Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was superior to anything Islam had developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions. Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'. Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.
The cultural differences between the systems of thought, induced by the ideologies of Islam and those which comprise Western society are worlds apart. Islam has little if anything in
common with Christian ideals, Western culture, or modern, Christian and even
secular rationalism – irrational and obtuse as much secular ‘logic’ is today
(cosmology, globaloneywarming, tulips to teachers etc, which are philosophies
not science). Contrary to revisionist literature and pathetic Muslim apologia
Western scientific, artistic, religious, societal and historically development
has little connection with and imported scant material from Islam. Islam is a
complete system of 'being' and this cultural fact – mass communalism and
subservience to an abstract and never explained moon deity from Mecca called
'Allah' or ‘The Lord’ (Baal of course); makes conflict at every level
domestically, and internationally, inevitable.
When
cultures collide, conflict erupts. When modernity runs into pagan pre-modern
cultures, modernity will triumph provided that it does not compromise its own
culture. Our current post modern Marxist obsession with relativity and the
dismantling of Western ideals is an obvious display of suicide premised on
ignorance. Once you destroy what you are and who you are, there is little left
to defend, and little energy remaining to improve. Islam does not suffer from
post-modern communal loathing.
Islam is
not a religion in the Christian sense. The book of Matthew which houses the
sermon on the mount; the golden rule; and the basic ethos of Jewish-Christian
and indeed near eastern ideals on life, family, society, responsibility and
spiritual health; has no equal or counterpart in the Koran. Christian thought
is not replicated in Muslim-Quranic thought.
Christianity
is concerned with seeking truth, the obvious existence of the immaterial, mental
and spiritual health; the consequences of actions; the need to reflect,
tolerate, learn, embrace and be hospitable to strangers; as well as aid the
poor and sick and build a better world for all. Islamic doctrine supplied by
the Koran, the Hadiths and Sharia Law do not share these concerns. The Koran splits the world into two, Moslems
against the Rest; with lurid, violent calls to dominate, convert, war, commit jihad,
and to rule. Islam is a cult in which the few – male Muslims – dominate the
rest.
Islam has
never been based on reason, the interstation of faith and logic or universal
morality. Christianity is suffused with all of these. By its very nature, the faith of Christ is
open to inquiry, socio-economic and technological change, invention, and
fluidity. It is malleable yet concrete,
and this is the reason it was able to dominate the world. Even the poorly named Christian reformation did
in some sense aid in a liberation of spirit, economy and self-confidence which
inspired European world domination. This ‘reformation’ was in many ways a deformation,
calling for sola scriptura, the putting aside of good works with salvation through
faith alone; and of course the violent destruction of hundreds of thousands of
lives; art, treasure, irreplaceable artefacts and architecture. The ‘reformation’ of the 16th
century in Europe was more about power and absolutism than anything else. Having said the obvious, it is also clear
that the egregious conduct at times of the Church, had necessitated a
response. There are no corollaries
within the Arab cult named Submission.
Christian
spiritual reformation has always been on-going.
Bishop and ascetic Chrysostom in the 4th century ridiculed
the hypocrisy of contemporary Christians and especially the plutocratic elite;
a series of charges which would be quite appropriate today. Every era saw reformers of various bents and
hues advocating change and usually a return to the simplicity of Christ’s
doctrine. In many areas of Christendom
by the 15th century, taken over by secular and monied interests, the
Christian church had grown rotted and fat, greased with money, wealth,
corruption and venality. It was as far removed from the book of Matthew as Islamic
doctrine is removed from reason. The Christian church by the 16th century was
no longer a spiritual force, but just another kingdom on earth with popes
playing the role of emperor, the church elders engaged in legal issues and
lawsuits, to expand their money, power and make states subservient to Rome, and
tax money often flowing to a centralised and unaccountable church bureaucracy
and city. Yet, despite this,
science, medicine, art, trade and capitalism, funded, supported and developed
by the Church flourished.
Contrary
to modern propaganda, the medieval Christian church had many positives. The
monkish orders were the main providers of capital, agricultural technology and
farming improvements. The church housed the most literate and learned of men.
Roger Bacon one of the earliest exponents of the scientific method and other
rationalists were monks and supported by church money to improve technology and
daily life. Hundreds of inventions
including optics, eye glasses, modern math and astronomy, issued from the Church
and its endeavours. The Church was the
only stable benefactor in a world of shifting kingdoms, neglect of the poor,
denigration of women, and the persecution of the weak.
It was the
Church which saved civilization both from Rome, and post-Rome. The Christian message of true spirituality
released society from the burdens and regulations of dogma, superstition and
irrational rule making. These were all prevalent in the violent Roman-pagan
era, in which 90% of the population was poor, enslaved, illiterate and without
hope. Christianity refocused society on
the true meanings of liberation, namely equality, faith and hope. It generated
energy, dynamism and ideas. The Church made the call to individual freedom and
the striking down of an unaccountable cultish mentality which had rotted pagan
society into obsolescence.
By
contrast Islam has never a comparable base for its development, nor alignment
with reason and faith. It is
totalitarian. Islam though riven by
sects and different interpretations is monolithic in the sense that the Koran
rules and that subservience to the Koranic-Mohammed ideal the most important
element in a Muslim's life. It is thus the communal over the individual. This
ethos of communal universalism negates what the Christian Church has always
taught. Invention, progress, self-reliance, democratic governance, rational
scientism, these and other derivatives of Western greatness have no corollary
in Islamic history.
Islam was
a squatter's empire. It has self-generated very little to aid human kind. Its
purpose is communal domination. Its expansion was propelled by war, lust, gold,
women and slaves. This is not to say that Western expansionism was benign or
morally correct. But it is obvious that Western settled and developed areas are
far better off than those which are not.
The West
is not some utopia of moral perfection but its original culture of
individuality and Christian ethos regardless of what the chattering Marxists or
Muslims say today, was and is far superior to anything that Islam has or can
offer. Without a Muslim reinvention, a conflict at all levels between the pagan
cult of Islam and the modern world is inevitable. It is a conflict that Islam
will of course lose – as long as the West decides that it should win.
There are only a handful of
exceptions and exemptions from the rising tide of Moslem dominance within ‘White’
states. Ironically these are former USSR
nations including Poland, Hungary, Ukraine, Romania, Bulgaria and Russia,
perhaps Austria. Everywhere else there
is a rising tide, really a flood, of Moslem minority imposition and through PC
fascism and political cowardice – domination.
The ignorance around the Meccan
Muhammadan cult in an age of supposed information plenty is astounding. All major news media are really ‘Fake News’. An example is the Australian
Eco-Fascist Taggart who killed 40 Moslems in New Zealand. He was an eco-zealot, worried about the Earth
mommy, over-population and Globaloney-warming.
He venerated Atheist-Communist China and he wanted a population
reduction and bizarrely an end to guns. According
to Fake News he was a Trump supporter (he was Australian not American), and ‘far
right’.
Taggard murdered 40 Moslems
knowing that the low-IQ secular religion and Fake-News would have their
collective panties in a knot and be doing 5-minute hate screams against the ‘alt-right’
for weeks on end. If he murdered 40
Christians no one would have noticed. Ergo
he chose the favourite pets of the Globalist-Fake news elite. On exactly the same day, Moslems
murdered 120 Christians in Nigeria in an on-going 200-year Christophobia genocide. There was not a single Fake News media report
and not even a condemnation by the usual witless wonders at the Vatican and Catholic
Church.
The above simply highlights the
poverty of the modern secular religion(s) and is punctuated by low intelligence
including Scientism (Stuff happens, miracles, wolf-became-a-whale); Gaia worship
(Co2 and Humans as Satan); multi-culturalism (uni-directional dedicated to destroying
only White-Euro societies); and Sexual Confusion (Queer fascism, LGBT, Polygenders).
It needs to be noticed that only ‘White’
countries must be multi-cultural, sexually-confused half-wits, and Moslemified;
not China, Japan, Africa, Latin America or other non-White states; and that
only ‘White’ countries have a ‘duty’ to import millions of Moslems or Africans
and transform their states into purportedly multi-cultural nirvanas. Saying this obvious fact makes one of course,
a White-nationalist-fascist-phobic.
The new definition of White-‘extremist
right’ is a White male who takes a shower and combs his hair.
In London, with its Moslem mayor
whose only purported job was as a Jihadist lawyer, this policy of
self-immolation and self-hatred has reached new levels of insanity, and given
rise to most of East London becoming Black-Moslem; historically high levels of
crime;
50-70% of Moslems on Welfare; and by 2050 Moslems being the majority
population. The invasion is graphic.
From 35.000 or so Moslems in 1970, London is now suffused with 2.5
million. If this is not a colonialist-flood
than what is?
The table below summarises the
absolute invasion of London, which is not a unique situation in the West, but has
been replicated in almost every major urban area in Western Europe and North America.
|
London 1970 |
London 2019 |
No of Mosques |
<10 |
>600 |
No of Moslems |
35.000 |
1.1 million (2011 data) Based on Mosques (2019) more likely
2.500.000 |
No of Moslems on Welfare |
5-10%, minimal |
Over 1 million |
No of Moslems in jail, prison |
<1000 |
|
No of FGM cases |
Not known |
If you consider
just the UK welfare state – there is no way that the UK can financially survive
the Moslem invasion.
Currently the
government tells the peasants that ‘only’ 1.1 million Moslems live in the Greater
London area based on 2011 data. This is now
a lie, which will be demolished in the 2021 census. There are 600 Mosques just in London
alone. Some are ‘super-size’. The sheer quantity of these Moslem base camps
supports a Moslem population of 2-3 million in a city of 10 million. Given demography and ‘family reunification’
the Moslem pop of London will double within 10 years and will be 40% of London’s
population. By 2040 London will be
majority Moslem. Kumbaya?
Why would any intelligent person support the importation of 200.000 to 300.000 Moslems per year into one large city in a formerly White-Christian country? Is this not Moslem imperialism and colonialism? Are not the usual ‘big brains’ against any form of colonialism, imperialism or population destruction? Or, is their angst only reserved for non-Whites? Isn’t this racism -an ‘ism’ which horrifies the self-proclaimed clever people? So, hating and replacing Whites is not racist, but ‘enlightened’?
One of the main reasons for Brexit winning and still 3 years
later, though not implemented, having the support of 60% of the population, is
the Moslem invasion (the UK has no control over its borders as a vassal state
of the EU-German empire). Of course, expressing that fact publicly will likely land you in a UK
jail. For some reason most Western
governments slavishly protect Moslems from any criticism, but could care less
about Moslems slaughtering on average 40 Christians a day, or engaging
domestically in a range of crimes from FGM, to child-bride marriages, polygamy,
hate-speech (every mosque quoting from Recital), to drugs, knife and gun
attacks. When 70% of Moslems are unemployed
it is unlikely to add ‘value’ or ‘enrich’ anyone.