Moslem fascism embedded in its liturgical books, demands the absolute destruction of Jews and Christians. If you read Muhammadan theology for yourself, separated from lame-brain media brainwashing, and public school disinformation; this fact will make itself present in a most sickening and virulent manner. Consider some of the 'commentaries' or Hadiths, which run alongside Mein Koran, by Moslem 'theologians' [ie cult propagandists], such as Ishaq and Tabari.

Ishaq was an early 8^th century propagandist for the Abbasid totalitarianism, named by some as a 'Caliphate'. He wrote the first biography of Fuehrer Muhammad, who in the eyes of the moon deity Allah, was the man uber-alles. Born some 75 years or so after the mad-man's death, Ishaq put together accounts of Muhammad's actions during his reign of terror, from second-hand sources. It makes unpleasant reading.

Ishaq:245	"Do you love Jews and their religion, you liver-hearted ass, and not Muhammad? Their religion will never march with ours.... Jews make false professions about Islam. So Allah sent down: 'Satan wishes to lead them astray."
Ishaq:248	"Allah increases their sickness. A tormented doom awaits the Jews. Allah said, 'They are mischief makers. They are fools. The Jews deny the truth and contradict what the Apostle has brought. I will mock them and let them continue to wander blindly.'"

Tabari, applauded by big-brains as the 'most important Moslem historian ever', was a mid-9^th century Moslem who extended the Hadith commentaries. As Shakespeare was a Tudor propagandist, so too was Tabari a product of his times and his 'history' is nothing less than a fictional recitation of Moslem supremacy [much of Shakespeare should be viewed in the same vein].

Below are some verses from Ishaq and Tabari related to the Jews as viewed by Moslems and Muhammad. Notice the bile, the hate, the intolerance, the lust for their destruction.

Next we will hear that Nazi theological apologist Rosenberg, was 'a great historian'.

Much more exists in the 'histories' of Tabari and Ishaq related to hate speech, Jihad, and the murdering of Jews and Christians. At least we can thank them for their frank honesty. We can see that Muhammad murdered Jews with military might, trickery, his own hands and slaughtered innocents, whilst raping Jewish women. Moslems and their devoted multi-cult minions characterize such actions as 'religious', 'prophetic', and 'ethical'. What a pathetic group of brain-addled morons they must be. 

Why have Moslems been slaughtering Jews for 1400 years ? Why do Moslems call Jews filthy apes despised [7:166, 2:64], or pigs [5:59] ? Why do Moslem mothers in Gaza and elsewhere dance in delight when Jews are killed by their fascist cult ? Read the Koran. It demands the extirpation of Jews and Christians. From Mein Koran I have listed some of the more lurid anti-Jew verses, culled from a catalogue of 1600 or so hate-speech verses against Jews and Christians. The big-brains and Moselmophiles will call the following 'misunderstood', 'poorly translated', 'taken out of context', 'inflammatory'. They are all morons.

7:166 – “So when they exceeded the limits of what they were prohibited, We said to them: "Be you monkeys, despised and rejected." (It is a severe warning to the mankind that they should not disobey what Allah commands them to do, and be far away from what He prohibits them).”

The below list comprises an example of 25 anti-semitic hate verses. Moslem non-culture is suffused with Jew-hate. So too was Nazism.

“Renaissance of the Twelfth Century” has been called the greatest of all such revivals, in that it marked the greatest progress within the shortest period of time. It was centered especially in the school of Chartres, under the direction of John of Salisbury, a Platonist who loved classical literature. But before long, intellectual life moved in a different direction from the Humanism of Salisbury, who warned that the emphasis on logic would bring about a decline in the study of the liberal arts, by making them seem insufficiently rigorous." [From Hitchcock's 'History of the Catholic Church']

One of the most important Western philosophers, and unfortunately one who is rarely studied is Anselm of Canterbury. Anselm lived from 1033-1109 and is a pre-cursor of the '12^th century Renaissance', which was in part an era of scientific, mathematical, logical and rational innovation. As with all 'revolutions' the antecedents of what causes change and improvement are usually very long indeed. From the 11^th century onwards, indeed from the time of Charlemagne we can see that Church dogma, far from discouraging invention and enquiry, actively promoted it. Anselm's ontological arguments for the existence of God were based on reality, reason as well as faith. All of these concepts were current and percolating throughout the width and breadth of Christendom in the 11^th century. Anselm did not invent his theological philosophy from nothing. Lanfranc and others were merging rationality into Church doctrine.

“Anselm began his education under the tutelage of the monks of a local Benedictine monastery. After his mother passed away, Anselm observed a period of grief and mourning and then travelled throughout Europe. At that time, the spiritual and intellectual reputation of the monk Lanfranc, who belonged to the monastery of Bec in Normandy, was widespread. Anselm was drawn to Lanfranc, and in 1060 attached himself to Lanfranc's abbey. The community immediately recognized Anselm's unique abilities and he was soon teaching in the abbey school. He was made prior of the monastery in 1063.

It was during his days at Bec that Anselm composed his innovativeworks on the existence and nature of God.” Source

It was Anselm who formatted the basis of 'Scholasticism' which in the main married theology with reason, and in particular used logical argumentation to justify Church belief. Pagan Roman and Greek philosophy was actively embraced, amended and used in this dialectical development. Platonism, integrated into Christianity by Augustine in the 5^th century, preceded a similar development for Aristotelian naturalism in the 11^th-13^th centuries.

“Scholastic movement essentially began with Anselm, who pushed the method of logical analysis further than anyone had, up to his time. He defined theology as “faith seeking understanding”, in that the truths of faith can be neither proved nor disproved by human reason, but men are obliged to use reason to understand them as far as possible. Without minimizing the importance of Scripture, reason can venture where Scripture is either silent or unclear. Anselm especially used rational inquiry in his treatise Why God Became Man, where he tried to understand as far as possible the revealed truth of the Incarnation. Anselm’s argument for the existence of God was based on the idea of a perfect Being, no greater than which can be conceived by the mind. Such a being must exist, he argued, because perfection implies existence.” [Hitchcock's, 'History of the Catholic Church]

Far from being opposed to Greek philosophy, Christianity had always analyzed and accepted certain parts of Greek enquiry as being valid and reasonable. There was no conflict between the two. Platonism comported itself with Christianity with its emphasis on 'forms' versus reality; and on a higher divinity. Aristotelian naturalism was oftentimes scientifically invalid, but its demand to observe and test was accepted as part of human reason and necessary to understand the world of the 5 senses.

“Anselm was the first philosopher to employ the Aristotelian distinction between essence and existence to understand God, essence being that which a thing is (a man), existence the fact that it is (a particular man). In God alone, existence and essence are the same, in that His essence is simply to exist, without limit, whereas creatures exist only in limited ways.”[ibid]

Anselm's writings demarcated the obvious differences between the seen and the unseen. There are limits to both. The essence of a living creature is quite obviously distinct from its physical existence. The mind is not the same as a brain. The soul is not the same as a heart. The spiritual cannot be the same as the physical.

“His predecessors for the most part had assumed without argument the fundamental principle that the God whom they loved and worshipped had real existence. Although Anselm never doubted, he nevertheless wished to satisfy his mind by rational proof that what he already believed was true. "I do not seek to understand in order that I may believe, but I believe in order to understand." While prior at Bec, he wrote his <Monologium>, in which he restated all such logical arguments as he could find in earlier writings to prove that God is. Then, still unsatisfied, he devised an original proof of his own, and explained it in his <Proslogium>. To some of his successors it was convincing, to others not, but these and other of his works gave a great stimulus to fresh, logical thinking and arguing in the theological schools of the period, the movement known as medieval scholasticism.” Source

Notice Anselm writes, 'I do not seek to understand in order that I may believe, but I believe in order to understand'; in other words faith leads to reason. These words were later reordered by Descartes in his own statement that, 'I think therefore I am'. Reason leads to self-awareness. Anselm would have replied, 'I believe therefore I think'. Faith leads to reason and self-awareness. Both paths are valid.

Anselm presages the writings of St. Thomas Aquinas in the 13^th century, the man who Christianized Aristotle. In any event, a truism is that during the 11^th century there is not one single Moslem philosopher or theologian who embarked upon the same program as Anselm. Indeed from the time of Ghazali early in the 11^th century the door to merge reason into the Koran was shut, never to be opened. It guaranteed the poverty and intellectual misery of Islam, a fact on indisputable and bloody display for the past 1000 years.  

Culture is King. Moslem culture is Oriental, Arab and directly opposed to Western civilization – a project with 3.000 years of non-Oriental history. This is why there is a 'clash' between the Meccan cult of submission [named Islam] and the West. Cultural opposites do not merge, interact or engage over the long term; in peaceable exchange. Nothing in the historical record regarding Islam can dispute this fact.

Everything is supposedly 'nuanced' and 'very complicated' unless of course you belong to the bien-pensant club which believes that fish-walked; trace chemicals cause weather, the enlightenment was the apogee of science and that Christianity caused the 'fall' of Rome; or that Islam-is-peace. Then the nuances along with the 'factual science' are 'settled'. So the hair-flickers opine.

Huntington's thesis about a clash of Moslem 'civilization' with every other 'civilization' is about as uncontroversial as one could get. 1400 years of incessant Jihad against non-Moslems is rather obvious proof of his central theme. Jihad attacks in the modern era – some 25.000 since 9-11 – confirm the historical veracity that Islam is intolerant and desirous of world domination.

Huntington: "People are always tempted to divide people into us and them, the in-group and the other, our civilization and those barbarians. Scholars have analyzed the world in terms of the Orient and the Occident, North and South, center and periphery. Muslims have traditionally divided the world into Dar al-Islam and Dar a-Harb, the abode of peace and the abode of war." Samuel Huntington, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1996), 32

For Moslems as stated in their key liturgical documents the House of War – inhabited by the Infidels – must be destroyed. Period.

The big-brains will point out exceptions. Moslems allied with the French monarchy, itself a decrepit, corrupt and deceitful organization; during the Medieval period. Turks allied with the British and French to fight off the Russians. Various pacts and agreements between Christians and Moslems dating from the time of the Crusades. The odd Moslem helping a Christian or Jew. Political convenience, the very rare charity of a Moslem to a non-Moslem; or the self-interested treaty between a Moslem and non-Moslem state do not negate the modern Jihad designed to wipe out Jewry and Christians in a faith holocaust; nor do they obviate the unfettered violence stretching back to the founder of the Moslem cult and its barbaric document Mein Koran, which luridly calls for the destruction of non-Moslems.

Huntington only stated the obvious. Reality always shocks the Marxist-PC-mainstream media-academic axis of ignorance. They can't believe that anyone would have the gonads and the temerity to look at reality and declaim the obvious. Anger explodes when the fascist PC dictums are declared morally and factually bankrupt. Witness today the sobs of tears for Arab-Moslem 'mothers' whose children used as shields by the fascist Moslem group Hamas are inadvertently killed by Israelis. No tears are wept for the hundreds of dead Israelis wiped out by Moslem rockets over the past 15 years.

Islam is a total cult dedicated firstly to the Meccan Lord Hub'Al the moon deity, or 'The One', namely al-ilah. Allah does not mean God. Second, Islam is a cult totally dedicated to the most important man in history [before Barry Soetoro], namely Muhammad. Read the Koran. There is not a scintilla of an ethical program within the Koran. Moslems are to be nice to non-Moslems and kill or dominate everyone else. It is a lurid, dichotomous and obscenely intolerant world-view that the Nazis and Communists would also employ.

The Nazis annihilated the Churches because they opposed the cult of Hitler [and its 'science' of evolution]. The Communists tore down 40.000 Orthodox Churches and erased Christianity because as in Germany, Christian metaphysics was in opposition to the National Socialist/Fascist/Communist plan, itself also based on 'science' and the perfectibility via the state of mankind's character [a form of utopian evolution].

Moslems are erasing Christianity across the world, because the Christian project as stated in the Koran, is the enemy of Islam.

'Militant Moslems' blow up the shrine to Jonah – a  2.000 year old artifact of Christian faith. Proving that Islam is love and tolerance.

Syrian soldiers whose heads found a new home on spikes, courtesy of 'Extremist' Islam:

This is a good introduction to the history and development of the Catholic Church. Hitchcock lays out some eternal and important truths about the development of Christianity – which not only saved civilization but created it. No other culture in the world, no other cult or paganism in world history, has had such a profound impact on the creation of modernity and civilization than Christianity. That is simply an irrefutable fact.

The timing of the Christian message:

Although the Roman Empire eventually attempted to exterminate the Church, the early Christians believed that God made use of all things for His own purposes and had given the Empire itself a providential role in the spread of the faith. As St. Paul explained, Jesus was sent “when the time had fully come” (Gal 4:4), when the necessary conditions had been met. The Empire formed a geographical and cultural unity, and the Pax Romana (Roman peace) allowed relatively safe and easy travel all over the Mediterranean, thereby facilitating missionary efforts. By preaching and making use of synagogues in cities and large towns, evangelizers were able to reach the largest number of people.

Intellectual tradition

At Alexandria (Egypt), one of the great intellectual centers of the new faith, St. Clement (d. ca. 217) and Origen (d. ca. 254) spoke of Tradition as being found not only in formal doctrinal statements but also in the liturgy, catechetical writings, and creeds recited at baptism. Divine truth was to be found in the Scripture, but not only there. Numerous beliefs commonly accepted by later Christians came down solely through Tradition—both matters of substantive belief, such as the Assumption of Mary into Heaven, and lesser things, such as Joachim and Anna being the names of Mary’s parents and the Magi being named Caspar, Melchior, and Balthasar.

[This means that 'sola scriptura 'is utterly invalid]

The early Christians were an urban people, if for no other reason than that cities provided the best opportunity for evangelization. The pagani were literally the rural people—those who had not yet heard the Gospel and still worshipped the old gods. But with the end of persecution, and with sudden numerical growth, “stational churches”—what were later called parishes—were established in the larger cities.

Right to life:

Not only did the Romans practice abortion, every father had the right to decide whether or not a newborn child should be allowed to live. The Church also departed from Roman law in certain other ways, as in allowing marriage between a free woman and a slave.

Without condemning wealth or social status, the Church was egalitarian: in the Kingdom relationships between rich and poor were almost inverted, as saintly beggars could be superior to princes, and slaves might be more exalted than their masters.

Dying for the faith:

Martyrdom was inflicted in a variety of ways. Stephen was stoned to death, which was the Jewish penalty for blasphemy. Under Nero (54-68), Christians were coated with tar and set on fire in the amphitheatre to light the night games, and over the next two centuries, numerous Christians were sent into the arena to be torn apart by wild beasts, as Ignatius anticipated would happen to him. Paul, as a Roman citizen, was honorably beheaded, while Peter was dishonorably crucified (upside down, according to tradition, because he did not consider himself worthy to die as his Lord had died). Some martyrs were mutilated, sent to the mines, and worked to death; others were buried alive, burned en masse, or strapped into iron chairs that were slowly heated until they roasted to death.

Free will and reason:

The Christian emphasis on human free will, albeit impaired by sin, was a liberating alternative to belief in Fate. Christianity recognized the ultimate emptiness of a purely earthly existence, offered hope of eternal life, and laid down an inspiring ethic based on love and the practical discipline necessary to achieve it.

Jesus’ parable of the wheat and the tares teaches that good and evil exist together in the world, and the reality of human freedom provides the only satisfactory explanation of moral evil—God’s mysterious willingness to grant that freedom and permit its full exercise, even when it is used to thwart His divine plan.

For Augustine [late 4^th- 5^th century], the crucial mystery of existence was the human will and its perverse attraction to evil. He was the first person in history able to recount his own subjective experiences while looking at them with ruthless objectivity, writing a psychologically acute account of his inner life that had no equivalent in the ancient world.

Developing civilization

Christians in effect became the custodians of that [Greek-Roman] civilization. Difficult though it would have been to achieve, they might have tried to destroy Hellenistic civilization as irredeemably pagan, and, had they done so, the later history of the world would have been unimaginably different.

Judaism was to a great extent hostile to Hellenistic civilization, and, had Christianity remained entirely within the Hebrew cultural ambience, its theology would have developed in very different ways. In particular, it would probably have been content to affirm merely that “Jesus is Lord”, without inquiring too closely into the meaning of that affirmation. But Christianity went beyond its Jewish roots and spread wherever Hellenistic civilization was influential.

Christianity played a crucial role in the development of man’s understanding of history itself, vanquishing the cyclical view of endless repetition that expressed a kind of despair, the sense that men were trapped in a process they could not control. Christianity gave history an eschaton, a goal toward which it relentlessly moves and which for the first time allowed that movement to have meaning.

One of the Church’s greatest achievements—one of the great creative achievements in the history of the world—was to bring about a synthesis between Christianity and classical civilization in the highly sophisticated theology of the second through fifth centuries.

Metaphysical spirituality

Greek terminology helped Christian theologians describe the nature of God. The Old Testament spoke of God in ways that seemed to say that He was subject to emotion and capable of changing His mind. To the Greek philosophers, however, truth had to be immutable, so the Fathers insisted that God must be immutable and absolute, without limit or change, since change implies imperfection. The Fathers backed up the concept by also citing the voice that spoke to Moses from the burning bush—“I am Who am” (Ex 3:14, NAB)

Neo-Platonism affirmed that the spiritual, transcendent, unseen world is real and the world of experience a pale copy that can give only hints of ultimate reality.

Christendom and its theology is thus a complexity of ideas, influences, truths, realities, metaphysical ideals, aspirations and beliefs. The importance of the Christian faith can be found in any area of life, but without question it was the Christian project and ideal, which over 2.000 years took the best elements of 'classical' civilization and impelled them forward to a rational, reasonable, and life-giving superior civilization. Only in Christian theology are women, slaves, the poor, the sick, the dispossessed and the helpless elevated to the first rank. Only in Christendom will one find a merger of the practical and the theological.  

Moslem Fascism – just following the Koran. ISIS is planning a Christian genocide in Iraq, marking the houses of Christians with a 'N' or Nazarene. Christians are being raped, attacked, their propery and wealth confiscated, and the Moslems are going to slaughter thousands of them – as per Koranic 'law', better termed bronze-age barbarism. Western Moslemophiles will twitter with delight, flicking their hair and orgasming over the benefices of multi-culturalism, whilst they regale themselves, like the brain-dead of the world do, with reality-tv.

“Departing Christians who attempted to take belongings [Mosul in Iraq] said they were robbed of their possessions and forced to take residence in camps for displaced persons. 

Phones, money, jewelry were all confiscated. Even the cars in which they have tried to flee have been taken. One woman claimed to be robbed of $15,000. Even wedding rings are being seized. 

The Islamic State is serious about its intention to form a new Islamic Caliphate in the Middle East and to export Islam by whatever means necessary. The initial conquest is over, and now the consolidation of power has started. Once the cities and borders are secure, the state will likely cast its hungry gaze on neighboring cities, without respect for borders.”  Link

Arab Moslems have engaged in Jihad against Jews since the founding of the Meccan moon cult. Al-ilah means the Lord, it does not mean God in the Judaic sense of the word. The Lord of Mecca was Baal, famous within the Old Testament as a cult of evil, which included child sacrifice, polygamy, bloody animal votive offerings, and little in the way of morality or ethics. Hub'Al or Hu Baal was the Meccan Baal.

In the time of King David and his son the profligate and highly overrated Solomon, Gaza was Jewish territory. So too was the West Bank. Samaria was populated by the 'Samaritans', transplanted Babylonian Jews who settled there post 540 BC and who had a different interpretation of Jewish scripture. They were shunned by the more Orthodox Jews, but Samaritans still considered themselves Jewish. Long in advance of the Meccan moon cult, the Jewish empire and its lands which at one time extended from Gaza to Damascus was a salient geo-political fact and force. Destroyed first by the Assyrians [722 BC], then by Babylon [587 BC]; the Jewish state was reconstituted under Cyrus the Persian in 540 BC.

The fact is that the Jewish state and its lands, including that of Gaza pre-date the Meccan moon cult by at least 1600 years. So who is squatting on whose land ?

The violence emanating from Hamas, Fatah, Hizbollah and other Moslem-fascist groups against the Jewish state will never end. The reason is simple – Koranic and Moslem anti-Semitic culture. The Koran mandates the destruction of all Jews [and all Christians as well]. Blaming the Jew for Moslem violence and Jihad is an apogee of stupidity. If Hamas and the Gazans were to forswear violence, destroy their rockets and tunnels, and turn their energies to commerce, education and development, peace would reign. But this will never happen as long as Islam and its Koranic fascism hold sway over any society, including the non-culture in 'Gaza', yet another example of a failed Arab-Moslem state. 

Many myths abound about the Medieval period. The lies spread by Atheists, and pro-Moslems are not only in the main quite ludicrous, but also extraordinarily ignorant. When you hear them, you wonder if the speaker possesses any sentience whatsoever. One persistent myth is that there was no 'medicine', or that it was 'imported' from those fantastically capable and alert Moslems, an often-stated mendacity, that titillates the Church haters. Moslems in the atheist-Marxist world-view are the supposed progenitors of all that is civilized. This is why the Moslem world today is such a paradise of plurality and prosperity of course.

In actual fact medieval medicine as found in Christendom was almost entirely a local-regional phenomenon based on what today is termed 'homeopathy', and on natural 'holistic' principles, now in vogue, but standard practice from 800-1500 AD. It was decidedly superior to Moslem methods, which relied almost exclusively on failed Greek ideals, perpetuated by Galen, who unfortunately still had a lot of followers in Medieval Europe as well. Few real Moslem creations in medicine were unique, or of much use. And those which were, always emanated from converts.

Christendom invented hospitals, and medical research. This is a simple fact. These institutions date back to the 3^rd century AD, or some 300 years before the madness of Muhammad's cult and Jihad began. The Nestorian hospital complexes, which were the largest in the world by the time of the Moslem Jihad, were centres of learning and research as well as care for the ill. But these centres were resident all across Europe by 700 AD. Monasteries and priories across the width and breadth of Europe, during the non-existent 'dark age' [a reference to modern cults perhaps], were active and free, sustained by Church tithes and the donations of the rich.

Starting from the 3^rd century, medicine advanced in leaps and bounds over Greco-Roman illiteracy. Christian doctors and healers were the first to advocate complete cleanliness of the body and of course of specific wounds and ailments. Pagan superstitions about 'bad air' [a Roman preoccupation], or 'the gods make you ill' [a Greek-Germanic ideal], were replaced by observation. The use of cautery in treating wounds was first developed by Christians in the 4^th century; and by the 9^th century Christian hospitals were the first to develop anesthesia using a mix of henbane and opium, for surgical procedures.  Common surgery included amputations, removal of brain and bodily tumors, removal of foreign objects such as metal, and bone repair. Nuns by 650 AD had formed the first order of nurses, and from England to Sicily, nuns and Christian healers worked side by side to treat the sick. Almost all Christian hospitals were free of charge.

Most of the infirmary wards were sited in areas which provided natural herbs and remedies. In many places even today, one can visit these sites and behold the 200-300 different varieties of plants nearby which were the hospital's pharmacopoeia. I doubt today that anyone visiting these sites could identify 3 plants correctly. There was no Moslem influence here, but local knowledge and experimentation. Indeed the Christian hospital had dedicated monks, who delved in experimentation of recipes and concoctions, in the attempt to resolve specific ailments and complaints. In fact many herbal remedies were superior to what we have today. It is doubtful that our modern society so stuffed on pills filled with poison have improved in-toto, our intake of medicine. Abortion as well seems to be rather pagan and murderous does it not ? In some ways modernity is a regression.

Converted Moslems, or Jews, Persians and Christians with Moslem names, did contribute some knowledge about smallpox, meningitis and other infectious diseases. This information was enthusiastically added to the catalogue of Christian knowledge. Dedicated university faculties of medicine at Bologna and elsewhere, were only too eager to adopt whatever worked, from wherever it came. Not so the Moslem world. The transfer of information was uni-directional. Though Christian medicine, and its institutions were far in advanced of the Moslem, then as now, the Moslems guided by their moon deity, believed they had nothing to learn from the infidel ape and pig. A lie much cherished by Marxist, Atheists, and the big-brains of the world. Christian medicine in the medieval period was not 'dark'. Our ignorance is what is truly dark.  

William Muir, one of the best 19^th century historians on the Meccan moon cult named Submission, was certainly not an anti-Muhammadan. In fact Muir's rather concise histories on Islam take an admiring tone. Yet even Muir states at one point [p. 307-310], that the historian has to take into account the massive character failures of Submission's founder, and deep and dark they are indeed. Savagery permeates not only the Koran but the life of Mahomet, as Muir wrote in 1861, in the “Life of Mahomet” [free download]:

“ [during yet another raid of plunder]....Mahomet appears to have felt that this punishment exceeded the bounds of humanity. He accordingly promulgated a Revelation, in which capital punishment is limited to simple death or crucifixion. Amputation of the hands and feet, is however, sanctioned as a penal measure; and amputation of the hand is even enjoined as a penal measure for theft, whether the criminal be male or female. This barbarous custom has accordingly been perpetuated throughout the Moslem world.”

So mad Mahomet had yet another convenient 'Revelation', from his unknown 'god' [Hub'al the moon deity of Mecca]; this time on sordid, bronze-age inspired punishment for crimes real or imagined. Keep in mind that Sura 5:33 states clearly that those who make 'mischief in the land', with mischief meaning opposing Muhammadanism in any form, are to be killed, executed, humiliated and crucified.

In the Bronze-age code of Hammurabi circa 1750 BC, we see much that is found in the Koran, regarding 'crime and punishment'. In fact I would urge people to read Hammurabi's code and compare it to the Koran. From Encyclopedia Britannica 1910:

“In the criminal law the ruling principle was the lex talionis. Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, limb for limb was the penalty for assault upon an amelu [the higher classes]. A sort of symbolic retaliation was the punishment of the offending member, seen in the cutting off the hand that struck a father or stole a trust; in cutting off the breast of a wet-nurse who substituted a changeling for the child entrusted to her; in the loss of the tongue that denied father or mother (in the Elamite contracts the same penalty was inflicted for perjury); in the loss of the eye that pried into forbidden secrets. The loss of the surgeon's hand that caused loss of life or limb or the brander's hand that obliterated a slave's identification mark, are very similar. The slave, who struck a freeman or denied his master, lost an ear, the organ of hearing and symbol of obedience. To bring another into danger of death by false accusation was punished by death. To cause loss of liberty or property by false witness was punished by the penalty the perjurer sought to bring upon another.

The death penalty was freely awarded for theft and other crimes regarded as coming under that head, for theft involving entrance of palace or temple treasury, for illegal purchase from minor or slave, for selling stolen goods or receiving the same, for common theft in the open (in default of multiple restoration) or receiving the same, for false claim to goods, for kidnapping, for assisting or harbouring fugitive slaves, for detaining or appropriating same, for brigandage, for fraudulent sale of drink, for disorderly conduct of tavern, for delegation of personal service, for misappropriating the levy, for oppression of feudal holders, for causing death of a householder by bad building. The manner of death is not specified in these cases. This death penalty was also fixed for such conduct as placed another in danger of death. A specified form of death penalty occurs in the following cases:-gibbeting (on the spot where crime was committed) for burglary, later also for encroaching on the king's highway, for getting a slave-brand obliterated, for procuring husband's death; burning for incest with own mother, for vestal entering or opening tavern, for theft at fire (on the spot); drowning for adultery, rape of betrothed maiden, bigamy, bad conduct as wife, seduction of daughter-in-law.”

Koranic Sharia law is an eye for eye process. Mischief including theft, brigandage, disobeying the Muhammadan cult, ignoring rites and rituals, or second class slaves such as Jews and Christians pretending to be the same as a Moslem; are all punished harshly. So it was in the time of Hammurabi some 2400 years before the advent of Muhammad's reign of terror. Codifying something as archaic and bronze-age as the Babylonian system of punishment is not, in my view, 'progress', but regression. Surely after 2400 years some other ideas should have been developed ?

Muir to his credit, though an admirer of Mahomet in many ways, does catalogue an endless tale of crime committed by the 'prophet' of Submission. These crimes are many and legendary and surely inform his cult and its present day modern savagery. I would offer that Mahomet's god was the devil since it was he who instituted in the guise of a religious lie, murder, polygamy, sex-slaving, Jihad, plunder, Jew hate, Christianophobia, and civilizational destruction. A prophet one assumes of death, wanton mayhem, totalitarianism and unenlightened sexual lust. The dichotomous aspect of Islam is very clear to any who have read the Koran, and who have read any objective work about Mahomet, such as Muir's. It is quite clear that Islam was a military-political project and was quite divorced from metaphysics. The Koran is focused not on spiritual development, but societal control.  

About 170.000 Christians are martyred for their faith each year (over 400 per day). Link

The huge brains not only do not care, they revel in the blood of martyred Christians. Gays, Lesbians, Trangenders and Moslem 'feelings' are far more important to the really clever people, than huge stacks of mutilated Christians. Out of 191 countries, Christians are being persecuted in over 130. Link to list of countries which persecute Christianity. The top Christian-persecuting states are all Moslem, with the exception of atheist North Korea which is in the process of killing 70.000 Christians.

The Moslem-Atheist Jihad is a world-wide phenomenon. We are witnessing in real time nothing less than a world-wide faith genocide. The attacks against Christianity today and in the past 100 years; are more virulent, bloody, barbaric and industrialized, than at any other time in Church history. 200 million Christians, today right now, are being attacked, or are under threat of Jihadic violence and intolerance. This is 10% of the total number of Christians in the world.

Consider the following:

• Christianity was 20% or more of the Near East population in 1900. Today it is less than 2 %. Why? Islam and the Jihad.

• Hitler's Evolution-Darwinian regime gassed 5 million Catholics

• Stalin's Atheist regime tore down 40.000 Churches and murdered some 5-10 million Russian Orthodox believers

• Mao's Atheist regime murdered hundreds of thousands of Christians – a process still on-going in today's 'modernizing' China

• Iraq: half of Iraq's Christians have fled the country since the fall of Hussein and in the past year some 5.000 have been murdered; including babies, innocents, and pregnant women. Churches have been torn down, and now ISIS is murdering Christians going door to door seeking them out in some cities.

• Egypt: Moslems are attacking Christians, raping Christian women and forcing Coptic Christians from their homes

• Syria: By 2012, most of the 80,000 Christians in Homs had been 'cleansed' from their homes. ISIS and Moslem 'radicals' are still murdering Christians in 2014 in a so-called civil war – one fascism to be replaced by yet another.

• Iran: Moslems who apostasize and convert to Christianity are killed – by law.

• India: up to 70,000 Christians in Orissa have been forced to flee their homes from Hindu mobs

• Indonesia: Between 2000-2002 Muslims slaughtered 10,000 Christians, and the persecution still goes on 12 years later. The Moslem violence against Christians is now found in the Philippines and Malaysia.

• Europe: EU equality directives, mosque funding, Moslem immigration programs and Moslem-only schools are feeding into anti-Christian sentiment across the Continent. Hate speech laws target Christians who speak out against Islam.

• USA: Following the EU's path. The Federal government is actively engaged in trying to control the Catholic Church and make the Church conform to secularist theology. Moslem immigration is at all-time highs, and Moslem 'faith' groups, which promote the destruction of Christianity are funded by tax-money.

Lies, myths and innuendo which arespread about the Church and Medieval and modern Christianity by the Atheist/Humanist class of Dhummies. A list would include:

1) Myths about Church doctrine / corruption

-The Bible is the opposite of the Koran or any other document [it defends free-will, freedom, universal ethics, reason and faith]

-The Bible has two very important and self-reinforcing 'books' [laws and historiography; and the gospel of the golden rule]

-Catholics do not worship Mary and other apocrypha

-Christ did die and was resurrected [miracles do happen, there is an immaterial energy]

-Sola Scriptura [Luther] is wrong [he denies free-will, individual conscience]

-Era of Papal corruption was defined and short [but real]

-Women were / are freed in Christian theology

2) Myths about the Church being anti-science

-'Enlightenment', Protestant, anti-Church lies based on a wilful ignorance of the past

-There is a long list of scientific accomplishments in the medieval era from 500-1500

-Apogee of Western art, architecture, literature, language was in the Medieval period – how to explain that in a 'dark age'

-900-1300 greatest increase in living standards in history until 1750 [industrialization]

-Galileo and Bruno myths [nothing to do with science]

-Evolution, Naturalism, Cosmological myths and non-science abound

3) The Inquisition

-2500 people killed over 250 years [about ¼ of yearly Moslem daughter slaughter]

-The State not the Church, killed those condemned

-In some areas the Inquisition was necessary [Albigensian, intra-Church corruption]

-Church canon law was superior to secular law [and informed secular law later on]

4) Crusade myths

-For 400 years Moslems destroyed Christian civilization from Syria to southern France

-Some 1-2 million Christians were enslaved, tens of millions forcibly converted

-The unending Jihad included rape, yearly campaigns of war, piracy, plunder

-Jerusalem retaken in 1099 was not 'knee deep in blood'

-List of Moslem atrocities against Christians is long and sordid

-Banking, Trade, Capital innovations – all occurred in Christian Europe from 900-1200

5) Myths re Church intolerance/anti-Semiticism

-Catechism by its nature is open, tolerant

-Jews made up the early Christian church

-Jews were not persecuted by the Church [eg Crusades, medieval Europe]

-1 million Jews saved by Catholics and the Vatican in WW2

-Church did not direct imperialism/genocide/subjugation

6) Hitler was a Christian

-Nazi theology was Darwinian/Evolutionary

-Hitler hated Christianity, so did the Nazi leadership

-Bible was outlawed in 1942, Church under Nazi control

-5 million Catholics were gassed during WW2

Today the pagan barbarity of abortion, Darwinism, Islam [it is a cult not a religion]; and other Atheistic-naturalist theologies are rarely condemned. 'Humanists' or Atheists and Marxists, have spent 400 years rewriting history. Lies are not facts. Neither is propaganda reasonable history.