French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  

Back

In the West - Recent Articles

20 years after 9-11. What have we learned?

Some people have woken up. But the elite are as ignorant and treachorous as ever.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

This follows on from a blog 10 years ago, on 9-11 which asked ‘what did we learn 10 years after that fateful declaration of war on ‘liberal’ democratic societies’, which thanks to the Corona fascism are now illiberal, undemocratic and probably not as free as some areas under Taliban control.  Twenty years after 9-11, the USA is run by a despotic Communist dictatorship, in the persona of a man who has been stupid and criminally corrupt his whole life.  Who would have thought that 20 years post 9-11, the Muslims or ‘terrorists’ would have seen the US morph into a totalitarian repression?

 

20 years on and what exactly have we remembered and learned from the unprovoked Muslim attack, coordinated by Al Qaeda or the base, and which heralded a 20 year war in Afghanistan and Iraq ?

 

According to the Muslimified Prime Minister of Canada, the real concern is the impact 9-11 had on Muslims.  He starkly and darkly chides Canadians for Islamophobia, or wrong think.  His Immigration Minister – a female Muslim who criminally lied on her refugee status and reason to emigrate to Canada which should have resulted in her deportation– calls the Taliban ‘brothers’.  Muslims who dominate many national legislatures evoke the same philosophies and biases.  These two expressions of solidarity with the ‘minority Muslim’ are hardly novel, and they are in fact for most Western governments and those useless creatures called politicians and civil servants, standard beliefs and policies. 

 

20 years after 9-11 and the Muslim diaspora has accelerated.  15 million or more entered the EU and UK from 2011-2021.  In the UK alone some 400.000 Muslims arrive every year to settle.  The large northern English cities of Manchester, Leeds, Sheffield and Bradford are in many locales, Muslim dominated.  Imams openly preach that they the Muslim umma, will conquer north England.  They can add Londonistan to the list.  East London is largely Muslim and Indian.  It is about as English as Lahore.  From London the Muslim diaspora, arriving in waves every year, spreads itself out to the hinterland.  There is not one English community of any size, within a 2-hour drive of London, that does not have a noticeable Muslim presence.  And more illegal Muslims and Africans arrive on the coasts of Sussex and Kent, eagerly welcomed as ‘refugees’ by the media, the Church and the anti-English self-loathing racists who deplore Christians and Whites.  50.000 will make landfall this year and bring over 200.000 of their families and friends, since not one has been deported during the tenure of the Corona King Boris and his Hindu-Ugandan born Home Secretary responsible for such matters.

 

The UK is not unique in its love of Muslim immigrants.  TV adverts the world over depict Blacks and Muslims as the superiors of the hated Whites, hair flowing, white teeth, athletic, or studious and severe behind eye glasses whilst discovering something in a lab, or programming some code into their iMac, with their White girlfriend close to hand.  The EU has allowed more than 10 million Muslims to enter unvetted since 2011 with hundreds of Jihad attacks ranging from the enormous to the small.  Notre Dame was no accident.  Now millions from Afghanistan will enter the EU, to be dispersed to the provinces of Greater Germany, with governments demanding that the ‘racist, phobic’ locals, do their utmost to welcome in the ‘refugees’ who will enrich them by not working, committing rapes and crime and calling for Sharia barbarism.  90% of Muslim immigrants are unemployed in Sweden.  The same numbers can be found all over Europe.  If the Muslims don’t physically conquer Europe, they will certainly bankrupt it.

 

20 years after 9-11 and what have we learned?

 

The media still won’t discuss the real ‘root cause’ of 9-11.  Islam has 1400 years of barbaric war with ‘bloody borders’ and its keystone document is more Christophobic than Judeophobic.  Western civilisation and certainly what is left of the liberal-doddering Churches is the enemy and always has been.  Devout Moslems truly believe that the Babylonian moon deity Hub'Allah, or the Al-Lah, has chosen them to rule the earth in his or its name, through the 'great man' Muhammad, the most important law-giver in human history. At times fictional insanity cannot match factual reality.

 

20 years later on and what have we learned?

According to the media and most academics it is just 'Islamists' were are fighting, as if one group of backwards vicious Moslems got the whole idea of Muhammad's enterprise wrong. Sometimes the Islamists are called militants, terrorists, or disaffected youth. They are never connected to Moslem theology. 10.000 dead a year world-wide from Moslem attacks and over 40.000 attacks since 9-11, and yet the big brains cannot connect Islam with Moslems with violent death-loving Jihad.

 

20 years later on and what have we learned?

Few know that the cult of Muhammad is both racist and supremacist.  The Koran calls for the eradication of Jews, Christians and non-Muslims.  Not many know this. Blacks are regarded as inferior and to be enslaved, unless they convert to the moon cult.  Today in Africa Muslims own an estimated 5 million Black slaves, but no one is asking them to bend knees at sport matches.  In Nigeria Muslims slaughter 5.000 Christians a year.  No one is asking them to bend knees to Christians and ask forgiveness.  The cult of Muhammad is just another expression of totalitarianism, but few know this.  It is portrayed by Western fake news and hacks as a minority, under duress and repressed.  There are more Muslims in the world now than Catholics. 

 

20 years later on and what have we learned?

The poverty of Arab and Moslem states is blamed on the West, 'capitalism' [which is non-existent in its pure form], trade and globalisation. The Jews in tiny Israel, surrounded by 300 million hostile Moslems are singled out as the 'root cause' of massive Moslem terror, jihad and societal poverty. Arabs squatting in former Jewish territory [see 980 BC] are now called Palestinians and survive on both international welfare and Jewish aid. Their stated goal is another holocaust. Hamas and Hizbollah are feted as freedom-fighting organizations, deeply devoted to harmony and multi-culturalism.

 

20 years later on and what have we learned?

As with the Rona Fascism, we have learned that people will believe anything if told by ‘experts’ and the Fake News.  20 years later on and it seems we have not learned that much about Islam, the Koran, the history of Muhammad, the imperialist spread of jihadic Muhammadanism, the 300 million dead over 1400 years, and the 10.000 killed annually in the new century by oil-funded Moslem depredation. Moslems in Turkey and elsewhere openly proclaim the intention of a new Caliphate. Moslems in India brag about wiping out the Hindus – after raping and converting their women. Jews are targeted for another holocaust. Iran readies a nuclear weapon. 5th column groups are busy in the US and Europe, usually with taxpayer money, in devising various means to bring down their host governments. There has not been one single Moslem demonstration anywhere in the Western world, ever, against Moslem racism, supremacism, Jew-hate, female mutilation, dis-honor killings, jihad attacks, and intolerance. Not one. And that includes the days following 9-11.

 

20 years later on and what have we learned?

In our culture, in our cities, in our immigration systems, in our schools, in our politics - not a hell of a lot.

 

Henri Pirenne: Mohammed and Charlemagne. A thesis which offends modern ahistorical revisionism.

The 'academic' animus against Christianity does not render history or truth.

Bookmark and Share

 

Pirenne was an early 20th century Belgian historian whose works include a History of Europe.  An academic of renown and importance, he was interred as a prisoner of war during World War I in Germany.  During his time in captivity, he worked on his History of Europe continuing a work of historical art which spanned 35 years.  From this effort  one of the most important histories of the 20th century, ‘Mohammed and Charlemagne’ was born.  It offends almost all of ‘academia’ today, so by default it is likely to be entirely correct.  You can hardly read a kind word about Pirenne in modern day ahistorical revisionism, much of anti-Christian, in modern ‘academia’.  Pirenne’s ideas conform to common sense, which deeply antagonises the ‘academies’ and Muslimophiles which saturate modern day universities and institutes, many of them happy recipients of Muslim organisational money and donations.  Pirenne’s thesis, based on records, artefacts, trade data and coinage is that the Muslim irruption in the 7th century, combined with Viking attacks in the following centuries (much of it generated by the White slave trade with Muslims); contracted the European socio-economic landscape leading to eras of great, violent and turbulent change and at times contraction, followed by innovation and improvement.  No knees are bent by Muslims or ancestors of Vikings for the millions of White slaves taken between 640 AD and 1000 AD. 

 

According to modern ‘and the 'orthodox' theory of historical development parlayed by the great minds at Western universities and research centres, the Muslims were far more advanced than the cowering, dirty midgets of Europe circa 640 AD. Only Muslim enlightenment saved Europe from a permanent Dark Age. The Muslims were not only responsible with saving Greek and Roman literature, culture and societal innovations, but imparted these onto the backward Europeans through such venues as the Muslim city of Cordoba in Spain, or the interaction of Muslims in Baghdad with the theocratic and darkly superstitious Christian fanatics in Constantinople. According to this 'accepted' view Islam was a force for good, transferring the ideas of civilization from the East to the backwards West and ensuring that Europeans did not revert back to Cro-Magnon times. We should all be thankful then for the advance of Islam.

 

This modern view of the early Christian medieval period is significant in its mendacity and loathing of Christianity.  Even Bernard Lewis the so-named 'Sage of the West' in ‘On the West and Islam’, forwards the illusion that the Muslims were advanced and the Christians in Europe and North Africa backwards. Reality and archaeological evidence, as forwarded by Pirenne make this theory a laughingstock. The Fall of Rome as most serious students of the subject will know, was a benefit for much of Europe. Long before 476 AD Rome had ceased to be of much use. It had become just another oriental despotism, with high taxes, a far ranging and corrupt bureaucracy and endless civil and internecine warfare which destroyed wealth and the lives of generations. By 476 AD Rome was already managed by Germanic chieftains and the ending of the reign of the last Emperor Romulus, by the Teutonic Chief of Staff Odoacer – done at the behest of the Eastern Empire – was not a crash heard round the world, but a mere formality in which the Germans formally took over the empire they had so long dominated.  Christian Europe fused together Roman, Greek and Christian ideals to deal with the end of Empire, the change of ownership and the withdrawal of debased Roman coinage from its European wide military occupation, in which the army was a significant attraction of investment and trade.  It was not an easy transition, but without the Church, Europe would have indeed been splintered far worse, and far deeper, and would have succumbed in-toto, to the Muslim invasion of the 7th century.  It would have become Islamic, an idea that undoubtedly sends modern ‘historians’ into epileptic fits of visionary delight.

 

In over 150 well sourced and detailed pages Pirenne’s elucidates his case that the Arab attacks on Europe including their takeover of Sicily, Spain by 650 AD, and the relentless piracy and littoral invasions which lasted from 650 to about 950 AD was responsible for the demise of what was then a vibrant set of civilizations [when the Spanish Reconquista really got underway though the Spanish Christians did stop the complete takeover of Spain with their victory at Covadonga in 720 AD].

 

The 3 'lost centuries' were basically a dark age caused by the siege of Europe initiated by the Muslims. We know this to be true because the Eastern Roman empire of Byzantium suffered a similar fate. The Byzantine empire became a lot poorer, less educated and suffered economic and population contraction during the exact same period as the 'Dark Ages' took hold in the West.  Byzantium contracted until the 10th century, when through an economic and related military renewal, it fought back against the Muslims from the south and east, and the pagans from the north, and entered a period of nominal prosperity, until its armies were shattered in 1071 by the Seljuk Muslims at Manzikert.  Byzantium never fully recovered from this defeat and was consumed by the Ottoman Turks in steps until the great city and last remaining outpost was digested in 1453. 

 

Pirenne's archaeological proof makes another key point. Post 476 AD the former Roman state in Gaul, Spain, Italy and North Africa flourished. The Gallo-Roman elite essentially carried on the Roman empire's institutions, trade, road building, colossi construction, and culture. Nothing changed. In fact, as Pirenne proves, the new states became wealthier. Without the dead hand of the Roman-Oriental state, the new powers were able to increase trade, reduce taxes and improve productivity. Archeological evidence makes it clear that from 500-650 AD the former Western empire was far wealthier, more integrated, and more cultured than at any time in its history. The Gallic dynasty of the Merovingians for example, were literally covering their public buildings in part with silver, gold and gaudy emblems of wealth. Western Europe was no poor backwater when the Arabs invaded the European-Gallo Vandal empire of western North Africa in 635 AD. It was rich, sophisticated, and elaborate.

 

Real world facts make this obvious.

 

Why then did Europe decline from 650 to about 950 AD? The main reason is the most obvious. The Arab conquests sealed off the Mediterranean Sea and cut North Africa off from Europe. Eastern trade so vital to the wealth of Europe and so necessary for its intellectual, material and even cultural development was severed. So too was papyrus. For 1000 years the Egyptian supply of paper was an extraordinarily key aspect of Euro-Romano development. When this supply was ended circa 640 AD, the Europeans had to turn to the inferior use of cowhides or parchment. This made writing, record keeping and literacy far more difficult to sustain.

 

The Arabs and Muslims far from being peaceful, civilized and nuanced progressives – as forwarded by Lewis and the orthodox academic community – engaged in a 400-year concerted attack upon the European coastal areas. After conquering Spain and Sicily the Arabs tried to conquer France [failing in 732 AD at the Battle of Tours], and engaged in endless littoral piracy, literally annihilating Christian shipping and port activity. Many European ports became emptied first of ships, then of goods and people. As trade declined the entire economy suffered. Even the coinage of money became difficult, and gold and silver coins were replaced by cheaper bronze units.

 

When the Christians ended the Muslim siege starting in about the mid-10th century their economy, wealth and spirits recovered. It led directly to the aid of the Eastern Empire and the creation of the Crusades. After 400 years of Arab aggression the Christians had recovered enough strength to counterattack and end Islamic hegemony of the crucial Mediterranean sea.

 

These are common sensical, black and white facts, supported by archaeology, contemporary accounts, and comprehensive research. Pirenne is entirely right. The 'Fall of Rome' was not a catastrophe but in many ways a positive development. Europe went into a 3-century decline thanks to the Arabs. This, however, offends the current zeitgeist that the Arabs and Muslims created the modern world. This fallacy is deep rooted in Western culture and academia. The reality is that the Arabs and Muslims created and still create destruction, death and anti-civilizational practices and attitudes.

 

This is why Pirenne is condemned by the modern historian-community. He was right. They are wrong. And the little academic minds will unite to crucify those who dare to speak the truth.  Not much has changed since the days of Ptolemy.

Denying the Muslim Umma’s goal to rule the Globe is suicidal, not tolerant.

Islamophobia is not the problem. We need more, not less of it.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

Cultural Marxists, a category whose members include most of the political elite, academia and the media, often descry and rage with populist affectation against 'Islamophobia'. Cultural Marxists moralize that being offended by a pagan Arab fascism, one dedicated to submitting the individual into a collective communal in which the church and state are permanently commingled, is somehow an act of irrationality, almost racist in its scope, and unsophisticated in its approach. As with all matters to do with Cultural Marxism the opposite is of course true. What the vendors of cultural destruction are trying to sell you is the inversion of reality.

 

'Islamophobia' is another juvenile mindless label. We need more Islamophobes not less. We need more people who are educated about the real Islam, and the real nature of 'Jihad', not less. We need more realism in identifying the pagan fascist reality of a political theology centred around the racist Koran, founded by an Arab military adventurer who went mad at age 40, deifying the male moon deity of Mecca. Can there be anything more absurd than stating that a program of mindless ritualization, prayer, prostration, irrationality, and following laws emanating from a book which is worse than Mein Kampf, is a religion? Cultural Marxists are ignorant. It is plainly insipid to criticize someone who understands and resists the evils of Islam.

 

As with most destructive cultural changes and posturing, the Marxist uses slander, accusing those who defend traditions, Western superiority, or the modern world with calumnies and distortions.  The cultural Marxist cults abound and are intent at dismantling Western civilisation.

§  Abortion, which is simply the killing of a human, turned into a 'female right to choose'. How kind.

§  Globaloney Warming fearmongering is now defined as a 'science'.

§  Trans-Queer coupling and culture is now decanted as normal, even superior, in spite of psychological evidence, treatment and studies to the contrary.

§  White Misandry or hatred of Whites, premised on ‘slavery’, is promoted as mandatory ignoring White slavery by Black, Arab, Turkish and Mongolian Muslims numbering at least 25 million and the fact that only White Christians have fought wars to end slavery (no other culture or race in history has done this and Blacks and Muslims still own today, 5 million Black African slaves).

§  Defaming Christianity and inventing lies about the theology which formed the modern world is repurposed as being progressive and 'secular'.

§  Slandering capitalism and industry is now 'defending the poor and the minorities'.

§  Those who protest against illegal immigration which destroys native White societies, culture and heritage, are racists, against all immigration and in need of re-education.

§  If you object to stabbing people with experimental drugs to counter a 0.3% death rate flu, you are anti-science, a risk, a domestic terrorist and should be denied access to a normal life.

 

Islamophobia is thus a word like ‘racism’, which the Cultural Marxists will use to beat down anyone who opposes a fascist pagan moon cult from Mecca, responsible for some 300 million dead over 1400 years and the conquering via the sword, which still goes on today, of huge tracts of the planet. So how intelligent are these Cultural Marxists?

 

Anyone who uses Islamophobia is plainly a simpleton.

 

First, most of the people against the theocratic fascism called 'submission', are not against individual Muslims. We know from Nazi records that only 2 million Germans were part of the official Nazi party. In Russia, the Communist party numbered no more than 8 million. This would indicate that superficially at least, most Germans and most Russians were not deployed inside non-Western organizations dedicated to the destruction of the modern world. Most likely, most citizens of Nazi Germany were not interested in Germanic race theory, nor in universalist ambition and supremacy. Same for the Russians of the Cold War. But that is immaterial. The cults which ruled these states, and their liturgy, philosophies, ideals and beliefs, certainly were interested in universal rule, and destroying the reality of the 5 senses. Islam is no different.

 

Second, no one knows if the individual Muslim is a great and good person, or someone sending money to Hamas and reading Qutb. You don't know. And if you don't know, it is highly specious to be lecturing people that all Muslims are moderate peace-loving democrats. Reality and facts are against you. The Saudi's have spent some $100 billion in the past 40 years promoting Salafist-Islamic fascism around the world. Huge mosques have been and will continue to be erected in every major Western city and urban area. The Koran does not preach love and hope, but intolerance, conquest and war. Read it.

 

Cultural Marxists loathe Christianity. But they esteem and love Islam. Why is that? How can someone debauch aspects of Christianity, which bequeathed the Golden Rule, the Book of Matthew, higher ethics, peace as a virtue, immanent universal generalist love, and which amongst other higher callings helped end slavery a practice still on-going within Islam, sanctioned by the Koran? How can any person who is sane and who can see reality possibly have an animus against the Christian philosophy of faith through reason, but support an irrational, illiterate and supremacist liturgy like Islam? You must be dumb.

 

And as the cult of Corona has revealed, at least half of society is brain-dead.

 

Muslim Brotherhood documents discovered in the 1990s are very clear. The Muslim elite, or a cadre within it, certainly desires the replacing of the European and North American systems of government and freedom, with Caliphate rule, based on 7th century premised Sharia barbarism. Pagan Fascisms, as expressed in the cult of Muhammad and his followers, are not known to be progenitors of tolerance, rationality, freedom, or to facilitate a division of church and state - supposedly a very important concern for the Cultural Marxist Brown Shirts.

 

We can be sure of one thing of course. As with Gender fascism, Abortion, Globaloney-Warming, Socialism, and state control, the Cultural Marxists and their media friends will try to change the nature of the debate from what Islam is, to one of name-calling. If you oppose Globaloney Warming, you are a holocaust denier. If you think Abortion is bad, you hate women. If you oppose unfettered illegal immigration you are a racist.....and if you fight against an Arabian moon cult and fascist theocracy, you are an 'Islamophobe'!  Denying reality is what Cultural Marxists do.