Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was superior to anything Islam had developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions. Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'. Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.
Screaming Marxists and bomb-throwing Muslims cannot obfuscate the obvious – Islam was, is and always will be, a complete failure. Look around the modern world, what did the Muslims invent? [and no the zero was a Hindu invention]. What enlightened spiritually have they given the world? What advances in thought, science, society, architecture, or business has the Arabic-Islamic culture given the world? Answer; absolutely nothing. Or do you really believe that a ritualised cult, premised on 7th century pre-modern ideals is the great petri-dish of innovative vigor and excellence?
Islam has never invented anything. Muslim apologists point to all sorts of absurdity and jump and down, while crying, 'see the Muslims created that!'. Grow up. Imbibing Muslim propaganda and consuming fantastical claims while ignoring when, how and why the modern world was created does not a tolerant multi-cult lover make. It just means you are rather dim.
Like the Muslims, the Russians had the same trick with the mysterious but omnipotent 'Popov', the master creator of the universe, appearing everywhere. The Russians still celebrate Popov-day to honor the mythical man who apparently invented the radio and the cathode ray tube – no thanks to Marconi, Edison, Tesla et al. No one knows if Popov really existed [there was a minor scientist by the name, who lived in the mid-19th century, but he did not invent anything of note], but for the Communists that did not matter. Popov was the representation of Soviet reality – the classless man who defeated the immoral, bourgeois West, in scientific invention. That is to say, the fantasy of Popov was to express what should have been true, but which was only a piece of Soviet propaganda.
The Nazi's of course had their heroic legends as well. Absurdly the Nazi's were convinced that their descendants were of Aryan stock [in actual fact the Aryans are traced to Persian, and northern India], who were physically, mentally, and culturally superior to all other races. In Hitler's race based theory, this Aryan stock was responsible for European culture or at least the vast superiority of German culture versus that of the rest. Sub-humans must then bow down to the Aryan wunderkind. For the Nazi's all the great feats of modern living and culture were the direct result of Aryan-German effort and brilliance. From Beethoven, to Frederick, to Bismarck, to architecture, to military technology, the Germans had invented any and everything of modern interest. It was the Communist lie about Popov on a racial scale. That is at least what was fed to the German people during the 1930s.
The Muslims do the same. In Muslim legend those peaceful, honest, culturally sublime Arabs and friends were not busy with war, expanding the Islamic empire, slave trading, pursuing women and gold – of course not. They were in earnest and thoughtful conversation and study, extremely occupied with setting up hospitals, universities, scientific institutes, and inventing algebra, medicine, manned-flight, culinary masterpieces, architectural wonders, and all manners of devices to improve the life, liberty and potential of the average human.
Really they were. The Arabs of course as all the Muslim apologists know, not only saved the West from its 'Dark Age' barbarism, but actually invented the modern world! You can't be a denier! Without the profundity and remorseless energy and intelligence of the Arabs and their Muslim friends, Europe would still be nothing more than a forested land of infected and uneducated half-humans unable to spell Aristotle, let alone comprehend the writings of Galen, Socrates, Aeschylus, Thales, Euclid, Pythagoras and a variety of other ancient writers – who must of course have stolen their ideas from the pagan Arabs. As everyone knows Aristotle who tutored Alexander was really named Mohammad.
Not one single invention attributed by the Muslims to themselves were invented by the Arabs or their conquered Muslim slave-states. Arab imperialism has given the world nothing but a sick culture of paternalistic violence, bomb-throwing, racism and hatred of all things modern. All the usual suspects of supposed Arab and Islamic prowess; the astrolabe; algebra, architecture, the zero, and 'medicine', were all invented, built, extended, developed, and used by others – far more advanced than the Arab-Islamic slave states.
For the hard of reading, advanced mathematics was a Greek invention, as was medicine [Muslims can't perform biopsies or autopsies which severely limits medicial inquiry]; algebra was built by a 3nd century Christian [Diophantus] who based his work on ancient Greek texts; the zero comes from the Hindus [about 100 million of which were murdered by Arab armies]; advances in sea-faring including the astrolabe date from Byzantium and the Phoenician fleets; and the complex of scientific inquiry and rational methods had to wait until Bede, Francis Bacon the I, and the application of higher math to solve scientific laws. I don't recall Bede, Bacon, or the founders of rational thought being named Mohammed.
Even in architecture the Arabs took advanced engineering works and concepts from Byzantium, the Jews and Persia to create what some might call an Arab-style. They invented nothing knew but amalgamated existing ideas. In fact all the artisanal and architectural works of the Arab-Islamic states were performed by engineers who were not Muslim or had converted to Islam but in fact were Greek, Persian, Jewish or formerly Christian.
There is not one single record or fact which exists which can prove that the Arabs improved upon existing engineering techniques. In 500 B.C. the Carthaginians had running water [a semitic group originally from Lebanon]; in 1100 B.C. the ancient Greeks had invented advanced arch forms; in 540 B.C. the Persians had constructed vast and improbably great irrigation systems. What were the Arabs and 'pre-Muslims' doing during these epochs? Mired in hate, violence and illiteracy one imagines.
Even during the period of Islamic expansion the Muslims created nothing new or innovative. Hospitals were a Christian idea. Scientific institutes were formalised by the ancient Athenians. Rational inquiry took root in 500 B.C. in Ionia – among the Greeks. The creation of towns and social structures lies with the Jews – Jericho is the oldest city in the world. Running water, sewers, irrigation and crop rotation were perfected by the Romans and Persians. Monotheism was of course in the main a Jewish invention, though the 10th century B.C. Persians did have Zoroastrianism – a precursor to Jewish monotheism.
The Arab-Muslim invention of note is of course the Koran. A text of violence, supremacism, racism and vitriol. It is the imperial tool par excellence. Submit, be taxed, exile yourself, or die! Other than this pagan-fascist manuscript not much except spices, some textiles and camels, has come out of Arabia. But of course the Arabs must have invented trade, commerce, banking, and the division of labor! [between ruling Muslims and slaves, one imagines].
Consider this – fascisms don't invent, they destroy. Paganisms don't create they ritualise. The only creation of a fascism or a pagan cult, is either death, or mindless propaganda to support the supremacist ideal. Mohammad, the Koran, the political objectives of Dar-al Islam vs. Dar Al Harb [non-believers], makes Islamic ideology fascist and quite primitive. No private property, no respect for rights, no inquiry, no debate, no need for freedom, no need for equality or justice - just submit to a leader and its government. Ossified Islam is the anti-thesis of any societal construction which allows the blossoming of rationality, science and perforce – the creation of anything we might call modern.
Like the Nazis and Communists the Arabs and Muslims are good at using propaganda. Be very careful believing the myths around Islam. The reality of the 5 senses should tell you otherwise. Or do you really think that an ideology which commands complete submission and obedience, and which was spread by war and violence is somehow civilized?
The Millet system is a peculiar Muslim system pre-dating the Ottoman empire with its roots in Sharia law. The Millet system is alive and well today from Europe to Iran. Its basis is reasonably simple and was worked out for centuries – the dhimmis or infidels would be allowed some loose self governance within a Muslim state, but it would be the Muslims who owned the land, the tax revenues and who would dominate the political hierarchy. The import of the Millet system is that whenever a Muslim majority exists, the Muslims expect and demand land ownership. This will be a serious issue for Europe in the next generation.
At the risk of going to jail for 'thought crimes', it is laughingly obvious to any who study the political-economy, that the cult of multiculturalism, was always destined to fail. Uni-cultures, premised on natural law rights, freedom, political representation, open-trade, and military preparedness survive. Multi-cults who posit the inane and immoral idea that all cultures are the same and that the history's of all people are 'similar and important' create states riven by group 'rights', ghetto mentalities and the destructiveness of state power. The multi-cult is the surest path for a state to force 'conformity', elevate its power to ensure 'equality of cultures', and indoctrinate its citizenry in the cult of the state, as it deposes and reduces the original majoritorian culture to a theology which not only must be rejected, but even criminalized. Thus, if you criticise the failure of a moon-cult from Mecca, and dare to argue that Muslim baths, worship rooms, and state-financed mosques are deleterious to the greater society, than you must be punished and imprisoned for hate crimes.
Lately major European political figures have pointed out the obvious that Islamic non-culture does not integrated with host cultures. Why should it? The Koran is very clear in its racism and supremacism. Infidels burn in hell for not following the Allah-thing and only Muslims will be blest with ever-lasting bounty and ease in heaven. Maybe individual Muslims do integrate nicely into European or North American society. Maybe not. No one knows what the individual thinks or does. But it is a certainty that the cultural cant of his cult is magnificiently supremacist and puts itself at Jihadic odds with the host society. There is no disputation about that fact. Muslim demands as their populations grow will only intensify. The internal multi-cult war within the West will only accelerate in sharpness and querelousness as Islam swaggers in to fill the spiritual-social void ripped apart by Western cultural Marxism and massive, unbridled, illiterate statism. Where there is almost unlimited state power and despotism, we know that ignorance, the destruction of natural law rights and individuality; and the evisceration of true culture is never far behind.
The Multi-cult cult, is a terrible idea in both practice and reality. There is no moral, social, economic or cultural relativity between states, empires, locales, or histories. None. The Ottoman empire was a despotic Orientalized brutality whose practice in slavery, Christian destruction and unlimited Jihadic warfare was echoed by its savaged populations in which poverty, illiteracy, ritualization and fear all competed for attention. This culture had nothing in common with northern Italy's rebirth, nor with the Gouden-Eeuw or Golden age of maritime Holland, nor with the Christian imperial spread of Catherine's Russia across Central Asia. Middle class Britain laughed at by the fascist despot Napoleon, had little in common with the ruins of non-societies one would have found in 19th century Persia, Turkey, Africa or Saudi Arabia.
The truth is this: there is no cultural relativity whatsoever between Western development and the Orientalisms of Asia and Islam. Western history is simply superior. This is not to say that all matters of Western development are moral in our modern sense of that word. But likewise it is also rather obtuse and disingenuous to apply today's standard of morality – a Western invention – to past Western epochs, but not to say Islamic history or Arab imperialist expansion. Thus the US which fought a civil war to end slavery in which 400.000 Blacks were brought to the US in chains and whose population had grown by 1860 to 2 million, is vilified even today as a racist-white power culture. Yet Islam still sanctions, practices and trades in slavery, including the sex slavery of women. Islam never fought, and never will fight a war to liberate slaves. The Koran says that slavery is fine. Mohammed traded in slaves and had 12 or more sex concubines. Ergo for Muslims and the Koranic cult, slavery is fine. What 'relativity' then makes Islam just as exalted as US culture?
The sickenss of the multi-cult club should be obvious. But perversely this illness is a touchstone of modern political certainty. The logic is vapid but oft-repeated - the more multi-cult your country is, the more superior it must be. The multi-cult propaganda, sponsored by the state is endless, extolling in a mindless sort of way, the supposed virtues of tolerance, diversity, respect and humanity. In actual fact of course, the ineluctable outcome of the multi-cult fetish, one enforced upon society by the state, is the opposite of what is proposed. The most rabid of the multi-cult lovers including state human rights commissions and their political masters are the most intolerant and un-diverse of minds and attitudes. The multi-cult thus morphs into something that it demonizes – an intolerant despotism.
The multi-cult signals a failure not only of society, but of state interference in the organic growth of the nation state.
Is Bernard Lewis correct that Europe will become Muslim or Islamicized within, or before the end of this century? It appears that demography and fanatical motive force, including adherence to the regressive and unenlightened Koran, favour the Musulmans and perhaps support Bernard's languorous and dim view.
Islamic theology is remorselessly expansionist. We know this from history, the endless Jihad and Islamic liturgy. Koranic exegesis for example demands that the entire world submit to the moon deity Il, Al, Ali, or El-Allah. Individual Muslims like individual Nazis, or Communists in times past, might be indifferent to this imperialist philosophy and the demands, precepts and expectations of the cult. They might reject expansionism, war, Jihad, violence and hate. But their cult and most of its leadership, now and in centuries past, certainly demand and have impelled such expressions of will-to-power and supremacism. The problem with Islam, is simply Islamic theology and the merger of church, state, society, culture and rituals into an ossified, corrupt and natural-law denying despotism.
The Europe of our past and imaginations, the great flower of civilisation might well cease to exist between 2050 and 2100. Contrary to EU government lies there are about 40 million Muslims in Western Europe out of a population of 350 million. By 2050 the number of Muslims will be over 100 million out of a similar total population. Europeans are not reproducing. Muslim women have on average 3 to 4 children. European women 1.2. Immigration will still favour Muslim migrants. The Muslim ability to not only produce 4 offspring on average per woman, but to engage in what in essence is unfettered family based immigration means of course that in many European urban centers Europeans or 'Whites' [as the pejorative label would have it]; will be a minority. Only in the non-urban hinterland will non-Muslims still be in the majority by 2050.
Europe is now experiencing a new and novel but still vicious onslaught of unbridled Islamism. A main concern of any European should be Islam. Will Europe succumb to Islamic theology in toto, or in partis? The elite and media have certainly surrendered. Islam is a barren poli-cracy of power, control and oppression.
Demographic facts are stubbornly against White European culture. Will demography and the empty silliness of cultural Marxism force Europeans to finally succumb to Muslim depredations, in train since the 710 AD invasion of Spain ? Or will they actually summon some resolve and fight back to preserve what was once the unique genius of Judeo-Christian civilization ? If so will Europe experience a civil war?
Many in Europe are beginning to agree with Lewis and freedom fighters such as Geert Wilders. Anti-Koran and anti-Islamist parties now exist in many EU states. It might be too little too late however. Dutch politician and former EU Competition Commissioner, Fritz Bolkenstein said the obvious some time ago about Europe's Islamcization.
The second problem, Bolkestein warned, is that immigration is turning the E.U. into "an Austro-Hungarian empire on a grand scale." He alluded to certain great cities that will soon be minority-European--two of the most important of which, Amsterdam and Rotterdam, are in his own country--and warned that the (projected) addition of 83 million Muslim Turks would further the Islamization of Europe. It was this part of his speech--in which he referred to Lewis's projections--that made headlines around the world:
"Current trends allow only one conclusion," Bolkestein said. "The USA will remain the only superpower. China is becoming an economic giant. Europe is being Islamicized."
Bolkenstein's assessment that the US will still be a super-power in the future is open to question given the embrace of mind-numbing cults such as relativity, abiogenesis, Darwinism, Globaloneywarming, Climatechange, open-borders, LGBQT, socialism, and transnationalism.
Regardless his fears about Europe are accurate. Mark Steyn and others have written endlessly about the lack of reproduction in Europe. The welfare state neuters many cultural, social and economic artifacts – one being a cult of life. Why bother having children when the world revolves around your own hubristic desires and life is but one long joyful, sex-filled, coffee-addled vacation ? Raising little ones is so tiresome and so un-progressive.
Muslims see the world differently. In Muslim theology the entire planet as Dar-al-Islam – the house of Islam. Islam can't defeat the West through military and economic competition. But it can surely out-breed it. The Muslim 'Millett' system, established during the Ottoman empire, represents the Islamic attitude to 'rights'. Once Muslims become a majority in an area they assume that they should own title to the land and implement Muslim Sharia law in opposition to infidel law. Throughout Europe this fact is emerging in almost every major urban center where Muslims claim ghettoes and Arabicized or Islamicized enclaves as beyond the powers of the host society.
As Muslim demands on the welfare state increase – more state money for mosques, Muslim only schools, recognition of Muslim holidays, institutions of Sharia Law – some Europeans will react. When Muslims and their political puppets begin to distort European political and foreign policy, some Europeans will react. When Muslim culture comes to dominate and over-ride that of the indigineous European culture, some Europeans will react.
The question is how many Europeans will react to the Muslim takeover of the Continent and what will happen?
One path will lead to civil war. In this scenario the military still controlled by the Europeans, along with para-military citizen militia will declare a war of survival and physically assault Muslim mini-states, strong-holds, and urbanized redoubts. This would be an asymmetrical war, an urban war, one premised on the viciousness of Stalingrad and one which would take years to play out.
Another path is political and cultural appeasement and surrender. In this scenario Europeans accept their existential and social Dhimmitude, bowing low to Islamic cultural and intellectual fascism as being stronger, more vibrant and even 'liberating'. In this scenario Muslims and their political slaves take over political high offices including the military. In such a case we will have a world in which for example, French nuclear power is controlled by Muslim politicians or their paid acolytes.
A few years ago Daniel Pipes stated it well: “One can virtually dismiss from consideration the prospect of Muslims accepting historic Europe and integrating within it.” U.S. columnist Dennis Prager agrees: "It is difficult to imagine any other future scenario for Western Europe than its becoming Islamicized or having a civil war."
Both are correct. The European civil war might be hot or it might be very tepid and cold. It could include violence, or it might just be an unconvincing display of resolution by a radical few against a Muslim takeover, followed by a quick surrender. No one knows. But Europe is in dire straits. Between a debt implosion and financial collapse; and Islam, the future looks decidedly unsettled.
The world is very often not grey and it is usually quite black and white. Europeans have only two choices 40 to 50 years hence. Fight Islam and Muslim fascism to safeguard the remnants of European high civilization. Or meekly embrace an Arabian moon cult, and make excuses and engage in cognitive distortions as to why that is an enlightened and 'intellectually sophisticated' choice.
Great essay by Michael Copeland in The Gates of Vienna Blog below, about ‘mis-interpretations’, or the painfully ridiculous ‘Islamist’ label; applied to the 100 or so violent Moslem Jihad groups and the millions of Moslem world-wide who support a Caliphate, ISIS, and Global Hegemony of the Al-Lah Muhammadan cult (in Mein Koran, it is hard to tell the difference at times between the Moon idol Hubal or Al-Lah, the ‘God’ or ‘Lord’ of Mecca and mad Mohammed, whose family were the caretakers of the Hub’Al shrine).
But in the low information, stunted IQ of the modern world and within the Western-Secular Religion of relativity, historical rewriting, scientific atavism, factual ignorance and reality-avoidance, the poor little Muhammadans are always the victims, the sufferers, the poor, the blighted, or perversely, the genius, the innovator, the inventor, the creator, the expert.
The cult of Muhammad is rarely viewed for what it is – a supremacist, intolerant, racist, fascistic cult of power and blood.
But saying the Truth today means you are an Alt-right, bigoted, Nazi, KKK, Phobe who denies Science.
Colour is mine.
“It’s Their Interpretation of Islam”
by Michael Copeland
“Ah, but it’s their interpretation of Islam”, we are assured by smooth-talking muslim speakers. Journalists have picked this up, and dutifully write about “an extremist interpretation” that lies behind the latest atrocity. This assurance about interpretation is surprisingly successful. It is designed to make us doubt what Islam’s source texts mean, including — and this is the crafty part — those whose meaning is clear and obvious. We can easily be taken in by this appealing and fair-sounding assertion. It puts us off the scent. That is the idea.
First, it is necessary to clarify what is meant by an “interpretation”. If an instruction says “give away one tenth of your income to charity”, that does not require an interpretation. The meaning is quite clear, and the instruction can be exactly followed. An “interpretation” is different. Say a politician repeatedly evades an interviewer’s question with some bland generalisation. Eventually the interviewer says, “I’ll take that as a ‘No’”. That is an interpretation. It is quite a different matter from the straightforward following of what a text says.
Bearing in mind that the Koran — all of it — forms part of Islam’s law, how does the “interpretation” allegation stand up to the test?
Let us see. We can take commands and instructions from the Koran and Hadith and compare them with what muslim leaders and speakers say.
Hatred
Koran 60:4 praises the “excellent pattern” shown by Ibrahim when he said (to the Jews):
“Between us and you enmity and hatred forever….”.
How do the spokesmen treat that?
· Osama bin Laden: “Enmity and hate shall forever reign between us.”
· Osama bin Laden: “Battle, animosity, and hatred — from the Muslim to the infidel — is the foundation of our religion.”
· islamqa.com: “Muslims in the West must have … enmity and hatred of the kaffirs.”
· Alminbar.com: “You should hate them, disown them and their religion.”
· Abu Usama, Birmingham: “No one loves the kuffaar. We hate kuffaar.”
· Anjem Choudary: “As a muslim I must have hatred for everything non-Islam.”
· Yousuf Makharzah, muslim cleric: “Animosity towards the Jews is an obligatory religious duty, and one of the signs of the believers.”
Killing
The Koran commands:
· “Kill the non-muslims wherever you find them” 9:5
· “Kill them wherever you overtake them, and expel them from wherever they have expelled you….” 2:191
What do the clerics say?
· Ayatollah Khomeini: “Islam says: Kill all of the kafirs. Put them to the sword. Cut them in pieces. Islam is a religion of blood for the infidels.”
· Haj Amin al Husseini: “Slaughter Jews wherever you find them. Murder the Jews! Murder them all!”
· Mufti M Hussein: “Islam’s goal is to kill Jews.”
· Al-Aqsa TV: “Allah, strike the Christians… count them and kill them to the last one.”
· Prayer on Mecca loudspeaker: “O Allah vanquish the unjust Christians and the criminal Jews, … end their lives in humiliation and oppression…”
Forced conversion
The Koran commands muslims to force kafirs to convert on pain of death:
· “Kill the non-muslims wherever you find them. ….but if they should repent, establish prayer, and give zakat, let them [go] on their way.” 9:5
· “Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture — [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.” 9:29
· Ali Gomaa, Grand Mufti of Egypt: “Muslims must kill kafirs wherever they are unless they convert to Islam.”
· Abu Askar: “Convert or be killed.”
· Ibn Khaldun: “…a religious duty to convert everybody by persuasion or by force.”
· Osama bin Laden: “Does Islam or does it not force people by the power of the sword to submit…? Yes!”
· Abu Qaqa, of Boko Haram: “…all Christians must convert to Islam. Allah has tasked all Muslims in Quran 9:29 to continue to attack Jews and Christians who refuse to believe in him and his messenger, Prophet Mohammed.”
· Al Baghdadi: “Conversion to Islam or death.”
Terror
Mohammed is recorded as saying: “I have been made victorious with terror.”
The Koran commands muslims:
“Terrorise them!” 8:60
What do muslims say?
· Ragab Hilal Hamida MP: “The Quran directly commands us to commit terrorism…”
· Gen. S. K. Malik: “…to strike terror into the hearts of the enemies”.
· Abu Izzadeen: “Terrorism is part of Islam!”
· Nassim ben Iman: “Every Muslim is a potential terrorist.”
· Zakir Naik: “Every Muslim is a terrorist.”
· Islamic State manual: “The Management of Savagery”.
· Child with dagger, singing: “Our terrorism is blessed, a divine call”.
Impose Islamic rules on all mankind
The Koran commands muslims to “fight” — that is, slaughter — non-muslims until all the “deen” — the governance — is Islam, namely Sharia law. The Arabic word “deen” is normally and artfully translated “religion”, but that is inadequate. In the West, quite unlike in Islam, religion is understood to be restricted to private conscience: it is not government. In Islam from Mohammed’s time to the present there is no distinction between religion and governance: religion is government. The mosque is an arm of the state: “Separation of religion and state is not an option for Muslims.” Dr. Ja’far Sheikh Idris, Sudanese Muslim Philosopher
The Koran’s instruction is at 8:39:
Fight the kafirs until the “deen” [governance], all of it, is Islam.
What do Islamic clerics say?
Musa Cerantonio, Australia “The answer is, as the Prophet said, to fight the infidels until the religion belongs to Allah.” Jihad Watch, December 2012
What is the conclusion to draw about the “interpretation” assertion? It is a red herring, and a dishonest one at that.
Lt-Col Allen West sums it up succinctly: “They are doing exactly what this book says.”
For previous essays by Michael Copeland, see the Michael Copeland Archives.
==END
Turkey sends Mujaheddin warriors against Greece.
Low IQs, including most Feminists, Leftists, Globalists, Europhiles, call the invasion ‘a migrant crisis’.
For the hard of thinking:
-100.000 Moslems, 99% appear to be young Moslem men
-They are not from Syria, but from the Moslem world at large
-Erdogan, Sultan of the Turkish Khanate, has stated that he has sent a Moslem army (the supposed refugees from Syria), to cause the downfall of Europe
-These assault forces are supported by, and probably even armed by, the Turkish military
Erdogan publicly announces an invasion of Europe. He states this is Islam’s ‘Last Army’, meaning the Moslem horde which will bring down civilisation and herald the ‘end of times’, as given in Mein Koran. The World yawns. NATO supine and stupid, does nothing. Euro-left-tards denounce Greece.
00:00 “This storm that is breaking out is the Turkish horde, my Lord!
00:06 The horde that will die for your sake, O Lord!
00:10 Until the glory of your name rises with the call to prayer
00:15 Win the victory because this is Islam’s last army.”
00:20 [Cheers]
00:26 Yes, this storm that breaks is our army.
00:32 Allah stands behind it along with the prayers of millions of our friends.
00:39 This storm is the heart of our nation. Everyone sees or will see what it is capable of.
“Turkey has deployed 1,000 special forces police to its border with Greece to ensure that the migrants it has released don’t return to Turkey. Meanwhile, the Turkish army is reportedly helping the people-smugglers get the migrants to Europe, making sure they don’t overcharge their customers.”
Vast majority of the invaders are from Afghanistan.
Countries of origin of the 252 migrants and refugees detained in Greece so far, per Greek govt:
Afghanistan: 64%
Pakistan: 19%
Turkey: 5%
Syria: 4%
Somalia: 2.6%
Iraq, Iran, Ethiopia, Morocco, Bangladesh, Egypt: 5.4%
As a Catholic, one gets tired (if one’s IQ is over 60); of listening to sermons, appeals and other junk-propaganda from Left-wing Liberal ‘Priests’, vomiting out the satanic spew issued by the Vatican, embracing inter-alia; globaloneywarming, climate-geddon; Muhammadans-are-our-friends; unfettered immigration is mandatory; Christ was a migrant; and of course anti-semiticism disguised as it always is, by criticising ‘Israel’ and its ‘treatment of Palestinians’ (a people which do not exist), including supposedly, Palestinian Christians.
The latest anti-Jew appeal is for this Lenten season, to support something called the ‘Holy Land Foundation’, co-chaired in the UK by extreme Liberals, Archbishop Welby of the ridiculous Anglican State Church of England (with Welby mentally deficient and physically laughable); and Vincent Nichols, apparently a Catholic Archbishop who is not too bright if his friends extend to someone as ridiculous as Welby.
The tenor of the sermon-appeal in our Church was nauseating. According to the Priest who had visited Israel the 18 foot-high wall (it is 26 feet high in reality), was a monument of pain and anguish, separating Christian ‘Palestinians’ from their families, work, farmland and ability to go the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. He called Jewish territory ‘Occupied Territory’. Bethlehem was ‘surrounded’ by the wall, the birth-place of Christ, with the wall a Herodian reminder of Jewish immorality and vanity. Thus, it is the evil Israeli aka the Jew, who is to blame for the poverty, high cost of medicine and lack of jobs in the ‘Occupied Territories’. Ergo, send money as part of your Lenten penance, to the Holy Land Foundation, so we can right the Jew-created wrongs and bring harmony between ‘Palestinians and Jews’.
That such drivel can be stated in a Catholic Church should be roundly condemned. But considering that most of the laity are Liberals divorced from reality, it is probably accepted in toto, as the gospel truth.
No mention was made of why there is a wall. It was built of course as a response to the endless Moslem Jihad against Jews and Israel. Until the mid 1990s the ‘territories’ were run by Israeli military authorities and no wall existed. After Arafat declared an endless intifada all was changed. The ‘West Bank’ became a perennial source of Moslem terror and intifada violence against Jews and Israelis. The Wall exists thanks to Moslem terror.
While Christians living in these areas do suffer from hardship, it is not hard to understand why. Moslems. The Moslem Jihad has forced a complete and utter military-security response from the Israeli state. In fact, there are about 200.000 ‘Palestinian Christians’ in Israel, 51.000 live in the Hamas-PA run territories. It is these 51.000 that are under duress, the rest of the Christians who live elsewhere in Israel are not discriminated against or molested by Israeli security or military policies and personnel. However, the duress of Christians living in the ‘Occupied Territories’ is mostly due to Moslem supremacism and violence (see the links below). There is therefore no context to the claim that Israel is persecuting Christians. 51.000 may indeed suffer in PLO-PA-Hamas dominated territories. But Moslems are arriving in Bethlehem in great numbers, as Christians leave. If the ‘persecution’ is so bad, why are Moslem populations growing and Christians shrinking in these areas?
And yet the Muslim population of Bethlehem is growing. Muslims, in fact, are not fleeing. They are arriving—in large numbers.
Surely there is some significance in this disparity between the two populations. Why is the Muslim sector of Bethlehem growing while the Christian sector is falling? Both face the same exact set of circumstances. Could it be that this disparity tells the true story?
It is important to note, first of all, that Jewish sovereignty does not, ipso facto, lead to Christian emigration. Inside Israel proper, the Christian population has been growing steadily for decades. Today, Christian Arabs are serving in the army and at various levels of the Israeli government.
As far as the decrease of Christians inside the Palestinian territories…..The barrier is indeed a factor, but far more important is the reason that the barrier was built in the first place: rising Islamism inside the Palestinian territories and bad governance on the part of the Palestinian Authority.
It is no coincidence that Bethlehem was mostly Christian until the 1990s. Until then, Bethlehem was ruled directly by Israel through a military administration. Although they were not full citizens of Israel, Palestinian Christians (and Muslims) could travel freely inside the country, visit the beach, and shop in Jewish neighborhoods. That all changed in the mid-1990s when Israel agreed to let the PLO rule parts of the West Bank and Gaza under a famous treaty called the Oslo Accords.
So the ‘Wall’ is there for a reason - Moslems. And because of that fact, checkpoints, searches, and zero tolerance is now Israeli state policy.
It is the Moslems who have turned the ‘territories’ into another hell-hole – terrorism, Jihad, high-unemployment, endless grievances and demands, all flowing into anti-Christian discrimination. But Moslems are never to blame. For the Church and other Liberal hair-flicking multi-culti supporters, Muhammadans are always the victims. The Jews or the Americans are always to blame.
Some reading for Priests, Bishops and the Vatican – the Moslem Persecution of Christians:
Far-Left Guardian calls the Christian Persecution by Moslems in the ME a genocide
Hard-Left Huffington Post calls the Moslem persecution of Christians a genocide
What you will never hear in the Fake News; Fortunate Arabs in Israel (Gatestone)
The UK government’s foreign office report on the persecution of Christians – by Moslems in North Africa and the ME
==END