French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  


Islam is a cult - Recent Articles

Sura 2 and the Muslim cult of slavery

Why don't Muslims bend knees to Christians, Blacks and non-Muslims?

Bookmark and Share



Sura 2 is the longest Sura in Mohammed's totalitarian charter named compassionately, 'Recital'. Recite, memorize, obey.  Most importantly for Muslims, obey Muhammad.  This is the foundation stone for the Muslim cult.  Sura 2 discusses at length, ‘slavery’.  Slavery is not only accepted in Mein Koran, but applauded, supported, and encouraged.  Enslavement of non-Muslims is a part of Jihad and can take many forms, including sex-slavery of Infidel women, slaves captured in war, or conquered populations supporting their Muslim masters through Jizya and the tax system, where male Muslims are not required to work.


The greatest Black-slave traders in history were of course Muslims.  Sura 2 provides the compelling motivations as to why.  50 million or more Black Africans were shipped into Muslim-Arab heartlands as workers, sex-slaves, eunuchs or future soldiers.  No Black culture exists in Muslims states.  25 million Whites were enslaved, worked to death, or used as soldiers and sex-workers.  Mongolian and Muslim ‘Tartars’, Ottomans, various Arab Caliphates in the Levant, North Africa and Spain; all traded in white-slavery.  No knees are bended by Muslims to Blacks and Whites of course.  Only the White man must kneel.


Sura 2 makes it clear that ‘good’ Moslems should accept the existence of being a 'slave', as well as ‘owning’ Infidel slaves.  Slavery as a theme in Muhammad’s cult has 2 main threads.  The first, is that a Muslim is a slave of Muhammad and the moon-idol of Mecca Baal, or Al-Lah (the Lord).  The second, is that owning slaves is a right inherent in Muslim supremacism.  Muhammad owned 20 or so sex-slaves as well as Black slaves.  He did free one Black slave (one of his earliest converts), but only if he joined his movement.  A key motivation for the Muslim Jihad was slave ownership either for sexual gratification, or for labour and military conscription.  It is estimated that just from the Balkans over 300 years, about 2 million Christian boys (slaves) were ‘converted’ starting at the age of 7, to serve in the Muslim armies as ‘Janissaries’, the most feared legions of Ottoman soldiers.  Apparently modern-day Turks are not bending knees to those non-Muslims living in Balkan nations today.


The use of the nouns ‘slave’ or ‘slaves’, runs throughout the width and breadth of the Koran. There are about 420 pages in the Koran. The word 'slaves' appears on 226 of them. The word 'slave' singular, makes a guest appearance on 109 pages. Together 'slave' and 'slaves' are found in 335 pages or about 80% of the Koran. At the verse level these terms comprise 5% of the verses out the Koranic total of 6236. It does appear that this Al-Lah thing, idol, Hub'al, Muhammad, is rather preoccupied with supine submission. Witness the ravings in Sura 2 about slaves usually married with violence against the hated Unbelievers:



How bad is that for which they have sold their ownselves, that they should disbelieve in that which Allah has revealed (the Qur'an), grudging that Allah should reveal of His Grace unto whom He will of His slaves. So they have drawn on themselves wrath upon wrath. And for the disbelievers, there is disgracing torment.


And when My slaves ask you (O Muhammad SAW) concerning Me, then (answer them), I am indeed near (to them by My Knowledge). I respond to the invocations of the supplicant when he calls on Me (without any mediator or intercessor). So let them obey Me and believe in Me, so that they may be led aright.


And of mankind is he who would sell himself, seeking the Pleasure of Allah. And Allah is full of Kindness to (His) slaves.


Muhammad is referenced as the most important slave of the Al-Lah, with the usual and rather ridiculous refrain 'peace be upon him', whenever his hallowed name is invoked. This for a man who slaughtered, butchered, murdered, slave-traded, erected so to speak a large personal harem, and died fat and covered in gold, poisoned or strangled [or both] by his own men. See Sura 2:23. Sura 2:221 makes the startling revelation that being a slave of Muhammad or Al-Lah, is preferable to being a disbelieving free-man.




And if you (Arab pagans, Jews, and Christians) are in doubt concerning that which We have sent down (i.e. the Qur'an) to Our slave (Muhammad Peace be upon him), then produce a Surah (chapter) of the like thereof and call your witnesses (supporters and helpers) besides Allah, if you are truthful.



And do not marry Al-Mushrikat (idolatresses, etc.) till they believe (worship Allah Alone). And indeed a slave woman who believes is better than a (free) Mushrikah (idolatress, etc.), even though she pleases you. And give not (your daughters) in marriage to Al-Mushrikun till they believe (in Allah Alone) and verily, a believing slave is better than a (free) Mushrik (idolater, etc.), even though he pleases you. Those (Al-Mushrikun) invite you to the Fire, but Allah invites (you) to Paradise and Forgiveness by His Leave, and makes His Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) clear to mankind that they may remember.


Slavery is the new freedom in the Koran. Free yourself by submitting to Al-Lah and Muhammad and do not question what the Koran states.  All the blessings of the Meccan moon deity will be bestowed upon your person in the male-Moslem heaven, with eternal delights to occupy your time. The Koran has nothing to say about what female Moslem 'slaves' will get from the Al-lah idol, Baal.


To be fair in 2:177 there is reference made to freeing slaves – as long as they join the cult of course. One of Muhammad's first converts was his personal black slave. Islam is famously racist, with those entering hell possessing 'black faces' and Kaffir originally designating a black slave – one of the lowliest life forms in the Moslem hierarchy. Free your slaves to join the cult of Al-Lah, and your 'Lord' will be pleased, as long as you know that you must fight for him or it:




It is not Al-Birr (piety, righteousness, and each and every act of obedience to Allah, etc.) that you turn your faces towards east and (or) west (in prayers); but Al-Birr is (the quality of) the one who believes in Allah, the Last Day, the Angels, the Book, the Prophets and gives his wealth, in spite of love for it, to the kinsfolk, to the orphans, and to Al-Masakin (the poor), and to the wayfarer, and to those who ask, and to set slaves free, performs As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), and gives the Zakat, and who fulfill their covenant when they make it, and who are As-Sabirin (the patient ones, etc.) in extreme poverty and ailment (disease) and at the time of fighting (during the battles). Such are the people of the truth and they are Al-Muttaqun (pious - see V.2:2).


In Moslem jurisprudence the Koranic 'legal' ideal of an eye for an eye, is usually followed and believed by the more pious. If you commit a crime against a Moslem's slave than he has a right to commit a similar action against your slave. This 'Law of equality in punishment' is a pre-iron age code, which historically can be traced to neo-Babylonian times of 1700 B.C. It is crude and not a program of jurisprudence but one of simplistic reciprocation. Today of course the relativists accept this rather banal code as an alternative form of 'justice' embedded in the various implementation of Sharia or Koranic 'law'.




O you who believe! Al-Qisas (the Law of Equality in punishment) is prescribed for you in case of murder: the free for the free, the slave for the slave, and the female for the female. But if the killer is forgiven by the brother (or the relatives, etc.) of the killed against blood money, then adhering to it with fairness and payment of the blood money, to the heir should be made in fairness. This is an alleviation and a mercy from your Lord. So after this whoever transgresses the limits (i.e. kills the killer after taking the blood money), he shall have a painful torment.


Slavery was and is rife within Islam. The Islamic irruptions were in large measure the attack on sophisticated civilizations by barbarous desert peoples seeking wealth, booty, women and manufactured products. Slavery is accepted as a de-facto part of existence within Islam. Curious then, that a cult focused on pre-modern slavery and its attendant immorality, is deemed to be a religion.


Muhammadanism and the cult of Submission (Islam) has always been a failure

The demise of the cult of Muhammad is assured

Bookmark and Share



Islam has failed due to many factors, but a central reason is that Islam is a hyper dictatorial religion. It is premised on centralized control, on only one way to live, one book to believe, one prophet to follow, one belief that is superior to all others and a view of the world that is male anthropomorphic [females need not apply], and disdains other cultures. Christianity and the Bible are totally different. In Islam there is less flexibility in interpretation [only about the real blood lines of the true Prophet], and less curiosity in trying to resolve complex intellectual questions about the Trinity for instance, or the meaning of the 'Son' of God [how can a God be his own Son?].


This type of intellectual ferment is indicative of a culture that is content to debate and understand and not merely follow.  Christianity invented science and rational inquiry.  Christians have always wanted to know more about God’s purpose and design, to uncover the secrets of the created world, to comprehend the obvious patterns and construction of the world around them.  Not so with Muhammad’s cult.  Blind obedience to the book Recital (Koran) is all that is needed.


There is plenty of written testimony that from about 900 A.D. onwards the Christians were far more interested in the Muhammadans than vice versa.  Muhammadan chronicles rarely mention the 'Franks' [the Muhammadan name for all Westerners], except to state that they provide abundant slave material. The Christians traded, travelled and warred against the Muhammadans and were quite fascinated by many aspects of Muslim society, recognising that Muslims were squatting on former Christian lands, rich and advanced when they were conquered.  The Christians for all their mistakes, travails and atrocities, were more willing to change, innovate and get ahead then the Muslims, who never really took seriously the incipient threat from the 'Franks'. If they had spent some time understanding the Europeans maybe they would not have fallen so far behind especially post 1683 after their defeat at Vienna.


Islam by its construction expects obedience, and does not elevate curiosity, experimentation, or technology creation. It is a self-contained philosophy - the outside world is inferior and therefore of little interest.  The Muslim world, the only truth and purpose. Such a society can only attain a certain level before rot and corruption sets in. Any country or empire that has access to easy resources, and easy trade money will inevitably fail, if its political system is 'Oriental' ie. despotic or centralized and based upon nepotism and fear as opposed to talent and freedom.


Muhammadanism is a religion that the ancient Greeks living in the time of tyrannous or the first tyrants would have recognized quite easily. A state religion, a set of concrete rules and limitations on freedom and trade and innovation, all to ensure that the society is not corrupted. That is what the Communists attempted in Russia and the Nazis in Germany as well. Their religion was socialism. A variant of tyrannous.


Christianity on the other hand has instilled in Western culture the following important ideals:

1. It provides a necessary bulwark against State power.

2. Christian thought makes the individual accountable for his/her actions. This is a large step forward in ethics and self- determination. Islam has no such belief.

3. Christianity is concerned with the salvation of all souls regardless of caste, income or success. By extension it teaches patience and peace as opposed to war and gaining of spoils.

4. Christianity teaches about freedom to choose, to live and to express inner spirituality without being victimized. This is another large step forward in building harmonious relationships in society.


For these reasons and some others, it is important to remember that Western society is a Judeo-Christian framework. Such a framework is diametrically opposed by Islam which is a thought system to unify society - both state and church. Christ taught that Caesar and God are separate. Tolerance, charity, responsibility, dignity were prime traits of the good Christian.


Muhammadanism on the other hand teaches people intolerance. Non – believers, heathen and Jews are targeted for either conversion or destruction. The very name Islam means ‘submission’. Islam and the Koran are quite clear – they preach that the world must be Islamicized and must submit to the rule of the Koran. Any and all means including war and terror to achieve this goal is justified. Terror in the name of Islam is a daily event. Such a philosophy facilitates and breeds its own inner demise. It spawns hate and horror. Islam has quite obviously has failed its constituents. This is why 55 % of young Arabs want to leave according to recent reports. When most of the population is illiterate and half-starved, I find it difficult to state as the Liberal media does that Islam is peaceful, coherent and cultured. Even in moderate countries the religion is abusive to the population and negates modernity.


A philosophy which avows an intention in keeping someone ignorant poor and spiteful does not constitute either a noble religious ideal or good governance. It would be as if someone said to me 'you know the Nazi pagan philosophy of life has its merits...or… you know communist godlessness is really a moral philosophy elevating the community above god...."


There is a grand difference between religious modernity and religious backwardness. This is the issue. “For Muslims, Islam is not merely a system of belief and worship, a compartment of life, so to speak, distinct from other compartments which are the concern of nonreligious authorities administering nonreligious laws. It is rather the whole of life, and its rules include civil, criminal and even what we would call constitutional law.” B. Lewis, Islam and the West.


Muhammadanism is monolithic, unreformable, immovable and mired in bronze-age dogma. In the modern world the violent expression of Islam kills Jews, Muslims, Christians, Atheists and Buddhists. There is no logic, no reason, no attempt by the Islamicists to understand their own hatred, their own anger and their own failure. It is easier to blame someone else. This is why Islam is a failure.


Muhammad's cult and Hate speech. Somehow the pious Western 'tolerant' misses the obvious.

Mein Koran is an injunction to war.

Bookmark and Share




1400 years of Jihad.  1400 years of proof of Muslim supremacism and racism (Black, Brown and White Slave trading, Sex Jihad in the UK elsewhere against White girls). 1400 years of Koranic hate-speech proffered by Muslim religious zealots and warlords.  1400 years of war against the Infidel. 


Yet, for self-proclaimed geniuses, Western multi-cultists, the religious cult of ‘tolerance and diversity’, there is a fascistic intolerance to any who criticise the cult of Muhammad or who reveal the factual history of Muslim Jihad and the current Muslim warring against the Infidel in all its various guises.  For these lights of delusion, such Muhammadan-critics are phobic, bigoted and should be put on a ‘racist register’ and monitored by the Police (one assumes Muslim or non-White policemen would do the surveillance), or perhaps just shot and dumped into a mass grave.


Does anyone still read?  If you read Mein Koran, the ‘root cause’ of Muslim fascism and war becomes rather obvious.  Take the first part of this execrable book.  Suras 2 to 10 comprise 134 pages of the Koran, or fully 32% of the book. This first third of the Koran contains 1466 verses. No less than 348 of these verses, or 24% of the total preach violence against the Infidel.  The rest of the book is no better.  To be specific about ‘violence’ we can define violence in using the following dictionary terms:


1 a: exertion of physical force so as to injure or abuse (as in warfare effecting illegal entry into a house) b :an instance of violent treatment or procedure

2: injury by or as if by distortion, infringement, or profanation: outrage

3a: intense, turbulent, or furious and often destructive action or force <the violence of the storm b:vehement feeling or expression :fervor; also:an instance of such action or feeling c :a clashing or jarring quality : discordance

4: undue alteration (as of wording or sense in editing a text)


Mein Koran satisfies the above definition of violence.  It is a book which promotes a raging violence and hate of the Infidel or non-Muslim.  Almost every single page broadcasts inter-alia: use of physical force against Infidels; injury; profanation against non-Muslims; furious destructive action against the ‘enemies’ of Muhammad; violent, vehement feelings against Jews and Christians; a philosophical world-view of the discordant nature of non-Muslim society which must be either subjugated or destroyed.  Violence is the core, underlying characteristic of the Muhammadan books, the Koran, Hadiths and Sira (biography of Muhammad).


Table:  Violent verses in the first 10 Sura’s


Total Verses

Number of Verses of violence against the Infidel

% of violent verses of the total










































The first 10 books of Mein Koran are the most important.  They are the ‘longer Suras’ which detail the organisation, ethos, and imperialistic organisation of Muhammad’s cult.  They are lurid with hate, violence and adjudications to war against the Infidel.  There is no compromise here.  The world is split between the adherents of Muhammad and the rest.  Those who are outside the cult of Muhammad have few choices.  They must surrender to Muslims, be conquered and used as tax slaves for Muslims and ruled by Muslims within the ‘House of Islam’, or killed and erased.  That is it.


Moslems cannot make the argument that the other 75% of Mein Koran is centred upon an ethical program of free-will, tolerance and inter-faith harmony. None of these attributes can be found anywhere in the Koran including the only 2 passages that the multi-cult can quote namely Sura 109 and 2:256, which do not advocate peace or tolerance but quite the opposite if one bothers to read the verses before and after the out-of-context-lines oft-quoted as evidence of Muslim-inter faith love and dialogue (See here, here and here for refutations of the claims that either Sura is about the Golden Rule or tolerance).


Beyond Sura 10, most of the text which is not dealing with 'punishing' the 'wrong doers and criminals', is busy with demands of submission and cult obedience to both Muhammad and Allah [are they the same, a good question rarely asked?].


It is clear that if 25% of the first 1466 verses preach violence, hate and jihad against the Infidel that we have a document of power and aggression, not one concerned with humanism, free-will, piety, and faith through reason and understanding including the use of a Golden Rule. None of these characteristics can be found anywhere in the Koran.  Jihad or the call to war has many names in the Koran, it is simply untrue that the Koran does not advocate Jihad [see here for an example], or the destruction of Infidels.  The whole objective of the Koran is to promote violence, hate and anger against non-Muslims.  Maybe the pious members of the Multi-Kult might wish to actually read the foundational documents of Muhammad’s cult.