The Germans are awakening from their slumber with regards to the threat of Islam. First Chancelloress Merkel said the obvious when she highlighted in a recent speech that the cult of Multi-culturalism had failed. She did not mention it, but her comments were directed of course at the incapacity of Islamic theology to tolerate, accommodate, or integrate with the host society; a truism found throughout history and within all areas of the Western world. Due to this failure German society was being riven and depreciated as Islamic immigrants, and second and even third generation Muslims reject Germany's Western Judeo-Christian society.

Second, a new German party, soon to be dubbed 'far right', 'extremist', 'shocking' and of course 'fascist' by the Euro media and elite has arisen. It is Freiheit – or Freedom party – an imitation of Geert Wilders' Dutch political party which is now the third most popular party in the Netherlands. It is small, less than 100 members, but one has to start somewhere.

Maybe over the next decade it can replicate Wilders' success in Holland; in which he and his party have put Islam squarely within the realm of public debate in Europe; notwithstanding the travesty of the state prosecuted trial against Herr Wilders and the ridiculous claim that he is inciting hatred by criticising the Meccan moon cult named Submission. This is a man who lives under 24 hour watch and security from Muslims who wish to kill him, demonstrating yet again that Islam is peace. The German Freedom party will no doubt be targeted by the state, Muslims and the politically-correct intolerant crowd for destruction.

Daniel Pipes, expert and scholar on matters Islamic was at the opening meeting of the new German party, dedicated to freedom, markets and the reduction of Islam's pernicious influence in Germany:

For me, of chief interest was his oral summary of party policies plus the distribution of a 71-page Grundsatzprogramm (“Basic Program”) setting out party positions in detail. Stadtkewitz explained the need for a new German party on the grounds that “The established parties, unfortunately, are not ready to take a clear stand but instead abandon the people to their concerns.” The program neither minces words nor thinks small. Its opening sentence declares that “Western civilization, for centuries a world leader, faces an existential crisis.”

The new party, whose slogan is “the party for more freedom and democracy,” speaks candidly about Islam, Islamism, Islamic law, and Islamization. Starting with the insight that “Islam is not just a religion but also a political ideology with its own legal system,” the party calls for scrutiny of imams, mosques, and Islamic schools, for a review of Islamic organizations to ensure their compliance with German laws, and condemns efforts to build a parallel legal structure based on the Shari’a. Its analysis forcefully concludes: “We oppose with all our force the Islamization of our country.”

This declaration is precise and accurate. Islam is a poli-cracy not a theology. It is only common sense that society should want the inner workings of a cult made transparent. Scientology is after all outlawed in Germany, deemed under German law to be a cult not a religion. Why is Islam tolerated as a theology when it is clear that is both a political program and a means of social control, using pre-modern ideals which have no resonance with existing German society.

As Pipes goes on to declare:

However clear these passages, as well as the rejection of Turkish accession to the European Union, they comprise only about 2 percent of the Basic Program, which applies traditional Western values and policies generally to German political life. Its topics include German peoplehood, direct democracy, the family, education, the workplace, economics, energy, the environment, health, and so on. Offering a wide platform makes good sense, fitting the anti-Islamization program into a full menu of policies.

Despite this, of course, press coverage of the founding emphasized Freiheit’s position vis-à-vis Islam, defining it as a narrowly “anti-Islam party.”

The establishment of Freiheit prompts two observations: First, while it fits into a pattern of emerging European parties that focus on Islam as central to their mission, it differs from the others in its broader outlook. Whereas Wilder’s PVV blames nearly every societal problem on Islam, Freiheit, in addition to opposing “with all our force the Islamization of our country,” has many other issues on its agenda.

Wilders' party is actual much more similar to Freiheit than Mr. Pipes would allow. But the point is well made. A small percentage of the German Freedom party's agenda is focused on Islam. For the media and the elite's that will of course be the central focus. Islam, Leftism, Globaloney Warming, the multicult, the O-Bamamessiah....these and other platitudes and manifestations of statism intolerance cannot be disputed. This is why of course the new Germany party, like Wilders' PVV will do very well over time, at the polls. Whatever the elite supports is usually wrong. That means there is an ample political and market opportunity for the opposite.