French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Join Gab (@StFerdinandIII) Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  

Archive - June 2021

Hadith, Jihad, killing children, murdering Infidels

The path of Allah....

Bookmark and Share

The Hadith are explanatory volumes, trying to untangle the rubbish and gibberish one finds in Mein Koran.  They are notations and commentaries designed to clarify the actions and beliefs of Muhammad the war leader, brigand and violent reactionary, named a ‘prophet’ by those who know little about his cult.  As with Mein Koran the Hadith are littered with odes of violence and poetic injustice against Infidels and non-Muslims.  It matters not if you are the pious Atheist (the stuff happens religion), or the earnest face-diapered covered Rona-ist (the 0.3% death rate virus), or the practicing Catholic or indifferent Protestant or Jew.  Your world lies outside that of the Muhammandan cult.  You must repent, submit, obey, convert or be destroyed.


A few Hadith amongst many which promote Jihad and the killing of the Infidel [ape and pig] deemed necessary to appease the Al-Lah (Baal of Mecca).  The pious and Jihadic enough Muslim shall be rewarded with eternal paradise [and virgins, water, wine, nubile boys].


Killing Unbeliever Children is fine:


19:4457 - The Messenger of Allah used not to kill the children, so you should not kill them unless you could distinguish between a child who would grow up to be a believer and a child who would grow up to be a non-believer, so that you killed the prospective non-believer and left the prospective believer alive.


Women and slaves get nothing from Jihad:

19:4458 - Yazid b. Hurmuz asked: Do the woman and the slave get a share of the booty if they participated in Jihad. Ibn Abbas said: You should know that there is nothing of the sort for them except that they will be given a prize.


Muhammad led many military campaigns against the Infidel, setting the prime example for male Muslims to follow:

19:4464 - Abu Ishaq narrated: I met Zaid b. Arqam. I asked him: How many military expeditions did the Messenger of Allah undertake? He said: Nineteen expeditions. I asked him: On how many expeditions did you accompany him? He said: On seventeen expeditions.


Allah expects that you do 'battle':

19:4466 - Jabir b. Abdullah said: I fought in the company of the Messenger of Allah in nineteen battles. I did not participate in the Battle of Badr and the Battle of Uhud. My father prevented me as my age was tender. After 'Abdullah (my father) was killed on the Day of Uhud, I never lagged behind the Messenger of Allah and joined every battle he fought.


Only Moslems can fight for Muhammad:

19:4472 - The Messenger of Allah set out for Badr. When he reached Harrat-ul-Wabara a man met him who was known for his valour and courage. The Companions of the Messenger of Allah were pleased to see him. He said: I have come so that I may follow you and get a share from the booty. The Messenger of Allah said to him: Do you believe in Allah and His Apostle? He said: No. The Messenger of Allah said: Go back, I will not seek help from a Mushrik (idol worshipper). The man returned and overtook him at Baida'? The Messenger asked him as he had asked previously: Do you believe in Allah and His Apostle? The man said: Yes. The Messenger of Allah said to him: Then come along with us.


Jihad for the sake of Allah and Muhammad is holy:

SB 1:35 -The Prophet said, 'The person who participates in Holy battles for Allah's cause and nothing compels him to do so except belief in Allah and His Apostles, will be recompensed by Allah either with a reward, or booty (if he survives) or will be admitted to Paradise (if he is killed in the battle as a martyr). For Jihad I would have loved to be martyred in Allah's cause and then made alive, and then martyred and then made alive, and then again martyred in His cause.'



Given the general ignorance of the self-imploding ‘Western civilisation’, these and other examples of Muslim intolerance are primed and re-painted as sonnets of love and tolerance and embraced by the unwashed and illiterate as truisms of the same. 

Henri Pirenne: Mohammed and Charlemagne. A thesis which offends modern ahistorical revisionism.

The 'academic' animus against Christianity does not render history or truth.

Bookmark and Share


Pirenne was an early 20th century Belgian historian whose works include a History of Europe.  An academic of renown and importance, he was interred as a prisoner of war during World War I in Germany.  During his time in captivity, he worked on his History of Europe continuing a work of historical art which spanned 35 years.  From this effort  one of the most important histories of the 20th century, ‘Mohammed and Charlemagne’ was born.  It offends almost all of ‘academia’ today, so by default it is likely to be entirely correct.  You can hardly read a kind word about Pirenne in modern day ahistorical revisionism, much of anti-Christian, in modern ‘academia’.  Pirenne’s ideas conform to common sense, which deeply antagonises the ‘academies’ and Muslimophiles which saturate modern day universities and institutes, many of them happy recipients of Muslim organisational money and donations.  Pirenne’s thesis, based on records, artefacts, trade data and coinage is that the Muslim irruption in the 7th century, combined with Viking attacks in the following centuries (much of it generated by the White slave trade with Muslims); contracted the European socio-economic landscape leading to eras of great, violent and turbulent change and at times contraction, followed by innovation and improvement.  No knees are bent by Muslims or ancestors of Vikings for the millions of White slaves taken between 640 AD and 1000 AD. 


According to modern ‘and the 'orthodox' theory of historical development parlayed by the great minds at Western universities and research centres, the Muslims were far more advanced than the cowering, dirty midgets of Europe circa 640 AD. Only Muslim enlightenment saved Europe from a permanent Dark Age. The Muslims were not only responsible with saving Greek and Roman literature, culture and societal innovations, but imparted these onto the backward Europeans through such venues as the Muslim city of Cordoba in Spain, or the interaction of Muslims in Baghdad with the theocratic and darkly superstitious Christian fanatics in Constantinople. According to this 'accepted' view Islam was a force for good, transferring the ideas of civilization from the East to the backwards West and ensuring that Europeans did not revert back to Cro-Magnon times. We should all be thankful then for the advance of Islam.


This modern view of the early Christian medieval period is significant in its mendacity and loathing of Christianity.  Even Bernard Lewis the so-named 'Sage of the West' in ‘On the West and Islam’, forwards the illusion that the Muslims were advanced and the Christians in Europe and North Africa backwards. Reality and archaeological evidence, as forwarded by Pirenne make this theory a laughingstock. The Fall of Rome as most serious students of the subject will know, was a benefit for much of Europe. Long before 476 AD Rome had ceased to be of much use. It had become just another oriental despotism, with high taxes, a far ranging and corrupt bureaucracy and endless civil and internecine warfare which destroyed wealth and the lives of generations. By 476 AD Rome was already managed by Germanic chieftains and the ending of the reign of the last Emperor Romulus, by the Teutonic Chief of Staff Odoacer – done at the behest of the Eastern Empire – was not a crash heard round the world, but a mere formality in which the Germans formally took over the empire they had so long dominated.  Christian Europe fused together Roman, Greek and Christian ideals to deal with the end of Empire, the change of ownership and the withdrawal of debased Roman coinage from its European wide military occupation, in which the army was a significant attraction of investment and trade.  It was not an easy transition, but without the Church, Europe would have indeed been splintered far worse, and far deeper, and would have succumbed in-toto, to the Muslim invasion of the 7th century.  It would have become Islamic, an idea that undoubtedly sends modern ‘historians’ into epileptic fits of visionary delight.


In over 150 well sourced and detailed pages Pirenne’s elucidates his case that the Arab attacks on Europe including their takeover of Sicily, Spain by 650 AD, and the relentless piracy and littoral invasions which lasted from 650 to about 950 AD was responsible for the demise of what was then a vibrant set of civilizations [when the Spanish Reconquista really got underway though the Spanish Christians did stop the complete takeover of Spain with their victory at Covadonga in 720 AD].


The 3 'lost centuries' were basically a dark age caused by the siege of Europe initiated by the Muslims. We know this to be true because the Eastern Roman empire of Byzantium suffered a similar fate. The Byzantine empire became a lot poorer, less educated and suffered economic and population contraction during the exact same period as the 'Dark Ages' took hold in the West.  Byzantium contracted until the 10th century, when through an economic and related military renewal, it fought back against the Muslims from the south and east, and the pagans from the north, and entered a period of nominal prosperity, until its armies were shattered in 1071 by the Seljuk Muslims at Manzikert.  Byzantium never fully recovered from this defeat and was consumed by the Ottoman Turks in steps until the great city and last remaining outpost was digested in 1453. 


Pirenne's archaeological proof makes another key point. Post 476 AD the former Roman state in Gaul, Spain, Italy and North Africa flourished. The Gallo-Roman elite essentially carried on the Roman empire's institutions, trade, road building, colossi construction, and culture. Nothing changed. In fact, as Pirenne proves, the new states became wealthier. Without the dead hand of the Roman-Oriental state, the new powers were able to increase trade, reduce taxes and improve productivity. Archeological evidence makes it clear that from 500-650 AD the former Western empire was far wealthier, more integrated, and more cultured than at any time in its history. The Gallic dynasty of the Merovingians for example, were literally covering their public buildings in part with silver, gold and gaudy emblems of wealth. Western Europe was no poor backwater when the Arabs invaded the European-Gallo Vandal empire of western North Africa in 635 AD. It was rich, sophisticated, and elaborate.


Real world facts make this obvious.


Why then did Europe decline from 650 to about 950 AD? The main reason is the most obvious. The Arab conquests sealed off the Mediterranean Sea and cut North Africa off from Europe. Eastern trade so vital to the wealth of Europe and so necessary for its intellectual, material and even cultural development was severed. So too was papyrus. For 1000 years the Egyptian supply of paper was an extraordinarily key aspect of Euro-Romano development. When this supply was ended circa 640 AD, the Europeans had to turn to the inferior use of cowhides or parchment. This made writing, record keeping and literacy far more difficult to sustain.


The Arabs and Muslims far from being peaceful, civilized and nuanced progressives – as forwarded by Lewis and the orthodox academic community – engaged in a 400-year concerted attack upon the European coastal areas. After conquering Spain and Sicily the Arabs tried to conquer France [failing in 732 AD at the Battle of Tours], and engaged in endless littoral piracy, literally annihilating Christian shipping and port activity. Many European ports became emptied first of ships, then of goods and people. As trade declined the entire economy suffered. Even the coinage of money became difficult, and gold and silver coins were replaced by cheaper bronze units.


When the Christians ended the Muslim siege starting in about the mid-10th century their economy, wealth and spirits recovered. It led directly to the aid of the Eastern Empire and the creation of the Crusades. After 400 years of Arab aggression the Christians had recovered enough strength to counterattack and end Islamic hegemony of the crucial Mediterranean sea.


These are common sensical, black and white facts, supported by archaeology, contemporary accounts, and comprehensive research. Pirenne is entirely right. The 'Fall of Rome' was not a catastrophe but in many ways a positive development. Europe went into a 3-century decline thanks to the Arabs. This, however, offends the current zeitgeist that the Arabs and Muslims created the modern world. This fallacy is deep rooted in Western culture and academia. The reality is that the Arabs and Muslims created and still create destruction, death and anti-civilizational practices and attitudes.


This is why Pirenne is condemned by the modern historian-community. He was right. They are wrong. And the little academic minds will unite to crucify those who dare to speak the truth.  Not much has changed since the days of Ptolemy.

Sura 2 and the Muslim cult of slavery

Why don't Muslims bend knees to Christians, Blacks and non-Muslims?

Bookmark and Share



Sura 2 is the longest Sura in Mohammed's totalitarian charter named compassionately, 'Recital'. Recite, memorize, obey.  Most importantly for Muslims, obey Muhammad.  This is the foundation stone for the Muslim cult.  Sura 2 discusses at length, ‘slavery’.  Slavery is not only accepted in Mein Koran, but applauded, supported, and encouraged.  Enslavement of non-Muslims is a part of Jihad and can take many forms, including sex-slavery of Infidel women, slaves captured in war, or conquered populations supporting their Muslim masters through Jizya and the tax system, where male Muslims are not required to work.


The greatest Black-slave traders in history were of course Muslims.  Sura 2 provides the compelling motivations as to why.  50 million or more Black Africans were shipped into Muslim-Arab heartlands as workers, sex-slaves, eunuchs or future soldiers.  No Black culture exists in Muslims states.  25 million Whites were enslaved, worked to death, or used as soldiers and sex-workers.  Mongolian and Muslim ‘Tartars’, Ottomans, various Arab Caliphates in the Levant, North Africa and Spain; all traded in white-slavery.  No knees are bended by Muslims to Blacks and Whites of course.  Only the White man must kneel.


Sura 2 makes it clear that ‘good’ Moslems should accept the existence of being a 'slave', as well as ‘owning’ Infidel slaves.  Slavery as a theme in Muhammad’s cult has 2 main threads.  The first, is that a Muslim is a slave of Muhammad and the moon-idol of Mecca Baal, or Al-Lah (the Lord).  The second, is that owning slaves is a right inherent in Muslim supremacism.  Muhammad owned 20 or so sex-slaves as well as Black slaves.  He did free one Black slave (one of his earliest converts), but only if he joined his movement.  A key motivation for the Muslim Jihad was slave ownership either for sexual gratification, or for labour and military conscription.  It is estimated that just from the Balkans over 300 years, about 2 million Christian boys (slaves) were ‘converted’ starting at the age of 7, to serve in the Muslim armies as ‘Janissaries’, the most feared legions of Ottoman soldiers.  Apparently modern-day Turks are not bending knees to those non-Muslims living in Balkan nations today.


The use of the nouns ‘slave’ or ‘slaves’, runs throughout the width and breadth of the Koran. There are about 420 pages in the Koran. The word 'slaves' appears on 226 of them. The word 'slave' singular, makes a guest appearance on 109 pages. Together 'slave' and 'slaves' are found in 335 pages or about 80% of the Koran. At the verse level these terms comprise 5% of the verses out the Koranic total of 6236. It does appear that this Al-Lah thing, idol, Hub'al, Muhammad, is rather preoccupied with supine submission. Witness the ravings in Sura 2 about slaves usually married with violence against the hated Unbelievers:



How bad is that for which they have sold their ownselves, that they should disbelieve in that which Allah has revealed (the Qur'an), grudging that Allah should reveal of His Grace unto whom He will of His slaves. So they have drawn on themselves wrath upon wrath. And for the disbelievers, there is disgracing torment.


And when My slaves ask you (O Muhammad SAW) concerning Me, then (answer them), I am indeed near (to them by My Knowledge). I respond to the invocations of the supplicant when he calls on Me (without any mediator or intercessor). So let them obey Me and believe in Me, so that they may be led aright.


And of mankind is he who would sell himself, seeking the Pleasure of Allah. And Allah is full of Kindness to (His) slaves.


Muhammad is referenced as the most important slave of the Al-Lah, with the usual and rather ridiculous refrain 'peace be upon him', whenever his hallowed name is invoked. This for a man who slaughtered, butchered, murdered, slave-traded, erected so to speak a large personal harem, and died fat and covered in gold, poisoned or strangled [or both] by his own men. See Sura 2:23. Sura 2:221 makes the startling revelation that being a slave of Muhammad or Al-Lah, is preferable to being a disbelieving free-man.




And if you (Arab pagans, Jews, and Christians) are in doubt concerning that which We have sent down (i.e. the Qur'an) to Our slave (Muhammad Peace be upon him), then produce a Surah (chapter) of the like thereof and call your witnesses (supporters and helpers) besides Allah, if you are truthful.



And do not marry Al-Mushrikat (idolatresses, etc.) till they believe (worship Allah Alone). And indeed a slave woman who believes is better than a (free) Mushrikah (idolatress, etc.), even though she pleases you. And give not (your daughters) in marriage to Al-Mushrikun till they believe (in Allah Alone) and verily, a believing slave is better than a (free) Mushrik (idolater, etc.), even though he pleases you. Those (Al-Mushrikun) invite you to the Fire, but Allah invites (you) to Paradise and Forgiveness by His Leave, and makes His Ayat (proofs, evidences, verses, lessons, signs, revelations, etc.) clear to mankind that they may remember.


Slavery is the new freedom in the Koran. Free yourself by submitting to Al-Lah and Muhammad and do not question what the Koran states.  All the blessings of the Meccan moon deity will be bestowed upon your person in the male-Moslem heaven, with eternal delights to occupy your time. The Koran has nothing to say about what female Moslem 'slaves' will get from the Al-lah idol, Baal.


To be fair in 2:177 there is reference made to freeing slaves – as long as they join the cult of course. One of Muhammad's first converts was his personal black slave. Islam is famously racist, with those entering hell possessing 'black faces' and Kaffir originally designating a black slave – one of the lowliest life forms in the Moslem hierarchy. Free your slaves to join the cult of Al-Lah, and your 'Lord' will be pleased, as long as you know that you must fight for him or it:




It is not Al-Birr (piety, righteousness, and each and every act of obedience to Allah, etc.) that you turn your faces towards east and (or) west (in prayers); but Al-Birr is (the quality of) the one who believes in Allah, the Last Day, the Angels, the Book, the Prophets and gives his wealth, in spite of love for it, to the kinsfolk, to the orphans, and to Al-Masakin (the poor), and to the wayfarer, and to those who ask, and to set slaves free, performs As-Salat (Iqamat-as-Salat), and gives the Zakat, and who fulfill their covenant when they make it, and who are As-Sabirin (the patient ones, etc.) in extreme poverty and ailment (disease) and at the time of fighting (during the battles). Such are the people of the truth and they are Al-Muttaqun (pious - see V.2:2).


In Moslem jurisprudence the Koranic 'legal' ideal of an eye for an eye, is usually followed and believed by the more pious. If you commit a crime against a Moslem's slave than he has a right to commit a similar action against your slave. This 'Law of equality in punishment' is a pre-iron age code, which historically can be traced to neo-Babylonian times of 1700 B.C. It is crude and not a program of jurisprudence but one of simplistic reciprocation. Today of course the relativists accept this rather banal code as an alternative form of 'justice' embedded in the various implementation of Sharia or Koranic 'law'.




O you who believe! Al-Qisas (the Law of Equality in punishment) is prescribed for you in case of murder: the free for the free, the slave for the slave, and the female for the female. But if the killer is forgiven by the brother (or the relatives, etc.) of the killed against blood money, then adhering to it with fairness and payment of the blood money, to the heir should be made in fairness. This is an alleviation and a mercy from your Lord. So after this whoever transgresses the limits (i.e. kills the killer after taking the blood money), he shall have a painful torment.


Slavery was and is rife within Islam. The Islamic irruptions were in large measure the attack on sophisticated civilizations by barbarous desert peoples seeking wealth, booty, women and manufactured products. Slavery is accepted as a de-facto part of existence within Islam. Curious then, that a cult focused on pre-modern slavery and its attendant immorality, is deemed to be a religion.


Denying the Muslim Umma’s goal to rule the Globe is suicidal, not tolerant.

Islamophobia is not the problem. We need more, not less of it.

Bookmark and Share



Cultural Marxists, a category whose members include most of the political elite, academia and the media, often descry and rage with populist affectation against 'Islamophobia'. Cultural Marxists moralize that being offended by a pagan Arab fascism, one dedicated to submitting the individual into a collective communal in which the church and state are permanently commingled, is somehow an act of irrationality, almost racist in its scope, and unsophisticated in its approach. As with all matters to do with Cultural Marxism the opposite is of course true. What the vendors of cultural destruction are trying to sell you is the inversion of reality.


'Islamophobia' is another juvenile mindless label. We need more Islamophobes not less. We need more people who are educated about the real Islam, and the real nature of 'Jihad', not less. We need more realism in identifying the pagan fascist reality of a political theology centred around the racist Koran, founded by an Arab military adventurer who went mad at age 40, deifying the male moon deity of Mecca. Can there be anything more absurd than stating that a program of mindless ritualization, prayer, prostration, irrationality, and following laws emanating from a book which is worse than Mein Kampf, is a religion? Cultural Marxists are ignorant. It is plainly insipid to criticize someone who understands and resists the evils of Islam.


As with most destructive cultural changes and posturing, the Marxist uses slander, accusing those who defend traditions, Western superiority, or the modern world with calumnies and distortions.  The cultural Marxist cults abound and are intent at dismantling Western civilisation.

§  Abortion, which is simply the killing of a human, turned into a 'female right to choose'. How kind.

§  Globaloney Warming fearmongering is now defined as a 'science'.

§  Trans-Queer coupling and culture is now decanted as normal, even superior, in spite of psychological evidence, treatment and studies to the contrary.

§  White Misandry or hatred of Whites, premised on ‘slavery’, is promoted as mandatory ignoring White slavery by Black, Arab, Turkish and Mongolian Muslims numbering at least 25 million and the fact that only White Christians have fought wars to end slavery (no other culture or race in history has done this and Blacks and Muslims still own today, 5 million Black African slaves).

§  Defaming Christianity and inventing lies about the theology which formed the modern world is repurposed as being progressive and 'secular'.

§  Slandering capitalism and industry is now 'defending the poor and the minorities'.

§  Those who protest against illegal immigration which destroys native White societies, culture and heritage, are racists, against all immigration and in need of re-education.

§  If you object to stabbing people with experimental drugs to counter a 0.3% death rate flu, you are anti-science, a risk, a domestic terrorist and should be denied access to a normal life.


Islamophobia is thus a word like ‘racism’, which the Cultural Marxists will use to beat down anyone who opposes a fascist pagan moon cult from Mecca, responsible for some 300 million dead over 1400 years and the conquering via the sword, which still goes on today, of huge tracts of the planet. So how intelligent are these Cultural Marxists?


Anyone who uses Islamophobia is plainly a simpleton.


First, most of the people against the theocratic fascism called 'submission', are not against individual Muslims. We know from Nazi records that only 2 million Germans were part of the official Nazi party. In Russia, the Communist party numbered no more than 8 million. This would indicate that superficially at least, most Germans and most Russians were not deployed inside non-Western organizations dedicated to the destruction of the modern world. Most likely, most citizens of Nazi Germany were not interested in Germanic race theory, nor in universalist ambition and supremacy. Same for the Russians of the Cold War. But that is immaterial. The cults which ruled these states, and their liturgy, philosophies, ideals and beliefs, certainly were interested in universal rule, and destroying the reality of the 5 senses. Islam is no different.


Second, no one knows if the individual Muslim is a great and good person, or someone sending money to Hamas and reading Qutb. You don't know. And if you don't know, it is highly specious to be lecturing people that all Muslims are moderate peace-loving democrats. Reality and facts are against you. The Saudi's have spent some $100 billion in the past 40 years promoting Salafist-Islamic fascism around the world. Huge mosques have been and will continue to be erected in every major Western city and urban area. The Koran does not preach love and hope, but intolerance, conquest and war. Read it.


Cultural Marxists loathe Christianity. But they esteem and love Islam. Why is that? How can someone debauch aspects of Christianity, which bequeathed the Golden Rule, the Book of Matthew, higher ethics, peace as a virtue, immanent universal generalist love, and which amongst other higher callings helped end slavery a practice still on-going within Islam, sanctioned by the Koran? How can any person who is sane and who can see reality possibly have an animus against the Christian philosophy of faith through reason, but support an irrational, illiterate and supremacist liturgy like Islam? You must be dumb.


And as the cult of Corona has revealed, at least half of society is brain-dead.


Muslim Brotherhood documents discovered in the 1990s are very clear. The Muslim elite, or a cadre within it, certainly desires the replacing of the European and North American systems of government and freedom, with Caliphate rule, based on 7th century premised Sharia barbarism. Pagan Fascisms, as expressed in the cult of Muhammad and his followers, are not known to be progenitors of tolerance, rationality, freedom, or to facilitate a division of church and state - supposedly a very important concern for the Cultural Marxist Brown Shirts.


We can be sure of one thing of course. As with Gender fascism, Abortion, Globaloney-Warming, Socialism, and state control, the Cultural Marxists and their media friends will try to change the nature of the debate from what Islam is, to one of name-calling. If you oppose Globaloney Warming, you are a holocaust denier. If you think Abortion is bad, you hate women. If you oppose unfettered illegal immigration you are a racist.....and if you fight against an Arabian moon cult and fascist theocracy, you are an 'Islamophobe'!  Denying reality is what Cultural Marxists do.


The Islamic Moon Cult; a 3000 year old paganism

Hitler, Stalin, Mohammed - fascist brothers in arms

Bookmark and Share


The ‘Islam is a religion’ scam is getting old and boring.

 It would be much more exciting to discover the pagan, cultish roots of the ideology to better understand how to turn normal people into raving, bloodthirsty, anti-Jew, anti-modern, anti-Christian Jihadists.  Akin to the ‘experts’ and ‘social scientists’ during the 1930s who desperately attempted to convince their fellow knaves that Hitler’s National Socialism was in the vanguard of protecting Christianity from the barbarous Bolsheviks, or the media agents who swooned over Stalin’s Communist Russia proclaiming it a ‘brave new world’ and were a-twitter over Soviet ‘efficiency’ and ‘full production’; so today we have the same rain dance going on with so-called ‘Professors’ or ‘Researchers’ about the Meccan moon cult.  Daily the elite intones dramatically that, ‘Islam is a religion’, ‘Islam means peace’, or that ‘Islam is tolerant’. You might as well say that the moon is made of cheese; aliens are flying around in little cigar ships; and the United Nations is a useful group. None of the proclamations made about Islam in-toto, as a cult, as a movement, divorced from the individual, makes any sense, or have any factual basis.


Even a semi-illiterate kaffir like myself can see the similarities between the pagan fascisms of Hitler’s cult, the Leninist-Stalinist cult, and the Islamic moon-cult. You can make a list of the primary elements within all 3 fascisms and they match perfectly. Check, check, check. You would think that some hot-shot media personality would spend a little time doing some primary research on the biggest civilisational threat to our continued existence since the rise of Marxist-fascism, or the recent Medical Fascism of Rona. Apparently reading and research, much like during the 1930s, is not in vogue. Politically correct double-speak, Orwellian platitudes and ‘feelings’ are more important. But in the real world going down a check list of fascism makes it apparent that Islam is another pagan, fascist cult with a death wish.


You can start with Hitler and the Nazi’s. Go through the check list: supreme leader, propaganda as reality, hatred of the West, hatred of modernity, world domination, economic autarky, hatred of Jews and Christians (Christ and Paul were Jews), party control, party dominated state functions, societal militarization, control of education, sports and social activities.


Then move on to Uncle Joe Stalin and those wonderful democratic Russian communists [sniff; Russians loved their children too, according to Sting]. Go through that check list. supreme leader, propaganda as reality, hatred of the West, hatred of modernity, world domination, economic autarky, hatred of Jews and Christians (thousands of Churches were pulled down, worship was outlawed), party control, party dominated state functions, societal militarization, control of education, sports and social activities. Looks like Uncle Adolf and Uncle Joe had constructed similar barbarisms.


Now move on to the Moon Cult of Islam.


Supreme leader? Each Moslem state has one and the ultimate is Mohammed a so-called ‘prophet’. See Iran for details or practicing Muslims anywhere in the world who swear an oath to their Imam and their prophet and could really care less what nation state they are residing in.


Propaganda as reality? Moslems are expert at lying and distorting. God in the Muslim sense for example, has nothing in common with the Christian god, since Islam is based on the Allah moon cult of pagan Arabia. Moslems will temporize across history and time to justify mass acts of outlandish savagery.


Hatred of the West? Most certainly. Hatred of modernity? Who needs the modern world when the pagan Arab culture of the 7th century and its Bronze age inspired social construction was the apogee of development.


World domination? Islam means submission and the entire ethos is devoted to establishing a world-wide caliphate. Like Nazism and Stalinism it is a universal ideology. See the Koran for details.


Economic autarky? Outside of oil Islam engages in little trade and investment with the outside world.


Hatred of Jews and Christians?  Hitler’s Waffen SS didn’t invent the idea of having Jews dig their own graves before shooting them and kicking them into the dug trench. See Mohammed in 624 AD when he forced 700 Jewish men to dig their own graves before taking 3 days to kill them and dump their corpses into the trenches. Mein Koran contains 1500 plus verses of hate speech against Jews and Christians and adjures Muslims to either convert or kill both. 


Party control? A clerical elite runs Islamic nations and establishes transnational duties and ideological observations. Both the Shias and Sunnis have their own centres of power and control and elite ideological, hierarchical structures.


Party dominated state functions? Terror groups, Islamic governments and radicals all dominate social structures [see Hizbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Palestine and remember that the Nazi’s used charities as well to give them power over social processes]. The elite via various party and religious structures dominate all relevant state and social functions.


Societal militarization? Jihad is a duty and any reason can be used to justify terror or war [America, the Jews, land, the Crusades, my bad mood etc.], is used to enlist and recruit angry young men and women into the global jihad program.


Control of education, sports and social activities? The indoctrination of youth, and minds via propaganda and education is something to behold. See Communist Russia for more details.


The pagan cults of Hitler, Stalin and Mohammed nicely align with each other. But don’t Moslems pray? Chant? Help each other? Raise families? Love nature? Perhaps but so what. All Moslems regardless of nationality must obey doctrine in Arabic including prayers, and reading the Koran, [or chanting at the local town’s anti-Jew, anti-Christian 5-minute hate scream embedded in the Shahadah for example]. It is rather strange that the entire Muslim world follows an Arab language; an Arab moon cult; and Arab traditions of submission.


Muslims the world over must support, unequivocally, a 3000-year-old Arab moon cult. Mohammed and his brigands made sure that all Muslims would need to journey to Mecca to show their undying devotion to the Arab ideal; follow the Arab written Koran to the letter with nary a change over 800 years to its text; consult the Arab written Hadiths which interpret aspects of the Koran that are vague, [say for instance about raping a 9 year old and having sex with 8 year olds, this is admissible according to the Hadiths if certain obligations are met such as marriage for the weekend, or the child was disrespectful to a man etc.]; or perform the pagan rituals that all Arabs over 3000 years performed.


The rituals should be a dead give-away that we have a cult on our hands. Without delving into the gibberish and nonsense of the Koran and Islamic ideology, one can just view the following Arab pagan rituals that Muslims must perform on their Hejaz or pilgrimage and probably see that all is not mentally well with the moon cult;


o   Pilgrimage to Mecca and circling the Kabah 7 times: Each local tribe of Arab pagans walked 7 times around their own Kabah that housed their own black stone. Muslims circle the Kabah, claiming that Abraham did such.


o   Kissing the black stone: Each local tribe of Arab pagans kissed their own tribal black stones. Muslims kiss the Kabah black stone believing it was a divine meteorite which fell at Adam’s feet and was rediscovered by Abraham. Mohammed linked it with Allah in place of Abraham.


o   The stone throw at Mina: There was a wide spread custom among pagan Arabs to throw rocks at little devils. Muslims claim the custom was started by Abraham when he threw stones at the devil.


o   ‘The Run’ between the holy places of Safa and Marwa: Arab pagans ran between two holy idols, Isaf and Na’ila as a form of penance. Muslims perform the same running but redefine the meaning to be Hagar [wife of Abraham] running between two hills, looking for water for Ishmael [the progenitor of Islam]. The hills or pagan idols are transformed to represent holy sites.


o   The Praise after the Pilgrimage to Mecca: Arabian pagans praised their dead ancestors after pilgrimages to their place of death. Muslims perform the same but redirect the praise to Allah after the ‘hijaz’ or pilgrimage to Mecca.


o  Little devils: Like the pagan Arabs before them, Muslims also believe in jinn or little devils which torture mankind.


Similar to Hitler’s pagan cult or the Soviet Communist cult, Islamic ideology is based upon pagan rituals and repetition (in Arabic of course). The fact is that Islam is a pagan cult based on a 3000-year-old Arabian moon cult, named Hu’Baal or Baal from the Old Testament, who was the Lord of Mecca and Muhammad’s family were his caretakers. Islam is nothing more than an extension of pagan Arabian power, premised on Baal worship. It is rather remarkable that non-Arabs have fallen so easily for what is obviously an ideology of power and control, aligned to a pagan construct of moon worship. It is odd as well that the Western elite and media for the most part, choose to ignore its fascist-pagan roots and program and choose to embrace the mistaken notion that Moslems want peace and love.


Nothing in the 1400-year Muslim jihad, nor in the present manifestation of its modern fascism, indicates that Islam is an ideology of peace and love. Much evidence presents the opposite. It is rather curious then that we are so blatantly apathetic about it all.


Hitler, Stalin, and Mohammed – fascist brothers in arms.