French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  

Back

Islamic history - Recent Articles

Islam’s endless expansion

1400 years of Jihad is not going to end unless we stand and fight.

Bookmark and Share

Some obvious truisms. No Arabs were resident in Israel in 587 BC when the first Jewish temple was destroyed by the Babylonians. No Muslims existed in Persia until it was conquered circa 645 AD. No Muslims were resident in Turkey, in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in India or in North Africa, Spain, the Balkans, and Russia, nor in the Asian south-east until Islam wiped out all local cultures and beliefs or relegated them to ‘dhimmi’ or slave status. Islam was, and still is, spread by war. 

 

Today the Moslem war of Jihad finds its expression not only in ISIS, Boko Harem, The Moslem Brotherhood, The Nation of Islam, Palestinian Jihad, Hizbollah and 100 other Moslem-Jihad groups (literally there are about 100 Moslem Fascist organisations), but even more ominously and destructively; in an un-ending invasion of ‘migrants’, open-borders, demography, the creation of local mosques and the infiltration of the Police, School systems, Government and Political parties.  The Moslem fifth column will topple some Western states starting around 2040 when Moslems are in many urban centres (especially in Europe), over 40% of the population.

 

There is nothing positive about the spread of Muhammadanism.  Nothing.  Not a single defender of Muhammad’s cult can point to a real-world benefit of his cult’s war on humanity.  This pagan Arab ideology has killed in 1400 years, at least 300 million people.  By definition it cannot be a ‘religion’.  If Islam is religious, then so too was Hitlerism. Much like a modern Atheist-Fascism (the Nazis were Atheists, who believed in Evolution, survival of the fittest, Darwinian socialism); Islam’s premodern paganism is a political construct built for war.  Nothing in the Koran, Sharia law, Arab culture or Islamic theocratic governance is spiritual, religious, peaceful, or harmonious.  Islam’s bloody history makes this apparent as does its handbook of terror ‘Recital’ (Koran).

 

When the robber politician Mohammed died, his legacy lived on.  Before he died his later ‘revelations’ once he attained power and control, were almost wholly devoted to the idea of jihad, conquering non-Muslims and the establishment of a worldwide Muslim empire. Stealing, killing, lying, warring, having sex with sundry females of all ages including pre-pubescent girls; and the codification of Arab culture [deceit, pride, hypocrisy, crudity] into ‘laws’ ensured that Islam would be the opposite of Christianity. By melding church and state into monotheistic totalitarianism Mohammed had created an ideology more powerful even that that of the pagan Nazi or Soviet cults.

 

After Mohammed’s death in 630 AD the Muslim empire quickly grew. One of Mohammed’s last pronouncements was to conquer the Persian and Byzantium empires. Apparently, the fascist Mohammed did not take kindly to having his letters suggesting that the emperors of these 2 empires submit to Islam, ignored. By 645 AD Persia had fallen and Byzantium barely survived various Muslim attacks, finally succumbing in 1453 AD to the Ottoman Turks who butchered the survivors of Constantinople in an all too typical show of Arab and Muslim barbarity. 40.000 Christians were slaughtered by the Moslems at Constantinople.  Another 40.000 sold into slavery.  Apparently the enslavement of Whites is fine for modern Marxists and Moslem apologists.

 

This swift advance of Muslim armies, over 70 years, on horseback, in tight formations, fired by their belief in an afterlife, and by the gleam of booty, gold and women, reads like a pre-modern version of Nazi blitzkrieg:

-633 AD Campaigns in Bahrain, Oman, Yemen, and Hadramaut. Raids in Iraq.

-634 AD Battle of Basra, Battle of Damascus, Battle of Ajnadin, Battle of Namaraq, Battle of Saqatia.

-635 AD Battle of Bridge, Battle of Buwaib, Conquest of Damascus, Battle of Fahl.

-636 AD Battle of Yarmuk, Battle of Qadsiyia, Conquest of Madain.

-637 AD Conquest of Syria, Conquest of Jerusalem, Battle of Jalula.

-638 AD Conquest of Jazirah.

-639 AD Conquest of Khuizistan. Advance into Egypt.

-640 AD Victory in the battle of Babylon.

-641 AD Battle of Nihawand; Conquest of Alexandria in Egypt.

-642 AD Battle of Rayy in Persia; Conquest of Egypt.

-643 AD Conquest of Azerbaijan and Tabaristan (Russia).

-644 AD Conquest of Fars, Kerman, Sistan, Mekran and Kharan.

-646 AD Campaigns in Khurasan, Armenia and Asia Minor.

-647 AD Campaigns in North Africa. Conquest of the island of Cyprus.

-648 AD Campaigns against the Byzantines.

-651 AD Naval battle of the Masts against the Byzantines.

-666 AD Raid of Sicily.

-670 AD Advance in North Africa. Conquest of Kabul.

-672 AD Capture of the island of Rhodes. Campaigns in Khurasan.

-674 AD The Muslims cross the Oxus. Bukhara becomes a vassal state.

-677 AD Occupation of Samarkand and Tirmiz. Siege of Constantinople.

-682 AD North African-Arab armies march to the Atlantic.

-700 AD Campaigns against the Berbers in North Africa.

 

By 700 AD the Muslims had conquered, the Levant, Egypt, North Africa, Syria, parts of Byzantium and the entire Persian empire. The spread of Islam by Muslim force of arms over such a vast area in the span of 2 generations is remarkable. This 'jihad' was premised on the Koranic incitation to 'struggle' to overcome and subdue the ‘infidel’. Islamic jihad has remorselessly expanded from the Arabian Peninsula to the far corners of the globe through conquest, war, and in the modern world, immigration. It is a signal historical miracle that the small, poor, illiterate and pagan heartland of the Arabian Peninsula would be able to create and then export a vicious fascism that now controls 1.3 billion people worldwide. It is simply astounding.

 

The Near East, Turkey, Levant, and North Africa were Jewish, Semitic and Christian lands before 632 AD. These areas were not Arab nor Muslim until they were conquered by Muslim forces. The current Israeli-Palestinian conflict cannot be properly understood if people do not understand that in 1200 BC Jewish cities were being built and that the reigns of David and Solomon developed a prosperous Jewish state by 900 BC. Jewish civilisation far predates that of the Arab. The first Jewish temple of Solomon fell in 587 BC to the Babylonians and the Jews were expelled as slaves to Babylonia only returning in 539 BC after being freed by Cyrus the Great – the Farsi or Persian emperor. The Arabs are simply supple liars in proposing that Israeli land is somehow 'their' land. They butchered millions of Jews and Christians over 1400 years to steal land not only in Israel but throughout Syria, Lebanon, Turkey, and North Africa.

 

Remember Beirut in 1970? A Christian city in a largely Christian country. After a bloody 25-year Muslim inspired and Arafat managed civil war, Lebanon is now an Arab terrorist state having murdered over 100.000 Christians and establishing Muslim rule over what was once the Middle East's most prosperous nation state. Hizbollah, a Moslem terrorist group, now dominates Lebanese politics.  Beirut is yesterday's warning of what the future may hold throughout Europe and North America. No one in 1965 would have predicted that a largely Christian Lebanese state would be so viciously dismembered. Of course, the West stood by and did nothing while an outpost of its own civilisation collapsed.

 

It is hard to calculate the number of Jews and Christians killed by the Moslems over 14 centuries but the number is certainly in the tens of millions. For those who were not murdered there existed three options. Pay a tax and become a dhimmi or second-class citizen and slave. Convert. Or flee and have your possessions taken by the ruling Arabs. Muslims were only interested in women, gold, booty and land. Harmonious, multi-cultural accommodation was not a priority.

 

The myth that the Arab empires were some polyglot multi-cultural paradise is galling stupidity. Arabs ruled and the rest were enslaved. Peace in Islam does not mean harmony. It means Islam reigning supreme, unopposed, omnipotent. Multi-culturally sensitive it is not.

 

But it is not only the 'Saturday' and 'Sunday' people that Muslims kill. At least 50 million or more Hindu’s have been killed by the Muslims. An equal if not greater number of Buddhists have likewise perished at the hands of Muslim armies. The sheer number of butchered non-Muslims is hard to estimate in Central and South Asia, due to the enormity of the genocide and poor record keeping.

 

But we do know that starting in the 8th century AD and until today, the Muslim onslaught has been relentless conquering vast lands stretching from Pakistan to Indonesia. In modern times, Thailand, Malaysia and other areas with large Christian, Hindu or Buddhist populations have seen enormous amounts of violence and war against the ‘infidels’. These acts are rarely recorded or commented upon in the Western media.

 

As Yohanan Ramati wrote in, ‘The Islamic Danger to Western Civilization’, the lack of respect for other cultures, religions and for basic human rights means that Islam is in some degree, at least in its Koranic form, incompatible philosophically with democracy. ‘Not a single Moslem state is a democracy. When there is serious internal opposition to a Moslem ruler, his rivals sometimes demand ‘democracy’ during their bid to topple him, but never maintain it if they gain power. So there is an obvious contradiction between promoting democracy and supporting Moslem states….These contradictions are a grave American weakness, as ideological confusion hamstrings the ability to act logically and firmly.’

 

Ramati is correct. Hamas can assume power in Palestine through a democratic election and in Iraq clerical Shias and fundamentalist Sunni’s elected by a free vote, bloodily fight for control over a nation with a Constitution that enshrines Islam. There is no guarantee that democratic governance within the Muslim world will create modern nation states that will be peaceful or friendly to the West. Iraq and Palestine are obvious examples and this is why throughout the Arab-Islamic world we see so many non-democratic, family controlled or despotic regimes in place. Simply put the leadership elite of Arab Islamic countries are as terrified of fundamentalist Islam as is the West.

 

The increasing radicalization of Islam in the Middle East fuelled by petrodollars is of course finding a parallel development in Western nations. As the West imports more Muslims and watches the Islamic population grow to 5 %, 10 %, and 15 % of its total population we should expect Islamic supremacist demands to accelerate. The Islamicist’s cannot defeat the West in a head-on battle but they can defeat the Western powers through demographic and internal political change. Demography and birth rates will do to Western lands what force of arms cannot – compel political and societal change and give Muslims the opportunity to dominate Western societies.

 

The 1400-year Muslim jihad continues and Western apathy, elitist ignorance and broken foreign and domestic policy setting continues unabated blinkered by a politically correct ethos and ignorance. The Muslims are sure of themselves. We are not sure of ourselves.

Why does no one discuss Arab Imperialism?

Or is imperialism a white only 'crime'?

Bookmark and Share

 

In the Marxist version of history which dominates schools, universities and the media, Islam and Arab culture are portrayed as wonderful, peaceful expositions of high civilization. Anglo-Saxon, white European culture is depicted of course as racist, imperialistic and insufferably barren in comparison. This typifies postmodern insanity. Arab armies, gangs, thugs, and oppressors ranged out from the Arab sands circa 632 A.D. to conquer territory and convert cultures from Morocco to Indonesia, to accept the Arab political ideology called Islam. The Western nations left their colonies. The Arabs never have. That is why the Islamic world is in such a sorry state.

 

The poverty of Arab culture informs Islam.

 

Without the Arabs of course Islam would not have existed. Unless you believe that ‘Allah’ the moon deity, instead of choosing Arabic, would have picked another obscure language like say for instance Swahili, Mongol, or maybe Gaelic Welsh. Perhaps he would have identified not the Arabs, but the plucky Nepali, Bush-man, or the redoubtable rice farmer from Han China, or those marauding Danes, to be the distribution channel of his monotheistic gibberish contained in the Koran.

 

But alas for mankind it was the desperate pagans of Arabia, steeped in moon cult fetishism, poverty, illiteracy and losing out to Jews and Christians in the market of ideas, economics and political power, which were chosen by the great moon deity, to disseminate ideas about supremacism, world-domination and submission to Islam – and by extension eradicating all competitive beliefs.

 

Arab imperialism has never gone away. Say what you want about Western imperialism but the West eventually left their empires – sometimes much to the detriment of the conquered territory. Contrary to Marxist revisionism Western imperialism was not a net negative. The most successful empire morally, economically and politically was the British. If a ‘native’ culture was conquered by the British it was usually much to their benefit. Occupation by the French was likewise in most cases, a net positive gain for the subjected land in question. Even Russian civilisational development of central and east Asia and Siberia had before the Communist revolution, a positive impact on non-Russian lands. The same cannot be said of German, Belgian or Italian imperialism.

 

In these expansions education, medicine, infrastructure and modern political-economic theory were exported to conquered lands. Dragging backwards cultures into the modern era was part of what Kipling called the white man’s burden. On balance given the long view of history, European ‘white’ imperialism was of course inevitable. Globalising markets, globalised supply sources of raw material, international trade routes, and military balances of power all mandated an expansion by Europe into the New World, Asia and Africa.

 

White imperialism premised on early forms of capitalism and the rapid development of our modern world, is in fact part of a civilizing mission to bring political-economic and cultural stimulation to primitive areas of the globe. While unbalanced, violent, bloody and chaotic such a process in the longer-term view of history is necessary and moral.

 

Even after taking into account the barbarity enacted by some Westerners against particular native cultures, on balance, the process was one of civilization not of regression. Africa in the past 50 years proves that point. Uganda is not better off since the British have left. Nigeria (increasingly Moslem dominated), Ghana, Zimbabwe, Kenya, and Egypt are worse off.  With the Marxist ANC controlling South Africa and initiating an anti-White program of retribution (ignored by the Fake News Media), we can add South Africa to list of states which were better off under British control.

 

In 1950 per capita GDP in Ghana was higher than in South Korea. Thanks to US military protection against North Korea, US and European investment in Korean markets and a Western styled political-economic system, South Korea is now a rich industrialized country exporting product to the world. In the past 50 years the Africans have collected $700 billion in welfare from richer White nations. The African elite have used the money to buy weapons from Western nations; start wars; enact genocides; hide money in Swiss bank accounts and engage in the rape and destruction of the world’s richest continent. There is a reason why India has lifted 300 million out of poverty in the past 40 years and Africa has not. And it has nothing to do with White oppression – quite the opposite.  

 

Nigeria, rich in oil and other resources, with a commanding presence on the Atlantic trade routes is now riven by a Moslem dominated civil war against Christians - studiously ignored by the Fake News media.  Moslems murder 20 Christians a day on average in Nigeria.  The economy is roughly 1/5 of what it should be in size, and per capita living standards a tithe of what the country's potential would indicate they should be.  Is Moslemifying Nigeria better or worse off, without British protection?  The problem in Nigeria is Muhammadism, and Arab culture. 

 

The extended Arab empire, which now enslaves almost 2 billion cult members, is a shamble and a mess.  It has been for at least 1000 years, when the Christian and Zoroastrian empires, upon which the Arab hordes had feasted, began to wither and die – the host being sucked dry by the parasites.

 

From Morocco to Indonesia, the Arabs during 200 years conquered, subdued and converted non Moslems. The resident cultures; Jews, Christians, Greeks and Semitics in the Near East; Berbers, Christians, animists, Jews, Semitics in North Africa; Farsi, Turks and Pathans in Central Asia; and various ethnicities from India to Bali; were all converted or conquered by marauding Arab armies. The Arabs brought with them Islam – the epitome and embodiment of Arab culture.

 

Culture is king. Islam came from Arabia and is premised on a 3.000 year old moon cult. It only stands to reason that the moon cult practices of Arabia embody the ideology of Islam. Islam is of course not a religion but a construct to organize and subdue society. The main ideas of Islam; submission; blind loyalty; ritual; a belief in little devils; kissing of holy rocks; male supremacy; the union of church and state; and a swaggering prideful intolerance all come from Arab culture. You can’t divorce British culture and English institutional development. The Magna Carta, parliamentary democracy, the industrial revolution all came from a certain culture. It is the same with Islam.

 

The great Arab invention was of course Islam. There was no golden age of Islamic development. Arabs conquered, squatted and managed more advanced empires – the Jews, the Christian states, Byzantium, Persia, the Egyptians and so on. The Muslims invented nothing. All the so-called inventions by Muslims – some in medicine, some in math, some in astrology – all came from previous societies and other cultures. Nestorian Christians for example were the ones to ‘discover’ ancient Greek writings on medicine and advanced calculus and geometry, all of which pre-dated Arab imperialism by 1100 years.

 

Sadly, for a large part of the world, the Arabs conquered and never left. The poverty of Islam is premised on its failed Arab culture and paganism. Compare today the Arab culture of Lebanon, Iraq, Syria, Egypt, Libya and Morocco with the plurality of Israel, France or the USA. There is a reason why Islam is a fascist disaster. The reason comes from its Arab cultural heritage and legacy. Incredibly no one in the West discusses it. If the ‘neo-con’ crusading American is to be criticized for the failed Iraqi project, why then is no one demanding a roll back of Arab imperialism, and its destructive ideological construct named Islam?

The Muslim Millet System – an imperialist tool.

Taking over land without buying the title.

Bookmark and Share



The Millet system is a peculiar Muslim system pre-dating the Ottoman empire with its roots in Sharia law. The Millet system is alive and well today from Europe to Iran. Its basis is reasonably simple and was worked out for centuries – the dhimmis or infidels would be allowed some loose self governance within a Muslim state, but it would be the Muslims who owned the land, the tax revenues and who would dominate the political hierarchy. The import of the Millet system is that whenever a Muslim majority exists, the Muslims expect and demand land ownership. This will be a serious issue for Europe in the next generation.