French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  

Back

Islam is a cult - Recent Articles

Muhammadanism and the cult of Submission (Islam) has always been a failure

The demise of the cult of Muhammad is assured

Bookmark and Share

 

 

Islam has failed due to many factors, but a central reason is that Islam is a hyper dictatorial religion. It is premised on centralized control, on only one way to live, one book to believe, one prophet to follow, one belief that is superior to all others and a view of the world that is male anthropomorphic [females need not apply], and disdains other cultures. Christianity and the Bible are totally different. In Islam there is less flexibility in interpretation [only about the real blood lines of the true Prophet], and less curiosity in trying to resolve complex intellectual questions about the Trinity for instance, or the meaning of the 'Son' of God [how can a God be his own Son?].

 

This type of intellectual ferment is indicative of a culture that is content to debate and understand and not merely follow.  Christianity invented science and rational inquiry.  Christians have always wanted to know more about God’s purpose and design, to uncover the secrets of the created world, to comprehend the obvious patterns and construction of the world around them.  Not so with Muhammad’s cult.  Blind obedience to the book Recital (Koran) is all that is needed.

 

There is plenty of written testimony that from about 900 A.D. onwards the Christians were far more interested in the Muhammadans than vice versa.  Muhammadan chronicles rarely mention the 'Franks' [the Muhammadan name for all Westerners], except to state that they provide abundant slave material. The Christians traded, travelled and warred against the Muhammadans and were quite fascinated by many aspects of Muslim society, recognising that Muslims were squatting on former Christian lands, rich and advanced when they were conquered.  The Christians for all their mistakes, travails and atrocities, were more willing to change, innovate and get ahead then the Muslims, who never really took seriously the incipient threat from the 'Franks'. If they had spent some time understanding the Europeans maybe they would not have fallen so far behind especially post 1683 after their defeat at Vienna.

 

Islam by its construction expects obedience, and does not elevate curiosity, experimentation, or technology creation. It is a self-contained philosophy - the outside world is inferior and therefore of little interest.  The Muslim world, the only truth and purpose. Such a society can only attain a certain level before rot and corruption sets in. Any country or empire that has access to easy resources, and easy trade money will inevitably fail, if its political system is 'Oriental' ie. despotic or centralized and based upon nepotism and fear as opposed to talent and freedom.

 

Muhammadanism is a religion that the ancient Greeks living in the time of tyrannous or the first tyrants would have recognized quite easily. A state religion, a set of concrete rules and limitations on freedom and trade and innovation, all to ensure that the society is not corrupted. That is what the Communists attempted in Russia and the Nazis in Germany as well. Their religion was socialism. A variant of tyrannous.

 

Christianity on the other hand has instilled in Western culture the following important ideals:

1. It provides a necessary bulwark against State power.

2. Christian thought makes the individual accountable for his/her actions. This is a large step forward in ethics and self- determination. Islam has no such belief.

3. Christianity is concerned with the salvation of all souls regardless of caste, income or success. By extension it teaches patience and peace as opposed to war and gaining of spoils.

4. Christianity teaches about freedom to choose, to live and to express inner spirituality without being victimized. This is another large step forward in building harmonious relationships in society.

 

For these reasons and some others, it is important to remember that Western society is a Judeo-Christian framework. Such a framework is diametrically opposed by Islam which is a thought system to unify society - both state and church. Christ taught that Caesar and God are separate. Tolerance, charity, responsibility, dignity were prime traits of the good Christian.

 

Muhammadanism on the other hand teaches people intolerance. Non – believers, heathen and Jews are targeted for either conversion or destruction. The very name Islam means ‘submission’. Islam and the Koran are quite clear – they preach that the world must be Islamicized and must submit to the rule of the Koran. Any and all means including war and terror to achieve this goal is justified. Terror in the name of Islam is a daily event. Such a philosophy facilitates and breeds its own inner demise. It spawns hate and horror. Islam has quite obviously has failed its constituents. This is why 55 % of young Arabs want to leave according to recent reports. When most of the population is illiterate and half-starved, I find it difficult to state as the Liberal media does that Islam is peaceful, coherent and cultured. Even in moderate countries the religion is abusive to the population and negates modernity.

 

A philosophy which avows an intention in keeping someone ignorant poor and spiteful does not constitute either a noble religious ideal or good governance. It would be as if someone said to me 'you know the Nazi pagan philosophy of life has its merits...or… you know communist godlessness is really a moral philosophy elevating the community above god...."

 

There is a grand difference between religious modernity and religious backwardness. This is the issue. “For Muslims, Islam is not merely a system of belief and worship, a compartment of life, so to speak, distinct from other compartments which are the concern of nonreligious authorities administering nonreligious laws. It is rather the whole of life, and its rules include civil, criminal and even what we would call constitutional law.” B. Lewis, Islam and the West.

 

Muhammadanism is monolithic, unreformable, immovable and mired in bronze-age dogma. In the modern world the violent expression of Islam kills Jews, Muslims, Christians, Atheists and Buddhists. There is no logic, no reason, no attempt by the Islamicists to understand their own hatred, their own anger and their own failure. It is easier to blame someone else. This is why Islam is a failure.

 

Muhammad's cult and Hate speech. Somehow the pious Western 'tolerant' misses the obvious.

Mein Koran is an injunction to war.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

 

1400 years of Jihad.  1400 years of proof of Muslim supremacism and racism (Black, Brown and White Slave trading, Sex Jihad in the UK elsewhere against White girls). 1400 years of Koranic hate-speech proffered by Muslim religious zealots and warlords.  1400 years of war against the Infidel. 

 

Yet, for self-proclaimed geniuses, Western multi-cultists, the religious cult of ‘tolerance and diversity’, there is a fascistic intolerance to any who criticise the cult of Muhammad or who reveal the factual history of Muslim Jihad and the current Muslim warring against the Infidel in all its various guises.  For these lights of delusion, such Muhammadan-critics are phobic, bigoted and should be put on a ‘racist register’ and monitored by the Police (one assumes Muslim or non-White policemen would do the surveillance), or perhaps just shot and dumped into a mass grave.

 

Does anyone still read?  If you read Mein Koran, the ‘root cause’ of Muslim fascism and war becomes rather obvious.  Take the first part of this execrable book.  Suras 2 to 10 comprise 134 pages of the Koran, or fully 32% of the book. This first third of the Koran contains 1466 verses. No less than 348 of these verses, or 24% of the total preach violence against the Infidel.  The rest of the book is no better.  To be specific about ‘violence’ we can define violence in using the following dictionary terms:

 

1 a: exertion of physical force so as to injure or abuse (as in warfare effecting illegal entry into a house) b :an instance of violent treatment or procedure

2: injury by or as if by distortion, infringement, or profanation: outrage

3a: intense, turbulent, or furious and often destructive action or force <the violence of the storm b:vehement feeling or expression :fervor; also:an instance of such action or feeling c :a clashing or jarring quality : discordance

4: undue alteration (as of wording or sense in editing a text)

 

Mein Koran satisfies the above definition of violence.  It is a book which promotes a raging violence and hate of the Infidel or non-Muslim.  Almost every single page broadcasts inter-alia: use of physical force against Infidels; injury; profanation against non-Muslims; furious destructive action against the ‘enemies’ of Muhammad; violent, vehement feelings against Jews and Christians; a philosophical world-view of the discordant nature of non-Muslim society which must be either subjugated or destroyed.  Violence is the core, underlying characteristic of the Muhammadan books, the Koran, Hadiths and Sira (biography of Muhammad).

 

Table:  Violent verses in the first 10 Sura’s

Sura

Total Verses

Number of Verses of violence against the Infidel

% of violent verses of the total

2

286

42

15%

3

200

54

27

4

176

49

30

5

120

42

35

6

165

24

15

7

206

37

18

8

75

33

42

9

129

52

40

10

109

15

14

Total

1466

348

24%

 

The first 10 books of Mein Koran are the most important.  They are the ‘longer Suras’ which detail the organisation, ethos, and imperialistic organisation of Muhammad’s cult.  They are lurid with hate, violence and adjudications to war against the Infidel.  There is no compromise here.  The world is split between the adherents of Muhammad and the rest.  Those who are outside the cult of Muhammad have few choices.  They must surrender to Muslims, be conquered and used as tax slaves for Muslims and ruled by Muslims within the ‘House of Islam’, or killed and erased.  That is it.

 

Moslems cannot make the argument that the other 75% of Mein Koran is centred upon an ethical program of free-will, tolerance and inter-faith harmony. None of these attributes can be found anywhere in the Koran including the only 2 passages that the multi-cult can quote namely Sura 109 and 2:256, which do not advocate peace or tolerance but quite the opposite if one bothers to read the verses before and after the out-of-context-lines oft-quoted as evidence of Muslim-inter faith love and dialogue (See here, here and here for refutations of the claims that either Sura is about the Golden Rule or tolerance).

 

Beyond Sura 10, most of the text which is not dealing with 'punishing' the 'wrong doers and criminals', is busy with demands of submission and cult obedience to both Muhammad and Allah [are they the same, a good question rarely asked?].

 

It is clear that if 25% of the first 1466 verses preach violence, hate and jihad against the Infidel that we have a document of power and aggression, not one concerned with humanism, free-will, piety, and faith through reason and understanding including the use of a Golden Rule. None of these characteristics can be found anywhere in the Koran.  Jihad or the call to war has many names in the Koran, it is simply untrue that the Koran does not advocate Jihad [see here for an example], or the destruction of Infidels.  The whole objective of the Koran is to promote violence, hate and anger against non-Muslims.  Maybe the pious members of the Multi-Kult might wish to actually read the foundational documents of Muhammad’s cult.

 

The Cult of Muhammad is a failure. It breeds nothing but hate and violence.

There is no place in the modern world, for a bronze age cult addicted to sex and violence.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

 

Islam has failed due to many factors, but a central reason is that Islam is a hyper dictatorial religion. It is premised on centralized control, on only one way to live, one book to believe, one prophet to follow, one belief that is superior to all others and a view of the world that is male anthropomorphic [females need not apply], addicted to male sexual pleasure (females and young boys); and a cult which does not tolerate other cultures. Christianity and the Bible are totally different. The Bible is a collection of laws, truths, stories, parables and histories that develop civilisation.  This is why European civilisation rose to its heights.  It was premised on the combined faith, reason and energy of Jerusalem, Athens, Rome and the Catholic Church.  

 

In Islam there is less flexibility in interpretation [only about the real blood lines of the Brigand-leader], and less curiosity in trying to resolve complex intellectual questions about the Trinity for instance, or the meaning of the 'Son' of God [how can a God be his own Son?]. This type of intellectual ferment is indicative of a culture that is content to debate and understand and not merely follow [witness the Reformation, Luther, Erasmus and the Counter Reformation replete unfortunately with the horror of the 30 years War plus a myriad of unenlightened other tragedies and non-science (abiogenesis et al)].

 

There is plenty of written testimony that from about 900 AD onwards the Christians were far more interested in the Arabs and Moslems than vice versa. Arab chronicles rarely mention the 'Franks' [the Arab name for all Westerners], except to state that they provide abundant slave material. The Christians traded, travelled and warred against the Arabs and were quite fascinated by many aspects of Muslim society [though not by their religion, neither side apparently had much interest in understanding the other's religious doctrine]. The Christians for all their mistakes, travails and atrocities, were more willing to change, innovate and get ahead then the Arabs, who never really took seriously the incipient threat from the 'Franks'. If they had spent some time understanding the Europeans maybe they would not have fallen so far behind especially post 1683 after their defeat at Vienna.

 

Islam by its construction expects obedience, and does not elevate curiosity, experimentation or technology creation. It is a contained world - the outside world is inferior and therefore of little interest. Such a society can only attain a certain level before rot and corruption sets in. Any country or empire that has access to easy resources, and easy trade money will inevitably fail, if its political system is 'Oriental' ie. despotic or centralized and based upon nepotism and fear as opposed to talent and freedom.

 

Islam fits the bill. It is a religion that the ancient Greeks living in the time of tyrannos or the first tyrants would have recognized quite easily. A state religion, a set of concrete rules and limitations on freedom and trade and innovation, all to ensure that the society is not corrupted. That is what the Communists attempted in Russia and the National Socialists in Germany, as well. Their religion was Atheist-Socialism. A variant of tyrannos.  Today, Globaloneywarming, Covidism, One-World governance are simply totalitarian constructs that differ little from Sargon the Great’s empire in the 4th millennium BC.

 

Christianity on the other hand has instilled in Western culture the following important ideals:

1. It provides a necessary bulwark against State power.

2. Christian thought makes the individual accountable for his/her actions. This is a large step forward in ethics and self- determination. Islam has no such belief.

3. Christianity is concerned with the salvation of all souls regardless of caste, income or success. By extension it teaches forgiveness, a form of love based patience and peace, as opposed to war and gaining of spoils.

4. Christianity teaches about freedom to choose, to live and to express inner spirituality without being victimized. This is another large step forward in building harmonious relationships in society.

 

For these reasons and many others, it is important to remember that Western society is a Judeo-Christian framework. Such a framework is diametrically opposed by Islam which is a thought system to unify society - both state and church. Christ taught that Caesar and God are separate. Tolerance, charity, responsibility, dignity were prime traits of the good Christian.  Koranic doctrine is openly hostile to Christianity and Christians preaching the eradication (or conversion) of both to Muhammadanism (the rightful name of his cult).

 

Unlike Christianity, Islam on the other hand teaches people intolerance. Non–believers, heathen and Jews are targeted for either conversion or destruction. The very name Islam means ‘submission’. Islam and the Koran are quite clear – they preach that the world must be Islamicized and must submit to the rule of the Koran. Any and all means including war and terror to achieve this goal is justified. Terror in the name of Islam is a daily event. Such a philosophy facilitates and breeds its own inner demise. It spawns hate and horror. Islam has quite obviously has failed its constituents.

 

That the cult of Muhammad is a gigantic failure is quite evident in the flows of millions of Muslims to White-European, North America and Oceania states.  Millions of Muslims would invade Europe tomorrow if the borders were thrown wide open and access granted.  The host countries have been ‘enriched’ by Moslem crime, massive unemployment, mosque-building (which is the centre of Jihad), Jihadic attacks, Church attacks (including the arson of Notre Dame), the rapes of hundreds of thousands of white girls, and abuse of local and national cultures.  For the deeply ignorant, the critical race theorists and the Low IQs, all of this carnage is enriching.  It should be self-evident to Westerners, just watching Moslems in their midst that the cult of polygamy, FGM, violence and racism is a massive failure.

 

There is a grand difference between religious modernity and religious backwardness. This is the issue. “For Muslims, Islam is not merely a system of belief and worship, a compartment of life, so to speak, distinct from other compartments which are the concern of nonreligious authorities administering nonreligious laws. It is rather the whole of life, and its rules include civil, criminal and even what we would call constitutional law.” B. Lewis, Islam and the West.

 

Submission or Islam is monolithic, unreformable, immovable and mired in bronze-age pagan Arab dogma. The Al Lah for example is not God, but Baal the moon deity of Mecca (the Lord of Mecca or the Al Lah); Muhammad’s family were Baal’s caretakers.  The cult is saturated with Bronze age rituals (kissing an asteroid, throwing rocks at little demons, circumambulations around the main shrine, polygamy, sex slavery etc).

 

In the modern world the violent expression of Muhammadanism kills Jews, Muslims, Christians, Atheists and Buddhists. There is no logic, no reason, no attempt by Muslims to understand their own hatred, their own anger and their own failure. It is easier to blame someone else and always claim victimhood – always the sign of a loser and a cult of failure.  Western apologists and acolytes who admire and actively support the failure of Muhammadanism and its attendant culture destruction are nothing but a collection of 'useful idiots' and civilisation destroying ignoramuses.