At the risk of going to jail for 'thought crimes', it is laughingly obvious to any who study the political-economy, that the cult of multiculturalism, was always destined to fail. Uni-cultures, premised on natural law rights, freedom, political representation, open-trade, and military preparedness survive. Multi-cults who posit the inane and immoral idea that all cultures are the same and that the history's of all people are 'similar and important' create states riven by group 'rights', ghetto mentalities and the destructiveness of state power. The multi-cult is the surest path for a state to force 'conformity', elevate its power to ensure 'equality of cultures', and indoctrinate its citizenry in the cult of the state, as it deposes and reduces the original majoritorian culture to a theology which not only must be rejected, but even criminalized. Thus, if you criticise the failure of a moon-cult from Mecca, and dare to argue that Muslim baths, worship rooms, and state-financed mosques are deleterious to the greater society, than you must be punished and imprisoned for hate crimes.

Lately major European political figures have pointed out the obvious that Islamic non-culture does not integrated with host cultures. Why should it? The Koran is very clear in its racism and supremacism. Infidels burn in hell for not following the Allah-thing and only Muslims will be blest with ever-lasting bounty and ease in heaven. Maybe individual Muslims do integrate nicely into European or North American society. Maybe not. No one knows what the individual thinks or does. But it is a certainty that the cultural cant of his cult is magnificiently supremacist and puts itself at Jihadic odds with the host society. There is no disputation about that fact. Muslim demands as their populations grow will only intensify. The internal multi-cult war within the West will only accelerate in sharpness and querelousness as Islam swaggers in to fill the spiritual-social void ripped apart by Western cultural Marxism and massive, unbridled, illiterate statism. Where there is almost unlimited state power and despotism, we know that ignorance, the destruction of natural law rights and individuality; and the evisceration of true culture is never far behind.

The Multi-cult cult, is a terrible idea in both practice and reality. There is no moral, social, economic or cultural relativity between states, empires, locales, or histories. None. The Ottoman empire was a despotic Orientalized brutality whose practice in slavery, Christian destruction and unlimited Jihadic warfare was echoed by its savaged populations in which poverty, illiteracy, ritualization and fear all competed for attention. This culture had nothing in common with northern Italy's rebirth, nor with the Gouden-Eeuw or Golden age of maritime Holland, nor with the Christian imperial spread of Catherine's Russia across Central Asia. Middle class Britain laughed at by the fascist despot Napoleon, had little in common with the ruins of non-societies one would have found in 19^th century Persia, Turkey, Africa or Saudi Arabia.

The truth is this: there is no cultural relativity whatsoever between Western development and the Orientalisms of Asia and Islam. Western history is simply superior. This is not to say that all matters of Western development are moral in our modern sense of that word. But likewise it is also rather obtuse and disingenuous to apply today's standard of morality – a Western invention – to past Western epochs, but not to say Islamic history or Arab imperialist expansion. Thus the US which fought a civil war to end slavery in which 400.000 Blacks were brought to the US in chains and whose population had grown by 1860 to 2 million, is vilified even today as a racist-white power culture. Yet Islam still sanctions, practices and trades in slavery, including the sex slavery of women. Islam never fought, and never will fight a war to liberate slaves. The Koran says that slavery is fine. Mohammed traded in slaves and had 12 or more sex concubines. Ergo for Muslims and the Koranic cult, slavery is fine. What 'relativity' then makes Islam just as exalted as US culture?

The sickenss of the multi-cult club should be obvious. But perversely this illness is a touchstone of modern political certainty. The logic is vapid but oft-repeated - the more multi-cult your country is, the more superior it must be. The multi-cult propaganda, sponsored by the state is endless, extolling in a mindless sort of way, the supposed virtues of tolerance, diversity, respect and humanity. In actual fact of course, the ineluctable outcome of the multi-cult fetish, one enforced upon society by the state, is the opposite of what is proposed. The most rabid of the multi-cult lovers including state human rights commissions and their political masters are the most intolerant and un-diverse of minds and attitudes. The multi-cult thus morphs into something that it demonizes – an intolerant despotism.

The multi-cult signals a failure not only of society, but of state interference in the organic growth of the nation state.

Multiple cultures cannot and do not co-exist for long. There has to be a majoritarian culture. The Romans for instance tolerated diverse gods, regional or local idiosyncrasies and differing tastes – as long as Roman law, language, culture, Gods and supremacy were acknowledged. Once the Jews for example challenged Roman power in 70 AD and 135 AD, the Roman state was forced to eradicate not only the rebels, but the entire Jewish culture including its temples and vestiges of its God.

The British empire ran on similar ideas as the Roman. Light occupation, small professional military forces, backing up the cultural supremacy of the British ideal embedded in law, education, commerce and innovations in daily life. Once the conquered elite bought in to the British ideal, the 'colonials' could police themselves. This allowed the British to use culture to subdue a continent such as India – with less than 25.000 professional British troops, police and administrators. This is the greatest display of culture dominating an entirely foreign people and empire, yet known in man's recorded history.

The British and Romans knew that uni-cultures survive. Multi-cults don't. Today of course the mantra – repeated as often as Globaloney warming lies – is the opposite. Multi-cults are good, especially if they denude and degrade European-White culture, Jews, or that of the Anglo-Americans. This attitude borders on puerility for its lack of foundation and logic.

The shibboleths of the multi-cult ideology are tolerance, diversity and 'respect', as if these are not aspects of any successful majoritarian culture. Tolerance, diversity and respect were all apparent in Cromwell's England for example as the Jews, and various religious sects were allowed back, even as Papists and plotting Catholics designing to overthrow the realm were killed. An overarching culture – Protestantism – was the framework in which other diversities could act. Without the overarching framework imposed by Protestantism it is highly unlikely that the English would have created the modern world.

Would the Industrial Revolution still have occurred without the capital, the ideas, the energy, and the innovation offered by the minimalist English-Protestant state ? The answer is an obvious no. A multi-cult pot-pourri without any singular purpose would never have created the revolutions in products and concepts which enveloped England and America during the 19^th and early 20^th centuries. There has to be a framework of law, attitudes, mores, and a general belief in the ability of man, in order to effect true progress and societal change. The current multi-cult fetish supports none of this.

The modern multi-cult does not manufacture any of the cultural ideas of real progress and that is its greatest failure. For the multi-cults, all cultures and ideas are relative and this is the core of their religion. This idea is of course a nonsense. It is preposterous to fantasize that all cultures are similar, or similarly 'right'. They are not. Most cultures are notable failures. There is only one instance when man has been liberated from Oriental despotism and that was through the Western European-American tradition. No other culture even comes close.

The multi-cult is a state created and state-supported religious tenet. It is an article of faith within the church of left-wing government. That is of course, the main purpose of the multi-cult. It is used by the state as an excuse for imposing a state-dominated culture upon Western society. It is also used by the state to alleviate state failings.

Thanks to the unbelievable size of government the Western world suffers from: massive abortions; taxation; a high cost of living; and decling real birth rates. In order to resolve these government imposed burdens, the multi-cult is invoked to allow massive immigration from non-Western lands. All this does is carve up society into little groups, each one lobbying for special privileges, monies and favors. In essence, the inevitable result of the multi-cult is the disintegration of society. Taxes will rise to support various multi-cult claims; the mono-culture will be destroyed; and all rules, laws, ideas, conventions, historical convenants, and linkages to the 1000 year European-American past of achievement will be forgotten.

In essence at some point, the modern Western welfare state, abused by the usurpation of the multi-cult ideal, will not exist. If there is no over-arching ideology or culture, society will simply degenerate into some form of social strife and disintegration.  Out of this fracas you might find that your world might be taken over by a swaggering, intolerant pagan-fascism such as unbridled National-Socialism, autarchic communalism, or by a theology like Islam. One intolerant ideal replacing another I suppose. That might just be the delicious historical irony and fate of the multi-cult cult. One illiterate despotism being usurped by another, maybe even one denoted quite rightly as a moon-cult.