Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was superior to anything Islam had developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions. Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'. Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.
Moslem geniuses and their massive-big brain friends in the West, most of whom have never read Mein Koran or Mein Hadith; usually reference 2 Koranic sources to prove that Islam is peace. The first Koranic resource is 2:256 or the no-compulsion in religion apocrypha. If you bother to read the entirety of chapter 2, you will find out that their is plenty of compulsion in Islam. The quoted sentence fragment in 2:256 is followed by a long sordid denunciation of those who deny Islam. Chapter or Sura 2 is one of the most intolerant in the Koran and targets Christians and Jews for destruction. Witness 2:257
|
Allah is the Wali (Protector or Guardian) of those who believe. He brings them out from darkness into light. But as for those who disbelieve, their Auliya (supporters and helpers) are Taghut [false deities and false leaders, etc.], they bring them out from light into darkness. Those are the dwellers of the Fire, and they will abide therein forever. |
How kind.
A second verse trotted out by the huge minds is 5:32. Sura 5 like Sura 2, is a long screed of hate-speech and intolerance. But enormous minds with Phds pull out this little fragment and declare that the 1600 verses of Koranic hate speech are per-force null and void.
Here is 5:32: “On that account: We ordained for the Children of Israel that if anyone slew a person - unless it be in retaliation for murder or for spreading mischief in the land - it would be as if he slew all mankind: and if anyone saved a life, it would be as if he saved the life of all humanity.”
Tears on my pillow. 'Spreading mischief in the land', means opposing Islam, denying Muhammad, disbelief that Baal the ilah of Mecca, is 'god'. 'Spreading mischief in the land', means defending yourself against Moslems, fighting the Jihad, and even criticizing Muhammad's cult. Ergo killing those who are 'spreading mischief' is fine.
Anyone who has read Mein Koran knows that Infidel life is not held to be sacred. Infidels, including the old, women and children, can be killed if they oppose Islam or 'spread mischief in the land'.
Sayid ibn Jubayr who lived at the time of Muhammad, and was a companion of Ayesha), said:
.....Sa`id bin Jubayr said, "He who allows himself to shed the blood of a Muslim, is like he who allows shedding the blood of all people. He who forbids shedding the blood of one Muslim, is like he who forbids shedding the blood of all people." In addition, Ibn Jurayj said that Al-A`raj said that Mujahid commented on the Ayah,
We find this in the text Human Beings Should Respect the Sanctity of Other Human Beings written by Tafsir Ibn Kathir, one of the most respected Moslem theologians. Islam is a dichotomous cult. Be nice to Moslems. Dominate, enslave, rape, convert or kill the rest. Simple.
2:256 and 5:32 have about as much to do with accepting and being nice to non-Moslems, as Hitlerian-Evolutionary dogma had with accepting and being kind to Jews and Catholics.