French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was  superior to anything Islam had developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions.  Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'.  Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.   

Archive - February 2022

Christophobia in Mein Koran, Sura 5 as an example

Christianity condemned.

Bookmark and Share

 

 

An example of Muslim Christophobia being ‘baked in’ the Koran, is Sura 5 or 'The Table Spread' which is a long, odious, clanging tirade against Non-Moslems. In fact, some 22-25 verses condemn Christianity out of 120. This is approximately 20%. Remember this is the first or second-most important stream of Allah-inspired thought given by Muhammad, Islam and indeed the world's most important human in history. The Christians are clearly cursed in this Sura by a 'superior' Moslem sect which has the blessings of this Allah-thing. The crescendo of hatred towards the Christian is reached in verse 33:

 

5:33 “The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter.”

 

This is pretty clear. Verse 33 follows about 20 verses which rage against the 'People of the Book' as being criminals who rejected the true word of the Allah thing. The Moslem hatred of the Christian is affirmed in the following hate-speech:

 

51. O you who believe ! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: they are but friends and protectors to each other.

 

This is pretty clear – the Jews and their Christian allies are enemies. There is no verse of love or compassion for either group, anywhere in this Sura.

 

78. Curses were pronounced on those among the Children of Israel who rejected Faith, by the tongue of David and of Jesus the son of Mary: because they disobeyed and persisted in Excesses.

 

Note: This piece of propaganda would have impressed the Nazis. Muslims are superior to the other 'Peoples of the Book' because they contravened the Covenants and the words of their Prophets and engaged in 'Excesses'. No details are given by Mohammed or the writers of the Koran, of these transgressions. Just a multitude of repetitive propaganda – the Jews and Christians defied their Prophets who were apparently Al-Lah worshippers some 600-2600 years before the Al-Lah cult of Muhammad was invented, behaved badly, rejected the true faith of the moon idol, and therefore are destined to be superseded, punished and destroyed by Islam.

 

This is nothing more than insane, rambling, ravings – supported by more screaming in verses 79, 80, 81, 82 and 86 – to name just a few.

 

Humiliating and killing them is the climax of this rage. Here we see yet again the Moslem lie that Allah is the same as the Christian God when in fact the 'one', the Al Lah or Allah, was Hub'Al a moon deity whose rites and rituals were likely formed through the practices of Assyro-Babylonian culture mixed with local Arab practices. Since Jesus or Issu was really a Moslem, the rejection by Christians of the Allah's true 'word' and the embracing of polytheism as denoted in the worship of the Trinity, mark out Christians as evil, criminal, unclean, wayward, and dangerous.

 

There is not one single expression in this supremacist chapter on tolerance, humility, acceptance, co-existence, love or gratitude, nor of the Golden Rule. Islam rules. Anyone who 'fights' against this 'fact' must be killed or at the very least dominated and humbled. This is not a religion but a cult. Any objective analysis makes this plain.

Koranic Hate Speech against Christians - Sura 5 as an example

Christophobia runs deep in the cult of Muhammad.

Bookmark and Share

Al Qaeda-linked jihadists accused of hanging victims on ... 

 

Islam's Christianophobia runs deep in the Koran. One of the most important Suras is Sura 5 or The Table Spread.  The table is spread for Muslims and Muslims only, containing all the food, delights and merriment that a full table confers upon the chosen and supreme of the Al Lah-Muhammad cult.  Sura 5 has 120 verses and 25% are excitedly Christophobic or Christianophobic. 

 

Much of this disjointed chapter is concerned with Bronze and Iron age laws, which one would find in the historical records of Bronze Age Babylonia, or Iron-Age Judea. This primitive 'law giving' is suffused by long rants against Jews and Christians. Within this dichotomy of law-giving, 3 Muslim 'virtues' are clearly defined.  These are the important ‘tenets’ or categories which describe a ‘good’ Muslim, a member of Muhammad’s cult who follows the Koran, and Koranic ‘law’.   The Muslim ‘virtues’ given in Sura 5 are:

 

First, a good Muslim must never accept Christians as friends (you may lie, deceive them into thinking you are friends but privately, you cannot accept them as equals or friends in any way).

 

Second, you must blindly follow and completely accept, whatever Muhammad has said or done.

 

Third kill, in the name of Jihad, you are ordered to execute or crucify the Jews and Christians.

 

Verses 05-010 and 05-035 sum up Sura 5 nicely. Moslems must engage in fighting against the Christians, and all Christians are doomed to Hellfire:

 

URL 005:035

O you who believe! Do your duty to Allah and fear Him. Seek the means of approach to Him, and strive hard in His Cause as much as you can. So that you may be successful.

 

005:010
URL

They who disbelieve and deny our Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) are those who will be the dwellers of the Hellfire.

 

Sure 5:32, often quoted by Moslemophiles due to its sentence fragment (below) ‘if anyone saved a life, it would be if he saved the life of all mankind’, is an injunction for Muslims not to kill each other and the phrase ‘saving the life of all mankind’ clearly denotes that in-toto, mankind must be Moslem, to ‘be saved’. Moslems are forbidden to kill another Moslem but they can certainly murder, destroy or crucify Christians [5:33]:

 

005:032
URL

Because of that We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone killed a person not in retaliation of murder, or (and) to spread mischief in the land - it would be as if he killed all mankind, and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all mankind. And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with clear proofs, evidences, and signs, even then after that many of them continued to exceed the limits (e.g. by doing oppression unjustly and exceeding beyond the limits set by Allah by committing the major sins) in the land!.

005:033
URL

The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

 

Waging 'war' against Muhammadanism, simply means not accepting Koranic doctrine, or the supremacy of Muhammad and the Al Lah moon idol (Baal).  Waging 'war' is simply disbelief in any of the total-tenets espoused by Muhammadanism.  Blasphemy is punishable  by death, as is the mere questioning of anything Muhammad said or did.

 

The animus to Christians extends beyond the above and Jihad, to all of civil society.  Muslims may be forced to live with Christians, but a ‘good’ Muslim cannot take Christians as friends (certainly never as equals):

 

005:051
URL

O you who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians as Auliya' (friends, protectors, helpers, etc.), they are but Auliya' to one another. And if any amongst you takes them as Auliya', then surely he is one of them. Verily, Allah guides not those people who are the Zalimun (polytheists and wrongdoers and unjust).

 

005:033
URL

The recompense of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and do mischief in the land is only that they shall be killed or crucified or their hands and their feet be cut off on the opposite sides, or be exiled from the land. That is their disgrace in this world, and a great torment is theirs in the Hereafter.

 

Friendship is impossible with the Trinity worshipping Christians (hence pagan in the eyes of Muslims), who are linked to Judaism.  Both ‘People of the Book’ have rejected the 'path' (05-15).  In Koranic theology, Muhammad negates Christ (05-46, 05-65) and Mother Mary was actually a pious Muslim (05-75). Allah negates the Christian father or God. The Christian Trinity is a polytheist blasphemy.

 

Verse 5:14 condemns Christians for rejecting the Al Lah or Baal the moon idol of Mecca.  Blasphemy is punishable by death in Koranic-Muhammadan ‘law’.

 

005:014
URL

And from those who call themselves Christians, We took their covenant, but they have abandoned a good part of the Message that was sent to them. So We planted amongst them enmity and hatred till the Day of Resurrection (when they discarded Allah's Book, disobeyed Allah's Messengers and His Orders and transgressed beyond bounds in Allah's disobedience), and Allah will inform them of what they used to do.

 

Verse 5:73 clearly expresses that the Christian Trinity is a false and blasphemous or criminal belief:

 

005:073
URL

Surely, disbelievers are those who said: "Allah is the third of the three (in a Trinity)." But there is no ilah (god) (none who has the right to be worshipped) but One Ilah (God -Allah). And if they cease not from what they say, verily, a painful torment will befall the disbelievers among them.

 

Christians are nothing but slaves of Allah [5:118], as was their leader Christ.

 

Muslims must war against the followers of Christs, because in the modern parlance, the Christians are ‘extremists’, transgressing the known ‘laws’ of Al Lah-Muhammad and engaged in acts of evil:

 

005:077
URL

Say (O Muhammad SAW): "O people of the Scripture (Jews and Christians)! Exceed not the limits in your religion (by believing in something) other than the truth, and do not follow the vain desires of people who went astray in times gone by, and who misled many, and strayed (themselves) from the Right Path."

005:078
URL

Those among the Children of Israel who disbelieved were cursed by the tongue of Dawud (David) and 'Iesa (Jesus), son of Maryam (Mary). That was because they disobeyed (Allah and the Messengers) and were ever transgressing beyond bounds.

005:079
URL

They used not to forbid one another from the Munkar (wrong, evildoing, sins, polytheism, disbelief, etc.) which they committed. Vile indeed was what they used to do.

 

Due to these 'transgressions' and most importantly for the cult of Islam, Christians can be killed, executed or crucified for spreading ‘polytheism’ or ‘disbelief’.

 

Sura 5 is simply an atavistic, vicious, ruthless, bloody, totalitarian, and totally intolerant screed of Christophobia.  It advocates the killing of Christians and tries to marginalize all Christian belief including the Trinity, the virgin birth, the crucifixion of Christ and the Risen. It supplants Christ with Muhammad and the Christian Father with Allah. It demands that Moslems attack and murder Christians until they become good slaves of Allah. The Koran is presented as the only 'truth', one which supersedes the Gospels, and which mandates blind devotion.

 

The Rise of Western Christendom, by Peter Brown (and the entry of Islam)

Triumph and Diversity, 200 A.D. – 1000 A.D.

Bookmark and Share

 

The Rise of Western Christendom: Triumph and Diversity, A ...

 

The Christianisation of Europe and large parts of Asia and Africa is accepted as a fait accompli, an inevitability, an unstoppable trend.  As Peter Brown’s very large, comprehensive, and dense book, which is fantastically written, and which illumines the opacity of the late ancient world, clearly presents, this was far from true.  The ‘geographical spread’ of Christianity, to quote Brown, is astonishing in itself.  The cultural adaptation across lands and societies is simply remarkable and an untold tale.  How did it happen?  Why did it happen? 

 

This triumphant diversity and even tolerance of the pagan and non-Christian is an important reason why the religion was able to spread and conquer previous cults and paganisms.  As Brown states, ‘What we now call a distinctively European Christianity was unthinkable in the year 500 A.D.  Even the notion of Europe itself only took on its modern meaning in around the year 650 A.D.  By the year 1000 A.D., what could be called a European Christianity had only recentl been established, with the conversion of Germany, of parts of Eastern Europe, and of Scandinavia.’  Christianity adapted, proved itself morally and socially superior, subsumed and conquered the literally hundreds of existing paganisms.  As Brown relates, every region presents a different story.  Western Christendom has a very distinct history than its brethren in Near Eastern lands, or further afield in Central Asia, and Western China.  How did a small Christian sect, numbering a few score in 35 A.D. manage to organise, coalesce and conquer Europe and huge swathes of Africa and Asia? 

 

Christian ‘Europe’ reaches far back into the past.  It is built on and is infused by millennia of pagan beliefs.  Socio-religious narratives, the immaterial, discussions over the soul, purgatory and hell, have deep antecedents in pagan culture and philosophy.  Cultural mores and beliefs would have greatly impacted all Christian practices and beliefs.  Christianity cannot be neatly divorced or disconnected from the age-old beliefs and certainties of the societies it entered, comingled with and eventually dominated.  This is why Christianity can look quite different depending on what region or area one investigates. 

 

As Brown states, ‘the warring Christian churches of Asia and Africa turned the Middle East into a vast echo chamber, resounding with lively conversations.  The literature of every church was characterised by debates with real or imagine rivals….it was the cyber highway of the age….The men who contributed…cared deeply about education.  Based in the city of Nisibis…Nestorian Christians…created an entire new system of Christian schooling…They also cared about the Greco-Roman past.’  Plato is clearly found within St. Augustine and neo-Platonic discussions on the soul and the immaterial world beyond the living.  Aristotle infused naturalism and Scholasticism.  Roman literature was analysed and discussed.  There was a continuity within the Mediterranean world from 200 A.D. to 1000 A.D in which Christian ideals were blended with Greco-Roman.  Civilisation continued and was improved.

 

Then when we the entry of Islam.  As Brown writes:  ‘The roots of Islam lay in an Arabian peninsula that was by no means a bleak and isolated desert.  The Hijaz, in which…Muhammad received his message, was part of great echo chamber of religious ideas that had developed throughout the Middle East in the late sixth and early seventh centuries.  We have also realised the zet with which the earl Muslims appropriated and adapted the artistic and technical skills of the regions which they conquered.’ 

 

If one reads the Koran, you will see that it is a purloined, and incorrect appropriation of Jewish and Christian canonical texts.  It is also quite pagan, given that the Al Lah of Mecca is Baal who is a moon deity, a common cult in the Near East.  What Muhamamd did was combine the aspects of miraculous and divinely sanctioned mono-theism with existing Meccan Al Lah worship.  The ‘echo chambers’ of articulated and emotional Christian argumentation would have been carried along the trade routes from the Levant to Christian communities in Arabia.  Muhammad was a caravan owner and would have encountered these lively debates and ideas.

 

As Brown recounts, the Muslims defined themselves in opposition to the Christians.  This led to two ideals within Islam.  The first was related to the ascetic, retired Monk, who denied the world and devoted himself (or herself in the case of Nuns), to God.  There are no communities of Nuns or Monks in Islam.  The second was more prominent and important, namely the ethos of the warrior Jihadi and soldier for Muhammad and the Al Lah of Mecca. 

 

“The Muslim idealisation of death on the battlefield…arrived at through a conscious wish on the part of Muslims to define themselves against non-Muslims – especially against Christians…..What they found was a hard doctrine.  The notion of Jihad repelled Jews and Christians.  Ever since, it has played a major role in the negative image of Islam.”

 

Jihad was the Muslim ethos of choice.  It was not just to ‘oppose’ Christian monasticism and ideological ferment, which is what Brown offers.  Jihad was practical.  Muhammad needed men to conquer, and the allure of booty, women, and land was paramount.  Muhammad was no prophet, but an empire builder.  Monotheism and the vanquishing of all pagan idols bar the Al Lah or moon deity was paramount for unification of diverse tribes and clans.  The Christian and Jewish communities in Arabia and beyond were wealthy and advanced in comparison to the penury of most Arab pagans.  The 7th century Jihad against Christianity in Arabia and beyond by the cult of Muhammad, has parallels with the Viking onslaughts against Britain and northern France in the 9th century.  Riches, an advanced and prosperous civilisation, sex slavery and pillage were the inspirational objectives of the Al Lah cult and Muhammad.  You need to pay brigands, gangs and mercenaries.  The spoils of war (to quote a Koranic chapter heading) is how you accomplish this.  The theological foundation of Muhammadanism was war and subservience to Al Lah and Muhammad. 

 

Why is Islam a religion?

Lots of similarities with the intolerance of the Corona Religion.

Bookmark and Share

 

Imagine that you have travelled to another location to attend to personal affairs. You step off a train in some locale, take your bags and proceed to your destination. You walk a few paces to find some transport. Then the reality of ideological contamination assaults you.

 

A man confronts you face to face and screams at you in another language. His face contorted with hate, almost touches yours, the neck veins are throbbing, his temples are bursting, his hair is flying and with fist pumping theatrics he spits in your face and walks away. Thus, battered and a little terrified, you find a taxi and inquire nervously to the driver what just happened. He replies, ‘oh that was a man of religion and peace warning you to leave and that infidels are not wanted here.’ How ironic. Confused you touch your attaché bag full of charity money that you are donating to the local hospital as a gift from Christians in your own country to this desolate backwater and wonder what you are doing in this location.

 

Not all people who believe in various ideologies are fanatics of course. Not all Christians for instance are charitable or good. Many ‘militant’ Christians are may be dangerous in a few ways. Yet I have never been able to satisfactorily find in any writings; webzines; punditry; or resource why Islam is named as a ‘religion’. It is a mystifying myth that confuses the central issue of our times – that of defending civilization against what I would term is nothing more than barbaric paganism.

 

Why is Islam a religion? If Islam is a religion, why isn’t Corona ? After all the Corona-oligists have named the corrupt criminal head of the US CDC, Anthony Fauci, as the Pope of Science, though precious little science can be found anywhere in the Corona cult.  Fauci regularly screams and shrieks that of course he and the CDC-Corona cult is ‘the’ science, vaccinations, which have only injured and killed historically (there is not a single independent source of proof of any efficacy from any period of history for any serum, ever), are safe and effective and essential to survival.  Pharmaceutical firms, the media and governmental establishment repeat this gospel.  The immune system is now anti-science, and there is only ‘one’ approach to viral infections, that at the end of a dirty needle ejecting poisons, metals and biological debris. 

 

As with Corona, Islam is of course not monolithic. Sunnism, Shiaism, Salafism and many other subgroups all have different sects, beliefs, and degrees of commitment. Yet the central fact remains that the Koran, the Hadiths [supplements explaining what Mohammed really meant in the Koran] and Sharia Law [the legal code which enforces Koranic doctrine], are the foundations of Islamic life. There might be differences between the subgroups and sects on the literal interpretation of various parts of the trinity of the Islamic ideology, but all Muslims believe that civil, political and religious society is subservient to the Koran, Hadiths and Sharia Law.

 

Islam like Corona, Hitlerite paganism, or the fascist tenets that inform Russian or Chinese exceptionalism exemplified in Communist doctrine, is the opposite of Christianity. Paganisms elevate the leader, the cult, the universality of the program, and the destruction of individuality, responsibility, and the meaning of life. Paganisms prefer death; a violent reordering of reality and the imposition of slavery to the ideology, in place of the world of the six senses, freedom and the celebration of life.

 

In the Christian world, Caesar can take what is his; and you shall keep what is yours including your own personal system of faith. Charity, aid, recognition that slavery is wrong, females are equal, that good acts transcend this world, and that character and honour matter – all this and more comes from Christianity. Many parts of Christian history can be criticized, and many acts of bloody violence emanated from religious hatred. But the underlying reality is that the faith and mental code that informs Christianity shaped, and is a vital part of, civilization.

 

What does Islam teach? The Koran is full of hate and bile against Jews and Christians. The Koran supported by the Hadiths loudly proclaims that all of mankind must be Muslim. The leaders of Islam for the past 1400 years have stated, with unrelenting fanaticism, that their ideology will dominate the world. A wide swathe of Islamic populations, perhaps 25 % or more, has no regard for other ideas, cultures, or even life itself. This is evidenced by the daily butchering in Iraq and elsewhere as Muslims kill other Muslim innocents for various reasons including revenge killings; murdering those who help the infidel; lusting for power; or destroying those who are less fundamentalist. What you see in Baghdad is the clear expression of a paganism with no regard for life, for innocents or for civilization.

 

Why then is Islam still declared a religion?

Because it screams in your face that it is. Because it builds temples on top of buildings and sites from other more advanced cultures. Because Muslims threaten you if you dare question their religiosity. Because they strut with ignorant pride in collective self-madness assured that they will dominate lesser beings. Because like Pope Fauci and Corona, and the cult of Globalists, they assault you if you dare question their sanity, their made up fiction presented as science, or the reality that their doctrines kill, injure, destroy.

 

Culture is King. If you want to understand the culture of an ideology, or the culture of society at large look at its leadership, review the personality of its founders and analyse their ‘great men and women’. The American Constitution was premised on ideas from John Locke and the ancient Stoics. Jefferson’s holy trinity [life liberty and the pursuit of happiness], is rooted in Christianity, the Western Enlightenment and the English liberal tradition.

 

Now look at Islam.

Mohammad was the exact converse of Christ. Mohammad was an illiterate who killed; murdered; raped; engaged in connubial and lascivious sex; stole; plundered; and engaged in war to spread his political control. Christ did none of these things. Mohammed took a 3000-year-old moon-cult, added some monotheistic inventions he took from the Jews and Christians and proclaimed it holy and good. He in effect invented a political ideology and said it was the natural successor to the Christian state and only he could interpret Ali-lah’s [moon cult deity] word.

 

Read about the 1400-year jihad against any and all cultures. Arabs, Turks, and Muslims have warred and destroyed civilizations ranging from black Africa to white Europe, to the Buddhists and Hindus in India. 30 million blacks were sold into slavery [vs. 10 million shipped to the ‘new world’]; 25 million or more whites were used as chattel in Muslim empires; and about 30 million Hindus and Buddhists were killed by marauding Muslim armies. This perpetual war, hate, acrimony and pagan fanaticism has never been equaled in the history of man.

 

Yet Islam is revered as a ‘religion’. I would like the media, the politicians and the Islamic elite to explain why we should take seriously this idea that Islam is a religion. Was Hitlerism a religion too? It is not enough to scream and spit in my face and threaten me for asking this question. Maybe outlining why others should respect an obscenely violent and pagan cult from Arabia as a religion, would be a good starting point at dialogue to help defuse Islamic violence.

 

Then again Muslims have historically never proven themselves adept at rational discourse. Neither were the Corona cultists, the socialist Nazis or the Communists – those other favourites of our media elite.

 

Bishop Fauci, Apostle Gates and the Church of Corona, show that much similarity exists between the atavistic, pagan hate of humans, real science, and medicine and Muhammad’s not-so-original cult of Mecca, which pre-existed Muhammad by millennia.  Irrationality, lies, violence, death, deceit, hate, the demarcation of the world into ‘us and them’, saturate both cults.