The greatest argument against presenting a moon cult named 'Submission' as a 'religion' is to read its foundational document, and most important and 'sacred' text – the Koran. If you read it you will be appalled by the savagery, the incoherent and barely understandable wording; and the endless calls to prostration to the moon idol Allah, and the domination or destruction of infidels, Jews, Christians and others. You will also notice that the Koranic verses do change. When Mohammed and his brigands were weak, the verses plead for mercy and tolerance from the local Meccans. When Mohammed and his robbers became strong and rich through caravan trading and had taken over Medina; the verses become strident, and quite intolerant, demanding submission by Mecca and other non-Muslims to the moon-cult; tax payments from infidels to fund Muslim expansion and living standards; and the death or enslavement of those who dare fight or oppose the Meccan moon cult. The Koran is the best proof possible, that Islam is no more a religion than Scientology. It is based on a pre-Mohammed moon cult, whose rituals, lusts, and practices inform Islam.

Burning the Koran is nonsensical. So too is burning Mein Kampf. Churchill was one of the few British politicians who bothered to read the insanity of Mein Kampf. He therefore knew full well, what the Nazi and Hitlerite plans were post 1933. Such knowledge helped to form his many sordid predictions highlighting future Nazi imperialism and the need for war. All Fascisms need to expand to survive. So too it goes with Islam. Jihad is the natural impulse of the Meccan moon cult. Without the booty, women and pillage of the 'others', Islam would simply collapse from its own inherent and very incoherent absurdity.

Like Churchill I have read Mein Kampf and reviewed it here. Mein Kampf and the Koran are very similar – an observation first made to my knowledge by Churchill. Islam, like Nazism, is not a religion because it denies the four fundamentals of what actually constitutes a religion, namely; the Golden Rule, Free-Will, Rationality, and Humanism. Like Nazism, or Communism [both of which are communal, statist and left-wing constructs]; Islam desires the elimination of the person into the communal cult. No free-will, no individuality, just follow the diktats of the cult and its myths and cherished liturgy. All three are rabidly racist [Stalinism exterminated tens of thousands of Jews]. Islam like the other 2 great Fascisms mandates the replacement of rationality and humanism by mysticism and rituals [throwing rocks; praying to a moon idol, the Meccan pilgrimage; belief in little devils, prayers of submission...]. As I wrote about Mein Kampf, the same could be said of the Koran:

Hitler's obsession with the Jew, and with destroying Marxism which he viewed as a Jewish movement designed to control the world; was hardly unique. Many equated Marxist socialism with Jewish plots and conspiracies. Yet Hitlerism was itself of course a statist-socialist philosophy which pilloried Marxism for most of its ideas and fought with Marxists for the same political space and support. What differentiated Hitlerism from Marxism was its racial theory and extreme German nationalism. Marxism like Islam is not bound by color or nationality, but by adherence to the philosophy itself, an ideology demanding submission and compliance.

Islam is a universal, racially agnostic, will-to-power theology. Hitlerism is racially based universalism. Islam like Communism is not – it is theologically based. If you want to understand the cult, you need to read its key text. Mein Kampf and Lenin's writings were the center pieces of Marxist-Socialist Hitlerism and Leninism. The Koran, in all of its profound madness, is at the core of Islam.

I have read the Koran and have reviewed most of the Suras. Under today's laws, in every country except the USA which does not have Human Rights Commissions and still maintains the quaint and old-fashioned idea of free speech, the Koran is legally defined as hate speech. I outlined why a few years ago.  Islamic political theology contravenes the essentials of hate-speech laws - why then is the Koran not being 'prosecuted', or more specifically, why are Imams preaching the Koran not being jailed?

“Canadian hate speech 'law' is founded upon a national 'human rights' charter which protects 4 groups – Gays, religious groups, minorities and different races [non-white]. Section [318] identifies hate speech in two parts:

1.inciting a group to violence against another group or individual and
2. promoting hatred against an identifiable group.

European laws pre-date the Canadian, and are very similar. In the multi-cult EUtopia hate speech laws are now being used to drag basement bloggers criticizing Islam, to tribunals and prisons. Though it is not a crime to deny the existence of the Holocaust for instance, within Europe, it is a high crime to criticize a minority group or religion, in such a way, that discrimination or hatred may follow.....

Sura 2:
---------
190. Fight in the cause of Allah those who fight you...

191. And slay them wherever you catch them, and turn them out from where they have turned you out; for tumult and oppression are worse than slaughter;

216. Fighting is prescribed for you, and you dislike it. But it is possible that you dislike a thing which is good for you, and that you love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knows, and you know not.

Sura 3:
--------
12. Say to those who reject Faith “Soon will you be vanquished and gathered together to Hell, - an evil bed indeed (to lie on)!

Sura 4:
---------
34. .....As to those women on whose part you fear disloyalty and ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly); but if they return to obedience, do not seek against them means (of annoyance): for Allah is most High, Great (above you all).

Sura 5:
--------
33. The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land...

Sura 6
------
165. It is He Who has made you (His) agents, inheritors of the earth: He has raised you in ranks, some above others; that He may try you in the gifts He has given you: for your Lord is quick in punishment: yet He is indeed Oft-forgiving, Most Merciful.

Sura 7
------
4. How many towns have We destroyed (for their sins)? Our punishment took them on a sudden by night or while they slept for their afternoon rest.

Sura 8
------

37. In order that Allah may separate the impure from the pure, put the impure, one on another, heap them together, and cast them into Hell.

Sura 9
------
101. Certain of the desert Arabs round about you are Hypocrites...you do not know them: We know them: twice shall We punish them: and in addition they shall be sent to a grievous Penalty.

Sura 11
-------
16. They are those for whom there is nothing in the Hereafter but the Fire: vain are the designs they frame therein, and of no effect are the deeds they do !”

Those are only some Suras one can post adjuring violence, racism, and war. Many others exist in the Koran. The 2 or 3 [at most] sentences that the multi-cult drags out to prove that Islam is peace are always taken out of context. These are, without exception, preceded by declarations of intolerance and violence, and followed by caveats such as, 'let them be, for Allah will make them pay for their sins...' or some such descriptor. In other words anything nice in the Koran, which is no more than 2% of the total text [people have counted], either references only Muslims, or in the case of non-Muslims is prefaced and suffixed with intolerant and quite supremacist intentions.

The point is this. Don't burn or ban the Koran. Read it. The more that people are educated about the Koran and Islam, the less likely is the chance that the Muslims can destroy our civilization. Ignorance is not bliss. It is just ignorance. The politicians have never read the Koran. The media en-masse has not read it. The average citizen must read it. Especially if he or she enjoys the greatness of the modern world, and Western civilization.