as liberating, educating and justified.
It is curious that Arabs, Turks, Black Muslims, Mongols and Muslim Berbers don’t need to bend knees to White Christians. The Muslim empires, like the Roman were slave empires. In the Muhammadan cult, a Muslim cannot enslave another Muslim. This is why the Koran goes to great lengths adjuring the taking ‘with the right hand’ of Christians. White slaves were needed to run the Muslim empire, fill the galleys and armies, dig out the mines, build the ships and cities, develop the land and agriculture, serve as sex-chattel for the illimitable lusts of Muslim lords, governors, caliphs and Sultans. The Muslim empires imitated the Roman. They were primitive and built on human flesh.
The carnage in lost White lives, broken families, destroyed societies, the individual agony of being enslaved, the pain, the torture, the galley slave rowing in his own faeces and urine year after year, the massive harems stocked with white women, the white Christian boys having their penises removed to make them eunuchs to guard harems and sultans…..none of this is even discussed.
-In North Africa alone, from 640 to 1816, Arab, Black, Berber Muslims enslaved well over 5 million Whites both from within North African domains (Roman, Greek, Christian slaves) and from Europe (invasions, corsairs, raids who were brought back to North Africa to be used or sold as slaves).
-Arab and Black Muslims enslaved over 1 million White Christians just in Spain. Most people don’t know that waves of Black Muslims were pre-dominant in the Muslim Jihad in Spain.
-Arab and Black Muslims linked up with the Vikings to promote White slave trading all over Gaul and Britain, with hundreds of thousands of Whites enslaved during the Viking invasions sold to Muslims in Spain, North Africa and the Levant. Probably another 1 million Whites were sent by Vikings south to Muslims over 200 years. One of the great drivers of the Viking invasions was white slavery. Dublin, Limerick and Waterford in Ireland were established as slave trading centres. During the Roman era Bristol was already known as a white-slave trading port. White slavery was endemic in Roman, Saxon and Viking Britain.
-Ottoman Muslims enslaved some 2.5 million Christian boys (the Janissaries) over 250 years JUST from the Balkans (7-10.000 / yr average x 250 years). One cannot understand the Balkans without comprehending the slaughter and devastation enacted by the Muslim Ottomans over 400 years; including the ‘devshirme’ or the collection of young Christian boys, many of them to be castrated, all of them converted to Muhammadanism, with a majority trained and brainwashed to become the elite warriors of the Sultan or Janissaries. Yet there is nary a whimper about this today from the ‘intellectuals’ in the ‘West’.
-Ottoman Muslims enslaved some 5 million Hungarians and millions more in Austria, Serbia, Albania, Romania, Wallachia, over 400 years. In Hungary alone some 5 million may have been taken. Given that the Muslim Turks enacted yearly raids or razzia, to find Christian slaves, and could easily attack villages and cities with their endless hordes and enslave 20.000 to 40.000 from just one razzia, it stands to reason that 5-10 million White slaves over 250 years would easily be taken from Central Europe (250 years x 10.000 = 2.5 million, so 5 million would be a very low estimate).
-Muslims enslaved some 2-5 million Russians from modern day Russia and Ukraine (Mongols, Turks). The wars and raids from the south and east into Russia and eastern Europe were almost yearly after 1200, with both Moscow and Kiev destroyed in the 1240s. There was the endless Muslim search for rape and booty, much of it targeting the beautiful White women usually depicted as prostitutes in Muslim propaganda.
One can read about the Ottoman slaughter in just one area say Albania, to get a sense of the scale of White enslavement by Muslims. Small Albania which fronts Italy on the Adriatic was planned to be the launching pad for an invasion of Italy and an attack on Rome. In the 15th century the great Christian warrior Skanderberg, once a Muslim slave and forced lover of the Sultan took control of Albania and led a Christian revolt. Skanderberg had been handed over to the Ottomans by his Father, an Albanian Lord who tried to ransom peace with the Muslims to protect his lands. This agreement was never honoured by the Muslims of course and Skanderberg as a ransomed prisoner was raped by the Sultan as a boy, forcibly converted to Islam, and became a renowned warrior and Ottoman general.
Skanderberg became one of Europe’s greatest and probably, least known, heroes. In the 15th century, for over 25 years and victorious in at least 30 battles, outnumbered in every one, sometimes by 20:1, Skanderberg defeated the huge Muslim armies which pressed into Albania and arrested the expansion of their empire. He bought Europe about 70 years which proved to be the difference between most of the Continent remaining Christian or being Muslimified. It is very hard to estimate the extent of slavery just from little Albania, but in reading the wars of Skanderberg, probably in 30 years at least 500.000 White Christians were enslaved, and the land was rendered so desolate and de-populated that it has NEVER recovered. In the Middle Ages, Albania was wealthy, White and Christian. After 1500 it became Muslim and poor. Just imagine one small area of southern Europe, offering up 500.000 White slaves. The extent of White slavery to feed the various Muslim empires from 640 A.D. to 1816 A.D. is almost unfathomable.
But in today’s upside-down, clown-world, where history is rewritten and lies and stupidity are now truth and intelligence, Muslim Arabs, Berbers, Turks and Mongols don’t need to bend knees to White Christians. Such ignorance is how civilisations die.
Black Lives Don’t Matter if you are a Black Christian in Africa. Black Lives Don’t Matter if you are a Black slave of Muslim and Black owners in central and East Africa, some 5-10 million who are slave chattel. Nary a word from the ‘experts’, ‘the science’, ‘those who know’ about the eradication of Christianity in Africa, or the on-going enslavement of Christians and non-Muslims in vast areas of Africa. Only cries about the non-existent Climate-plant food-catastrophe, or mental illness dysphoria over gender, or Corona fascism over a death rate of 0.3% or less. Black Christian Lives Don’t Matter.
The Muslim Jihad in Africa started in the 640s with the eradication of Romano-Christian and Berber civilisations in North Africa. By the 8th century Sahara and sub-Sahara were under Jihadic attack. The great invasions of Spain during the 7th, 10th, and 11th centuries were fuelled in part by Black Muslims. Millions of White Christians in Spain were killed, enslaved or forced to convert to the cult of Muhammad to survive. Endless thousands of Christian churches and buildings destroyed or converted to Muslim use. No need for Black or Arab Muslims today, to bend knees White Spanish Christians.
Muslims and the persecution of Christians in Africa are intrinsically linked. Weakened governments on the African continent are worn down by years of fighting a losing battle against jihadists and are enfeebled by their own corruption and conspicuous consumption. The unnecessary and destructive global shutdown over Covid-19 has served to weaken them further, and embolden Islamic extremists, who have accelerated their plans to establish a Caliphate.
The Islamic State (IS) in Africa is rapidly expanding. IS West African Province (ISWAP) has stepped up its activities in the Sahel, pledging allegiance to the new IS Caliph, Abu al-Husayn al-Husayni al-Qurashi.
Nigeria is being ravaged by the three-pronged menace of ISWAP and their rivals, Boko Haram and Fulani militants. ISWAP and Boko Haram especially want to eliminate Christians as part of their jihadist crusade, in an ongoing ethnic cleansing which could soon rival the 1994 Rwandan genocide if left unabated.
On the Nigerian side of Lake Chad, ISWAP and Boko Haram have been fighting each other for dominance since 2016. The war is displacing millions, spilling over into the rest of the Sahel and killing thousands. Fishermen on Lake Chad pay a ‘levy’ to ISWAP militants, a trophy prize which Boko Haram ruthlessly aim for regardless of how many they murder or maim in this pursuit. Their rivalry is ripping apart the Sahel, and innocents are suffering.
Since Islamists began their terror campaign in Nigeria 14 years ago, over two million people have been displaced and 40,000 killed. Christians there make up half the population of just over 200 million.
In August, ISWAP militants murdered 40 Christians including children in south-west Nigeria, and injured dozens. The attack took place during a church service for Pentecost. Assaulting and murdering Christians in their houses of prayer is a favoured tactic by Islamist militants in Africa. Two months later Fulani militants killed more than 70 Christians in central Nigeria.
Islamists in Nigeria frequently stage jail breaks to free high-profile jihadists, with 4,300 inmates escaping since 2017. Ansaru, a new al-Qaeda affiliate in the Sahel, is responsible for spreading jihadist propaganda and further bloodshed in the country.
Ansaru also has a presence in Libya, a failed state where Islamist factions compete for dominance, targeting Muslim apostates and enslaving Christian migrants seeking passage to Europe. The latter serves as a fundraising exercise for Muslim extremists such as al-Qaeda, a point that cheerleaders for uncontrolled immigration would do well to remember.
Another country in the Sahel, Mali, is being ripped apart by IS who target Christian men and boys, murdering them because of their faith. IS has taken advantage of the devastation there caused by the government’s implementation of Covid-19 lockdowns.
Five million Christians in Burkina Faso are being subjected to growing persecution by Islamist factions, with jihadists emboldened by yet another country devastated by Covid-19 anti-science policies. Since 2015, IS and al-Qaeda have killed around 1.5million people in this small African state. While Westerners cheered lockdown and grew fat on their takeaways and furlough money, the thousands who fled Islamist persecution in Burkina Faso for a precarious existence in refugee camps were impoverished. Ignored by a world obsessed with ‘safety’, jihadists accelerated their attacks on churchgoers.
Outside the Sahel, Islamists have been encouraged by the disastrous US withdrawal from Afghanistan. Al-Qaeda instructed its branch in Somalia, al-Shabaab, to dedicate itself to overthrowing the Somalian government and the expulsion of foreign forces. Car bombs and suicide bombings are their weapons of choice, innocent civilians are their targeted collateral damage.
Al-Shabaab’s status in al-Qaeda is rising; its tentacles are spreading to Kenya and Ethiopia too. In October, dozens were killed or wounded in al-Shabaab’s suicide bombing in Somalia, one of at least 41 such attacks since 2022. Al-Shabaab has killed thousands of civilians, including children, and Britons living in Mogadishu. It too marks Christians for persecution and death.
Further south, IS continues to advance. Its activities in South Africa, where they have established training camps and cells, are strengthened by the corruption and inefficiency rife in the country’s security forces.
ISWAP is also progressing in Mozambique, seeking to establish an Islamic Caliphate by ethnically cleansing 18million Christians living there. Their favoured tactics are burning churches and religious schools, beheading innocents and kidnapping girls. While Westerners spent much of 2022 hiding from a flu virus, jihadists went on a killing spree of Christians in Mozambique, attacking more than 100 churches, murdering 300 innocents and displacing 80,000 people.
Islamist jihadism and Christians are intrinsically linked, the latter the most persecuted people in the world. While the West eats itself over Covid-19, ‘racism’ and ‘climate change’, it ignores what is effectively the violent establishment of a Caliphate in whole swathes of Africa. Real racism is occurring there, with this oppression of non-white Christians in danger of turning into a genocide. If Westerners could protest against this instead of focusing on self-indulgent navel gazing, Christians in Africa might stand a chance of survival against the Islamist onslaught.
By 709 A.D. Musa bin Nasyr the Ummayid governor, had conquered all of North Africa. Christian and Berber civilisation was effaced. The Berbers en-masse converted to the Meccan cult and under their chieftain ‘Tarek’ of Tangiers, would lead the invasion of Christian Spain which was one of the richest areas in the Mediterranean basin a fact confirmed by the amazed Muslim chroniclers as they conquered the peninsula. The Christian Visigoths viewed the Muslimified Berbers for what they were – uneducated, uncivilised, quite pagan in their practices, brutal, deceitful, vicious.
Raids against Spain proceeded during 709 and 710. By 711, Tarek had assembled enough information on the riches and allures of Spain, both human and inanimate, and had trained and provisioned at least 12.000 mostly Berber (non-White) Muslims for the invasion. The fleet put in at Gibraltar or ‘Tarek’s hill’ and the boats were burnt, the villagers raped and killed and some eaten. Survivors were sent to the mainland to terrify the Christian population with stories of Muslim savagery.
Visigothic King Roderick was based in Toledo and was soon warned of the invasion. Rousing his nobles and army, he proceeded south and met the Muslims near the Guadalete river. The Muslims were energised and emboldened by Tarek’s tale of endless physical pleasures with beautiful Christian sex slaves should the Muslim’s win victory, along with rich plunder. If killed in battle the Muslim ghazi Jihadi would enjoy the sexual delights of the nubile houris or big breasted virgins and young boys. It was always a win-win for the Jihadis.
Tarek directly attacked King Roderick, whose men nearby scattered, indicating treason or abject cowardice. He was slain and the battle was a rout. Most of the Christian army was slaughtered, units retreated back to their districts and the standard bearer of Roderick one Don Pelagius or Pelayo, retreated with a handful of men to the north of Spain to carry on the fight. Post Gaudalete the Muslims began to penetrate deep in Spain, with terror, rape and slaughter in the vanguard. A second large battle with the remnants of the original Christian army under Roderick was fought at Ecija ending in another Muslim victory. Resistance began to collapse across the peninsula. The Muslims in Africa when fed news of these victories, began to cross the strait and join the Jihad in their many thousands. Christians continued to fight, using castles and fortresses to great effect to try and slow the Jihad. Muslim sources detail the valour and resolution of the Christian defence. In Cordoba the leading Christian Visigoths were forced to retreat into a Cathedral. The Muslims promised them safe passage if they surrendered. Knowing this was a lie they instead fought on and all were burnt to death as the Muslims set the Cathedral on fire.
The catastrophic destruction and takeover of Spain in just a few years is difficult to understand given the wealth and power of the Christian kingdom. Terror and trickery were certainly important in the Muslim conquest. The speed of the Muslim armies, lightly armed, with light calvary probably took the Christian military leaders, whose men and calvary were more heavily armed and who relied on overwhelming power at the point of impact, by surprise. Jews also aided the Muslim invasion often opening up city gates to the Muslim forces, and providing troops to garrison towns taken by the Jihad.
From 711 to 717 the Muslims conquered Christian Spain, a peninsula with over 5 million inhabitants. The dead, wounded and forcibly converted are almost impossible to calculate, but in the region of some 500.000 were killed or murdered, some 1 million enslaved and the rest broken under the Dhimmi-Jizya system of subjugation, with a large minority converting over time to the cult of Muhammad, categorised as Mooriscoes to those who were once Christian but were now for various reasons, part of the Muhammadan cult.
By 717 A.D. Christendom was nearly destroyed. The ‘West’ was a rump of a once singular cultural empire, with Christian states in the Pyrenes and north remaining free of the Muslim Jihad and domination. Syria, Egypt and North Africa, once prosperous Christian lands were now lying in waste and ruin, ruled over by various Muslim emirs, with millions enslaved, hundreds of thousands killed in battle, and millions more being forced to convert to Muhammad’s cult. Tens of thousands of Churches were pulled down, libraries including Alexandria which was the largest ever in the ancient world torched and industry and agriculture spoilt and decimated. The real prize of the Jihad, Constantinople, the Christian capital of the Byzantine empire and the wealthiest city in the world, eluded the Muslim Jihad.
Muslim sources defined the Roman-Christian empire and its capital as ‘slaves of the cross’, and its emperor a ‘Roman dog’. Muhammad in divinely sanctioning Jihad targeted Christianity and especially Constantinople as its primary objective (see 9:29, with Sura 9 being a chapter devoted to war and terrorism against Christianity). Abu Sufyan (b. 602), who was a general at the Muslim victory at Yarmuk in 637 A.D was desirous of conquering the Roman dogs. Sacking and plundering Georgia and Armenia, taking tens of thousands of slaves and slaughtering at least 50.000 in battle, Sufyan began the long process of raiding and controlling Constantinople’s hinterland upon which it depended for men, food and industry. The first siege of Constantinople lasted from 674-678 but was defeated. Theophanes a contemporary Christian historian wrote that ‘the deniers of Christ’ numbered over 100.000 Ghazi or warriors but were destroyed, with their fleets burnt and scattered by the use of ‘Greek fire’ an early napalm, which issued from the Byzantine biremes or rowed-galley warships. The Christian victory over the Muslim hordes in 678 AD at Constantinople quite likely saved Western civilisation and Europe. Few know of it today.
One of the allures of for the Muslim Jihad were the ‘beautiful’ White women of the Christian Roman empire, always depicted in Arab and Muslim literature as lascivious, wanton, prone to prostitution. Abut al-Jahiz (b 776), a Muslim chronicler at the court in Damascus, wrote that the White Christian Byzantine woman was the ‘most shameless in the world’. They were adulterous, prone to sexual escapades and not much better than a prostitute. Muslim sources routinely declare that White women enjoyed being sex slaves and the sexual toys of men. Even nuns were depicted as whores offering themselves clandestinely to monks. In today’s ‘modern’ world the allure of sex slavery for the Muslim Jihad is almost completely ignored even though in the Ukraine modern Muslim Jihadi’s were inspired to fight against NATO citing the beautiful and fetching women of the Ukraine as potential prizes. Millions of White women, just from Eastern Christendom, the Balkans, central Europe, Ukraine and Russia have been sold into sex chattel slavery over 1400 years. The Viking onslaught from the 8th to 11th centuries was in large part to furnish Moslem caliphates and empires with White sex slaves. Dublin was established as a sex-trading centre to feed the insatiable Muslim demand for White slaves. Many entrepots in the East along the major rivers of Russia and the Ukraine provided the same. No one in the ‘modern West’ believes that knee-bending for the millions of White men and women sold as sex chattel is necessary.
The evisceration of the Muslim Jihad at the walls of Constantinople in 678 A.D. allowed the Byzantines to reconquer former Christian territory. The Jihad however resumed in 705 A.D. under Caliph Al-Walid ‘the great hater of Christians’, who started the new effort by demolishing the great Basilica dedicated to John the Baptist in Damascus, a city now long controlled by the Muslims. Walid raided and razed Anatolia and its cities and towns. He invaded Armenia and hauled off endless booty and White slaves back to Damascus sending thousands in slavery to Arabia. He began to fell entire cedar forests in Lebanon to rebuild the Muslim navy for an assault on Constantinople. By 715 A.D. Walid had assembled 200.000 Muslim Jihadis to attack the Christian capital, some 120.000 by land, and 80.000 by sea. However, he died in 715 A.D. and was succeeded by Suleiman who had the same ambition of annihilating the great Christian capital. Suleiman instructed his Muslim emirs in places like Egypt to ‘milk’ the Christian ‘camels’, to finance his vast forces being assembled and trained to slaughter and end the Christian Byzantine empire. In many places hot irons were seared into the heads of Christians who had to pay not only the Jizya tax to allow their very survival and existence, but also the surfeit of other taxes to the Muslim Jihad. If a Christian was discovered without this ‘sign’ he would have his arms severed, and after was beheaded.
Suleiman’s brother Muslama was tasked with taking Constantinople. He attacked across Anatolia with his 120.000 man army, with ‘both sword and fire, he put an end to Asia Minor’, according to Muslim sources. By the summer of 717 A.D. leaving a trail of absolute devastation, dead bodies, burning cities and towns behind, the Muslim Jihad under Maslama reached the walls of Constantinople. Catapults, battering rams and the siege engines of war were deployed along the walls of the city, hauled to their stations over hundreds of miles by an endless train of mules and camels. Unable to make an impression on the walls, the Muslim army awaited the great navy, carrying some 80.000 more men, which arrived around September 1. The Christians surprising the Muslims, immediately sent out their Navy from behind the heavy chain which guarded the Dardanelles against the Muslim Jihadi fleet. Within a short period of time, most of the Muslim navy was afire, or sinking. The Christian ships withdrew behind the chain after this surprising victory.
The Muslim army however was still entrenched around the city and showed no interest in leaving. The siege continued throughout a cold and cruel winter. Disease, frost and famine started to decimate the Muslim army. By the spring it was in disarray, greatly reduced in numbers, with extraordinarily low morale. The Muslims were reduced to eating camels, horses and mules and plague roared through their camps. In the early spring of 718 a massive 800 ship fleet arrived from Alexandria in support of the Muslim siege. Most of the slaves rowing these galleys were conscripted and enslaved Coptic Christians. Remarkably, they rebelled, left the fleet and found refuge in the city. This deprived the Muslim fleet of its manpower and mobility. Again, the Christian navy attacked and as before the Muslim fleet was completely routed with most of its ships set on fire or sunk.
The Christian navy this time pursued the fleeing Muslim fleet and destroyed most of what remained. Paid with Byzantine gold, the non-Christian Bulgars, in their empire to the north of the Byzantines, attacked the weakened and sick Muslim army, killing more than 20.000 Jihadis. The new Caliph Omar II ordered the Muslim army back to Damascus on August 15 718 A.D. A massive summer storm destroyed what remained of the Muslim fleet and out of the 200.000 ghazis who attacked Constantinople in 717 A.D., maybe 30.000 straggled back to Damascus by land. Leo, the Byzantine empire, his army and fleet saved western civilisation according to historian A. Vasilev, ‘By his successful resistance Leo saved not only the Byzantine Empire and the eastern Christian world, but also all of western civilisation’. Vasilev is right.
North Africa in the 7th century, was like Egypt, a rich and fertile land. Corn, wheat, vegetables, fruit, wine, flax, honey and other commodities were produced. Mining, metallurgy, industry, linens, ceramics moved were deposited for exchange in large and established ports which proliferated along the Mediterranean coast, plied and supported by large merchant navies. It was an advanced Christian civilisation, under the control and some would say the ‘yoke’ of the Byzantines. Heavy taxes, civil wars, and the usual Roman preoccupation with corruption and intrigue marred and scarred the civil society. In general, however, there is no doubt that Christian North Africa, once the granary and resource entrepot for the Roman empire along with Egypt, was a very civilised and rich area.
North Africa’s decline, still evident today, can be directly linked to the Muslim invasions and forced Muslim conversions of the North African Romano-Christian-Berber populations. North Africa’s poverty is a direct result of this devastation. The eradication of the foundations of agriculture, industry, learning and administration were so complete, that by the end of the 12th century, it was clear that North Africa was not only going to be eclipsed by a more dominant, advanced Christian Europe, but would be completely controlled by the Christian states to the north, who were by the 12th century far ahead of North Africa in every aspect of socio-economic-cultural and religious life.
During the course of the 7th century the Muslim invasions decimated one of the richest regions on the planet. The great expansion from Egypt ‘west’ to the Atlantic was deemed ‘destiny’ for the Muslim Jihad. It began in earnest in 666 a Muslim general bin Nafi, set out with a force of 10.000 men, entered southern Tunisia and slaughtered thousands of Christians, pulled down their churches, and established Muslim rule in the hinterland of what had been the ancient Carthaginian empire. Muslim sources delighted in recounting entire cities being enslaved by Nafi, and the endless destruction of Christian churches en route. The carnage was so awful, the pile of dead and the chains of the enslaved so deep and long, that many Berber chieftains without knowing anything about Muhammad’s cult, said the Shahada and converted. Tribes from Tunisia down to the Sudan which means ‘Black Lands’ in Arabic, were thus coerced into joining the Jihad. The Muslim chroniclers at the time thought the Berbers were largely worthless and treacherous, with their conversions being no more than aesthetic covering, more for personal survival than out of any solid convictions. Endless revolts and rebellions over 30 years would prove this assessment to be correct.
Nafi’s reign of Jihad terror took his armies across North Africa, into Morocco and to the Atlantic. Countless Berbers and natives were forcibly converted, at least ostensibly to the Arab-Muslim cult. In 683 Nafi was killed in battle. He is still venerated by Muslims as one of the great Jihadi’s on a par with Khalid ‘The Sword of Allah’ who conquered Syria. Like Khalid Nafi enjoyed limitless sex slaves, traded in both male and female slaves and had little trouble in killing and murdering Christian or Berber innocents in order to spread his terror and force acquiescence from the general population.
Nafi’s example of Jihad, rape and slavery was enthusiastically taken up by his successors. An example is the Yemenite born governor of Africa, a Nusayr, who in 698, began to wage battles of genocide to completely eradicate Christian-Romano and Berber tribes who resisted the Muslim occupation. A Muslim historian al-Maqqari (1578-1632) documented the Jihad in North Africa, wrote that the Christian and Berbers would regularly revolt and renounce their conversion to Muhammad’s cult. Starting in 698, Nusayr embarked on a bloody and genocidal series of campaigns in which according to Maqqari, hundreds of thousands were killed, and hundreds of thousands more enslaved, perhaps even more than half a million were captured as used as slave-sex chattel. In total there is no reason to doubt that a million Christian and Berber men, women and children, within 15 years, were either taken as slaves or killed by Muslims in North Africa. It was truly a campaign that the modern human-rights activist would catalogue as a genocide.
An energetic Berber Queen named Kahina persisted against the Muslim Jihad but was defeated and beheaded. That seemed to end the resistance of the Christian and Berber tribes. In 698 Carthage finally fell amid great slaughter and captivity. Nusayr destroyed and razed the entire city – the ruins of which are still visible today. According to al-Maqqari, when the tribes of the ‘dreary plains’ of Africa saw the fate of Kahina and her tribe (many of whom were slaughtered or enslaved of course), they consented to conversion. Nusayr took many of the men from the African tribes and in Arabic, taught them the details and benefits of Jihad – beneficial that is if you are on the winning side. By 709 North Africa was under Muslim control.
Ironically it would be the non-white Berbers, former slaves of the Muhammadan cult who would provide the core and nexus of the great Muslim invasion of Spain in 710 A.D. and again in the 11th century; and who would become the enslavers of non-Muslims and Christians in Spain and beyond.
In December 639 after conquering Syria, the Levant and Israel, Egypt was next for the Muslim Jihad. The Christianised lands of North Africa, chafed under the sway of the rather Orientalist Christian Byzantine empire. Heavy taxation, corruption, intrigues, a long list of civil wars, the Byzantine empire, in many ways mimicked its Western counterpart of the 4th and 5th centuries. Egypt was home to some of Christendom’s most important Church leaders including Clement of Alexandria (b 150 AD); Origen the Great (b 184), Anthony the Great (b 251 and the father of monasticism), and Athanasius (b 297) the main proponent and defender of the Nicene creed. The Christian library in Alexandria was the largest the ancient world ever saw – tens of thousands of volumes – which would go up in smoke and down in ruins in the early 640s thanks to the Muslim Jihad, and the Muslim demand that all non-Koranic books be laid to waste.
The Muslims invaded Egypt in late 639, slaughtering all before them, capturing slaves and taking towns and cities. The Byzantine defence was incredibly weak. By 641 the Jihad reached Alexandria and the city was well defended and walled. Heraclius the Byzantine emperor resolved to support and supply the city with men and food. The Muslim siege lasted 6 months but Heraclius and the relief army never came with Heraclius dying in February 641. A Roman-Byzantine traitor effected the handover of the city in September 641. A bloodbath followed the Muslim entry. Churches were burnt down, women raped, slaves enchained, and mass murder committed. The Muslims also burnt down the library of Alexandria. But don’t expect a movie or book about the same – unless Christians are somehow blamed for this event. The volumes lost, the learning, the pagan-ancient texts committed to fire, the extirpation of manuals and knowledge, the vast quantities of erudition sent to ash – the exactitude of the destruction will never be known but it was great enough to keep, according to Muslim sources, the bath houses of Alexandria lit continuously for Muslim usage for 6 months. But it is an event that almost no one in the neutered ‘West’ today, even knows about. This act was repeated by Muslims from Syria to France. Nary a word from the ‘experts’ except to blame the lack of libraries and book learning and ancient textual knowledge on a ‘dark age’ in Christendom.
Christian ‘Copts’ were so named by the Arab Muslims who called the Egyptians, ‘gypt’, from whence the English translation of Copt is derived. Coptic chroniclers, supported by Muslim writers, witnessed the endless pillage and destruction of Egypt. What was once a rich land, rich in agriculture and manufacturing, became under Muslim domination, poor and shattered. Virgin Nuns were routinely targeted for rape and monks were an especial delight for Muslims to torture and main. Whoever surrendered was summarily slaughtered by the Muslims. John of Nikiu 650 AD an eyewitness laments the endless death, carnage and demolition of Christian churches, towns and villages in the Nile delta. The list of outrage and diabolical annihilation is so long that he gives up providing a complete list and in despair writes ‘it is impossible to describe the horrors the Muslims committed.’
Egypt never recovered from the Muslim invasions. It is still largely poor today. As with all conquered land, the Muslims ‘milked’ the territory of its wealth. They added nothing in return. Industry, agriculture, the arts and sciences were all destroyed. The Jizya or head-tax to be ‘left alone’ was a crushing burden on a land eviscerated by the Muslim Jihad. Much wealth was siphoned off to Syria by the Muslims. In order to survive and escape the endless rape and pillaging, millions of Copts said the ‘Shahada’ and converted to Muhammad’s cult. The prolonged massacring of Christians, the endless taxation and Jizya and the burning and plundering of Christian towns and villages produced the desired effect of forced conversions.
One thousand years of Greek culture and over 600 years of Christian culture came to a crashing end in Egypt with the arrival of the Muslims. The Byzantines failed to retake Alexandria in 645 and 654. Worse still the great port of Alexandria provided a fleet and base for Muslim naval operations in the Eastern Mediterranean. They invaded Cyprus and subjugated it amidst great slaughter and enslavement in the early 650s. Sicily was soon conquered after Cyprus with local sources lamenting the rape, the murder, the looting of gold and silver and the endless desecration and destruction of churches and any building bearing a cross. Thousands of Christian Sicilians like their Cypriot co-religionists were marched off into slavery. This is another untold story in the ‘modern’ world. The subjugation, slaughter and rapine of Christian lands and islands in the Mediterranean by the Muslim Jihad. No apologies by Muslims to White Christians needed. No bending of knees.
‘It is neither hunger nor poverty that has driven us from our land (Arabia). We, the Arabs, are drinkers of blood and we know there is no blood more tasty than that of the Greeks. That is why we have come to spill and to drink your blood.’ Khalid bin al-Walid, the ‘Sword of Allah’.
Imagine if any Christian had stated the above. Howls of rage and declarations of ‘dark ages’. But when a Muslim declares his obsession with drinking Christian blood, that is fine. Christophobia is not only accepted in the ‘modern world’, but positively enforced and enshrined.
Walid was the Jihadi most responsible for the subjugation of Byzantine-Christian Syria and the Levant from 634 to 637 AD. The Black flag of Jihad first appears as a standard in his hands, supposedly given to him by the Jihadist supreme leader, Muhammad. Modern day Muslims venerate Walid, a man who slaughtered, murdered, raped, and whose harem included other Muslim leader’s wives. He was famous for assassinating his rivals. His piety was often open to question and interpretation. He was a thug, a brigand, a mercenary, an immoral and vicious barbarian. A true Jihadi or Ghazi.
Byzantine Syria was a profoundly Christian area encompassing Jerusalem, Antioch and other major centres of the Christian faith. The Byzantine emperor Heraclius had spent a decade on a holy defensive war against the Persians. In 629 AD Heraclius rejected mad Muhammad’s demands to submit his kingdom to the Meccan Al Lah idol and prostate himself to Muhammad. Immediately raids started, led by Walid. At Ajnadayn in Israel the Muslims with Walid in the centre defeated a large 10.000-man Byzantine force. The Muslims turned toward Damascus defeating another Roman force south of the city in 635 AD allowing them to invest and conquer the city. Heraclius assembled an international force of Christians and mercenaries and by 636 AD was ready to take the offensive against the Muslim Jihad.
The Christian Byzantines retook Damascus in 636 and proceeded into Israel. In Muslim chronicles the Eastern Romans are often described as ‘the dogs of Christ’. The Muslim hatred of dogs and animals in general was already embedded in their attitudes and culture. Far from ‘venerating’ the ‘peoples of the book’, the Muslims hated Christians and sought their complete eradication. Muhammad’s final testament adjured the conquering of Constantinople and destruction of the Christian empire. There was no ‘brotherly love’ in the Muslim Jihad. Rape, sex slaves, plunder, money, loot and land were the mainsprings of the Muslim Jihad. As in Span and elsewhere, the allure of a far superior civilisation and its wealth and trade is what attracted the Muslim Jihad – along with beautiful ‘Greek’ women, often portrayed in Arab Muslim writings as lascivious, promiscuous prostitutes.
The Eastern-Roman intention was to eject the Muslims from their previous conquests of 634-635. The Muslims were no longer raiding as in previous years, but were now intent on conquering and settling, with designs on the complete overthrow of Eastern Rome. The two forces met along the Yarmuk river in Syria. The Armenian Christian Vahan, the hero of the Persian wars, led the multi-ethnic Christian army of some 30.000. Walid led the Muslim cavalry with the overall command placed in Abut Ubaida, who possessed a similar force in size to that of the Christians. Any armour worn by the Arabs had been stripped from dead Romans in previous battles, indicating a gross gap in industry and metallurgy between the two civilisations.
The battle lasted some 6 days in late August 636 AD. The heavy Christian infantry and cavalry had severely weakened and eviscerated large swathes of the Arab Muslim centre and left by day 5. However, a sandstorm blew on day 6, allowing the Arabs to charge the blinded Byzantines. The ‘wind of Al Lah’ blew the sand directly at the Christian army, obstructing them from being able to properly organise and fight. The heavy infantry of the Romans was useless in such conditions and the calvary retreated and left the field. The Muslim Arabs surrounded the trapped Christian infantry pushing them towards ridges and ravines which mark the Yarmuk landscape. They launched a night attack and massacred many of the remaining Byzantine heavy infantry.
The result of the Muslim victory at Yarmuk was devastating for world history and civilisation. The highly developed, civilised, and coherent Christian world of the Mediterranean was shattered. Within a few months of Yarmuk, Antioch fell amid much rapine, plunder and enslavement. By November 636 the Muslims were at Jerusalem having burned and pulled down any vestiges of Christianity on the way, including churches, monasteries and even hospitals. Any identification with Christianity marked a building for destruction. Jerusalem fell in the spring of 637 and Muslims violated the women, children and even the Holy Sepulchre, Christianity’s most revered site, which was now turned into a mosque. Tens of thousands of Christians were enslaved. The way to North Africa was wide open. North Africa was densely populated, wealthy, with high outputs of agriculture and industry, with massive libraries, a school system, sophisticated governance and trade systems. The Muslim Arabs would destroy all of this over 2 centuries, and North Africa has never recovered a fact little remarked upon by ‘modern scholars’.
Yarmuk was probably the most important battle in history. It destroyed Mediterranean unity, trade and cultural continuity which had stretched from France to Persia. Industry, raw materials, agriculture and cultural exchanges of all varieties would soon be effaced by the Muslim Jihad. Centres of agriculture, industry, book making and learning destroyed. After Yarmuk, the Muslim Arabs slaughtered and raped their way across North Africa into Spain and southern France. North Africa never recovered, and the unity of Christendom was shattered with a rump in the East around Constantinople, Thrace and Slavonia, and the ‘West’ including states north of Pyrennes and Italy. Civilisation and development was now impaired for over 1000 years as the Muslim Jihad sought to achieve, at the behest of different Muslim empires and entities, the complete eradication of Christianity.
“I have been commanded to wage war against mankind until they testify there is no god by Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah….If they do so, their blood and property are protected.”
“I have been made victorious with terror.”
The Muslim Jihad against civilisation and the world at large begins with Muhammad the founder of the Meccan cult. In 610 Anno Domini this deranged and bloody personality began informing his illiterate Bedouin tribesmen that the arch-angel Gabriel had selected him to be this Allah’s messenger. Historically the Al-lah or Lord of Mecca was Baal the moon deity and Muhammad’s family were its caretakers. Over time this Al Lah becomes conflated with an immanent ‘God’ and seeks to replace the Christian ideal of the Holy Trinity. Muhammad’s message was simple, the cult was called ‘Submission’ or Islam. Submit to his Al Lah whatever it might be, and most importantly to its only messenger Muhammad himself.
Forced out of Mecca, fleeing to Medina, Muhammad becomes the dictator of the city-state, forms an army and begins raiding everywhere. His followers increased as brigandage, and larceny brought back plunder and women. To join the cult, all one had to do was recite the Shahada, the first pillar of Islam, literally a sentence fragment, ‘There is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger’, which confirms loyalty to the Allah thing and Muhammad. You didn’t need to believe, do much in the way of rituals or oblations, except pray a few times and often in the early years of Muhammad’s cult that was not required.
As Edward Gibbon catalogued, from 622 to 632 AD, Muhammad led or supported an average of 9 raiding expeditions every year. By 632 AD the entire peninsula of Arabia was in the control of his cult. By comparison he had a few dozen mostly familial followers after 12 years of ‘preaching’ in Mecca. War apparently, pays big dividends. Gibbon, ‘(Muhammad) employed even the vices of mankind as the instruments of their salvation, and the use of fraud and perfidy, of cruelty and injustice, were often subservient to the propagation of the faith.’
By 630 AD Muhammad could assemble 10.000 men and march on Mecca. Abu Sufyan, the leader of the Meccans, and once an inveterate opponent of Muhammad, submitted to the Al Lah cult and said the Shahada. He would later become a fanatical Jihadist and murderer of Christians and pagans. The allure of booty, loot, women and power was built into the Jihad from its very beginnings.
The real appeal of Muhammad’s simple message was the compatibility with the uncivilised pagan-tribal nature of Arabian society. In 7th century Arabia one’s loyalty lay with the tribe, mandating a deep-seated enmity of other tribes and groups. Raids between tribes were endless and most tribes such as Muhammad’s were organised within familial lines. Muhammad’s tribe the Quraysh, who ran Mecca, were composed from the same extended familial lines. This pagan-tribal appeal of Submission, in which raiding, brigandage, rape and sexual enslavement were divinely sanctioned explains much of its appeal. The Muslim philosopher Ibn Khaldun (d.1406) described Arab Muslims as the ‘most savage human beings that exist. Compared with sedentary people they are on a level with wild, untamable animals and dumb beasts of prey. Such people are the Arabs’. Hardly a strong endorsement of civilised, religious bearing.
Other uncivilised and pagan tribes were also attracted to Muhammad’s cult. The illiterate, savage Berbers in North Africa became fanatical Muslims invading Spain in the 8th century and again in the 11th and laying waste to much of civilisation in Spain and southern France. The Turks and Mongols likewise embraced the tribal dictates of Muhammad’s primitive cult, with both being uncivilised nomadic, animistic tribes, without any pretence of higher culture. The tribal elements and fiduciary benefits of joining the Jihad were too much to resist. Needless to say, both Turks and Mongols laid waste great swathes of Christian civilisation and territory.
The concept of tribe became the Umma or brotherhood of all Muslims. Muhammad declared in 630 AD after conquering Mecca that ‘a believer shall not slay a believer for the sake of an unbeliever, not shall he aid an unbeliever against a believer’ (example is Koran 4-89, 4-144). The world of the Umma was a stark dichotomy -the supra-tribe of Muhammad against everyone else. Muslims were to become friends with each other to the exclusion of the unbeliever (Ibn Ishaq, 1997, p. 232). The creation of a supra-tribe, supremacist, ‘pure’ and ‘divinely’ sanctioned and supported, gave great energy and confidence to the Muslim Jihad, regenerating itself in violence and blood, as the primitive and savage tribes of the Berbers, Turks and Mongols joined the cult of Muhammad.
Numerous Koranic verses portray the Jihad as the noblest duty of a Muslim. Muhammad stated that ‘Lining up for battle in the path of Allah is worthier than 60 years of worship’. There is a reason why the cult of Islam or Submission does not have monks, monasteries, nuns or convents. The expectation was war, Jihad, and fighting, not praying, prostration and meditation. Muhammad’s Jihad offered not only the Spoils of War (Sura 8 in the Koran), but also an after life of riches and spoils, replete with virgins, young boys, wine and unlimited comforts. It was a win-win for the Jihadi. Die in battle and go to the Muslim-male heaven (nothing similar exists for the Muslim female) to be tantalised by buxom virgins, young boys, food and wine. Or survive and win the battle and satiate your temporal lusts with sex slaves, money, land and loot.
What if a Muslim refused to fight? The Al Lah had a darker and more sinister view of such a person. In Sura 8-15, the Al Lah says that those who don’t fight for the cult will be ‘be tortured like no other sinful human’. If you could not physically fight, you were expected to ‘strive’ or give a greater Jihad, to support the ‘lesser’ or physical-warring Jihad. Money, your property, food, weapons, camels or horses, were expected from those who could not physically saddle up and ride in the Jihad. To further tempt males into joining the cults’ endless, and yearly raiding and warring, the Al Lah promised to commute and expunge all sins and wrong-doings. This was true if you fought and survived, or even more so, if you went on Jihad and perished. For the martyred Jihadi he is, according to Muhammad, precious to the Al Lah, ‘He is forgiven from the first drop of blood (he sheds). He sees his throne in paradise….Fixed atop his head will be a crown of honour, a ruby that is greater than the world and all it contains. And he will copulate with 72 Houris.’ The Houris are supernatural, celestial big breasted nymphs, with ‘wide eyes’, created by the Al Lah as presents and rewards for his deceased Jihadis. That ‘heaven’ for the cult of Muhammad is depicted as a brothel with unlimited food and wine service, and this is unsurprising given the uncivilised and atavistic culture it represents.
Importantly, the Jihadis intentions or Muslimification was unimportant. The only point at issue, was to engage in and support the Jihad. If you didn’t really believe in the Al Lah moon deity or ‘god’, or in Muhammad and kept it to yourself that was fine. Sura 2 depicts Jihad as a business, as a ‘fine loan to Al Lah’ and ‘rejoice in the bargain you have struck for that is the supreme triumph’ (Koran 9-111). For the average tribal male this ‘bargain’ was simply a win-win. If he and the Jihad succeed, he has every chance at becoming wealthy and satisfying carnal lusts with sex slaves. If he dies, he goes to the Muslim brothel in heaven, well-provisioned with targets of lust, food and wine. His piety was unimportant, participating in war was what the Al Lah demanded and rewarded.
Jihad is baked into the Koran and Muhammad’s cult from its inception. Submission or Islam was formed by war and raiding. Its irruption in 632 AD into the Greek-Roman-Christian empire in the ‘East’, created the ‘West’ by destroying 2/3 of Christendom. Christianity in the guise of the Byzantine empire, controlled the Middle East and North Africa, with the Christian Visigoths established in Spain. Within 1 century the Muslims had completely effaced this Christian unity, subjugating most of the Middle East, North African and Spain. The ‘West’ so-called is simply the rump of what had been an extensive Christian empire from Britain to Armenia. Christian groups, churches, buildings, monasteries, libraries, agriculture, industry, hospitals, ports and trade routes were destroyed, taken over, converted or re-directed by Muslims for their own benefit, in their endless Jihad. How many people today know that the term ‘West’ comes from the Middle Ages and means the remaining 1/3 rump of what was once an advanced and vibrant Mediterranean based Christian empire?
If you read Mein Kampf you can't miss the virulent Jew hate, the calls to violence to spread the German-Aryan cult; nor the intolerance against the so-called subhumans which populated Eastern Europe. The program in Mein Kampf is rather clear. Churchill read Hitlers racist-supremacist Bible of Marxist-Nazism and commented that the plan was obvious for all to see. So too was the inevitability of a future war, guaranteed in 1939 by the bankruptcy of the German state.
The Koran is similar to Mein Kampf. The program is rather obvious to any but a delusional multi-culturalist, or those who belong to the anti-American, anti-Western theological movement. The Koran is laced with not only anti-semitic racism, misogny, Jihad, violence, and vituperation against non-beleivers, but it quite clearly demands the annihilation of Christians.
Maybe moderate Muslims and their Marxist-PC cultist enablers can explain the following Koranic injunctions which demand the eradication of Christians:
2:190-193 Fight in the cause of God, those who fight you, but do not transgress limits; for God loveth not transgressors. And slay them wherever ye catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out: For tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter; But fight them not at the sacred Mosque unless they first fight you there; But if they fight you, Slay them. Such is the reward of those who suppress faith. But if they cease, God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful. And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God; but if they cease, Let there be no hostility except to those who practise oppression."
2:216-217 Fighting is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you and that ye love a thing which is bad for you. But God knoweth, and ye know not. They ask thee concerning fighting in the Prohibited Month. Say: "Fighting therein is a grave (offense); but graver is it in the sight of God to prevent access to the path of God, to deny Him, to prevent access to the Sacred Mosque, and drive out its members. Tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter. Nor will they cease fighting you until they turn you back from your faith if they can. And if any of you turn back from their faith and die in unbelief, their works will bear no fruit in this life and in the Hereafter; they will be Companions of the Fire and will abide therein.
2:244-245 Then fight in the cause of God, and know that God heareth and knoweth all things. Who is he that will loan to God a beautiful loan, which God will double unto his credit and multiply many times? It is God that giveth (you) want or plenty, and to Him shall be your return.
4:74-77 Let those fight in the cause of God who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter, to him who fighteth in the cause of God, whether he is slain or gets victory, soon shall We give him a reward of great (value). And why should ye not fight in the cause of God and of those who, being weak, are ill-treated (and oppressed)? Men, women, and children whose cry is: "Our Lord! rescue us from this town, whose people are oppressors; and raise for us from Thee one who will protect; and raise for us from Thee one who will help!" Those who believe fight in the cause of God, and those who reject faith fight in the cause of evil: so fight ye against the friends of Satan: feeble indeed is the cunning of Satan. Hast thou not turned thy vision to those who were told to hold back their hands (form fight) but establish regular prayers and spend in regular charity? When (at length) the order for fighting was issued to them, behold! a section of them feared men as, or even more than, they should have feared God: they say: "Our Lord! why hast Thou ordered us to fight? Wouldst Thou not grant us respite to our (natural) term, near (enough)?" Say: "Short is the enjoyment of this world: the Hereafter is the best for those who do right: never will ye be dealt with unjustly in the very least!
4:95-96 Not equal are those believers who sit (at home) and receive no hurt, and those who strive and fight in the cause of God with their goods and their persons. God hath granted a grade higher to those who strive and fight with their goods and persons than to those who sit (at home). Unto all (in Faith) Hath God promised good: But those who strive and fight Hath He distinguished above those who sit (at home) by a special reward: Ranks specially bestowed by Him, and Forgiveness and Mercy. For God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
5:51 O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily God guideth not a people unjust.
5:72-73: They do blaspheme who say: "God is Christ the son of Mary." But said Christ: "O Children of Israel! worship God, my Lord and your Lord." Whoever joins other gods with God, - God will forbid him the garden, and the Fire will be his abode. There will for the wrongdoers be no one to help. They do blaspheme who say: God is one of three in a Trinity: for there is no god except One God. If they desist not from their word (of blasphemy), verily a grievous penalty will befall the blasphemers among them.
8:12-15 Remember thy Lord inspired the angels (with the message): "I am with you: give firmness to the Believers: I will instil terror into the hearts of the Unbelievers: smite ye above their necks and smite all their finger-tips off them." This because they contended against God and His Apostle: If any contend against God and His Apostle, God is strict in punishment. Thus (will it be said): "Taste ye then of the (punishment): for those who resist God, is the penalty of the Fire." O ye who believe! when ye meet the Unbelievers in hostile array, never turn your backs to them.
8:37-39: In order that God may separate the impure from the pure, put the impure, one on another, heap them together, and cast them into Hell. They will be the ones to have lost. Say to the Unbelievers, if (now) they desist (from Unbelief), their past would be forgiven them; but if they persist, the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of warning for them). And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in God altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily God doth see all that they do.
9:5 But when the forbidden months are past, then fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (trick in war for deceiving and outwitting the enemy); but if they repent, and establish regular prayers and practice regular charity, then open the way for them: for God is Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.
9:14 Fight them, and God will punish them by your hands, cover them with shame, help you (to victory) over them, heal the breasts of Believers
9:20 Those who believe, and suffer exile and fight with might and main, in God's cause, with their goods and their persons, have the highest rank in the sight of God: they are the people who will achieve (salvation).
9:29 "Fight those who believe not in Allah nor the last day, nor hold that forbidden which hath been forbidden by Allah and his apostle nor acknowledge the religion of truth of the people of the Book (the Jews and the Christians) until they pay the Jizya [tax on non-Muslims] with willing submission and feel themselves subdued."
9:41 Go ye forth, (whether equipped) lightly or heavily, and strive and struggle [fight in war], with your goods and your persons, in the cause of God. That is best for you, if ye (but) knew.
9:73 O Prophet! strive hard [wage war] against the unbelievers and the Hypocrites, and be firm against them. Their abode is Hell, - an evil refuge indeed.
9:123: O ye who believe! fight the unbelievers who gird you about, and let them find firmness in you: and know that God is with those who fear Him.
22:38-39 Verily God will defend (from ill) those who believe: verily, God loveth not any that is a traitor to faith, or shows ingratitude. To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight) because they are wronged-and verily, God is Most powerful for their aid
25:52 So obey not the unbelievers and fight strenuously with them in many a strenuous fight.
47:4 Therefore, when ye meet the Unbelievers (in fight), smite at their necks; At length, when ye have thoroughly subdued them, bind a bond firmly (on them): thereafter (is the time for) either generosity or ransom: Until the war lays down its burdens. Thus (are ye commanded): but if it had been God's Will, He could certainly have exacted retribution from them (Himself); but (He lets you fight) in order to test you, some with others. But those who are slain in the Way of God, - He will never let their deeds be lost.
48:29: "Those who follow Muhammad are merciless for the unbelievers but kind to each other."
60:4: We have renounced you; and enmity and hatred is begun between us and you for ever, until ye believe in Allah alone
61:9-11 It is He Who has sent His Apostle with Guidance and the Religion of Truth, that he may proclaim it over all religion, even though the Pagans may detest (it). O ye who believe! shall I lead you to a bargain that will save you from a grievous Penalty?- That ye believe in God and His Apostle, and that ye strive (fight) in the Cause of God, with your property and your persons: that will be best for you, if ye but knew!
66:9 O Prophet! make war on the infidels and hypocrites, and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their abode! and wretched the passage to it!
Seems rather clear doesn't it.
Islam is a poli-cracy whose intent is to impose Sharia Law on all people's and states throughout the world. Sharia Law is a barbaric relic from the 11th century, cemented and codified by Al Ghazali and the Asharite true-believers whose modern legacy is now Sufism and Wahhabism. Far from being 'extremist' the current incarnation of Ghazali's immoderate theology is the true Islam. Kill, enslave, humiliate, tax and dominate all non-Muslims. The program is clear. I am sure that Churchill recognized quite a lot of Mein Kampf in his reading of the Koran.
