French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  

Back

Slavery - Recent Articles

The never-ending Muslim lust for human flesh and slave trading.

The opposite of what Christianity taught.

Bookmark and Share


As the Western world implodes in an orgy of anti-white racism and flu-fascism, erasing 3000 years of progress, using ‘slavery’ and ‘racism’ as pretexts, it rarely occurs to the racists (anti-white); that the cult of Muhammad including Black Muslims, were the great slave traders of history.  Arab Muslims shipped at least 50 million sub-Sarahan Blacks north to the Arab heartlands.  No trace of Blacks or Black culture exists in the Arab-Muslim states.  The Blacks were effaced, either through death, war, castration, or polygamous based reproduction with non-Blacks.  Nary a word from the clever people.  Similarly, 25 million Whites were enslaved, raped, killed by various Muslim states and empires over 1400 years.  At least 2 million were taken alone, by the Barbary coast pirates from the 15th to 19th centuries, far exceeding the 500.000 Black slaves that were transhipped across the Atlantic to America.  Nary a word from the clever people. 

 

The self-appointed very clever people who dominate the media, political establishment and academia, arrogantly ascertain, almost to a man (or a transgender), that Muhammad’s cult is a spiritual project of wondrous tolerance and civilization. Never, they declare, did their favourite pets engage in the terrible fascistic practices of slavery, rape, war, or Jihad.  Only the horrendously deformed and inferior white male did that.  Tears pour down their faces as they declaim the stunning achievements of the Meccan moon cult and how a pagan fascism eschewed slavery, ennobled the multicultural paradise and erected inter-alia: morality, ethics, spaghetti, mathematics, flying, architecture, advanced engineering and hospitals.  Back in the world of the 5 senses, the ignorance from the ‘clever people’, about the reality of Islam is matched only by their hubris and wandering stupidity.

 

The very clever people cannot however, even answer the most basic questions about their favourite ideology which has murdered some 300 million over 1400 years; and in whose name daily acts of barbarism are legion. Few have read anything about Islam, fewer still the Koran, and almost none the life of the mad Mohammed. Yet we are told that based on no facts, no historical understanding, and no knowledge, that the ideology of Submission is peace and harmony.

 

One simple objection to the Islamic cult which these very clever people cannot rationalize, is slavery. Christianity ended the trading of humans. The reduction of some of the human species to little more than animal status existed in all ancient empires and continues today throughout the width and breadth of Islamic and Arab culture. Yet only Christian Europe ended this practice. Islam did not and has not. In fact, it is not hard to find almost on a monthly basis, an Islamic cleric somewhere in the world, thundering that slavery is a part of Islamic law and culture, and cannot be stopped. Muslims view slaving as a natural by-product of Jihad. To the victor goes the spoils, the gold, and of course the beautiful Kufar women. As the Koran makes clear in numerous places, slavery is natural and sanctioned by the moon guy, Al-lah:

 

Sura 16 (The Bee), verse 75

“Allah sets forth a parable: (consider) a slave, the property of another, (who) has no power over anything, and one whom We have granted from Ourselves a goodly sustenance so he spends from it secretly and openly; are the two alike? (All) praise is due to Allah!"

 

Though Sura 16 verse 75 is gibberish, parading as a God-inspired phrase or 'parable', it tries to contrast the conditions of a slave who is owned by a Muslim. The conclusion is simple. The moon-idol Baal or Allah (meaning the Lord of Mecca who was Baal and Muhammad’s family were the moon deity’s caretakers), has granted "a goodly sustenance" to the Muslim, which he can spend openly or secretly as he pleases - including of course the acquisition of more slaves. Since the moon deity Allah, claims for himself the position of the guarantor and initiator of all of life's benefits, both the free Muslim's good fortune and the slave's misfortune are ultimately determined by Allah. This is fatalism writ large. Through his rhetorical question, "Are the two alike?", Muhammad is justifying the inequality between the slave and the freeman as if it was a natural occurrence – ordained and supported by Allah. This is true as long as it is the Muslim who owns the slave[s] of course.  Non-Muslims cannot own Muslim slaves. Al-lah would never approve of this.

 

Sura 33.50 also grants Mohammed and Muslims the right to own slaves:

“O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those [slaves] whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts, and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who fled with you; and a believing woman if she gave herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet desired to marry her -- specially for you, not for the (rest of) believers; We know what We have ordained for them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands possess in order that no blame may attach to you; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.”

 

'The right hand' is a literary allusion meaning the right hand which holds the collar of the slave. Slavery is fine within Islam, especially as it is a natural derivative of war. Muslims on the Jihad have every right to expect plunder, women and slaves.

 

These verses are two amongst many which not only permit Muslims to own humans – but actively encourage it. Islamic slave trading was and is a vital part of Jihad and the spread of the Arab pagan ideology. Islam is a predatory philosophy – one which needs to steal, thieve, plunder and rape in order to sustain itself. The spread of Islam was achieved by war, in large part to satiate the demands of the increasing numbers of followers who wanted a share in the spoils of land, chicks and gold. It is not a mystery as to why people joined the cult. Why become a Dhimmi or second-class tax and social slave when you can enjoy the many benefits of cult membership including an afterlife upon a heavenly plane; gorging on food, water, women and wine?

 

Christianity is different. In the late Roman empire, the Christian church [which was already being riven by debate and the establishment of different sects, a healthy development which led to argument, revision and rational discourse]; agitated against both slave trading and the ownership of slaves. It would take some 500-700 years to fully extirpate both practices within most of Europe. Slavery was only to resume as an institution under the centralization of despotic power and the replacement of Christian medieval law, with canonized Roman law.

 

Just as importantly the Christian sects all developed and supported the ideas around what is termed 'human rights'. Islam and other orthopraxis [correct behaviour]; focus solely on duties, not rights. It was only Christianity which developed natural law rights. Part of natural law is freedom from enslavement. Islam never has, and never will support such an ideal. Slavery is an integral part of the Muslim program. It is anathema to the Christian.

 

We know that Islam is fundamentally, in large part, a slave ideology from the mere fact that its founder, who is held up as the example of the perfect man, was a slave trader and owner. He did advise that slaves be treated well, since they are after all, important assets; 'Feed them what you eat yourself and clothe them with what you wear...They are God's people like unto you and be kind unto them.' Heart-warming. Be kind to them, but still trade and own them. Mohammed even freed a few slaves, married one, and adopted another. Islamophiles use this to justify their claims that he was against slavery. Of course, this is a lie. He traded in dozens of slaves and kept a well-documented and quite large group of female sex slaves. He made money and lascivious profit from this slave dealings.

 

It is rather odd that a slave trader and practitioner of slave-based sex is called a 'prophet' or a holy man.

 

On the other hand, no Christian leader in the early church owned slaves. Christ, who was the anti-thesis of Mohammed, denounced slavery and preached against the age-old evil. So too did many Christian sects and the church by the late Roman period was a loud opponent of the trade in human flesh. Nothing like this opposition existed in any period or epoch in Islam.

 

Today slave trading still goes on in the Muslim world. Whites, Blacks, Hindus, Buddhists, Muslim pre-teen girls are still enslaved and traded. The numbers are not truly known but based on anecdotal evidence they must total in the millions. In some countries in Muslim Africa slave status is passed down from one generation to the next. Yet few Western organizations, or Western Islamophiles will even admit to this current immorality within Islam, nor to its 1400-year history as a key component of Muslim imperialism. Likewise, the very clever people never credit European Christianity with the eradication of slavery, nor do they appreciate the massive costs in money and men borne by the British Empire and the northern US states, in eradicating the modern form of this heinous crime. For these extremely smart people Islam is only merriment and love - its slave trade and the ethos of violence and de-humanizing immorality does not, and never did exist.

 

Ignoring Moslem slave-owning in the Low IQ age of Communism-Fascism and Insurrection

If Black Lives really mattered; the Mosques would be torn down.

Bookmark and Share

 


 

Fascist-Totalitarian groups such as #BLM, Anti-fa, and other Soros-Obama funded insurgents will never attack welfare offices, agencies which purportedly cater to the poor minorities, nor certainly, mosques.  Their faux-outrage and insurrection are directed solely at Whites (making their movements racist), and civilisation itself. 

 

Moslems routinely rape, kill and attack Whites.  But their lives don’t matter.  Moslems slave-traded at least 10 million whites and murdered through the Muhammadan Jihad 15 million more during the Middle Ages.  But their lives don’t matter.

 

Muhammad was of course a slave owner, slave-trader, sex-slave Jihadist and racist whose handbook of hate states that those who go to hell, will have ‘black faces’.

 

Moslems own roughly 5 million Black slaves today in Africa and many thousands of Indian-brown slaves in the Gulf States and elsewhere.  But their lives don’t matter.

 

Moslems and Arabs are the great slave traders of Blacks – some 50 million Blacks sold into Moslem slavery over 1000 years.

 

Black Moslems in Nigeria have pulled down 2.000 Churches and killed almost 20.000 Black Christians, displacing 3 million, in the past 5 years.  No Fake News, Quackademic, Governmental, Black, ‘Social Justice’ outrage of course.  Black Christian lives don’t matter.

 

If Black Lives really mattered, then the Mosques would be torn down.

 

The Arab and Muslim love affair with slavery.

And Blacks too for that matter. Certainly not a white-only issue.

Bookmark and Share




Muslim brutality and Islam's primitive nature is represented by its devotion to slavery. From 622 A.D. until now, the Muslims have harvested, shipped, and enslaved somewhere between 11 to 30 million Blacks and Caucasians. Until the 20th century at least 11-15 million Blacks were taken out of Africa and shipped into the Arab heartland. A similar number of Whites and Caucasians from Eastern Europe and the Black Sea regions were likewise transhipped into Muslim empires until the 19th century.

A far greater number of Hindus, Central Asians and Buddhists were similarly enslaved in the Arab empire and its successor states in the Subcontinent and beyond. It is a sordid record never discussed. No one knows for sure, but it is not an exaggeration to suppose that 40 million non-Muslims were directly enslaved by Mohammedans. This is four times greater than the number of Blacks sent across to the Atlantic – 4 million of whom ended up in Brazil, and 2 milion of whom ended up in the United States. 

But don't worry no-one will discuss the history of Arab and Muslim slave trading. This after all is a White-only crime. 

Arab and later Muslim empires were of course built on plunder, squatting and slavery. The Arabs and Muslims did not invent, nor create, anything new. They simply took over the existing and far superior civilisations of the Jews, the Christians, the Persians, the Hindus and the Greeks. Medicine, mathematics, philosophy, writing, literature, plumbing, hospitals, sewers, architecture, cement, agricultural techniques, irrigation – any and all sundry accroutements of civilisation were built by the Greeks, the Romans, the Jews, the Persians, the Mesopotamians, or the Hindus. The Arabs contributed nothing. 

Except the slave trade that is. 

The Arabs were superb at trading human flesh. Better even than Blacks who had enslaved each other for millenia, long before the White man arrived on the African scene. The Arab's empire depended on slavery – for profit, for building, for tending to mines and industry, and even for military drafts. Without the trade in Black and White slaves, the Arab and Muslim empires would have collapsed. 

According to Bernard Lewis, author of 'Race and Slavery in the Middle East': "Black slaves were brought into the Islamic world by a number of routes - from West Africa across the Sahara to Morocco and Tunisia, from Chad across the desert to Libya, from East Africa down the Nile to Egypt, and across the Red Sea and Indian Ocean to Arabia and the Persian Gulf. Turkish slaves from the steppe-lands were marketed in Samarkand and other Muslim Central Asian cities and from there exported to Iran, the Fertile Crescent, and beyond. Caucasians, of increasing importance in the later centuries, were brought from the land bridge between the Black Sea and the Caspian and were marketed mainly in Aleppo and Mosul." The trade was vital for the Arab economy. 

One can make a very good argument that Islam and the Koran are inherently racist and anti-Black, if not anti-White. Kaffir is a derogatory Arab word first used to denote Blacks as inferior sub-humans, which was later expanded to include all non-Muslims. Slavery of Blacks and other non-Muslims is expressly accepted and encouraged in the Koran. Though the mad fascist Muslim founder Mohammed, states that freeing slaves gains merit, he certainly never made any prohibitions against acquiring slaves. In fact Mohammed encouraged by his own actions and various 'revelations' extensive slave-owning. Sura 33, verse 50 states for example: "Prophet, we have made lawful for you.... the slave-girls whom God has given you as booty." 

Mohammed not only owned and traded slaves himself – he also quite enjoyed female slaves as sex toys. Women captured in war or bought as slaves on the market could be raped at will by Muslims. The Koran encouraged this. Suras 23:1 and 70:22 state that it is lawful to have sex with slave girls. The Hadiths are filled with references to slaves owned by Mohammed and his associates. In one Hadith Mohammed intervened to reverse one man's emancipation of six slaves. By casting lots, Mohammed denied freedom to four of them. Charitable he was not. 

One does not recall the figure of Christ using women as sex chattel. 

With such a poor example set by the founder of Islam, it is no wonder that Muslim countries were slow to forbid slavery. Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807 and the institution in 1837. Over 500.000 White males died eradicating in part if not instantly in whole, the insidious and barbaric Southern US slave society. Yet no such corollary exists in the non-Western world. 

The Ottoman Empire abolished slavery in stages, beginning in 1847, when trading in slaves was banned in the Persian Gulf – under threat of British military action. Women slaves were still sold in the Ottoman Empire as late as 1908. Slavery continued after the Ottoman Empire was crushed in 1924. Qatar did not abolish slavery until 1952. Yemen and Saudi Arabia abolished slavery in 1962, and Mauritania did not officially abolish slavery until 1980. And of course slavery still exists in parts of Africa, Brazil, Pakistan, the Sudan and other parts of the Islamic world including the forced marriages of young Muslim girls, usually premised on sex, to older men in exchange for money. Compassionate this trade is not. 

Muslims appear to be obsessed with slavery. This would make sense. Slavery has often been declared by Muslim clerics and 'thinkers' as a fundamental part of Islamic culture and doctrine. Many Muslim leaders refuse to countenance the destruction of the slave institution. It is not hard to see why. Muslim slavery of others simply highlights their superiority and Allah's admonition via Mohammed, that Islam must conquer the globe. If male Muslims rule, than de facto the rest are slaves or at best, second-class dhimmi citizens, prey to whatever rules Muslims devise. 

Sharia law, Muslim demands in the West to reorder social and cultural life, and radical extremist arrogance in viewing the world as a pre-determined domain of Allah or the moon cult, all stem from the Muslim obsession with domination. Dominating others through jihad, terror, and slavery is a fundamental aspect of Islamic intolerance. 

This is not to say that all Muslims are voracious slave traders and sex chattel operators. But there is something remarkably pagan and primitive, if not outlandishly savage, about an ideology in the 21rst century which still protects and participates in the most de-humanizing of activities. The natural law rights of men, such an important part of Western civilisational development, is completely alien to Islam. 

It is no wonder that the history of Islam is in some sense, a history of the slave trade. From West Africa to the islands of Indonesia, the Arabs and Muslims have been history's most ruthless slavers and flesh traders. This ties in nicely with Islamic ideology and its commands. 

But don't worry – no one will discuss it. After all according to the multi-cult piety, Islam is holy and good, even one supposes, its extensive history of slavery.