French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  

Archive - December 2020

Islam at its core is a slave supporting political fascism.

Sura 8 is just an example of Muhammadanism's depravity.

Bookmark and Share


In the age of the attempted overthrow and collapse of civilisation including CV-19, likely mandatory RNA changing injections, BLM and anti-white racism, stolen elections, open-borders, the exaltation of Muhammadanism and Chinese Communism, freedom for the average peasant now means to be enslaved, managed, monitored and controlled.  The current pandemic of totalitarianism finds equal expression within Recital or Mein Koran; in which slavery is a common and important theme.


In fact, the words 'slaves' and 'slave' comprise 5% of Koranic verses. Why would any 'religious' document be discussing slavery on such a scale? Own slaves, sell slaves, 'free' slaves [if they become, or already are, Moslem]; 'possess slaves with your right hand' and of course, be a good 'slave' of Al-Lah or Abd-ullah, a common Moslem surname with many variations and spellings.  Slavery is vital to Muhammadanism and slavery to the Al-Lah idol, and to his mouthpiece, the political leader and warrior Muhammad, means freedom in Islam.


Liberate yourself by becoming a slave of the cult. How this would improve the development of civilization and humanism only Moslems and the moon deity Baal or Al-Lah, know?


In Sura 8 reviewed here, only 42 % of verses are hate speech against non-Moslems. Surely a moderately civilized amount.


Out of 75 verses in Chapter 8, there are only 33 which could be classified as hate speech under existing hate speech laws in Canada and Europe. A favourite is surely this catchy phrase 8:39:

And fight them on until there is no more tumult or oppression, and there prevail justice and faith in Allah altogether and everywhere; but if they cease, verily Allah sees all that they do.

Moslems must fight on until the House of War is subdued. This is what is meant by 'no more tumult or oppression'. The existence of Infidels and deniers of the Allah cult is simply insufferable to the pious Moslem. The Allah-thing's commandment is clear – every human must be in bondage and submission to the moon deity, or to the cult of Muhammad.”


Ah, such love and harmony. Surely the New Testament states the same:  'Fight non-Christians until there is no more tumult'.


Of course, it doesn’t.  Neither does the Old Testament, which is the world’s most accurate history of the Bronze Age, proven through extant documents, archaeology, and antiquarian proofs. The Old Testament relates specific wars, tribes and battles as the monotheists who believed in the eternal God, fought to overcome the Baal and related Pagan cults of the Near East.  The Canaanites, Hittites, Sumerians, Assyrians, Edomites, Babylonians and all other tribes, worshipped celestial cults, including Baal the moon deity.  Without defeating them in battle, monotheism would not exist, and neither would modern civilisation.  It the union of monotheism, with Rome and Athens, in the body of the Christian church which builds modern systems, technologies, science, medicine, proto-capitalism, schools, universities and inventions too numerous to list. 


It was against these Pagan hordes who normalised child and human sacrifice (Abraham and Isaac); sex trafficking, polygamy, stoning, economic slavery, illiteracy, injustice and misogyny, that monotheists had to defeat, in order to truly develop and progress human civilisation.  Contrary to Enlightenment ignorance, the White slave based empires of Rome and Greece were not the apogee of human civilisation, but simply social constructs whose beneficiaries numbered in the few; and whose victims constituted the many.  Great architecture aside, the average person lived in a pagan circle of hell, with no meaning, justice or purpose to their lives.


We see the same pagan dichotomy within Islam or Muhammadanism.  In Muhammandan liturgy, the moon deity cult of Baal, and Bronze age ‘laws’ or Sharia, is the only framework for society.  It is a total or totalitarian construct.  No diversity or inclusionary tolerance for plurality is allowed.  Non-Moslem Infidels are to be terrorized until they simply accept Muhammad or Al-Lah as their 'God', the celestial moon deity of Mecca to reign supreme:



(Remember) when your Lord inspired the angels, "Verily, I am with you, so keep firm those who have believed. I will cast terror into the hearts of those who have disbelieved, so strike them over the necks, and smite over all their fingers and toes."


Slaves are what cults need. The greatest slave of Al-Lah, the moon deity of Mecca or Hub'Allah is of course Muhammad, the greatest human in history, who led the Moslems to their famous victory at Badr in 624 against a Meccan force, cementing Muhammad's leadership over his band of brigands and justifying his faith in the Al-Lah idol, who apparently sent down angels during the battle to help the Moslems defeat the pagan Meccans. For his leadership Muhammad was conveniently given 20% of all the 'booty':



And know that whatever of war-booty that you may gain, verily one-fifth (1/5th) of it is assigned to Allahand to the Messenger, and to the near relatives [of the Messenger (Muhammad SAW)], (and also) the orphans, Al-Masakin (the poor) and the wayfarer, if you have believed in Allah and in that which We sent down to Our slave (Muhammad SAW) on the Day of criterion (between right and wrong), the Day when the two forces met (the battle of Badr) - And Allah is Able to do all things.


The Al-Lah is so very generous sending his devoted 'slave' to lead the Arabs from poverty and ignorance to the ennobling pursuits of brigandage, sex-chattel slavery, warring and murder. Very enlightening. Al-Lah demands that Moslems steal from Unbelievers because he wants his slaves, including his favourite Muhammad, to be happy:



"This is because of that which your hands had forwarded. And verily, Allah is not unjust to His slaves."


Al-Lah is very kind to his slaves; and Al-Lah's slaves must punish and humiliate the Infidels:



So if you gain the mastery over them in war, punish them severely in order to disperse those who are behind them, so that they may learn a lesson.


And let not those who disbelieve think that they can outstrip (escape from the punishment). Verily, they will never be able to save themselves (from Allah's Punishment).


The Infidels cannot hide from temporal Moslem wrath and war, nor from an after-life of 'grievous punishment'. By extension, the Al-Lah, and Muhammad cult will only tolerate good 'slaves of Allah', who cause no 'tumult' or 'oppression' of Moslems and their beliefs. These good slaves must fight to purge the planet of non-Moslem belief. This theology of Infidelophobia, only takes up 42% of Sura 8. Surely a civilized amount.



And those who disbelieve are allies to one another, (and) if you (Muslims of the whole world collectively) do not do so (i.e. become allies, as one united block with one Khalifah - chief Muslim ruler for the whole Muslim world to make victorious Allah's Religion of Islamic Monotheism), there will be Fitnah (wars, battles, polytheism, etc.) and oppression on earth, and a great mischief and corruption (appearance of polytheism).


Slavery is rife within Muhammad’s cult because its handbook extols war against non-Muslims and the enslavement of Infidels, of less-than-pious-enough Muslims and of women to be used as sex-slaves for Muslim men.  Islam at its core is a slave supporting political fascism.


Muslim attacks against Christians and Christianity - ignored by the Secular Religions.

Obsessed with White and Christian hatred, the Fake News et al could care less.

Bookmark and Share


 Around the world, Muslims continue to attack and destroy Christianity.  Fake News, Fake Academics, Fake Experts, Fake Atheopath moralists, have nothing to say.




The Congo

12/10/2020 DRC (International Christian Concern) – Gunmen believed to be linked with the Allied Democratic Forces in Eastern DRC, reportedly killed at least 30 Christians in a set of attack on villages in North Kivu province. During the attacks, which took place between November 20 and December 3, Barnabus Fund has reported that at least 30 Christians were killed, 10 women were raped, and at least 15 were abducted by the group. Another 14 people were injured during this time frame.


Barnabus reported that locals and officials confirmed these five attacks and that the militants targeted Christians. When found the Christians were told to either convert to Islam or die. Those attacked included a pastor who lost five members in his family who would not convert. “They also tried to force my wife and our four children to convert to Islam, but when they refused to convert, they shot my wife in the head while our four children were cut into pieces with a sword,” the pastor told Barnabus.


ADF is an Islamic militant group that was started in Western Uganda last century, but has since moved its operations to the Eastern half of DRC. Due to the vast landscape, weak government and poor population, ADF as well as other Islamic extremist groups have found an open home in this region where they can live, train and recruit new members.


Indonesian Terrorist Burns Down Church and Christian Homes, Killing Four

Salvation Army’s Post in Central Sulawesi Attacked




11/27/2020 Washington D.C. (International Christian Concern) – International Christian Concern (ICC) has learned that on November 27, an alleged terrorist attacked the Salvation Army’s service post in central Sulawesi, before burning six houses of church members. Four Christians were murdered, with three being butchered.


Around 8 a.m., the Lewonu Lembantongoa Service Post, located in Sigi Regency, Central Sulawesi, set up as an outreach effort by the Salvation Army in Indonesia (Bala Keselamatan), was attacked by the alleged terrorist.


He set the church on fire, before attacking Captain Arnianto, Mrs. Mpapa, Lieutenant Abram Kako and his wife and burning down six houses of the church members. Out of the four victims, three were hacked to death, while the other was burned.


In the video seen by ICC, the charred victim was pulled from a pile of ruins, with smoke still rising in the background. The fowler position of the body suggests the agony and pain endured by the victim before death.



12/13/2020 Washington, D.C. (International Christian Concern) – International Christian Concern (ICC) has learned that on December 11, 2020, Azerbaijan broke its ceasefire agreement by launching an attack in Nagorno-Karabakh’s (Armenian: Artsakh’s) Hadrut district. Azerbaijani President Aliyev blamed Armenia for the attacks, threatening to “break its head with an iron fist ”and saying, “This time, we will destroy them completely.”


This incident was reported by the Russian forces deployed as peacekeepers to monitor the ceasefire. It occurred just one day after Azerbaijan and Turkey hosted a joint military parade to celebrate their victory over Nagorno-Karabakh. Turkey is jointly serving with Russia in a peacekeeper role, but has supported Azerbaijan’s aggressive military actions in Nagorno-Karabakh. This location is ethnically Armenian and religiously Christian. Turkey and Azerbaijan share a common Turkish Islamic identity, commonly referred to as “one nation, two states.”


The timing of the attack is noteworthy, particularly given the comments made by Turkey’s President Erdogan during Azerbaijan’s military parade. The Ottoman military march was played, and President Erdogan stated, “Today is the day when the souls of Nuri Pasha, Enver Pasha, and the brave soldiers of the Islamic Army of the Caucasus are blessed.”


By making these references, President Erdogan deliberately framed the context of the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict within the lens of the 1915 genocide committed by Turks against the Armenian Christian community. He also framed the context of the conflict within the lens of Islamic expansionism. This language compromises Turkey’s role as a delegated peacekeeper within the conflict. It also encourages Azerbaijan to continue breaking the ceasefire agreement.


The report entitled Turkey: Challenges Facing Christians 2016-2020 also explains the impact of this kind of situation on Turkey’s local Christian community. It reads, “Turkey’s recent military activities in the surrounding region have impacted the security of its Christian communities through tensions arising from nationalist rhetoric and provocative actions. This exacerbates the sense of alienation from mainstream Turkish society.”



Modern day secularists, flicking their hair, and preening themselves on Black-Lives-Matter, don’t care.  Christian Lives apparently, don’t matter whatsoever.  Even if they are Black.


Muslim Imperialism. Apparently only White imperialism is bad.

Double Standards from the Secular Religious Multi-cultural cult.

Bookmark and Share


One of the interesting aspects of Arab and Islamic imperialism is the utter destruction visited upon age-old cultures and societies by Muslims.  Contrary to the secular religion of multi-cultural vibrancy, cultures are not equal, and Islamic-Muhammadan culture does not tolerate other non-Islamified societies, their heritage, monuments or ideals.  Muslims historically, were active in tearing down Churches, burning books, destroying idols and shrines related to Zoroastrianism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Sikhism or Christianity.  Libraries were set on fire in Alexandria first by Caesar’s men, then later in the 7th century by Muslims.  A fact which is now of course blamed on Christians.


Islamic domination does not practice toleration.  It preaches the opposite.  The complete eradication of non-Muhammadan society and culture.


Once the Muslims invade, take over and control the former host society's culture and state are simply in-toto, either eradicated and/or co-opted for the benefit of Muslims. We see the Muslim invasion of Western states follow a very simple pattern. 

1-Mass invasion or immigration into Western Urban Areas

2-Once at 5-10% of the population within an area, demands by Muslims for special status and recognition

3-Building of Mosques in key locations within the Urban centre (funded illegally by foreign Muslim states or organisation)

4-When the Muslim population is more than 10%, shrill demands for Sharia Barbarism, infiltration of politics, the Police, School systems

5-When the Muslim population is above 15%, legislation against criticism of the Muhammadan cult (Muslim-o-phobia), attacks on Churches and Christianity begin in earnest (burning down Notre Dame for eg)

6-Large donations to Universities, the Media to establish pro-Muslim propaganda


Eventually when Muslims achieve 40% population saturation they engage in overt violence, threats, intimidation and achieve dominance either through the secular processes using ironically non-Muslim media and state support; or as in the case of Lebanon and elsewhere, through a violent civil war. 


The Muslim invasion of the West is simply that:  an invasion and act of Koranic imperialism.


According to modern sensitivity however, crass imperialism, or ‘colonialism’ is a term which seems only to apply to Europeans, Americans, and Jews. The truism of Arab and Muslim imperialism, and its historical brutality including the slave trading and culling of 10-20 million White Europeans and 35-45 million Black Africans, including some 5 million in Africa today; is ignored in the media, academia, by 'experts' and of course by the multi-cult appeasers who view an Arabian moon cult as a 'religion'. One can find no other theology in the history of man as intolerant as Islam. None. A simple look at history destroys the myth of Islamic 'tolerance'.


The epileptic, obese, rich and quite insane Mohammed predicted that not only would Constantinople become Islamic, but that both Persia and even Italy would be Islamicized. His prediction is so far valid and in the case of Italy and Rome it might still come true – much to the delirious merriment of the cultural Marxists one assumes. Mohammed’s injunction that Islam must rule the world inspired the Bedouin. Post the death of Submission's founder, small, mobile and fanatical Arab armies headed towards the two richest states of the day – Christian Byzantium and Sassanid Persia. In fact the first major clash between the Eastern Romans and the Arabs had occurred in 629 AD in northern Arabia three years before Mohammed died (mad Muhammad was poisoned by one of his own staff who was likely weary from all the moon deity revelations). It was a battle won by the Byzantines who did not follow up the victory and march on Mecca to eradicate the moon cult. Needless to say, this was a tragic mistake. Islam could and should have been strangled in its cradle.


In 632 AD the Arabs began their assault on Persian territory. Sassanid Persia in the 7th century AD was smashed in short order by the Arab armies motivated by gold, women, property and Allah. Within a century nothing remained of the 2.000 year old Sassanid culture, premised on Zoroastrianism, Perse and Mede historical legacy, and the glories of what was once the great yet despotic and Orientalized kingdoms of Cyrus, Darius, Xerxes and their progeny of Sassanid Kings. For centuries Persia had been the world's superpower. Some of its artifacts including engineering and writing were of the highest quality and ingenuity. Yet within a single generation this 2.000-year-old imperial grandeur was utterly effaced by the Arabs and Muslims. Muslim Iran today has nothing in common with its previous culture and artifacts of spiritual, economic, social and imperialist history. Persia or Iran is simply today a colony of Greater Arabia Koranic imperialism.


Christian Byzantium suffered a similar but more prolonged fate. Byzantinian Levant, Syria and Egypt were quickly conquered by the Arabs within a decade from 636 AD to 645 AD. Constantinople finally succumbed some 800 years later, to Islamicised Turks in 1453 AD. But the rapid rate of destruction enacted by the Muslims upon the Near East is the telling point.


Byzantine culture, religious worship, architecture and history was either annihilated, suppressed or forced into second class slave status. Economic trade which was open and complex under the Byzantine empire was either disrupted or ended. Trade and economic stagnation further ossified Byzantine's political and cultural structures and weakened its military. It is a testimony to Greek and Roman culture and perseverance that it lasted 800 years after Persia fell.


As Islam spread the entire edifice of Greek and Roman history, a project which spanned from Alexander's Seleucid society to the Eastern Roman empire or 1000 years, was totally effaced. Muslims destroyed churches or co-opted them into mosques and Islamic centres. A Muslim-dominated society was hierarchical. The 'dhimmis' or second class Jewish and Christian slaves had to pay all the taxes, undergo social humiliations, and were routinely attacked, slaughtered enslaved or exiled depending on the whims of the local Muslim ruler. In effect Jewish, Christian, Greek and Roman society ceased to exist after the Arabs humiliated the Christian armies over a series of desultory battles lasting little more than a mere decade across the Levant and Syria.


Similar experiences and cultural destruction were visited upon the Berbers and Christians in North and East Africa; the Jews and Christians in Spain and the Balkans, the Buddhists and Hindus in a wide arc stretching from Afghanistan through to southern India, and even the Chinese and South-East Asians in regions where Muslims and Arabs came to dominate and still do today.


Integration and tolerance are anathema to Islam and the Mohammedan cult. Muslims or at least the true Muslim, one who seeks to imitate Mohammed [the most perfect of men], seek to conquer, to control, to convert and if necessary, to kill and eradicate the Kufar and Unbeliever. Mohammedanism is Islam. The Muslim must say each day that he prostrates himself to Allah and follows Allah's messenger Mohammed. The Muslim daily prayer also curses Jews and Christians. Logically we therefore state that Islam is ultimately the cult of Mohammed.


If Mohammed murdered his enemies, had sex-slaves, raped, slave-traded, was a racist, killed Jews and Christians, and expanded the cult of submission through war and in his own words through 'terror', why shouldn't the pious Muslim do likewise? The history of Islam's spread is instructive. It was violent, bloody and fascistic. At least accepting that fact makes discussing the true nature of what we are dealing with a lot more intelligent and useful.


Muhammad and Hitler. Pagan Fascism. The similarities of the programs are remarkable.

Muslim Fascism. Never discussed by the big brains.

Bookmark and Share


Hitler declared many times that Linz Austria must become the new Mecca. A place of cult pilgrimage where Nazi pagan monuments and rituals would overawe the true believer. It was not a mistake that Hitler chose Islam and Mecca as his model. For he and Mohammed and the cults they created, were quite similar.


If you read the history of Mohammed and the formation of his cult, two obvious observations come to mind. First Islam is based on a moon cult, suffused with some Judaic notions of monotheism. Second, the racism, supremacism, violence, calls to war, the innumerable campaigns, the pilfering and rape of caravans and towns, and the code of obedience, all foreshadow Nazism and the modern pagan cults embodied in the leaderships of Hitler, Mussolini, Lenin and Stalin.


Since no-one in the Lower educational or Fake media establishments bothers to read about Mohammed, these uncomfortable truths – the war, the hate, the bile, the carnage, the injunction to conquer the world – are quietly untold. But that is the real historical Mohammed. He was not a great man, as Time Magazine ejaculated when assigning status to the most important individuals in history. Mohammed was a monster, a man who created a cult, which as Churchill remarked, inculcated in its votaries a primitive, and ruthless passion – the scourge of civilisation


Only a modern liberal-Marxist would possibly assert that Mohammed was anything other than a pagan-fascist leader of the bloodiest order.


What is a fascist anyways?


The word gets thrown around a lot – usually by ignorant liberals and Marxists as they try to shut down inquiry, debate or rationality. Any opposition to the insipid liberal-Marxist view of the world including: the Covid cult, globaloney warming; anti-capitalism; anti-Semitism; pro-Arabism; pro-huge Government; and cheap anti-Americanism; is immediately met with howls of 'Hitler' and 'Fascist'. How stupid. Yet for a cult and its leader, who are and were fascistic there is a gaping, dumb silence.


There are variations in fascism of course. But essentially the main ideas of a fascism are the following. In the book ‘Fascism and Paganism’, modern fascism uses the guise of spirituality in the form of paganism, to unify its followers, around an ideal of controlling society and indeed the world. As the expert Paxton states in page 40 of his book 'Fascism'; 'Fascism seeks out in each national culture those themes that are best capable of mobilising a mass movement of regeneration, unification, and purity, directed against liberal individualism and constitutionalism...The themes that appeal to fascists in one cultural tradition may seem simply silly to another.'


Indeed. A fascist is then a person who follows the demands of pagan cult – unyieldingly. The oft-cited complaint, '...come on Hitler and Mohammed had nothing in common, and the programs each led, were different....' is only partially true. Certainly, to unify a backwards, 7th century illiterate mob of Bedouins, into a military-political force requires much different stratagems, than doing the same with reasonably well educated; cultured; and Europeanized 20th century Germans. The details of the programs and leadership styles do not have to match. Just the objectives and aspects of what the programs want to achieve. In that regard Hitler and Mohammed are remarkably similar.


Mohammed's life is hardly discussed today.


Every aspect of Christianity and Christ has been picked over, accepted, rejected, ridiculed, debated and calibrated within archaeological science and philosophy.


Not so with Mohammed and Islam. We are just supposed to bow our heads and accept the fact that Mohammed was a 'prophet'. Maybe he was – of death. If you read Robert Spencer's fine book, 'The Truth about Mohammed', or information about what he actually did in his, you will very quickly get a different view of the man.


In short Mohammed was a precursor of Hitler.


His career and his program carried through on the 10 main principles we can see when observing a pagan-fascism – be it Marxist-Communism; Hitlerism or Mohammedanism. Keep in mind the medieval Christians were a lot smarter than the moderns who exist in our post-modern utopia today. They called the cult of Mohammed, Mohammedanism, i.e. the cult of its leader. They did not ascribe the word submission or Islam to the cult. Rather interesting.


The key underlying elements of any pagan cult and associated intolerant fascism – as given by Paxton and many others – is the following:


1.Leader and elite control.

2.Ideology as propaganda not reality

3.Cult pretending to be divinely inspired.

4.Terror and control.


6.Cross-Class appeal.

7.Economic Autarchy.

8.Hatred of individualism and liberalism.

9.Jihadic War and domination.

10.Rigidity and inevitable collapse.


Fascisms are always doomed to failure. The crass ignorance and rejection of reality, its hatred of anything to do with modernity, and the stupefying ritualisation, propaganda, terrorist methods, and brute force, all kills the juridical and moral person in its followers. When that occurs the paganism, if confronted by military force, will evaporate. A lesson that most of the Marxist-liberal establishment and the plump, well-fed denizens of happy Europe, Canada and elsewhere, fail to understand.


So, what did Mohammed do in his eventful life, which so changed the world and has led us, with wailing Marxists and internationalists in tow, into a war with the fascistic elements of Mohammedanism? Like Hitler he created a political-military machine, unified by a pagan cult, supposedly divinely inspired.


Hitler, an Atheist who hated Christians and the Church (Christ and Paul were Jews, Christianity destroyed the maculine Teutonic culture etc), chattered that God had sent him to preserve Europe against the Jewish Bolshevist revolutionaries. Indeed, in his propaganda appeal to Britons, Hitler constantly used this theme to try to win a British alliance. Mohammed was less nuanced. He took Judaism, the ideals of monotheism and fastened them onto the reigning cult of the moon at Mecca – al-ilah or Allah – pronouncing it the successor to all previous religions. Since Jews and Christians were prevalent in Arabia at this time, it is obvious he was trying to unify the illiterate Bedouins to confront and then eject the Jewish-Christian competitors and steal their riches. Monotheism in the eyes of the political Mohammed seemed a very powerful tool indeed.


Seeing disarray and foreign control of trade and riches, Mohammed cleverly devised a competing program and a compelling commentary to unite the various Arab tribes under his leadership. Like Hitler's Nazis Mohammed would use force; the promise of economic bounty; and spirituality, to achieve his aims. Since all of Arabia worshipped some form of al-ilah or the Moon deity, and all Arabs prayed to rocks; the use of Allah would be an inspired and intelligent means to appeal across classes, tribes and regions to obtain spiritual support for his program.


Inspired by his divine dreams and religious spirit, Mohammad through peaceful means had converted about 70 people in Mecca by 622 AD to his concept of Islam [submission to Allah]. He was however driven out of Mecca by those who saw his new theology as a threat to the city’s current paganism. After fleeing to Medina Mohammad rejected peaceful methods and turned to violence. Al Dashti, an Iranian Muslim and scholar of Islam states, ‘After the move to Medina….he became a relentless warrior, intent on spreading his religion by the sword, and a scheming founder of a state.’


For Mohammad war was the means to build his own powerful state. Islam is not a religion but a state construct using paganism fused with monotheism as its unifying culture. Using the Medinians and their men, Mohammad made war upon Mecca finally defeating the Meccans in 624 AD at the battle of Badr. This battle was not an overwhelming victory of course.  Only 300 Muslims fought 800 Meccans, and less than 100 men were killed or injured.  The importance of the battle for Muslims was that they were not defeated, and that Mohammed's claim that Al-Allah intervened with forces of angels to disperse the Meccans, might be a plausible explanation as to why a force 2.5 times smaller than its foe, was able to stand its ground and fend off what should have been a defeat.  Badr confirmed Mohammed, his mission and his faith in the Meccan moon deity, Al-Allah, which was conveniently, his family's personal deity, and one that his relations took care of in the Kabaa shrine - the economic and spiritual center of pagan, celestial-worshipping, Arabia.


At this crucial battle in which Mohammad gained control of local Meccan and Medina area tribes he, ‘took a handful of gravel when the battle was extremely heated [and] threw it at the faces of the pagans saying 'May Your faces be disfigured.'  He also fought in the battle - he would have had to, all leaders in the pre-modern world, led their men from the front. If a leader did not show personal valour, strength, or courage, he would lose all credibility with his troops.  This battle and Mohammad’s violence during laid the foundation of the Islamic State and made the Muslims a terrifying force of gangsters and opportunists. Islam was built in the fires and blood of war – not in peace and charity. Its ethos is imbued with this martial spirit. After winning the battle of Badr Mohammad and his men spent 3 days killing the prisoners. Then with the Meccan and Medinian tribes under his control he ordered the spread of Islam and its empire by sword, as well as the eradication of his former Jewish allies in Medina and beyond.


Ironically some Jews originally supported Mohammed. But this did not prevent the virulent anti-semiticism which imbues Islamic thought from forming. Indeed, Mohammed and his followers beheaded 700 Jewish men of the Khuraysh tribe after conquering its stronghold as a reprisal for endeavouring to aid a Meccan army, which failed to conquer Medina.  The women were taken as sex slaves, and Jewish assets, money and property was divided between the followers of the moon cult - with Mohammed taking the fairest of the women, and the largest share of the booty.  Hating the Jew is of course one of the great unifying themes of the Koran, Islamic history and Muslim imperialism.  The mothers and daughters were taken as sex slaves or sold off.


From these early military victories, the Mohammedans, swept across Arabia and beyond, fuelled by their absolute paganism [one word, one Allah, one Mohammad, in imitation of Hitler`s one people, one state, one leader], which created an esprit de corps and ruthlessness that other tribes and cities could not withstand.


University of Chicago professor Fred Donner, in his book ‘The Early Islamic Conquests’, theorizes that there may be something intrinsic to Islam that spurs a conquering attitude: "[T]here is the possibility that the ideological message of Islam itself filled some or all of the ruling elite with the notion that they had an essentially religious duty to expand the political domain of the Islamic state as far as practically possible; that is, the elite may have organized the Islamic conquest movement because they saw it as their divinely ordained mission to do so."


Mohammed was a fascist in the true sense of the word. A fascistic mind is one which desires to destroy the individual and place the person, inside a communal cult, where his life is ritualized and managed, for the benefit of the cult and its leadership. Fascist personalities thus neuter the moral, juridical, spiritual, and rational mind of their followers.  They create fantasies to justify their deeds [like the Koran].  They isolate and demonize an 'enemy' [the Jew, the infidel, the Hindu etc.].


They establish strict and severe laws which must be followed or the person will be subjected to punishment or perhaps death.  Police systems are created to ensure compliance [Gestaop, NKVD, KGB, 'Religious' Police].  The fascistic mind and his cult engages in murder, deceit, theft and destruction of any centers of opposition - and justifies it with myths and 'divine' liturgy, approval, or some magical 'dialecticism', which can be seen only by the leaders of the cult, who have god-given inspirational powers of intellect and understanding.


The fascist mind manufactures a system which needs to expand to keep the various competing parties and sects unified. War is thus the natural expression of a fascism - unending war be it for lebensraum; a class-less 'world' society; or to spread the Umma to all parts of the globe. The fascistic mind and its created cult demands submission of everyone to its paganism, and its ruthless regime.  All of this aptly sums up Islam and Mohammed.


Mohammed was an anti-Semite who killed with his own hands. He raped a 9-year-old girl. He led 80 odd military expeditions. He raided, warred, and stole gold, land, women, slaves and property.  He was violent, lecherous, spiteful, adulterous, and conniving. He was also like Hitler, and to a lesser extent Stalin, probably quite mad. Much of the Koran is simply an embarrassment of jabbering stupidity.


Mohammad had revelations which can be read in the gibberish that makes up the Koran including: sanctioning highway robbery; raiding and killing during Ramadan the pagan Arab month in which all war was suspended in lieu of farming, trade and prayer; favoring war against unbelievers [until there was no religion other than Allah’s]; promising paradise and 72 nubile virgins in return for those killed in jihad; Allah’s approval of his taking 20 % of all booty captured in war, [100 % in peace]; Allah consenting to his having sex with a 9 year old girl; Allah’s support in practicing adultery and polygamy [even with married women]; Allah’s agreement in destroying Jewish and Christian villages and trade caravans; Allah’s permission to engage in slave trading. Many more malicious revelations could be listed but the above are some examples of ‘divine’ revelations that Allah [Arabic word meaning the moon], gave unto Mohammad.


Isn't the above directly derived from a mentality which is distorted, and which wants to pervert and invert the real world of the 5 senses?  Is this not the great exemplar of fascism?


As one would expect when dealing with a deranged politician, revelations would miraculously occur when Mohammad wanted something or needed to distance himself from crimes past or current. Any sane person listening to such nonsense would declare the speaker insane. Hitler and Lenin were obviously mad men. We can add Mohammed to that group.


Modern day apologists and mainstream-media and political ‘experts’ really do need to perform some primary research on Mohammad before pronouncing that Islam is holy and peaceful. For my part I put much more faith in minds such as that possessed by Alexis de Tocqueville, the 19th century American interpreter and political scientist par excellence, then in modern day liberal media personalities; “I studied the Koran a great deal…..few religions in the world as deadly to men as that of Muhammad. As far as I can see, it is the principal cause of the decadence so visible today in the Muslim world, and though less absurd than the polytheism of old, its social and political tendencies are in my opinion infinitely more to be feared, and I therefore regard it as a form of decadence rather than a form of progress in relation to paganism itself.”


No doubt about it.


But don`t worry no one today will say it. For the multi-cult losers, Mohammed and his fascist moon cult are simply peace, brotherhood, fun-times and grinning 'moderation'.



The myth of the Moderate Muslim

Rewrite the Koran, reform Islamic theology, separate church from state.....

Bookmark and Share


Keeping up with Muslim New-speak is very difficult. Muslims are masters at propaganda – with the Saudi's the master black magicians of the art of deception.  Iranian propaganda money also saturates Western institutions.  Every event or conflict involving the followers of the male Meccan moon deity and Mohammedanism is recast by the Muslims as a struggle between 'faith' and bigotry, [Islam and Western civilization]; 'enlightenment' and ignorance; or cultural freedom and oppression [Muslims vs. The Rest]. In Western society the ability of Muslims to use New-speak is astounding. What is insane is the acceptance of such nonsense by academia, politicians and the fake news media.


Muslim newspeak in North America and Europe is controlled by various Muslim groups who purport to speak for millions of Muslims resident in the West.  Examples are CAIR, ISNA or the MSA.  These groups are largely funded by the Saudis, Iranians or terror organisations. FBI and other investigations reveal that the linkages between 'moderate' Muslim groups and Islamo-fascist and radical organisations are legion and deep.


Western domiciled Muslims constantly whine about being 'targets' of 'white' 'racism.  The Muhammadan cult is of course, not a ‘race’ so racism cannot be the issue when discussing the cult itself, composed as it is of Arabs, Indians, Blacks, Whites and Asians. Islam as a movement, is a clearly a political-ideology of power and control. Any cursory reading of Islamic history and the Koran would dispel the notion that Islam is a faith.


Typical Moslem justifications for any act of Islamic terror would include the following Newspeak dupes:


-Not all Muslims are terrorists

-Islam is 'reacting' against Western aggression

-Muslims are largely peaceful and charitable

-Most Muslims are 'moderate'

-This was due to mental illness or misunderstanding Mein Koran

-Drugs and alcohol were involved

-‘Racism’ prompted this violent action

-This is an 'isolated' case

-'They' are not real Muslims

-The welfare state is insufficiently generous and solicitous of Muslims and this creates aggravation and resentment


The same list could have been used to justify Hitlerism; Stalinism; and Chinese Maoist fascism, and dozens of other fascisms so coveted and caressed by leftists and multi-culturalists. Not all Shinto Japanese in 1941 were anti-Western or as extremist as the military junta. Nazis were comprised of peaceful teachers, scientists, soccer players, actors and businessmen who were not as 'extreme' as Goering or Hitler. Russian grandmothers in 1970 had little inclination to world domination or the overthrow of American democracy. Chinese entrepreneurs today, are probably uninterested in invading Taiwan, overturning US elections, or working with the US deep state to embed socialist-communism in the USA.  Ergo I would expect that most Muslims living in the West are not 'the same' as the 'radicals', evident and so active over 1400 years of Islamic imperialism and Jihad.


So what. It is the theology of the cult which matters. Not the individual. This is especially true if the individual does nothing to reform the cult, its documents, its rituals, and its expectations. Thus the singular 'moderate' Muslim who tells you what you want to hear, and appears pious, plays the piano, dresses well and appears civilized, is hardly important in the grand scheme of his cult. If he is not determined to rewrite the Koran, reform the Hadiths, open up Islam to inquiry and even ridicule, then he too is part of the problem.


Since 9-11 there have been 40.000 Muslim attacks across the world. Slavery still goes on, even within the West, in the sex trading for marriage of young girls. I know because I have met some of these victims.  Moslems, Arabs and Blacks own, today, right now, some 5-10 million Black slaves in Africa.  Hindu girls in their thousands in East India have disappeared, taken as prisoners by Muslim Bangladeshis, raped, and forced to join Islam [to produce male Ghazi or Muslim warriors]. Attacks and racism against Jews and Christians are weekly events across the world. Yet not one single Muslim demonstration by these vaunted moderates has taken place anywhere in the Western world since 9-11. Not a single one.


Yet we are assured, 'all' Muslims are 'moderates'. Muslims are establishing radicalized schools all across the Western world teaching pure Islamic doctrine, which is by itself anti-Western, racist and supremacist. The media and politicians describe these schools as 'moderate'. In Europe every large city has more than a dozen of them, many funded by both Saudi-Wahabbi money, and state money. Many have deep connections to various Islamic-fascist groups overseas. In fact, the number of Muslim organisations and schools with connections to 'radical' Islam within the West are now are almost too many to count. Thirty years ago, there was only a handful. Yes, there is a Moslem tide, an invasion, a takeover of Western urban areas.  London UK currently has 500 mosques, implying a total Muslim population of 2.5 million, in a city of 10 million.  30 years ago, the Muslim presence in London was minimal. 


There is no proof that 'moderate' Muslim groups exist and if they do, they are poor, under-funded, under-manned, and largely silenced. Blasphemy rules apply in Islam.  You cannot criticise Muhammad, Mein Koran or Islamic theology.  The penalty is death. 


Moderate Islam might be what the 'mass' of Muslims desire, but there is precious little proof that this 'mainstream' Islam wants anything else other than more power, more state funding; more mosques; more adherents and widespread Koranic practice embedded in Sharia Law. Nothing is more obviously a threat to Western civilisation than the imposition of a totalitarian creed premised on pre-7th century codes which are not even laws in the modern sense; designed to meld together, church and state. Nothing is moderate about such a construction.


The only moderate Muslim is one who will agree to rewrite the Koran, the Hadiths and open up Islam to inquiry, ridicule and reformation and separate the church from the state. That is the only definition of a moderate Muslim. Period.