Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.
3 Moslems were arrested for attempting to blow up the Rialto Bridge in Venice. Another week in the EUtopia; and another Moslem Jihadist attack or plot. Quel Surpris. This event won’t be reported by the Fake News MSM. Nor will it be picked up by the usual poseurs and really clever people.
“With all the unbelievers there are in Venice, you put a bomb under the Rialto and you go straight to heaven,” one of the alleged jihadist plotters said in a wiretapped conversation, said Adelchi d’Ippolito, the Venice prosecutor in charge of the case.
Of course, plotting to kill ‘unbelievers’ means that this has Nothing To Do With Islam – NTDWI.
If such events are mentioned the Left/Communist/Cultural Marxist talking points come out. Pre-emptively one can summarize the usual response from the big brains:
Pope Frank: ‘These are migrants, who like Jesus, are searching for love and hope.’
Fake News MSM: ‘They are Christian, and are Italian citizens with deep tans, named Luigi, Alfredo, Giuseppe’.
Politicians: ‘Islamophobia caused this’.
NGOs backed by Soros money: ‘Racism is the root cause of this provoked plot’.
Green Tards: ‘This proves Globaloneywarming causes Jihad’.
Empress Hussein Obama: ‘Islam is peace and therefore Moslems cannot be involved’.
Psych Professor: ‘They suffered from mental illness’.
University students; ‘Don’t fall into the right wing trap and blame the great ‘religion’ of Islam’.
That covers most of the talking points.....
For the brain dead, the Muhammadan cult is peace, love and tolerance. When Moslems engage in their weekly Jihadic activity somewhere in the West, the MSM, elite and politicians studiously ignore it, terming it ‘Islamist’, or the outbreak of mental illness and actions from the lone-wolf union membership. Moslems become ‘Asians’, youth, ‘migrants’, or ‘immigrants’. Their actions are never associated with the moon cult of Mecca [Baal is AL Lah, and Muhammad’s family were the caretakers of the Baal shrine].
The paedophile Muhammad, who had sex with a 9-year-old [to consummate an alliance with his most important general Abu Bakr, through his daughter Aisha]; and a man who slaughtered Arab pagans, Jews, and Christians; and who plundered these communities to enrich himself; is portrayed as a ‘prophet’ of peace, liberating women, enfranchising the poor, instituting moral standards and revivifying faith. A ‘great man’ of a ‘great faith’, say Pope Frank, Prime Minister May, ex-Communist propaganda minister for youth and now Chancellor Merkel; and the other huge brains of the political scene. Ascribing to this fuehrer figure such deeds goes beyond absurd – it is psychotic, mentally deranged, psychosomatically ill. If such a man created a cult – why is it religious and why would it devotees behave any better ?
According to really smart people, only ‘fundamentalist’ [ie. ‘fascist’] Jews and Christians oppose the Muhammdan moon cult. This is of course, a lie. Socialists, Atheists and other worthies have also recognized the totalitarian barbarism of Muhammadan fascism. One of the more famous recently is Oriana Fallaci, Italy’s best known socialist journalist and author. Communism would probably describe rather succinctly, her ideas of the political-economy. But unlike Merkel et al, she views Islam for what it is:
‘She vividly describes how Muslim migrants would urinate and defecate on artistic treasures in Florence, including the celebrated bronze doors at the Baptistery – the “Gates of Heaven” by Lorenzo Ghiberti. Right after 9/11, Fallaci wrote a furious article about the behavior of Muslims in the West; it took up four full pages in the Corriere della Sera; she then turned it into a book, The Rage and the Pride, a full-bore attack on Islam and Muslims that does not mince words, and that has sold millions of copies.’
Moslems urinating, defecating and defacing Christian symbols is nothing new. It is demanded in Mein Koran. All idols – pace Muhammad who smashed 359 idols of the Kabbah shrine, save that of Baal – must be destroyed. Failing that a pious Moslem must desecrate them. Fallaci of course criticized Islam for its sex slavery, misogyny, its hypocrisy, its wanton violence, its inimitable barbarism. For that she was sued by ‘human rights courts’ in Europe and her life threatened by Moslems.
Atheists such as David Hume, in an age when clarity was not an issue also detested Islam. Hume read Mein Koran and was instantly repelled – as any person with a brain would be:
Let us attend to his narration; and we shall soon find, that he bestows praise on such instances of treachery, inhumanity, cruelty, revenge, bigotry, as are utterly incompatible with civilized society. No steady rule of right seems there to be attended to; and every action is blamed or praised, so far only as it is beneficial or hurtful to the true believers.
Mark Twain was an Atheist, anti-Christian and a man who would now be termed a left-liberal. He had no illusions about Mein Koran:
When I, a thoughtful and unblessed Presbyterian, examine the Koran, I know that beyond any question every Mohammedan is insane; not in all things, but in religious matters.
George Bernard Shaw another Communist-Atheist, who apologized for the fascism of Stalin, found Islam the most disturbing ‘faith’ imaginable. At least he understood it has nothing to do with Christianity:
Islam is very different [from Christianity], being ferociously intolerant. ..When the Arabs had run this sort of idolatry to such extremes [that] they did this without black dolls and worshipped any stone that looked funny, Mahomet rose up at the risk of his life and insulted the stones shockingly, declaring that there is only one God, Allah, the glorious, the great… And there was to be no nonsense about toleration.
And then there is the atheist Bertrand Russell who wrote comparing the Fascism of Communism quite favourably with Islam:
Among religions, Bolshevism is to be reckoned with Mohammedanism rather than with Christianity and Buddhism. Christianity and Buddhism are primarily personal religions, with mystical doctrines and a love of contemplation. Mohammedanism and Bolshevism are practical, social, unspiritual, concerned to win the empire of the world.
Immediately after his [Muhammed’s] death the conquests began, and they proceeded with rapidity… Westward expansion (except in Sicily and Southern Italy) was brought to a standstill by the defeat of the Mohammedans at the battle of Tours in 732, just one hundred years after the death of the Prophet… It was the duty of the faithful to conquer as much of the world as possible for Islam… The first conquests of the Arabs began as mere raids for plunder, and only turned into permanent occupation after experience has shown the weakness of the enemy… The Arabs, although they conquered a great part of the world in the name of a new religion were not a very religious race; the motive of their conquests was plunder and wealth rather than religion.
None of Russell’s analysis can be gainsaid or debated. Islam is a totalitarian construct which destroys. It does not civilize. It adds no value. It is a cult of sex slavery, violence, death and war.
Brilliant and precise article on the base fact that Islam plunders, squats, pillages, and destroys. It does not assimilate, enliven, or empower. Bronze age celestial inspired pagan cults like Islam, are by nature, forces of death and destruction. This Al Lah is Baal and for the globalist-cultural Marxist elite, resplendent in their ignorance, they need to read about the death cult of Baal, embedded in corrupt paganism within the Canaanites, Hittites and other Near Eastern regimes and tribes. One of the reasons for the attraction of Hebraism was the sheer savagery, brutality, and lusts of the Baal cults.
….Belhaj, who has authored four books and had more than fifty studies published in international publications, cautioned that as a result of the globalist system, “sustained poverty … is going to be the fate of a considerable portion of people in the West'