Holy Koran! Suras 83-114 'The plagiarized Kabaa poems'

Mixed with the usual Infidelophobia!

Monday, April 10, 2017 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

Consider this hate speech and vitriol against Jews and Christians who are called Abu Jahl (disbelievers) and Al Mushrikun (criminals), in Mein Koran:

 

 

These themes saturate and inform Muhammad’s cult document.  Jews and Christians are satanic enemies, who must be destroyed and who will in any event, be tormented by Baal the moon deity, who is the Al Lah (Lord) of Mecca.

 

It is well known that the smaller Suras, compiled during the early phase of Muhammad's cult, were culled and plagiarized from the Kabaa shrine. These verses are later re-assembled and infused with the usual litany of Koranic-Muhammadan intolerance towards non-Moslems. It is worthwhile to note two obvious facts.

 

First, Muhammad's attempt at gang organization in Mecca, disguised as social 'reform' and concern for the 'poor', was a remarkable failure. He was deemed to be a social agitator, hungry for power, illiterate, quite stupid and probably insane. The Meccan elite had little patience for a man who was condemning Arab pagan theology, and distorting if not obstructing trade and money which flowed to the Meccan shrines from pilgrims and the pagan faithful. Instead of killing him for generating social turbulence the Meccans exiled him to Yathrib or Medina. A fateful mistake of course.

 

Second, Muhammad's lack of education, erudition and even innovative ideas is reflected by his plagiarism of both pagan Arab poems and ideas; and of Judeo-Christian tenets which he had picked up as a simple caravan trader in Syria. Nothing Muhammad said or uttered was new or ethical. Most saw through his thin veneer of 'social concern' to discern a brigand, a thug and a political-military adventurer, one who would lead armies, butcher men with his own hands, slaughter Jews, Christians and pagans, and engage in lurid sex trafficking and the establishment of a personal harem – all the while bathing in stolen gold and luxuries, and taxes for his Meccan cult centred around Hub'Al, the Lord, or the Al-Lah.

 

The moon idol, Al-Lah did not create the Koran. Muhammad and later generations of Arabs and Moslems did, each with a self-interested purpose. The Hadiths for example were largely compiled by the Abbasids during a civil war in the 9th century, some 200 years after the founder of Submission had been murdered by his own men.

 

Of particular import to Moslem and Arab culture is the random violence against non-cult members. The Koran is a merger of pagan Arab mores with Muhammad's intolerance. In the last 21 smaller verses of the cult document, there are 388 verses. Only 109 verses or 28%preach hate speech against the Infidel. Only a cult document would contain such lurid hatred against Unbelievers. Examples of hate speech verses from Sura 83 to 114 are:

 

 

 

The themes are simple-minded, fantastic, cultish and quite repetitive:

   1 ) Infidels are evil, greedy, stupid, ignorant and linked with Satan. They can be killed. Many verses above reference individuals that Muhammad murdered, justifying their deaths by the tautological claim that they were Unbelievers, or that they mocked or criticized Muhammad.

   2 )  Muhammad must be obeyed since the Al-Lah idol has designated Muhammad to be the most important human ever. Not to follow in-toto, Muhammad's diktat is a 'sin' perpetrated by 'criminals. 

   3 ) Al-Lah is the only free-will force in the entire universe. Humans only have the 'free will' to follow what he wants them to follow. 

   4)  All Infidels including those importunate enough even to question Al-Lah [aka Muhammad] will be tortured in Hell-fire on Judgement Day. 

   5 ) Islam is superior to any other cult, religion or social organization [Sura 9-102:6, you keep your 'religion' and don't taint Islam with your dogma].

These themes are that of a cult, not a religion. Perhaps Moslems might first want to read the Koran to associate themselves with the pagan-fascist [communalism which eradicates the individual, rationality and free-will], cult of a man who was most likely quite insane. 

Sura 109 and Moslem supremacism. It is not a verse about peace and tolerance.

The one-world Cultural Marxist wonders need to learn how to read.

Monday, April 3, 2017 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

Sura 109 is held up in awe by the one-world wonders as an example of Islam's endless love and tolerance. It ranks up there with 2:256 in the pantheon of cultural Marxist worship, in which the reader is informed that Infidels will be fought, overcome and dominated by those who follow Allah [read the entire passage from 2:256 to 2:275]. Sura 109 is a short Sura, orally transcribed by Muhammad when his cult was weak, with few followers and harassed by Meccan authorities, who were tired of listening to Muhammad's gibberish that the Arab pagan pantheon was 'evil', and that the Hub'Allah demanded a stricter, totalitarian, and more ritualistic method of worship – with himself as the prime actor in the cult.

Here is Sura 109 translated by Hilali-Khan:

“Al-Kafirun In the Name of Allah, the Most Beneficent, the Most Merciful.
Say (O Muhammad (Peace be upon him)to these Mushrikun and Kafirun): "O Al-Kafirun (disbelievers in Allah, in His Oneness, in His Angels, in His Books, in His Messengers, in the Day of Resurrection, and in Al-Qadar, etc.)!

 

"I worship not that which you worship,

"Nor will you worship that which I worship. "And I shall not worship that which you are worshipping.

"Nor will you worship that which I worship.

“To you be your religion, and to me my religion (Islamic Monotheism)."

 

Cultural Marxists and self-loathing Western idiots can't get enough of this Sura. You worship your Gods, I will worship mine. Oh wow, that is so tolerant. It proves Islam's superiority! But not really. There are three aspects to this verse that the one-world wonders miss.

1 ) Before Muhammad started Jihad, war, extermination, overt racism, and brigandage his small band of family members and cult devotees never numbered more than a handful. So of course someone who is being persecuted by the authorities is going to whine, 'please leave me alone, worship your 'Gods', and I will worship mine.'

2 ) More importantly, and rarely mentioned, is the fact that Muhammad is talking about Allah or Hub'Allah, being the main 'god' amongst many. In other words the import of this Sura is that it references Arab polytheism. What Muhammad is saying is that the Arabs can worship their many Gods, but he will worship only one – Hubal or 'ilah – namely the 'one Lord'.

3 )This Sura references a contract stemming from the above 2 points, forwarded by Muhammad to the Quraish elite.

Now some other translators have a different set of words for the 5^th sentence, and all of them make it clear that Muhammad is denying polytheism and elevating his idea of that Allah is the main 'God' amongst all the Gods:

Nor will ye worship that which I worship. Pickthall and Ali

Nor will you be the worshipper of what I worship. Daryabadi and Dawood

Nor will ye serve what I serve;- Palmer

Nor will you ever worship what I worship. Khalifa

And neither will you [ever] worship that which I worship. Asad etc.

 

Sura 109 is not a celebration of multi-cultural harmony. It is Muhammad stating the obvious. You pagan Arabs will continue to worship your Gods [as long as your state and society are strong]; and our small cult will worship our one 'God'. So let's agree to disagree is what he is asking.

 

But notice the contradiction in this Sura. The Koran demands that you believe that Allah or Hub'Allah is the 'one'. Only he can be worshipped. Yet Sura 109 is clear – other gods were being worshipped including Allah. Allah is not unique, not connected to Judaism, and has no reference in Judeo-Christian theology. Allah was being worshipped by the pagan Arabs [in the form of Hub'Al] along with 359 other deities. Muhammad is thus confirming the paganism of this Allah.

 

Lastly, the Sura is a proposed contract from Muhammad to the Quraish elite. We know this from Moslem sources. Maududi the early twentieth century Moslem fanatic and supporter of unfettered Jihad states that Sura 109 refers to a proposed peace initiative from Muhammad to the Quraish elite. When you take this into account the Sura does not declaim for tolerance, but simply rejects the Meccan belief system. This fact eventually drove Muhammad from Mecca – at the threat of being killed by the Quraish. Tolerance does not exist in Islam, nor in Muhammadan theology. As Maududi confirms:

 

“....[this Sura] was revealed in order to exonerate the Muslims from the disbelievers religion, their rites of worship, and their gods, and to express their total disgust and unconcern with them and to tell them that Islam and kufr (unbelief) had nothing in common and there was no possibility of their being combined and mixed into one entity. Although it was addressed in the beginning to the disbelieving Quraish in response to their proposals of compromise, yet it is not confined to them only, but having made it a part of the Quran, Allah gave the Muslims the eternal teaching that they should exonerate themselves by word and deed from the creed of kufr wherever and in whatever form it be, and should declare without any reservation that they cannot make any compromise with the disbelievers in the matter of Faith.”

 

So much for one-world, inter-faith tolerance. Sura 109 has nothing to do with love and hope. It is a clear statement of supremacism, and the innate Moslem belief of their own superiority.

 

The Arab and Muslim love affair with slavery.

And Blacks too for that matter. Certainly not a white-only issue.

Monday, April 3, 2017 by Ferdinand III
Full Article

Muslim brutality and Islam's primitive nature is represented by its devotion to slavery. From 622 A.D. until now, the Muslims have harvested, shipped, and enslaved somewhere between 11 to 30 million Blacks and Caucasians. Until the 20th century at least 11-15 million Blacks were taken out of Africa and shipped into the Arab heartland. A similar number of Whites and Caucasians from Eastern Europe and the Black Sea regions were likewise transhipped into Muslim empires until the 19th century.

A far greater number of Hindus, Central Asians and Buddhists were similarly enslaved in the Arab empire and its successor states in the Subcontinent and beyond. It is a sordid record never discussed. No one knows for sure, but it is not an exaggeration to suppose that 40 million non-Muslims were directly enslaved by Mohammedans. This is four times greater than the number of Blacks sent across to the Atlantic – 4 million of whom ended up in Brazil, and 2 milion of whom ended up in the United States. 

But don't worry no-one will discuss the history of Arab and Muslim slave trading. This after all is a White-only crime. 

Arab and later Muslim empires were of course built on plunder, squatting and slavery. The Arabs and Muslims did not invent, nor create, anything new. They simply took over the existing and far superior civilisations of the Jews, the Christians, the Persians, the Hindus and the Greeks. Medicine, mathematics, philosophy, writing, literature, plumbing, hospitals, sewers, architecture, cement, agricultural techniques, irrigation – any and all sundry accroutements of civilisation were built by the Greeks, the Romans, the Jews, the Persians, the Mesopotamians, or the Hindus. The Arabs contributed nothing. 

Except the slave trade that is. 

The Arabs were superb at trading human flesh. Better even than Blacks who had enslaved each other for millenia, long before the White man arrived on the African scene. The Arab's empire depended on slavery – for profit, for building, for tending to mines and industry, and even for military drafts. Without the trade in Black and White slaves, the Arab and Muslim empires would have collapsed. 

According to Bernard Lewis, author of 'Race and Slavery in the Middle East': "Black slaves were brought into the Islamic world by a number of routes - from West Africa across the Sahara to Morocco and Tunisia, from Chad across the desert to Libya, from East Africa down the Nile to Egypt, and across the Red Sea and Indian Ocean to Arabia and the Persian Gulf. Turkish slaves from the steppe-lands were marketed in Samarkand and other Muslim Central Asian cities and from there exported to Iran, the Fertile Crescent, and beyond. Caucasians, of increasing importance in the later centuries, were brought from the land bridge between the Black Sea and the Caspian and were marketed mainly in Aleppo and Mosul." The trade was vital for the Arab economy. 

One can make a very good argument that Islam and the Koran are inherently racist and anti-Black, if not anti-White. Kaffir is a derogatory Arab word first used to denote Blacks as inferior sub-humans, which was later expanded to include all non-Muslims. Slavery of Blacks and other non-Muslims is expressly accepted and encouraged in the Koran. Though the mad fascist Muslim founder Mohammed, states that freeing slaves gains merit, he certainly never made any prohibitions against acquiring slaves. In fact Mohammed encouraged by his own actions and various 'revelations' extensive slave-owning. Sura 33, verse 50 states for example: "Prophet, we have made lawful for you.... the slave-girls whom God has given you as booty." 

Mohammed not only owned and traded slaves himself – he also quite enjoyed female slaves as sex toys. Women captured in war or bought as slaves on the market could be raped at will by Muslims. The Koran encouraged this. Suras 23:1 and 70:22 state that it is lawful to have sex with slave girls. The Hadiths are filled with references to slaves owned by Mohammed and his associates. In one Hadith Mohammed intervened to reverse one man's emancipation of six slaves. By casting lots, Mohammed denied freedom to four of them. Charitable he was not. 

One does not recall the figure of Christ using women as sex chattel. 

With such a poor example set by the founder of Islam, it is no wonder that Muslim countries were slow to forbid slavery. Britain abolished the slave trade in 1807 and the institution in 1837. Over 500.000 White males died eradicating in part if not instantly in whole, the insidious and barbaric Southern US slave society. Yet no such corollary exists in the non-Western world. 

The Ottoman Empire abolished slavery in stages, beginning in 1847, when trading in slaves was banned in the Persian Gulf – under threat of British military action. Women slaves were still sold in the Ottoman Empire as late as 1908. Slavery continued after the Ottoman Empire was crushed in 1924. Qatar did not abolish slavery until 1952. Yemen and Saudi Arabia abolished slavery in 1962, and Mauritania did not officially abolish slavery until 1980. And of course slavery still exists in parts of Africa, Brazil, Pakistan, the Sudan and other parts of the Islamic world including the forced marriages of young Muslim girls, usually premised on sex, to older men in exchange for money. Compassionate this trade is not. 

Muslims appear to be obsessed with slavery. This would make sense. Slavery has often been declared by Muslim clerics and 'thinkers' as a fundamental part of Islamic culture and doctrine. Many Muslim leaders refuse to countenance the destruction of the slave institution. It is not hard to see why. Muslim slavery of others simply highlights their superiority and Allah's admonition via Mohammed, that Islam must conquer the globe. If male Muslims rule, than de facto the rest are slaves or at best, second-class dhimmi citizens, prey to whatever rules Muslims devise. 

Sharia law, Muslim demands in the West to reorder social and cultural life, and radical extremist arrogance in viewing the world as a pre-determined domain of Allah or the moon cult, all stem from the Muslim obsession with domination. Dominating others through jihad, terror, and slavery is a fundamental aspect of Islamic intolerance. 

This is not to say that all Muslims are voracious slave traders and sex chattel operators. But there is something remarkably pagan and primitive, if not outlandishly savage, about an ideology in the 21rst century which still protects and participates in the most de-humanizing of activities. The natural law rights of men, such an important part of Western civilisational development, is completely alien to Islam. 

It is no wonder that the history of Islam is in some sense, a history of the slave trade. From West Africa to the islands of Indonesia, the Arabs and Muslims have been history's most ruthless slavers and flesh traders. This ties in nicely with Islamic ideology and its commands. 

But don't worry – no one will discuss it. After all according to the multi-cult piety, Islam is holy and good, even one supposes, its extensive history of slavery.