French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  

Back     Printer Friendly Version  

Saturday, July 03, 2010

Bookmark and Share

Thomas Asbridge: 'The First Crusade'. Simply bloody awful.

English rationality is long dead. RIP Roger Bacon.

by Ferdinand III




The academic and media animus against the Crusades is largely unfounded. Reality, facts, archeology, and the pernicious effects of 400 years of ceaseless Jihad by Muslims against Christian Europe, would affirm to an objective observer that the Crusades were a laggardly reply to what was then, the fight for the survival of Western Civilisation. When Pope Urban II's call went out to recapture lost Christian lands, aid Byzantium, and protect pilgrims being slaughtered in their thousands from the Turks; the year was 1095 – 462 years after Islamic Arabs had raped, and plundered Jerusalem. This was 375 years after Spain was conquered by Islam, a Jihad which destroyed a rich Visigothic Kingdom [albeit a corrupt and rather unpopular one], and enslaved millions of Christians and destroyed the lives of millions more.


But enter the academics. Along with the lower educational systems and Hollyweird, academia has a mendaciously perverse and narrow-minded, view of the Crusades. Asbridge is emblematic of this mental disease. A tax-paid lecturer at the University of London, Asbridge's work on the Crusades tells us nothing worthwhile. It is simply the usual tired, profane and incorrect litany of what the popular culture has already told us; the Crusaders were barbarians; they were dumb brutes; the Muslims were wonderful sophisticates, there was no reason for this unprovoked war; and atrocities were unevenly distributed with the Latin 'Frank's committing most of the sins against God and morality. Today's Islamic Fascism was given birth directly the by the toothless mid-wife named the Holy Crusade:


“The First Crusade's impact upon the relationship between western Christendom and Islam proved the most insidious and destructive.”


This ignorance permeates the entire book. In fact the ignominious illiteracy is so widespread that no one who has even a passing fancy with facts can read this book in its entirety. It is well documented by Arab and Muslim sources that Europe was to be conquered. First Constantinople which did fall in 1453, and then Rome itself. Rome was attacked and pillaged in 846. The Arabs were 120 miles south of Paris when they were defeated in 732 AD by Charles the Hammer. Large tracts of Italy, southern France and even Switzerland were under the control of the Muslims for some 100 years. Slavery, slave-trading, taxation, trade disruption, the initiation of a dark period of economic and social turmoil, not to mention hundreds of thousands dead; followed.


Asbridge covers up his obvious hatred of Western civilization and of the Crusades by a long list of primary and secondary sources. But they are very selective. Almost all of the works are by those authors – all of them refuted by facts and archeology – who are themselves hostile to the West. In this sense Asbridge's book is little more than just a polishing and refurbishing of tired all gibberish already purveyed and discounted by real research. I would expect even an English academic, steeped in cultural Marxism and theoretical bafflegab to be somewhat more even-handed and perspicacious in the handling of such an important topic. Asbridge is simply a tax-payer paid hack, playing to the choir of neo-Marxists who love Islam, hate the West and view any and all matters of Western civilization through an oriental lens of victim hood and pagan purity. Without the Crusades it is clear that Europe might well have fallen to the Muslim – and hacks like Asbridge would be writing in Arabic not English. A far more important book to read is that by Rodney Stark – 'God's Battalions'. Stark is a brilliant writer and researcher at Baylor University and in reviewing his work I wrote:


As Stark relates the Crusades were a success. They nullified the Muslim jihad against Europe. They proved the superiority of European culture. They ensured European salvation and progress by opening up trade, the flow of ideas from East to West and by exposing the various weaknesses of Islam and Muslim states. They were not permanent for two simple reasons. First, there never was enough of the Crusaders to resettle and exhaustively protect their Levantine holdings. Second, the European population tired of the enterprise, unable and unwilling to sustain the high taxes and the loss of young leaders that the Crusades demanded. They became war-weary.
The value of this book is that it destroys the lies, the myths, and the Marxist inspired innuendo so prevalent in the current culture about one of Europe's most vital responses to Muslim jihad. The 'medieval' European was advanced, superior and more certain of himself, than anything that Europe can produce today. That is also an important lesson from Stark's research and from the profound cultural efflorescence which can send men 2500 miles away to fight in impossible conditions to defend right, morality and civilization.


All of this is true. The difference between Stark and Asbridge is this; Stark let's his views be informed by facts, Asbridge by cultural Marxist theory. The modern world was created by Christian Europe – a fact which is the most important and obvious observation possible. From that fact must flow both the antecedents and the sources of European superiority.


As Rodney Stark relates, the Crusades were an expression of superiority not of inferiority. The entire civilization of Europe was richer, better educated, and far more advanced in industry and agriculture than the Islamic. It had to be. Europeans cleared forests, marshes, bogs and even reclaimed land from the sea. They built the largest colossi on the planet. Roads, canals, and bridges in quantity and quality were created which far exceeded in both number and usefulness anything found within the Islamic world. From axles, to the deep iron plough, to the clock and glass lens, European invention abounded. Nothing of note, nor even of comparable genius can be found anywhere in the Islamic world. Asbridge and academics just assume that a barbarous, pagan moon cult, produces civilization.


The real world tells us otherwise. Christian Europe created the foundations of the modern world from 500 to 1500 AD. Every single invention during the rather poorly named 'Enlightenment' was already formed or in use before 1500 AD. Islam invented and created nothing. Yet academics and others like Asbridge still persist in using propaganda to tell us the opposite. It is revolting.


When you read this book, or I should say, when you try to read this rather importunate and illiterate tome of Arab propaganda, some other salient points come to mind. Tax payers in England have funded the CRU-Hadley Globlaoney Warming scam based on criminally fraudulent data. Globaloney Warming is of course a criminal enterprise. Prince Charles is an open advocate of Islam and believes that Islam can save the environment. The English state funds mosques, Islamic centers and radical Imams some 40% of whom are on welfare. So perhaps a work by an English academic like Asbridge extoling Islam and denigrating Christian Europe and the Crusades is no surprise. English culture no longer exists. Neither does rationality. The legacy of Roger Bacon is long dead in England.

 


Article Comments:

Related Articles:

Crusades


11/20/2016:  The Crusades in Christian perspective

6/28/2016:  Atheist-Protestant lies about the Crusades - all to further the victimhood status of the Moon cult

5/1/2015:  Belloc and the glory of the Crusades and the liberation of Christians.

4/23/2015:  The Legend of Don Pelayo, by Marian Horvat, Phd.

4/13/2015:  Why the Crusades were necessary. No Islam, no Jihad, no necessity for the Crusades.

3/6/2015:  Witless Westerners, the 'sack of Jerusalem', and Moslem propaganda.

3/4/2015:  The Crusades, Jerusalem and the myth of 'rivers of blood'

2/27/2015:  'Glory of the Crusades', Steve Weidenkopf. Why did they go?

2/25/2015:  'Glory of the Crusades', Steve Weidenkopf Phd [appeal to authority!]

7/17/2014:  The real cause of the Crusades was Islam of course. The moon cult's Jihad.

6/9/2014:  Tyerman and Crusading, in 'The Medieval World' edited by Peter Linehan, Janet L. Nelson, 2013

7/1/2013:  Ernle Bradford: 'The Great Siege of Malta'.

6/5/2011:  The Monks of War, by Desmond Seward

5/6/2011:  Teutonic Knights: Desmond Seward's 'The Monks of War', 1972, Penguin books.

4/25/2011:  The Albigensian Crusade and Cultural Marxism

4/20/2011:  Thomas Madden, 'The New Concise History of the Crusades', and Sultan Baibars.

4/15/2011:  Thomas J. Madden's, The Concise History of the Crusades, 2005. Part One.

3/17/2011:  Book Review: 'The Crusades', by Michael Paine, Chartwell Books 2006, 137 pages.

1/13/2011:  January 13th 1128, the Pope recognizes the Knights Templar.

1/9/2011:  The Crusades - the necessity of fighting back.

1/8/2011:  Review: 'The Crusades' by Johnathan Riley-Smith 2nd edition.

1/2/2011:  Michael Haag: 'The Templars' - part 2.

12/29/2010:  'The Templars', by Michael Haag

12/4/2010:  Joseph Attard, 'The Knights of Malta'

11/24/2010:  Cavaliero's, the Knights of Malta or 'The Last of the Crusaders' – prosperity and benign governance.

11/23/2010:  Review: Roderick Cavaliero's 'The Last of the Crusaders and the Knights of St. John'

10/27/2010:  A first-hand account: “The [Great] Siege of Malta 1565”, by Francisco Balbi di Correggio

10/13/2010:  The Knights of Malta (1530-1798). Integral to Western development.

10/12/2010:  Hospitallers part 2: The Knights of Cyprus and Rhodes (1309-1522)

10/11/2010:  A brief history of the Hospitallers and the Knights of St. John.

10/10/2010:  David Nicolle, 'Knights of Jerusalem, the Crusading Order of Hospitallers 1100-1565.'

9/17/2010:  Nicholas Kristof and the Lame-Stream media hatred of the Crusades.

9/14/2010:  Review: 'Byzantium and the Crusades', by Johnathan Harris.

9/9/2010:  'Holy Warriors: A Modern History of The Crusades', by Johnathan Phillips

8/3/2010:  Review: 'Making War in the Name of God', Christopher Catherwood

7/29/2010:  1204 and the Crusader 'sack' of Constantinople. A necessity.

7/12/2010:  Roger Crowley: 'Constantinople, The Last Great Siege 1453'

7/3/2010:  Thomas Asbridge: 'The First Crusade'. Simply bloody awful.

6/19/2010:  The beautiful Crusades and saving civilization.

6/18/2010:  Christopher Tyerman, "God's War: A New History of the Crusades" - Read it.

6/17/2010:  Piers Paul Read: 'The Templars'. A great 'Read'.

6/16/2010:  Book Review: 'The Crusades', by Michael Paine, Chartwell Books 2006, 137 pages.

6/3/2010:  Medieval Italy; why did the Christian north succeed where the Orientalized south failed ?

5/11/2010:  Book Review: 'The Crusaders' by Regine Pernoud.

4/19/2010:  Book Review; Regine Pernoud, 'Those terrible Middle Ages'

4/11/2010:  Book Review: “The Templars” by Regine Pernoud, English edition 2009.

4/4/2010:  July 15 1099 – one of the great days in history. Jerusalem retaken.

4/3/2010:  Book Review: Empires of the Sea, by Roger Crowley. [The Final Battle for the Mediterranean]

3/20/2010:  Review: Rodney Stark's 'God's Battalions – The Case for the Crusades'

3/16/2010:  Why the Crusades were a success.

4/24/2009:  Byzantium: The Decline and Fall by John Julius Norwich, 450 pgs, 1996.

3/17/2009:  Common myths about the Seven Crusades which occurred 1095 to 1299