Wiker is his book on Science and the Church [The Catholic Church and Science], makes the important point that Aristotle's observations were in the main defended by the Church, because they were opposed to the atomism and materialism of the Greek secularists, those who saw in nature, and 'reason' [whatever reason may mean, there are many variations of 'reason']; all the answers to existence.
“...Epicurus [4th century BC].....materialism eliminated both religion and fear of the god's punishment, for at death...our atoms disassociate and we exist no longer...Epicurus identified the good with the physically pleasurable...and evil with what is physically painful...”
Epicurus was a formative influence in the poorly named 'Enlightenment'.
Lucretius his intellectual slave was little better. Wiker:
“Lucretius furthered the development of Epicurean materialism.....and adds a theory of generation of all living things by the random association of material atomic particles – a Darwinian-type evolutionary theory about 2000 years before Darwin. As with Epicurus, the goal was to remove the need for God the creator.”
Wiker makes the important point that Galileo who ran afoul of the Church supposedly for teaching helio-centricity [a myth] was an atomist-materialist, in direct contradiction to Church belief. If Galileo had only proposed Copernican ideas as worthy of study, he would have had no trouble. Copernicus' system was of course as cumbersome as that of the Ptolemaic. It was Kepler, not Copernicus who discovered the mathematics to the support elliptical orbits of the planets. Until Kepler it was an open debate which system made more sense – the Ptolemaic embedded in the University and academic system – or the newer proposition by Copernicus which still did not account for the actual movements of the planets.
One of the reasons that the Enlightenment was so hostile to a lot of Aristotelian theory, was that Aristotle opposed atomism and materialism. This offended the secular-'humanists' [Atheists], who demanded in various theorems that the material world, as identified by rationalist [positivism, where the mind is the only reality]; could explain everything. There was no need for many of these 'Enlightened' thinkers for a God, supernaturality, miracles or 'complexity'. Nature or its material dialecticism could explain everything.
There is of course plenty wrong about much of what Aristotle said. However, he was strongly and correctly in my view, of the opinion that reason itself had many issues and a definable limit. For example is the 'rationalism' of Epicurus [materialism] from the 4th century BC, reconcilable with the 'rationalism' of say Pythagoras [everything is mathematical], Democritus [everything is chaotic atomism]; Marxism [history is great sweeping materialistic phases]; or Atheism [reason is a by product of chance and chaos] ? Aristotle knew that rational theologies were not only corrupt, often-times weak in their logic, but open to divisive debate and censure.
As Wiker states, 'Nominalism' [from the Latin word to name] is a rationalist theology which believes that nothing is real. Nominalists conclude that the name cat is artificially affixed to a creature with a cell agglomeration which is in the shape of what our mind calls a cat. But that name is not real, neither really is the cat. It is just a lump of atoms. This 'relativity' is often embraced by the great and good as the highest form of 'rationalism'. It is nothing new. Nominalism was around in 300 BC and rejected by Aristotle. Cats are distinct creatures, and are not dogs. If you can't make that distinction you are simply a lunatic.
The Church therefore sided with Aristotle during the Middle Ages starting in the 4th century to stand against atomism, materialism which by their own logic, preclude the spiritual, a soul, the Eucharist and the entire canon of Church belief. Wiker makes this important point and this is the key reason why 'Enlightenment' 'thinkers', are so hostile to Aristotle and so contemptuous of Medieval Church Scholasticism. They desire to eradicate Church canonical liturgy and replace it with atomistic materialism as espoused by Epicurus who was in vogue in the 17th and 18th centuries and Atheist-Darwinism which builds on Epicurus' ideas and demands that you believe nothing created everything by magical processes of naturalism.
Islam was spread by conquest and in particular, by the lure of the spoils of war. The cult around Muhammad was only affirmed and deepened when he started handing out war booty. Thus was Jihad the central pillar of Islam. Without war and the distribution of plunder, no one would have joined Muhammad's cult.
The Jizya tax on Infidels is of course a tribute payment, or plunder to be taken from non-Moslems. This tribute payment is a ransom which protects the non-Moslems conquered by Muhammad's cult, from further Jihad predations. If the non-Moslems join the cult, they don't have to pay this head-tax. Historically this was one important reason why non-Moslems 'converted' to the Meccan moon cult.
Narrated 'Amr bin 'Auf Al-Ansari:
(who was an ally of Bam 'Amr bin Lu'ai and one of those who had taken part in (the Ghazwa of) Badr): Allah's Apostle sent Abu 'Ubaida bin Al-Jarreh to Bahrain to collect the Jizya. Allah's Apostle had established peace with the people of Bahrain and appointed Al-'Ala' bin Al-Hadrami as their governor. When Abu 'Ubaida came from Bahrain with the money, the Ansar heard of Abu 'Ubaida's arrival which coincided with the time of the morning prayer with the Prophet.
Jews and Christians can live under Moslem rule if they pay the Jizya poll tax and resign themselves to be second-class knaves under Moslem oppression, existing at the pleasure of Moslems.
Narrated Ibn 'Umar:
Umar bin Al-Khattab expelled all the Jews and Christians from the land of Hijaz. Allah's Apostle after conquering Khaibar, thought of expelling the Jews from the land which, after he conquered it belonged to Allah, Allah's Apostle and the Muslims. But the Jews requested Allah's Apostle to leave them there on the condition that they would do the labor and get half of the fruits (the land would yield). Allah's Apostle said, "We shall keep you on these terms as long as we wish." Thus they stayed till the time of 'Umar's Caliphate when he expelled them to Taima and Ariha.
Muhammad distributed booty to attract followers to his cult. Obviously to obtain booty, war and brigandage were and are necessary. No war, no booty, no cult members.
Narrated Anas bin Malik:
When Allah favored His Apostle with the properties of Hawazin tribe as Fai (booty), he started giving to some Quarries men even up to one-hundred camels each, whereupon some Ansari men said about Allah's Apostle, "May Allah forgive His Apostle! He is giving to (men of) Quraish and leaves us, in spite of the fact that our swords are still dropping blood (of the infidels)" When Allah's Apostle was informed of what they had said, he called the Ansar and gathered them...Allah's Apostle replied, I give to such people as are still close to the period of Infidelity (i.e. they have recently embraced Islam and Faith is still weak in their hearts).
Islam was formed in the immorality of war, Jihad, plunder, rape and supremacist annihilation of the Pagans, Jews and Christians. For a Westerner with an advanced Liberal arts degrees, this proves that Islam is peace.
Most Western quackademics and cultural Marxist media personalities, know nothing about Islam. One of the main reasons the Moslem cult spread out of Medina and conquered Arabia and beyond was the attraction of pillage and sex-slavery. Mein Hadith are full of accounts of 'booty', 'spoils', 'armour' [another word for spoil in Arabic]; women, slaves and money taken from those conquered. I don't remember Christ leading Jihad expeditions of plundering brigands and sex-addled misogynists, though surely Phd's exist which prove just that [complete with computer code and 'models'].
Muhammad takes camels [a valuable asset] as war – booty:
Narrated Nafi from Ibn Umar:
Allah's Apostle sent a Sariya [armed force] towards Najd, and Abdullah bin 'Umar was in the Sariya. They gained a great number of camels as war booty. The share of each one of them was twelve or eleven camels, and they were given an extra camel each.
Keep the key warriors happy with their 'fair share' of the booty:
Narrated Ibn 'Umar:
Allah's Apostle used to give extra share to some of the members of the Sariya he used to send, in addition to the shares they shared with the army in general.
Only the Ghazi or warriors of Jihad share in the plunder:
Narrated Abu Musa:
.."Allah's Apostle has sent us here and ordered us to stay here, so you too, stay with us." We stayed with him till we all left (Ethiopia) and met the Prophet at the time when he had conquered Khaibar. He gave us a share from its booty (or gave us from its booty). He gave only to those who had taken part in the Ghazwa with him. but he did not give any share to any person who had not participated in Khaibar's conquest except the people of our ship, besides Ja'far and his companions, whom he gave a share as he did them (i.e. the people of the ship).
Muhammad is warned to make sure the men are happy with their share of the plunder.....
Narrated Jabir bin Abdullah:
While Allah's Apostle was distributing the booty at Al-Ja'rana, somebody said to him "Be just (in your distribution)." The Prophet replied, "Verily I would be miserable if I did not act justly."
Join Muhammad's cult, kill an Unbeliever ape and pig; obtain some spoils, buy property, join the wealthy.......
Narrated Abu Qatada:
We set out in the company of Allah's Apostle on the day (of the battle) of Hunain. ....After the people returned, the Prophet sat and said, "Anyone who has killed an enemy and has a proof of that, will posses his spoils.....So, Allah's Apostle gave the spoils to me. I sold that armor (i.e. the spoils) and with its price I bought a garden at Bani Salima, and this was my first property which I gained after my conversion to Islam.
Ah the benefits of Muhammadan cult membership. Divine sanction to kill pagans, Jews, and Christians; 4 wives, unlimited Infidel sex-slaves; booty, pillage and property. Not to mention 72 virgins in the Moslem heaven in an afterlife flowing with wine and water.....No moral theology needed here. Just the attractions of the material and physical.
St. Thomas Aquinas was one of the rarest and most brilliant intellects in history. He was a mental polymath, conversant in theology, philosophy, logic, rhetoric, mathematics, astronomy and pagan knowledge [referred to by the Enlightenment as the 'Classics'.] Aquinas was recognized in the 13th century as a formidable intellect in an age of burgeoning real-science, experimentation, advances in math and astronomy, and a plethora of urban and ecclesiastical building. Trade was both lengthened and deepened; inventions in industry, agriculture, masonry, finance, shipping and military arms, marks out the era as one of rapid progress. Indeed the 4 centuries from roughly 900-1300 manifested the greatest increase in prosperity for the average human in history, until our own modern era.
The Catholic genius and his works are hard to master for the average modern layman. He is not an easy read. In summary we can say that Aquinas basically Christianizes Aristotle. Importantly he provides a concept of natural science, in marrying observation to experimentation and measurement, that is totally absent from Greek-Roman metaphysics. He does so to support his view that reason cannot explain all of life and certainly not the immaterial. Reason supports faith. This is called Thomist or Thomism philosophy.
I would state that Aristotle was of course wrong on many issues [see here for eg]. He was in the main a materialist and naturalist which by itself is neutral. However, unlike the Christian Scholastics of Aquinas' era in the early 13th century, Aristotle did no real scientific work. For example he claimed the earth did not move. Basic astrology/astronomy, buttressed by known mathematics in 330 BC would have allowed him to hypothesize that the earth does indeed move – and quite rapidly. The tools were available to either support or to put into doubt his own hypothesis. Within Aristotelian theory there is no known process of experimentation, testing, hypothesis refutation, observational evidence and conclusions leading to a new or improved hypothesis. Methods of science would not arrive until the age of Aquinas.
Aquinas is usually portrayed as a follower of Aristotle. This is nonsense. He was a Catholic theologian who uses Aristotle’s ideas to further support Christianity and he is especially focused on real science and methods of discovering the laws, secrets, and order of the natural world. This is the only sensible way to look at his work. During the medieval era Greek philosophical ideas in all areas had been known and debated since the time of Boethius in the 5th century. Another lie by the Marxist multiculti cult is that 'Aristotle's naturalism', or his apparent demand that you look into nature for scientific reasons as to why natural phenomena occur [no need for Zeus, Hera etc.]; only seeped into a 'dark' Europe in the 10th century via Islamic Spain, itself a nightmare of oppression, raids, intellectual suppression and Christian-hate. This is utter bunk and a-historical rewriting to support the rather insipid claim that a totalitarian cult from Mecca was somehow 'enlightened', to use the 'secular-humanist's' [Marxist-anti human] favourite term. Aristotle did not practice real science and medieval Europe was well aware of his naturalism as meagre as it truly was long before the arrival of Muhammad's cult.
The power of Thomism is that reason leads to faith; and faith supports this journey of reason to realms beyond the material. In other words, it is a sad, sorry existence if you believe that only matter is real and that all matter is some chance occurrence, randomly producing complexity. [From Étienne Gilson's The Philosophy of St. Thomas Aquinas (pgs. 37-55)]
“This transcendent influence of Faith upon Reason is an essential fact which it is important to understand, if the true features of Thomistic philosophy are to be preserved. ..This enables us to understand the admirable unity of the philosophical and the theological work of St. Thomas. It is impossible to pretend that a mind of this temper is not fully conscious of its aim. Even in the commentaries on Aristotle, his mind always knows where it is going, and there too, it works towards the doctrine of Faith, not as an explanation, but as a completion and counterpoise of mental balance. And yet one may say that St. Thomas works in the full and clear consciousness of never appealing to arguments not strictly rational, for if Faith acts upon Reason, his Reason, supported and fertilised by his Faith, does not, for all that, cease to perform purely rational operations and to assert conclusions, based only on the evidence of first principles common to all human minds.”
Faith is no enemy of reason. Indeed reason and faith are co-joined. This is one reason why the greatest scientists in history, have been deists. There is no conflict between believing in the immaterial as well as the material.
“At this point we find the reconciliation of the extreme distrust of human Reason the contempt even which St. Thomas sometimes displays towards it, with the keen taste he always retained for dialectical discussions and arguments. For when it is a question of attaining to an object which its very essence renders inaccessible to us, our Reason shows itself powerless and defective in all respects. No one was ever more convinced of this insufficiency than St. Thomas.”
Naturalism by itself, as a science, has many limitations. It cannot for example explain 'why'. Why is a single cell so complex? Yes certainly I can discover its complexity using science. But now I ask myself why do 100 Trillion of these cells co-joined in marvellous complexity, exist at all and how could these many-to-many dependencies and interactions exist by naturalist chance ?
Naturalism has never answered the question Why?. And it never will.
Robert Spencer has a post about a book I just bought but have not yet read, from Canadian-Brit Michael Coren named, 'Hatred; Islam's war on Christianity'. Pithy and appropriate title. As a cult, Islam is in part dedicated to the destruction of Christianity. So too were the Nazi and Communist cults – both of which were premised in large part on Evolution and of course Atheistic 'science'. In both totalitarianisms Christians were killed for opposing the 'science' of the state, namely Darwin's Natural Selection in Germany; and Lysenko's Larmarckian Evolution and state-perfection of man thereby, in Russia. Within Islam 'science' is not used to kill Christians but a supremacist theology certainly is. Christians are derided in Mein Koran as 'People of the Book' [a pejorative term, not one of admiration as propagated by the clueless media]; and in 1600 verses of violence, Moslems are adjured to hate, avoid, attack, dominate, enslave, rape and kill them. The Hadith are no better.
Coren has a well-viewed TV show which dedicates part of its air-time to Moslem attacks on Christians. He is unique in having the courage to do this. Coren was a little late in realizing that Islam was the biggest threat to Christianity, outside of the state and Atheism. I remember discussing with him some years ago the cult of Islam, and he felt that dialogue was indeed possible with Moslems. Now apparently he has seen the light and realizes that the theological texts, the Moslem liturgy, its history of Jihad, the story of its founder; make dialogue not only impossible, but dangerous since it conveys weakness and appeasement.
Spencer on Coren's book:
“The bitter irony is that the chimera of Muslim-Christian dialogue is what has kept all too many Christian leaders in the West from speaking out against the ever-growing horror of Muslim persecution of Christians worldwide. In his brief but thorough new book, Hatred: Islam’s War on Christianity, Michael Coren lays out the whole gruesome and dreadful story: how Islamic law mandates second-class status for Christians and an ongoing, legally sanctioned level of harassment and persecution; how Muslims who persecute Christians today are scrupulously following these directives, which are considered to be the law of Allah himself; and how Christians today are suffering levels of persecution not seen since the days when Christianity was a despised and outlawed sect in the Roman Empire – and in some cases, contemporary Muslims make the ancient Romans look like tolerant multiculturalists.
Syria, Iraq, Egypt, Pakistan, Iran, Indonesia, Africa and elsewhere – virtually everywhere that Christians live among Muslims today, Coren shows in Hatred that Muslims are persecuting their Christian neighbors. In Syria and Iraq, Coren details how this persecution has reached such a level that Christian communities that have lived in those countries since the time of Christ have been completely decimated – killed, forcibly converted, or driven into exile – and are likely never to return.”
Islamic Jihad. 1400 years of Christian-hate and war. Don't expect it to stop because some witless politician or media moron drones on about the 'real Islam'. The 'real Islam' is Mein Koran. Read it. Decide for yourself how tolerant and multi-cultural it is. We need more books like Coren's latest.
Moslem science. There are 4 seasons because the “Hell-fire” agent asked the moon deity for vacation time. This would make Muhammad a climate-change scientist, perhaps the first in history:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "The (Hell) Fire complained to its Lord saying, 'O my Lord! My different parts eat up each other.' So, He allowed it to take two breaths, one in the winter and the other in summer, and this is the reason for the severe heat and the bitter cold you find (in weather)."
Moslem medicine. Your 39.5C temperature arises from the fires of Hell. Cool yourself with some water. That should heel the viruses and bacteria conspiring against your body.
Narrated Rafi bin Khadij:
I heard the Prophet saying, "Fever is from the heat of the (Hell) Fire; so cool it with water."
Moslem natural physics. Fire for cooking or heating, is precisely composed 70% of hell-fire. So spaketh the great man Muhammad, who today would be declared to be not only a prophet, but a 'scientist'. Said fire is better used as a mechanism to kill Unbelievers.
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "Your (ordinary) fire is one of 70 parts of the (Hell) Fire." Someone asked, "O Allah's Apostle This (ordinary) fire would have been sufficient (to torture the unbelievers)," Allah's Apostle said, "The (Hell) Fire has 69 parts more than the ordinary (worldly) fire, each part is as hot as this (worldly) fire."
But the real point of 'fire' is to use its heat, to torture Infidels, Jews and Christians. Non-Moslems are fodder for the fire. This is called Moslem charity.
That he heard the Prophet on the pulpit reciting:-- "They will cry: "O Malik!' (43.77) (Malik is the gate-keeper (angel) of the (Hell) Fire.)”
Surely the mainstream media, quackademics and Moslem lovers know their Malik? 'They' in 4:488 are of course the hated Jews and Christians. 'O Malik' is their cry for mercy. Malik in Islamic liturgy is the door keeper of Hell, and he is a part of the 'magnificent 19' who were enshrined in Islamic lore by the 19 perpetrators of 9-11. These 19 angels including Malik will watch over and guard Moslems, but they will destroy or toss into the hell-fire Jews and Christians.
it [gates to hell] are nineteen. And We have not made the guardians
of the Fire except angels.
And We have made
their number only as a trial for the unbelievers
- in order that the People
of the Book may be certain and that the believers may increase in
and so that the People of the Book and the believers would not doubt,
and that those in
whose hearts is a disease and the unbelievers would say, 'What
example does Allah intend by this?'
Thus does Allah leave to stray whom he pleases and guides whom He
pleases. And none can know the soldiers of your Lord except He. And
this is nothing other than a warning to mankind."
[Muddaththir, 74: 30-31]
Malik and the other 19 will get rid of the Unbelievers, who are 'diseased'. 'Peoples of the Book' are doomed to eternal hellfire. This is why they will cry out to Malik asking for mercy. None will be given.
Australian historian Paul Collins in his work The Birth of The West makes the claim that the 10th century formed European identity and was based upon the firm foundation of both Christianity and Romanic-Gallic culture. There is little to dispute this claim. The antecedents of the 10th century European expansion, in which by 1000 AD Europe was supreme in every aspect of world affairs, was of course laid much earlier. Yet the 10th century was crucial to the creation of the modern world – a fact which by itself destroys the idea that Islam or any other pagan-totalitarian culture created much of anything.
Between the takeover of the Roman empire by Germanic groups [there was no fall], and the Moslem invasions [which led to a contraction absurdly called by Marxist-Enlightenment theologians as a Dark Age]; European culture became an admixture of the old [Roman-Greek] and the new [Christian-Rational]. As Collins relates:
“Boethius (ca. 475–ca. 526), a brilliant philosopher, politician, and translator of Aristotle, who exercised the strongest influence on medieval education. He was interested in the Quadrivium, and his translations of Aristotle’s logical and mathematical works and his own theological works were used for the next millennium. The final influence on medieval education was Bishop Isidore of Seville (ca. 560–636), who studied at the cathedral school of Seville in the Visigothic period a century before the Muslim invasion. Like Gerbert, [Pope Sylvester II], he was fascinated by knowledge and compiled the Etymologiae... “
In the 10th century a Pope and polymath born in poverty became a standard bearer for European success and progress. Pope Sylvester II was an inventor, musician, astronomer, writer, mathematician and a reforming theologian. Men like Sylvester are not formed in 'dark ages'. It might be remarked that weak Popes like the current Francis, are. Sylvester and other well educated clergy knew all about Aristotle [who was usually wrong] and ancient learning, some of it useful, much of it not.
“...influenced by Boethius’s De arithmatica is clear from his correspondence with his friend Constantine of Fleury concerning superparticular numbers, the arithmetic relationship of two sequential numbers where the dividend equals the divisor plus one. [Pope Sylvester II] Gerbert’s interest here was derived from music; such calculations are useful in understanding harmony.”
“Gerbert also taught logic and rhetoric, introducing students to “the poets with whom he thought they ought to be made acquainted, expounding and teaching the poets Virgil, Statius and Terence, the satirists Juvenal, Persius and Horace, and the historian Lucan. When the students had been familiarized with these authors and trained in the modes of expression, he promoted them to the study of rhetoric.” Gerbert wrote a commentary on Aristotle and was very much influenced by Cicero, who linked rhetoric to integrity of character.”
What does Collins say about Christianity and the modern world today? He correctly surmises that a post-Christian world will lead to decline, but that we are not yet there. The reason is that Christianity is so embedded into reason, science, culture, laws and mores; that it is difficult to expunge from the Western consciousness.
“Our culture was born in the tenth century. The driving force of that birth was Western Christianity, more specifically Catholicism. The church was the cohesive driver that bound together the disparate elements that make up our cultural inheritance and was the energy that drove the process forward. Today we stand at a crossroads in Western culture, caught up as we are in a seemingly inexorable movement toward globalism, multiculturalism, and internationalism. There is a strong impetus today to deny our cultural roots altogether, or at least to pretend that we live in a kind of “post-Christian [world]”.
Collins is right, even if he is a little optimistic. Cultural Marxism, multiculturalism, the fetishes of relativity, sexual confusion, militant ascientific Atheism [from nothing there is everything], Islam-Is-Peace [so too was Communism and Nazism]; amongst other cult doctrines [plant food causes weather so save us almighty state]; have the ability to create a post-Christian world. Looking around at reality it is rather evident that this anti-Western culture is in the ascendant. It does not bode well for the future.
Western lamestream, lamebrain media are always shocked when Moslems, quoting the Koran, perform deeds of barbarism worthy of their Arab-Moslem ancestors. The big brains are quick to assert that these Moslems are not really Moslems just angry impoverished freedom fighters who enjoy cutting off heads, raping women, selling Christian girls into sex-slavery and demolishing non Moslem artefacts, monuments, churches and villages. Political Imams rush to assure the peasants that they know the Koran better than the Koran worshipping moon cult devotees and that Islam preaches love of women, Christians, Jews and a respect for non-Moslem culture. The reality of 1400 years is of course precisely the opposite.
Non-Muslims cannot own Muslim slaves. Ali-ilah would never approve of this. However, Moslems are given the right to own slaves, and some 10 million Whites and 15 million Blacks were enslaved by the Meccan moon cult in 1400 years. Many good books recount this slave trade in Whites and Blacks by Moslems.
“O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those [slaves] whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and the daughters of your paternal aunts, and the daughters of your maternal uncles and the daughters of your maternal aunts who fled with you; and a believing woman if she gave herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet desired to marry her -- specially for you, not for the (rest of) believers; We know what We have ordained for them concerning their wives and those whom their right hands possess in order that no blame may attach to you; and Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.”
Women are slaves for Moslem men. Sex slaves if they are Infidel women. Polygamous slaves if they are Moslem women. Daughters are slaughtered if they disobey the Father.
Women are stupid!
Nazism and Islam are the 2 most anti-Christian cults in history. Islam is in part, a cult dedicated to the extirpation of Christians. Jihad and Christianophobia is clearly identified in the Koran, in over 1600 verses, as being a 'pillar' of the cult.
Eradicating the Jew is another great plank in the Moslem cult's platform. Racism redounds in Mein Koran, eclipsing the Jew-hate one finds in Mein Kampf. Jews are apes or pigs, destined to be slaughtered in this life and burning in hell in the next.
Say: "Shall I point out to you something much worse than this, (as judged) by the treatment it received from God? those who incurred the curse of God and His wrath, those of whom some He transformed into apes and swine, those who worshipped evil; - these are (many times) worse in rank, and far more astray from the even path!"
Those who reject our Signs, We shall soon cast into the Fire: as often as their skins are roasted through, We shall change them for fresh skins, that they may taste the penalty: for God is Exalted in Power, Wise.
And on the Day that the Unbelievers will be placed before the Fire, (It will be said to them): "Ye received your good things in the life of the world, and ye took your pleasure out of them: but today shall ye be recompensed with a Penalty of humiliation: for that ye were arrogant on earth without just cause, and that ye (ever) transgressed."
As a leader he was a totalitarian pagan-fascist in the true sense of those words. The Koran – his invention – is garbled, intolerant, Jihadic, contradictory and tautologically irrational. In Muhammad's deranged mind he is the Allah thing.
Quackademics, Western political Imams, the lamestream media will never tell you the truth about the intolerant, fascist Jihadic cult of Mecca. I daresay most Moslems are just as ignorant.
Non Moslem women and female children are by Sharia and Koranic law; open for rape, sex-slavery and harem duty. Muhammad's exalted example makes this clear. Non Moslem women are sex toys which the 'right hand' of Moslem men 'own' and can do with as they please. Islam is in part, a sex cult for male Moslems. As written before a woman in Islam is a thing, not a human.
Worse the Koran openly advocates sex with pre-pubescent slave girls and sex with slave girls is encouraged: Koranic verses 4.3, 4.24, 23.6, 33.50 & 70.30 allow a Muslim man to have sex with slave girls. A slave girl can be bought or acquired by killing infidels and capturing their wives and daughters.
Why then is anyone but Western Marxists surprised that ISIS following Koranic 'law' is selling NON-MOSLEM girls under the age of 10 into sex slavery.
IBT Times: 'Shocking' that ISIS is selling little girls for up to $170 as Sex slaves....
An insightful look into 10th century Europe. It is my contention that by 900 AD Europe was the richest, best-fed, best-educated and most agriculturally productive geographic entity in the world. It was 'Christendom' which formed the modern world, developed technology and science, and allowed freedom to come to the fore of the political-economy. Free-will, free-association, freedom of speech, free assembly, and the mandate to use rationality only arose in Christendom – no where else.
Collins would likely agree with this assessment. Some interesting facts from the 10th century on why and how Christendom saved the world.
in the tenth century probably less than 25 percent of European land was owned by the church and monastic orders and that kings and magnates controlled 40 percent or more. Ordinary people owned about 30 to 35 percent, but the constant insecurity and chaos meant that they were still subservient to the local strongman because they needed his protection.
The Secular state was always more powerful than the Church and incessantly desired its subservience to state power.
Italy seems to have been an irresistibly attractive prize for the Germans. It was not only the warmer climate and brighter light, the economic prosperity and the developed resources, particularly in northern Italy, that attracted them. It was also the influence the emperors could exercise over the papacy, which indirectly gave them even more power over the church in Germany.
and: retaining their educational role, monasteries in the ninth century had become increasingly secularized owing to their social and economic clout. Patrick J. Corish points out, “They became associated with the established major dynasties, and in consequence became centers of secular power.....Monastic armies fought with kings and against kings.
Yet the benefices of monasticism, Church technological developments, public and court schools, medicine, hospitals and even the idea of peace-days in which war was outlawed, all added magnificently to the heritage and expansion of Christendom.
Irish monks who “saved civilization” and learning in the West, a project that continued through the Carolingian period and on into the tenth century. The ability to reform itself was one of monasticism’s great strengths, and one of the great reforms of Western monasticism emanated from the monastery of Cluny in southern Burgundy and spread across Western Europe in the tenth and eleventh centuries.
Irish monks preserved Latin and Greek learning well before the great days of Muslim al-Andalus, and these same monks, from the seventh century onward, spread that learning and culture across Continental Europe and England via their missionary work.
And what of the poverty of the Moslem-fascist political project in Spain?
In traditional Islam there was no clear separation of what today we would call religion and the state. The key question of who should lead the community was left unanswered. At first the caliphs saw themselves as the successors of Muhammad. They claimed “to be khalifat allāh....vice regents of God. They assumed the protection and endowment of Muslim worship, the organization of mosques and the defence of the pilgrimage. They claimed authority in legal and doctrinal...
Islam, isolated and convinced of its own superiority, felt it had nothing to learn from Christian Europe. We will return to this knowledge transmission when we consider Gerbert of Aurillac. All of this suggests the need for a more nuanced appreciation of al-Andalus. In the end the greatness of Moorish Spain was something of a mixed blessing.
al-Andalus simply wasn’t the kind of tolerant paradise that Lewis imagines, especially for Christians. It was a highly stratified society with a strict demarcation of roles, including for a period the wearing of identifying badges for Jews and Christians. Mozarabic Catholics were cowed, second-class citizens in what had originally been their own country.
Catholics and Jews were constantly reminded of their second-class status. They were dhimmi, “protected ones,” or “people of the book.” Dhimmi were granted a special residential status to live in Muslim-dominated countries in return for paying jizya, a poll and land tax. Generally, there was no outright persecution of Christians until the time of the vicious dictator al-Mansūr (976–1002).
the hadith (sayings ascribed to Muhammad) says, as “the one who fights for the faith of Allah” than of actually gaining territory. Over the course of Abd al-Rahmān’s campaigns against the Christians, he achieved some victories. One Moorish chronicler says that after a battle in July 920 at Valdejunquera, southwest of Pamplona, there were so many heads of the Christian dead to take back to Córdoba to set up around the city walls that the mule trains could not carry them.
War, plunder and 'booty' are common themes in Mein Koran and Mein Hadith. The Hadith by Bukhari are especially interested in the distribution of spoils from the Moslem Jihad. Muhammad often-times remarked [according to these Hadith], that Allah or Baal the Lord [ilah] of Mecca; had made pillage and plunder 'legal' for Moslems. Muhammad of course always took 'his fair share', as demanded by his family deity Baal [Allah]. How convenient.
Plunder is legal and Muhammad's miracle confirms it.
So, the prophet carried out the expedition and when he reached that town at the time or nearly at the time of the 'Asr prayer, he said to the sun, 'O sun! You are under Allah's Order and I am under Allah's Order O Allah! Stop it (i.e. the sun) from setting.' It was stopped till Allah made him victorious.
....The Prophet added: Then Allah saw our weakness and disability, so he made booty legal for us."
Save some of the plunder for future generations of moon-cult followers:
'Umar said, "Were it not for those Muslims who have not come to existence yet, I would have distributed (the land of) every town I conquer among the fighters as the Prophet distributed the land of Khaibar."
Fight not just for booty, but most importantly for Allah and Muhammad.
Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ashari:
A bedouin asked the Prophet, "A man may fight for the sake of booty, and another may fight so that he may be mentioned by the people, and a third may fight to show his position (i.e. bravery); which of these regarded as fighting in Allah's Cause?" The Prophet said, "He who fights so that Allah's Word (i.e. Islam) should be superior, fights for Allah's Cause."
Muhammad's family gets special attention and exemptions when it comes to Jihad and booty.
Narrated Ibn 'Umar:
'Uthman did not join the Badr battle because he was married to one of the daughters of Allah's Apostle and she was ill. So, the Prophet said to him. "You will get a reward and a share (from the war booty) similar to the reward and the share of one who has taken part in the Badr battle."
Convert to Muhammad's cult and reap the rewards.
Narrated Marwan bin Al-Hakim and Miswar bin Makhrama:
When the Hawazin delegation came to Allah's Apostle after they had embraced Islam and requested him to return their properties and war prisoners to them, Allah's Apostle said, "To me the best talk is the truest, so you may choose either of two things; the war prisoners or the wealth, for I have delayed their distribution."
How generous of the great man Muhammad.
It should be noted however, that Prophets of a 'religion' do not lead war expeditions, rape, murder, steal and distribute the profits made from war. Nice cult Islam.
Moslem geniuses and their massive-big brain friends in the West, most of whom have never read Mein Koran or Mein Hadith; usually reference 2 Koranic sources to prove that Islam is peace. The first Koranic resource is 2:256 or the no-compulsion in religion apocrypha. If you bother to read the entirety of chapter 2, you will find out that their is plenty of compulsion in Islam. The quoted sentence fragment in 2:256 is followed by a long sordid denunciation of those who deny Islam. Chapter or Sura 2 is one of the most intolerant in the Koran and targets Christians and Jews for destruction. Witness 2:257
A second verse trotted out by the huge minds is 5:32. Sura 5 like Sura 2, is a long screed of hate-speech and intolerance. But enormous minds with Phds pull out this little fragment and declare that the 1600 verses of Koranic hate speech are per-force null and void.
Here is 5:32: “On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone slew a person - unless it be in retaliation for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew all mankind: and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all humanity.”
Tears on my pillow. 'Spreading mischief in the land', means opposing Islam, denying Muhammad, disbelief that Baal the ilah of Mecca, is 'god'. 'Spreading mischief in the land', means defending yourself against Moslems, fighting the Jihad, and even criticizing Muhammad's cult. Ergo killing those who are 'spreading mischief' is fine.
Anyone who has read Mein Koran knows that Infidel life is not held to be sacred. Infidels, including the old, women and children, can be killed if they oppose Islam or 'spread mischief in the land'.
Sayid ibn Jubayr who lived at the time of Muhammad, and was a companion of Ayesha), said:
Sentient people must wonder why Moslem women and children go on Jihad to kill the Infidel ape and pig? Or why Moslems slaughter Infidel women, children, the aged, the crippled, the defenceless? Here is why. A 'scholarly' Shafi’i manual of Islamic law states this about Jihad:
“Jihad is also (personally) obligatory for everyone (able to perform it, male or Female, old or young) when the enemy has surrounded the Muslims… A woman too has a choice between fighting or surrendering if she is certain that she will not be subjected to an indecent act if captured. If uncertain that she will be safe from such an act, she is obliged to fight, and surrender is not permissible).”
Jihad is an obligation within Islam even for women and as stated below, children. A sixth pillar of the cult. A fact lost on quackademics, media personalities and sundry experts. From the same Shafi'i manual we learn:
Those called (to perform jihad when it is a command obligation) are every able-bodied man who has reached puberty and is sane. (p. 601)
There are rules of Jihad. For example Moslems must kill children, monks and old men of the infidel, if they are fighting Moslems:
It is not permissible (in jihad) to kill women or children unless they are fighting against the Muslims. Nor is it permissible to kill animals, unless they are being ridden into battle against the Muslims, or killing them will help defeat the enemy. It is permissible to kill old men (old man (shaykh) meaning someone more than forty years of age) and monks. (p. 603)
The 'great brains' of Islamic liturgy, the 'geniuses' who saved the world from a 'Dark Age' which never occurred, concur that not only can women and children participate in Jihad, but Muslims are also permitted to kill those innocents, aged, unarmed monks and women and children who fight against them. Within Islamic jurisprudence war is not the only method Infidel apes and pigs use to fight Moslems. Criticizing the cult, defaming Muhammad, querying the Koran, not following Sharia, or disobeying an Imam is also considered 'fighting against Moslems'.
Ibn Taymiyya (d. 1328), was a famous Hanbali jurist who was also called Shaykh-ul-Islam. This supposed Muslim 'scholar' had this to say about the obligatory fact of Jihad:
"Since lawful warfare is essentially jihad and since its aim is that the religion is God’s entirely and God’s word is uppermost, therefore according to all Muslims, those who stand in the way of this aim must be fought. As for those who cannot offer resistance or cannot fight, such as women, children, monks, old people, the blind, handicapped and their likes, they shall not be killed unless they actually fight with words (e.g. by propaganda) and acts (e.g. by spying or otherwise assisting in the warfare)." (Ibn Taymiyyah, in Rudolph Peters, "Jihad in Classical and Modern Islam", [Princeton, NJ.: Markus Wiener, 1996], p. 4 source)
A justifiable Jihad in Islam, includes fighting against anyone who dares to oppose the Moslem cult with weapons, force, words, criticisms, questions, or even indifference to Sharia Law. This broad definition of 'fighting' allows Moslems, with impunity, divinely guided by the moon deity, to slaughter whomever they wish.
Nice cult Islam.
The cult of Islam or Submission is of course a violent non-religious, largely political-social movement. Its founder Muhammad was soaked in blood, sex-slavery, brigandage, theft, Jihad and murder. Consider the following from Bukhari's Hadith, Book 4.
Fight the Infidels, venerate the martyrs:
The people of the tribes of Ril, Dhakwan, 'Usiya and Bani Lihyan came to the Prophet and claimed that they had embraced Islam, and they requested him to support them with some men to fight their own people. The Prophet supported them with seventy men from the Ansar whom we used to call Al-Qurra'(i.e. Scholars) who (out of piety) used to cut wood during the day and pray all the night. So, those people took the (seventy) men till they reached a place called Bi'r-Ma'ana where they betrayed and martyred them. So, the Prophet invoked evil on the tribe of Ril, Dhakwan and Bani Lihyan for one month in the prayer.
a Quranic Verse concerning those martyrs which was:-- "O Allah! Let our people be informed on our behalf that we have met our Lord Who has got pleased with us and made us pleased." Then the Verse was cancelled.
Notice the abrogation of the Koranic verse. If Allah, the moon deity, wrote the Koran and it is the word of 'God' why then are there so many abrogations or cancellations of his or its, divine utterances ?
Muhammad conquers and administers:
Narrated Abu Talha:
Whenever the Prophet conquered some people, he would stay in their town for three days.
It would take 3 days [the usual time frame at this period in history], to loot, plunder and set up an oppressive ruling regime.
Muhammad was very focused on plunder and pillage:
The Prophet performed 'Umra, setting out from Al-Jarana where he distributed the war booty of Hunain.
Mecca was conquered by the 'prophet' at the head of a 10.000 man army. Pagans were slaughtered and the 359 non-Baal idols of the Kabaa shrine, including statues of Mary and Jesus, were demolished. Allah or Baal uber alles.
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
The Prophet said, on the day of the Conquest of Mecca, "There is no migration (after the Conquest), but Jihad and good intentions, and when you are called for Jihad, you should immediately respond to the call."
Muhammad encourages the murder of one of his many enemies:
Narrated Sad bin 'Ubaida:
...The Prophet believed him. 'Umar said, 'Allow me to chop off his (i.e. Hatib's) neck as he has done hypocrisy.' The Prophet said, (to 'Umar), 'Who knows, perhaps Allah has looked at the warriors of Badr and said (to them), 'Do whatever you like, for I have forgiven you.' " 'Abdur-Rahman added, "So this is what encouraged him (i.e. Ali)."
Jihad is normal, a duty, and to be exalted in prayer.
When the Prophet returned (from Jihad), he would say Takbir thrice and add, "We are returning, if Allah wishes, with repentance and worshipping and praising (our Lord) and prostrating ourselves before our Lord. Allah fulfilled His Promise and helped His Slave, and He Alone defeated the (infidel) clans."
Nice cult Islam.
Booty was 'reserved' by Baal, or Allah, for his only apostle, the sainted Muhammad. Muhammad's family deity was Baal, whose shrine the slaves of Allah took care of [Muhammad Abdullah or slave of Allah or the Lord of Mecca, or Baal]. The only man in history who was sanctioned by divine grace, to receive the plunder of war, was apparently Muhammad. He said so. On behalf of Baal his family's shrine. Makes sense right? Don't all prophets lead a Jihad, murder, plunder, pillage and cloak themselves in gold and silver?
Bukhari tells us:
Narrated Jabir bin Abdullah:
Allah's Apostle said, "Booty has been made legal for me."
20% of all plunder was to be given to Allah and his 'apostle'. How convenient.
...Allah bestowed on His Apostle with a special favor of something of this Fai (booty) which he gave to nobody else." 'Umar then recited the Holy Verses: "What Allah bestowed as (Fai) Booty on his Apostle (Muhammad) from them --- for this you made no expedition with either cavalry or camelry: But Allah gives power to His Apostles over whomever He will 'And Allah is able to do all things." 9:6)
Allah guarantees Muhammad a share of the spoils.
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas:
The delegates of the tribe of 'Abdul-Qais came and said, "O Allah's Apostle! We are from the tribe of Rabi'a, and there is the infidels of the tribe of Mudar intervening between you and us, so we cannot come to you except in the Sacred Months. ..The Prophet said, "I order you (to do) four (things) and forbid you (to do) four: ...pay the Khumus (i.e. one-fifth) of the war booty to Allah.. (See Hadith No. 50, Vol. 1).
Muhammad of course would take his fair share of 'Allah's Booty'.
Nice cult Islam.
The Hadith are the 2nd most important work in Islamic liturgical theology. Many Moslem 'scholars' [apologists, propagandists] have declared them to be divinely written. Sharia Law is based in part on these Hadith or commentary about the life of Muhammad. Rather odd then that they contain adjurations to kill innocent children of the Infidel.
A noted Moslem 'scholar' and expert, Prof. Ahmad Hasan in his acclaimed work, Sunan Abu Dawud, English translation Volume II, on p. 739; 1984, states:
“2018. This tradition allows to kill women and children of the infidels in the Battle. The other traditions indicate that it is prohibited to kill women and children in the battle. These contradictory traditions have been reconciled by saying that the tradition of al-Sa‘b b. Jaththamah has been abrogated. The other interpretation is that it is allowable to kill women and children when the settlements of the infidels are attacked at night, as they cannot be distinguished from the fighting men in the dark.”
Muslim in his Hadith confirms that murdering innocent children of the Infidel, in the name of the Allah-thing, is expected, since Muhammad murdered them during raids - at night.
It is reported on the authority of Sa'b b. Jaththama that the Prophet of Allah, when asked about the women and children of the polytheists being killed during the night raid, said: They are from them. (Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4321)
It is narrated by Sa'b b. Jaththama that he said (to the Holy Prophet): Messenger of Allah, we kill the children of the polytheists during the night raids. He said: They are from them. (Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4322)
Sa'b b. Jaththama has narrated that the Prophet (may peace be upon him) asked: What about the children of polytheists killed by the cavalry during the night raid? He said: They are from them. (Sahih Muslim, Book 019, Number 4323)
Muhammad sometimes did not murder the children but just the old men of the Infidel polytheists:
Samurah ibn Jundub:
The Prophet (peace_be_upon_him) said: Kill the old men who are polytheists, but spare their children. (Sunan Abu Dawud, Book 14, Number 2664)
Bukhari seems to believe that murdering the women and children of the Infidel ape and pig is justified and glorious and part of the Muhammadan tradition.
“19:4457 - The Messenger of Allah used not to kill the children, so you should not kill them unless you could distinguish between a child who would grow up to be a believer and a child who would grow up to be a non-believer, so that you killed the prospective non-believer and left the prospective believer alive.”
When Moslems say that Islam does not condone the murder of Christians and other polytheists they are either liars or completely ignorant of their own cult.
A buyer's guide to the stupidity of moral relativity and Islam:
Islam means submission to Allah and Muhammad and the denial of free-will, freedom, and actions not sanctioned by the Koran. Ergo slavery to Muhammad-Allah means freedom.
Islam denigrates the female, dresses them up in bed-sheets, allows polygamy, stoning of women, dis-honour murders and rape of Infidel females and sex-slavery. Ergo Islam liberates the female.
Islam is a racist, Jew-hating precursor of Nazism. If you identify Islam as racist, then you are the racist. Ergo the Moslem cult is tolerant.
Mein Kampf is an Arab-Moslem best-seller and the Koran openly states that Jews must be killed. Ergo Moslems have no interest in Nazi theology and fascism.
Islam demands the eradication of Christians and Christianity, and the forcible conversion of Christians to Muhammad's cult. Ergo, Islam tolerates the 'people of the book'.
There have been 25.000 Moslem attacks just since 9-11. Ergo Islam is peace.
The Moslem Jihad from 632 AD until the Crusades in 1096 AD, wiped out Christianity from Arabia to Southern France, culled millions of sex and labour slaves from Europe; forcibly converted millions more, pulled down 30.000 churches; and slaughtered well over a million Christians in battle and through death-via-slavery. Ergo the Crusades are to blame for the Moslem jihad.
When Moslems cause 'terror' in Western cities, the main concern is not the Moslem Jihad, or its victims, but Islamophobia [or Naziophobia] since Moslem mayhem is only one part of 'society's overall violence issue'. Ergo Moslems are not the problem, but non-Moslems are the real issue.
Eventually Moslems will blow up the centre [again] of a major Western city. The response from the elite, politicians, the quackademics, the media and other useless parasites will be:
-Islam is not to blame
-All Moslems are moderate
-The West is to blame
-Moslems are the victims
-What about blacks killing blacks in Chicago anyways ?
A world of lower education leads to this.
Memorize this Mein Koranic verse. It summarizes the entire program of the Moslem Meccan Moon cult:
“Indeed, the penalty for those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger and strive upon earth [to cause] corruption is none but that they be killed or crucified or that their hands and feet be cut off from opposite sides or that they be exiled from the land. That is for them a disgrace in this world; and for them in the Hereafter is a great punishment.” (Qur’an 5:33)
ISIS, which is simply following the Koran, has enacted 5:33 killing thousands of non-Moslems and what they deem to be Islamic apostates. The Turks confirm the recent slaughter of 700 less than pious enough Moslems.
Washington Post – a chief MSM apologist for the moon cult writes:
“REYHANLI, Turkey — The cost of turning against the Islamic State was made brutally apparent in the streets of a dusty backwater town in eastern Syria in early August. Over a three-day period, vengeful fighters shelled, beheaded, crucified and shot hundreds of members of the Shaitat tribe after they dared to rise up against the extremists.
By the time the killing stopped, 700 people were dead, activists and survivors say, making this the bloodiest single atrocity committed by the Islamic State in Syria since it declared its existence 18 months ago.”
But remember, the murder of non-Moslems and less-than-pious Moslems, by those professing an 'Islamic State' and who are following the Koran and Hadith and the example of mad Muhammad, has nothing to do with the 'real' Islam. At least for idiots.
Huge brains tell us that Islam has nothing to do with Jew-hate, Jew-murder or terror against the Infidel 'ape and pig'. This is why Bukhari faithfully recorded Fuehrer Muhammad's following actions.
Muhammad and terror:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been sent with the shortest expressions bearing the widest meanings, and I have been made victorious with terror (cast in the hearts of the enemy), and while I was sleeping, the keys of the treasures of the world were brought to me and put in my hand." Abu Huraira added: Allah's Apostle has left the world and now you, people, are bringing out those treasures (i.e. the Prophet did not benefit by them).
Muhammad says only Moslems go to paradise, the rest are damned:
Narrated Abu Huraira:
We were in the company of Allah's Apostle in a Ghazwa, and he remarked about a man who claimed to be a Muslim, saying, "This (man) is from the people of the (Hell) Fire." When the battle started, the man fought violently till he got wounded. Somebody said, "O Allah's Apostle! The man whom you described as being from the people of the (Hell) Fire fought violently today and died." The Prophet said, "He will go to the (Hell) Fire." Some people were on the point of doubting (the truth of what the Prophet had said) while they were in this state, suddenly someone said that he was still alive but severely wounded. When night fell, he lost patience and committed suicide. The Prophet was informed of that, and he said, "Allah is Greater! I testify that I am Allah's Slave and His Apostle." Then he ordered Bilal to announce amongst the people: 'None will enter Paradise but a Muslim, and Allah may support this religion (i.e. Islam) even with a disobedient man.'
Phd's earnestly explain that when Muhammad says that Islam means Jihad, war, terror, killing and murder, and that paradise is reserved only for Moslems; it has nothing to do with Islam. When Hitler gassed 5 million Catholics for being sub-human and not believing in his divinity and the 'science' of evolution, that too had nothing to do with National Socialism.
David Wood and the top 10 Koranic verses of hate speech against (David Wood and the top 10 Koranic verses of hate speech against 'Unbelievers': Probably the best 8 minute video...
The importance of Christianity in the development of Western civilisation.
Jihad is an obligation to wage war against non-Moslems. This is why the Moslem cult is so violent. (Jihad is an obligation to wage war against non-Moslems.: Jihad is an Arabic word which sends the multi-cult into...
Bukhari (Bukhari's Hadiths: 2nd half of volume 1 - the incitement to violence and supremacism: A list of violent Hadiths... http://t.co/46K72iYUsh)
Bukhari (Bukhari's Hadiths: First half of volume 1 - the incitement to violence and supremacism: A list of violent Hadiths...
Conservative philosopher Roger Scruton delivers the keynote address at the IPA's 2014 Foundations of Western Civilisation Symposium.
Shocking video! An Islamic Muslim woman (a Palestinian from Hamas controlled territory in Gaza), whose child received and needed medical care in Israel, was ...
Critics argue that India does not have Muslims by the name of Sulaiman ibn Ahmad is a last resort to attack his credibility. Now Hebrew word ben or ibn in Ar...
There is nothing new about religious fascism or caliphates. There is nothing new about rape, infanticide, honor killings, genocide, misogyny, slavery -- or headless journalism either.
There is absolutely nothing in the video of Rev. Robby Gallaty's recent sermon that is threatening, hateful, cruel, or the result of ignorance.
The Allah thing - aka Muhammad - hates Christians Koranic supremacism.
Christianophobia – Islam
"Christians must choose "Islam or death," while their women and daughters may legitimately be regarded as wives of Muslims" The enemedia's criminal silence on the relentless and bloody march of Islamic surpremacists on the backs and the bodies...
Answering the cult from a Christian perspective: What to say to Muslims, Jehovah Witnesses, Mormans, The New Age and others.
Idiots Guide to Islam http://alrassoolilive.blogspot.com/
Christianophobia – Islam
Christianophobia – Islam
Raping and torturing young girls.....isn't that what all intolerant cults do ?
It's time to wake up. The real muslims are the terrorist who are following the teachings within the quran. We are not the one's who say they are killing in t...
Nearly two years after the “Arab Spring” began in Egypt, the nation’s Muslim Brotherhood president has arrogated to himself dictatorial powers, and is ramming through a new constitution that will effectively extinguish the last vestiges of Egyptian democracy and establish Egypt as a Sharia state. Just as I said back in January 2011, when the uprisings against Mubarak began, for the people in Egypt who had real power to affect change, the “Arab Spring” was never about democracy and pluralism, despite the ululations of the Western press; it was always about imposing Islamic law upon Egypt. And now, with the new constitution, here we are.
These are not the regular beatings and vandalism against Christians, Hindus and Buddhists but religion-oriented attacks in which someone dies at the hand of a member of the”religion of peace.”
Have you done your shopping yet? It’s Hatred and Violence in the Qur’an Awareness Month — what better time to buy a bomb vest for the mujahid you love?
Inspired by a remark from Pat Condell in this video, I have proclaimed December to be Hatred and Violence in the Qur’an Awareness Month. After all, November was Islamophobia Awareness Month, and certainly the hatred and violence in the Qur’an kills many, many more people than “Islamophobia” ever has or ever will, and so it is far more deserving than “Islamophobia” of a month of its own.