Until the advent of materialism and 19th c. dogma, Western Civilisation was superior to anything Islam had developed. Islam has not aided in the development of the modern world; in fact civilisation has only been created in spite of Islam. Proof of this resides in the 'modern' world and the unending political-economic and spiritual poverty of Muslim states and regions. Squatting on richer civilisations is not 'progress'. Islam is pagan, totalitarian, and irrational.
“We declare ourselves to be clear of you, and enmity and hatred have appeared between us and you forever until you believe in allah alone.” [60:2-4]
A political rule is to deny wanting anything. When Antony offered Caesar a crown, the great conqueror and politician disdainfully refused the gift. With one eye on the large crowd and the other on the Senate, Caesar rightly calculated that accepting such a trophy would probably send the non-existent Republic into civil chaos. No Kings in Rome. At least not in name. For his efforts at trying to save Rome from itself, and embark upon serious reforms Caesar was of course murdered by 60 indolent self-obsessed elites who feared a loss of their wealth and power. Maybe he should have accepted the crown and not have been so modestly deceitful.
So it goes with Islam. Moslems might refuse to publicly accept or admit facets of their cult theology as being intolerant, racist, supremacist, irrational and misogynist. But what would you expect? It is highly unlikely that a Moslem in the West being part of a group which is 10% or less of the population [which was 0% 30 years ago...], is going to cheerfully admit that he wants Muhammad [who is Allah] and his cult to rule the world. Indeed some Moslems might not desire such an outcome or give it little thought. But we can also assume that many do want this outcome and do spend quite a bit of time engaged in making it happen, whether it is the slow conversion process of near-by infidels, the building of mosques in our city centers, the demand for public monies for Koranic-based schools, forcing schools to have a Moslem-only lunch time prayer in the cafetaria, or expostulating that Sharia law is really benign and part of the Western tradition. All of these activities take time, money and effort. This says nothing about the 17 or so armed Moslem compounds in North America training Jihadists, or the various urban cells centered around Mosques preaching racism, hate and the eradication of Western society and 'radicalizing' little Mohammeds. These are facts that the mainstream media to my knowledge have never investigated.
Moslems will lie about their intentions and tell you what you want to hear. Like politicians they will agree with you and move on forgetting in a flash the just-held conversation. Taqqiya is an Arab word much used within the Koran and Islamic theology where inferior non-muslim Infidels are simply misled and laughed at after being fattened and fed with a delectable buffet of lies and nonsense.
[33.48] And be not compliant to the unbelievers and the hypocrites, and leave unregarded their annoying talk, and rely on Allah; and Allah is sufficient as a Protector.
Allah or Ba'al, which in the Koran becomes conflated with Muhammad demands that you do anything to spread the cult of the unknowable, unreachable, severe, angry, celestial deity [or Muhammad]. Lying to help the cult is perfectly 'moral' within Islam. This duality surprises Westerners for whom binary interpretations are needed. How can lying be moral they ask? Anything is moral if it helps expand and strengthen the purity of Islam and the cult. If you need to cleanse your family and Islam in toto, by murdering your daughter who 'dishonored' Islam and your family, then by all means do it. If a Jew kills a Moslem in Israel, and you are a good Moslem living in North Africa, then by all means murder a local Jew as compensation. If you are a Moslem living in the West and are offended by the 'tempting meat' shown through the dress of Western women, then by all means rape them since they have transgressed the 'covering up' laws of Sharia. Whatever pleases Allah can be done. Why else do Moslems who commit crimes in the West constantly whine that 'I am following Allah's orders'?
Taqiyya means 'concealing or disguising one's beliefs, convictions, ideas, feelings, opinions, and/or strategies at a time of eminent danger, whether now or later in time, to save oneself from physical and/or mental injury.' In other words if you need to lie to save yourself do it. If you need to lie to expand the cult do it. If you need to lie to get that mosque built on the site of 9-11 then do it. If you need to engage in criminal activity to procure money to build your Islamic center then by Allah just do it.
A warrior theology and cult is hardly one that places a value on truth or honesty. Any deed no matter how evil, degraded, immoral or destructive is 'good' in the Moslem tradition as long as it expands the cult. That is a fact of Islamic and Koranic history. Islam was spread by blood and war, not hugs, chocolates, public toilet building and missionaires. Many Moslems [most?] truly believe that they will inherit the world. Hence their immature and quite psychologically imbalanced opposition and violence to anyone, or any action, which negates that objective.
Moslems [many, most?] call the Infidel world the house of war, or Dar-al-Harb. Now that is a clear designation isn't it? Can one imagine the piety of the Western multi-cult, feminazis, and eco-fascists along with politicians and the media, if the Western world described the sphere of Islam as a house of war? The messaging is quite clear. Infidels must be 'warred' against and either converted or slaughtered. Isn't that what usually happens in a war ?
But given the Moslem-Arab culture of Taqiyya it is highly unlikely that a Moslem will state that openly in the West, though a few 'radical' preachers and Imans have uttered this obvious truth. Politicians and the media in toto know very little about Islam. None of them would have an opinion on Taqiyya because they either don't know about it or perforce reject its reality. Why bother with facts when fantasy is so much nicer and easier?
Unlike the current crop of political nitwits in power, Winston Churchill was aware of the danger posed by Mohammedanism, or what was rightly called at one point in history, the cult of Mohammed.
The influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it had vainly struggled - the civilization of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilization of ancient Rome.” Winston Churchill, The River War, 1899.
So next time when someone tells you that a Moslem is their best friend, that the smartest people they have ever met are Moslems, that the best dressed and most sophisticated personages they have ever encountered are Moslem remember Taqiyya and remember Dhimmitude. Together they create Dhummi-tude – a state of submission to the moon cult of Mohammed through crass ignorance and forgetting that Moslems will always lie to further the cult of Mohammed.