French    German    Spain    Italian    Arabic    Chinese Simplified    Russian

Western Civilisation

Western Civilisation was and is superior to anything Islam has developed.  Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam.  Raising the alarm about the fascism called Submission since 2000.  


Books Reviewed - Recent Articles

The Palestinian Delusion: The Catastrophic History of the Middle East Peace Process, Robert Spencer

There never was a Palestine. There is always the Moslem Jihad and racism.

Bookmark and Share



Link to Amazon

An anodyne to the Fake News media, Fake Education, Fake Moslem-victimhood cults, which caper and scamper over the information landscape, like diseased baboons, braying and howling their toxic falsehoods.  Mr Spencer is the author of over 20 books on the Moslem Jihad, an expert, erudite, urbane, factual, unemotional, equipoised.  His site is an indispensable account of the modern Moslem Jihad, a continuation of 1400 years of Infidel-Kuffar slaughter, rape and domination and associated societal destruction. 


Very few real facts about Muhammadism (as ‘Islam’ was rightly called up to the end of the 19th century) are to be found in schools, universities or the Fake News MSM.  The truth about the cult of Muhammad can be found however in reality and in the endless, ceaseless Jihadic violence of the Meccan cult, which is on full display every day around the world.  1500 verses of hate speech against Jews, Christians and non-Moslems permeates their book ‘Recital’ (Koran).  There is no peace until Muhammadism rules over the Jews and Christians.


To state this truth, is as Orwell wrote, now a revolutionary act. 


Robert Spencer explains the Moslem Jihadic reality in Fake ‘Palestine’, in a book full of facts and history that there never was a Palestine, why there has never been a Palestinian ‘people’, state or empire; and why there never will be ‘peace’ in the Middle East until every Jew (and Christian we should also emphasise) is dead or a dhimmi-slave.  This is what Muhammadism means by submission and peace.  The Kuffar is dead or under complete Moslem domination. 


An uncomfortable fact for those who advance the claim that the Palestinians are the indigenous people of the area is that they have no history: there was never a state of Palestine, never a king or president of Palestine, never (until quite recently) a Palestinian flag, and nothing that distinguishes the Palestinians culturally, linguistically, or otherwise from the other Arabs of the region.


In 1946, the Arab American historian Philip Hitti testified before the 1946 Anglo-American Committee of Inquiry: “There is no such thing as Palestine in history, absolutely not”—meaning that there had never been a nation bearing this name.


the KGB (the Soviet Committee for State Security) invented the “Palestinians,” an even smaller people who were, the propaganda insisted, oppressed by a powerful and ruthless Israel. The French historians Guy Millière and David Horowitz, authors of the book Comment le peuple palestinien fut inventé (How the Palestinian People Were Invented), explain that the Palestinians were invented in order to “transform a population into a weapon of mass destruction against Israel and the Jewish people, to demonize Israel, and to give totalitarianism and anti-Semitism renewed means of action.”


Syrian President Hafez Assad once told Yasser Arafat: “You do not represent Palestine as much as we do. Never forget this one point: There is no such thing as a Palestinian people, there is no Palestinian entity, there is only Syria. You are an integral part of the Syrian people, Palestine is an integral part of Syria. Therefore it is we, the Syrian authorities, who are the true representatives of the Palestinian people.”


Prince Hassan of the Jordanian National Assembly put it simply on February 2, 1970: “Palestine is Jordan and Jordan is Palestine; there is only one land, with one history and one and the same fate.”


King Hussein of Jordan put it most succinctly of all in 1981: “The truth is that Jordan is Palestine and Palestine is Jordan.”


Palestine never existed.  The original Balfour declaration and land assigned to the Jewish state was eventually split into two parts - one Moslem called Jordan, the other Jewish, called Israel.  


Philistinia (Greek) did exist along the coast of Israel into Lebanon.  This is a historical and archaeological fact witnessed in the Old Testament as well.  Judea, Judah and Samaria existed, likewise proven and without debate.  The Romans in AD 130 renamed Judea and Judah ‘Palestine’ (Latin for Philistine), the hard enemies of the Hebrews and Jews, who lived along the coast, represented in the Old Testament by the 8 to 9 foot tall Goliath and his 5 brothers, with Goliath improbably slain by the Jew Shepherd David.


Such facts are apparently quite shocking to the majority of low-information ignoramuses who suffuse our ‘modern’ society.  The same half-wits who vote for the Moslem invasion of their Western state, who chant their ‘Palestinian’ slogans in howls of Jew-hate and racism; and who are completely ignorant about the 1400 year Moslem Jihad to control the globe with 250 million victims the result of history’s most baleful Fascism.


Spencer: “Jihad,” Arabic for “struggle,” in Islamic theology primarily means warfare against unbelievers in order to establish the supremacy of the Muslims over them, and the hegemony of Islamic law. This is a religious imperative, based on the Qur’an’s command to fight against the People of the Book and ensure that they “feel themselves subdued” (9:29). It makes it impossible for Muslims to accept a Jewish state in which Muslims live,


The Jews have always lived in Israel dating back to 2000 BC.  Even after the Roman-induced diasporas of AD 70 and 130, the Jews persisted.  The Moslems conquered the area in 637 AD and when the Ottoman Moslem empire withered and died, the land of Israel was depopulated, poor and without a Moslem presence.


The desolate area began to show new life. In 1900, a British consulate report stated that “there can be no doubt that the establishment of the Jewish colonies in Palestine has brought about a great change in the aspect of that country.” Four years later, another British consular report declared that “the Jewish element is spreading all over Palestine and represents today the most enterprising part of the population.”


The Jews who made aliyah in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries didn’t come as armed marauders, seizing land from its owners by force. They obtained the land in a far more conventional and prosaic way: they bought it.


The Jews overpaid for the land in Israel from absentee Moslem owners in Ottoman lands and Egypt.


When the emigration of Jews to Israel began in the late 19th century, the land was desolate, unpopulated. When the Jews rebuilt civilisation and wealth, which did not exist prior the 5 waves of Jewish resettlement, Arab Moslems began arriving to partake of the success, and as always, immediately claimed victimhood, suffering and angst at the growing Jewish presence in a land they had long forsaken.  Arab Moslem riot and violence against Jews continued until the Jewish state was proclaimed in 1947, then the official Jihad began.  Israel has been attacked by Moslems in 6 wars and 3 major ‘intifadas’ or uprisings, all the while giving up land and security for ‘peace’.


Islam is still Islam. Its Qur’an has not changed; neither has its theology. The imperatives that led the Muslim Arabs to reject a two-state solution in 1947, and to go to war to destroy the nascent Jewish state in 1948, still exist, and are still believed by millions of Muslims worldwide. It is only by ignoring this, or by remaining in blissful willful ignorance of it, that diplomats and presidents and kings could ever have thought that a negotiated agreement could be hit upon that would enable Israelis and Palestinians to lay down their arms and live side by side in peace.


All that happens with ‘peace talks’, is that the Jewish state shrinks, its borders become insecure, the Moslems increase their numbers and population on the ceded territory to launch yet more attacks.  The Moslems called ‘Palestinians’ are swelled from UN Refugee camps, dating back to 1948.  At one time there were maybe 50.000 ‘refugees’, now the number is climbing to 2 million – some 70 years after the first Moslem Jihad against the Israeli state.  The ‘Palestinians’ are kept poor, uneducated, for a reason – to provide cannon fodder for the Jihad and the Ghazi or Moslem warriors.  Palestinian education is Koranic propaganda, much of it hate against Israel and the West, with declarations of Jihad and Jew genocide.  Even the Fake News has documented these facts. 


None of the great worthies feted by the Western media – Sadat, Arafat, Abbas – leaders of the Moslem Arabs in Israel (or Palestinians), were dedicated to peace.  As Spencer so accurately writes, all of these ‘great’ personalities were dedicated to Israel’s destruction using different means.  The ‘Palestinian’ leadership is of course corrupt and extremely wealthy, even as the average Moslem in their territory suffers.


Particularly maddening to many Palestinians is the vast corruption of their leaders. Mahmoud Abbas and his two sons control a business empire worth four hundred million dollars. Two of the Hamas leaders have done even better. Dr. Musa Abu Marzook, the number-two man in Hamas, has a net worth of two to three billion dollars. The leader of Hamas’s political wing, Khaled Mashaal, is also a billionaire. Dr. Moshe Elad, a colonel in the Israeli army and a lecturer in the Middle East Department at Western Galilee Academic College, says: “Estimates around the world are that Mashaal is currently worth $2.6 billion, but the numbers mentioned by the Arab commentators (based on their many sources) are much higher, varying from two to five billion dollars invested in Egyptian and Persian Gulf banks, and some in real estate projects in the Persian Gulf countries.” Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh has an estimated four million dollars.


The Palestinian delusion is about Jihad, money, power and destroying Jews.  Anyone who buys into it, is abetting Moslem fascism and racism.  Any student, teacher, armchair general and expert who expounds support for the ‘Palestinians’ against the Jewish state has not bothered to read Mein Koran, Moslem history, or the absurd fantasy surrounding the ‘Palestinian state’.  They need to read this book to re-educate themselves and get a firmer grasp on reality. 



Islam: Religion of Peace?: The Violation of Natural Rights and Western Cover-Up, Fr. Portella

Were Communism or Nazism, theologies of love and peace?

Bookmark and Share

Islam: Religion of Peace?


Finally, a Catholic Priest with a clue.  To answer his question: no, of course not.  Islam is not peace anymore than Slavery is Freedom, or Nazism a project of ‘equality’.


The Church saturated with its Gay Priests and the 40 year sex-scandal with Gays molesting altar boys (the LGBT bona fides) ; its Globaloney-warming-baloney-complex (its fake science bona fides); its election of a ridiculous perhaps non-Catholic as Pope calling himself Francis the II (its Earth Friendly bona fides, though Francis Assisi did try to convert Moslems unlike the present Pope Stupid); its deeply neurotic Vatican-Curia-led love and admiration for the Moslem fascism (emanating from Vatican II and general illiteracy), which has spent 1400 years trying to eradicate the Catholic Church and which is killing Christians every day; may seem beyond any hope of redemption or relevancy in the defence of Western Civilisation and Christianity.  Enter Priest Portella, from a very small minority of Priests who see the world for what it is.  It would not surprise me if he was removed, de-frocked, and humiliated, for his criticism of the Fascism called Muhammadism or Submission (Islam).  Pope Frank the Stupid will take a dim view of Portella’s erudition (assuming he can read and comprehend what is written).


Portella (bold is mine):

Islamists, through the doctrine of dawa (outreach or proselyting), which is an all-encompassing precursor to jihad, seek to convert non-Muslims and summon them to conquer the West, utilizing any number of mechanisms to achieve that goal. While the West is preoccupied with fighting hate speech, Islamophobia, and white supremacist groups, it seems to have willfully ignored the cultivation of Muslim hate speech and supremacist attitudes toward non-Muslims through dawa. Cultural jihadists have also gained headway through their own charities and well-bankrolled networks, which have enabled them to infiltrate university campuses and influence the media and government officials. Consequently, they are able to foster dialogue and coalition building, favorable to their political arrangement and consistent with the political-religious foundation of the sharia. This has become evident by having preferential treatment over other religious denominations despite the separation of church and state as outlined by the First Amendment, such as the prayer room that was set up in 2017 for Muslims at Liberty High School in Frisco, Texas, at taxpayers’ expense. Islamists, personifying themselves in the media as victims of religious hatred and with the help of philanthropists such as George Soros and organizations such as the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR) and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), have been partially successful….


The ignorance of the Arabs:

As the medieval Arab historian Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) said, the Arabs were an ignorant race, with no literary or scientific knowledge, and when they wished to probe the mysteries of creation and the universe they turned for information to the Jews [and Christian literature] who had accepted Islam. These, says this learned author, were no less ignorant than the surrounding Arabs; but they brought over into Islam a mass of their own traditions, especially those dealing with the origin of the creation and with the future of the human race.

(the Koran) is a medieval codification of Bedouin customs that pre-date Islam which are still in force today, such as female genital mutilation, draconian-type penal sanctions for adultery, and theft and the commerce of slavery. Given the current political events, the subject of jihad shall be given primary attention in this section. Jihad is a divine call which all Muslims must respond to.


Mein Koran jumbles up and mis-quotes many passages from the Bible.  The Arab Bedouin, including Muhammad, were illiterate, poor and on the fringes of far greater and richer civilisations – which they coveted – such as the Sassanid and Byzantine Christian empires.  They viewed the Jewish and Christian communities and traders in their midst as far more successful than themselves and wished to emulate them.  The monotheistic traditions and cultural attributes along with related economic and social success, impressed the Arabs and they tried to copy Jews and Christians.  When they were rejected under the leadership of the brigand Muhammad, they simply killed and stole what they viewed as ‘Allah’s’ and Muhammad’s.


Jihad – kill the Infidel:

Fight in the name of Allah and in the way of Allah. Fight against those who disbelieve in Allah. Make a holy war.… When you meet your enemies who are polytheists, invite them to three courses of action.… If they refuse to migrate, tell them that they will have the status of Bedouin Muslims and will be subjected to the Commands of Allah like other Muslims, but they will not get any share from the spoils of war or Fai’ except when they actually fight with the Muslims (against the disbelievers). If they refuse to accept Islam, demand from them the jizya. If they agree to pay, accept it from them and hold off your hands. If they refuse to pay the tax, seek Allah’s help and fight them.—Sahih Muslim, Book 19, hadith 4294

The genesis of Islam, by contrast, was inextricably tied with the formation of a sovereign society that was inherently universal and imperialist. Temporal and religious powers, which were both one and the same, were combined in the person of Muhammad as Prophet, who claimed that Allah invested him with this authority. This is why he assumed altogether the role of head of state and head of the religion, which permitted him to cloak his political ambitions with a religious aura. Consequently, he channeled Islam’s energies into “its instrument of aggressive expansion, there [being] no internal organism of equal force to counterbalance it.” Muhammad offered “a programme of Arab state formation and conquest: the creation of an umma, the initiation of jihad.” He was a prophet with a political quest and not, as is so often presented, a prophet who just happened to become involved with politics.


Lots of compulsion in Mein Koran:

The People of the Book who did not accept Islam were forced to pay taxes if they wished to continue living under the newly created Islamic community. Before engaging into cohesive explanation, the entire passage of verse 256 must be read: There is no compulsion in religion. The right direction is henceforth distinct from error. And he who rejects false deities [Taghut] and believes in Allah has grasped a firm handhold which will never break Allah is Hearer, Knower. It also cannot be read independently from other verses in the second sura but in unison with them, such as verse 193: And right [fight] them until persecution is no more, and religion is for Allah. But if they desist, then let there be no hostility except against wrongdoers.

The purpose for jihad as a holy war is to invite the nonbeliever, after proselytizing (i.e., the dawa has failed, or to prevent the violation of the poll tax owed by the People of the Book): Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture [People of the Book] who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who forbid not that which Allah has forbidden by His Messenger, and follow [adopt] not the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizya willingly out of hand and have been humbled.—Sura 9, 29


Muhammad’s will to power and the slaughter of Jews and Christians:

Sira Rasul Allah (the first written biography of Muhammad) by Ibn Ishaq, which says: Allah said, “It is not for any prophet to take prisoners until he has made slaughter on earth,” i.e., “slaughtered his enemies until he drives them from the land. You [Muhammad], desire the lure of this world, its goods and the ransom captives. But Allah desires the next world [a unified earthly one],” i.e., killing them to manifest the religion which He wishes to manifest and by which the next world may be attained.—Ibn Ishaq, 326–327

The doctrine of jihad as holy war was fully developed by the height of the Middle Ages, as Arabs and Turks justified conquering other lands and, in compliance with Allah’s will, simultaneously instituting an Islamic body politic. By the late fifteenth century, jihad emerged as a divine obligatory and bellicose institution for all Muslims. It was tantamount to a religious duty because of the universalism of the Islamic mission to either convert or submit everybody to Allah’s will. Jihad, therefore, presupposed the existence of a unified Islamic umma under a caliph. It was his fard ayn (moral obligation) to expand the territory of the state and to eventually bring “the whole earth under the sway of Islam and to extirpate unbelief.”

Said Ibn al-Musayyab (642–715), considered to be among the foremost authorities in Islamic jurisprudence, “deemed fighting in the way of Allah to be an everlasting obligation upon Muslims.” Here as elsewhere, the Quran makes reference “to the activity by a derivative of the verb meaning to fight (qātala) [which appears fifty-four times, whereas qatala = to kill, appears eighty-three times]

They wish you would disbelieve as they disbelieved so you would be alike. So do not take from among them allies until they emigrate for the cause of Allah. But if they turn away, then seize them and kill them wherever you find them and take not from among them any ally or helper, save those who seek refuge with a people with whom you have a covenant, or those who come to you with hearts reluctant to fight with you, or fight for their own people. Had Allah willed, He could have given them authority over you.—Sura 4, 89–90

Moslems cannot kill other Moslems

Ibn Kathir upholds this position. Referring to the early commentator Sayid Ibn Jubayr (who lived at the time of Prophet Muhammad and was a companion of Aisha): He who allows himself to shed the blood of a Muslim, is like he who allows shedding the blood of all people. He who forbids shedding the blood of one Muslim, is like he who forbids the blood of all people. Al-Tabari and al-Qurtubi both say that the intended meaning of verse 32 refers to the killing of a soul of particular spiritual importance, such as a prophet or a “just imam,” or it stems from the point of view of the murdered individual. It is quite apparent that the pseudo-verse 32 as presented by apologists is misleading because it is not just out of context, but it is deliberately abbreviated in order to deceive those not familiar with the Quran (to say nothing of the hadiths that encourage violence). The verse in its…


Sharia Barbarism, the anti-thesis of modernity (it is not a law, but a Bronze-age, pagan ideal):

.science and technology characterize our modern world, then Islamic civilization is defined as a civilization of law (sharia), which is none other than exacting mandates as they exist in the intellect of Allah, the Lawgiver. This is why modern Islamic state law encompasses much more than a list of concessions and prohibitions, to which governmental or religious authorities have the duty to punish or reward. If this then is law, it gives the idea that it is narrated. In other words, law is prepolitical and “cannot be read as either ‘divine’ or unmediated but must be understood ‘as an aspect of hegemonic contestation, a technique of articulating political claims in terms of legal rights and duties.’”

Part of the tragedy in the Islamic world is that it is embedded in sharia law, the guide to Muslim daily living, which is founded on the sayings of Muhammad (hadiths); doctors of the law (fuqahā’) use these sayings to exercise a quasi-absolute authority over the Muslim faithful. Authorization for rigid punishment in Islamic countries, such as capital punishment for Muslims who cease to observe Islam or convert to another religion, is based on the hadith from Sahih al-Bukhari, in which the Prophet of Islam stated, “Whoever changes his [Islamic] religion, then kill him.” The Ulema in Morocco knows that this norm goes against Article 18 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which includes the right “to change … religion or belief.” In order not to contradict this article, the Prophet’s statement is now understood to mean “whoever abandons the umma” should be put to death.

Unlike the violence recorded in the Old Testament, which is limited to historical events, the Quran is more ambiguous than might be expected of a book from a god who claims to love his creation and forgive the sinner. Many contemporary Muslims exercise a personal choice to construe their sacred book’s appeal to the taking of arms and financing terrorism according to their own ideas. Islamic apologists have catered to these preferences with tenuous positions that camouflage historical fact, generally lacking any sort of profound scrutiny. This problem is not necessarily one of bad people but of bad ideology. In other words, the point of concern is not whether people are Persian, Egyptian, or Palestinian, but rather their indoctrination of the sharia, which justifies the use of violence and other human rights violations. As the General Secretary of the Nahdlatul Ulama Supreme Council, the world’s largest Muslim organization, Imam Yahya Cholil Staquf, stated: “The problem lies within Islam itself.”


The Moslem Emigration and Jihad-of-the-Womb, in the West:

In 1974, Algerian President Houari Boumendienne, in an address to the United Nations, stated, One day, millions of men will leave the Southern Hemisphere to go to the Northern Hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory. According to the Pew Research Center, “if current demographic trends continue, the number of Muslims is expected to exceed the number of Christians [worldwide] by the end of this century”; the book’s third purpose is to highlight this fact.

In France, for example, while each family has 1.8 children, Muslims have 8.1 children per family. In southern France, there are now more mosques than churches; 30% of children are Islamic. It is foreseen that by 2027, one in every five Frenchmen will be Muslim. And, if that rate continues, within two generations France will be an Islamic Republic. Within the last thirty years, the Islamic population in Great Britain rose from eighty-two thousand to two and a half million: a thirty-fold increase; there are over one thousand mosques, many of them former churches. In the Netherlands, over 50% of all newborns are Muslim, and in only fifteen years half [its] population will be all Muslim.

Vijah Kumar argues that “[a]ll Islamic mosques have Islamic leaders who can call Muslims for fighting, and as such are satellite headquarters for spreading [l]iteral Islam’s political doctrine of world domination and totalitarianism, no matter how many ‘moderate Muslims’ they serve.”


Muhammad, Sex and Sodomy:

Jurists, including al-Tabari, explain, “The boys are likened to scattered pearls, to indicate their beauty and good looks.” The question to be asked is, if the act of committing sodomy or other sexual acts with boys on the part of adult men is wrong, why does the Quran present boys in such an erotic way? There are also hadiths that apparently are used to encourage such behavior: Buhaysah reported on the authority of his father: My father sought permission from the Prophet. (When permission was granted and he came near him) he entered him and his shirt, and began to kiss him and embrace him.—Sunan Abu Dawood, Book 9, hadith 1665 Usaid ibn Hudair reported: While he was talking to people and telling jokes to make them laugh, the Prophet, peace and blessings be upon him, poked him in the side with a staff. Usaid said, “Let me retaliate!” The Prophet said, “Take retaliation.” Usaid said, “Indeed, you are wearing a shirt and I am not.” The Prophet lifted up his shirt, so he hugged him and kissed his side. Usaid said, “This is all I wanted, O Messenger of Allah.”— Musnad Ahamda, Sunan Abu Dawood, hadith 5224403 According to estimates, “as many as 50 percent of the men in the Pashtun tribal areas of southern Afghanistan take boy lovers

W. H. T. Gairdner once stated, while some of the deeds of the Prophet are considered sacrilegious in the West, they are presented in Islamic biographical works as pious. [I]ncidents in the life of an Arab conqueror, the tales of raiding, private assassinations and public executions, perpetual enlargements of the harem and so forth, might be historically explicable and therefore pardonable. [I]t is another matter that they should be taken as a setting forth of the moral ideal for all time.


Moslems slave-traded 40-50 million Blacks and 10-20 million Whites and still own 1+ million slaves today:

It is believed that in Mauritania, which has the largest population of black slaves today, more than a half-million blacks are coerced into inhumane labor, grotesque sexual practices, and breeding. According to a Human Rights Watch/Africa report, customary abuse of slaves in Mauritania include beatings, denial of food, and prolonged exposure to the sun, with hands and feet tied together.416 This was confirmed by the US State Department in 2009, when it reported: Still today [in Mauritania], masters lend their slaves’ labor to other individuals, female slaves are sexually exploited and children are made to work and rarely receive an education. Slavery particularly affects women and children, who are the most vulnerable among the vulnerable. Women of child-bearing age have a harder time emancipating because they are producers of slave labor and perceived as extremely valuable.

In North Sudan, slavery was restored in 1983, when the Islamic government began using slave raids as a weapon in its military campaign to put down the southern rebellion against the government’s imposition of Islamic law. “The government armed Arab Muslim militia groups and encouraged them to raid Southern villages, steal their property, and take their women and children as slaves – [t]ens of thousands of [Christians and non-Muslims] were captured and enslaved.”  Muslims today react by saying that Christians equally approved the practice of slavery. This issue is not uncontested in sacred scripture, the New Testament in particular, which not only acknowledged the institution of slavery but instructed slaves to be obedient to their masters “just as [they] would obey Christ” (Ephesians 6:5).


This book is essential reading, especially by Catholics, who are brainwashed by their Church leadership into the untenable and quite illiterate view that Muhammadism is a ‘brother’ religion and the 40.000 Moslem attacks since 9-11; along with hundreds of thousands of dead and wounded, is somehow ‘un-Islamic’.  Or, that the reduction of Medieval Europe’s population by 25-30% from Moslem invasion, Jihad, sex-trafficking, slave-trading and yearly depredations and war, was somehow disconnected from the ‘real, authentic, Islam’, itself spread by brigands, totalitarians and thugs such as Muhammad and Abu Bakr, in which Jews, Christians and Pagans were murdered, slaughtered, raped and forcibly converted.


Read Mein Koran, read it and weep, as page after page extols the Muslim Umma and exhorts it to completely eviscerate non-Moslems.  Muhammadism is a globally focused fascism.

2030: Your Children's Future in Islamic Britain, by David Vincent

The Moslem Jihad

Bookmark and Share

Surely never to make the Fake News book reviews, or be presented on the Fake News BBC, Vincent’s book makes horrifying reading.  The only issue with the book, is that Vincent may actually be understating his case that a rapidly Islamifying Britain, will be 40% Moslem by 2040, and descend into civil strife between 2030-2050.  This is because his data is based on 2011 census and government reports. 

If the Muslim population of the UK were to continue growing at an annual rate of 6.7% (as it did between 2004 and 2008,) its share of the total UK population would rise from just under 4% in 2008 to 8% in 2020, to 15% in 2030 and to 28% in 2040, finally passing 50% in 2050.

I think he under-estimates the ramp-up in Moslems in the UK- by half.  Go stand at Heathrow Terminal 4 for a few hours and watch the Moslem families roll in by the hundreds.  They new arrivals are not hard to spot, with many children and long baggage trains.  Is this what UK voters asked for?  How many of these new ‘immigrants’ will be working, paying taxes and respecting UK culture including Jews and Christians?

There is another census in 2021 and the full scale of the Moslem invasion, with all the attendant consequences of unemployment, welfare state implosion, explosion in crime, sex trafficking, Jew-hate, and Christophobia and the requisite (Labour party) political-pandering will be hard for the government and the Fake News to bury and forget about. 

In February 2015 the government announced that immigration had reached record levels with 624,000 more foreigners coming to live in Britain in the 12 months up to last September while 327,000 of the brightest and the most able left for Australia, America, Canada and New Zealand.

70% of Moslems in London are unemployed.  What is the result?  Crime, 45-90 knife attacks per day, a machete attack every 2 hours or so, daily FGM (but not a single Moslem-related prosecution), sex trafficking of White and Sikh girls, failing schools and due to the above social issues, a broken and exhausted socialised health care system.  The welfare state teat sucked dry by those who view the Infidel as an inferior economic cash machine, designed to support and sustain the Muhammadans:

the NHS will need £230 billion a year to keep it running by 2030, more than twice its current budget. Labour’s team of crack economists may have also forgotten that the children of this massive new public sector workforce as well as the armies of migrant no-skilled no-English speaking unemployed will also need to go to school. Migrationwatch’s analysis of ONS figures show that over the next decade Britain will need one million extra school places at a cost of £100billion.

80% of Moslems vote Labour.  The entire future strategy of Labour will be to permanently graft the Moslem vote and demonise anyone who criticises Muhammadism as a ‘racist’ or ‘phobe’. 

Of course, the UK government, including the Tories, who also enforce Islamophobia and jails those who criticise its favourite pets (many Tory councillors and MPs are under investigation for ‘racism’ and hate speech), will never disclose the true welfare largesse gifted to Moslems.  The UK welfare system will go bankrupt unless Moslem immigration is halted.  

The Daily Telegraph reported in 2012 that 75% of all Muslim women were unemployed while 50% of all Muslim men are unemployed (67.5% of all Muslims in Britain).

Britain our current situation, regarding the number of Muslims claiming benefit among the wider population, closely mirrors Denmark where, by 2014, more than 40% of their total welfare budget was spent on supporting the unproductive Muslim population. In the absence of official data all that can be done is to estimate, based on what is available from non-governmental sources. These are Danish statistics.

In one media report, an area in Bradford (south-west) with a population of 35.000, reportedly 65% are Moslem Pakistani, with about 50% of Moslems in this area unable to speak English.  The unemployment rate must be massive.  How is this ‘enriching’?

75% of British Pakistanis in Bradford now married to their first cousins and almost 60% nationwide. We keep hearing that we should be grateful to the 26% of doctors and 40% of nurses from over 200 foreign nations who keep our NHS alive, but who is the NHS for anymore? We know that as immigration has increased so has the overall cost of the NHS, with consultants now being paid up to £3,000 per shift. The truth is that the NHS has been bloated out of all recognition to become an arm of overseas aid serving an international immigrant base, paid for by mostly English taxpayers.

Then we have the take-over of state apparati.  Moslem police officers (six) have even been filmed kicking in the door of a Conservative Jew in London who apparently criticised Muhammadism online and was charged with a ‘hate crime’.  Imagine the Fake News outcry if 6 Jewish Police Officers returned the favour to a Moslem tweeting ‘death to Jews’.  There is the social and political-cultural cost of the Moslem infiltration of schools, the police, the government and political parties – all enacted to change the culture and enforce Sharia.

The BBC and Fake News labels anyone leaving East London, or parts of Birmingham, Bradford, Leeds, or Manchester, due to the Moslem influx a ‘racist’.  Leaving the UK completely is becoming a de-facto norm amongst the White, Black educated and mobile ‘classes’.  Why are people leaving?  Simply because Muhammadism conquers, it does not assimilate.

At 40% nations experience widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks, and ongoing militia warfare. From 60% nations experience unfettered persecution of non-believers of all other religions (including non-conforming Muslims), sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of sharia law as a weapon, and jizyah, the tax placed on infidels.”

The economic illiteracy and fallacy of ‘population’ growth fuels or rather excuses this open-borders nonsense.  If population was correlated with wealth, Nigeria and most African countries would be very wealthy.  Western governments have massively increased the cost of living, suppressed birth-rates and promoted abortion as a contraceptive.  They then use these as a rationale for carpet bombing their states with Moslems and Africans to feed birth rates and do jobs ‘Brits won’t do’.  Brits cannot compete with slave and cash labour, with ‘immigrants’ living 10 to a house collecting welfare, not paying taxes and pocketing cash for cheap labour jobs.  This applies to Eastern Europeans in the UK as well as Moslems and Africans.

I have written extensively on the commonality between Nazism, Communism and Islam.  I have never understood the policy goal of importing people who are diametrically opposed to your culture, former religion, your history, your beliefs, and your world-view, with the sordid and ignorant belief that you can ‘change them’ and create a multi-cultural harmony. 

This has never happened with Muhammadism in its history.  There never was or will be a harmonious golden age, medieval Spain include.  Can you imagine the indignation by the usual cadre of big-brains, when such (quite obvious) comparisons are freely expressed in public Vincent agrees:

Like Nazism and Communism, Islamism has no time for democracy, free speech or human rights. As with Nazism it is fuelled by hatred of Jews but also of Christians, atheists, homosexuals, liberated women and ethnic minorities in the Islamic world. Only those who have experienced Islamist rule in tooth and claw can know of its full horrors. Freedom is the first victim of Islamism and all those in the West who want their children to live free must become aware of the urgent need to identify and destroy this horrific ideology.

Islamism and Nazism are inescapably connected in a way Islam and freedom and democracy are not. It’s not only the common thread of hatred for the Jews, hatred of our soft democratic systems, a belief in war and conquest and the enslavement of other races that binds the Nazi’s to the Islamists. Islamists not only share National Socialist ambitions for world domination but go further, in their supremacist ideology over non-Muslims and doctrine of three choices: “conquest, convert or kill”.

This is rather obvious.  Can I as a practicing Catholic wear a Cross in a Moslem country without fear of mob-attack, reprisals, a beating or jail time?  Yet there are now 500 Mosques in London UK alone, and over 2.000 scattered around the UK, protected by the police, politicians, the un-civil service, the Fake News, academia and socialists-globalists pandering for the multi-culti vote and support.  Why would any country allow this descent into madness and suicide?