Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was superior to anything Islam had developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions. Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'. Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.
As the West submits itself to the Fascism of PC speech restrictions and the Fascist Supremacism of Muhammadism, it is worth remembering at Christmas, that the birthplace of Christ, is almost devoid of Christianity, extirpated by Moslems. No Fake News Media outrage. No State Departments lamentation. No Fake Education assessment. No UN angst. Just more violence, death, and hate from Moslems toward Christians in the Fake non-state, non-entity of ‘Palestine’. Not even the Church will mention it. Abridged version of original Gatestone Institute article (‘Silent Night’) is below.
|
Christianity is on the verge of disappearing in the place of its birth, including Bethlehem. According to lawyer and scholar Justus Reid Weiner, "The systematic persecution of Christian Arabs living in Palestinian areas is being met with nearly total silence by the international community, human rights activists, the media and NGOs... In a society where Arab Christians have no voice and no protection it is no surprise that they are leaving." (Image source: Daniel Case/Wikimedia Commons) |
"The Persecution of Christians in the Palestinian Authority," a report by Dr. Edy Cohen, published by the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies earlier this year, goes a long way in validating this supposition (on-going violence against Christians).
Moreover, as often happens when Muslims attack Christians in Islamic nations, "Despite the [Christian] residents' cries for help" in Jifna, "the PA police did not intervene during the hours of mayhem. They have not arrested any suspects." Similarly, "no suspects were arrested" in the two church attacks.
Palestinian Christians, in short, are suffering from the same patterns of persecution — including church attacks, kidnappings and forced conversion— as their co-religionists in dozensof Muslim nations. The difference, however, is that the persecution of Palestinian Christians has "received no coverage in the Palestinian media." In fact, Cohen explains, "a full gag order was imposed in many cases":
"The only thing that interests the PA is that events of this kind not be leaked to the media. Fatah regularly exerts heavy pressure on Christians not to report the acts of violence and vandalism from which they frequently suffer, as such publicity could damage the PA's image as an actor capable of protecting the lives and property of the Christian minority under its rule. Even less does the PA want to be depicted as a radical entity that persecutes religious minorities. That image could have negative repercussions for the massive international, and particularly European, aid the PA receives."
Considered another way, the bread and butter of the Palestinian Authority and its supporters, particularly in the media, is to portray the Palestinians as victims of unjust aggression and discrimination from Israel. This narrative would be jeopardized if the international community learned that Palestinians are themselves persecuting fellow Palestinians — solely on account of religion. It might be hard to muster sympathy for a supposedly oppressed people when one realizes that they themselves are doing the oppressing of the minorities in their midst, and for no other reason than religious bigotry.
Because they are so sensitive to this potential difficulty, "PA officials exert pressure on local Christian to not report such incidents, which threaten to unmask the Palestinian Authority as yet another Middle East regime beholden to a radical Islamic ideology," Cohen writes in another report.
"Far more important to the Palestinian Authority than arresting those who assault Christian sites is keeping such incidents out of the mainstream media. And they are very successful in this regard. Indeed, only a handful of smaller local outlets bothered to report on these latest break-ins. The mainstream international media ignored them altogether."
Notably, a similar dynamic sometimes exists concerning Muslim refugees. Although West European politicians and media present them as persecuted and oppressed, in need of a welcoming hand, some Muslim migrants themselves persecute and oppress Christian minorities among them — whether by terrorizing them in refugee camps, or drowning them in the Mediterranean.
Objective numbers confirm that Christians living under Hamas and the PA are experiencing some unpleasantry that Muslims are not: there were approximately 3,500 Christians in the Gaza Strip in 2007; now, there are now reportedly no more than 500-1,300.
As Justus Reid Weiner, a lawyer and scholar well-acquainted with the region, explains:
"The systematic persecution of Christian Arabs living in Palestinian areas is being met with nearly total silence by the international community, human rights activists, the media and NGOs... In a society where Arab Christians have no voice and no protection it is no surprise that they are leaving."
By all counts, Christianity is on the verge of disappearing in the place of its birth, including the scene of the Nativity --Bethlehem.
An anodyne to the Fake News media, Fake Education, Fake Moslem-victimhood cults, which caper and scamper over the information landscape, like diseased baboons, braying and howling their toxic falsehoods. Mr Spencer is the author of over 20 books on the Moslem Jihad, an expert, erudite, urbane, factual, unemotional, equipoised. His site JihadWatch.org is an indispensable account of the modern Moslem Jihad, a continuation of 1400 years of Infidel-Kuffar slaughter, rape and domination and associated societal destruction.
Very few real facts about Muhammadism (as ‘Islam’ was rightly called up to the end of the 19th century) are to be found in schools, universities or the Fake News MSM. The truth about the cult of Muhammad can be found however in reality and in the endless, ceaseless Jihadic violence of the Meccan cult, which is on full display every day around the world. 1500 verses of hate speech against Jews, Christians and non-Moslems permeates their book ‘Recital’ (Koran). There is no peace until Muhammadism rules over the Jews and Christians.
To state this truth, is as Orwell wrote, now a revolutionary act.
Robert Spencer explains the Moslem Jihadic reality in Fake ‘Palestine’, in a book full of facts and history that there never was a Palestine, why there has never been a Palestinian ‘people’, state or empire; and why there never will be ‘peace’ in the Middle East until every Jew (and Christian we should also emphasise) is dead or a dhimmi-slave. This is what Muhammadism means by submission and peace. The Kuffar is dead or under complete Moslem domination.
An uncomfortable fact for those who advance the claim that the Palestinians are the indigenous people of the area is that they have no history: there was never a state of Palestine, never a king or president of Palestine, never (until quite recently) a Palestinian flag, and nothing that distinguishes the Palestinians culturally, linguistically, or otherwise from the other Arabs of the region.
In 1946, the Arab American historian Philip Hitti testified before the 1946 Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry: “There is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not”—meaning that there had never been a nation bearing this name.
the KGB (the Soviet Committee for State Security) invented the “Palestinians,” an even smaller people who were, the propaganda insisted, oppressed by a powerful and ruthless Israel. The French historians Guy Millière and David Horowitz, authors of the book Comment le peuple palestinien fut inventé (How the Palestinian People Were Invented), explain that the Palestinians were invented in order to “transform a population into a weapon of mass destruction against Israel and the Jewish people, to demonize Israel, and to give totalitarianism and anti-Semitism renewed means of action.”
Syrian President Hafez Assad once told Yasser Arafat: “You do not represent Palestine as much as we do. Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. You are an integral part of the Syrian people, Palestine is an integral part of Syria. Therefore it is we, the Syrian authorities, who are the true representatives of the Palestinian people.”
Prince Hassan of the Jordanian National Assembly put it simply on February 2, 1970: “Palestine is Jordan and Jordan is Palestine; there is only one land, with one history and one and the same fate.”
King Hussein of Jordan put it most succinctly of all in 1981: “The truth is that Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan.”
Palestine never existed. The original Balfour declaration and land assigned to the Jewish state was eventually split into two parts - one Moslem called Jordan, the other Jewish, called Israel.
Philistinia (Greek) did exist along the coast of Israel into Lebanon. This is a historical and archaeological fact witnessed in the Old Testament as well. Judea, Judah and Samaria existed, likewise proven and without debate. The Romans in AD 130 renamed Judea and Judah ‘Palestine’ (Latin for Philistine), the hard enemies of the Hebrews and Jews, who lived along the coast, represented in the Old Testament by the 8 to 9 foot tall Goliath and his 5 brothers, with Goliath improbably slain by the Jew Shepherd David.
Such facts are apparently quite shocking to the majority of low-information ignoramuses who suffuse our ‘modern’ society. The same half-wits who vote for the Moslem invasion of their Western state, who chant their ‘Palestinian’ slogans in howls of Jew-hate and racism; and who are completely ignorant about the 1400 year Moslem Jihad to control the globe with 250 million victims the result of history’s most baleful Fascism.
Spencer: “Jihad,” Arabic for “struggle,” in Islamic theology primarily means warfare against unbelievers in order to establish the supremacy of the Muslims over them, and the hegemony of Islamic law. This is a religious imperative, based on the Qur’an’s command to fight against the People of the Book and ensure that they “feel themselves subdued” (9:29). It makes it impossible for Muslims to accept a Jewish state in which Muslims live,
The Jews have always lived in Israel dating back to 2000 BC. Even after the Roman-induced diasporas of AD 70 and 130, the Jews persisted. The Moslems conquered the area in 637 AD and when the Ottoman Moslem empire withered and died, the land of Israel was depopulated, poor and without a Moslem presence.
The desolate area began to show new life. In 1900, a British consulate report stated that “there can be no doubt that the establishment of the Jewish colonies in Palestine has brought about a great change in the aspect of that country.” Four years later, another British consular report declared that “the Jewish element is spreading all over Palestine and represents today the most enterprising part of the population.”
The Jews who made aliyah in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries didn’t come as armed marauders, seizing land from its owners by force. They obtained the land in a far more conventional and prosaic way: they bought it.
The Jews overpaid for the land in Israel from absentee Moslem owners in Ottoman lands and Egypt.
When the emigration of Jews to Israel began in the late 19th century, the land was desolate, unpopulated. When the Jews rebuilt civilisation and wealth, which did not exist prior the 5 waves of Jewish resettlement, Arab Moslems began arriving to partake of the success, and as always, immediately claimed victimhood, suffering and angst at the growing Jewish presence in a land they had long forsaken. Arab Moslem riot and violence against Jews continued until the Jewish state was proclaimed in 1947, then the official Jihad began. Israel has been attacked by Moslems in 6 wars and 3 major ‘intifadas’ or uprisings, all the while giving up land and security for ‘peace’.
Islam is still Islam. Its Qur’an has not changed; neither has its theology. The imperatives that led the Muslim Arabs to reject a two-state solution in 1947, and to go to war to destroy the nascent Jewish state in 1948, still exist, and are still believed by millions of Muslims worldwide. It is only by ignoring this, or by remaining in blissful willful ignorance of it, that diplomats and presidents and kings could ever have thought that a negotiated agreement could be hit upon that would enable Israelis and Palestinians to lay down their arms and live side by side in peace.
All that happens with ‘peace talks’, is that the Jewish state shrinks, its borders become insecure, the Moslems increase their numbers and population on the ceded territory to launch yet more attacks. The Moslems called ‘Palestinians’ are swelled from UN Refugee camps, dating back to 1948. At one time there were maybe 50.000 ‘refugees’, now the number is climbing to 2 million – some 70 years after the first Moslem Jihad against the Israeli state. The ‘Palestinians’ are kept poor, uneducated, for a reason – to provide cannon fodder for the Jihad and the Ghazi or Moslem warriors. Palestinian education is Koranic propaganda, much of it hate against Israel and the West, with declarations of Jihad and Jew genocide. Even the Fake News has documented these facts.
None of the great worthies feted by the Western media – Sadat, Arafat, Abbas – leaders of the Moslem Arabs in Israel (or Palestinians), were dedicated to peace. As Spencer so accurately writes, all of these ‘great’ personalities were dedicated to Israel’s destruction using different means. The ‘Palestinian’ leadership is of course corrupt and extremely wealthy, even as the average Moslem in their territory suffers.
Particularly maddening to many Palestinians is the vast corruption of their leaders. Mahmoud Abbas and his two sons control a business empire worth four hundred million dollars. Two of the Hamas leaders have done even better. Dr. Musa Abu Marzook, the number-two man in Hamas, has a net worth of two to three billion dollars. The leader of Hamas’s political wing, Khaled Mashaal, is also a billionaire. Dr. Moshe Elad, a colonel in the Israeli army and a lecturer in the Middle East Department at Western Galilee Academic College, says: “Estimates around the world are that Mashaal is currently worth $2.6 billion, but the numbers mentioned by the Arab commentators (based on their many sources) are much higher, varying from two to five billion dollars invested in Egyptian and Persian Gulf banks, and some in real estate projects in the Persian Gulf countries.” Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh has an estimated four million dollars.
The Palestinian delusion is about Jihad, money, power and destroying Jews. Anyone who buys into it, is abetting Moslem fascism and racism. Any student, teacher, armchair general and expert who expounds support for the ‘Palestinians’ against the Jewish state has not bothered to read Mein Koran, Moslem history, or the absurd fantasy surrounding the ‘Palestinian state’. They need to read this book to re-educate themselves and get a firmer grasp on reality.
==END
Finally, a Catholic Priest with a
clue. To answer his question: no, of
course not. Islam is not peace anymore
than Slavery is Freedom, or Nazism a project of ‘equality’.
The Church saturated with its Gay
Priests and the 40 year sex-scandal with Gays molesting altar boys (the LGBT
bona fides) ; its Globaloney-warming-baloney-complex (its fake science bona
fides); its election of a ridiculous perhaps non-Catholic as Pope calling
himself Francis the II (its Earth Friendly bona fides, though Francis Assisi
did try to convert Moslems unlike the present Pope Stupid); its deeply neurotic
Vatican-Curia-led love and admiration for the Moslem fascism (emanating from
Vatican II and general illiteracy), which has spent 1400 years trying to
eradicate the Catholic Church and which is killing Christians every day; may
seem beyond any hope of redemption or relevancy in the defence of Western
Civilisation and Christianity. Enter
Priest Portella, from a very small minority of Priests who see the world for
what it is. It would not surprise me if
he was removed, de-frocked, and humiliated, for his criticism of the Fascism called
Muhammadism or Submission (Islam). Pope
Frank the Stupid will take a dim view of Portella’s erudition (assuming he can
read and comprehend what is written).
Portella (bold is mine):
Islamists, through the doctrine of dawa (outreach or proselyting),
which is an all-encompassing precursor to jihad, seek to convert non-Muslims
and summon them to conquer the West, utilizing any number of mechanisms to achieve that goal. While the
West is preoccupied with fighting hate speech, Islamophobia, and white
supremacist groups, it seems to have willfully ignored the cultivation of
Muslim hate speech and supremacist attitudes toward non-Muslims through dawa.
Cultural jihadists have also gained headway through their own charities and
well-bankrolled networks, which have enabled them to infiltrate university
campuses and influence the media and government officials. Consequently, they are
able to foster dialogue and coalition building, favorable to their political
arrangement and consistent with the political-religious foundation of the
sharia. This has become evident by having preferential treatment over other
religious denominations despite the separation of church and state as outlined
by the First Amendment, such as the prayer room that was set up in 2017 for
Muslims at Liberty High School in Frisco, Texas, at taxpayers’ expense. Islamists,
personifying themselves in the media as victims of religious hatred and
with the help of philanthropists such as George Soros and organizations such as
the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and the American Civil Liberties
Union (ACLU), have been partially successful….
The ignorance of the Arabs:
As the medieval Arab historian Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) said, the Arabs
were an ignorant race, with no literary or scientific knowledge, and when they
wished to probe the mysteries of creation and the universe they turned for
information to the Jews [and Christian literature] who had accepted Islam.
These, says this learned author, were no less ignorant than the surrounding
Arabs; but they brought over into Islam a mass of their own traditions,
especially those dealing with the origin of the creation and with the future of
the human race.
(the Koran) is a medieval codification of Bedouin customs that pre-date
Islam which are still in force today, such as female genital mutilation,
draconian-type penal sanctions for adultery, and theft and the commerce of
slavery. Given the current political events, the subject of jihad shall be
given primary attention in this section. Jihad is a divine call which all
Muslims must respond to.
Mein Koran jumbles
up and mis-quotes many passages from the Bible.
The Arab Bedouin, including Muhammad, were illiterate, poor and on the
fringes of far greater and richer civilisations – which they coveted – such as the
Sassanid and Byzantine Christian empires. They viewed the Jewish and Christian
communities and traders in their midst as far more successful than themselves
and wished to emulate them. The monotheistic
traditions and cultural attributes along with related economic and social success,
impressed the Arabs and they tried to copy Jews and Christians. When they were rejected under the leadership
of the brigand Muhammad, they simply killed and stole what they viewed as ‘Allah’s’
and Muhammad’s.
Jihad – kill the
Infidel:
Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those
who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war.… When you meet your enemies who are polytheists,
invite them to three courses of action.… If they refuse to migrate, tell them
that they will have the status of Bedouin Muslims and will be subjected to the
Commands of Allah like other Muslims, but they will not get any share from the
spoils of war or Fai’ except when they actually fight with the Muslims (against
the disbelievers). If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the
jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If
they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.—Sahih Muslim,
Book 19, hadith 4294
The genesis of Islam, by contrast, was inextricably tied with the
formation of a sovereign society that was inherently universal and imperialist. Temporal and religious powers, which were both one
and the same, were combined in the person of Muhammad as Prophet, who
claimed that Allah invested him with this authority. This is why he assumed
altogether the role of head of state and head of the religion, which
permitted him to cloak his political ambitions with a religious aura.
Consequently, he channeled Islam’s energies into “its instrument of aggressive
expansion, there [being] no internal organism of equal force to counterbalance
it.” Muhammad offered “a programme of Arab state formation and conquest:
the creation of an umma, the initiation of jihad.” He was a prophet with a
political quest and not, as is so often presented, a prophet who just happened
to become involved with politics.
Lots of compulsion
in Mein Koran:
The People of the Book who did not accept Islam were forced to pay
taxes if they wished to continue living under the newly created Islamic
community. Before engaging into cohesive explanation, the entire passage of
verse 256 must be read: There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction
is henceforth distinct from error. And he who rejects false deities [Taghut]
and believes in Allah has grasped a firm handhold which will never break Allah
is Hearer, Knower. It also cannot be read independently from other verses in
the second sura but in unison with them, such as verse 193: And right
[fight] them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah. But if
they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrongdoers.
The purpose for jihad as a holy war is to invite the nonbeliever, after
proselytizing (i.e., the dawa has failed, or to prevent the violation of the
poll tax owed by the People of the Book): Fight against such of those who have
been given the Scripture [People
of the Book] who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who forbid not
that which Allah has forbidden by His Messenger, and follow [adopt] not the
religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they
give the jizya willingly out of hand and have been humbled.—Sura 9, 29
Muhammad’s will to
power and the slaughter of Jews and Christians:
Sira Rasul Allah (the first written biography of Muhammad) by Ibn
Ishaq, which says: Allah said, “It is not for any prophet to take prisoners
until he has made slaughter on earth,” i.e., “slaughtered his enemies until he
drives them from the land. You [Muhammad], desire the lure of this world, its
goods and the ransom captives. But Allah desires the next world [a unified
earthly one],” i.e., killing
them to manifest the religion which He wishes to manifest and by which the next
world may be attained.—Ibn Ishaq, 326–327
The doctrine of jihad as holy war was fully developed by the height of
the Middle Ages, as Arabs and Turks justified conquering other lands and, in
compliance with Allah’s will, simultaneously instituting an Islamic body
politic. By the late fifteenth century, jihad emerged as a divine obligatory
and bellicose institution for all Muslims. It was tantamount to a religious
duty because of the universalism of the Islamic mission to either convert or
submit everybody to Allah’s will. Jihad, therefore, presupposed the existence
of a unified Islamic umma under a caliph. It was his fard ayn (moral
obligation) to expand the territory of the state and to eventually bring “the
whole earth under the sway of Islam and to extirpate unbelief.”
Said Ibn al-Musayyab (642–715), considered to be among the foremost
authorities in Islamic jurisprudence, “deemed fighting in the way of Allah to
be an everlasting obligation upon Muslims.” Here as elsewhere, the Quran makes reference “to
the activity by a derivative of the verb meaning to fight (qātala) [which
appears fifty-four times, whereas qatala = to kill, appears eighty-three times]
They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be
alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause
of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you
find them and take not from among them any ally or helper, save those who seek
refuge with a people with whom you have a covenant, or those who come to you
with hearts reluctant to fight with you, or fight for their own people. Had
Allah willed, He could have given them authority over you.—Sura 4, 89–90
Moslems cannot kill
other Moslems
Ibn Kathir upholds this
position. Referring to the early commentator Sayid Ibn Jubayr (who lived at the
time of Prophet Muhammad and was a companion of Aisha): He who allows
himself to shed the blood of a Muslim, is like he who allows shedding the blood
of all people. He who forbids shedding the blood of one Muslim, is like he
who forbids the blood of all people. Al-Tabari and al-Qurtubi both say that the
intended meaning of verse 32 refers to the killing of a soul of particular
spiritual importance, such as a prophet or a “just imam,” or it stems from the
point of view of the murdered individual. It is quite apparent that the
pseudo-verse 32 as presented by apologists is misleading because it is not just
out of context, but it is deliberately abbreviated in order to deceive those
not familiar with the Quran (to say nothing of the hadiths that encourage
violence). The verse in its…
Sharia Barbarism, the anti-thesis
of modernity (it is not a law, but a Bronze-age, pagan ideal):
….science and technology characterize our modern world, then Islamic
civilization is defined as a civilization of law (sharia), which is none other
than exacting mandates as they exist in the intellect of Allah, the Lawgiver.
This is why modern Islamic state law encompasses much more than a list of
concessions and prohibitions, to which governmental or religious authorities
have the duty to punish or reward. If this then is law, it gives the idea that
it is narrated. In other words, law is prepolitical and “cannot be read as
either ‘divine’ or unmediated but must be understood ‘as an aspect of hegemonic
contestation, a technique of articulating political claims in terms of legal
rights and duties.’”
Part of the tragedy in the Islamic world is that it is embedded in
sharia law, the guide to Muslim daily living, which is founded on the sayings
of Muhammad (hadiths); doctors of the law (fuqahā’) use these sayings to
exercise a quasi-absolute authority over the Muslim faithful. Authorization for rigid punishment in Islamic
countries, such as capital punishment for Muslims who cease to observe Islam or
convert to another religion, is based on the hadith from Sahih al-Bukhari, in
which the Prophet of Islam stated, “Whoever changes his [Islamic]
religion, then kill him.” The Ulema in Morocco knows that this norm
goes against Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which
includes the right “to change … religion or belief.” In order not to contradict
this article, the Prophet’s statement is now understood to mean “whoever
abandons the umma” should be put to death.
Unlike the violence recorded in the Old Testament, which is limited to
historical events, the Quran is more ambiguous than might be expected of a book
from a god who claims to love his creation and forgive the sinner. Many
contemporary Muslims exercise a personal choice to construe their sacred book’s
appeal to the taking of arms and financing terrorism according to their own
ideas. Islamic apologists have catered to these preferences with tenuous
positions that camouflage historical fact, generally lacking any sort of
profound scrutiny. This problem is not necessarily one of bad people but of bad
ideology. In other words, the point of concern is not whether people are
Persian, Egyptian, or Palestinian, but rather their indoctrination of the
sharia, which justifies the use of violence and other human rights violations.
As the General Secretary of the Nahdlatul Ulama Supreme Council, the world’s
largest Muslim organization, Imam Yahya Cholil Staquf, stated: “The problem
lies within Islam itself.”
The Moslem Emigration and Jihad-of-the-Womb,
in the West:
In 1974, Algerian President Houari Boumendienne, in an address to the
United Nations, stated, One day, millions of men will leave the Southern
Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as
friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it
with their sons. The wombs
of our women will give us victory. According to the Pew Research Center, “if
current demographic trends continue, the number of Muslims is expected to
exceed the number of Christians [worldwide] by the end of this century”;
the book’s third purpose is to highlight this fact.
In France, for example, while each family has 1.8 children, Muslims
have 8.1 children per family. In southern France, there are now more mosques
than churches; 30% of children are Islamic. It is foreseen that by 2027, one in
every five Frenchmen will be Muslim. And, if that rate continues, within two generations France will be
an Islamic Republic. Within the last thirty years, the Islamic population
in Great Britain rose from eighty-two thousand to two and a half million: a
thirty-fold increase; there are over one thousand mosques, many of them former
churches. In the Netherlands, over 50% of all newborns are Muslim, and in only
fifteen years half [its] population will be all Muslim.
Vijah Kumar argues that “[a]ll Islamic mosques have Islamic leaders
who can call Muslims for fighting, and as such are satellite headquarters for
spreading [l]iteral Islam’s political doctrine of world domination and
totalitarianism, no matter how many ‘moderate Muslims’ they serve.”
Muhammad, Sex and Sodomy:
Jurists, including al-Tabari, explain, “The boys are likened to
scattered pearls, to indicate their beauty and good looks.” The question to be
asked is, if the act of committing sodomy or other sexual acts with boys on the
part of adult men is wrong, why does the Quran present boys in such an erotic
way? There are also hadiths that apparently are used to encourage such behavior:
Buhaysah reported on the authority of his father: My father sought permission
from the Prophet. (When permission was granted and he came near him) he entered
him and his shirt, and began to kiss him and embrace him.—Sunan Abu Dawood,
Book 9, hadith 1665 Usaid ibn Hudair reported: While he was talking to people
and telling jokes to make them laugh, the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon
him, poked him in the side with a staff. Usaid said, “Let me retaliate!” The
Prophet said, “Take retaliation.” Usaid said, “Indeed, you are wearing a shirt
and I am not.” The Prophet lifted up his shirt, so he hugged him and kissed his
side. Usaid said, “This is all I wanted, O Messenger of Allah.”— Musnad Ahamda,
Sunan Abu Dawood, hadith 5224403 According to estimates, “as many as 50
percent of the men in the Pashtun tribal areas of southern Afghanistan take boy
lovers
W. H. T. Gairdner once stated, while some of the deeds of the Prophet
are considered sacrilegious in the West, they are presented in Islamic
biographical works as pious. [I]ncidents in the life of an Arab conqueror,
the tales of raiding, private assassinations and public executions, perpetual
enlargements of the harem and so forth, might be historically explicable and
therefore pardonable. [I]t is another matter that they should be taken as a
setting forth of the moral ideal for all time.
Moslems slave-traded 40-50
million Blacks and 10-20 million Whites and still own 1+ million slaves today:
It is believed that in Mauritania, which has the largest population of
black slaves today, more than a half-million blacks are coerced into inhumane
labor, grotesque sexual practices, and breeding. According to a Human Rights Watch/Africa report,
customary abuse of slaves in Mauritania include beatings, denial of food, and
prolonged exposure to the sun, with hands and feet tied together.416 This was
confirmed by the US State Department in 2009, when it reported: Still today [in
Mauritania], masters lend their slaves’ labor to other individuals, female
slaves are sexually exploited and children are made to work and rarely receive
an education. Slavery particularly affects women and children, who are the most
vulnerable among the vulnerable. Women of child-bearing age have a harder time
emancipating because they are producers of slave labor and perceived as
extremely valuable.
In North Sudan, slavery was restored in 1983, when the Islamic
government began using slave raids as a weapon in its military campaign to put
down the southern rebellion against the government’s imposition of Islamic law. “The government armed Arab Muslim militia groups and
encouraged them to raid Southern villages, steal their property, and take
their women and children as slaves – [t]ens of thousands of [Christians and
non-Muslims] were captured and enslaved.” Muslims today react by saying that Christians
equally approved the practice of slavery. This issue is not uncontested in
sacred scripture, the New Testament in particular, which not only acknowledged
the institution of slavery but instructed slaves to be obedient to their
masters “just as [they] would obey Christ” (Ephesians 6:5).
This book is essential reading,
especially by Catholics, who are brainwashed by their Church leadership into
the untenable and quite illiterate view that Muhammadism is a ‘brother’ religion
and the 40.000 Moslem attacks since 9-11; along with hundreds of thousands of
dead and wounded, is somehow ‘un-Islamic’.
Or, that the reduction of Medieval Europe’s population by 25-30% from
Moslem invasion, Jihad, sex-trafficking, slave-trading and yearly depredations
and war, was somehow disconnected from the ‘real, authentic, Islam’, itself
spread by brigands, totalitarians and thugs such as Muhammad and Abu Bakr, in
which Jews, Christians and Pagans were murdered, slaughtered, raped and
forcibly converted.
Read Mein Koran, read it and weep,
as page after page extols the Muslim Umma and exhorts it to completely
eviscerate non-Moslems. Muhammadism is a
globally focused fascism.
And this is the point isn’t it. Islamist is Moslem. Islamist rule means Sharia. Sunni and Shia doctrine (95% of Moslems); advocate
world-submission to the Al Lah, Baal the moon deity of Mecca, known as Hu-Baal
or the Lord of Mecca, caretaken by Muhammad’s family. Sharia premised on (Mein) Koran und Muhammad’s
diktat, is the only form of social-political-ideological organisation. Ineluctably totalitarian.
To paraphrase Churchill, your
average Moslem may appear to be brave, rational, motivated, open, honest,
caring and non-violent. So confirms the
Iraqi Christian in the news story below.
But behind closed doors, in private, underneath the surface? In reality, any Moslem who believes in
Mohammed (24 sex slaves, a murderer, brigand, racist, war-leader, married to a
6 year old etc); and in Sharia, is part of a fascistic-totalitarian cult.
Whether they are active or
inactive is immaterial (see Nazi Germany or Communist Russia). It is irrelevant that they are not personally
crucifying Christians imitating the 34 year (1894-1918), Turkish genocide of Armenian
Christians, or of the ISIS Moslem criminals in Syria or Iraq who beheaded or
crucified ‘Infidels’ for defying the ‘Caliphate’, Sharia and the House of
Islam; the important point is that Sharia Barbarism and the Ein Reich-Ein Volk
under Muhammad through irrefutable logic; means the complete ‘totalising’ of world
society under Moslem control.
We see this fact, this movement,
this Moslem will of domination, in every Western state.
50% of Moslems living in the West
want Sharia. Islamophobia is a totalitarian
left-wing tool to demonise opposition to Sharia – fully supported by Moslems in
each state. This means that Moslems are
now beyond criticism, reform, or even introspection. Treated as preferred pets, they impose, and do
not even bother to pretend to reciprocate.
Multi-culturalism is thus uni-directional. White, Black, Brown, Indigenous non-Moslem
populations must suffer and accord their actions to Moslem sensitives. The opposite does not apply.
Moslems in the West have
infiltrated politics, the police, administration, the civil service and the
elite. Their aim is to Moslemify the
Western state in question, over time with demography and using the blind-ignorant
‘tolerance’, pursued by the Western elite and its globalist-socialist denizens.
Islamophobia, hate-speech and other
Marxist tools of oppression, along with cadres of useful idiots, simply abet
that penetration and control.
Muhammadism by itself, by its own
books and history, is a totalitarian, intolerant force of war and domination
against the Infidel. This is as true
outside the bloody borders of Muhammadan states, as it is within Western states.
“A 2018 survey by the very same institution (Pew
Research) expected the number of Muslims in Sweden to reach 4.5 million, by way
of demographics and immigration, prompting the Christian
newspaper Dagen to ask whether the
Swedish cross will be replaced by a crescent.”
10% of the Swedish population (at
least), is Moslem. So of course, Sweden
will be Islamified. There was never a
vote, a referendum, no one asked the Swedish peasant if that is what he/she
wanted. It was simply imposed. Democracy you say?
https://sputniknews.com/europe/201912021077458546-iraqi-christians-warn-sweden-of-islamist-rule/
“While Swedish researchers have brushed aside the
idea of an Islamic takeover despite a dramatic demographic change, they
admitted the rise of Islamist indoctrination and increasing tensions.
Among Iraqi Christians there is a widespread belief
that many European countries, such as Sweden and France, have “naively”
received too many Muslims from the Middle East and now risk an increased
Islamic influence to the point of Islamist rule, the Christian magazine Världen Idag reported.
“You lose control”, church worker Layla (a
pseudonym for security reasons) from Iraqi Kurdistan told the magazine. Among
Christian Iraqis like herself, she said, there is a belief that Sweden will
turn Islamist in the future, because of the large immigration from Muslim
countries.
“We who have grown up here know what
Islam is. It is not the people, the Muslims, that I warn about, but the
ideology”, she said. “Although most Muslims don't believe in jihad, they
believe in Mohammad. They believe that all peoples should become Muslims and
that there is a reward in heaven for those who bring people to Islam”.
Layla urged European churches to “wake up”.
“If Islamists gain power, they will
not treat you according to human rights, but according to Sharia law”, she
stressed. “Love the Muslims, but be aware. Jesus says we should be cunning as
snakes and innocent as doves”, she concluded, urging not to yield to any
pressure.
Pastor Basil (also a pseudonym), who has met
thousands of Yazidis and Christians fleeing from Daesh*, recalled the Muslim
concept of taqiya, a precautionary dissimulation or denial of religious belief.
According to him, it is frequently utilised by radical Muslims as well to hide their true intent.
“This means that radicals 'lie low'
and adapt to a more non-religious society to gain power”, he said, warning of
sleeper cells ready for action, while acting to “take over” once a
parliamentary majority is in place.
According to Islamologist Rickard Lagervall of Lund
University and Jönköping University, it is unlikely that Islamists would take
over in Sweden any time soon, since they are a minority. Another reason is that
Islamists are a divided group that includes not only Daesh sympathisers and
jihadists, but also “puritan” Salafists who, he suggested, avoid politics. In
addition, “ordinary” Muslims are a fragmented group as well, he stressed.
“Within the Muslim background group, many are not
necessarily Muslim practitioners”, he stressed.
At the same time, Lagervall admitted that radical
Muslims try to influence moderate Muslims to become more
devoted.
The number of Muslims in Sweden has spiked dramatically in a matter of decades. In 1950,
there were merely 500 Muslims in the Scandinavian country. Today, their share
is estimated to have exceeded 800,000, amounting to 8.1 percent of the
population, according to the Pew Research Centre.
A 2018 survey by the very same institution expected
the number of Muslims in Sweden to reach 4.5 million, by way of demographics and immigration, prompting the Christian
newspaper Dagen to ask whether the
Swedish cross will be replaced by a crescent.
Aje Carlbom, associate professor of social
anthropology at Malmö University, ventured it was an exaggeration that Islam
will take over Europe. He stressed that many Muslims become secularised and
thus have fewer children. At the same time, he envisioned clear tensions
between Swedes and Muslim communities, especially radical ones.
* Daesh (ISIS/ISIL/IS/Islamic State) is a terrorist
organisation banned in Russia and other countries”
Good article below from Seneca III from Middle England writing in The Gates of Vienna Blog about yet another Moslem terror attack in London. He is perfectly correct that about 25% of Europe’s Medieval population or about 15 million, were enslaved, killed, or forcibly converted by Moslems, to Muhammadism. At least 10 million Whites have been enslaved by Moslems from the Ural Mountains to Iceland over 1400 years as the Jihad sought to conquer Europe from the East and the South.
One important
factor in the Viking invasions of the British Isles and France, was the slave
trade and linkup with the Moslems.
Dublin was founded as slave-trade centre. Many British slaves ended up in North Africa
or the Middle East. There will never be
a Fake News remonstration on this point; or any lessons taught in the
(mis)Education systems. Nothing can
criticise the State’s 2nd favourite pets (the first is the LGBT
cult, the third are the Green Nazis).
Keep in mind that the London
Metro Police and Scotland Yard state that they prevent on average, 1 attack in
London each month, many of these targeting the Transport network, others, shopping
malls or shopping streets like Oxford Circus.
Over
£800 million pounds per year is spent in the UK on ‘anti-terrorism’, or against
the Moslem Jihad. At least 1/3 of this
would be for London alone. This is a
fantastical sum for protection from a cult which now has 2000 Mosques across
the UK and most likely, 10 million adherents (vs. the 5 million of ‘official’
government statistics), which will double in 10 years.
So, thanks to the cult of the
Mulit-Kulti, the low IQs who maintain that carpet bombing the UK with Moslems,
Africans and East Europeans is ‘harmonious’ and ‘just’, we have:
-Extraordinary
increase in taxes and spending for ‘security’
-Still
the highest level of crime ever recorded
-45
to 90 knife attacks each day on average just in London
-Worst
gang violence on record in London
-Highest
drug usage on record (per capita) in London
-70%
of Moslems unemployed in London
-NHS,
Schools, and the Welfare state implosion in both quality and budgets in London
-Random
Moslem attacks which result in dead and wounded in London
-Literally
hundreds of millions of £ being spent on ‘security’ – from Moslem attacks
But if you oppose any of this,
you are a racist-fascist-KKK-Phobic-Trump supporting-degenerate-Nazi.
https://gatesofvienna.net/2019/11/the-lost-city-of-londonistan/
The Lost City of Londonistan
by Seneca III
Before the perfectly naturally angry and precisely directed
response to today’s atrocity on and about London Bridge is officially
designated ‘wrongthink’ and generates the inevitable screams of ‘Islamophobia!’
from the collective entity ultimately responsible, perhaps a little dose of
facts and history may help level the playing field.
The noun ‘Islamophobia’ is a compound oxymoron concocted to
obfuscate historic reality, and it is the reverse of the same propaganda coin
the obverse of which reads ‘Religion of Peace’. Consider: how could such a
long, fully documented record of fourteen centuries of relentless Islamic
aggression during which Muslims launched jihad after jihad spreading death and
atrocity far and wide across the globe now be ignored in order to enforce a
revisionist dialogue totally contrary to recorded facts?
Europe itself was assaulted on every quarter from Iceland to
Ireland to Scotland and England to Scandinavia and the Low Countries; from
Spain to France to the Balkans and Austria. The devastation caused by this
incessant slaughter and the after-effects of Islam’s scorched-earth policy was
immense, and rendered vast swathes of Europe uninhabitable. According to
some sources it was during these periods that approximately 15 million
Europeans, close to 20% of a population of roughly 78 million, were either
killed outright, starved to death, died of diseases spread through displacement
or were taken and sold into predominantly sexual slavery in the souks of Arabia
and the Barbary Coast.
The Italian scholar Franco Cardini wrote: “If we ask
ourselves how and when the modern notion of Europe and the European identity
was born, we realise the extent to which Islam was a factor (albeit a negative
one) in its creation. Repeated Muslim aggression against Europe between the
seventh to eighth centuries, then between the fourteenth and the eighteenth
centuries was the ‘violent midwife’ to Europe.”
That we Europeans became less involved in internecine conflicts
and more militantly oriented beyond our borders is not an indictable action but
a natural product of the will to survive and a growing awareness that offence
is the best form of defence. It was not a case of the West being the aggressor
and Islam the victim, as the cultural relativism narrative would have us
believe; if anyone has a grievance to air it is the West, not the demented
slaves of Allah in the occupied territories now established from Londonistan to
Glasgow and blighting the whole face of Europe like a human pox.
Remember, nothing in Islam changes. In the final analysis we
would be mad to accept the claim that we Westerners are in any way responsible
for the current state of affairs, other than that in our sublime stupidity and
fear of being labelled ‘Racist!’ we have allowed our corrupted academic and
political classes to physically impose this pre-medieval abomination upon us
without much more than a fearful murmur of disapproval.
Thus, now we are fighting another battle in a war
that has rumbled on for 1,400 years. It is a battle we are losing, because
those who should be defending us — including the Church and the State and its
executive arms — are instead close-ranking with the enemy and conspiring to
prevent us from fighting back with the ruthless efficiency that, thanks to
Islam, became an abiding and sustaining characteristic of our culture.
Furthermore, when examining the motivations of the stabby-stabby
enricher (now thankfully amongst his virgins) who is purported to have
heroically killed two woman, probably because they simply were women, it is
worth bearing in mind that in 1631 the Muslim Pirate Murad Rais led a group of
raiders to the village of Baltimore, Ireland, and abducted over a hundred women
and children bound to be sold as sex slaves on auction blocks throughout the
Umma (shades of Rotherham etc., anyone?).
Later, in 1627, Murad occupied the island of Lundy
in mouth of the Bristol Channel, using it as a holding pen for captured
Europeans prior to sending them on to the slave markets of Barbary. Thus it
came to pass that in 1632 a small English force stormed the Island and put the
pirates to the sword, a practical solution to the problem and a solution
worth bearing in mind, considering Lundy is the only place where the black flag
of Islam has ever flown over English soil — until recently, that is — and that
is why we need to respond to today’s events in a similar manner before it is
really is too late. There is nothing new in the Great Game.
(bold is mine)