French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  


Mohammed - Recent Articles

St. Thomas Aquinas on the ignorance of Muhammadism & Muhammadans

Islamophilia is a mental disease.

Bookmark and Share

The Middle Ages were not ‘dark’.  Today’s culture is rather dark indeed with the various cults people belong to.  Panspermia; Dark Matter; Pregnant Black Holes; Globaloneywarming; Plant-food-is-evil; ‘Science’ [fiction]; Islam is Peace; Open Borders; Historical Revisionism; Abortion….the list is quite endless.  Regarding the hysterical modern cult of ‘Islam is Peace’ the philosophers of the Middle Ages [called ‘scientists’ today]; were under no illusions about Muhammadism, which is what Islam or Submission needs to be called.  Muhammadism is the cult of Muhammad and a cult it is.

One Middle Age scientist [or philosopher] was St. Thomas Aquinas, one of the brightest men that Western Civilisation has developed.  Living in the 13th century, and through the last phases of the Crusades, Acquinas offered a biting critique of Islam based in large part on the questionable character and methods of its founder, Mohammed.

Aquinas and indeed anyone who has bothered to study Muhammadism, will know that this cult appealed to ignorant, brutish, carnal men and it was spread not by the power of its arguments or divine grace but only by blood and the power of the sword.  Muhammadism, like Nazism or Communism, is a coercive cult; one that must propitiate the Baal idol [or Al Lah, the Lord of Mecca], with blood offerings.  This propitiation with blood to appease the moon deity long precedes Muhammadism of course and was a central pillar of the Baal cults of the Near East, of which the Meccan was just one.  Muhammad’s family were of course the caretakers of the Baal or Al Lah shrine.

Aquinas knew this.  Being a keen observer of the human condition, he was also familiar with the chief works of the Muslim philosophers of his day including Avicenna, Algazel, and Averroes–and engaged them in his writings.  He found them wanting.  Unlike the claims by the modern cult of Islamophilia, Moslem ‘science’ produced very little.  Most ‘inventions’ ascribed to Moslems were converts or those living in Moslem domains.  Most of the creations pre-date Moslem conquests.  Acquinas knew this and was able to quite easily dissect Muhammadism both theologically and practically.

In his voluminous Summa contra gentiles, or Summary against non Christians, which Aquinas wrote between 1258 and 1264 AD, the genius argued for the truth of Christianity against other belief systems, including Muhammadism.  Looking at the poverty of Muhammad’s cult, this claim is not difficult to make. 

Aquinas for example contrasted the spread of Christianity with that of Islam, arguing that much of Christianity’s early success stemmed from widespread belief in the miracles of Jesus, whereas the spread of Islam was worked through the promise of sensual pleasures and the violence of the sword.  Muhammadism appealed to the deranged, venal, lying, bloody, material, violent and sexual.  Christianity to their opposites.

Mohammad, Aquinas wrote, “seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh goads us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure.”

Such an offer, Aquinas contended, appealed to a certain type of person of limited virtue and wisdom.

“In all this, as is not unexpected, he was obeyed by carnal men,” he wrote. “As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity.”

Because of the weakness of Muhammadism’s contentions, Aquinas argued, “no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning.” Instead, those who believed in him “were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Muhammad forced others to become his followers by the violence of his arms.”

Muhammadism’s violent methods of propagation were especially unconvincing to Aquinas, since he found that the use of such force does not prove the truth of one’s claims, and are the means typically used by evil men.

“Mohammad said that he was sent in the power of his arms,” Aquinas wrote, “which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants.”

At the time Aquinas was writing, Islam was generally considered a Christian heresy, since it drew so heavily on Christian texts and beliefs. Aquinas wrote that Mohammed “perverts almost all the testimonies of the Old and New Testaments by making them into fabrications of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law.”

According to the noted historian Hilaire Belloc, Muhammadism, “began as a heresy, not as a new religion. It was not a pagan contrast with the Church; it was not an alien enemy. It was a perversion of Christian doctrine. Its vitality and endurance soon gave it the appearance of a new religion, but those who were contemporary with its rise saw it for what it was—not a denial, but an adaptation and a misuse, of the Christian thing.”

In his Summa contra gentiles, Aquinas ends his argument by stating the obvious that Muhammed, had to keep his followers ignorant in order for them to remain faithful. It was, Aquinas wrote, “a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity.”

“It is thus clear that those who place any faith in his words believe foolishly,” he wrote.

Aquinas is of course correct.  Muhammad himself was largely ignorant, a war lord, a man who had 24 sex slaves and wives, who had sex with a 9-year-old, who murdered started wars and brutalized populations.  For clever people, this makes him a ‘prophet’ of peace. 

Where are Muhammad's miracles ?

A Jihadist and sex addled Fuehrer cannot perform the immaterial.

Bookmark and Share

Muhammad is the anti-thesis of Jesus Christ, or in more prosaic terms the anti-Christ. Indeed Muhammad's family idol Baal, the Meccan moon deity, is depicted as a depraved cult of evil in the Old Testament. Mein Koran and Mein Muhammad basically teach the opposite of Christianity. Of that there is no doubt. If you have read Mein Koran, the history of Moslem Jihad, and the core texts of the Hadith and Sira, you know that Islam is in the main, anti-Christian, and offers the view of an anti-Christ, namely Muhammad.

One clear example out of a million one could mention in differentiating the fascistic death cult of Muhammad, which runs riot with anti-semiticism, misogyny, Christian-hate, violence, illiteracy, and Jihad; is that Muhammad did not, could not and would not, perform miracles. The list of miraculous episodes attributed to Christ are only hinted at in the New Testament. A full list is never given. As John stated, it would take too many scribes and too many books. Nevertheless there are about 2 dozen such miracles identified in the Bible, including raising 4 people from the dead, though no doubt many more were raised. The resurrection is the greatest miracle in history, attested to by Romans, Jews and modern Christian haters. No coherent set of facts or arguments exist to contravene the act of the risen Christ.

What of Muhammand and his miracles ?

First, Moslems tried to ascribe to Muhammad the known and accepted miracles of Christ. As usual Mein Islam poaching and plagiarizing from Jewish or Christian sources. Islamic expert Guillaume writes:

Whether the object of the inventors was to elevate their prophet to a position equal to that held by Jesus in the estimation of His servants, or whether it was to furnish themselves and their pupils with a messenger of God who satisfied a natural craving of the human heart for a visible manifestation of divine power it is not our purpose to determine....the works of Christ...and those of his apostles are freely drawn on and put into the mouth of Muhammad.”

Thus we have yet again Moslem deceit and fiction. Muhammad was a lustful, violent, brigand, who had no power to perform the miraculous because he did not possess any real faith. His cult of submission was simply a tool of control. Mein Koran contains no ethics whatsoever that are Catholic or Universal. Be nice to fellow Moslems. Kill or conquer the rest.

Dashti, the Iranian Moslem investigator comments:

Moslems, as well as others, have disregarded the historical facts. They have continually striven to turn this man [Muhammad] into an imaginary superhuman being, a sort of God in human clothes, and have generally ignored the ample evidence of his humanity. They have been present these fantasies as miracles.”

There is no record – NONE – in Mein Koran of Muhammad discussing God and love. Nor is there any record – NONE – of Muhammad discussing God, the spirit, the soul and the Golden Rule. It is all violence, hate, bile and the world riven into 2 – Moslems versus the rest.

Mein Koran has many passages in which the Fuehrer Muhammad is asked to perform a miracle. He always remains dumb and mute. He ignores the pleas. He does nothing. No resurrection of the dead, water was not turned into wine, 5.000 were not fed with a few loaves, the elements were not arrested, people were not cured.

Christ brought hope, faith, love, the golden rule and charity. Muhammad arrived touting sex slavery, misogyny, intolerance, anti-semiticism, a hatred of Christians and Jihad. Why would any educated, intelligent human follow Mein Muhammad ?

Mad Mohammed and his hatred of Christians.

Big brains deem supremacist intolerant hate to be the apogee of love and tolerance.

Bookmark and Share

It is rather curious that Muhammad, who raped, killed, tortured, murdered, had 15-24 wives and concubines [only the quantity not the act of misogyny is in doubt]; who waged Jihadic war to spread his totalitarianism, is considered a prophet. Christians who had refused to follow the illiterate Arab adventurer, and who had in part, fought with the Quraysh against the Muslims were condemned by Allah to suffer torture, death, enslavement and eternal damnation. Allah the moon deity Baal or Hu'Baal of Mecca, is of course a pseudonym for Muhammad within the pages of Mein Koran.

According to Muhammad-Allah, the Christians with their Trinity worship, are polytheists, wayward, greedy, linked with Satan and never to be trusted. Within Mein Koran polytheism is to be punished by death. Muhammad had a grudging respect for Monks and Nuns, but since they would not follow his Sharia or path, they were just another group of criminals and antagonists.

Fight against the Christian and Jews until they pay the tribute readily, being brought low into humiliation.” [9:29]

...monks devour the wealth of mankind wantonly and debar men from the way of Allah...” [9:34]

There will be painful doom to the rich and greedy Christian monks.” [9:34]

Jews and Christians believe in idols and false deities.” [4:51]

Jews and Christians are losers.” [5:53]

Christians are wrong about the Trinity. For that, they will have a painful doom.” [5:57]

Do not take Jews or Christians for friends. If you do, Allah will consider you to be one of them.” [5:51]

Christians and Jews are perverts. Allah himself fights against them.” [9:30]

Jews and Christians are evil transgressors.” [5:59]

Christians and Jews must believe what Allah has revealed to Muhammed; if not, Allah will turn them into apes, as He did to the Sabbath-breakers.” [4:47]

Fight, kill, hate the Christian. Pope Frank would say this proves Moslems love their Christian 'brothers'.

Muhammad seems to have learned most of his garbled and quite insane monotheistic theology from Nestorians and monks, at least in part. He would have encountered them on his travels to Syria on caravan business, before he turned to looting and pillaging caravans to sustain his Jihad. After the Christians mocked and rejected Muhammad, recognizing his insanity, they became cursed by the moon deity. Having failed to recognize Mohammed to be a prophet, the Christians would be punished and eternally damned.

Perverts, losers, apes, greedy, and engaging in false worship, the followers of Christ had to be supplanted by the 'purity' of Islam. To big brains such supremacist raving is deemed 'religious' and tolerant.