French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was  superior to anything Islam had developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions.  Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'.  Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.   

Back

Dhummies/Islamophobia - Recent Articles

The Dhimmi Islamophiles and Corona Fascism

Dhimmitude and Coronatude both attract the same variety of liberal-fascist.

Bookmark and Share

 

 Dhimmitude:

...a uniform civilization developed throughout the centuries by all non-Muslim indigenous people, who were vanquished by jihad-war and governed by shari'a law. It is this civilization which is called dhimmitude. It is characterized by the different strategies developed by each dhimmi group to survive as non-Muslim entity in their Islamized countries. Dhimmitude is not exclusively concerned with Muslim history and civilization. Rather it investigates the history of those non-Muslim peoples conquered and colonized by jihad. [See Baat Yeor].

 

Coronatude:

...a uniform civilization developed throughout the past 6 decades in all G20 countries, who were vanquished by government propaganda, oppression, criminal pharmaceutical firms and endless drugs posing as ‘vaccines’… leading to ‘vaccine law’. It is this civilization which is called Coronatude. It is characterized by the different strategies developed by each conquered group within the G20, to survive as non-vaxxed entity in their Vaccinated countries. Coronatude is not exclusively concerned with vaccine history and civilization. Rather it investigates the history of those non-vaxxed peoples conquered and colonized by government and pharma. [See myself].

 

From Dhimmitude to Coronatude.  For many it is simply a straight line, an extension, another stamp on their card of ‘political acceptance’ or ‘science’.  They see nothing wrong with the Muslim or Pharma-Government Jihad.  Both are perfectly sensible in their opinion.  Both are justified by ‘science’ and the ‘crimes’ of Christians or the unjabbed.  Both are necessary to correct historical ‘wrongs’.  Both are valid to ‘improve civilisation’, ‘health’, ‘diversity’, and amend our own ‘bias’.

 

The cults usually parading around with banners declaring ‘science’, who support Corona Fascism (death rate of 0.1% which negates the idea of a pandemic), evolution (the magic of multi-cellular functionality inside billions-soon trillions of years), warming from a rounding error trace chemical 95% emitted by Gaia; are usually the same groups who support the ‘religion’ of Muhammadanism and open-borders.  Not always.  But more often than not, this is true.   These groups have overlapping memberships and personnel and are often found ‘co-existing’ within major ‘political’ parties as part of their standard platforms and pablum.  Few if any of the media, corporate leaders or politicians are not from these same groups.

 

The reason these fellow travellers flock together under the same set of standards is straightforward.  None of these groups and their acolytes possess critical thinking skills, nor do most live in the world of the 5 senses.  They are ignorant of history, data, real science and basic biology.  They hypocritically hate white-Christian premised civilisation and want to tear it down (warming, ‘green energy’, ‘open borders’, anti-Christian, anti-white racism) while enjoying its benefices. They are the modern communist revolutionary, demanding a ‘great reset’, of what exactly, why, and to the benefit of whom, they can’t say.  Most of these quasi-literates classify themselves as ‘liberals’ which is a word without meaning, only edified when one analyses their programmes which are quite fascistic in political orientation.  All their programmes centre on government control, mass compliance and hypnosis and endless drugging and terrorising.  There is nothing ‘liberal’, ‘intelligent’, or ‘progressive’ in the demented minds of these modern Robespierres, Lenins or Nazis.  They are the same age-old detritus who are attracted to cults of oppression and totalitarianism including Corona, Green movements and Muhammadanism.

 

In 1400 years of Muslim Jihad there are at least 25 million Christian Whites taken as slaves by Muslim Jihad, ranging from the Mongolian, to the Turkish, Arab and North African.  The Spanish Jihad from 710 AD to 1492 AD, history’s longest war, was composed of Arabs, Berbers and Blacks.  It is hard to calculate the cost in slavery and destruction during these 800 years.  Modern ‘historians’, ‘commentators’ and ‘experts’, only genuflect to the ‘great influence’ Muslims had on Spain.  They ignore the rape, the war, the slaughter and the destruction of countless buildings and art.  Over 800 years no fewer than 5.000 Christians per annum, would be enslaved in the yearly ‘razzias’ from Muslim occupied Hispania into Christian enclaves.  This is a low estimate.  We therefore have just in Spain, some 4 million Christians over 800 years taken as slaves.

 

In Spain alone, over 800 years, some 4 million White Christians were enslaved by Black, Arab, and Berbers (Romano-indigenous mix).

 

No knee bending by Blacks, Arabs or Muslims to White Christians.  In fact, the opposite.  A complete disavowal of this slavery.  A complaint that it was the fault of the enslaved, with the rapacious, ‘anti-science’ Roman Catholic Church, being in the way of the great, ‘intellectual’, ‘achievements’, of illiterate Arabs and Bedouin, who were stupefied by the wealth, the art, the buildings and the cities of 8th century Spain.  In this revisionism, the vast economic and social wealth of Spain was not due to Romano-Visigothic civilisation, but amazingly imported on the swords of Muhammadanism.

 

No one discusses the Muslim Jihad, rape and slaughter.  In such a dystopian fantasy, it is therefore to be expected, that open borders, more ‘Muslims’, more ‘diversity’, are the only ‘accepted science’, even as Muslim rape, crime, welfare payments and the destruction of Churches including Notre Dame across Western states, continues to set records and only increases in quantity and volume.  To promote any other policy is to be a ‘racist’, a ‘phobe’, an ‘ultra right nationalist’, and probably a ‘Nazi’.

 

The same litany of ignorance is displayed by the same people in their slavish obeisance to a fake pandemic.  The people who accept the Corona narrative, ignore the dead and wounded from Pharma-poisons, who imbibe with religious fervour the anti-science of Fake News and totalitarian governments, and who openly wish for their own imprisonment, are hardly the sort of people who built civilisation.  Quite the opposite.  They are the same people advocating for the Muslimification of the West and the imposition of Medical Nazism.  These people are as far removed from being intelligent, as Muhammadanism is from peace.

 

The myth of the Moderate Muslim

Rewrite the Koran, reform Islamic theology, separate church from state.....

Bookmark and Share

 

Keeping up with Muslim New-speak is very difficult. Muslims are masters at propaganda – with the Saudi's the master black magicians of the art of deception.  Iranian propaganda money also saturates Western institutions.  Every event or conflict involving the followers of the male Meccan moon deity and Mohammedanism is recast by the Muslims as a struggle between 'faith' and bigotry, [Islam and Western civilization]; 'enlightenment' and ignorance; or cultural freedom and oppression [Muslims vs. The Rest]. In Western society the ability of Muslims to use New-speak is astounding. What is insane is the acceptance of such nonsense by academia, politicians and the fake news media.

 

Muslim newspeak in North America and Europe is controlled by various Muslim groups who purport to speak for millions of Muslims resident in the West.  Examples are CAIR, ISNA or the MSA.  These groups are largely funded by the Saudis, Iranians or terror organisations. FBI and other investigations reveal that the linkages between 'moderate' Muslim groups and Islamo-fascist and radical organisations are legion and deep.

 

Western domiciled Muslims constantly whine about being 'targets' of 'white' 'racism.  The Muhammadan cult is of course, not a ‘race’ so racism cannot be the issue when discussing the cult itself, composed as it is of Arabs, Indians, Blacks, Whites and Asians. Islam as a movement, is a clearly a political-ideology of power and control. Any cursory reading of Islamic history and the Koran would dispel the notion that Islam is a faith.

 

Typical Moslem justifications for any act of Islamic terror would include the following Newspeak dupes:

 

-Not all Muslims are terrorists

-Islam is 'reacting' against Western aggression

-Muslims are largely peaceful and charitable

-Most Muslims are 'moderate'

-This was due to mental illness or misunderstanding Mein Koran

-Drugs and alcohol were involved

-‘Racism’ prompted this violent action

-This is an 'isolated' case

-'They' are not real Muslims

-The welfare state is insufficiently generous and solicitous of Muslims and this creates aggravation and resentment

 

The same list could have been used to justify Hitlerism; Stalinism; and Chinese Maoist fascism, and dozens of other fascisms so coveted and caressed by leftists and multi-culturalists. Not all Shinto Japanese in 1941 were anti-Western or as extremist as the military junta. Nazis were comprised of peaceful teachers, scientists, soccer players, actors and businessmen who were not as 'extreme' as Goering or Hitler. Russian grandmothers in 1970 had little inclination to world domination or the overthrow of American democracy. Chinese entrepreneurs today, are probably uninterested in invading Taiwan, overturning US elections, or working with the US deep state to embed socialist-communism in the USA.  Ergo I would expect that most Muslims living in the West are not 'the same' as the 'radicals', evident and so active over 1400 years of Islamic imperialism and Jihad.

 

So what. It is the theology of the cult which matters. Not the individual. This is especially true if the individual does nothing to reform the cult, its documents, its rituals, and its expectations. Thus the singular 'moderate' Muslim who tells you what you want to hear, and appears pious, plays the piano, dresses well and appears civilized, is hardly important in the grand scheme of his cult. If he is not determined to rewrite the Koran, reform the Hadiths, open up Islam to inquiry and even ridicule, then he too is part of the problem.

 

Since 9-11 there have been 40.000 Muslim attacks across the world. Slavery still goes on, even within the West, in the sex trading for marriage of young girls. I know because I have met some of these victims.  Moslems, Arabs and Blacks own, today, right now, some 5-10 million Black slaves in Africa.  Hindu girls in their thousands in East India have disappeared, taken as prisoners by Muslim Bangladeshis, raped, and forced to join Islam [to produce male Ghazi or Muslim warriors]. Attacks and racism against Jews and Christians are weekly events across the world. Yet not one single Muslim demonstration by these vaunted moderates has taken place anywhere in the Western world since 9-11. Not a single one.

 

Yet we are assured, 'all' Muslims are 'moderates'. Muslims are establishing radicalized schools all across the Western world teaching pure Islamic doctrine, which is by itself anti-Western, racist and supremacist. The media and politicians describe these schools as 'moderate'. In Europe every large city has more than a dozen of them, many funded by both Saudi-Wahabbi money, and state money. Many have deep connections to various Islamic-fascist groups overseas. In fact, the number of Muslim organisations and schools with connections to 'radical' Islam within the West are now are almost too many to count. Thirty years ago, there was only a handful. Yes, there is a Moslem tide, an invasion, a takeover of Western urban areas.  London UK currently has 500 mosques, implying a total Muslim population of 2.5 million, in a city of 10 million.  30 years ago, the Muslim presence in London was minimal. 

 

There is no proof that 'moderate' Muslim groups exist and if they do, they are poor, under-funded, under-manned, and largely silenced. Blasphemy rules apply in Islam.  You cannot criticise Muhammad, Mein Koran or Islamic theology.  The penalty is death. 

 

Moderate Islam might be what the 'mass' of Muslims desire, but there is precious little proof that this 'mainstream' Islam wants anything else other than more power, more state funding; more mosques; more adherents and widespread Koranic practice embedded in Sharia Law. Nothing is more obviously a threat to Western civilisation than the imposition of a totalitarian creed premised on pre-7th century codes which are not even laws in the modern sense; designed to meld together, church and state. Nothing is moderate about such a construction.

 

The only moderate Muslim is one who will agree to rewrite the Koran, the Hadiths and open up Islam to inquiry, ridicule and reformation and separate the church from the state. That is the only definition of a moderate Muslim. Period.

 

 

Roger Scruton: Fools, Frauds and Firebrands. Destroying 'Leftist' Philosophers

Most of whom are Islamo-philiac idiots and ignoramuses.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

Conservative Philosopher (recently deceased), Roger Scruton was a former academic exiled from his land due to heretical thought crimes, which offended the Marxist-Globalist Academic-Propaganda Complex.  90% of academics are Marxist-Socialist (including those who support Green Nazism or non-science such as ‘warming’).  There is little free speech with academe, with most universities and most programs (many of them utterly useless); nothing more than propaganda mills for the rather illiterate and ignorant view of the Professing class.  They preach a form of immoral-spirit-less religiosity and dogma, devoid of morality or intelligence.

“Hence the distinction between science and ideology: my thought is science, yours is ideology; my thought is Marxist (since only Marxism penetrates the veil of ideology), yours is ‘idealist’; my thought is proletarian (Lukács), yours is bourgeois; my thought belongs to the ‘material conditions’ of production, and can be called ‘theoretical praxis’, your thought belongs to the false consciousness that arises like a cloud above the place where history is made. My thought is at work in the factory; yours is puffed from the chimney and dissolves into air.”

 

Scruton excoriated ‘Liberals’ (Socialists, Communists, Globalists, Relativists, Humanists, Positivists – they do come with many labels); for 60 years.  His crime was to live in rural England, living in the real world, connected to nature (small husbandry farm); eschewing Fake News (BBC, Sly etc); avoiding addictions (TV, Internet, Small screens); and deploying Christian faith and morality, as he regarded other philosophers and the world around him.  He was persona-non-grata for Quackademia, the Fake News, the ‘Leftist’ rent-a-mob, those who are perpetually outraged, and those addicts who know little about the real world, nature or even their own human minds, brains and bodies.

 

In Fools and Frauds he admits his thought crimes:

“My previous book was published at the height of Margaret Thatcher’s reign of terror, at a time when I was still teaching in a university, and known among British left-wing intellectuals as a prominent opponent of their cause, which was the cause of decent people everywhere. The book was therefore greeted with derision and outrage, reviewers falling over each other for the chance to spit on the corpse. Its publication was the beginning of the end for my university career, the reviewers raising serious doubts about my intellectual competence as well as my moral character. This sudden loss of status led to attacks on all my writings, whether or not they touched on politics.”

 

Today across the Western World, fascistic-terrorist groups such as Black Lives Matter (but not if you are the wrong kind of Black like say a Christian murdered by Moslems, or a Police officer killed by Blacks); Anti-fa, Extinction Rebellion, and various Moslem Jihadic groups (usually organised by the Moslem Brotherhood or ISIS); are using public violence, arson, terror and assaults to bring down the ‘structure’ of Western civilisation.  This is what many youth are taught at indoctrination schools (university).  To say that half-wits support these programs is only pointing out the obvious.  It is only an obvious and sad fact that most of Western youth are polluted with Marxist dogma, unable to think, act reasonably, work productively, understand history and reality, and recognise the colossal ignorance of their own immoral-double standards.

“Two attributes of the new order justify the pursuit of it: liberation and ‘social justice’. These correspond roughly to the liberty and equality advocated at the French Revolution, but only roughly. The liberation advocated by left-wing movements today does not mean simply freedom from political oppression or the right to go about one’s business undisturbed. It means emancipation from the ‘structures’…..Much of their literature (the Marxist prophets he exposes) is devoted to deconstructing such institutions as the family, the school, the law and the nation state through which the inheritance of Western civilization has been passed down to us.”

 

The philosophies and polices of the ‘Left’ always lead to fascistic totalitarianism usually headed by a Leader who like many of the academic panjandrums today, has never worked, does not have a family, and never participated in nature, or civil society.  It is all violence and destruction.  Atheist socialists such as Hitler, Mao, Lenin, Stalin, Pol Pot (who learned his Communism in Paris from French ‘thinkers’ such as Sartre); were all committed Statists, in which various forms of statism (Communism, Fascism), would completely control society, the individual would melt into a collective and nothing would lie outside the state. 

 

None of these ‘Leftists’ had worked, engaged in normal family development, nor had any time for religious faith or spiritual development.  All of them were hard-core Evolutionary-dialectical materialists. The atheist Mussolini, who did have a job as a newspaper editor for a number of years but was largely outside of ‘normal life’ as most of us would understand it, pithily described the program, now promoted by the ‘New Left’, an Atheist movement in which ‘everything is in the state’.  

 

So it is with the Atheistic ‘New Left’.  Violent, intolerant, full of Newspeak, full of hate, anger, and racism (against Whites).

“Marx’s ‘materialist’ theory of history was a response to Hegel, who had seen the evolution of human societies as driven by the consciousness of their members, as this is expressed in religion, morality, law and culture. Not so, Marx famously wrote. It is ‘not consciousness that determines life, but life that determines consciousness’ (The German Ideology). Life is not a conscious process occurring in the realm of ideas, but a ‘material’ reality, rooted in the needs of the organism. And the basis of social life is likewise material, involving the production, distribution and exchange of goods. Economic activity is the ‘base’ on which the ‘superstructure’ of society rests.”

 

Marx’s theories are incredibly mindless and devoid of reality.  Individuals, institutions, cultures, history, legacies, technology, markets, decisions, families, Churches, none of these exist, except to server the ‘materialist’ phase which abstractly controls all human organisation.  These ‘intellectuals’, including Freud, Marcuse, Hobsbawm, Derrida, Foucault, Galbraith, and a long list of other psychologically ill, morally compromised and mentally constrained philosophers, simply ignore real life.

“language, religion, custom, association and traditions of political order – in short, all those forces that absorb competing individuals into the shared identity of a nation. To identify the working class as an agent, even if ‘metaphorically’, is to ignore the true significance of national consciousness as a genuine agent of change.”

 

And in condemning their old enemy ‘bourgeois-capitalism’ run by Whites and Jews (racism mixed with envious stupidity), there is never a real analysis done about the benefits of a system of markets, institutions, laws and free-association, only a limp hatred about the ‘structure’ which provides such flaccid humans the ability to not work, engage in mindless philosophy, or adjure their ‘proletariat’ to violence and war.

“no statistics, no detailed analysis of the modern firm or its specific instances, no examination of the structure of decision making, no real comparison between the private corporation and the state monopoly and no theory of the legal personality of the corporations in a modern state. We are offered nothing more than social psychology...”

 

Scruton eviscerates many of the modern world’s ‘philosophers’.  He simply repeats what they write, showing the gibberish, illogic, the tautological statements, the circular reasoning and the abdication of thought, reason and morality in their pronouncement’s to their flock of eager half-wits, that the long pages of jargon and nothing, really mean something important, namely; the destruction of the Western state is a mission worth dying for.  An Austrian Baron ‘Lukacs’, often cited by the New Left as a great thinker, is an example.

“He might have noticed his own hatred of God, his refusal of trust, humility and atonement, and his overweening violence towards the created world. But he would have noticed, too, how much his ‘messianic sectarianism’ remained wedded to the deed of Sarajevo, how much the annihilating labels – ‘ideologist’, ‘nihilist’, ‘reactionary’, ‘nostalgist’ – which he threw so indiscriminately at the imaginary enemy might have been rightly attached to himself, and how much he remained to the last what he was in the beginning, a privileged remnant of a vanished ruling class.”

 

The arrogance, the ego, the ignorance of misplaced pride, the labelling of ordinary people as categories of problems, the lack of analysis or understanding.  All from yet another ‘thinker’ who never worked, never lived in reality, was disconnected from nature, humans and normal associations.

“By constantly notching up the critique of American capitalism and its culture, and making only muted or dismissive references to the real nightmare of communism, those thinkers showed their profound indifference to human suffering and the unserious nature of their prescriptions.”

 

‘New Left’ (Globalism, Internationalism, Socialism, Communism) is a religion without spirituality.  There are no ethics, morals, regulations rooted in respect for others, or for private property, individual effort, or for history, culture, and the accumulation of civilisation over 3000 years.

 

Scruton’s books are a panacea for the age of stupid, for an era of anti-White racism, ignorance about the Moslem project, the deification of Fake News and Science Fiction.  Most of the nonsense one hears can be traced back to the ‘Thinkers’ Scruton so ably destroys.