Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was superior to anything Islam had developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions. Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'. Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.
10 million whites were enslaved by Moslems. Black slavery is still practised in the wonderful moon cult of Mecca's conquered and plundered territories in Africa and parts of Asia. Some 25 million Blacks – some estimates are at 200 million - have disappeared in the peaceful, tolerant, nirvana of Muhammadist society. Slavery is sanctioned in Mein Koran, with Moslems owning non Moslems with their 'right hand'. Sex slavery of Infidels by Moslems abounds in Western states, with girls as young as 8 years old being traded and sold for sex in places like the UK. No worries, Moslems are always relabelled in the UK and other states as 'Asian' or 'disaffected youth'.
The media – those pious practitioners of truth – and the politicians – those earnest beacons of love and light; along with the 'quackademics' – those practitioners of 'science' and enlightenment – would never utter a word against their favorite fascism. But the average person is now becoming aware of the extent of Moslem rapacity, the Moslem cult's addiction to sex slavery, its hatred of the Infidel, its blood lust to exterminate all who do not raise buttocks in the air to Baal-Muhammad, the moon deity and Fuehrer of a pagan bronze-age inspired cult.
An academic who is not a quack and who has produced illuminating work on the massive extent of Moslem slavery – sexual as well as skin based – is Robert Davis of Ohio University. One of his books is reviewed here 'Christian Slaves, Moslem Masters'.
'The jihadic aspect of the slave trade is quite apparent in the brutality of the Muslim incursions along the European coasts. Whole towns, regions and coastal areas were denuded. Much of littoral Italy was left seriously under- or even de-populated as people moved to the highlands and into walled cities. Raids taking whole villages and thousands of slaves at one time were almost annual events. The Muslim raiders also used terror along the coasts, destroying shrines, churches, monasteries and any imagery or structures that had a religious importance. Booty, gold, art and any worthwhile artifact which might help pay for the expedition was also taken. [p. 41]
The Muslim obsession with White slavery was also fuelled by the need to have slaves man their galleys.'
Davis estimates that 2-3 million whites were taken as slaves by Moslems just in North Africa and Ottoman Turkey alone, between 1500-1780. If we add in pre-1500, and include Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Europe, then calculate in the modern era, the sex slaving of white women by Moslems; than the total of white slaves taken by Moslems is at least 10 million over 1400 years. The culling of Blacks is significantly greater, but that won't stop American Blacks converting to Islam, like their hero the racist Muhammad Ali who belonged, to the Nation of Islam, a racist – Black Moslem group whose objective is to turn America into a Black Caliphate and eliminate all whites.
His new book focuses on the enslavement within North Africa and the Ottoman 'empire' [Moslems squatting on other people's land]; as a case of Infidelophobia, or the culling of non Moslems as sex slaves, galley slaves, or labor for mines. This means of course that Islam is peace and love and what about Dances with Wolves and the American treatment of Indians ?
Of course one should never expect a quackademic, or politician, or one of the many 'experts' wearing bags over their heads to comment on Moslem enslavement of non-Moslems, or Muhammadism's racism and supremacism; nor on Black Moslem racism against whites. Doing so means you are not a 'scientist' and are intolerant.
The Crusades were one of the most important events in our history – and one of the most glorious. They saved civilisation. There is little doubt about this. Islam or Mohammedanism as it should be called [or the cult of Mohammed], is a militant barbarous paganism. Why wouldn't you fight it?
In the great wide world of Western 'intelligentsia' and popular-culture, the Crusades to the Holy Land are portrayed as the expressions of a 'Dark Age' society, full of Christ-loving rabble, malcontents, thieves, morons, and hair-shirt wearing tonsured hypocrites. Only an illiterate, barbarous society would launch attacks against the lands of Christ and engage in the violent racial extermination of peaceful, non-White and entirely sophisticated and nuanced Moslems. Or so we are told. The reality is of course the opposite. The Crusades from 1099 to roughly 1291, were actions which saved Europe and civilisation. There can be little serious doubt about that. The Moslems brought the idea of intolerant Holy War or Jihad, into the heart of Europe enslaving and killing literally millions of people in Italy, Spain, Southern France conquering even the southern cantons of Switzerland in their lust for booty, women, land and power.
Cleansing the spiritual and material world in the name of the thing Allah, meant the fusing of church and state and the development of a robust intolerance and program of racist-supremacism which was already firmly embedded in Islamic theology. Europe was richer, more educated and more sophisticated in all matters of the political-economy when the Moslems attacked it in the early 8th century. We know this from Arab sources and from the obvious fact that marauders don't plunder poverty stricken areas. Vikings plundered England for its wealth. Moslems pillaged Europe for its treasures, its women and its civilisation.
When true barbarians – the Moslems –attack what should you do? Turn the other cheek? Sell your possessions and imitate St. Francis? Hide? Organize an international conference and create 'legal' statutes of international approval for either self-defense or projected-warring? Or do you simply get on with the business of defending yourself, training your military, fortifying your towns, educating your populace about the need to fight back; and making war on the enemy, 'until they have had enough' to quote Churchill? Only a demented self-loathing personality would accept any but the last option. Yet many in our society will reject the obvious – even those Christians who if they knew any history whatsoever, should know better.
“However, history bears me out. Not a single significant voice was raised against the Byzantines when they fought Islamic conquests. There are no records of Christian pacifists in Egypt or Syria urging a Gandhi-style non-violent response to the advances of Muslim armies. The new, pre-emptive dhimmitude being urged on us by certain clerics is not the fruit of Christian orthodoxy but contemporary liberalism, which acts as a kind of civilizational AIDS, finding excuses to undermine and render impossible every healthy measure of self-defense. Just as a retro-virus infiltrates and corrupts the existing DNA of human cells, so liberalism twists the tenets of Christian humanism, the Western insistence on tolerance and equality, our decent instinct of respect for other's cultures and beliefs, and turns them into toxic heresies by negating the countervailing values that made these values viable.”
Christianity is not by its theological nature naturally pacific. Neither is it defeatist.
The Crusades in the end did fail of course. There was never enough money, unity, leadership skill, men or to use the in-vogue Marxism, 'neo colonial' purpose, to make them permanent. Their eventual failure makes the claim of 'colonialism' a lie. There were no population transfers from Europe to the East. Most Crusaders left immediately after their tour of duty was over. Few Europeans even considered leaving the relatively prosperity of 'Dark Age' Europe [a myth] to settle in a dusty, barren, hot place beset by Moslems. Of the 7 main Crusades outlined by most historians [though there were really 3 phases to the 'First' Crusade]; only 2 were military victories. The first under the Knights of France; and the Third 100 years later under Richard the Lionheart [portrayed by Hollywood in yet another pathetically bad movie 'Robin Hood', starring Russell Crowe, as a raving mad dog who did nothing else other than murder innocent Muslims and bankrupt his state].
This is factual nonsense to anyone who has studied the Crusades. Also an idiocy is the idea that Richard's foe Saladin – a man Richard defeated in battle many times, never losing – was a Victorian gentleman. Saladin like any Muslim medieval leader murdered and butchered his way to power, annihilated cities and villages, killed the innocent and killed prisoners. The only reason he did not eradicate the inhabitants of Jerusalem in 1188 when he took the city, was because the Christians remaining in the city send an envoy to Saladin and plainly stated that all the Muslims remaining in Jerusalem would be killed unless Saladin guaranteed the Christians and Jews their freedom through ransom. The deal was made – and so was a lot of money for Saladin. Many thousands who could not be ransomed were shackled into slavery to work on Moslem projects including fortification building and agriculture. So much for the Hollywood myth that this man was the idealized saint. He was brutal self-interested murdering narcissist as any real history will show.
In any event the charges against the Crusades, perpetuated by the media and the base stupidity that is pop-culture, maintains that they were assaults by illiterate idiots, hungry, dirty and thirsting for land and gold is the precise opposite of what occurred. The Crusades were ruinously expensive, largely French and family-based in the supply of leaders and men, drawn almost exclusively from the elite with some exceptions; and extremely pious in their objective that the Holy Land was Christian land, and that the Moslem slaughter of Christians, pilgrims and the destruction of Christian holy places had to be avenged. Add to this the virulent Moslem destruction of Spain, the Moslem occupation of once Christian territory in Sicily and Spain; and the endless slave trading of Christians including their alliance with the Vikings in this regard; and the pillaging of the European littoral by Muslims, and the only surprise is the fact that it took 400 years for France and Catholic Europe to organize themselves and meet this threat.
The Crusades could only have emanated from a rich, confident and realistic culture, one which understood the existential threat posed by Mohammedanism and once which had first defeated the Moslem attempt to take all of Europe in 732 and 737 AD in France. The Christian King Charles Martel, victor against the Moslem infidel was as much of a true Crusader as Richard, Bohemond, or Phillip Augustus.
We should give thanks that these men existed. Men whose type cannot be found in today's Western world.
The insanity of Mein Koran:
|
And when the Qur'an is recited to them, they fall not prostrate, |
|
|
Nay, (on the contrary), those who disbelieve, belie (Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and whatever he brought, i.e. this Qur'an and Islamic Monotheism, etc.). |
|
|
And Allah knows best what they gather (of good and bad deeds), |
|
|
So announce to them a painful torment. |
|
|
Verily, those who put into trial the believing men and believing women (by torturing them and burning them), and then do not turn in repentance, (to Allah), will have the torment of Hell, and they will have the punishment of the burning Fire. |
|
|
Verily, (O Muhammad (Peace be upon him)) the Grip (Punishment) of your Lord is severe. |
|
|
Verily, He it is Who begins (punishment) and repeats (punishment in the Hereafter) (or originates the creation of everything, and then repeats it on the Day of Resurrection). |
|
|
Nay! The disbelievers (persisted) in denying (Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) and his Message of Islamic Monotheism). |
More Infidelophobia from Mein Koran.
It is well known that the smaller Suras, compiled during the early phase of Muhammad's cult, were culled and plagiarized from the Kabaa shrine. These verses are later re-assembled and infused with the usual litany of Koranic-Muhammadan intolerance towards non-Moslems. It is worthwhile to note two obvious facts. First, Muhammad's attempt at gang organization in Mecca, disguised as social 'reform' and concern for the 'poor', was a remarkable failure. He was deemed to be a social agitator, hungry for power, illiterate, quite stupid and probably insane. The Meccan elite had little patience for a man who was condemning Arab pagan theology, and distorting if not obstructing trade and money which flowed to the Meccan shrines from pilgrims and the pagan faithful. Instead of killing him for generating social turbulence the Meccans exiled him to Yathrib or Medina. A fateful mistake of course.
Second, Muhammad's lack of education, erudition and even innovative ideas is reflected by his plagiarism of both pagan Arab poems and ideas; and of Judeo-Christian tenets which he had picked up as a simple caravan trader in Syria. Nothing Muhammad said or uttered was new or ethical. Most saw through his thin veneer of 'social concern' to discern a brigand, a thug and a political-military adventurer, one who would lead armies, butcher men with his own hands, slaughter Jews, Christians and pagans, and engage in lurid sex trafficking and the establishment of a personal harem – all the while bathing in stolen gold and luxuries, and taxes for his Meccan cult centred around Hub'Al, the Lord, or the Al-Lah.
The moon idol, Al-Lah did not create the Koran. Muhammad and later generations of Arabs and Moslems did, each with a self-interested purpose. The Hadiths for example were largely compiled by the Abbasids during a civil war in the 9th century, some 200 years after the founder of Submission had been murdered by his own men.
Of particular import to Moslem and Arab culture is the random violence against non-cult members. The Koran is a merger of pagan Arab mores with Muhammad's intolerance. In the last 21 smaller verses of the cult document, there are 388 verses. Only 109 verses or 28%preach hate speech against the Infidel. Only a cult document would contain such lurid hatred against Unbelievers.
If you read these smaller poems and Suras you will notice some obvious themes, which are reflected throughout Mein Koran. It is thus a lie to say that the early Meccan verses are 'peaceful' and the later Medina verses violent. The violence and stupidity of Muhammad's cult runs in torrents from start to finish, and is refracted and redounded throughout his fascistic leadership and life:
Infidels are evil, greedy, stupid, ignorant and linked with Satan. They can be killed. Many verses above reference individuals that Muhammad murdered, justifying their deaths by the tautological claim that they were Unbelievers, or that they mocked or criticized Muhammad.
Muhammad must be obeyed since the Al-Lah idol has designated Muhammad to be the most important human ever. Not to follow in-toto, Muhammad's diktat is a 'sin' perpetrated by 'criminals'.
Al-Lah is the only free-will force in the entire universe. Humans only have the 'free will' to follow what he wants them to follow.
All Infidels including those importunate enough even to question Al-Lah [aka Muhammad] will be tortured in Hell-fire on Judgement Day.
Islam is superior to any other cult, religion or social organization [Sura 9-102:6, you keep your 'religion' and don't taint Islam with your dogma].
These themes are that of a cult, not a religion. Perhaps Moslems might first want to read the Koran to associate themselves with the pagan-fascist [communalism which eradicates the individual, rationality and free-will], cult of a man who was most likely quite insane.
More Infidelophobia from Mein Koran. Cleaving Asunder – the heads from Infidel bodies as they cascade down to hellfire, condemned by Al Lah, the Meccan moon god and Muhammad's family idol:
|
And verily, the Fujjar (the wicked, disbelievers, sinners and evil-doers) will be in the blazing Fire (Hell), |
|
|
In which they will enter, and taste its burning flame on the Day of Recompense, |
|
|
And they (Al-Fujjar) will not be absent therefrom (i.e. will not go out from the Hell). |
|
|
And what will make you know what the Day of Recompense is? |
Sura 82 adds nothing to mankind's collective intelligence. No metaphysics make an appearance. Depressing, violent and stupid, with the same repetitive theology: submit, prostrate, punish the Infidel, and obey Mohammed [or Allah since both are the same].
“O man! What has seduced you from your Lord Most Beneficent? Him Who created you. Fashioned you in due proportion, and gave you a just bias; In whatever form he wills, He puts you together. Nay! But you do reject Right and Judgment!” [82:6-9]
Mein Koran is clear that there is no free-will. This is the opposite of Catholicism. Without free-will there is no civilization. Nothing. Not having free-will denies freedom, free speech, and makes work, effort, innovation, and suffering to achieve goals, utterly pointless. The El-Lah, or Al-Lah moon deity is the only 'thing' or dialectical force which commands and uses 'will'.
The Allah thing determines all, and manages every single action in the universe, including your Judgement day. All Infidels and non-Muslims will be punished, because the Al-Lah deity has denied you the 'wisdom' to embrace Islam and has instead prepared a 'grievous penalty'. The wicked are of course Jews, Christians and pagans who refuse to embrace and submit to Moslem fascism:
“And what will explain to you what the Day of Judgement is? Again what will explain to you what the Day of Judgement is? (It will be) the Day when no soul shall have power (to do) anything for another: for the Command, that Day, will be (wholly) with Allah.” [82:16-19]
and
“And the wicked – they will be in the Hell, Which they will enter on the Day of Judgment, And they will not be able to keep away therefrom.” [82:14-15]
The Infidel non Moslem ape and pig will know that this recompense is justified because they are Fujjar disbelievers who are by default, sinners, wicked and criminal. Such people are only fit for Hell-fire. So spaketh der Fuehrer Muhammad.