French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  

Back     Printer Friendly Version  

Wednesday, June 24, 2009

Bookmark and Share

Sarkozy is right - Ban the Burqa, the Hijab and the Niqab

Women are not meat, the property of men, nor dogs to be branded.

by Ferdinand III





There are many good reasons to ban the moving bed sheet attire, apparently so deeply coveted as status symbols by Muslim women. Even if one is dubious of Islam's claim that its women really do like looking like unmade gliding beds, there are societal and cultural reasons why the Hijab should be banned. In short banning the Burqa, the Hijab and the Niqab would ban Islam's direct and anti-social assault on Western values.

Many girls are murdered across the Islamic world, some for the petty crime of not wanting to look like their parents unmade bed. Covering women up is not necessarily mandated in the Koran, but it stems from Arab culture and their misogynistic attitude towards the female. In Arab and Muslim culture the male rules, the female obeys, and the female is branded as a piece of property, a cow, a man's dog, chattel to serve and please the man. This is one of the keystones of Arab and Islamic culture and of Islam supremacism. Islam is a male dominated cult.

But the Muslim fetish for bed-sheet wear goes beyond even simple misogyny. It is a direct assault on the West. If you read Ed Hussein's book on 'Why I became an Islamist and left', the former English Muslim makes it very clear that women wear the bed sheet dress to express superiority over Western values, and to assert their distinctiveness. They wear the Burqa [complete body covering including the hands], the Jilbab, [full body covering with the face open]; the Hijab [headscarf with the face left open], or the Niqab [full body covering with only the eyes visible]; as a statement of Islamic superiority. It is a conscious act of Muslim supremacism. Done to intimidate the West.

Should we put up with this?

Bed sheets and their anti-Westen, female-branding are outlawed in public spaces in Holland, France, Germany, and Turkey. The UK, Australia, Canada and the US need to follow suit. Melanie Philips the author of 'Londinistan, How Britain is Creating a Terror State Within', recently told an audience at the Middle East Forum in London that 'wearing the Niqab and Burka or Burqa, was a political act used by Muslims to show that they did not want to integrate or intend to observe our laws by sending a message that their loyalty is only to Allah.'

And that is exactly why it is a problem. But it goes even deeper than Islamic arrogance. It also denigrates, whether they admit or know it, the Muslim female.

In the United States, Newsweek reported that the wearing of a hijab [or the headscarf] was on the increase among American born Muslim university students. The Saudi-financed Wahhabist front organisation CAIR [Council on American Islamic Relations], who has direct ties to Hamas and Hizbollah [party of God], legal advisor, Arsalan Ifhtikar declared that, 'The hijab is the walking symbol of Islam.' Again another open admission of Islamic bravado and supremacism.

In the UK the Burqa [a total head and body covering] has been barred from classrooms in the UK, and it is illegal in public places in five Belgian towns, and the Dutch legislature has banned it altogether. In Italy the country's 'Charter of Values, Citizenship and Immigration', calls face coverings unacceptable, though still not illegal. A courtroom in the United States has expelled a Burqa wearing women on the grounds that it affronted person recognition.


Wouldn't banning Muslim dress affront their 'religion'?

Yes and that is precisely the point. Islam is not a religion. It is a 3000 year old Arabian moon cult with all the attendant features that such a pagan savagery entails. It is ritualised, primitive, patriarchal and anti-modern. If scientology is not a religion than neither is a moon cult.

Western societies do not embrace paganism. Shamans are not allowed to run naked screaming down our streets covered by shamanistic body art because their ideology says they should do that. Druids and Wiccans don't float down our avenues wearing their neo-lithic garb and hair styles. There are numerous laws covering dress and undress. These laws were enacted to protect society and enforce some code of sartorial conformity. They also allow us to be civil, courteous, and amongst strangers, connected.

Within Europe and North America Islam has no natural law; human right or legal claim to be outside of Western culture and mores. Wearing a flowing bedsheet which covers the person is a direct statement of confrontation with the host society. It states boldly that they, the Islamic woman, rejects Western society. If you argue that this is freedom of choice than fine – it is society's freedom of collective choice to reject such supremacism and demand that the initiator take her attitude and her linen-wear, back to the home country. This is not Arabia.

Many Muslim women are forced to wear the bed room attire. A Montreal mosque has posted on its Web site a warning to the effect that if young girls took off their Hijab, they could end up getting raped and having 'illegitimate children.' Most Muslim girls are repeatedly told that if they take off their Hijab, they would cease to be Muslims: 'By removing your hijab, you have destroyed your faith. Islam means submission to Allah in all our actions.'

Therein lies the set of problems. Wearing the Muslim dress is not only anti-social and anti-Western, it is at its root, whether the female realises it or not, anti-female. It is a pathetic form of branding, denoting the woman as Allah's slave, and later in life, as the meat and property of her husband.

It is as crude a branding as the pokers used on cattle, or collars on a dog. By so branding a female, Muslim men ensure compliance to themselves and the cult of Allah; and importantly, they destroy the female sense of independence, free will and freedom of thought and choice. These fundamental values are at the core of Western society. Islam rejects them all. And so too does any woman who enjoys or feels empowered wearing a bed sheet. They are so utterly degenerated and foreign that no amount of multi-cult piety and love exists to reform what cannot be changed – namely, a mental and psychological derangement.

It is obvious why the Muslim bed sheet sartorial splendor needs to be abolished. It is a symbol of everything that is wrong with Islam and everything that Islam rejects from the West. Free will, natural law rights, transparency, openness, social liberation – these and more are soundly rejected by the Hijab covered female and her male oppressors.

Have you ever tried as an infidel pig, worthless in the eyes of the Hijab wearing Muslim female, to carry on a polite conversation ? Hello, how are you, nice bed sheet you have on today, glowing colors, you look fabulous, going out for a stroll in 35 C heat today are we ? Good luck with that. You are ignored. They don't even look you in the eye. They could care less if you were breathing or if you were on the ground skewered and bleeding. They would step around you and never look down. No help and no interest from the linen-people. Bed-room wear is almost pathologically an anti-social statement.

Whether the Muslim woman agrees with the above is immaterial. It is the greater society and culture which are put at risk by this morbid display of anti-Western hatred. We are the West, and we are superior. Muslim women, liberate yourselves and remove your bedsheets. If you can't, have a nice trip back to the greater Arabian empire. Take up your rights concerns in the land of your pagan Allah.


Article Comments:

Related Articles:

Islamic history


7/8/2020:  Islam’s endless expansion

5/15/2020:  Why does no one discuss Arab Imperialism?

3/19/2020:  The Muslim Millet System – an imperialist tool.

3/15/2017:  Sura 3 and the Battles of Badr & Uhud - Jihad is mandatory for Moslems

4/27/2015:  Belloc and the primitive, savage Turk who was a perfect fit for the cult of Muhammad.

3/2/2015:  Moslem Jihad is the opposite of the Christian idea of waging war.

1/29/2015:  Muhammadan Jihad against Syria and the Byzantines. A turning point in history.

5/19/2014:  Edward Grant and the myth that Medieval man did not know about the fantasy of Aristotle

5/19/2014:  Edward Grant and the poverty of the Islamic church merged with the state

1/10/2014:  Islam's war against Christ's church

1/8/2014:  Hise and the Moslem war against the Christian world

1/7/2014:  Islam hates Christianity - it always has, it always will.

10/13/2011:  Will the Great Man the uncreated Obama, go back to Cairo and apologize?

9/14/2011:  Allah's pagan shrine was built in 1000 B.C. ?

8/8/2011:  Idi Amin, another Moslem despot – or maybe he was a 'Christian'?

7/29/2011:  John Gilchrist and Islamic paganism

7/21/2011:  Cults don't tolerate Infidel shrines.

6/10/2011:  Hitti and the Moon Deity or Allah

6/8/2011:  Intro to: 'History of the Arabs', by Philip K. Hitti, 1937 10th edition 2002.

4/23/2011:  Constantinople 1453

4/2/2011:  Islamic imperialism was total, not 'tolerant'

1/26/2011:  The Muslim Jihad against Russia. Without Russian resolve, half of Europe would be Islamic.

1/25/2011:  Chechnya and the Jihad against Russia. 800 years of Muslim aggression.

1/22/2011:  Muslim Barbarity in the 14th century in India.

1/20/2011:  Muslim Barbarity in the 14th and 15th centuries; a short list

1/2/2011:  Muslim barbarity: 12th and 13th centuries

PDF 12/15/2010   Excerpt from Paganism and Fascism, Chapter 4 - pages 140 to 141

12/9/2010:  Muslim barbarity: 10th and 11th centuries

PDF 12/8/2010   Excerpt from Paganism and Fascism, Chapter 4 - pages 138 to 139

PDF 12/6/2010   Excerpt from Paganism and Fascism, Chapter 4 - pages 136 to 137

12/4/2010:  Muslim barbarity against the Infidel – the 9th century.

11/30/2010:  Muslim barbarity against the Infidel – the 8th century.

11/26/2010:  Muslim barbarity against the Infidel – the 7th century.

PDF 11/22/2010   Excerpt from Paganism and Fascism, Chapter 4 – Party and Leader - pages 134 to 135

PDF 11/18/2010   Excerpt from Paganism and Fascism, Chapter 4 on The Islamic Moon Cult - pages 132 to 133

PDF 11/15/2010   Excerpt from Paganism and Fascism, Chapter 4 on The Islamic Moon Cult - pages 130 to 131

PDF 11/9/2010   Excerpt from Paganism and Fascism, Chapter 4 on The Islamic Moon Cult - pages 128 to 129

7/15/2009:  July 15 1099 – one of the great days in history. Jeru-salem retaken.

5/22/2008:  Islam's imperialist nature – never discussed, never revealed.

3/16/2008:  Tours, Lepanto, Vienna, now Iraq and Kosovo

5/4/2007:  The disaster of Arab Imperialism