Contrary to mainstream opinion, Islam of itself, by itself, invented little to nothing. Only in astrology can we find some contributions from Arab-Moslems or Persian-Moslems. In everything else it was either the Dhimmi population with Moslem names who carried on progress – stunted as it was under a dogmatic fascism post 1000 AD – or nothing occurred. Why wasn't the blast furnace, optical lenses, the scientific method, chimneys, modern mirrors, gravity-based machines, water mills, or wind mills created in Dar-al-Islam ? Innovation is not embraced that is why.
From Imam Bukhari's chapter on Ihtisam I learnt that innovation was anti-Islamic. The concept is called Bid'ah or a new thing. Muhammad commanded his followers to be knaves and slaves following his orders.
“…so cling to my Sunnah and the Sunnah of the rightly guided caliphsafter me, even if it be with your teeth” [Bukhari]
[شرالامور محدثاتھا وکل بدعھ ضلالھ۔۔۔]
And among the worst deeds is to invent new things and every innovation is misguidance. [source]
This is clearly a problem for Islam. Innovation is not to be embraced.
Moslems now of course 'parse' the word 'Bid'ah' to give it 2 meanings, namely, 'good innovation' and 'bad innovation'. But these modern appellations are not what you find in Mein Hadith from Bukhari, nor indeed in Mein Koran. What the reader finds in the foundational texts are commands to follow Muhammad's every word, deed and path or Sunnah. In this vein Muhammad supersedes Jesus Christ who told his followers 'I am the way' and 'No one gets to the Father but through me'. Thus Christology is replaced with Muhammadology. And this is definitely part of the Koran's main and central themes. Muhammad usurps Christ.
In Bukhari's Hadith and in the writings of many other Imam's there is the story of Muhammad and his friends, sitting around, making promises to the Allah-thing [Baal the moon deity]. The 'great man' Muhammad was listening. One of his friends apparently said: 'I will make prayers (Salaah) all night long.' A second promised: 'I will fast (sawm) all the time.' The third offered: 'I will never marry.' Muhammad was unimpressed. Apparently he stated: 'I am the most God conscious of Allah (Ta`ala) than any of you. I pray (Salaah,) I fast (sawm) as well, and I do marry woman too. And who so turns his face from my Sunnah, cannot be of my Ummah'.
If you don't follow my way, you cannot be in my community. The implication is clear. Don't do anything that I have not commanded or allowed. In other words, innovations in and around the Koran, Hadith, ritual, practices or culture are not permitted in Islam. This indicates that those hoping for an Islamic Reformation are deluded.
Bukhari's Hadith chapter Ihtisam goes even further into neutering innovation. He writes that innovations make a person a Murtad (a non believer.) A few examples given are a person claiming to be a Prophet, deny giving Zakaat [centralized tax to the Moslem state], performing the pilgrimage [Hajj] at a place other than the Ka'ba shrine in Mecca, or to introduce any other new belief which is in opposition to Qur'an or Ahadith. In other words the entire corpus of Christianity makes its followers Murtad, and by Koranic definition they must be killed [see Suras, 9, 5, 4, 8 and 2].
Bid'ah is a 'law' which prohibits any idea from being implement, which is contrary to the Koran, or the way of Muhammad. This ossifies the cult of Islam and paralyses it. No Giotto, no Vivaldi, no invention of steam or combustion, no innovations in medicine, chemistry or electro-magnetism. No art to speak of. Simply the theft of other civilization's artifacts and the pronouncement that 'Moslems did it'. Meagre, pathetic, untutored.
It is a pity that ex Pope Benedict stepped down. There is a qualitative and quantitative difference in intellect, theology and reason between Benedict and his successor Francis. Benedict is one of the great Popes of reason and intelligence. He was a philosopher, thinker, teacher and theologian. A man who knew Christianity better than any Church theologian since Aquinas. He understood the threads of culture and philosophy which made Christianity possible, along with the eternal truths expressed in the Old and New Testaments. Benedict reflected, rationalized and proved Christianity. From that platform he would evangelize what to him was obvious – Christianity is the only way. In this vein he had no qualms about calling Islam what it is – a cult.
Francis is entirely different. He is a man focused on living the gospel. In his worldview Christianity must be simple, less rational, and less interested in 'why' than what Benedict had discussed. Faith for Francis is confirmed through simplicity in living, caring for the poor, and toleration of all. The gospel is your life. Francis illustrates the emotional, simplified faith of Christianity expressed in deeds and simple piety. Worry not about the details of why, how, or what caused something. Live the life of St. Francis of Assisi and all shall be good. He is in many way's the opposite of Benedict.
I much prefer Benedict. One cannot argue against the virtues of Francis or of his creed of simple poverty and aid to all. Christianity however, is of two parts – the rational and the spiritual. Discard one for the other, and you lose your faith. Retreat into the cave to meditate on spiritual matters and the solitary expression of that piety will likely die with you. Engage only in rationalization of faith and the great immaterial world of the spirit, of emotion, of hope, of miracles and the beauty of the world is discarded and lost. Benedict knew this. From his great book, 'Introduction to Christianity':
“...religion is not to be found along the solitary path of the mystic but only in the community of proclaiming and hearing. Man’s conversation with God and men’s conversation with one another are mutually necessary and interdependent.”
“Christianity is not a system of knowledge but a way. The believers’ “We” is not a secondary addition for small minds; in a certain sense it is the matter itself—the community with one’s fellowmen is a reality that lies on a different plane from that of the mere “idea”. If Platonism provides an idea of the truth, Christian belief offers truth as a way, and only by becoming a way has it become man’s truth.”
“...thirteenth century the great Franciscan theologian Bonaventure felt obliged to reproach his colleagues of the philosophical faculty at Paris with having learned how to measure the world but having forgotten how to measure themselves. Let us repeat the same thing once again in another form: Belief in the sense intended by the Creed is not an incomplete kind of knowledge, an opinion that subsequently can or should be converted into practical knowledge. It is much rather an essentially different kind of intellectual attitude, which stands alongside practical knowledge as something independent and particular and cannot be traced back to it or deduced from it.”
Where does this spiritual journey, conversations, reason, practicality, awareness and even doubt about the faith lead to?
“..freedom is the characteristic mark of the Christian belief in God as opposed to any kind of monism. At the beginning of all being it puts not just some kind of consciousness but a creative freedom that creates further freedoms.”
This is indeed true. Christianity frees your mind, spirit, soul and your body. It leads to other freedoms we take for granted. Without Catholicism and its Orthodox brother Byzantium, there is no modern world. There would be no freedom, no rationality, no inventions of note, no advancements across the centuries, no hospitals, no metaphysical contemplations and philosophies. There would be nothing. See Islam for more details. These facts are lost on Pope Francis.
Excellent summation of why ISIS is Islam and Islam is ISIS. 1600 verses of hate speech exist in the Koran. Beheading, murdering, killing, war, Jihad, plunder, rape and sex slaving are all sanctioned by the Al Lah [Lord not God] thing for Muhammadans. The founder of Islam's life was a testimony to narcissistic military rule and egotistical obsessions with death, control, rapine and theft. ISIS is simply going back to the 'good old days' of Muhammad. In fact ISIS' 'caliph' is named Abu Bakr. The original Abu Bakr was Muhammad's best friend and the first caliph of Islam. He wiped out in the 'Apostate wars' all opposition to Islam in Arabia. He also finished off the Jews and Christians.
10. Muslims must hate non-believers
“Anyone with eyes and ears realizes that ISIS, like the Taliban and Al-Qaeda before it, is 100 percent Islamic. And most Westerners, as indicated by detailed polling in Europe, do have eyes and ears. Over time, they are increasingly relying on common sense to conclude that ISIS is indeed profoundly Islamic. (September 10, 2014)”
Why ISIS is Islam and Islam is ISIS:
Bukhari's Hadith simply reiterate the main themes of the Koran:
Jihad – 'fighting unbelievers in the name of the Allah' thing – is mandatory.
Jews and Christians named 'Dhimmis' [or those owned by Moslems]; must be slaves and must be controlled [if not killed] by the superior Moslem caste.
Paying a tax to the state is obligatory, in order to fund the Moslem community. Dhimmis and those who cannot fight in the Jihad are obliged by law to pay such a tax.
Muhammad was a political-military adventurer. Period. Conquering Mecca, demolishing its idols in the Kabaa, killing people and occupying the city as a conqueror in 630 AD at the head of 10.000 men [what Prophet does not kill and war ?], was not however, Muhammad's fault. Allah made him do it.
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 2, Book 23, Number 432: Narrated Ibn Abbas: The Prophet said, "Allah has made Mecca a sanctuary (sacred place) and it was a sanctuary before me and will be so after me. It was made legal for me (to fight in it) for a few hours of the day.
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 3, Book 29, Number 58: Narrated Said bin Abu Said Al-Maqburi: Abu Shuraih, Al-'Adawi said that he had said to 'Amr bin Sa'id when he was sending the troops to Mecca (to fight 'Abdullah bin Az-Zubair), "O Chief! Allow me to tell you what Allah's Apostle said on the day following the Conquest of Mecca. [same statement as 2:23:432, namely, Allah made him do it].
Jews, Christians and other Dhimmis are cash-cows paying the bulk of taxes. Don't overburden them. However, and most importantly, they must follow their second-class status as Moslem-owned slaves and obey the Moslem-given regulations as to their actions and status, in their entirety.
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 2, Book 23, Number 475: Narrated 'Amr bin Maimun Al-Audi: ..abide by the rules and regulations concerning the Dhimmis (protectees) of Allah and His Apostle, to fulfill their contracts completely and fight for them and not to tax (overburden) them beyond their capabilities."
If the Dhimmis don't pay the taxes or convert the Moslem enterprise will go bankrupt.
When Muhammad died, the Jihad went on, and the conversion of Arab pagans to Muhammad's moon cult went into frenzied action.
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 2, Book 23, Number 483: Narrated Abu Huraira: When Allah's Apostle died and Abu Bakr became the caliph some Arabs renegade (reverted to disbelief) (Abu Bakr decided to declare war against them), 'Umar, said to Abu Bakr, "How can you fight with these people although Allah's Apostle said, 'I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight the people till they say: "None has the right to be worshipped but Allah, and whoever said it then he will save his life and property from me except on trespassing the law (rights and conditions for which he will be punished justly), and his accounts will be with Allah.' "
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 2, Book 24, Number 536: Narrated Abu Huraira: Abu Bakr said, "By Allah! If they (pay me the Zakat and) with-hold even a she-kid which they used to pay during the life-time of Allah's Apostle, I will fight with them for it." 'Umar said, "It was nothing but Allah Who opened Abu Bakr's chest towards the decision to fight, and I came to know that his decision was right."
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 2, Book 22, Number 302: Narrated Al-Azraq bin Qais: We were at Al-Ahwaz fighting the AlHaruriya (tribe).
Jihad is mandatory, unless you are on the Hajj or pilgrimmage to Muhammad's cult center at Mecca:
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 2, Book 15, Number 86: Narrated Ibn Abbas: The Prophet said, "No good deeds done on other days are superior to those done on these (first ten days of Dhul Hijja)." Then some companions of the Prophet said, "Not even Jihad?" He replied, "Not even Jihad, except that of a man who does it by putting himself and his property in danger (for Allah's sake) and does not return with any of those things."
Jihad is mandatory unless you have paid a lot of tax to the despotic ruler and his gang for the benefit of the Moslem cult in general.
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 2, Book 26, Number 594: Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet was asked, "Which is the best deed?" He said, "To believe in Allah and His Apostle." He was then asked, "Which is the next (in goodness)?" He said, "To participate in Jihad in Allah's Cause." He was then asked, "Which is the next?" He said, "To perform Hajj-Mabrur. "
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 2, Book 26, Number 595: Narrated 'Aisha: (the mother of the faithful believers) I said, "O Allah's Apostle! We consider Jihad as the best deed." The Prophet said, "The best Jihad (for women) is Hajj Mabrur. "
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 2, Book 24, Number 547: Narrated Abu Huraira Allah's Apostle (p.b.u.h) ordered (a person) to collect Zakat, and that person returned and told him that Ibn Jamil, Khalid bin Al-Walid, and Abbas bin 'Abdul Muttalib had refused to give Zakat." The Prophet said, "What made Ibn Jamll refuse to give Zakat though he was a poor man, and was made wealthy by Allah and His Apostle ? But you are unfair in asking Zakat from Khalid as he is keeping his armor for Allah's Cause (for Jihad). As for Abbas bin 'Abdul Muttalib, he is the uncle of Allah's Apostle (p.b.u.h) and Zakat is compulsory on him and he should pay it double."
Hadith (Bukhari): Volume 2, Book 23, Number 475:
Abu Bakr said, "By Allah! I will fight those who differentiate between the prayer and the Zakat as Zakat is the compulsory right to be taken from the property (according to Allah's orders) By Allah! If they refuse to pay me even a she-kid which they used to pay at the time of Allah's Apostle . I would fight with them for withholding it" Then 'Umar said, "By Allah, it was nothing, but Allah opened Abu Bakr's chest towards the decision (to fight) and I came to know that his decision was right."
Other than fighting, Jihad, forcing Jews and Christians into contracts as second-class slaves, and forcing the payment of Zakat or a tax to fund the Moslem state through coercion; Islam and the Koran is peace, love, harmony and good manners. So the 'experts' tell us.
Probably the best 8 minute video on the Koran I have ever seen. Presented by Koran expert David Wood, a man who sends the appeasers, Moslem-lovers, moon cult members and various Church figures into apoplexy. He lays out why the Moslems of ISIS, usually portrayed as 'angry youth', are simply following the Koran and implementing Sharia law.
Wood also explains why the later 'Allah' [aka Muhammad] 'revelations' about slaying, slaughtering, killing, murdering the Jews, Christians and less-than-pious Moslems; supersede the 2 or 3 apocryphal phrases of 'niceness' that the media and quackademics chatter so much about. The famous 2:256 verse of 'no compulsion in religion' is a fiction if you read the entirety of Sura 2 and what follows 2:256. There certainly is a lot of compulsion in Islam. 1400 years of Jihad prove that.
Key Koranic Sura and verses identified by Wood and recommended reading for anyone who cares a whit about civilization are below. Please read them and understand them and use them in argumentation and 'dialogue' with the nitwits of the multi-cult.
2:106 [this is the abrogation verse, which means that killing for Allah as given in the most important chapters of 9, 5, 4, and 2 supersede previous verses].
In Bukhari's Hadith, there are 'only' 300 or so verses commanding Jihad. This proves that Islam has nothing to do with violence, war, plunder, rape and murder. The Hadiths are the corollary works to the Koran; and include all aspects of the life of the totalitarian Muhammad, as he established his fascist 'us versus them', cult. Jihad means to wage war to spread Islam. This is the primary purpose of Muhammad's cult. A secondary meaning and inferior to the first, is that Jihad means striving to overcome the natural tendency to do wrong or evil; or to 'cleanse' your own self.
It is clear however that the Koran and Hadiths demand first and foremost the physical Jihad, or the fighting against Unbelievers. This is only common-sense. In Muhammad's world-view the spiritual struggle comes after victory against the untermensch Unbelievers. Indeed the Koran and Hadiths make it clear that Islam must conquer the world. This is an obvious declaration of war.
Bukhari Hadith: “Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet said, "A single endeavor (of fighting) in Allah's Cause in the forenoon or in the afternoon is better than the world and whatever is in it."
Narrated Ibn 'Abbas: On the day of the Conquest (of Mecca) the Prophet said, "There is no emigration after the Conquest but Jihad and intentions. When you are called (by the Muslim ruler) for fighting, go forth immediately." (See Hadith No. 42)
Narrated 'Abdullah bin Abi Aufa: Allah's Apostle said, "Know that Paradise is under the shades of swords."
Narrated Jundab bin Sufyan: In one of the holy Battles a finger of Allah's Apostle (got wounded and) bled. He said, "You are just a finger that bled, and what you got is in Allah's Cause."
Narrated Al-Bara: A man whose face was covered with an iron mask (i.e. clad in armor) came to the Prophet and said, "O Allah's Apostle! Shall I fight or embrace Islam first? "The Prophet said, "Embrace Islam first and then fight." So he embraced Islam, and was martyred. Allah's Apostle said, A Little work, but a great reward. "(He did very little (after embracing Islam), but he will be rewarded in abundance)."
Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "Allah welcomes two men with a smile; one of whom kills the other and both of them enter Paradise. One fights in Allah's Cause and gets killed. Later on Allah forgives the 'killer who also get martyred (In Allah's Cause)."
These are just some examples where Muhammad, who was much admired by Hitler, ordered his men to fight and kill. Even if you were a brigand and murderer, once you join the Allah-cult, or cult of Muhammad, you will be forgiven all past transgressions, as long as you fight for Allah. The key is that you must physically fight and kill or attempt to kill Unbelievers in the name of Allah. Jihad is an integral to Islam as racism and evolution were to Nazism.
Jihad is an Arabic word which sends the multi-cult into twitters of earnest contemplation. It is etymologically derived from the word mujahada, which means in Arabic to wage war to establish dominance. Mujahedin, or soldiers of the mujahada, are 'warriors of Jihad'. Jihad as 'war' is declaimed by Moslems, including their mad founder, to be the 'lesser' Jihad. The 'greater' Jihad is considered as a form of spiritual warfare against the lower self, (nafs). Muhammad supposedly said as he was returning from Jihad, “We have returned from the lesser jihad to the greater jihad”. When limp-wrists state that Jihad means a spiritual struggle, they are only partially correct and ignorant of the totality of its meaning. Jihad is 2 parts – internal and external. The entire Koran and Hadiths are calls to Jihad, most of these are of course obligations to wage war against non-Moslems.
There are about 1600 verses of violence in the Koran – Jihad in one way or another. Demanding Jihad as a 'duty' from Moslem cult members can be found in Koranic verses such as:
Fighting is prescribed for you (2:216)
2) Slay them wherever you find them (4:89)
3) Fight the idolaters utterly (9:36)
In general Jihadic war is the '6th pillar' of Islam and is an obligation incumbent upon all Moslems. Bukhari's Hadiths, or commentary on Muhammad's life, make Jihad even more pronounced as a duty. In fact Jihadic war is deemed to be in the top 2 or 3 duties of a Moslem [see for eg. Book 1 of Bukhari, here and here]. Bukhari writes:
“I have been commanded to fight people until they testify that there is no god but Allah and that Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah, and perform the prayer, and pay zakat. If they say it, they have saved their blood and possessions from me, except for the rights of Islam over them. And their final reckoning is with Allah''; and the Hadith reported by Muslim which finds many echoes in Bukhari,
“To go forth in the morning or evening to fight in the path of Allah is better than the whole world and everything in it.''
Muhammad's entire 'career' was one of Jihad, plunder, murder, killing, war, sex-slaving and enriching himself. He was murdered by his own men [not a Jewess doctor], tired of 'revelations' from a fat man covered in gold and silver, ensconced with a harem. He fought in some 29 battles, and ordered nearly 60 more expeditions of pillage and Jihad. Calling the leader of this Moslem Jihadic cult a 'prophet' is about as intelligent as calling Herr Hitler a spiritual counsellor. Stating that Jihad is some form of spiritual struggle whilst ignoring its real meaning as an obligation to wage war, is simply insufferable ignorance.
A list of violent Hadiths from Bukhari, volume 1 the 2nd half [first half is here]. These are the purported sayings and deeds of the totalitarian Muhammad, leader of the Meccan moon-deity cult named Submission [to himself of course]. These dreary, boring observations were written 2 centuries after his death. They reflect in part, the Jihadic, intolerant, blood-thirsty, Manichean world-view of Mein Koran.
"While Allah's Apostle was praying beside the Ka'ba, there were some Quraish people sitting in a gathering. ...Who amongst you can go and bring the dung, blood and the abdominal contents (intestines, etc). of the slaughtered camels of the family of so and so and then wait till he prostrates and put that in between his shoulders?' The most unfortunate amongst them ('Uqba bin Abi Mu'ait) went (and brought them) and when Allah's Apostle prostrated, he put them between his shoulders. ...When Allah's Apostle completed his prayer, he said, 'O Allah! Take revenge on Quraish.' .."By Allah! I saw all of them dead in the battle field on the day of Badr and they were dragged and thrown in the Qalib (a well) at Badr: Allah's Apostle then said, 'Allah's curse has descended upon the people of the Qalib (well).”
Note: Don't you dare make fun of the 'prophet' !
“I asked the Prophet "Which deed is the dearest to Allah?" He replied, "To offer the prayers at their early stated fixed times." I asked, "What is the next (in goodness)?" He replied, "To be good and dutiful to your parents" I again asked, "What is the next (in goodness)?" He replied, 'To participate in Jihad (religious fighting) in Allah's cause." 'Abdullah added, "I asked only that much and if I had asked more, the Prophet would have told me more."
“On the day of Al-Khandaq (the battle of trench.) 'Umar bin Al-Khattab came cursing the disbelievers of Quraish after the sun had set and said, "O Allah's Apostle I could not offer the 'Asr prayer till the sun had set." The Prophet said, "By Allah! I, too, have not prayed." So we turned towards Buthan, and the Prophet performed ablution and we too performed ablution and offered the 'Asr prayer after the sun had set, and then he offered the Maghrib prayer.”
Note: The Quraish were a Jewish tribe and were wiped out by Muhammad's Jihad. See here for more information.
Same as 570.
“...Then Allah will come to them again and say, 'I am your Lord.' They will say, 'You are our Lord.' Allah will call them, and As-Sirat (a bridge) will be laid across Hell and I (Muhammad) shall be the first amongst the Apostles to cross it with my followers. Nobody except the Apostles will then be able to speak and they will be saying then, 'O Allah! Save us. O Allah Save us.'”
So the pious Moslem reading this would learn:
Killing Jews is fine – as long as you say your prayers.
Jihad against 'unbelievers' is at least #3 in importance as a duty of Moslems.
Muhammad is the gatekeeper to paradise and he is the only one who can 'save' you.
If you make fun of Muhammad you will likely be killed.
Hell is reserved for non-Moslems, or those not pious enough in their devotion to the moon deity ilah [the Lord of Mecca Hu'Baal, whose sanctuary was protected by Muhammad's family, hence his last name, Abdullah or slave of Allah].
Such dogma denotes a cult, not a religion.
A list of violent Hadith from Bukhari, volume 1 the first half, courtesy of the Meccan moon cult named Submission. Submit to Muhammed who is always conflated with the Meccan moon god Hu'Baal or the 'Lord' [ilah]. If you don't submit to Mein Koran and the 1600 injunctions it contains advocating violence against Jews, Christians and less-than-pious Moslems; than Muhammad-Allah will destroy you. Bukhari's Hadiths, so beloved by Moslemophiles and assorted nitwits who pretend that a Bedouin cult is a religion, simply follow the Koran. Minutiae from Muhammad's toilet routine, to his passing wind during prayer, the fondling of his wives during menstruation, and other vital information, is punctuated by the usual dreary Moslem chants of Jihad and death.
Bukhari, a Jihadic intolerant recounts the wonderful ways of Jihad, as given by the deeds of Muhammad:
Allah's Apostle said: "I have been ordered (by Allah) to fight against the people until they testify that none has the right to be worshipped but Allah and that Muhammad is Allah's Apostle, and offer the prayers perfectly and give the obligatory charity, so if they perform a that, then they save their lives an property from me except for Islamic laws and then their reckoning (accounts) will be done by Allah."
Allah's Apostle was asked, "What is the best deed?" He replied, "To believe in Allah and His Apostle (Muhammad). The questioner then asked, "What is the next (in goodness)? He replied, "To participate in Jihad (religious fighting) in Allah's Cause."
The Prophet said, "The person who participates in (Holy battles) in Allah's cause and nothing compels him to do so except belief in Allah and His Apostles, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty (if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise (if he is killed in the battle as a martyr). Had I not found it difficult for my followers, then I would not remain behind any sariya going for Jihad and I would have loved to be martyred in Allah's cause and then made alive, and then martyred and then made alive, and then again martyred in His cause."
[Justifying the slaughter of the 'pagan' Meccans in 630 AD]...So anybody who has belief in Allah and the Last Day (i.e. a Muslim) should neither shed blood in it nor cut down its trees. If anybody argues that fighting is allowed in Mecca as Allah's Apostle did fight (in Mecca), tell him that Allah gave permission to His Apostle, but He did not give it to you....
...the law that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for the killing of (a disbeliever).
Same as 104.
A man came to the Prophet and asked, "O Allah's Apostle! What kind of fighting is in Allah's cause? (I ask this), for some of us fight because of being enraged and angry and some for the sake of his pride and haughtiness." The Prophet raised his head (as the questioner was standing) and said, "He who fights so that Allah's Word (Islam) should be superior, then he fights in Allah's cause."
....One of them said to the others, "Who amongst you will bring the abdominal contents (intestines, etc.) of a camel of Bani so and so and put it on the back of Muhammad, when he prostrates?" ...Allah's Apostle was in prostration and he did not lift his head up till Fatima (Prophet's daughter) came and threw that (camel's abdominal contents) away from his back. He raised his head and said thrice, "O Allah! Punish Quraish." ...By Allah in Whose Hands my life is, I saw the dead bodies of those persons who were counted by Allah's Apostle in the Qalib (one of the wells) of Badr.
The Prophet said, "I have been given five things which were not given to any one else before me.
1. Allah made me victorious by awe, (by His frightening my enemies) for a distance of one month's journey.
2. The earth has been made for me (and for my followers) a place for praying and a thing to perform Tayammum, therefore anyone of my followers can pray wherever the time of a prayer is due.
3. The booty has been made Halal (lawful) for me yet it was not lawful for anyone else before me.
4. I have been given the right of intercession (on the Day of Resurrection).
5. Every Prophet used to be sent to his nation only but I have been sent to all mankind.
We conquered Khaibar, took the captives, and the booty was collected. Dihya came and said, 'O Allah's Prophet! Give me a slave girl from the captives.' The Prophet said, 'Go and take any slave girl.' He took Safiya ..she is the chief mistress of the tribes of Quraiza and An-Nadir and she befits none but you.'
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' ..."Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."
Same as 331.
So in the first half of Bukhari's Hadiths here is what I learnt:
Jihad is mandatory for all Moslems
Jihad means killing any who oppose the Muhammadan cult.
Jihad will be rewarded in this life and the next.
A Moslem who kills the unbelievers cannot be punished.
Sex slavery is fine, since Muhammad took the Jewess Safiya, the wife of the Jewish Khaibar tribe whom he had just eradicated; as a concubine.
Moslems are superior and destined to rule the world.
These are simply facts elicited from the text. It follows therefore that Islam is violent, supremacist, and raving mad.
The Hadith are the collected stories, sayings and imparted warnings of Mohammed, the founder of the collectivist, totalitarian Meccan cult devoted to the Allah [contraction ilah], the 'Lord' of Mecca, who was of course the moon deity or Hu'Baal. Mohammed's full name was Abdullah, or slave of Allah. The pagan and quite celestial antecedents of Hu'Baal or the Meccan ilah are obvious to any who have taken the time to study Arab history. Mohammed was no more than a deranged brigand, a thug with an army, who raped, killed, plundered, sex-slaved and murdered, whilst becoming incredibly wealthy. Academics and sundry experts declaim the life of this warlord illustrates a prophet-hood, holding high the mantle of religiosity, waving a standard of peace.
The Hadiths of Bukhari are the 3rd most important liturgical source of inspiration for Moslems, after Mein Koran, and Mein Sira [a purported biography of Mohammed]. They are holy. Following the Koran they are also quite bloody and intolerant. The Hadiths were written in about 900 AD or some 270 years after Mohammed's death. They were culled from the oral traditions, scraps of writings and the general Moslem memory. The Hadiths show a cult that is deformed, violent and Jihadic.
Bukhari's work is of dubious authenticity. It is massive, ponderous, incoherent, poorly written and organized. It thus mimics the Koran. The messaging is clear however. Mohammed is the supreme representation of divine favour. Everything he said and did was therefore of inestimable importance. If you don't follow this divine 'messenger' you transgress against the divine law and are thus open for punishment.
The main theme of Bukhari's Hadiths is 4:52:196:
Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah 's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' and whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah,' his life and property will be saved by me except for Islamic law, and his accounts will be with Allah, (either to punish him or to forgive him.)" (Bukhari Hadith, Volume 4, Book 52, Number 196) Source
Saved through Mohammed ? This is a plagiarism from the Bible. The New Testament discusses the human being 'saved' through his belief in Christ whose mission was the exact opposites of Mohammed's. Islam is thereby the anti-Christ doctrine. Christ tells his apostles:
Mark 16:15-18, "And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. And these signs shall follow them that believe; In my name shall they cast out devils; they shall speak with new tongues; They shall take up serpents; and if they drink any deadly thing, it shall not hurt them; they shall lay hands on the sick, and they shall recover."
In Bukhari's Hadith passage above it is only Mohammed who can save humans and provide salvation. One intention of Mohammedansim is to replace Christ with the founder of the monotheistic ilah cult. But why would anyone believe that a man who murdered, sex-slaved, owned a harem, waged war, cut off the heads of Jews and Christians and tortured his enemies can now magically 'save them' ? From what exactly ? People like Mohammed ?
For geniuses, ISIS or ISIL is not Islam. The cult of Mecca is always portrayed as singularly civilized, advanced, tolerant and progressive. This is why the Moslem world today is a cesspool mess of blood, death, illiteracy, polygamy, slavery, misogyny and poverty. Obviously Islam is so vaunted, it leads to the modern Moslem state – impoverished, riven by violence, incest and destruction.
“Barack Obama has made it clear: “ISIL speaks for no religion. Their victims are overwhelmingly Muslim, and no faith teaches people to massacre innocents.” David Cameron intoned: “What we are witnessing is actually a battle between Islam on the one hand and extremists who want to abuse Islam on the other. These extremists, often funded by fanatics living far away from the battlefields, pervert the Islamic faith as a way of justifying their warped and barbaric ideology – and they do so not just in Iraq and Syria but right across the world, from Boko Haram and al-Shabaab to the Taliban and al-Qaeda.” Source
Obama a Moslem sympathizer, and the entire Western elite including the arch-Moslemophile Cameron, are insipid, blind, dangerous, deluded and ignorant. They are plutocratic morons fully invested in their Marxist-Multiculturalist contra-reality theology. Obama entombed inside the Moslem Brotherhood's influence; has said nothing about the 3.000 or so Christians brutally executed by ISIS including women and children. He only wails pity about the dead Moslems ISIS has dispatched on behalf of the moon deity HuBaal the Lord of Mecca or ilah. Cameron and his fellow multicult travellers are accessories to murder pure and simple. They are doing nothing to stop the slaughter of Christians in Iraq and Syria. Even worse, being good simpletons they will import more of these desert Allah fascists into their states, until the Western world is just a larger version of Brussels or Kosovo.
ISIS is Islam. Islam is ISIS. ISIS is simply implementing Sharia – Koranic 'law', or Moslem bronze-age barbaric theocratic rule. A fact loss on academics, the media and witless politicians such as Cameron and Obama.
The Russian invasion of the Ukraine is rather obvious. This incursion into foreign territory was easily predicted back 6 or 7 years ago, by simply listening to the neo-Soviet Politburo chatter in the Kremlin. The intention is to annex not just the Crimea – a tasty starter – but the industrialized, mineral-rich Eastern Ukraine. Russian troops in their thousands now operate in the Ukraine, yet Western Russophiles deny the invasion, deny the bloodshed initiated by the Neo-Soviet cabal in Moscow, and even defend Russian eradication of Ukrainian sovereignty in the Crimea and the Eastern Ukraine. If China invades Siberia or the neo-Soviet borderlands rich with resources; I would expect the same cacophony of stupidity to rain down in support of the Chinese invasion.
According to Russophile geniuses, the Ukrainian government is 'fascist' [Hitler's cult of evolution and race supremacy I suppose they mean]; is engaged in killing Ukrainians by the score; whilst Russia is simply trying to 'feed' and 'cloth' the 'poor people' caught in the Ukrainian government's Hobbesian war of the state Leviathan against the peasants. Marxist revolutionary chants and sloganeering included. Apparently the 'Ukrainian separatists' are freedom loving pro-Moscow, pro-human rights saints, desirous of trade, culture, peace and love.
One would expect that such a distorted mental illness in viewing an obvious invasion, informs the Russophile's view of Islam – obviously 'most' Moslems [like the Russians] are peaceniks, intent on inter-faith harmony and understanding. If there is violence in the name of the cult of Submission, than blame the victim. If the Russians invade a neighbouring country, blame the raped and plundered.
If Putin were to cut off Porosenko's head with his own macho-army issued machete, the Russophiles [aka Soviet supporters]; would blame the Ukrainian untermensch, just as Moslemophiles ignore the severed heads, the recent 3.000 dead Christians in Syria and Iraq, and the mutilated bodies of raped women, and bloody babies, shrugging their relativist shoulders and moaning 'what about the Crusades?' Geniuses.
According to the 'Enlightenment thinkers', starting with the redoubtably ignorant Petrarch, all was 'Dark' and opaque before 1550. Then suddenly, magically, the world of 'science', 'evolved' and man was freed. Thanks to Islam, Voltaire and Darwin, mankind's rationality was enabled, casting off 2000 years of oppression, fear, superstition and dirty stupidity. Which is why of course during said period, there were such monumental achievements as hospitals, eye glasses, chimneys, the blast furnace, science, math, public schools, art, polyphonic music, orchestras....
Brunelleschi's early 15th century dome in Florence is yet another example of unparalleled genius in the Middle Ages. Of course the 'Renaissance' claims this to be their own, as if this period of development was divorced from, and antagonistic to, what came before it. For the phase theologians of the not-so-Enlightened period; the time frames of the Middle Ages are very fluid indeed. Giotto's 3-D artwork from the early 14th century, along with Dante and sundry technologies such as wind-mills, are routinely categorized as part of the 'Renaissance'. Such fraudulent posturing is called 'factual'.
Brunelleschi’s Florentine dome, started in 1419, is situated firmly within the Medieval period, an era of great progress and wealth creation; and is the largest masonry dome ever built and is an astonishing 45 meters wide. It was created in part to supersede Justinian's enormous 6th century dome in the Haggia Sophia in Constantinople. The complexity of the project was staggering and it took more than 100 years from the original idea in 1296, to 1419, to start the affair. In fact even today, we don't fully understand how Brunelleschi achieved his masterpiece.
“Perhaps the most haunting mystery is the simplest of all: How did Brunelleschi and his masons position each brick, stone beam, and other structural element with such precision inside the vastly complex cathedral—a task that modern architects with their laser levels, GPS positioning devices, and CAD software would still find challenging today?”
Brunelleschi's dome was built squarely in the Middle Ages. But don't expert to hear 'experts' and quackademics admit that fact. They will simply move the 1419 project to the 'Renaissance'. Anything to avoid the obvious and anything to inure the cult of the Enlightenment from criticism.
History of the Dome is here
When you hear ignoramuses discuss a 'Dark Age', ask them if they meant Byzantium, a city and empire which is the longest lived in history – 1131 years – and which was very Christian. From its inception in 324 AD until 1453 AD, Byzantium might have been the richest city in world history, with its collection of gold, silver, art, literature and precious artifacts without precedent. Maybe the brain-washed liberal arts major can explain how a Christian empire could have been so long-lived and produced the following in a 'Dark Age':
-Largest city on the planet for 1000 years – Constantinople, Moslem propaganda notwithstanding. [Constantinople contained about 1 million, a claim Moslems made for Cordoba pop. 50.000, and Baghdad, pop. 200.000].
-The most innovative and exquisite Cathedral until the Gothic period; the Haggia Sophia, which was the largest masonry project in world history outside of Herod's 2nd Temple; and contains the largest dome ever built until Florence in the 15th century (but remember it was a dark age in Florence as well in 1400...)
-World's first university dating from the early 5th century was established at Constantinople.
-World's first public school system dates from about 400 AD in Byzantium.
-Constantinople was the largest marble-building site in world history. The city is literally built from the same marble stone, and all of the city's buildings were erected from an island quarry named Marmara. No other city was built from marble on such a scale.
-Byzantium erected the largest aqueducts ever built, carrying water from 150 miles away, some aqueduct bridges are 90 feet high. These dwarf anything the Western Romans built.
-Underground sewers along with enormous water storage facilities were created – for the first time in history in Constantinople. Cisterns below the city held enough water for many years of usage – all fed by natural springs 150 miles away.
-Byzantine art and architecture influenced the civilized world and greatly influenced the art and architecture of Western Europe, Russia, the Near East, and even Iran and China.
-A codex of laws, diplomatic rules and regulations, and policies governing inter-state relations were developed in Byzantium and used by other empires and states.
-Astrolabe, architectural innovations, astronomy, Greek and Roman learning and sundry other inventions were carried from Byzantium to every part of its extensive trade route.
-Ptolemy’s Almagest which laid out a Greek and Christian view of a spherical earth at the centre of the universe, and which calculated the earth's circumference along with literally thousands of important astronomical observations found its way into Western society through Byzantium.
-Greek-fire was a unique and highly effective Byzantine invention. Many other military inventions including the Trebuchet [a gravity inspired heavy object/missile launcher dating from the 6th century]; influenced Western military technology.
The Byzantine empire had mortal weaknesses which led to its final demise. Most of these centered around the ills of despotism, centralized governance, over-taxation, bureaucratic corruption; and a belief, common to all major empires; that they were the centre of the world and that their world would never end.
Despite these weaknesses there is little doubt that this rich, successful, advanced and culturally supreme Christian empire, was the most important centre of learning, the arts, culture and trade for 1000 years. There is a very good argument to make, that without Byzantium's influence and indeed its wealth post the 1204 Crusader sacking of Constantinople, that Western Europe may not have developed modern civilization. The critical aspect of Byzantium was the fact it was Christian, and this world-view of Christianity allowed the Eastern Greek Romans to create a cultural colossus that impacted history and furthered the development of mankind. So much for the 'Dark Ages'.
Mainstream/Lamebain media view of Islam. ISIS, Hamas, Hizbollah, Al Qaeda et al are 'fringe extremists' corrupting a 'religion'. If you study what these groups say, they are simply implementing Koranic law, that is to say, they are holding true and fast to what the founder of the moon cult named Submission demanded. Muhammad's screed of supremacism, racism, violence and madness is no different than other communal creeds of Jihad and endless war, such as Nazism, or Communism. Witness the vapidity of a leading 'conservative' newspaper, the WSJ, and its op-ed on ISIS:
“But now, after months of graphic violence and crude propaganda, and after Foley's beheading, the nature, threat and intentions of ISIS have become clear. This week the president sent bombers. There were no demonstrations in protest. Even the pope didn't protest. To stop violent aggressors, Francis noted when asked about the U.S. bombings, is "licit." He did not explicitly support bombing, but noted the stopping of groups such as ISIS was justifiable.
Historian Louise Adena wrote the following about Byzantium and its impact on the West:
“The Byzantine or Eastern Roman Empire with Constantinople at its heart was established at the beginning of the fourth century AD by the Roman Emperor Constantine (272-337AD). While it remained a major world cultural and commercial centre for over 1000 years, it has been only during the twentieth century that European historians have come to acknowledge its profound influence on Western Europe. Its enduring legacies are seen in European art and legal systems. It was also key to the widespread adoption of Christianity in Europe; it was the base for the spread of learning in Europe providing continuity between ancient Greek and Roman civilisations and into the European Renaissance.” [Bold emphasis is mine]
The Eastern Roman empire, suffused in Greek and Near Eastern language and culture, is certainly one of history's forgotten empires. Along with Western Church canon law, some remnants of Roman Law, Byzantium certainly helped shaped Western legal jurisprudence and its impact is still in evidence today. Under Emperor Justinian (482-565AD) the Eastern Roman empire compiled laws and legislation into one legal code - the ‘Codex Justinianus’. This codex compiled into one extant form, all of the state's laws which the citizens would be obliged to follow.
This idea whilst not entirely revolutionary, was profound. It introduced the legal concept of innocent-until-proven-guilty, which relied on proof, witnesses, a due process and common-sense. Justinian's codex is therefore one of the main planks of our modern legal system, equalizing all citizens before an impartial set of laws, and ostracizing the baleful influence of wealth and power over proper legal proceedings and decisions.
In the development of civilization, an often overlooked contributor was the Roman-Greek empire of Byzantium. The influences of Byzantium affected Western art, architecture, military technology, philosophy and even medicine. Justinian the Serbian peasant and Byzantine Tsar in 535 AD onwards, initiated a series of wars to reclaim Western Roman territory which devastated Italy and North Africa, weakening both areas for generations. In the Byzantine mind, the Western Roman empire, which had splintered into 3 Germanic kingdoms and various petty Lordships; belonged to the Eastern Roman empire.
The Moslems plundered Byzantium both literally and figuratively, and it is from the Eastern Roman empire that all of the Islamic architecture is derived. Indeed Byzantine Christian slaves and dhimmis were vital in the management of various Caliphates, the teaching of Greek and Roman literature and learning to Moslems; the translation of essential ideas and works ranging from astronomy to medicaments; and of course the architecting of sundry Mosques. The Grand Mosque in Cordoba uses the columns, arches and layout of various temples, public buildings and bath houses found in Constantinople.
Eastern Rome before the time of the Moslem invasions had become rich. But it also had become mystical, bureaucratic, ossified, and out of date. It was rigid. The fact that remnants of the Eastern Roman empire survived until 1453 and the Moslem eradication of Constantinople [40.000 killed, 30.000 enslaved]; is a remarkable testimony, however, to its former power, importance and organization. What Eastern Rome needed was the Western 'renaissance' which occurred after the Western Roman empire thankfully went out of business. Both empires outlived their usefulness and their utility, especially regarding the lives of ordinary people, and the further development of civilization including its spiritual component.
An excellent one volume study of Byzantium is by Julius Norwich. Though in need of repair the Moslem destruction of this civilization was a tragedy.
“Byzantine's collapse was for many reasons, an inevitability. Nevertheless its destruction is one of the greatest tragedies in history. The Turkish takeover of Constantinople and the destruction of a noble, intelligent and complicated culture did nothing to advance civilisation. In the place of Greek and Roman learning, there was erected a primitive, expansive and aggressive Islamic cult and empire – shut off from inquiry, science and spiritual tolerance and dedicated to imperialism. We see the results today in the failed Islamic states which gird the globe from North Africa to Pakistan. This might have been Europe's fate as well - if not for Byzantium.”
The Middle Ages was an era of enormous artistic output. Archaeology has only revealed a small tithe of what existed. Plunder, destruction, theft and lost treasure unfortunately impoverish our modern understanding of the artistic impulse of this period. Likely no more than 2% of what was produced from 500-1000 AD has been recovered. But even this fractional amount reveals an astonishing society of wealth, culture and creativity.
A good history of Anglo-Saxon and early Anglo-Saxon English art can be found here.
Witness the genius of this Anglo-Saxon shoulder clasp: possibly the highest standard of European jewellery art ever found. Not until modern kilns were developed could reproductions of what lies buried at Sutton be made, such was the intricacy of this and other artifacts. Only a sophisticated, wealthy, active and industrializing society, could produce Anglo-Saxon art.
The oldest surviving example of a stained glass window, which reaches back into the time of the 7th century rests in Jarrow England. The English historian Bede would have seen this particular display of genius. Stained glass manufacture is incredibly complicated. No other society in the world developed this art form.
“Glass is made by fusing together some form of silica such as sand, an alkali such as potash or soda, and lime or lead oxide. The color is produced by adding a metallic oxide to the raw materials. Copper oxide, under different conditions, produces ruby, blue, or green colors in glass. Cobalt is usually used to produce most shades of blues. Green shades can also be obtained from the addition of chromium and iron oxide. Golden glass is sometimes colored with uranium, cadmium sulfide, or titanium, and there are fine selenium yellows as well as vermilions. Ruby colored glass is made by adding gold.”
But remember all was dark. No light shone. Only Islam, Galileo and Voltaire would stand athwart the path to the abyss.....which is why Moslems never produced art to match Sutton Hoo or a stained glass window and Voltaire et al could not replicate the processes of discovery to make something as intricate or redoubtable as a Sutton Hoo bracelet. This is why they were so enlightened.
Show me the Moslem equivalent.
The Lindisfarne gospels were created in the late 7th century by Catholic monks in their north-eastern England retreat. One monk in particular Eadfrith, is credited with the astonishing artwork, without precedent in Europe. Next to the Book of Kells [see here], the decorated Lindisfarne manuscript laid out on vellum, elaborately furnished with intricate artwork of staggering detail, is one of the world's greatest works of art. It stands along with the Book of Kells as an unrivalled testimony to religion and civilization. Dedicated to the 4 gospel writers, this middle-ages manifest is a dedication to beauty, truth, awareness and supreme culture. It combines the essence of European art with a distinctly Anglo-Saxon skill and view of the world.
An audio and book translation can be found here.
“The Lindisfarne Gospels, one of the most magnificent manuscripts of the early Middle Ages, was written and decorated at the end of the 7th century by the monk Eadfrith, who became Bishop of Lindisfarne in 698 and died in 721. Its original leather binding, long since lost, was made by Ethelwald, who succeeded Eadfrith as bishop, and was decorated with jewels and precious metals later in the 8th century by Billfrith the Anchorite. The Latin text of the Gospels is translated word by word in an Old English gloss, the earliest surviving example of the Gospel text in any form of the English language, it was added between the lines in the mid 10th century by Aldred, Provost of Chester-le-Street. Today the manuscript is once again bound in silver and jewels, in covers made in 1852 at the expense of Edward Maltby, Bishop of Durham. The design is based on motifs drawn from the decoration of the manuscript itself....”
But remember, before sundry fat and ignorant atheists such as Gibbon, Diderot, Voltaire or Hume, or the fraud of all trades Galileo, Europe stank in a 'dark age'. Superstition and stupidity reigned, art and society had collapsed. Nothing of value was manufactured. Only Islam kept the candle of civilization burning.....and all awaited the grand entrance of the 17th century and the age of science [along with witch-burning, abiogenesis, the occult, Puritanism, Spanish insolvency, the 30 years war to control Germany...].
So the propaganda tells us.
Partial list of Moslem assaults just against US assets, citizens or territory. By all means live in the fiction that the cult of Muhammad is peace and love. Let's juxtapose this list against the 'terror' incidents incited by Catholics – all zero of them. Source and bold highlights are mine.
David Wood and the top 10 Koranic verses of hate speech against (David Wood and the top 10 Koranic verses of hate speech against 'Unbelievers': Probably the best 8 minute video...
The importance of Christianity in the development of Western civilisation.
Jihad is an obligation to wage war against non-Moslems. This is why the Moslem cult is so violent. (Jihad is an obligation to wage war against non-Moslems.: Jihad is an Arabic word which sends the multi-cult into...
Bukhari (Bukhari's Hadiths: 2nd half of volume 1 - the incitement to violence and supremacism: A list of violent Hadiths... http://t.co/46K72iYUsh)
Bukhari (Bukhari's Hadiths: First half of volume 1 - the incitement to violence and supremacism: A list of violent Hadiths...
Conservative philosopher Roger Scruton delivers the keynote address at the IPA's 2014 Foundations of Western Civilisation Symposium.
Shocking video! An Islamic Muslim woman (a Palestinian from Hamas controlled territory in Gaza), whose child received and needed medical care in Israel, was ...
Critics argue that India does not have Muslims by the name of Sulaiman ibn Ahmad is a last resort to attack his credibility. Now Hebrew word ben or ibn in Ar...
There is nothing new about religious fascism or caliphates. There is nothing new about rape, infanticide, honor killings, genocide, misogyny, slavery -- or headless journalism either.
There is absolutely nothing in the video of Rev. Robby Gallaty's recent sermon that is threatening, hateful, cruel, or the result of ignorance.
The Allah thing - aka Muhammad - hates Christians Koranic supremacism.
Christianophobia – Islam
"Christians must choose "Islam or death," while their women and daughters may legitimately be regarded as wives of Muslims" The enemedia's criminal silence on the relentless and bloody march of Islamic surpremacists on the backs and the bodies...
Answering the cult from a Christian perspective: What to say to Muslims, Jehovah Witnesses, Mormans, The New Age and others.
Idiots Guide to Islam http://alrassoolilive.blogspot.com/
Christianophobia – Islam
Christianophobia – Islam
Raping and torturing young girls.....isn't that what all intolerant cults do ?
It's time to wake up. The real muslims are the terrorist who are following the teachings within the quran. We are not the one's who say they are killing in t...
Nearly two years after the “Arab Spring” began in Egypt, the nation’s Muslim Brotherhood president has arrogated to himself dictatorial powers, and is ramming through a new constitution that will effectively extinguish the last vestiges of Egyptian democracy and establish Egypt as a Sharia state. Just as I said back in January 2011, when the uprisings against Mubarak began, for the people in Egypt who had real power to affect change, the “Arab Spring” was never about democracy and pluralism, despite the ululations of the Western press; it was always about imposing Islamic law upon Egypt. And now, with the new constitution, here we are.
These are not the regular beatings and vandalism against Christians, Hindus and Buddhists but religion-oriented attacks in which someone dies at the hand of a member of the”religion of peace.”
Have you done your shopping yet? It’s Hatred and Violence in the Qur’an Awareness Month — what better time to buy a bomb vest for the mujahid you love?
Inspired by a remark from Pat Condell in this video, I have proclaimed December to be Hatred and Violence in the Qur’an Awareness Month. After all, November was Islamophobia Awareness Month, and certainly the hatred and violence in the Qur’an kills many, many more people than “Islamophobia” ever has or ever will, and so it is far more deserving than “Islamophobia” of a month of its own.